Obelisk Unique

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Obelisk Unique Originally built by Thutmose IV - 1401 BCE to 1391 BCE Other works initiated by Thutmose IV: Thutmose IV Peristyle Hall, Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II Other obelisks: Obelisks at Contra Temple, Obelisks at Eastern Gate, Obelisks of Festival Hall Center Pair, Obelisks of Festival Hall East Pair, Obelisks of Festival Hall West Pair, Obelisks of 7th Pylon, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall Introduction The unique obelisk, also known as the “Lateran obelisk,” was the largest obelisk ever raised at Karnak. It stood east of the core Amun-Ra temple, in an area of Karnak focused on the worship of solar gods. Photograph of Obelisk Unique in its existing state. The obelisk remained at Karnak until CE 330, when the Roman emperor Constantine ordered it brought to the city of Constantinople. However, engineers could not manage to move the obelisk out of the port of Alexandria. It was not until CE 356 that the obelisk was moved to Rome and erected at the Circus Maximus. Later it was toppled and broke into three pieces. It was re- erected in the 16th century where it stands now in the Piazza san Giovanni in Laterano, Rome. Measurements: The obelisk measures 33.1m in height, the tallest ever to stand at Karnak. Phase: Thutmose IV Thutmose III commissioned the unique obelisk, but the king died before the monolith was erected at Karnak. His grandson, Thutmose IV, raised the obelisk, intending for it to stand as a single monument, rather than in a pair. Thutmose IV added two lines of vertical inscriptions flanking those of his grandfather on each face. Construction materials: rose granite Rendering of Obelisk Unique. Obelisk Unique About the reconstruction model of this phase The model reconstruction was based on the known height of the obelisk and photographs of the monument today. The four sides of the obelisk of the “Lateran” obelisk were photographed in Rome and placed on the model. They were placed according to the directional indications given by Bell (2002: 24 and note 48). Bibliography and Sources Used for Model Construction Rendering of Obelisk Unique. Bell, Lanny (2002), “Divine kingship and the theology of the obelisk cult in the temples of Thebes,” in Ägyptologische Tempeltagung : Würzburg, 23.-26. September 1999, vol. 5. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 17-46. Dondelinger, Edmund (1977), Der Obelisk : ein Steinmal ägyptischer Weltanschauung. Graz: Akadem. Druck- u. Verlagsanst. Further reading Marucchi, Orazio (1898), Gli obelischi egiziani di Roma. Rome: E. Loescher & Co. © 2008 All rights reserved. Sullivan 2008, Obelisk Unique. Digital Karnak. 2 Regents of the University of California..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

YERBILIMLERI Bulletin for Earth Sciences
YERBILIMLERI Bulletin for Earth Sciences ISSN: 2687 - 2978 Yerbilimleri, 2020, 41 (2), 169-182, DOI:10.17824/yerbilimleri.630560 Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yerbilimleri Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Bülteni Bulletin of the Earth Sciences Application and Research Centre of Hacettepe University Structural evaluation for the preservation of an ancient Egyptian Obelisk in Istanbul, Turkey Istanbul’da eski bir Mısır dikilitaşının koruma amaçlı yapısal değerlendirilmesi GÜLTEN POLAT *1, ÖZDEN SAYGILI 1 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey Geliş (received): 4 Ekim (October) 2019 Kabul (accepted) : 10 Ağustos (August) 2020 ABSTRACT The "Obelisk of Theodosius" is one of the most important monuments located in the former Hippodrome in Istanbul, Turkey. The Obelisk with its sculpted base is 24.77 meters in height today, but historical recordings indicate that it was evidently higher originally. Additionally, the recordings show that some of the parts were left behind in Egypt due to transportation. The Obelisk has been exposed to many natural devastating events, particularly strong earthquakes. The monument is in a seismically very active region, Istanbul, located near one of the most devastating active faults of Turkey, the North Anatolian Fault. For the preservation of this obelisk, it is important to evaluate its seismic performance. For this purpose, in this study, the structural dynamic characteristics and the response of the obelisk were investigated. To achieve this aim, a numerical model was created using a finite element approach. In addition to this, real ground motion data were analyzed in this study. The most important finding of the study is that although the obelisk had experienced devastating earthquakes for a long time, revealed deformation is not noticeable.
