DOCSLIB.ORG

Structure and Energy Transport of the Solar Convection Zone A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Structure and Energy Transport of the Solar Convection Zone A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ASTRONOMY December 2004 By James D. Armstrong Dissertation Committee: Jeffery R. Kuhn, Chairperson Joshua E. Barnes Rolf-Peter Kudritzki Jing Li Haosheng Lin Michelle Teng © Copyright December 2004 by James Armstrong All Rights Reserved iii Acknowledgements The Ph.D. process is not a path that is taken alone. I greatly appreciate the support of my committee. In particular, Jeff Kuhn has been a friend as well as a mentor during this time. The author would also like to thank Frank Moss of the University of Missouri St. Louis. His advice has been quite helpful in making difficult decisions. Mark Rast, Haosheng Lin, and others at the HAO have assisted in obtaining data for this work. Jesper Schou provided the helioseismic rotation data. Jorgen Christiensen-Salsgaard provided the solar model. This work has been supported by NASA and the SOHOjMDI project (grant number NAG5-3077). Finally, the author would like to thank Makani for many interesting discussions. iv Abstract The solar irradiance cycle has been observed for over 30 years. This cycle has been shown to correlate with the solar magnetic cycle. Understanding the solar irradiance cycle can have broad impact on our society. The measured change in solar irradiance over the solar cycle, on order of0.1%is small, but a decrease of this size, ifmaintained over several solar cycles, would be sufficient to cause a global ice age on the earth. By understanding the changes that cause the solar cycle one might be able to determine if longer period solar irradiance cycles exist. One possible cause of the irradiance cycle is that magnetic fields at the solar surface create "holes)} in the solar surface allowing more energy to be radiated. This class of models assumes that energy radiation from the un-perturbed quiet sun remains constant over the solar cycle, and that the solar surface features are effectively coupled to the entire convection zone. Energy excess or deficits from solar features are drawn from the entire solar convection zone, which reradiates the excess or deficit over the thermal time scale of the entire convection zone. A second proposed mechanism is that structural changes in the solar convection zone enhance energy transport during the solar maximum. The assumption is that magnetic fields generated near the base of the solar convection zone surface, bringing with them an increased energy flux. This excess energy is radiated by the solar surface and observed as the solar irradiance cycle. v Observations and simple physical modes are presented here. It will be shown that surface features alone do not cause the solar irradiance cycle. Another component is necessary. Strong evidence is also given that surface features only redistribute the surface energy flux in a spatial and angular fashion, but do not contribute to the solar irradiance cycle. vi Table of Contents Acknowledgements iv Abstract ... v List of Tables x List of Figures xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Prologue.... 1 1.2 Observational History . 2 1.3 Magnetic Cycle .... 6 1.4 The Solar Irradiance Cycle . 12 1.5 Proxy Models ........ 16 1.6 Generation and Initial Rise Of Magnetic Fields 19 Chapter 2: On Proxy Models for Solar Irradiance 31 2.1 Introduction . 31 2.2 Simulated Irradiance Data 32 2.3 Results.. 38 2.4 Discussion 39 Chapter 3: Structure Of the Solar Convection Zone 42 3.1 Abstract............ 44 vii 3.2 Introduction . 45 3.3 Non-Orthogonal Oblateness Calculations 46 3.4 Vector Harmonic Solution ... 48 3.5 Solar Rotation and Model Data 50 3.6 Results and Discussion 52 3.7 Conclusion..... 60 3.8 Acknowledgements 61 3.9 Discussion Of The Paper . 61 Chapter 4: Small Magnetic Flux Tubes - Facular Regions . 63 4.1 Introduction .... 63 4.2 Data and Analysis 69 4.3 Comparison To Models. 75 4.4 Conclusions ....... 82 Chapter 5: Sunspot Bright Rings 85 5.1 Introduction. 85 5.2 Observations. 90 5.3 A Simple Model . 97 5.4 Numerical Simulations 102 5.5 Results......... 105 5.5.1 Temperature Profiles 105 5.5.2 Reradiation Of Energy 109 5.5.3 Facular Contamination 110 5.6 Scattered Light 115 5.7 Discussion... 120 Chapter 6: Discussion and Conclusions 124 6.1 discussion . 124 viii 6.2 Conclusions .............................. .. 132 ix List of Tables 3.1 Shape Coefficients and Gravitational Oblateness .......... .. 55 3.2 Shape Coefficients and VSH-Eq. (6) Sol. differences for Quadratic Rotation Law ........................ 57 3.3 Shape Coefficients with Surface Rotation Matched Model 59 3.4 Shape Coefficients with Localized Radial and Angular Rotation Perturbations ................. ..... .. 