DOCSLIB.ORG

Positron Processes in the Sun

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Positron Processes in the Sun atoms Review Positron Processes in the Sun Nat Gopalswamy Solar Physics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; [email protected] Received: 19 March 2020; Accepted: 16 April 2020; Published: 22 April 2020 Abstract: Positrons play a major role in the emission of solar gamma-rays at energies from a few hundred keV to >1 GeV.Although the processes leading to positron production in the solar atmosphere are well known, the origin of the underlying energetic particles that interact with the ambient particles is poorly understood. With the aim of understanding the full gamma-ray spectrum of the Sun, I review the key emission mechanisms that contribute to the observed gamma-ray spectrum, focusing on the ones involving positrons. In particular, I review the processes involved in the 0.511 MeV positron annihilation line and the positronium continuum emissions at low energies, and the pion continuum emission at high energies in solar eruptions. It is thought that particles accelerated at the flare reconnection and at the shock driven by coronal mass ejections are responsible for the observed gamma-ray features. Based on some recent developments I suggest that energetic particles from both mechanisms may contribute to the observed gamma-ray spectrum in the impulsive phase, while the shock mechanism is responsible for the extended phase. Keywords: solar flares; coronal mass ejections; shocks; positrons; positronium; positron annihilation; pion decay 1. Introduction Positrons, the antiparticle of electrons, were proposed theoretically by Dirac and were first detected by Anderson in 1933 [1]. Positrons are extensively used in the laboratory for a myriad of purposes (see review by Mills [2]). Astrophysical processes involving positrons have been found in the interstellar medium [3], and galactic bulge and disk [4]. Positrons are commonly found in the Sun [5]. The proton–proton chain, which accounts for most of the energy release inside the Sun involves the emission of a positron when two protons collide to form a deuterium nucleus. There are plenty of electrons present in the solar core, so the positrons are immediately annihilated with electrons and produce two gamma-ray photons. In one proton–proton chain, two positrons are emitted and hence contribute a total of four photons in addition to the two photons emitted during the formation of a helium-3 (3He) nucleus from the fusion of deuterium nucleus with a proton. High-energy particles exist in the solar atmosphere, energized during solar eruptions. Solar eruptions involve flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). A process known as magnetic reconnection taking place in the solar corona is thought to be the process which converts energy stored in the stressed solar magnetic fields into solar eruptions (see Figure1 for a schematic of a typical eruption). One part of the released energy heats the plasma in the eruption region, while another goes to energize electrons and ions. Electromagnetic radiation from radio waves to gamma-rays produced by the energized electrons and protons by various processes is known as a flare. Acceleration in the reconnection region is referred to as flare acceleration or stochastic acceleration. CMEs also carry the released energy as the kinetic energy of the expelled magnetized plasma with a mass as high as 1016 g and speeds exceeding 3000 km/s. Such fast CMEs drive fast-mode magnetohydrodynamic shocks that can also energize ambient electrons and ions to very high energies. Diffusive shock Atoms 2020, 8, 14; doi:10.3390/atoms8020014 www.mdpi.com/journal/atoms Atoms 2020, 8, 14 2 of 12 acceleration and shock drift acceleration are the mechanisms by which particles are energized at the shock (see [7] for a review on acceleration mechanisms during solar eruptions). The flare and shock accelerations were referred to as first- and second-phase accelerations during an eruption by Wild et al. [8]. Accelerated particles have access to open and closed magnetic structures associated with the eruption resulting in a number of electromagnetic emissions via different emission mechanisms. Energetic particles escaping along interplanetary magnetic field lines are detected as solar energetic particle (SEP)Atoms 2019 events, 7, x FOR by PEER particle REVIEW detectors in space and on ground. These particles, originally2 of known 12 as solar cosmic rays, were first detected by Forbush [9] in the 1940s. 33 34 Figure 1.FigureSchematic 1. Schematic of a solar of a solar eruption eruption and and the the sites sites of of particleparticle acceleration acceleration (e,p, (e,p, …):::: one): in one the current in the current 35 sheet formedsheet formed low in low the in