[Show full text]
Pagan-City-And-Christian-Capital-Rome-In-The-Fourth-Century-2000.Pdf
OXFORDCLASSICALMONOGRAPHS Published under the supervision of a Committee of the Faculty of Literae Humaniores in the University of Oxford The aim of the Oxford Classical Monographs series (which replaces the Oxford Classical and Philosophical Monographs) is to publish books based on the best theses on Greek and Latin literature, ancient history, and ancient philosophy examined by the Faculty Board of Literae Humaniores. Pagan City and Christian Capital Rome in the Fourth Century JOHNR.CURRAN CLARENDON PRESS ´ OXFORD 2000 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's aim of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok BogotaÂ Bombay Buenos Aires Calcutta Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris SaÄo Paulo Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw with associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York # John Curran 2000 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2000 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organizations. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same conditions on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data applied for Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Curran, John R.
[Show full text]
Catch a Falling Obelisk
Catch a Falling Obelisk Mark Barahman, Dan Feldman, Jeremy Lyons, & Michelle Plastrik MHC 3: Science and Technology of New York City, Fall 2009 Professor: Sophia Perdikaris Technical Advisor: Gregory Donovan Abstract The future of the ancient world is at a crossroads, for polluon and climate threaten the preservaon of anquies. This global problem can be found in our own backyard, New York City, where the Egypan obelisk is slowly deteriorang, as is its twin in London. Our project sheds light on the dangers facing monumental works of art and the technology being used to stop the ravages of me and polluon. To compare the condions of the obelisks, and invesgate corrosion mechanisms of granite, we studied atmospheric composion in terms of air‐borne molecules and chemicals, data about weather and precipitaon, and the impact of organisms on exposed granite. We invesgated past and present preservaon methods, and evaluated what must be done in the future to best maintain the obelisks. We idenfied which preservaon techniques are most effecve in protecng the obelisks, and determined the efficiency of these methods. London Obelisk A Brief History (6) •The New York and London Egypan obelisks, known popularly as Cleopatra’s Needles, are twins (2) New York Obelisk •Both were created in the Egypan city Heliopolis around 1500 BCE and later stood in Alexandria (2) (5) •In 1801 the Egypan government presented one of these obelisks to the Brish (9) •It was finally erected in London in 1878, aer a hazardous journey by sea (2) •Later in the 19th century Egypt gave
[Show full text]
Investigating the Revival of Ancient Egyptian Artifacts As a Symbol of Power Through Their Occupation of European Public Spaces: a Chrono-Morphological Study
Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies - Volume 7, Issue 3, July 2021 – Pages 187-200 Investigating the Revival of Ancient Egyptian Artifacts as a Symbol of Power through their Occupation of European Public Spaces: A Chrono-Morphological Study By Mohamed Raslan*, István Bartók± & Zoltán Szécsi Numerous architectural styles have been explored in recent years (Pakkanen 2018). However, Egyptian revival did not obtain the consideration it deserved till lately, when there was a remarkable flow of attention coursed by various significant ancient Egyptian exhibitions all over the world, which led to the publications of books and articles tackling the Egyptian revival (Curl 2013). In this paper the researcher will try to investigate the chronological change of form and shape of ancient Egyptian architectural features that were revived in European public spaces to signify power, sovereignty, and authority. Curl (2013) charts the argument of the persistence of Egyptian motifs in design from Greco- Roman Antiquity, through the Mediaeval, Baroque, and Neo-Classical periods. Our hypothesis is that Ancient Egypt is a central source, rather than peripheral, to the development of considerable volume of European urbanistic and architectural features. We will distinguish manifestations with Egyptian connotations based on literature reviewed, field observation and the methodology of Curl (2013). Aiming only on three ancient Egyptian sources, the Sphinx, the obelisk, and the temple. Keywords: Egyptian revival, Ancient Egyptian artifacts, morphological regeneration, space occupation, public spaces Introduction The civilization of the West that progressed from the Greco-Roman realm, later from the intricate organization of the Christian Church and its direct connections with secular power and the legitimizing of that power, depicted profoundly on the religion of Ancient Egypt and the authority given to religion people of the Pharaoh, a statement that is often overlooked, or proclaimed as ‘extravagant’ by reviewers (Curl 2013).
