A Weapon of Mass Destruction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Weapon of Mass Destruction A Weapon Of Mass Destruction on a circuitous path that ended in the filthy little warren “Ladies and gentlemen, we got him.” outside Tikrit in December of that fateful year. The Iraqi strongman’s lack of military acumen was best summarized by the blunt-speaking American commander who oversaw hen Ambassador L. Paul Bremer III said those the demolition of the Iraqi forces in the 1990–91 Gulf War, words to the press in a packed conference GEN H. Norman Schwarz kopf Jr.: “As far as Saddam Hus - room in Baghdad on De - sein being a great military strategist: cember 14, 2003, all as - He is neither a strategist, nor is he sembled knew exactly schooled in the operational arts, nor is Wwho was meant by “him.” Bremer was he a tactician, nor is he a general, nor referring to Saddam Hussein, erstwhile is he a soldier. Other than that, he’s a president of Iraq, dictator of Mesopo- great military man.” tamia, chieftain of the Baathist Party, Although his foreign enemies rou - scourge of the Kurds, invader of tinely had their way with Saddam and Kuwait, raper of women, impaler of his cowed, ramshackle Iraqi armed men, Josef Stalin to his terrified coun - forces, things were much different in - trymen, and Benito Mussolini to his side the country. Saddam and his foreign foes—especially the Ameri - henchmen may not have fared well cans. He was a vile one, this Saddam against the U.S. Army’s 1st Armored Hussein, America’s enemy in two wars. Division, but the Republican Guard Just who was this unkempt, bedrag - The Outpost battalions proved quite able in wiping gled figure fished out of a “spider out villages. On Saddam’s orders, ap - hole” in the dirt? He reflected a pretty proximately 250,000 men, women and common type in every Iraqi town: a By LTG Daniel P. Bolger children were tortured, disembow - heavyset, bearded, middle-aged man. U.S. Army retired eled, garroted, gassed, buried alive or This one, though, was different—and simply shot with pistols, rifles, ma - not in a good way. chine guns and field artillery. When it came to killing his Eight months before, he had ruled Iraq with a hand of own, Saddam ranked right up there with the most vicious iron. The image of Saddam Hussein Abd al-Majid al-Tikriti mass murderers of the past century—Adolf Hitler, Stalin glowered from every street corner in the country. His jowly, and Mao Zedong. The “Butcher of Baghdad” was not the mustachioed visage reminded more than 25 million Iraqis weapon of mass destruction we sought in the early 2000s, that their lives were in his grasping hands. He was not but Saddam killed far more Iraqis than all the nerve gas, averse to squeezing hard. anthrax and yellowcake uranium of our darkest fantasies. While Saddam often appeared in uniform, he turned out He was all too real and all too present. to be laughably inept as a conqueror. The Israelis manhan - Along with massacring his countrymen, Saddam enjoyed dled his expeditionary brigades in the October War of 1973. cooperative, cordial and cozy relations with many terror When he masterminded an attack on neighboring Iran in networks. It was all of a piece with his customary methods: September 1980, even the incompetent Iranians initially brutally cruel to the defenseless innocent, abjectly craven in proved too tough and too numerous. True, Saddam’s blus - front of the armed and dangerous. Iraq bankrolled and tering Republican Guard overran tiny Kuwait in 1990, but sheltered the Abu Nidal group, the Palestine Liberation then they backpedaled as fast as they went in, courtesy of a Front, and a man named Abu Musab al-Zarqawi (who later massive, violent riposte led by American airpower and ar - became a vital al Qaeda leader), among many others. When mored divisions. Saddam’s legions melted away during the al Qaeda terrorist teams seized four airliners and attacked 2003 American incursion, propelling him and his inner circle the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, December 2013 I ARMY 49 gency that gradually built up in the summer of 2003. After all, the dictator organized his Fedayeen Saddam guer - rilla cells as the U.S. offensive loomed. While the conventional Iraqi battal - ions evaporated after some desultory exchanges of fire, the Fedayeen hung in there with AK-47s, rocket-propelled grenades, roadside bombs and the im - provised explosive devices that be - came the signature weapons of our foes. It only made sense that Saddam might well be pulling the strings on t t this shadowy conspiracy from his spi - e n n e der hole. Getting Saddam became an B d i essential goal. He was the white whale, v a D the Moby Dick whose demise would G S S surely deflate