DOCSLIB.ORG

UCML Microbat Monitoring Report 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UCML Microbat Monitoring Report 2020 UCML Microbat Monitoring Report 2020 Ulan Coal Mines Limited © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD 1 UCML Microbat Monitoring Report 2020 | Ulan Coal Mines Limited DOCUMENT TRACKING Project Name UCML Microbat Monitoring Report 2020 Project Number MUD20-17635 Project Manager Tom Kelly Prepared by Tom Kelly, Dr Rod Armistead Reviewed by Dr Frank Lemckert Approved by Rachel Murray Status Final Version Number v3 Last saved on 29 March 2021 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2021. UCML Microbat Monitoring Report 2020. Prepared for Ulan Coal Mines Limited.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Ulan Coal Mines Limited. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Ulan Coal Mines Limited . The scope of services was defined in consultation with Ulan Coal Mines Limited , by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. Template 2.8.1 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD i UCML Microbat Monitoring Report 2020 | Ulan Coal Mines Limited Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Purpose of this monitoring report ........................................................................................................ 8 1.3 Updates to 2020 monitoring program ................................................................................................ 10 2. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Control sites ........................................................................................................................................ 12 2.2 Impact sites ......................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Acoustic call data analysis ................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Survey limitations ............................................................................................................................... 18 2.5 Weather conditions ............................................................................................................................ 20 3. Results ...................................................................................................................................... 21 3.1 Control sites ........................................................................................................................................ 21 3.2 Impact sites ......................................................................................................................................... 23 4. Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 29 4.1 Provision of threatened species habitat ............................................................................................. 29 4.2 Targeted threatened cave-roosting microbat species activity ............................................................ 30 4.2.1 Large-eared Pied Bat ....................................................................................................................................... 31 4.2.2 Large Bent-winged Bat .................................................................................................................................... 32 5. Conclusion and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 34 5.1 General conclusions and recommendations....................................................................................... 34 5.2 Provision of threatened species habitat ............................................................................................. 34 5.3 Targeted threatened cave-roosting microbat species activity ............................................................ 34 References ................................................................................................................................................ 36 Appendix A Acoustic call data ........................................................................................................ 38 Appendix B Anabat call profiles ..................................................................................................... 43 Appendix C Harp trapping data ...................................................................................................... 51 Appendix D Photographs ............................................................................................................... 52 List of Figures Figure 1: The northern portion of targeted cliffline monitoring sites monitored during 2020 ............... 15 Figure 2: The southern portion of targeted cliffline monitoring sites monitored during 2020 ............... 16 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ii UCML Microbat Monitoring Report 2020 | Ulan Coal Mines Limited Figure 3: Monthly and cumulative rainfall totals for 2019, 2020 and long-term mean dating back to 1906 (UCML 2021; BOM 2021) ......................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 4: Mean Large-eared Pied Bat call activity (calls per night) across all monitoring sites, 2013 – 2020 .................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Figure 5: Mean Large-eared Pied Bat call activity across both control and impact sites, 2013 – 2020 ... 32 Figure 6: Mean Large Bent-winged Bat call activity (calls per night) across all monitoring sites, 2013 – 2020 .......................................................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 7: Mean Large Bent-winged Bat call activity across both control and impact sites, 2013 – 2020 33 Figure 8: Call profile for Austronomus australis (White-striped Free-tailed Bat) recorded at UWLW7h at 2338 (23:38 p.m.) on 14 December 2020. ............................................................................................... 43 Figure 9: Call profile for Chalinolobus dwyeri (Large-eared Pied Bat) recorded at UWLW7h at 2140 (9.40 p.m.) on 14 December 2020. ................................................................................................................... 43 Figure 10: Call profile for Chalinolobus gouldii (Gould’s Wattled Bat) recorded at BD6 at 2116 (9:16 p.m.) on 9 December 2020. ............................................................................................................................... 44 Figure 11: Call profile for Chalinolobus morio (Chocolate Wattled Bat) recorded at BD6 at 2202 (10:02 p.m.) on 16 September 2020. .................................................................................................................. 