[Show full text]
Obelisks at 7Th Pylon
Obelisks at 7th Pylon Originally built by Thutmose III - 1479 BCE to 1425 BCE Other works initiated by Thutmose III: Akhmenu, Contra Temple, Wadjet Hall, 7th Pylon, Thutmose III Shrine, Enclosures and Gates, Sacred Lake, 6th Pylon and Court, 5th Pylon and Court, Station of the King and Corridor, Obelisks of Festival Hall Center Pair, Central Bark Shrine, Palace of Ma’at, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall, Pylon and Festival Court of Thutmose II, East Exterior Wall Other obelisks: Obelisk Unique, Obelisks at Contra Temple, Obelisks at Eastern Gate, Obelisks of Festival Hall Center Pair, Obelisks of Festival Hall East Pair, Obelisks of Festival Hall West Pair, Obelisks of Wadjet Hall Introduction These obelisks originally stood to the south of pylon 7. The western obelisk was removed by a Roman emperor (possibly Constantius) in the 4th century CE and eventually sent to Constantinople, the capital of the Roman Empire in the east, present day Istanbul, Turkey. It now adorns the Hippodrome. The tip of the second obelisk was recovered at Karnak. Measurements: The obelisk in Istanbul measures 20m, but only its upper portion survives. It would have originally stood almost 29m, not including a base of more than 1m. Phase: Thutmose III Thutmose III erected these obelisks in front of his new pylon entrance along the temple’s north/south processional route (the seventh pylon). Interestingly, while only the upper portion of this obelisk survives, its inscription is very similar to an obelisk depicted in a relief scene of Thutmose III. Its full size and text has been hypothesized based on this image.
[Show full text]
Interpretation of the Function of the Obelisk of Augustus in Rome from Antique Texts to Present Time Virtual Reconstruction
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-2/W11, 2019 GEORES 2019 – 2nd International Conference of Geomatics and Restoration, 8–10 May 2019, Milan, Italy INTERPRETATION OF THE FUNCTION OF THE OBELISK OF AUGUSTUS IN ROME FROM ANTIQUE TEXTS TO PRESENT TIME VIRTUAL RECONSTRUCTION M. Hiermanseder Hietzing Consult, Vienna, Austria - [email protected] KEY WORDS: Astronomy, Line of Meridian, Historical Texts, Archeology, Simulation, Virtual World Heritage ABSTRACT: About the astronomical use of the obelisk of Augustus on Campo Marzio in Rome, which has already been described by Pliny, well known astronomers and mathematicians like Euler, Marinoni or Poleni have given their expert opinion immediately after it's unearthing in 1748. With the prevailing opinion, based on a brief chapter in "Historia naturalis", it would constitute a line of meridian rather than a sundial, the question had been decided for more than 200 years. In 1976, however, the prominent German archeologist Edmund Buchner established once more the assumption, that the obelisk has been part of a gigantic sundial for the apotheosis of the emperor Augustus. Excavations of the German Archeological Institute in 1980/81, which brought to light parts of the inscriptions of the scale, were taken as a proof of his theory by Buchner. Since 1990 works by physicists and experts for chronometry like Schütz, Maes, Auber, et.al., established the interpretation as a line of meridian. Recent measurements and virtual reconstructions of the antique situation in 2013 provide valid evidence for this argument as well. The different approach to the problem mirrors the antagonism between interpretation of antique texts and the assessment of archeological findings in the light of far fledged historical hypotheses.
[Show full text]
Lateran Obelisk, Rome
LATERAN OBELISK, http://prev.enea.it ROME In collaboration with: Archaeological Superintendence of Rome, Superintendence of Monuments of Rome, SEA (Società Europont Appalti), ENEA MAT, coord. Prof. M. Diana Years: 2007 - 2008 The Obelisk was built in 15th centu- ry B.C. and brought by Constantius II to Rome in 357 A.D. It was lost and found again in 1587 and on August 3rd, 1588, according to the project of the architect Domenico Fontana, the Obelisk was raised in San Giovanni in Laterano, strategi- cally one of the most important ar- eas in Rome. Measurements of ambient and traf- fic-induced vibrations on the Obe- lisk were carried out, as part of a general study for preservation ef- forts. The recordings were obtained by the installation of velocimetric sensors on the structure, in differ- ent configurations. Data obtained were analyzed in time and frequency do- main, providing the first structural resonances and the corresponding mode shapes of the Obelisk. The experimental results were also compared with those obtained numerically by means of a finite element model. Mode 2 WE Mode 3 NS Mode 4 WE f = 1.27 Hz f = 6.73 Hz f = 6.15 Hz Noise measurements were also carried References out by arranging the sensors to the Buffarini G., Clemente P., Paciello ground at various hours of the day. No A., Rinaldis D. (2008). “Vibra- amplification of motion due to site ef- tion Analysis of the Lateran Obelisk”. Proc., 14th WCEE, Pa- fects was detected but the dynamic re- per S11-055, IAEE & CAEE, Mira sponse at the site was influenced by the Digital Publ., Saint Louis.
