Coral Cay Conservation Proposed Marine Protected Area Report Gudan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coral Cay Conservation Proposed Marine Protected Area Report Gudan Coral Cay Conservation Proposed Marine Protected Area Report Gudan Liloan, Southern Leyte, Philippines August 2015 Head of Science: Alex Ferguson, [email protected] Project Scientist: Shannon Cameron, [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................ 6 CORAL CAY CONSERVATION ................................................................................................. 7 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and Marine Reserves (MRs) .................................................... 8 1.2 Coral Reefs & Marine Conservation in the Philippines ............................................................. 10 1.3 Characterisation of Study Region .............................................................................................. 12 1.3.1 Southern Leyte and Sogod Bay ............................................................................................. 12 1.3.2 Barangay Gudan, Proposed MPA site .................................................................................. 12 2. METHODS ............................................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Survey Site .................................................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Biophysical Survey ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.1 Fish ....................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 Invertebrates ........................................................................................................................ 15 2.2.3 Substrate .............................................................................................................................. 15 2.2.4 Impacts ................................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Data Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 16 3. RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................... 17 3.1. Fish ............................................................................................................................................. 17 3.2 Invertebrates .............................................................................................................................. 21 3.3 Substrate..................................................................................................................................... 22 3.4 Anthropogenic Impacts .............................................................................................................. 23 3.5 Qualitative Assessment of ‘Olly’s Wall’ ..................................................................................... 24 3.5.1 Fish ....................................................................................................................................... 24 3.5.2 Invertebrates ........................................................................................................................ 24 3.5.3 Substrates............................................................................................................................. 24 3.5.4 Anthropogenic Impacts ........................................................................................................ 24 4. VISUAL ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................... 25 5. DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................................................... 27 5.1 Fish .............................................................................................................................................. 27 5.3 Substrates ................................................................................................................................... 29 1 | P a g e © Coral Cay Conservation 2013 6. RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 32 6.1 Recommended Scenarios for Gudans Marine Protected Area ................................................. 33 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................ 36 APPENDIX: TARGET SPECIES LISTS ............................................................................. 38 2 | P a g e © Coral Cay Conservation 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Coral Cay Conservation (CCC) conducted an assessment of the reef fish, invertebrates, substrates and anthropogenic impacts at the Barangay Gudan in the Municipality of Liloan. The site has been proposed as a potential Marine Protected Area (MPA). An enhanced Reef Check methodology was used to complete biophysical surveys of four 100m transects, each containing four 20m replicates. Transects were equally divided between depths of 6m and 12m. A qualitative assessment was carried out at the popular dive site ‘Olly’s Wall’ which, due to the gradient of the slope, is unsuitable for Reef Check survey methodology. Fish abundance was highest at transect three, with significantly more fish than transects one and two. There were no significant differences in fish diversity between transects. Abundance of fish observed at ‘Olly’s Wall’ was low, however diversity was high with almost all target species recorded. Commercially important species of Parrotfish, Groupers and Snappers were recorded in low abundance across the site with no individuals greater than 30cm in length. Grouper were entirely absent from transects one and three; those recorded were all less than 20cm in length. The highest abundance of commercially important fish families was recorded at transect two. Invertebrate abundance was significantly highest at transects three and four. Invertebrate diversity did not significantly differ between transects. Abundance and diversity of invertebrates at ‘Olly’s Wall’ was very high, with almost all target species recorded. Rare sightings of fish and invertebrates across the site included a blue-spotted ribbontail ray, giant frogfish, spotted eagle ray and flamboyant cuttlefish. Sand was the most commonly recorded substrate recorded during the biophysical survey followed by rock and hard coral. Transects two and four had the highest percentage cover of hard coral, although this was still relatively low in comparison to a ‘healthy’ reef. The same transects also offered a high percentage cover of rock. ‘Olly’s Wall’ yielded a wide variety of substrates, the most abundantly observed were anemones, followed by soft coral, black (whip) coral and hard coral. Anthropogenic impacts were observed to be moderate – high. A high abundance of fishing and general trash was recorded both during the biophysical survey and qualitative assessment of ‘Olly’s Wall’. Coral damage was also observed upon occasion. 