corona the corona and and the the other other on on thethe surface of of the the shock shock driven driven by the by coronal the coronal mass mass 36 ejectionejection (CME) (CME) flux rope. flux rope. The The arrows arrows toward toward the the currentcurrent sheet sheet indicate indicate the thereconnection reconnection inflow inflow while while 37 the onesthe diverging ones diverging away away indicate indicate the the outflow. outflow. The The redred ellipses in inthe the photosphere photosphere represent represent the feet the feet 38 of flare loops where accelerated particles precipitate and produce flare radiation. Particles from the of flare loops where accelerated particles precipitate and produce flare radiation. Particles from the 39 shock propagate away from the Sun and are detected as energetic particle events in space. The dark shock propagate away from the Sun and are detected as energetic particle events in space. The dark 40 ellipse inside the flux rope represents a prominence that erupted along with the CME (adapted from 41 ellipse insideGopalswamy the flux [6]). rope represents a prominence that erupted along with the CME (adapted from Gopalswamy [6]). 42 High-energy particles exist in the solar atmosphere, energized during solar eruptions. Solar 43 Invokingeruptions the involve copious flares production and coronal of energetic mass ejections particles (CMEs). from the A Sun,process Morrison known [as10 ]magnetic suggested that the44 active reconnection Sun must taking be a source place in of the gamma-rays. solar corona Heis thought listed electron-positronto be the process which annihilation converts energy as one of the processes45 stored expected in the stressed to produce solar gamma-raymagnetic fields emission into solar from eruption cosmics (see sources Figure 1 [ 10for]. a Elliot schematic [11] of suggested a 46 that “positivetypical electrons”eruption). One from part muon of the decay released should energy lead heats to detectable the plasma 0.5in MeVthe eruptio gamma-rayn region, line while emission. 47 another goes to energize electrons and ions. Electromagnetic radiation from radio waves to gamma- Lingenfelter and Ramaty [12] performed detailed calculations of gamma-ray emission processes from 48 rays produced by the energized electrons and protons by various processes is known as a flare. the49 Sun. Acceleration Chupp et al.in the [13 reconnection] identified region for the is firstreferred time to as the flare positron acceleration annihilation or stochastic radiation acceleration. at 0.5 MeV along50 withCMEs other also nuclearcarry the linesreleased during energy the as intensethe kinetic solar energy flares of the of expelled 1972 August magnetized 4 and plasma 7 using with data a from the51 Gamma-ray mass as Monitorhigh as 10 onboard16 g and NASA’s speeds exceeding Seventh Orbiting3000 km/s. Solar Such Observatory fast CMEs (OSO-7)drive fast mission.-mode 52 magnetohydrodynamic shocks that can also energize ambient electrons and ions to very high 2.53 Mechanisms energies. ofDiffusive Positron shock Production acceleration and shock drift acceleration are the mechanisms by which 54 particles are energized at the shock (see [7] for a review on acceleration mechanisms during solar 55 Positronseruptions). are The predominantly flare and shock producedaccelerations by were three referred processes: to as first (i)- and emission second- fromphase radioactiveaccelerations nuclei, (ii)56 pair productionduring an eruption by nuclear by Wild deexcitation, et al. [8]. Accelerated and (iii) particles decay have of positively access to open charged and closed pions magnetic (π+) that take place57 whenstructures ions acceleratedassociated with in the eruption corona interactresulting within a number the ions of in electromagnetic the photosphere emissions/chromosphere. via Kozlovsky58 different et al. emission [14] list mechanisms. 156 positron-emitting Energetic particles radioactive escaping along nuclei interplanetary resulting magnetic from the field interaction lines of 59 are detected as solar energetic particle (SEP) events by particle detectors in space and on ground. protons and α-particles (helium nuclei) with 12 different elements and their isotopes. The most 60 These particles, originally known as solar cosmic rays, were first detected by Forbush [9] in the 1940s. important61 positron-emittingInvoking the copious radioactive production of nuclei energetic that particles result from from the the Sun, interaction Morrison [10] of protonssuggested (p) and 12 13 14 15 16 18 α-particles62 that with the active carbon Sun ( mustC, beC), a source nitrogen of gamma ( N, -rays.N), andHe listed oxygen electron ( O,-positronO) are annihilation listed in Table as one1. In the interaction63 of the of pprocesses and α withexpected16O, to the