[Show full text]
Obelisk Article.3-4
NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions By Ned Hémard The Obelisk with the Odd Inscription Obelisks are tall, four-sided tapering monuments which are crowned by a pyramid-like shape at their peaks. These Egyptian monoliths became popular during the Enlightenment and connected with the mortuary arts as symbols of timelessness and memorialization. When it comes to obelisks, Americans immediately think of the Washington Monument in Washington, D. C. New Orleanians recall the Egyptian obelisk known as the Chalmette Monument (in Chalmette, Louisiana) rising 100 feet 2 ½ inches above the ground upon which the Battle of New Orleans was fought in 1815. Then there are cenotaphs. They look like tombs but are actually monuments erected in honor of a person (or persons) whose remains lie elsewhere. The word comes from the Greek kenos, one meaning being “empty”, and taphos for “tomb”. Oftentimes this is the result of their bodies not being found. Such was the case with architect James Gallier, Sr., and his wife. In St. Louis Cemetery #3, one can find an impressive cenotaph erected by James Gallier, Jr., to the memory of his father and stepmother who both perished when the “Evening Star” was sunk during a hurricane off the coast of Georgia on the morning of October 3, 1866. Because of its past history as a racecourse, Eberhard Deutsch has written of Metairie Cemetery’s “sardonic characterization as a haven for the quick and the dead”. It is also the New Orleans location for a monument that is both an obelisk and a cenotaph, with a most unusual inscription.
[Show full text]
Astronomy, Topography and Dynastic History in the Age of the Pyramids
Astronomy, topography and dynastic history in the Age of the Pyramids. Giulio Magli Faculty of Civil Architecture - Politecnico di Milano Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy It is known since the 19 century that in the layout of the pyramid field of the pharaohs of the 4 th Egyptian dynasty at Giza, a “main axis” exists. Indeed, the south-east corners of these monuments align towards the site of the temple of Heliopolis, which was plainly visible in ancient times. It was later discovered that a similar situation occurs in the main pyramid field of the subsequent dynasty at Abu Sir. Here, the north-west corners of three chronologically successive pyramids again voluntarily align towards Heliopolis. However, the temple was in this case not visible, due to the rock outcrop- today occupied by the Cairo citadel - which blocks the view. In the present paper, a multi-disciplinary approach based on historical, topographical and archaeoastronomical analysis is developed in an attempt at understanding this peculiar feature, which governed from the very beginning the planning of such wonderful monuments. A general pattern actually arises, which appears to have inspired the choice of the sites and the disposition on the ground of almost all the funerary complexes of the kings during the Old Kingdom. 1. Introduction An interesting feature exists in the layouts of the pyramids of Giza and Abu Sir: the presence of a “main axis” directed to the area where the ancient temple of the sun of Heliopolis once stood, on the opposite bank of the Nile. These axes are connected with a process of “solarisation” of the pharaoh which probably started with Khufu, the builder of the Great Pyramid.