3 | P a g e © Coral Cay Conservation 2013 The low abundance and complete absence of some commercially important fish and invertebrate species indicates that fishing pressures are too high to sustain a healthy population. This is a threat both to the reef and the community of the Barangay Gudan. Based on the results of this survey, three MPA implementation scenarios have been outlined ranging between the highest and lowest chance of success; all scenarios would benefit from the inclusion of marine reserve buffer zones restricting all but hook and line fishing. It is recommended that consultation be started between the local community, municipal and provincial government and CCC on the creation of a marine protected area. 4 | P a g e © Coral Cay Conservation 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Coral Cay Conservation would like to express our gratitude to the Provincial Government of Southern Leyte (PGSL). Our work would not be possible without the support of the Provincial Environmental and Natural Resource Management Office (PENRMO), the Provincial Tourism Office and other members of the PGSL. We would also like to thank the Barangay Council of Gudan and the Municipality of Liloan for facilitating the MPA assessment. In particular we would like to acknowledge the cooperation of Ma’am Benita Dipay, Liloan Municipal Agricultural Technician and the honourable Captain Albert, Barangay Captain of Gudan. We would also like to thank our trained volunteers, staff and scholars who collected vital data during this proposed MPA assessment. 5 | P a g e © Coral Cay Conservation 2013 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CCC : Coral Cay Conservation CoTs : Crown of Thorns Seastars (Ancanthaster planci) IEC : Information and Education Campaign IUCN : International Union for the Conservation of Nature LGU :
Recommended publications
  • 7. Index of Scientific and Vernacular Names
    Cephalopods of the World 249 7. INDEX OF SCIENTIFIC AND VERNACULAR NAMES Explanation of the System Italics : Valid scientific names (double entry by genera and species) Italics : Synonyms, misidentifications and subspecies (double entry by genera and species) ROMAN : Family names ROMAN : Scientific names of divisions, classes, subclasses, orders, suborders and subfamilies Roman : FAO names Roman : Local names 250 FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 4, Vol. 1 A B Acanthosepion pageorum .....................118 Babbunedda ................................184 Acanthosepion whitleyana ....................128 bandensis, Sepia ..........................72, 138 aculeata, Sepia ............................63–64 bartletti, Blandosepia ........................138 acuminata, Sepia..........................97,137 bartletti, Sepia ............................72,138 adami, Sepia ................................137 bartramii, Ommastrephes .......................18 adhaesa, Solitosepia plangon ..................109 bathyalis, Sepia ..............................138 affinis, Sepia ...............................130 Bathypolypus sponsalis........................191 affinis, Sepiola.......................158–159, 177 Bathyteuthis .................................. 3 African cuttlefish..............................73 baxteri, Blandosepia .........................138 Ajia-kouika .................................. 115 baxteri, Sepia.............................72,138 albatrossae, Euprymna ........................181 belauensis, Nautilus .....................51,53–54
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cuttlefish a Model Organism to Study Travelling Waves in Biological Systems 4 August 2014
    Tropical cuttlefish a model organism to study travelling waves in biological systems 4 August 2014 several millions of them. The size of each chromatophore can be rapidly and individually altered by neural activation of radial muscles. If those muscles relax, their chromatophore shrinks. If they contract, the chromatophore grows larger. One form of cephalopod pigmentation pattern is the passing cloud – a dark band that travels across the body of the animal. It can be superimposed on various static body patterns and textures. The passing cloud results from the coordinated activation of chromatophore arrays to generate one, or as in the present case, several simultaneous traveling waves of pigmentation. The tropical cuttlefish Metasepia tullbergi proves to be a suitable model organism to investigate the possible neural mechanisms underlying these The cuttlefish Metasepia tullbergi is not only extremely passing clouds. Using high-speed video cameras colourful, it can also generate colour waves traveling with 50 or 100 frames per second, the scientists across its body. Credit: Stephan Junek from the Max Planck Institute for Brain Research observed that the mantle of Metasepia contains four regions of wave travel on each half of the Some cephalopods are masters of display: Not body. Each region supports a different propagation only can they adapt their skin colour to their direction with the waves remaining within the immediate environment, thereby merging with the boundaries of a given region. The animal then uses background, they can also produce propagating different combinations of such regions of wave colour waves along their body. These so-called travel to produce different displays.