44 Figure 12: Call profile for Miniopterus orianae oceanensis (Large Bent-winged Bat) recorded at BD6 at 0359 (3:59 a.m.) on 10 December 2020. ................................................................................................. 45 Figure 13: Potential call profile for Nyctophilus corbeni (Corben’s Long-eared Bat) / Nyctophilus gouldii (Gould’s Long-eared Bat) / Nyctophilus geoffroyi (Lesser Long-eared Bat) recorded at UWLW7h at 0148 (1:48 a.m.) on 17 December 2020. .......................................................................................................... 45 Figure 14: Call profile for Ozimops species complex (this is a call profile that can most likely be attributed to Ozimops ridei (Ride’s Free-tailed Bat)) recorded at UWLW7h at 0352 (3:52 a.m.) on 15 December 2020. ......................................................................................................................................................... 46 Figure 15: Call profile for Rhinolophus megaphyllus (Eastern Horseshoe Bat) recorded at UWLW7h at 0030 (12:30 a.m.) on 18 December 2020. ............................................................................................... 46 Figure 16: Potential call profile for Saccolaimus flaviventris (Yellow-bellied Sheath-tailed Bat) (lower frequency call Fc =20 kHz) with Vespadelus vulturnus (Little Forest Bat) (higher frequency call at Fc = ~47 kHz) recorded on Impact Site UWLW5j at 0306 (3:06 a.m.) on 5 December 2020. ................................ 47 Figure 17: Potential call profile for Scoteanax rueppellii
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bat Conservation 2021
    Bat Conservation Global evidence for the effects of interventions 2021 Edition Anna Berthinussen, Olivia C. Richardson & John D. Altringham Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 2 © 2021 William J. Sutherland This document should be cited as: Berthinussen, A., Richardson O.C. and Altringham J.D. (2021) Bat Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions. Conservation Evidence Series Synopses. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Cover image: Leucistic lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros hibernating in a former water mill, Wales, UK. Credit: Thomas Kitching Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/ 3 Contents Advisory Board.................................................................................... 11 About the authors ............................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements ............................................................................. 13 1. About this book ........................................................... 14 1.1 The Conservation Evidence project ................................................................................. 14 1.2 The purpose of Conservation Evidence synopses ............................................................ 14 1.3 Who this synopsis is for ................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Background .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Eumops (Chiroptera: Molossidae) from Southwestern Peru
    Zootaxa 3878 (1): 019–036 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3878.1.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FDE7F7A4-7DCC-4155-8D96-A0539229DBFE A new species of Eumops (Chiroptera: Molossidae) from southwestern Peru CÉSAR E. MEDINA1, RENATO GREGORIN2, HORACIO ZEBALLOS1,3, HUGO T. ZAMORA1 & LIGIANE M. MORAS4 1Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional San Agustín (MUSA). Av. Alcides Carrión s/n. Arequipa, Perú. E-mail: [email protected] 2Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, CEP 37200-000, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] 3Instituto de Ciencias de la Naturaleza, Territorio y Energías Renovables, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Av. Universitaria 1801, San Miguel, Lima 32, Perú. E-mail: [email protected] 4Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The genus Eumops is the most diverse genera of molossid bats in the Neotropics. In Peru this genus is widely distributed and represented by nine species: E. auripendulus, E. delticus, E. hansae, E. maurus, E. nanus, E. patagonicus, E. perotis, E. trumbulli, and E. wilsoni. After several years of mammalian diversity surveys in the coastal desert and western slopes of southwestern Peru, a specimen of Eumops was collected whose unique set of traits allows us to assert that deserves to be described as a new species. Based on molecular and morphological evidence, the new species is related to medium- large sized species (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Bat Fauna
    __________________________________________________________________________________ Assessment of risk to Large Forest Bat on Lord Howe Isand from proposed wind turbines. An assessment of the risk to the Large Forest Bat Vespadelus darlingtoni from proposed wind turbines on Lord Howe Island, New South Wales. A report to Lord Howe Island Board G.A. Hoye Fly By Night Bat Surveys Pty Ltd ABN 48 068 562 005 PO Box 271 BELMONT NSW 2280 Tel 4947 7794 Fax 4947 7537 January 2016 January 2016 Fly By Night Bat Surveys Pty Ltd __________________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________________________________________________________________ Assessment of risk to Large Forest Bat on Lord Howe Isand from proposed wind turbines. 1 INTRODUCTION Fly By Night Bat Surveys PL was requested by the Lord Howe Island Board to assess potential impacts to the Large Forest Bat from two proposed wind turbines to be sited in pasture on the southern flank of Transit Hill. This species is currently the only native mammal known to breed on the island. Previous survey has confirmed the presence of this species in the lower elevated parts of the island including the area where the two turbines are proposed (Fly By Night Bat Surveys 2010). A population of approximately 500 breeding females exists north of the airstrip, with a second smaller population centred around Mount Gower and Mount Lidgebird (Fly By Night Bat Surveys 2010-2014). Significant mortality of microchiropteran bats has occurred at utility wind farms in North America and Europe (eg Kunz 2007b). In eastern North America mortality from turbine strike along forested ridge tops varies from 15.3 to 41.1 bats per megawatt (MW) of installed capacity per year Kunz (2007b).