60 5.1 Fraction of Energy Reradiated by Sunspot Bright Rings. 110 5.2 Scattered Light Corrections .... ............ 119 x List of Figures 1.1 Maunder (1922) This figure shows the observed latitude of sunspots over several cycles. .... .'. ........... .. 5 1.2 The stretching of magnetic fields (a-c) can be thought of as adding a toroidal (d-f) field to the original poloidal field. 9 1.3 a) A section of the solar disk is shown here for reference and comparison. b) Sunspots are considered to consist of uniformly dark areas, uniformly bright areas, and unchanged quiet sun. By measuring the area of the dark and bright regions the change in the solar irradiance is then calculated. 17 1.4 The difference between the solar rotation rate at the equator and 60 degrees longitude (wo""oo - WO=60o ). The position of the tachocline is 0 shown by the dotted line. In the inset the solar rotation rates at 0 , 30 0 and 600 is shown. ......................... .. 21 1.5 The entropy per unit mass up to an overall constant of integration is shown here. The solar convective zone has the highest per unit mass energy. Elsewhere the per unit mass entropy increases. The decrease near the solar surface is interpreted as evidence of the solar wind, and known concerns over helioseismic inversions near the solar surface. 29 xi 2.1 The contributions to the simulated irradiance data from sunspots and faculae are shown here. The lack of a periodic signal confirms that sunspots and faculae do not contribute to the irradiance cycle. .. .. 35 2.2 The modeled irradiance data is shown here. a) Shows the contribution from faculae. b) Shows the contribution from sunspots. c) Shows the total modeled irradiance plus the 120-day running average. .... .. 37 2.3 The 120 day average of the simulated irradiance data is shown with a solid line. The portion of the simulated solar cycle, which is not generated by faculae or sunspots is shown with the dot dash line. The residual resulting from a least squared fit of the simulated sunspots and faculae to the simulated irradiance is shown with a dashed line. The absence of any periodic signal in this residual is an indication the proxy models would not detect underlying irradiance cycles. ..... 40 3.1 Graphs of the vector harmonic components of acceleration vs. radius. The scaled A2,1,O, A4,3,O, and A4,5,O are plotted with dash-dot, dashed and solid lines, respectively. The A2,1,O, ~,3,O and A4,5,O terms have been scaled by -1, 10, and 50 to fit them on the same vertical scale.. 51 3.2 The variation of d2 with radius. The solid line shows the density oblateness computed using the VSH approach, and the dashed line shows the corresponding polynomical expansion. .......... .. 54 3.3 (a) Graph of d2 and 82 versus radius. The density and pressure surfaces are represented by the solid and dashed lines, respectively. (b) The variation of d4 (solid line) and 84 (dashed line) with radius. .... .. 56 xii 4.1 The simple hot wall model accurately describes the limb brightening profile of facular regions. The model assumes that a flux tube is a simple cylindrical depression in the solar surface. The walls are hot. The walls heat the floor. Larger faculae have cold floors since the walls are unable to heat the larger area. Small faculae have warm floors... 68 4.2 Red and Blue residual images are measures of the solar surface temeperature. The points each represent an individual pixel from PSPT data. The line is the theoretical computation of blue residual from the red residual based on a blackbody spectral distribution.. .. 70 4.3 The mean and standard deviation of CalIK residuals are shown here. Solid lines show means, while dashed lines show standard deviations. Lines with *'s include only pixels with a CalIK residual ofgreater than 0.1, while lines without symbols include all pixels with a CaIIK residual of greater than -0.05. The more sensitive cut of 0.1 shows some trend as a function of J1.. However, since the trend is similar in both the standard deviation and the mean, it is believed to be an artifact of incomplete limb darkening removal. 73 4.4 CaIlK is shown to be an effective tracer of magnetic flux density. CalIK is shown as a function of magnetic flux density, for varying values of J1.. Near disk center the magnetic field is seen to have a "v" shape with a very small region where the slope is nearly flat and thus CaIIK is unresponsive to increasing magnetic flux density. Near the limb, The functional form is more accurately described as a "u" shape. ... .. 74 xiii 4.5 The dependence of line of sight magnetic flux density is shown here. Each trace represents a bin of CalIK residual with a width of 0.02, ranging from a CalIK residual of 0 to 0.16.
Recommended publications
  • Solar Radiation