    [Show full text]
  • This Cuttlefish Dazzles Internet Chatter Suggests That the Flamboyant Cuttlefish—Known for Ambling Along the Seafloor and Flashing Brilliant Displays—Is Toxic
    SCI CANDY This Cuttlefish Dazzles Internet chatter suggests that the flamboyant cuttlefish—known for ambling along the seafloor and flashing brilliant displays—is toxic. What does the science say? by Julie Leibach, on June 22, 2016 ​ ​ The flamboyant cuttlefish (Metasepia pfeffer) is one of the species featured in the "Tentacles” exhibition at the Monterey Bay Aquarium. © Monterey Bay Aquarium Have you ever seen a cuttlefish walk? If you stop by the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s “Tentacles” exhibit, you might. The aquarium is one of a ​ ​ handful in the country to display flamboyant cuttlefish (Metasepia pfefferi), a diminutive species of cephalopod that often forgoes swimming to crawl, army-style, along the seafloor (or the bottom of a ​ ​ tank). “They kinda lumber around on four appendages,” says Bret Grasse, who manages the cephalopods in the aquarium’s exhibit. Those appendages include two large arms and portions of the cuttlefish’s mantle, which it extends “to provide what looks like two projected legs,” he explains. Grasse hypothesizes that the behavior could have something to do with the size of the flamboyant cuttlefish’s cuttlebone, a calcium carbonate structure in the upper portion of the mantle cavity. Cuttlefishes fill chambers in their cuttlebone with air or water to control their buoyancies in order to swim up, or lower down, in the water column. WWW.SCIENCEFRIDAY.COM But M. pfefferi’s cuttlebone “is very small and narrow relative to their body size” (adults grow about three inches, max), says Grasse. Those dimensions might not support much buoyancy, and thus the species might prefer shuffling over surfaces, he suggests.
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass-Reef Ecosystem Connectivity of Fish and Invertebrate Communities in Zamboanguita, Philippines
    Seagrass-reef ecosystem connectivity of fish and invertebrate communities in Zamboanguita, Philippines Naomi Westlake BSc. Marine Biology 2020/21 Project Advisor: Dr Stacey DeAmicis SEAGRASS-REEF CONNECTIVITY IN THE PHILIPPINES Seagrass-reef ecosystem connectivity of fish and invertebrate communities in Zamboanguita, Philippines Westlake, Naomi School of Science and Engineering, University of Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA [email protected] ABSTRACT Seagrass meadows are important coastal marine ecosystems that are frequently found in close proximity to coral reefs, and temporarily play host to a wide range of reef species for many reasons. Seagrass populations are declining globally, and these losses pose a great risk to areas such as South- East Asia where the livelihoods of people are heavily dependent on seagrass-reef systems. Hence, seagrass ecosystem management within these regions is extremely important. The aim of this study was to gain a greater understanding of seagrass-reef ecosystem connectivity within the Indo-Pacific, and to use findings to inform future marine reserve planning in the region. Visual census belt surveys (n = 140) were conducted within the Seagrass, Interface and Reef zones of three Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Zamboanguita, Philippines, with fish and invertebrate communities compared across zones. Species diversity trends varied across sites, as did fish abundance, fish biomass, and fish community composition trends. For Malatapay and Lutoban South MPAs, fish assemblages did not differ across zones, and Seagrass and Reef zones shared approximately 20 % of species, indicating high ecosystem connectivity. Presumed habitat uses by fish at these sites include foraging and nursery grounds, as well as potential breeding by a pair of longface emperors.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Key Species Groups in the East Marine Region
    Australian Museum Description of Key Species Groups in the East Marine Region Final Report – September 2007 1 Table of Contents Acronyms........................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Images ................................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................ 6 2 Corals (Scleractinia)............................................................................................................ 12 3 Crustacea ............................................................................................................................. 24 4 Demersal Teleost Fish ........................................................................................................ 54 5 Echinodermata..................................................................................................................... 66 6 Marine Snakes ..................................................................................................................... 80 7 Marine Turtles...................................................................................................................... 95 8 Molluscs ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genus-Level Phylogeny of Cephalopods Using Molecular Markers: Current Status and Problematic Areas
