DOCSLIB.ORG

Flora and Fauna Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flora and Fauna Report Flora and Fauna Report Heathcote Hall Residential Development Prepared for Fuzortinn Pty Ltd 7 December 2017 Heathcote Hall Residential Development - Flora and Fauna Assessment DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Heathcote Hall Residential Development, Flora and Fauna Report Project Number 3199 Karen Spicer Project Manager 8536 8633 Suite 2, Level 3, 668-672 Old Princes Highway, Sutherland NSW 2232 Prepared by Karen Spicer Reviewed by Meredith Henderson and Brian Towle Approved by Beth Medway Status Final Version Number V2 Last saved on 7 December 2017 Cover photo Photos within the study area, K. Spicer 2015 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2017. Heathcote Hall Flora and Fauna Report. Prepared for Fuzortinn Pty Ltd.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from John Innes of Fuzortinn Pty Ltd and Gustavo Thiermann from Ink Architects. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Fuzortinn PL. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Fuzortinn PL by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter. Unauthorised use of this report in any form is prohibited. Template 08/05/2014 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ii Heathcote Hall Residential Development - Flora and Fauna Assessment Contents Limitations statement ............................................................................................................................ vi Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... vii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study area .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Description of project .................................................................................................................... 1 2 Legislative context ..................................................................................................................... 4 3 Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Literature review ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Database searches ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Likelihood of occurrence ............................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Field survey .................................................................................................................................. 6 3.4 Limitations ..................................................................................................................................... 7 4. Existing environment ................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Database and literature review ..................................................................................................... 8 4.1.1 Landscape context ....................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Threatened ecological communities ............................................................................................. 8 4.1.3 Threatened flora ......................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.4 Threatened fauna ....................................................................................................................... 10 4.2 Field survey results ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.2.1 Vegetation communities ............................................................................................................. 10 4.2.2 Flora species .............................................................................................................................. 13 4.2.3 Fauna species ............................................................................................................................ 13 5 Impact assessment .................................................................................................................. 15 5.1 Summary of impacts ................................................................................................................... 15 5.6 Impact assessment – EP&A Act ................................................................................................. 19 5.7 Impact assessment – EPBC Act................................................................................................. 19 5.8 Environmentally Sensitive Land (SSC LEP 2015)...................................................................... 20 5.9 Natural Resource Management (SSC DCP 2015) ..................................................................... 21 6 Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 22 7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 23 References ............................................................................................................................................. 25 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA PTY LTD iii Heathcote Hall Residential Development - Flora and Fauna Assessment Appendix A Likelihood of occurrence ................................................................................................ 27 Appendix B Flora list ............................................................................................................................ 41 Appendix C Incidental fauna observations ........................................................................................ 45 Appendix D Assessments of Significance ......................................................................................... 46 Sydney Turpentine Ironbark Forest (STIF) ............................................................................................. 46 Callocephalon fimbriatum Gang-gang Cockatoo .................................................................................... 49 Microbats: Chalinolobus dwyeri (Large-eared Pied Bat), Falsistrellus tasmaniensis (Eastern False Pipistrelle) and Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis (Eastern Bentwing-bat). ....................................... 52 Pteropus poliocephalus (Grey-headed Flying-fox) .................................................................................. 56 Ninox strenua (Powerful Owl) .................................................................................................................. 59 Appendix E EPBC Act Assessment .................................................................................................... 62 Chalinolobus dwyeri (Large-eared Pied Bat) – vulnerable ...................................................................... 62 Pteropus poliocephalus (Grey-headed Flying-fox, GHFF) ...................................................................... 65 Appendix F Tree hollow replacement plan ......................................................................................... 