    Solar Radiation

    5 Solar Radiation In this chapter we discuss the aspects of solar radiation, which are important for solar en- ergy. After defining the most important radiometric properties in Section 5.2, we discuss blackbody radiation in Section 5.3 and the wave-particle duality in Section 5.4. Equipped with these instruments, we than investigate the different solar spectra in Section 5.5. How- ever, prior to these discussions we give a short introduction about the Sun. 5.1 The Sun The Sun is the central star of our solar system. It consists mainly of hydrogen and helium. Some basic facts are summarised in Table 5.1 and its structure is sketched in Fig. 5.1. The mass of the Sun is so large that it contributes 99.68% of the total mass of the solar system. In the center of the Sun the pressure-temperature conditions are such that nuclear fusion can Table 5.1: Some facts on the Sun Mean distance from the Earth 149 600 000 km (the astronomic unit, AU) Diameter 1392000km(109 × that of the Earth) Volume 1300000 × that of the Earth Mass 1.993 ×10 27 kg (332 000 times that of the Earth) Density(atitscenter) >10 5 kg m −3 (over 100 times that of water) Pressure (at its center) over 1 billion atmospheres Temperature (at its center) about 15 000 000 K Temperature (at the surface) 6 000 K Energy radiation 3.8 ×10 26 W TheEarthreceives 1.7 ×10 18 W 35 36 Solar Energy Internal structure: core Subsurface ows radiative zone convection zone Photosphere Sun spots Prominence Flare Coronal hole Chromosphere Corona Figure 5.1: The layer structure of the Sun (adapted from a figure obtained from NASA [ 28 ]).
  • The Sun and the Solar Corona

    The Sun and the Solar Corona

    SPACE PHYSICS ADVANCED STUDY OPTION HANDOUT The sun and the solar corona Introduction The Sun of our solar system is a typical star of intermediate size and luminosity. Its radius is about 696000 km, and it rotates with a period that increases with latitude from 25 days at the equator to 36 days at poles. For practical reasons, the period is often taken to be 27 days. Its mass is about 2 x 1030 kg, consisting mainly of hydrogen (90%) and helium (10%). The Sun emits radio waves, X-rays, and energetic particles in addition to visible light. The total energy output, solar constant, is about 3.8 x 1033 ergs/sec. For further details (and more accurate figures), see the table below. THE SOLAR INTERIOR VISIBLE SURFACE OF SUN: PHOTOSPHERE CORE: THERMONUCLEAR ENGINE RADIATIVE ZONE CONVECTIVE ZONE SCHEMATIC CONVECTION CELLS Figure 1: Schematic representation of the regions in the interior of the Sun. Physical characteristics Photospheric composition Property Value Element % mass % number Diameter 1,392,530 km Hydrogen 73.46 92.1 Radius 696,265 km Helium 24.85 7.8 Volume 1.41 x 1018 m3 Oxygen 0.77 Mass 1.9891 x 1030 kg Carbon 0.29 Solar radiation (entire Sun) 3.83 x 1023 kW Iron 0.16 Solar radiation per unit area 6.29 x 104 kW m-2 Neon 0.12 0.1 on the photosphere Solar radiation at the top of 1,368 W m-2 Nitrogen 0.09 the Earth's atmosphere Mean distance from Earth 149.60 x 106 km Silicon 0.07 Mean distance from Earth (in 214.86 Magnesium 0.05 units of solar radii) In the interior of the Sun, at the centre, nuclear reactions provide the Sun's energy.
  • The Solar Core As Never Seen Before