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchOnline at James Cook University Genus-level phylogeny of cephalopods using molecular markers: current status and problematic areas Gustavo Sanchez1,2, Davin H.E. Setiamarga3,4, Surangkana Tuanapaya5, Kittichai Tongtherm5, Inger E. Winkelmann6, Hannah Schmidbaur7, Tetsuya Umino1, Caroline Albertin8, Louise Allcock9, Catalina Perales-Raya10, Ian Gleadall11, Jan M. Strugnell12, Oleg Simakov2,7 and Jaruwat Nabhitabhata13 1 Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan 2 Molecular Genetics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, Japan 3 Department of Applied Chemistry and Biochemistry, National Institute of Technology—Wakayama College, Gobo City, Wakayama, Japan 4 The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan 5 Department of Biology, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand 6 Section for Evolutionary Genomics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 7 Department of Molecular Evolution and Development, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 8 Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America 9 Department of Zoology, Martin Ryan Marine Science Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland 10 Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain 11 Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Tohoku, Japan 12 Marine Biology & Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 13 Excellence Centre for Biodiversity of Peninsular Thailand, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand ABSTRACT Comprising more than 800 extant species, the class Cephalopoda (octopuses, squid, Submitted 19 June 2017 cuttlefish, and nautiluses) is a fascinating group of marine conchiferan mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation for Marine Environments by Locomotive Tunic Structure in Cuttlefish
    Tropical Natural History 20(2): 162–168, August 2020 2020 by Chulalongkorn University Adaptation for Marine Environments by Locomotive Tunic Structure in Cuttlefish AYANO OMURA Department of Art, Nihon University College of Art, 2-42-1, Asahigaoka Nerima-ku, Tokyo, 176-8525, JAPAN * Corresponding author. Ayano Omura ([email protected]) Received: 27 October 2019; Accepted: 2 March 2020 ABSTRACT.– Cephalopods have higher motility and more widely distributed in the ocean than other marine invertebrates. Especially members of the family Sepiidae have diverse habitats and locomotory modes. There are inner and outer tunics in the mantle, and the mantle muscle is sandwiched by inner and outer tunics. Their mantle is used for locomotion and respiration, and the tunics of the mantle supports its movements. However, the relationship between the tunic structure and habitats/locomotive modes of cuttlefish remains unclear. In this study, we made histological observations of the outer tunics of three species of Sepiidae with different locomotory modes and quantified the percentages of different collagen types (type Ⅰ collagen: contributing tissue elasticity, type Ⅲ collagen: contributing tissue flexibility). The structure and the collagen types of the outer tunic were related to the habitats and locomotory modes of Sepiidae. In Metasepia tullbergi, which walks on the sea bottom in shallow waters, the outer tunic has a reticular structure that mostly consists of type III collagen. This species’ tunic is suitable for walking in shallower water. In Sepia kobiensis, which swims in deeper depth, the tunic has an oriented layer structure composed of type Ⅰ collagen. This structure is suitable for swimming under higher water pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media and Citizen Science Provide Valuable Data for Behavioural Ecology Research: Are Cuttlefish Using Pursuit-Deterrent Signals During Hunting?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/760926; this version posted September 8, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Social Media and citizen science provide valuable data for behavioural ecology research: Are cuttlefish using pursuit-deterrent signals during hunting? Dražen Gordon, Philip Pugh and *Gavan M Cooke Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom. *Corresponding author Abstract Obtaining robust, analysable data sets from wild marine animals is fraught with difficulties, dangers, expense, often without success. Scientists are becoming increasingly reliant on citizen scientists to help fill in gaps where they exist, especially in the area of biodiversity. Here, uniquely, we use social media and citizen science videos to investigate the behavioural ecology of hunting in five cuttlefish species - Metasepia pfefferi (N = 24), Sepia apama (N = 13), Sepia latimanus (N = 8), Sepia officinalis (N = 17), and Sepia pharaonis (N = 23). We find that hunting strategies and prey type differ between species as do the types of behaviours used by the five species studied here. We also use kinematic permutation analysis to elucidate chains of behaviours, finding that cuttlefish significantly use a mixture of predator behaviours but also prey-like behaviours, such as warning signals and possibly even a ‘pursuit-deterrent signal’ during the final moments of hunting. We also show and discuss significant intraspecific differences. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/760926; this version posted September 8, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Skin Patterns in Cephalopods