67 List of figures Figure 1: Locality map of the study area .................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: Proposed development of the study area (Ink Architects 1 December 2017) ........................... 3 Figure 3: SMCMA vegetation mapping of the site and surrounding area (OEH 2013) .............................. 9 Figure 4: Ecological constraints showing validated vegetation mapping and location of hollow-bearing trees (HBTs) ............................................................................................................................................. 12 Figure 5: Proposed ecological impacts resulting from the proposed development ................................. 17 Figure 6: Landscape masterplan (prepared by SiteDesign 17 November 2017) ..................................... 18 Figure 7: Four-chambered bat boxes recommended by Hollow Log Homes (HLH website)................... 71 Figure 8: Location of hollow-bearing trees and proposed location of microbat habitat boxes ................. 72 List of tables Table 1: Noxious weeds and WoNS present in the study area ................................................................ 13 Table 2: Habitat features and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Epbc Protected Matters
    EPBC Act Protected Matters Report This report provides general guidance on matters of national environmental significance and other matters protected by the EPBC Act in the area you have selected. Information on the coverage of this report and qualifications on data supporting this report are contained in the caveat at the end of the report. Information is available about Environment Assessments and the EPBC Act including significance guidelines, forms and application process details. Report created: 08/07/15 18:21:20 Summary Details Matters of NES Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Extra Information Caveat Acknowledgements This map may contain data which are ©Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), ©PSMA 2010 Coordinates Buffer: 10.0Km Summary Matters of National Environmental Significance This part of the report summarises the matters of national environmental significance that may occur in, or may relate to, the area you nominated. Further information is available in the detail part of the report, which can be accessed by scrolling or following the links below. If you are proposing to undertake an activity that may have a significant impact on one or more matters of national environmental significance then you should consider the Administrative Guidelines on Significance. World Heritage Properties: None National Heritage Places: None Wetlands of International Importance: 2 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: None Commonwealth Marine Area: None Listed Threatened Ecological Communities: 6 Listed Threatened Species: 40 Listed Migratory Species: 13 Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act This part of the report summarises other matters protected under the Act that may relate to the area you nominated.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants Will Be Assessed on Their Knowledge of Bats, With
    Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants will be assessed on their knowledge of bats, with an emphasis on North American Bats, South American Microbats, and African MegaBats. A TEAM OF UP TO: 2 APPROXIMATE TIME: 50 minutes 2. EVENT PARAMETERS: a. Each team may bring one 2” or smaller three-ring binder, as measured by the interior diameter of the rings, containing information in any form and from any source. Sheet protectors, lamination, tabs and labels are permitted in the binder. b. If the event features a rotation through a series of stations where the participants interact with samples, specimens or displays; no material may be removed from the binder throughout the event. c. In addition to the binder, each team may bring one unmodified and unannotated copy of either the National Bat List or an Official State Bat list which does not have to be secured in the binder. 3. THE COMPETITION: a. The competition may be run as timed stations and/or as timed slides/PowerPoint presentation. b. Specimens/Pictures will be lettered or numbered at each station. The event may include preserved specimens, skeletal material, and slides or pictures of specimens. c. Each team will be given an answer sheet on which they will record answers to each question. d. No more than 50% of the competition will require giving common or scientific names. e. Participants should be able to do a basic identification to the level indicated on the Official List. States may have a modified or regional list. See your state website.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment Report FINAL
    APPENDIX6 BiodiversityAssessmentReport INVINCIBLE SOUTHERN EXTENSION PROJECT Biodiversity Assessment Report FINAL September 2016 INVINCIBLE SOUTHERN EXTENSION PROJECT Biodiversity Assessment Report FINAL Prepared by Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited on behalf of Castlereagh Coal Project Director: Tim Crosdale Project Manager: David Holmes Technical Director: Allison Riley Technical Manager: Shaun Corry Report No. 3622/R04/FINAL Date: September 2016 Newcastle 75 York Street Teralba NSW 2284 Ph. 02 4950 5322 www.umwelt.com.au This report was prepared using Umwelt’s ISO 9001 certified Quality Management System. Executive Summary Castlereagh Coal operates the Invincible Colliery (Invincible), an open cut coal mine located approximately 25 kilometres north-west of Lithgow in NSW. Castlereagh Coal is the trading name for Shoalhaven Coal Pty Ltd which is part of the Manildra Group, an integrated and diverse agribusiness. Castlereagh Coal is seeking to modify the Invincible Project Approval to extend the life of mining operations at the Invincible Colliery and obtain approval to extend the open cut mining operations to an area immediately south of the existing operations (Southern Extension Area). The primary purpose of the operation will be to provide nut coal to Manildra’s Shoalhaven Starches Plant located at Bomaderry on the NSW South Coast. Project features (including location and setback from potential habitat features) and impact mitigation measures have been incorporated into the detailed design of the Southern Extension Project to minimise biodiversity impacts. Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited (Umwelt) has prepared this Biodiversity Assessment Report on behalf of Castlereagh Coal to assess the potential ecological impacts of the proposed Southern Extension Project using the Framework for Biodiversity Assessment – NSW Biodiversity Offsets Policy for Major Projects (FBA).