    The Solar Core As Never Seen Before

    The solar core as never seen before A. Eff-Darwich1;2, S.G. Korzennik3 1 Instituto de Astrof´ısicade Canarias (IAC), E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 2 Dept. de Edafolog´ıay Geolog´ıa,Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 3 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St. Cambridge, MA,02138, USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. One of the main drawbacks in the analysis of the dynamics of the solar core comes from the lack of consistent data sets that cover the low and intermediate degree range (` = 1; 200). It is usually necessary to merge data obtained from different instruments and/or fitting methodologies and hence one introduces undesired systematic errors. In contrast, we present the results of analyzing MDI rotational splittings derived by a single fitting methodology applied to 4608-, 2304-, etc..., down to 182-day long time series. The direct comparison of these data sets and the analysis of the numerical inversion results have allowed us to constrain the dynamics of the solar core and to establish the accuracy of these data as a function of the length of the time-series. 1. Introduction Ground-based helioseismic observations, e.g., GONG [5], and space-based ones, e.g., MDI [10] or GOLF [4], have allowed us to derive a good description of the dynamics of the solar interior [12], [2], [6]. Such helioseismic inferences have confirmed that the differential rotation observed at the surface persists throughout the convection zone. The outer radiative zone (0:3 < r=R < 0:7) appears to rotate approximately as a solid body at an almost constant rate (≈ 430 nHz), whereas the innermost core (0:19 < r=R < 0:3) rotates slightly faster than the rest of the radiative region.
  • The Solar System

    The Solar System

    The Solar System Our automated spacecraft have traveled to the Moon and to all the planets beyond our world The Sun appears to have been active for 4.6 billion years and has enough fuel for another 5 except Pluto; they have observed moons as large as small planets, flown by comets, and billion years or so. At the end of its life, the Sun will start to fuse helium into heavier elements sampled the solar environment. The knowledge gained from our journeys through the solar and begin to swell up, ultimately growing so large that it will swallow Earth. After a billion years system has redefined traditional Earth sciences like geology and meteorology and spawned an as a "red giant," it will suddenly collapse into a "white dwarf" -- the final end product of a star like entirely new discipline called comparative planetology. By studying the geology of planets, ours. It may take a trillion years to cool off completely. moons, asteroids, and comets, and comparing differences and similarities, we are learning more about the origin and history of these bodies and the solar system as a whole. We are also Mercury gaining insight into Earth's complex weather systems. By seeing how weather is shaped on other worlds and by investigating the Sun's activity and its influence through the solar system, Obtaining the first close-up views of Mercury was the primary objective of the Mariner 10 we can better understand climatic conditions and processes on Earth. spacecraft, launched Nov 3, 1973. After a journey of nearly 5 months, including a flyby of Venus, the spacecraft passed within 703 km (437 mi) of the solar system's innermost planet on Mar 29, The Sun 1974.
  • Stellar Evolution

    Stellar Evolution

    AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education Page 1 of 19 www.accessscience.com Stellar evolution Contributed by: James B. Kaler Publication year: 2014 The large-scale, systematic, and irreversible changes over time of the structure and composition of a star. Types of stars Dozens of different types of stars populate the Milky Way Galaxy. The most common are main-sequence dwarfs like the Sun that fuse hydrogen into helium within their cores (the core of the Sun occupies about half its mass). Dwarfs run the full gamut of stellar masses, from perhaps as much as 200 solar masses (200 M,⊙) down to the minimum of 0.075 solar mass (beneath which the full proton-proton chain does not operate). They occupy the spectral sequence from class O (maximum effective temperature nearly 50,000 K or 90,000◦F, maximum luminosity 5 × 10,6 solar), through classes B, A, F, G, K, and M, to the new class L (2400 K or 3860◦F and under, typical luminosity below 10,−4 solar). Within the main sequence, they break into two broad groups, those under 1.3 solar masses (class F5), whose luminosities derive from the proton-proton chain, and higher-mass stars that are supported principally by the carbon cycle. Below the end of the main sequence (masses less than 0.075 M,⊙) lie the brown dwarfs that occupy half of class L and all of class T (the latter under 1400 K or 2060◦F). These shine both from gravitational energy and from fusion of their natural deuterium. Their low-mass limit is unknown.
  • 198Lapj. . .243. .945G the Astrophysical Journal, 243:945-953