produce oxygen gamma nucleus,-ray emission ends up from in the co excitedsmic sources state [10] (16O*). Elliot of 6.052[11] MeV; 64 suggested that “positive electrons” from muon decay should lead to detectable 0.5 MeV gamma-ray 65 line emission. Lingenfelter and Ramaty [12] performed detailed calculations of gamma-ray emission Atoms 2020, 8, 14 3 of 12 this nucleus deexcites by emitting an electron-positron pair with a lifetime of 0.096 ns. Another such excited nucleus is 40Ca* with a lifetime of 3.1 ns. Kozlovsky et al. [15] list another set of 23 positron emitters produced when accelerated 3He interact with targets such as 12C, 14N, 16O, 20Ne, 24Mg, 28Si, and 56Fe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Five Common Particles
    The Five Common Particles The world around you consists of only three particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons form the nuclei of atoms, and electrons glue everything together and create chemicals and materials. Along with the photon and the neutrino, these particles are essentially the only ones that exist in our solar system, because all the other subatomic particles have half-lives of typically 10-9 second or less, and vanish almost the instant they are created by nuclear reactions in the Sun, etc. Particles interact via the four fundamental forces of nature. Some basic properties of these forces are summarized below. (Other aspects of the fundamental forces are also discussed in the Summary of Particle Physics document on this web site.) Force Range Common Particles It Affects Conserved Quantity gravity infinite neutron, proton, electron, neutrino, photon mass-energy electromagnetic infinite proton, electron, photon charge -14 strong nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton baryon number -15 weak nuclear force ≈ 10 m neutron, proton, electron, neutrino lepton number Every particle in nature has specific values of all four of the conserved quantities associated with each force. The values for the five common particles are: Particle Rest Mass1 Charge2 Baryon # Lepton # proton 938.3 MeV/c2 +1 e +1 0 neutron 939.6 MeV/c2 0 +1 0 electron 0.511 MeV/c2 -1 e 0 +1 neutrino ≈ 1 eV/c2 0 0 +1 photon 0 eV/c2 0 0 0 1) MeV = mega-electron-volt = 106 eV. It is customary in particle physics to measure the mass of a particle in terms of how much energy it would represent if it were converted via E = mc2.
    [Show full text]
  • Positronium and Positronium Ions from T
    674 Nature Vol. 292 20 August 1981 antigens, complement allotyping and Theoretically the reasons for expecting of HLA and immunoglobulin allotyping additional enzyme markers would clarify HLA and immunoglobulin-gene linked data together with other genetic markers the point. associations with immune response in and environmental factors should allow Although in the face of the evidence general and autoimmune disease in autoimmune diseases to be predicted presented one tends to think of tissue particular are overwhelming: HLA-DR exactly. However, there is still a typing at birth (to predict the occurrence of antigens (or antigens in the same considerable amount of analysis of both autoimmune disease) or perhaps even chromosome area) are necessary for H LA-region genes and lgG-region genes to before one goes to the computer dating antigen handling and presentation by a be done in order to achieve this goal in the service, there are practical scientific lymphoid cell subset; markers in this region general population. reasons for being cautious. For example, (by analogy with the mouse) are important In Japanese families, the occurrence of Uno et a/. selected only 15 of the 30 for interaction ofT cells during a response; Graves' disease can be exactly predicted on families studied for inclusion without immunoglobulin genes are also involved in the basis of HLA and immunoglobulin saying how or why this selection was made. T-cell recognition and control; HLA-A,-B allotypes, but it is too early to start wearing Second, lgG allotype frequencies are very and -C antigens are important at the "Are you my H LA type?" badges outside different in Caucasoid and Japanese effector arm of the cellular response; and Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • (Anti)Proton Mass and Magnetic Moment