    [Show full text]
  • A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    A LIST of the VERTEBRATES of SOUTH AUSTRALIA updates. for Edition 4th Editors See A.C. Robinson K.D. Casperson Biological Survey and Research Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia M.N. Hutchinson South Australian Museum Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, South Australia 2000 i EDITORS A.C. Robinson & K.D. Casperson, Biological Survey and Research, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage. G.P.O. Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001 M.N. Hutchinson, Curator of Reptiles and Amphibians South Australian Museum, Department of Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts. GPO Box 234, Adelaide, SA 5001updates. for CARTOGRAPHY AND DESIGN Biological Survey & Research, Heritage and Biodiversity Division, Department for Environment and Heritage Edition Department for Environment and Heritage 2000 4thISBN 0 7308 5890 1 First Edition (edited by H.J. Aslin) published 1985 Second Edition (edited by C.H.S. Watts) published 1990 Third Edition (edited bySee A.C. Robinson, M.N. Hutchinson, and K.D. Casperson) published 2000 Cover Photograph: Clockwise:- Western Pygmy Possum, Cercartetus concinnus (Photo A. Robinson), Smooth Knob-tailed Gecko, Nephrurus levis (Photo A. Robinson), Painted Frog, Neobatrachus pictus (Photo A. Robinson), Desert Goby, Chlamydogobius eremius (Photo N. Armstrong),Osprey, Pandion haliaetus (Photo A. Robinson) ii _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology and Conservation of the White-Striped Freetail Bat (Tadarida Australis) in Urban Environments
    The Ecology and Conservation of the White-Striped Freetail Bat (Tadarida australis) in Urban Environments Author Rhodes, Monika Published 2006 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Australian School of Environmental Studies DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2960 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367292 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au The Ecology and Conservation of the White-striped freetail bat (Tadarida australis) in Urban Environments Monika Rhodes Diplombiologin (Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany) Australian School of Environmental Studies Faculty of Environmental Sciences Griffith University Australia Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2006 ii Synopsis Of all anthropogenic pressures, urbanisation is one of the most damaging, and is expanding in its influence throughout the world. In Australia, 90% of the human population live in urban centres along the eastern seaboard. Before European settlement in the early 1800s, much of the Australia’s East coast was dominated by forests. Many of the forest dependent fauna have had to adapt to forest fragmentation and habitat loss resulting from clearing for urbanisation. However, relatively few studies have investigated the impact of urbanisation on biodiversity. This is especially true for the remaining fauna in large metropolitan areas, such as Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. The physical and conceptual context of this thesis is the increasing impact of urbanisation and the potentially threatening factors to forest dependent fauna. Bats were selected because they comprise a third of Australia’s mammal species, and therefore form a major component of Australia’s biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Piper Power Station Ash Placement Project
    Mt Piper Power Station Ash Placement Project APPENDIX E FLORA AND FAUNA IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 2010 Mt Piper Power Station Ash Placement Project APPENDIX E FLORA AND FAUNA IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 2010 Sinclair Knight Merz ABN 37 001 024 095 710 Hunter Street Newcastle West NSW 2302 Australia Postal Address PO Box 2147 Dangar NSW 2309 Australia Tel: +61 2 4979 2600 Fax: +61 2 4979 2666 Web: www.skmconsulting.com Flora and Fauna Assessment Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Flora and Fauna Assessment 1 2. Review of Existing Knowledge 2 2.1 Methods: Previous Investigations 2 2.1.1 Results: Flora Assemblage 2 2.1.2 Results: Fauna Assemblage 3 2.2 Database Searches 4 2.2.1 