the opposition and end / y m r the insurgency. None of it was true, but A . S . nobody knew that, not yet. So we tried. U Above, a soldier with the 1st Brigade Com - ovies and television shows bat Team, 4th Infantry Division (Mecha - routinely show our mili - nized), lifts the Styrofoam lid covering Sad - tary and police tracking dam Hussein’s dirt “spider hole” near his notorious miscreants all hometown of Tikrit, Iraq, in December over the world. In real 2003. The captured former Iraqi ruler, right, Mlife—as opposed to the “reel” world— was unkempt, bedraggled and disoriented. it is much harder to find individuals, especially those on the run among hos - 2001, some senior U.S. officials imme - tile populations, playing out that old diately suspected Saddam. While cer - Monty Python sketch “How Not to tainly sympathetic to al Qaeda’s cause, Be Seen.” In their day, Confederate Saddam and his organizations were President Jefferson Davis, presidential not directly involved. The Iraqi track assassin John Wilkes Booth, Apache record promised future mayhem, Chief Geronimo, Philippine insurrecto though—especially if Saddam could Emilio Aguinaldo, Mexican raider arm his clandestine hit squads with Pancho Villa, Panamanian Gen. y powerful nuclear, biological or chemi - m Manuel Noriega, Somali warlord Mo - r A . cal weapons. After 9/11, America was S hamed Farrah Aidid, Serbian com - . not in the mood to absorb the first U mander Mlado Radic, and al Qaeda blow. On March 16, 2003, following ample Iraqi provoca - front man Osama bin Laden all eluded capture. Some were tions and equally ample misunderstandings of intelligence found, but many were not. threads emanating from the region, America and its part - In 2003, man-tracking was not as fully developed as it ners acted. Baghdad fell on April 9. The maximum leader would be a few years later. American special operations and his immediate circle went on the lam. forces had honed their tactics in Somalia, the Balkans and Beguiled by murky, incomplete information, some as - other theaters. Even so, finding one Iraqi man, even one as sumed that Saddam was running the anti-American insur - seemingly well-known as Saddam Hussein, was no easy matter. Not every Iraqi really recognized him, as his public LTG Daniel P. Bolger , USA Ret., was the commander of Com - portraits always showed him as younger and more good- bined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan and NATO looking. Moreover, few Iraqis really wanted to help the Training Mission-Afghanistan. Previously, he served as the Americans. Anti-American insurgents were especially ac - deputy chief of staff, G-3/5/7, and as the commanding general, tive in the Saddam family holdings around Tikrit. While 1st Cavalry Division/commanding general, Multinational Divi - few of these disparate groups had any love for the deposed sion-Baghdad, Operation Iraqi Freedom. He holds a doctorate in president, most hated the Americans more. For Iraqis, it Russian history from the University of Chicago and has pub - was far smarter to hang back, stay uninvolved and let lished a number of books on military subjects. things play out. 50 ARMY I December 2013 The toppling of Saddam Hussein’s oversize statue in Baghdad’s Firdos Square in April 2003 symbolized Iraq’s liberation from a brutal dicta - tor who had ruled for more than three decades. y a l e D e m o r e J / s s e r P d e t a i c o s s A o the special operators, backed by conventional B. Hickey’s 1st Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division forces, got to work. It took months of searching, (Mechanized), the special operators had the right partners. fighting and chasing false trails into dry holes. COL Hickey’s soldiers kept up the daily pressure of foot Some of the pieces came through technical means. patrols and raids, while the special ops elements continued Documents and garbage furnished clues. Other to strike at the highest value targets. Sessential facts were grunted out by dejected detainees after On December 13, a detainee taken in Baghdad coughed long rounds of questioning. It’s an old mantra that good up Saddam’s hiding site. The U.S. soldiers had heard that units fight for information. In 2003, the U.S. Army had a lot one before—the white whale, Elvis, Bigfoot, you name it— of good units, and they did just that. but this one smelled different. It seemed right. As in Mo - The first break came on July 22, 2003, when a patrol from sul, the line units set the cordon. The special mission peo - the 101st Airborne Division cornered Saddam’s sons, Uday ple took the objective. After some poking around, they and Qusay, in Mosul. The air assault riflemen secured the pulled up a block of styrofoam in the center of a dust floor.