    How, M. , Norman, M., Finn, J., Chung, W-S., & Marshall, N. J. (2017). Dynamic Skin Patterns in Cephalopods. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, [393]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00393 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.3389/fphys.2017.00393 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Frontiers Media at http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2017.00393/full. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 19 June 2017 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00393 Dynamic Skin Patterns in Cephalopods Martin J. How 1*, Mark D. Norman 2 †, Julian Finn 2 †, Wen-Sung Chung 3 and N. Justin Marshall 3 1 Ecology of Vision Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 2 Marine Sciences, Museum Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 3 Sensory Neurobiology Group, Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia Cephalopods are unrivaled in the natural world in their ability to alter their visual appearance. These mollusks have evolved a complex system of dermal units under neural, hormonal, and muscular control to produce an astonishing variety of body patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Cephalopoda Primary Types
    Ver. 2 March 2017 RECENT CEPHALOPOD PRIMARY TYPE SPECIMENS: A SEARCHING TOOL Compiled by Michael J. Sweeney Introduction. This document was first initiated for my personal use as a means to easily find data associated with the ever growing number of Recent cephalopod primary types. (Secondary types (paratypes, etc) are not included due to the large number of specimens involved.) With the excellent resources of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution and the help of many colleagues, it grew in size and became a resource to share with others. Along the way, several papers were published that addressed some of the problems that were impeding research in cephalopod taxonomy. A common theme in each paper was the need to locate and examine types when publishing taxonomic descriptions; see Voss (1977:575), Okutani (2005:46), Norman and Hochberg (2005b:147). These publications gave me the impetus to revive the project and make it readily available. I would like to thank the many individuals who assisted me with their time and knowledge, especially Clyde Roper, Mike Vecchione, Eric Hochberg and Mandy Reid. Purpose. This document should be used as an aid for finding the location of types, type names, data, and their publication citation. It is not to be used as an authority in itself or to be cited as such. The lists below will change over time as more research is published and ambiguous names are resolved. It is only a search aid and data from this document should be independently verified prior to publication. My hope is that this document will make research easier and faster for the user.
    [Show full text]
  • Camouflage Connoisseurs
    90 Spotlight A tiny crinoid cuttlefish (possibly Sepia papuensis) less than 1cm long hides among the polyps of a Xenia soft coral. INDO-PACIFICINDO-PACIFIC CUTTLEFISHCUTTLEFISH CAMOUFLAGECAMOUFLAGE CONNOISSEURSCONNOISSEURS From tiny to large, often very colorful but not easy to identify correctly, always stupendously adept at disappearing at will in their marine environment GOOGLE EARTH COORDINATES HERE 91 Identifying small cuttlefish in the field is a difficult task - this might be a baby TEXT BY ANDREA FERRARI Broadclub PHOTOS BY ANDREA & ANTONELLA FERRARI cuttlefish Sepia latimanus or an adult Sepia cf mestus. ay “Sotong” and most people in SSE Asia will immediately think “Yum yum”. But translate that to “cuttlefish” and most experienced divers and underwater photographers will go “Wow”. It’s a fact: these camouflaged cephalopods are among the most fascinating critters of the reef. Curiously shaped – the Class name means “footed head” in Latin – incredibly adept at changing body shape and color with lightning speed and exceptionally intelligent, these common mollusks never cease to amaze those patient enough to stop for a while and try interacting with them while on a dive on tropical reefs. Powerful, stealthy and cunning predators, they are in turn hunted and eaten by large morays, reef whitetip sharks and large groupers. COMMON BUT CAMOUFLAGED Cuttlefish are quite common and are often encountered in shallow water, especially the two largest Indo-Pacific species, the Broadclub Sepia latimanus and the Pharaoh Sepia pharaonis – which look rather similar and are often confused underwater by novice divers: both can reach an impressive size with a length of about 40 centimeters in the largest specimens.
    [Show full text]