[Show full text]
The Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III
The Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III DESCRIPTION Akkadian Language: (Neo-Assyrian) Medium: black limestone 4 panels Size: 2.02 meters high Text length: 190 lines + 5 captions Approximate Date of Obelisk: 827 BCE Approximate Date of Jehu's Tribute: 841 BCE Dates of Shalmaneser III's reign: 858–824 BCE Date of Discovery: 1846 ancient Kalhu/Calah Place of Discovery: (modern Nimrud, Iraq) Excavator: Austen Henry Layard (1817-1894) Current Location: British Museum BM WAA 118885 Inventory Number: (BM = British Museum; WAA = Western Asiastic Antiquities) TRANSLATION (Adapted from Luckenbill 1926:200-211) (1-21) Assur, the great lord, king of all the great gods; Anu, king of the Igigi and Anunnaki, the lord of lands; Enlil, the exalted, father of the gods, the creator; Ea, king of the Deep, who determines destiny; Sin, king of the tiara, exalted in splendor; Adad, mighty, pre-eminent, lord of abundance; Shamash, judge of heaven and earth, director of all; Marduk, master of the gods, lord of law; Urta, valiant one of the Igigi and the Anunnaki, the almighty god; Nergal, the ready, king of battle; Nusku, bearer of the shining scepter, the god who renders decisions; Ninlil, spouse of Bêl, mother of the great gods; Ishtar, lady of conflict and battle, whose delight is warfare, great gods, who love my kingship, who have made great my rule, power, and sway, who have established for me an honored, an exalted name, far above that of all other lords! Shalmaneser, king of all peoples, lord, priest of Assur, mighty king, king of all the four regions, Sun of all peoples, despot of all lands; son of Assur-nâsir-pal, the high priest, whose priesthood was acceptable to the gods and who brought in submission at his feet the totality of the countries; glorious offspring of Tukulti-Urta, who slew all of his foes and overwhelmed them like a deluge.
[Show full text]
Rome Architecture Guide 2020
WHAT Architect WHERE Notes Zone 1: Ancient Rome The Flavium Amphitheatre was built in 80 AD of concrete and stone as the largest amphitheatre in the world. The Colosseum could hold, it is estimated, between 50,000 and 80,000 spectators, and was used The Colosseum or for gladiatorial contests and public spectacles such as mock sea Amphitheatrum ***** Unknown Piazza del Colosseo battles, animal hunts, executions, re-enactments of famous battles, Flavium and dramas based on Classical mythology. General Admission €14, Students €7,5 (includes Colosseum, Foro Romano + Palatino). Hypogeum can be visited with previous reservation (+8€). Mon-Sun (8.30am-1h before sunset) On the western side of the Colosseum, this monumental triple arch was built in AD 315 to celebrate the emperor Constantine's victory over his rival Maxentius at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge (AD 312). Rising to a height of 25m, it's the largest of Rome's surviving ***** Arch of Constantine Unknown Piazza del Colosseo triumphal arches. Above the archways is placed the attic, composed of brickwork revetted (faced) with marble. A staircase within the arch is entered from a door at some height from the ground, on the west side, facing the Palatine Hill. The arch served as the finish line for the marathon athletic event for the 1960 Summer Olympics. The Domus Aurea was a vast landscaped palace built by the Emperor Nero in the heart of ancient Rome after the great fire in 64 AD had destroyed a large part of the city and the aristocratic villas on the Palatine Hill.
[Show full text]
The Temple of Heliopolis: Excavations 2012-14 Heliopolis Once Stood at the Centre of the Ancient Egyptian Sun-Cult
EGYPTIAN ARCHAEOLOGY The temple of Heliopolis: excavations 2012-14 Heliopolis once stood at the centre of the ancient Egyptian sun-cult. Its architectural layout and landscape are the topic of debate, much of it based on decontextualized objects. Today, the temple area is threatened by modern garbage dumps and other usage. Aiman Ashmawy and Dietrich Raue report on the recent Egyptian-German excavations there. The sun-cult was the core Area of the central temple of Heliopolis (Misraa es-Segun) with the Matariya Museum and the obelisk of Sesostris I. element of ancient Egyptian Photograph: Dietrich Raue. religion for more than three millennia, and Heliopolis stood at its centre: The place of the world’s creation and a national reference point. In ancient Egypt, like in modern Egyptology, Heliopolis was considered to be the model for large temple complexes, such as Karnak and the Great Aten temple of Amarna. The architectural layout and the landscape of Heliopolis are the topic of much debate. Most of the hypotheses about this centre of the sun-cult are based on decontextualized objects like obelisks in London, New York, Rome, and other places, as well as on the still standing obelisk of Sesostris I, in Matariya. The temple area is threatened by modern garbage dumps, function of this structure is disputed, as is its date and its in the area called Misraa el-Segun, and by other usage architectural context. Excavation work, combined with including house construction, especially in the area of geomorphological and geophysical investigations (see the the shopping mall Suq el-Khamis.
[Show full text]