Recommended publications
  • 1989 Meeting Between Saddam and Senior Iraqi Officials Discussing The
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified 1989 Meeting between Saddam and Senior Iraqi Officials Discussing the Execution of British Journalist Farzad Bazoft, Modifications to Iraq's Constitution, and an Israeli Attack on Iraq's Nuclear Reactor Citation: “Meeting between Saddam and Senior Iraqi Officials Discussing the Execution of British Journalist Farzad Bazoft, Modifications to Iraq's Constitution, and an Israeli Attack on Iraq's Nuclear Reactor,” 1989, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Conflict Records Research Center, National Defense University, SH-SHTP-A-000-910 http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/110542 Summary: Transcript of a meeting between Saddam Hussein and his officials to discuss changes to the Iraqi constitution. Also includes discussion about British Journalist Farzad Bazoft who was arrested as an Iranian spy working for Israel and Britain. Original Language: Arabic Contents: English Translation “Meeting between Saddam and Senior Iraqi Officials Discussing the Execution of British Journalist Farzad Bazoft, Modifications to Iraq's Constitution, and an Israeli Attack on Iraq's Nuclear Reactor” Document Date: Undated (sometime after 1989) CRRC Record Number: SH-SHTP-A-000-910 SH-SHTP-A-000-910 Key: UM = Unidentified Male Speaker Translator Comments, clarifications, and additions are italicized in brackets. Saddam Hussein: [This conversation was already in progress] All of you must circulate the summary of this spy issue to our ambassadors immediately. Tariq Aziz: Yes, [inaudible]. Saddam Hussein: You should deal with them [British reporter Farzad Bazoft and British nurse Daphne Parish] normally. In brief, he [Bazoft] is an Israeli spy; I mean he is an Israeli spy working for the British.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Profile
    MODERN CONFLICTS: CONFLICT PROFILE Iraq (Kurds) (1961 - 1996) The Kurds are an ethnic group in northern Iraq and neighboring Turkey and Iran. There are longstanding conflicts between the Kurds and the governments of all three countries (see also Turkey-Kurds conflict profile). Sustained warfare between the Iraqi government and Kurdish fighters dates from 1961. In the first phase of the war, the Iraqi government controlled the cities and major towns, while Kurdish peshmerga fighters controlled the mountains. Iraq used aerial bombardment while the Kurds relied mainly on guerrilla tactics. An agreement that would have granted autonomy to the Kurds in was almost signed in >> MODERN CONFLICTS 1970, but the two parties could not agree to the division of oil rights and the fighting HOME PAGE resumed. With increased support from the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and the Iranian government, the Kurds escalated the war. In 1975, when the CIA and Iran cut off >> CONFLICTS MAP their support, the Kurdish forces were significantly weakened. This phase of the war was >> CONFLICTS TABLE characterized by mass displacements, summary executions, and other gross human rights >> PERI HOME PAGE violations. In 1979, when Saddam Hussein became president of Iraq, he intensified the repression against the Kurds. Though Kurds resisted, large-scale fighting did not resume until the mid-1980s when Iran, now fighting its own war with Iraq, renewed support for the peshmerga. In 1987, Saddam Hussein appointed his cousin, General Ali Hassan al-Majid, to subdue the Kurds. “Chemical Ali,” as he came to be known because of his use of chemical weapons, launched the Anfal campaign that resulted in the deaths of approximately 100,000 Kurds, the displacement of hundreds of thousands of others, and the destruction of more than 2,000 Kurdish villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Refugee Status Appeals Authority New Zealand
    REFUGEE STATUS APPEALS AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND REFUGEE APPEAL NO 76505 AT AUCKLAND Before: B L Burson (Chairperson) S A Aitchison (Member) Counsel for the Appellant: D Mansouri-Rad Appearing for the Department of Labour: No Appearance Date of Hearing: 3 & 4 May 2010 Date of Decision: 14 June 2010 DECISION [1] This is an appeal against the decision of a refugee status officer of the Refugee Status Branch (RSB) of the Department of Labour (DOL) declining refugee status to the appellant, a national of Iraq. INTRODUCTION [2] The appellant claims to have a well-founded fear of being persecuted in Iraq on account of his former Ba’ath Party membership in the rank of Naseer Mutakadim, and due to his father’s position as Branch Member of the al-Amed Organisation for the Ba’ath Party in City A. He fears persecution at the hands of members of the Mahdi Army – a Shi’a militia group in Iraq, the police who collaborate with them, and the Iraqi Government that is infiltrated by militias. [3] The principal issues to be determined in this appeal are the well- foundedness of the appellant’s fears and whether he can genuinely access meaningful domestic protection. 2 THE APPELLANT’S CASE [4] What follows is a summary of the appellant’s evidence in support of his claim. It will be assessed later in this decision. Background [5] The appellant is a single man in his early-30s. He was born in Suburb A in City A. He is one of three children, the youngest of two boys.