    FFK Conference 2019, Tihany, Hungary Precision measurements of the (anti)proton mass and magnetic moment Wolfgang Quint GSI Darmstadt and University of Heidelberg on behalf of the BASE collaboration spokesperson: Stefan Ulmer 2019 / 06 / 12 BASE – Collaboration • Mainz: Measurement of the magnetic moment of the proton, implementation of new technologies. • CERN Antiproton Decelerator: Measurement of the magnetic moment of the antiproton and proton/antiproton q/m ratio • Hannover/PTB: Laser cooling project, new technologies Institutes: RIKEN, MPI-K, CERN, University of Mainz, Tokyo University, GSI Darmstadt, University of Hannover, PTB Braunschweig C. Smorra et al., EPJ-Special Topics, The BASE Experiment, (2015) WE HAVE A PROBLEM mechanism which created the obvious baryon/antibaryon asymmetry in the Universe is not understood One strategy: Compare the fundamental properties of matter / antimatter conjugates with ultra-high precision CPT tests based on particle/antiparticle comparisons R.S. Van Dyck et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 , 26 (1987). Recent B. Schwingenheuer, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4376 (1995). Past CERN H. Dehmelt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 , 4694 (1999). G. W. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. D 73 , 072003 (2006). Planned M. Hori et al., Nature 475 , 485 (2011). ALICE G. Gabriesle et al., PRL 82 , 3199(1999). J. DiSciacca et al., PRL 110 , 130801 (2013). S. Ulmer et al., Nature 524 , 196-200 (2015). ALICE Collaboration, Nature Physics 11 , 811–814 (2015). M. Hori et al., Science 354 , 610 (2016). H. Nagahama et al., Nat. Comm. 8, 14084 (2017). M. Ahmadi et al., Nature 541 , 506 (2017). M. Ahmadi et al., Nature 586 , doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0017 (2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions of Antiprotons with Atoms and Molecules
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Department of Energy Publications U.S. Department of Energy 1988 INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPROTONS WITH ATOMS AND MOLECULES Mitio Inokuti Argonne National Laboratory Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdoepub Part of the Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons Inokuti, Mitio, "INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPROTONS WITH ATOMS AND MOLECULES" (1988). US Department of Energy Publications. 89. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdoepub/89 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Energy at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Department of Energy Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. /'Iud Tracks Radial. Meas., Vol. 16, No. 2/3, pp. 115-123, 1989 0735-245X/89 $3.00 + 0.00 Inl. J. Radial. Appl .. Ins/rum., Part D Pergamon Press pic printed in Great Bntam INTERACTIONS OF ANTIPROTONS WITH ATOMS AND MOLECULES* Mmo INOKUTI Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, U.S.A. (Received 14 November 1988) Abstract-Antiproton beams of relatively low energies (below hundreds of MeV) have recently become available. The present article discusses the significance of those beams in the contexts of radiation physics and of atomic and molecular physics. Studies on individual collisions of antiprotons with atoms and molecules are valuable for a better understanding of collisions of protons or electrons, a subject with many applications. An antiproton is unique as' a stable, negative heavy particle without electronic structure, and it provides an excellent opportunity to study atomic collision theory.
    [Show full text]
  • First Search for Invisible Decays of Ortho-Positronium Confined in A
    First search for invisible decays of ortho-positronium confined in a vacuum cavity C. Vigo,1 L. Gerchow,1 L. Liszkay,2 A. Rubbia,1 and P. Crivelli1, ∗ 1Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland 2IRFU, CEA, University Paris-Saclay F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France (Dated: March 20, 2018) The experimental setup and results of the first search for invisible decays of ortho-positronium (o-Ps) confined in a vacuum cavity are reported. No evidence of invisible decays at a level Br (o-Ps ! invisible) < 5:9 × 10−4 (90 % C. L.) was found. This decay channel is predicted in Hidden Sector models such as the Mirror Matter (MM), which could be a candidate for Dark Mat- ter. Analyzed within the MM context, this result provides an upper limit on the kinetic mixing strength between ordinary and mirror photons of " < 3:1 × 10−7 (90 % C. L.). This limit was obtained for the first time in vacuum free of systematic effects due to collisions with matter. I. INTRODUCTION A. Mirror Matter The origin of Dark Matter is a question of great im- Mirror matter was originally discussed by Lee and portance for both cosmology and particle physics. The Yang [12] in 1956 as an attempt to preserve parity as existence of Dark Matter has very strong evidence from an unbroken symmetry of Nature after their discovery cosmological observations [1] at many different scales, of parity violation in the weak interaction. They sug- e.g. rotational curves of galaxies [2], gravitational lens- gested that the transformation in the particle space cor- ing [3] and the cosmic microwave background CMB spec- responding to the space inversion x! −x was not the trum.