    198Lapj. . .243. .945G the Astrophysical Journal, 243:945-953

    .945G .243. The Astrophysical Journal, 243:945-953, 1981 February 1 . © 1981. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. 198lApJ. CONVECTION AND MAGNETIC FIELDS IN STARS D. J. Galloway High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research1 AND N. O. Weiss Sacramento Peak Observatory2 Received 1980 March 10; accepted 1980 August 18 ABSTRACT Recent observations have demonstrated the unity of the study of stellar and solar magnetic fields. Results from numerical experiments on magnetoconvection are presented and used to discuss the concentration of magnetic flux into isolated ropes in the turbulent convective zones of the Sun or other late-type stars. Arguments are given for siting the solar dynamo at the base of the convective zone. Magnetic buoyancy leads to the emergence of magnetic flux in active regions, but weaker flux ropes are shredded and dispersed throughout the convective zone. The observed maximum field strengths in late-type stars should be comparable with the field (87rp)1/2 that balances the photospheric pressure. Subject headings: convection — hydrodynamics — stars: magnetic — Sun : magnetic fields I. INTRODUCTION In § II we summarize the results obtained for simplified The Sun is unique in having a magnetic field that can be models of hydromagnetic convection. The structure of mapped in detail, but magnetic activity seems to be a turbulent magnetic fields is then described in § III. standard feature of stars with deep convective envelopes. Theory and observation are brought together in § IV, Fields of 2000 gauss or more have been found in two where we discuss the formation of isolated flux tubes in late-type main sequence stars (Robinson, Worden, and the interior of the Sun.
  • Structure of the Sun

    Structure of the Sun

    HELIOSEISMOLOGY (I) STRUCTURE OF THE SUN ² The Sun is the only star for which we can measure internal properties ! test of stellar structure theory ² acoustic mode Composition (heavy elements) from meteorites in the Sun ² (p mode Density, internal rotation from helioseismology n=14, l -20) ² Central conditions from neutrinos HELIOSEISMOLOGY ² The Sun acts as a resonant cavity, oscillating in mil- lions of (acoustic, gravity) modes (like a bell) ! can be used to reconstruct the internal density struc- ture (like earthquakes on Earth) full-disk ² oscillation modes are excited by convective eddies Dopplergram ² periods of typical modes: 1.5 min to 20 min ² velocity amplitudes: » 0:1 m/s ² need to measure Doppler shifts in spectral lines rela- tive to their width to an accuracy of 1:106 . possible with good spectrometers and long integra- tion times (to average out noise) Results ² density structure, sound speed ² depth of outer convective zone: » 0:28 R¯ velocity (km/s) ² rotation in the core is slow (almost like a solid-body) ! the core must have been spun-down with the enve- lope (e±cient core{envelope coupling) SOLAR NEUTRINOS ² Neutrinos, generated in solar core, escape from the Sun and carry away 2 ¡ 6 % of the energy released in H-burning reactions HELIOSEISMOLOGY (II) ² they can be observed in underground experiments ! direct probe of the solar core ² neutrino-emitting reactions (in the pp chains) 1 1 2 + max + ! + + = : H H D e E 0 42 Mev 7 ¡ 7 max + ! + = : Be e Li E 0 86 Mev 8 8 + max ! + + = : B Be e E 14 0 Mev ² The Davis experiment (starting around 1970) has shown that the neutrino flux is about a factor of 3 lower than predicted ! the solar neutrino problem The Homestake experiment (Davis) ² neutrino detector: underground tank ¯lled with 600 tons of Chlorine (C2 Cl4 : dry-cleaning fluid) ² some neutrinos react with Cl 37 37 ¡ e + Cl ! Ar + e ¡ 0:81 Mev ² rate of absorption » 3 £ 10¡35 s¡1 per 37Cl atom ² every 2 months each 37Ar atom is ¯ltered out of the rotation rate (nHz) tank (expected number: 54; observed number: 17) ² caveats convection zone .
  • How Stars Work: • Basic Principles of Stellar Structure • Energy Production • the H-R Diagram

    How Stars Work: • Basic Principles of Stellar Structure • Energy Production • the H-R Diagram