    [Show full text]
  • The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter, Number 31, Nov 2008
    The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter, Number 31, Nov 2008 The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter Number 39 November 2012 ABS Website: http://abs.ausbats.org.au ABS Discussion list - email: [email protected] ISSN 1448-5877 © Copyright The Australasian Bat Society, Inc. (2012) The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter, Number 31, Nov 2008 The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter, Number 39, November 2012 – Instructions for Contributors – The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter will accept contributions under one of the following two sections: Research Papers, and all other articles or notes. There are two deadlines each year: 10th March for the April issue, and 10th October for the November issue. The Editor reserves the right to hold over contributions for subsequent issues of the Newsletter, and meeting the deadline is not a guarantee of immediate publication. Opinions expressed in contributions to the Newsletter are the responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australasian Bat Society, its Executive or members. For consistency, the following guidelines should be followed: Emailed electronic copy of manuscripts or articles, sent as an attachment, is the preferred method of submission. Faxed and hard copy manuscripts will be accepted but reluctantly! Please send all submissions to the Newsletter Editor at the email or postal address below. Electronic copy should be in 11 point Arial font, left and right justified with 16 mm left and right margins. Please use Microsoft Word; any version is acceptable. Manuscripts should be submitted in clear, concise English and free from typographical and spelling errors. Please leave two spaces after each sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 Roberts Road, Eastern Creek
    17 ROBERTS ROAD, EASTERN CREEK SSD-10330 Proposed Data Centre Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Prepared for: Canberra Data Centres Pty Ltd PO Box 304 JERRABOMBERRA NSW 2619 SLR Ref: 610.18883-R05 Version No: -v2.0 November 2019 Canberra Data Centres Pty Ltd SLR Ref No: 610.18883-R05-v2.0-Eastern Creek BDAR-20191111.docx 17 Roberts Road, Eastern Creek November 2019 SSD-10330 Proposed Data Centre Biodiversity Development Assessment Report PREPARED BY SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd ABN 29 001 584 612 10 Kings Road New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia (PO Box 447 New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia) T: +61 2 4037 3200 E: [email protected] www.slrconsulting.com BASIS OF REPORT This report has been prepared by SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (SLR) with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the timescale and resources allocated to it by agreement with Canberra Data Centres Pty Ltd (the Client). Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected, which has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is for the exclusive use of the Client. No warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from SLR. SLR disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work. DOCUMENT CONTROL Reference Date Prepared Checked Authorised 610.18883-R05-v2.0 11 November 2019 Fiona Iolini and David Martin Jeremy
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna Report
    Flora and Fauna Report Heathcote Hall Residential Development Prepared for Fuzortinn Pty Ltd 7 December 2017 Heathcote Hall Residential Development - Flora and Fauna Assessment DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Heathcote Hall Residential Development, Flora and Fauna Report Project Number 3199 Karen Spicer Project Manager 8536 8633 Suite 2, Level 3, 668-672 Old Princes Highway, Sutherland NSW 2232 Prepared by Karen Spicer Reviewed by Meredith Henderson and Brian Towle Approved by Beth Medway Status Final Version Number V2 Last saved on 7 December 2017 Cover photo Photos within the study area, K. Spicer 2015 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2017. Heathcote Hall Flora and Fauna Report. Prepared for Fuzortinn Pty Ltd.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from John Innes of Fuzortinn Pty Ltd and Gustavo Thiermann from Ink Architects. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Fuzortinn PL. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Fuzortinn PL by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Epbc Protected Matters
    EPBC Act Protected Matters Report This report provides general guidance on matters of national environmental significance and other matters protected by the EPBC Act in the area you have selected. Information on the coverage of this report and qualifications on data supporting this report are contained in the caveat at the end of the report. Information is available about Environment Assessments and the EPBC Act including significance guidelines, forms and application process details. Report created: 08/07/15 18:21:20 Summary Details Matters of NES Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Extra Information Caveat Acknowledgements This map may contain data which are ©Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), ©PSMA 2010 Coordinates Buffer: 10.0Km Summary Matters of National Environmental Significance This part of the report summarises the matters of national environmental significance that may occur in, or may relate to, the area you nominated. Further information is available in the detail part of the report, which can be accessed by scrolling or following the links below. If you are proposing to undertake an activity that may have a significant impact on one or more matters of national environmental significance then you should consider the Administrative Guidelines on Significance. World Heritage Properties: None National Heritage Places: None Wetlands of International Importance: 2 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: None Commonwealth Marine Area: None Listed Threatened Ecological Communities: 6 Listed Threatened Species: 40 Listed Migratory Species: 13 Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act This part of the report summarises other matters protected under the Act that may relate to the area you nominated.