Threatened Flora 5 2.2.2 Threatened Fauna 7 2.2.3 Endangered Ecological Communities 8 3. Concept Approval Areas 10 3.1 Vegetation Communities 10 3.2 Threatened Species 10 3.3 Further Studies 12 4. Project Approval Areas 14 4.1 Methods 14 4.2 Vegetation Communities 16 4.3 Floristic Diversity / Condition 18 4.4 Threatened Flora 18 4.5 Fauna Habitats 20 4.6 Fauna Species 24 4.7 Threatened Fauna 26 5. Impact Assessment 27 5.1.1 Vegetation Clearance 27 5.1.2 Fauna Habitat 27 5.2 Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 28 5.2.1 Critical habitat 28 5.2.2 Endangered Ecological Communities 28 5.2.3 National Park Estate 28 5.2.4 Threatened Flora 28 5.2.5 Threatened Fauna 28 5.3 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999 31 6.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interpretation of Global HCVF Toolkit for Use in Ghana May 2006
    An Interpretation of Global HCVF Toolkit for use in Ghana May 2006 November 2005 Prepared By: Tim Rayden, Ishmael Jesse-Dodoo, Andhers Lindhe and Abraham Baffoe Contact: WWF-WARPO, PMB L.45, Legon, Accra Tel: +233-21-518710 Fax: +233-21-518709 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 4 2. Potential and actual HCVF………………………………………………………………..5 3. HCV 1 Globally regionally or nationally significant concentrations of biodiversity values.......................................................................................................... 5 3.1. HCV 1.1 Protected areas: ............................................................................... 5 3.1.1. Interpretation ............................................................................................. 5 3.1.2. Identification .............................................................................................. 5 3.1.3. Information sources ................................................................................... 5 3.1.4. Suggested management priorities for potential HCVF .............................. 6 3.2. HCV 1.2 Forest that contain outstanding concentrations of threatened or endangered species .................................................................................................... 6 3.2.1. Interpretation ............................................................................................. 6 3.2.2. Identification .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Rare a Rare
    A NEW HOPE TRANSFORMING A TOURIST SITE SCIENCE & EDUCATION INTHE FIGHT AGAINST WNS? INTO A HIGH-TECH BAT HOUSE PROTECT BATS IN RUSSIA WWW.BATCO N.ORG SUMMER 2013 BATSBATSBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL AA RareRare AmazingAmazing&& AfricanAfrican BatBat THE MEMO from our E XECUTIVE D IRECTOR ‘Kiss Mother Nature Goodbye’ o you remember those signs? In the corridor to Austin are not far off. The sky over Bracken decade or two after the first Earth Day in is still pretty dark, the surrounding lands are open and D 1970, it was common to see “Kiss Mother natural – but not for much longer. We’re in a race to Nature Goodbye” scrawled on large, rural protect as much land as possible around land-for-sale signs and on billboards Bracken Cave and other bat maternity promising that a new housing develop- caves in the Hill Country while there’s ment or shopping mall was coming soon. still a little time. I don’t see that kind of graffiti much Our website has all you need to know anymore, but I’m reminded of it every about the current threat to Bracken (see time some favorite piece of woods or pas- page 15 in this issue of BATS) and the ture is rezoned and put up for sale. Hu- many reasons why a proposed manity’s explosion across the landscape development directly under the nightly in the past six decades and the resultant flight path of 10 to 15 million bats is a loss of thousands of plant and animal species, even bad idea.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of the Bat Fauna