    [Show full text]
  • Hd122-Xxx.Ps
    1 108th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 108–122 BLOCKING PROPERTY OF THE FORMER IRAQI RE- GIME, ITS SENIOR OFFICIALS AND THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS, AND TAKING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS COMMUNICATION FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING NOTIFICATION TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF THE NATIONAL EMER- GENCY DECLARED IN EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 13303 OF MAY 22, 2003, WITH RESPECT TO THE BLOCKING OF PROPERTY OF THE FORMER IRAQI REGIME, ITS SENIOR OFFICIALS AND THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS, AND TAKING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1703(b) AND 50 U.S.C. 1631 SEPTEMBER 3, 2003.—Referred to the Committee on International Relations and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 19–011 WASHINGTON : 2003 VerDate jul 14 2003 06:52 Sep 06, 2003 Jkt 019011 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HD122.XXX HD122 E:\Seals\Congress.#13 VerDate jul 14 2003 06:52 Sep 06, 2003 Jkt 019011 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HD122.XXX HD122 THE WHITE HOUSE, Washington, August 28, 2003. Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Washington, DC. DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Consistent with section 204(b) of the Inter- national Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), 50 U.S.C. 1703(b), and section 301 of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1631, I hereby report that I have exercised my authority to expand the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, to address the unusual and extraor- dinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in that country, and the development of political, administrative, and eco- nomic institutions, in Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a the Ali Hassan Al-Majid Tapes the Following Are Selected Remarks by Ali Hassan Al-Majid, Secretary General of The
    Appendix A The Ali Hassan Al-Majid Tapes The following are selected remarks by Ali Hassan al-Majid, Secretary General of the Ba'ath Party's Northern Bureau, from a number of meetings with senior Ba'ath officials in 1988 and 1989. Audiotapes of more than a dozen of these meetings were recovered from Iraqi government offices and from al-Majid's home in Kirkuk during the failed Kurdish uprising in March 1991. 1. Meeting with members of the Northern Bureau and governors of the Autonomous Region of Iraqi Kurdistan, April 15, 1988. By next summer there will be no more villages remaining spread out here and there, but only complexes. It'll be just like the hen when she puts the chicks under her wing. We'll put the people in the complexes and keep an eye on them. We'll no longer let them live in the villages where the saboteurs can go and visit them. Emigration from the villages to the city is necessary in the north of Iraq. From now on I won't give the villagers flour, sugar, kerosene, water or electricity as long as they continue living there. Let them come closer to me to hear me, so that I can tell them the things I believe and want in ideology, education and common sense. Why should I let them live there like donkeys who don't know anything? For the wheat? I don't want their wheat. We've been importing wheat for the last twenty years. Let's increase it for another five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Into Iraq
    Chaillot Paper July 2005 n°79 Looking into Iraq Martin van Bruinessen, Jean-François Daguzan, Andrzej Kapiszewski, Walter Posch and Álvaro de Vasconcelos Edited by Walter Posch cc79-cover.qxp 28/07/2005 15:27 Page 2 Chaillot Paper Chaillot n° 79 In January 2002 the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) beca- Looking into Iraq me an autonomous Paris-based agency of the European Union. Following an EU Council Joint Action of 20 July 2001, it is now an integral part of the new structures that will support the further development of the CFSP/ESDP. The Institute’s core mission is to provide analyses and recommendations that can be of use and relevance to the formulation of the European security and defence policy. In carrying out that mission, it also acts as an interface between European experts and decision-makers