    [Show full text]
  • BOTTOM, STRANGE MESONS (B = ±1, S = ∓1) 0 0 ∗ Bs = Sb, Bs = S B, Similarly for Bs ’S
    Citation: P.A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020) BOTTOM, STRANGE MESONS (B = ±1, S = ∓1) 0 0 ∗ Bs = sb, Bs = s b, similarly for Bs ’s 0 P − Bs I (J ) = 0(0 ) I , J, P need confirmation. Quantum numbers shown are quark-model predictions. Mass m 0 = 5366.88 ± 0.14 MeV Bs m 0 − mB = 87.38 ± 0.16 MeV Bs Mean life τ = (1.515 ± 0.004) × 10−12 s cτ = 454.2 µm 12 −1 ∆Γ 0 = Γ 0 − Γ 0 = (0.085 ± 0.004) × 10 s Bs BsL Bs H 0 0 Bs -Bs mixing parameters 12 −1 ∆m 0 = m 0 – m 0 = (17.749 ± 0.020) × 10 ¯h s Bs Bs H BsL = (1.1683 ± 0.0013) × 10−8 MeV xs = ∆m 0 /Γ 0 = 26.89 ± 0.07 Bs Bs χs = 0.499312 ± 0.000004 0 CP violation parameters in Bs 2 −3 Re(ǫ 0 )/(1+ ǫ 0 )=(−0.15 ± 0.70) × 10 Bs Bs 0 + − CKK (Bs → K K )=0.14 ± 0.11 0 + − SKK (Bs → K K )=0.30 ± 0.13 0 ∓ ± +0.10 rB(Bs → Ds K )=0.37−0.09 0 ± ∓ ◦ δB(Bs → Ds K ) = (358 ± 14) −2 CP Violation phase βs = (2.55 ± 1.15) × 10 rad λ (B0 → J/ψ(1S)φ)=1.012 ± 0.017 s λ = 0.999 ± 0.017 A, CP violation parameter = −0.75 ± 0.12 C, CP violation parameter = 0.19 ± 0.06 S, CP violation parameter = 0.17 ± 0.06 L ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → J/ψ K (892) ) = −0.05 ± 0.06 k ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → J/ψ K (892) )=0.17 ± 0.15 ⊥ ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → J/ψ K (892) ) = −0.05 ± 0.10 + − ACP (Bs → π K ) = 0.221 ± 0.015 0 + − ∗ 0 ACP (Bs → [K K ]D K (892) ) = −0.04 ± 0.07 HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page1 Created:6/1/202008:28 Citation: P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Energy Transport of the Solar Convection Zone A
    Structure and Energy Transport of the Solar Convection Zone A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ASTRONOMY December 2004 By James D. Armstrong Dissertation Committee: Jeffery R. Kuhn, Chairperson Joshua E. Barnes Rolf-Peter Kudritzki Jing Li Haosheng Lin Michelle Teng © Copyright December 2004 by James Armstrong All Rights Reserved iii Acknowledgements The Ph.D. process is not a path that is taken alone. I greatly appreciate the support of my committee. In particular, Jeff Kuhn has been a friend as well as a mentor during this time. The author would also like to thank Frank Moss of the University of Missouri St. Louis. His advice has been quite helpful in making difficult decisions. Mark Rast, Haosheng Lin, and others at the HAO have assisted in obtaining data for this work. Jesper Schou provided the helioseismic rotation data. Jorgen Christiensen-Salsgaard provided the solar model. This work has been supported by NASA and the SOHOjMDI project (grant number NAG5-3077). Finally, the author would like to thank Makani for many interesting discussions. iv Abstract The solar irradiance cycle has been observed for over 30 years. This cycle has been shown to correlate with the solar magnetic cycle. Understanding the solar irradiance cycle can have broad impact on our society. The measured change in solar irradiance over the solar cycle, on order of0.1%is small, but a decrease of this size, ifmaintained over several solar cycles, would be sufficient to cause a global ice age on the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision of a Positron with the Capture of an Electron from Lithium and the Effect of a Magnetic Field on the Particles Balance