    __________________________________________________________________________________ Monitoring of the microbat fauna of the Ulan Coal Mine lease during 2015. Microbat Monitoring of the Ulan Coal Mine Lease during 2015 A report to Ulan Coal Mines Limited G.A. Hoye & M.M. Hoye Fly By Night Bat Surveys Pty Ltd ABN 48 068 562 005 PO Box 271 BELMONT NSW 2280 Tel 4947 7794 Fax 4947 7537 January 2016 January 2016 Fly By Night Bat Surveys Pty Ltd __________________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________________________________________________________________ Monitoring of the microbat fauna of the Ulan Coal Mine lease during 2015. 1 INTRODUCTION This report details the results of microbat monitoring undertaken during 2015 in accordance with the Biodiversity Management Plan (BMP) (ULN SD PLN 0026). The Project Area comprises a total of 13,435 hectares and includes areas referred to in the Environmental Assessment (Umwelt 2009) and the subsequent BMP. This area consists of the Ulan West and No. 3 underground areas, as well as the open cut. They include; Open Cut Extension – the extent of the recently approved open cut operations, being approximately 239 hectares; Previous Open Cut Mining Areas – covers approximately 475 hectares of previously open cut mining areas that have been rehabilitated and final voids that remain to support future mining activities (i.e. water storage, tailings disposal, underground access etc.); Surface Infrastructure Area – the 169 hectare disturbance area required for construction of underground service infrastructure; Residual Project Area – the remainder of the Project Area that is not subject to the current project. This includes large areas that have been previously undermined, agricultural grazing land, irrigation pivots and large areas of remnant native vegetation; Biodiversity Offset and Management Areas – land that has been approved for Biodiversity Offset and Management Areas for the Project, being: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessment for Rezoning of the North Ryde Station Precinct Report ADP-1207-ECO-01
    Ecological Assessment for the Rezoning of North Ryde Station Precinct Ecological Assessment for Rezoning of the North Ryde Station Precinct Report ADP-1207-ECO-01 Prepared for Transport for NSW st 1 August 2011 © ECO LOGICAL AUSTRALIA P T Y L T D i Ecological Assessment for the Rezoning of North Ryde Station Precinct DOCUMENT TRACKING ITEM DETAIL Project Name Ecological Assessment for Rezoning: North Ryde Station Precinct Project Number 11SYDECO-0039 Transport for ADP-1207-ECO NSW project G:\Synergy\Projects\11SYDECO\11SYDECO-0039 North Ryde TOD 3A Ecological File location Assessment\Report\Draft Reports Prepared by Enhua Lee, Danielle Bennett Approved by David Bonjer Status Final Version Number 05 Last saved on 21 November 2012 Clockwise from top left: OSL site, northern part of RMS site, watercourse near Wicks Road, Cover photo northern part of M2 site. Photos by Danielle Bennett, July 2011. This report should be cited as „Eco Logical Australia 2012. Ecological Assessment for Rezoning of the North Ryde Station Precinct. Prepared for Transport for NSW.‟ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Transport for NSW and Erin Saunders of Urbis. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and the Transport for NSW. The scope of services was defined in consultation with the Transport for NSW, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Biology of Bats: Invasive Threats, Research Effort, and Extinction Risk
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2017 Conservation Biology of Bats: Invasive Threats, Research Effort, and Extinction Risk Jessica Nicole Welch University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Welch, Jessica Nicole, "Conservation Biology of Bats: Invasive Threats, Research Effort, and Extinction Risk. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2017. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4508 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Jessica Nicole Welch entitled "Conservation Biology of Bats: Invasive Threats, Research Effort, and Extinction Risk." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Daniel Simberloff, Gary McCracken, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Brian O'Meara, Alison Boyer, Mike McKinney Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Conservation Biology of Bats: Invasive Threats, Research Effort, and Extinction Risk A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jessica Nicole Welch May 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Jessica Nicole Welch.
    [Show full text]