at all levels. Chaillot Papers are monographs on topical questions written either by a member of the ISS research team or by outside authors chosen and commissioned by the Institute. Early drafts are normally discussed at a semi- nar or study group of experts convened by the Institute and publication indicates that the paper is considered Edited by Walter Posch Edited by Walter by the ISS as a useful and authoritative contribution to the debate on CFSP/ESDP. Responsibility for the views expressed in them lies exclusively with authors. Chaillot Papers are also accessible via the Institute’s Website: www.iss-eu.org cc79-Text.qxp 28/07/2005 15:36 Page 1 Chaillot Paper July 2005 n°79 Looking into Iraq Martin van Bruinessen, Jean-François Daguzan, Andrzej Kapiszewski, Walter Posch and Álvaro de Vasconcelos Edited by Walter Posch Institute for Security Studies European Union Paris cc79-Text.qxp 28/07/2005 15:36 Page 2 Institute for Security Studies European Union 43 avenue du Président Wilson 75775 Paris cedex 16 tel.: +33 (0)1 56 89 19 30 fax: +33 (0)1 56 89 19 31 e-mail: [email protected] www.iss-eu.org Director: Nicole Gnesotto © EU Institute for Security Studies 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • FRATERNITIES Carstens
    m _ edseodestt whe sepas the letter @t Maysee flaith Bad pinsw0 *ie aft Us enm tsee UP&U bwad wima-&imips1 ed t 000ta by er ber at whnne *ate fad both,"1110r110119"M mudt without. do usht net bb h h la W Wesatm112,0am has e the "am ofterams esm- * 'Dd him come W she said, and then been Ons in 4 bte" a fee-Illmmme a 4bvn--ai Mgea Sone of the maids of he the at thimrtu ofs0 ase a t be 1T. "evhgo de isn- temporary bath led a m dU- wh See waS esat to each m 1er et the esb- went to gli the mesenger Into the lsser who ghter-h&* 'a wwa hs' blood. wof I usaw m of the two tents of festval she added. bath made o she is ToU-q0-- a , bm his- **m7~TheIlulmef aemin cemnib- "And where Is-the'ma r you." Ie a towar the MareemA, BathM 944Wo baentehodAM LaVIARSIXh et PyM,aw atdtismA ~mmn-y. Adigagoswh.gnot tuigase with a, It was Yvette who answered ber. who stood u whSS anTraR TheI to a 100110 s-m 4101 yeaw ag& Some n"4aa 'Do not hear?' she erled, clapping at-the anddea fduf&panm. Vri mosame be itramarred M' aamhabemPto 8m-I he of a you wRi the harbt t t" eamtr Maes, No. of ts and Is her hands with pleasurw "His people are boy, slay YoeIldn 2, Hity, wt He bringing him up In triumph. Do you hear And at the wonhe preciptated Mise rec"neftd as me at the most sette aGd leg.
    [Show full text]
  • Irregular Warfare: a Case Study in Cia and Us Army Special Forces Operations in Northern Iraq, 2002-03
    IRREGULAR WARFARE: A CASE STUDY IN CIA AND US ARMY SPECIAL FORCES OPERATIONS IN NORTHERN IRAQ, 2002-03 THE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE ANDREW L., MICK MULROY, AND KEN TOVO AUGUST 2021 WWW.MEI.EDU ABOUT THE MIDDLE EAST INSTITUTE The Middle East Institute is a center of knowledge dedicated to narrowing divides between the peoples of the Middle East and the United States. With over 70 years’ experience, MEI has established itself as a credible, non-partisan source of insight and policy analysis on all matters concerning the Middle East. MEI is distinguished by its holistic approach to the region and its deep understanding of the Middle East’s political, economic and cultural contexts. Through the collaborative work of its three centers — Policy & Research, Arts & Culture, and Education — MEI provides current and future leaders with the resources necessary to build a future of mutual understanding. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Andrew L. “Uncle Andy” is a retired Senior Intelligence Service Paramilitary Operations Officer in the Special Activities Center with 25 years of service in the CIA. He is a former U.S. Marine infantry and reconnaissance officer. Michael “Mick” Patrick Mulroy Mick Mulroy is the former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East. He is also a retired CIA Paramilitary Operations Officer in the Special Activities Center and a United States Marine. He is a Senior Fellow for the Middle East Institute, an ABC News National Security Analyst, and a co-founder of Lobo Institute. Kenneth “Ken” Tovo Lieutenant General (Ret.) Ken Tovo retired from the U.S. Army in 2018 with 35 years of service.