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of the Habitats, Growth and Reproduction of Eight Species of Tropical Anchovy from Cleveland and Bowling Green Bays, North Queensland
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Hoedt, Frank Edward (1994) A comparative study of the habitats, growth and reproduction of eight species of tropical anchovy from Cleveland and Bowling Green Bays, North Queensland. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/24109/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/24109/ A comparative study of the habitats, growth and reproduction of eight species of tropical anchovy from Cleveland and Bowling Green Bays, North Queensland. Thesis submitted by Frank Edward Hoedt BSc (lions) (JCU) in September 1994 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Marine Biology James Cook University of North Queensland STATEMENT ON ACCESS TO THESIS I, the undersigned, the author of this thesis, understand that James Cook University of North Queensland will make it available for use within the University Library and, by microfilm or other photographic means, allow access to users in other approved libraries. All users consulting this thesis will have to sign the following statement: "In consulting this thesis, I agree not to copy or paraphrase it in whole or in part without the written consent of the author; and to make proper written acknowledgment for any assistance which I have obtained from it." Beyond this, I do not wish to place any restrictions on access to this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants Will Be Assessed on Their Knowledge of Bats, With
    Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants will be assessed on their knowledge of bats, with an emphasis on North American Bats, South American Microbats, and African MegaBats. A TEAM OF UP TO: 2 APPROXIMATE TIME: 50 minutes 2. EVENT PARAMETERS: a. Each team may bring one 2” or smaller three-ring binder, as measured by the interior diameter of the rings, containing information in any form and from any source. Sheet protectors, lamination, tabs and labels are permitted in the binder. b. If the event features a rotation through a series of stations where the participants interact with samples, specimens or displays; no material may be removed from the binder throughout the event. c. In addition to the binder, each team may bring one unmodified and unannotated copy of either the National Bat List or an Official State Bat list which does not have to be secured in the binder. 3. THE COMPETITION: a. The competition may be run as timed stations and/or as timed slides/PowerPoint presentation. b. Specimens/Pictures will be lettered or numbered at each station. The event may include preserved specimens, skeletal material, and slides or pictures of specimens. c. Each team will be given an answer sheet on which they will record answers to each question. d. No more than 50% of the competition will require giving common or scientific names. e. Participants should be able to do a basic identification to the level indicated on the Official List. States may have a modified or regional list. See your state website.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitz-Stirling 2007-2017 Ten-Year Evaluation Review
    Fitz-Stirling 2007-2017 Ten-year Evaluation Review Feb / 2018 P a g e | 1 Acknowledgements: This report has benefited greatly from the discussion and guidance on content, presentation and editing by Annette Stewart, Clair Dougherty and Simon Smale. Their expert assistance is greatly appreciated. Volunteers have played a major and vital role in the monitoring and survey program over the past 5 years and I thank all of those involved. Special thanks go to Dr Sandra Gilfillan for her continuing dedication to the wallaby monitoring and research program. Volunteers Aaron Gove, who provided the bird data analysis and Richard Thomas, who provided the bat data analysis, have made a large contribution to this report and I thank them. I sincerely thank Bill and Jane Thompson who have regularly carried out all the pool monitoring for several years. Thanks also to Barry Heydenrych, Greening Australia, who provided restoration data. Funding to assist the monitoring program and UAV surveys during 2015 was gratefully received from South Coast NRM as part of the Australian Government funded ‘Restoring Gondwana’ program. Funding vital for wallaby monitoring and research was provided by the Diversicon Foundation. Citation: Sanders, A. (2018). Fitz-Stirling 2007-2017 ten-year evaluation review. Unpublished report for Bush Heritage Australia. P a g e | 2 Contents Overview of Fitz-Stirling Project ........................................................................................................ 6 This report evaluates our conservation impact .................................................................................
    [Show full text]