    chemosensors Article Collision of a Positron with the Capture of an Electron from Lithium and the Effect of a Magnetic Field on the Particles Balance Elena V. Orlenko 1,* , Alexandr V. Evstafev 1 and Fedor E. Orlenko 2 1 Theoretical Physics Department, Institute of Physics, Nanotechnology and Telecommunication, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] 2 Scientific and Educational Center for Biophysical Research in the Field of Pharmaceuticals, Saint Petersburg State Chemical Pharmaceutical University (SPCPA), 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-911-762-7228 Abstract: The processes of scattering slow positrons with the possible formation of positronium play an important role in the diagnosis of both composite materials, including semiconductor materials, and for the analysis of images obtained by positron tomography of living tissues. In this paper, we consider the processes of scattering positrons with the capture of an electron and the formation of positronium. When calculating the cross-section for the capture reaction, exchange effects caused by the rearrangement of electrons between colliding particles are taken into account. Comparison of the results of calculating the cross-section with a similar problem of electron capture by a proton showed that the mass effect is important in such a collision process. The loss of an electron by a lithium atom is more effective when it collides with a positron than with a proton or alpha particles. The dynamic equilibrium of the formation of positronium in the presence of a strong magnetic Citation: Orlenko, E.V.; Evstafev, A.V.; field is considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Radiation
    5 Solar Radiation In this chapter we discuss the aspects of solar radiation, which are important for solar en- ergy. After defining the most important radiometric properties in Section 5.2, we discuss blackbody radiation in Section 5.3 and the wave-particle duality in Section 5.4. Equipped with these instruments, we than investigate the different solar spectra in Section 5.5. How- ever, prior to these discussions we give a short introduction about the Sun. 5.1 The Sun The Sun is the central star of our solar system. It consists mainly of hydrogen and helium. Some basic facts are summarised in Table 5.1 and its structure is sketched in Fig. 5.1. The mass of the Sun is so large that it contributes 99.68% of the total mass of the solar system. In the center of the Sun the pressure-temperature conditions are such that nuclear fusion can Table 5.1: Some facts on the Sun Mean distance from the Earth 149 600 000 km (the astronomic unit, AU) Diameter 1392000km(109 × that of the Earth) Volume 1300000 × that of the Earth Mass 1.993 ×10 27 kg (332 000 times that of the Earth) Density(atitscenter) >10 5 kg m −3 (over 100 times that of water) Pressure (at its center) over 1 billion atmospheres Temperature (at its center) about 15 000 000 K Temperature (at the surface) 6 000 K Energy radiation 3.8 ×10 26 W TheEarthreceives 1.7 ×10 18 W 35 36 Solar Energy Internal structure: core Subsurface ows radiative zone convection zone Photosphere Sun spots Prominence Flare Coronal hole Chromosphere Corona Figure 5.1: The layer structure of the Sun (adapted from a figure obtained from NASA [ 28 ]).