    [Show full text]
  • GREGORY the Natures of War FINAL May 2015
    !1 The Natures of War Derek Gregory for Neil 1 In his too short life, Neil Smith had much to say about both nature and war: from his seminal discussion of ‘the production of nature’ in his first book, Uneven development, to his dissections of war in the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries in American Empire – where he identified the ends of the First and Second World Wars as crucial punctuations in the modern genealogy of globalisation – and its coda, The endgame of globalization, a critique of America’s wars conducted in the shadows of 9/11. 2 And yet, surprisingly, he never linked the two. He was of course aware of their connections. He always insisted that the capitalist production of nature, like that of space, was never – could not be – a purely domestic matter, and he emphasised that the modern projects of colonialism and imperialism depended upon often spectacular displays of military violence. But he did not explore those relations in any systematic or substantive fashion. He was not alone. The great Marxist critic Raymond Williams once famously identified ‘nature’ as ‘perhaps the most complex word in the [English] language.’ Since he wrote, countless commentators have elaborated on its complexities, but few of them 1 This is a revised and extended version of the first Neil Smith Lecture, delivered at the University of St Andrews – Neil’s alma mater – on 14 November 2013. I am grateful to Catriona Gold for research assistance on the Western Desert, to Paige Patchin for lively discussions about porno-tropicality and the Vietnam war, and to Noel Castree, Dan Clayton, Deb Cowen, Isla Forsyth, Gastón Gordillo, Jaimie Gregory, Craig Jones, Stephen Legg and the editorial collective of Antipode for radically improving my early drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Past Failures, Present Solutions
    Saint Louis University Law Journal Volume 50 Number 2 A Tribute to the Honorable Michael A. Article 16 Wolff (Winter 2006) 2006 The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Past Failures, Present Solutions Morse Tan The University of Texas at Austin School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Morse Tan, The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Past Failures, Present Solutions, 50 St. Louis U. L.J. (2006). Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol50/iss2/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW THE NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR CRISIS: PAST FAILURES, PRESENT SOLUTIONS MORSE TAN* ABSTRACT North Korea has recently announced that it has developed nuclear weapons and has pulled out of the six-party talks. These events do not emerge out of a vacuum, and this Article lends perspective through an interdisciplinary lens that seeks to grapple with the complexities and provide constructive approaches based on this well-researched understanding. This Article analyzes political, military, historical, legal and other angles of this international crisis. Past dealings with North Korea have been unfruitful because other nations do not recognize the ties between North Korean acts and its ideology and objectives. For a satisfactory resolution to the current crisis, South Korea and the United States must maintain sufficient deterrence, focus on multi-lateral and international avenues, and increase the negative and later positive incentives for North Korean compliance with its international obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance
    Order Code RL31339 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance Updated May 16, 2005 Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Iraq: U.S. Regime Change Efforts and Post-Saddam Governance Summary Operation Iraqi Freedom accomplished a long-standing U.S. objective, the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, but replacing his regime with a stable, moderate, democratic political structure has been complicated by a persistent Sunni Arab-led insurgency. The Bush Administration asserts that establishing democracy in Iraq will catalyze the promotion of democracy throughout the Middle East. The desired outcome would also likely prevent Iraq from becoming a sanctuary for terrorists, a key recommendation of the 9/11 Commission report. The Bush Administration asserts that U.S. policy in Iraq is now showing substantial success, demonstrated by January 30, 2005 elections that chose a National Assembly, and progress in building Iraq’s various security forces. The Administration says it expects that the current transition roadmap — including votes on a permanent constitution by October 31, 2005 and for a permanent government by December 15, 2005 — are being implemented. Others believe the insurgency is widespread, as shown by its recent attacks, and that the Iraqi government could not stand on its own were U.S. and allied international forces to withdraw from Iraq. Some U.S. commanders and senior intelligence officials say that some Islamic militants have entered Iraq since Saddam Hussein fell, to fight what they see as a new “jihad” (Islamic war) against the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • FM 3-24.2. Tactics in Counterinsurgency
    FM 3-24.2 (FM 90-8, FM 7-98) TACTICS IN COUNTERINSURGENCY APRIL 2009 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil) and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at (www.train.army.mil). * FM 3-24.2 (FM 90-8, FM 7-98) Field Manual Headquarters Department of the Army No. 3-24.2 Washington, DC, 21 April 2009 Tactics in Counterinsurgency Contents Page PREFACE ................................................................................................................. viii INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... ix Chapter 1 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF COUNTERINSURGENCY ........................... 1-1 Section I—OVERVIEW ............................................................................................. 1-1 Insurgency........................................................................................................... 1-1 Counterinsurgency .............................................................................................. 1-2 Influences on Current Operational Environments ............................................... 1-2 Section II—OPERATIONAL AND MISSION VARIABLES ..................................... 1-3 Operational Variables ......................................................................................... 1-3 Mission Variables ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]