    Ay 122 - Fall 2004 - Lecture 7 How Stars Work: • Basic Principles of Stellar Structure • Energy Production • The H-R Diagram (Many slides today c/o P. Armitage) The Basic Principles: • Hydrostatic equilibrium: thermal pressure vs. gravity – Basics of stellar structure • Energy conservation: dEprod / dt = L – Possible energy sources and characteristic timescales – Thermonuclear reactions • Energy transfer: from core to surface – Radiative or convective – The role of opacity The H-R Diagram: a basic framework for stellar physics and evolution – The Main Sequence and other branches – Scaling laws for stars Hydrostatic Equilibrium: Stars as Self-Regulating Systems • Energy is generated in the star's hot core, then carried outward to the cooler surface. • Inside a star, the inward force of gravity is balanced by the outward force of pressure. • The star is stabilized (i.e., nuclear reactions are kept under control) by a pressure-temperature thermostat. Self-Regulation in Stars Suppose the fusion rate increases slightly. Then, • Temperature increases. (2) Pressure increases. (3) Core expands. (4) Density and temperature decrease. (5) Fusion rate decreases. So there's a feedback mechanism which prevents the fusion rate from skyrocketing upward. We can reverse this argument as well … Now suppose that there was no source of energy in stars (e.g., no nuclear reactions) Core Collapse in a Self-Gravitating System • Suppose that there was no energy generation in the core. The pressure would still be high, so the core would be hotter than the envelope. • Energy would escape (via radiation, convection…) and so the core would shrink a bit under the gravity • That would make it even hotter, and then even more energy would escape; and so on, in a feedback loop Ë Core collapse! Unless an energy source is present to compensate for the escaping energy.
  • Single and Binary Evolution of Population III Stars and Their Supernova Explosions � T

    Single and Binary Evolution of Population III Stars and Their Supernova Explosions T

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 384, 1533–1543 (2008) doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12810.x Single and binary evolution of Population III stars and their supernova explosions T. M. Lawlor,1 T. R. Young,2 T. A. Johnson3 and J. MacDonald4 1Department of Physics, Penn State University, Brandywine, Media, PA 19063, USA 2Department of Physics, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA 3Department of Math, Science & Technology, University of Minnesota, Crookston, Crookston, MN 56716 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA Accepted 2007 November 30. Received 2007 November 30; in original form 2007 October 12 ABSTRACT We present stellar evolution calculations for Population III stars for both single- and binary- star evolutions. Our models include 10- and 16.5-M single stars and a 10-M model star that undergoes an episode of accretion resulting in a final mass of 16.1 M. For comparison, we present the evolution of a solar heavy element abundance model. We use the structure from late-stage evolution models to calculate simulated supernova light curves. Light curve comparisons are made between accretion and non-accretion progenitor models, and models for single-star evolution of comparable masses. Where possible, we make comparisons to previous works. Similar investigations have been carried out, but primarily for solar or near-solar heavy metal abundance stars and not including both the evolution and the supernova explosions in one work. Key words: binaries: general – stars: evolution – supernovae: general. low-mass, very low Z object He 0107–5240 ([Fe/H] =−5.3) as an 1 INTRODUCTION example of a possible Pop III star that makes it difficult to rule out It is commonly believed that the first stars, Population III (Pop III) low-mass fragments.
  • UNDERSTANDING SPACE WEATHER Part III: the Sun’S Domain