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1. Introduction the Phenomenon of Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy
    PRINCIPLES OF POSITRON ANNIHILATION Chapter-1 __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.1. Introduction The phenomenon of positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) has been utilized as nuclear method to probe a variety of material properties as well as to research problems in solid state physics. The field of solid state investigation with positrons started in the early fifties, when it was recognized that information could be obtained about the properties of solids by studying the annihilation of a positron and an electron as given by Dumond et al. [1] and Bendetti and Roichings [2]. In particular, the discovery of the interaction of positrons with defects in crystal solids by Mckenize et al. [3] has given a strong impetus to a further elaboration of the PAS. Currently, PAS is amongst the best nuclear methods, and its most recent developments are documented in the proceedings of the latest positron annihilation conferences [4-8]. PAS is successfully applied for the investigation of electron characteristics and defect structures present in materials, magnetic structures of solids, plastic deformation at low and high temperature, and phase transformations in alloys, semiconductors, polymers, porous material, etc. Its applications extend from advanced problems of solid state physics and materials science to industrial use. It is also widely used in chemistry, biology, and medicine (e.g. locating tumors). As the process of measurement does not mostly influence the properties of the investigated sample, PAS is a non-destructive testing approach that allows the subsequent study of a sample by other methods. As experimental equipment for many applications, PAS is commercially produced and is relatively cheap, thus, increasingly more research laboratories are using PAS for basic research, diagnostics of machine parts working in hard conditions, and for characterization of high-tech materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 the Fundamentals of Nuclear Physics Outline Natural
    Outline Chapter 3 The Fundamentals of Nuclear • Terms: activity, half life, average life • Nuclear disintegration schemes Physics • Parent-daughter relationships Radiation Dosimetry I • Activation of isotopes Text: H.E Johns and J.R. Cunningham, The physics of radiology, 4th ed. http://www.utoledo.edu/med/depts/radther Natural radioactivity Activity • Activity – number of disintegrations per unit time; • Particles inside a nucleus are in constant motion; directly proportional to the number of atoms can escape if acquire enough energy present • Most lighter atoms with Z<82 (lead) have at least N Average one stable isotope t / ta A N N0e lifetime • All atoms with Z > 82 are radioactive and t disintegrate until a stable isotope is formed ta= 1.44 th • Artificial radioactivity: nucleus can be made A N e0.693t / th A 2t / th unstable upon bombardment with neutrons, high 0 0 Half-life energy protons, etc. • Units: Bq = 1/s, Ci=3.7x 1010 Bq Activity Activity Emitted radiation 1 Example 1 Example 1A • A prostate implant has a half-life of 17 days. • A prostate implant has a half-life of 17 days. If the What percent of the dose is delivered in the first initial dose rate is 10cGy/h, what is the total dose day? N N delivered? t /th t 2 or e Dtotal D0tavg N0 N0 A. 0.5 A. 9 0.693t 0.693t B. 2 t /th 1/17 t 2 2 0.96 B. 29 D D e th dt D h e th C. 4 total 0 0 0.693 0.693t /th 0.6931/17 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Nature of Matter
    Solved Problems on the Particle Nature of Matter Charles Asman, Adam Monahan and Malcolm McMillan Department of Physics and Astronomy University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Fall 1999; revised 2011 by Malcolm McMillan Given here are solutions to 5 problems on the particle nature of matter. The solutions were used as a learning-tool for students in the introductory undergraduate course Physics 200 Relativity and Quanta given by Malcolm McMillan at UBC during the 1998 and 1999 Winter Sessions. The solutions were prepared in collaboration with Charles Asman and Adam Monaham who were graduate students in the Department of Physics at the time. The problems are from Chapter 3 The Particle Nature of Matter of the course text Modern Physics by Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses and Curt A. Moyer, Saunders College Publishing, 2nd ed., (1997). Coulomb's Constant and the Elementary Charge When solving numerical problems on the particle nature of matter it is useful to note that the product of Coulomb's constant k = 8:9876 × 109 m2= C2 (1) and the square of the elementary charge e = 1:6022 × 10−19 C (2) is ke2 = 1:4400 eV nm = 1:4400 keV pm = 1:4400 MeV fm (3) where eV = 1:6022 × 10−19 J (4) Breakdown of the Rutherford Scattering Formula: Radius of a Nucleus Problem 3.9, page 39 It is observed that α particles with kinetic energies of 13.9 MeV or higher, incident on copper foils, do not obey Rutherford's (sin φ/2)−4 scattering formula. • Use this observation to estimate the radius of the nucleus of a copper atom.
    [Show full text]