    UNDERSTANDING SPACE WEATHER Part III: the Sun’S Domain

    UNDERSTANDING SPACE WEATHER Part III: The Sun’s Domain KEITH STRONG, NICHOLEEN VIALL, JOAN SCHMELZ, AND JULIA SABA The solar wind is a continuous, varying outflow of high-temperature plasma, traveling at hundreds of kilometers per second and stretching to over 100 au from the Sun. his paper is the third in a series of five papers Our intention is to provide a basic context so that about understanding the phenomena that cause they can produce more informative and interesting T space weather and their impacts. These papers program content with respect to space weather. are a primer for meteorological and climatological Strong et al. (2012, hereafter Part I) described the students who may be interested in the outside forces production of solar energy and its tortuous journey that directly or indirectly affect Earth’s neutral at- from the solar core to the surface. That paper dealt mosphere. The series is also designed to provide with long-term variations of the solar output. Strong background information for the many media weather et al. (2017, hereafter Part II) addressed issues related forecasters who often refer to solar-related phenom- to short-term solar variability (primarily flares and ena such as flares, coronal mass ejections (CMEs), CMEs). This paper (Part III) deals with the variations coronal holes, and geomagnetic storms. Often those in the outflow of particles from the Sun throughout the presentations are misleading or definitively wrong. solar system to its outer boundaries: the Sun’s domain (see Fig. 1). The forthcoming Part IV (“The Sun–Earth Connection”) will deal with how the variable solar AFFILIATIONS: STRONG,* VIALL, AND SABA*—NASA Goddard radiation, magnetic field, and particle outputs inter- Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland; SCHMELZ—Universities act with Earth’s magnetic field and atmosphere.
  • The Sun: Our Star (Chapter 14) Based on Chapter 14

    The Sun: Our Star (Chapter 14) Based on Chapter 14

    The Sun: Our Star (Chapter 14) Based on Chapter 14 • No subsequent chapters depend on the material in this lecture • Chapters 4, 5, and 8 on “Momentum, energy, and matter”, “Light”, and “Formation of the solar system” will be useful for understanding this chapter. Goals for Learning • What is the Sun’s structure? • How does the Sun produce energy? • How does energy escape from the Sun? • What is solar activity? What Makes the Sun Shine? • Sun’s size/distance known by 1850s • Some kind of burning, chemical reaction? – Can’t provide enough energy • Gravitational potential energy from contraction? – Sun doesn’t shrink very fast, shines for 25 million years • Physicists like this idea. Geologists don’t, because rocks/fossils suggest age of 100s of millions of years E=mc2 (1905, Einstein) • Massive Sun has enough energy to shine for billions of years, geologists are happy • But how does “m” become “E”? Sun is giant ball of plasma (ionized gas) Charged particles in plasma are affected by magnetic fields Magnetic fields are very important in the Sun Sun = 300,000 ME Sun >1000 MJ Radius = 700,000 km Radius > 100 RE 3.8 x 1026 Watts Rotation: 25 days (Equator) Rotation: 30 days (Poles) Surface T = 5,800 K Core T = 15 million K 70% Hydrogen, 28% Helium, 2% heavier elements Solar Wind • Stream of charged particles blown continually outwards from Sun • Shapes the magnetospheres of the planets today • Cleared away the gas of the solar nebula 4.5 billion years ago Corona • Low density outer layer of Sun’s atmosphere • Extends several million km high • T = 1 million K (why?) • Source of solar X-ray emissions – what wavelength? X-ray image of solar corona.
  • Chapter 15--Our

    Chapter 15--Our

    2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch15/pt5 6/25/03 3:40 PM Page 495 PART V STELLAR ALCHEMY 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch15/pt5 6/25/03 3:40 PM Page 496 15 Our Star LEARNING GOALS 15.1 Why Does the Sun Shine? • Why was the Sun dimmer in the distant past? • What process creates energy in the Sun? • How do we know what is happening inside the Sun? • Why does the Sun’s size remain stable? • What is the solar neutrino problem? Is it solved ? • How did the Sun become hot enough for fusion 15.4 From Core to Corona in the first place? • How long ago did fusion generate the energy we 15.2 Plunging to the Center of the Sun: now receive as sunlight? An Imaginary Journey • How are sunspots, prominences, and flares related • What are the major layers of the Sun, from the to magnetic fields? center out? • What is surprising about the temperature of the • What do we mean by the “surface” of the Sun? chromosphere and corona, and how do we explain it? • What is the Sun made of? 15.5 Solar Weather and Climate 15.3 The Cosmic Crucible • What is the sunspot cycle? • Why does fusion occur in the Sun’s core? • What effect does solar activity have on Earth and • Why is energy produced in the Sun at such its inhabitants? a steady rate? 496 2396_AWL_Bennett_Ch15/pt5 6/25/03 3:40 PM Page 497 I say Live, Live, because of the Sun, from some type of chemical burning similar to the burning The dream, the excitable gift.