DOCSLIB.ORG

Fort Mchenry National Monument and Historic Shrine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fort Mchenry National Monument and Historic Shrine NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior RECEIVED 2280 National Park Service National Register of Historic Places MAR "~ o '^99 Registration Form IW EP'SJER:OF HISTORIC This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties an< implete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete eacn iteirt liy lliaiKIng in tho i ippropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Fnrl" MrHcvnry other names/site number Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine 2. Location street & number Locust Point * £tt ssst snd of Fort D not for publication city or town __ _ S vicinity state Maryland code MD countyBaltimore (City) code 510 zip code 21230 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, 1 hereby certify that this D nomination G request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property H meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. 1 recommend that this property be considered significant E nationaljy D statewide D locally. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) /yx*^ X /£n^t£e~ 3-t'W Signature of certifying offiofal/Title 0 Date National Park Service State of Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property D meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: Signature of the Keeper Date of Action D entered in the National Register. D See continuation sheet. D determined eligible for the National Register D See continuation sheet. n determined not eligible for the National Register. removed from the National Register. other, (explain:) _________ Additional Documentation Accepted Baltimore Citv. MD Name of Property County and State 5. ClassificaticMT""""" f - «"," .'! ! Ownership of 'roparty Category t>f Property Number of Resources within Property * (Check as many b ixes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) D private '> ^ '' o^building(s) Contributing Noncontributing D public-l( >cal S district 004 006 buildings D public-? State D site H public-F ederal D structure 009 000 sites D object n ~ 0 nn r- structures (JjZ. (J\JJ nn7 nnA objects UU/ UUn ~ e ~ m r Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) in the National Register N/A ________________ ___ 001 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Defense: fortification/military facility/ Recreation and Culture: monument/museum/ battle site/arms storage_____________ park____________________________ 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Late 18th century star fort foundation stone; brick——————————————— 19th century fortifications and powder walls brick maoonry/atono; earth; concrete magazine_______________________ 19th century barracks roof earth/tin/slate_________________ other Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) * Please note that the contributing resources generally correspond to Fort McHenry's List of Classified Structures (LCS). In some instances single LCS entries encompass multiple resources (e.g. the water battery guns and emplacements [LCS No. 81221] consists of 11 cannons and 24 gun emplacements, but are counted as one contributing structure). Baltimore City, MD Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria 'Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) for National Register listing.) Military; engineering Hi A Property is associated with events that have made Literature; poetry a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. Art; sculpture Conservation; historic preservation Gj_ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Archeology; historic/non-aboriginal Hi C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Period of Significance individual distinction. (1794-1802) to 1945 £] D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Significant Dates (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) 1814 _______ Property is: D A owned by a religious institution or used for 1322 religious purposes. Significant Person D B removed from its original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) Francis Scott Key _______ D C a birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation D D a cemetery. N/A ______ D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. D F a commemorative property. D G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance Architect/Builder within the past 50 years. Rivardi; Tousard» Foncin; Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibilography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: D preliminary determination of individual listing (36 D State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested D Other State agency 5 previously listed in the National Register B Federal agency D previously determined eligible by the National D Local government Register D University D designated a National Historic Landmark D Other Q recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Name of repository: # MD-63, 196-200, 204, 1096-1097 Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic D recorded by Historic American Engineering Shrine; library of Congress Record # _______________ ffnrt Baltimore City, MD Name of Property County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 43.26 UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) M I Ii8| |3l6i3l4i2iO I4i3l4i7l2i4i0 C? I 1 d 4 ft 4 ft 3 fi 4i3 4i7l2i5iO Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing r>2 ll 18 I |3 I .& 3 fii ni n |&_^ AI T! n fl rl D I li al ll 16' i3 I? 18 iQ I4i3l4i7l 2 I See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By name/title Steven R. Whissen/Historian organization Denver Service Center, National Park Service date July. 1997________ street & numberl2795 W. Alameda Pkwy., P. 0, 25287 telephone 303-969-2380 city or town Denver________________________ state CO_____ zip code 80225 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner____________________________________________ (Complete this item at the request of SHPO or FPO.) name___________________________________________________ street & number telephone city or town __ state zip code Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. NP« torn 1MOO« OM 4lpmMf No. (HO National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Baltimore City, MD Section
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Northgate Reconstruction
    131 7 THE NORTHGATE RECONSTRUCTION P Holder and J Walker INTRODUCTION have come from the supposedly ancient quarries at Collyhurst some few kilometres north-east of the The Unit was asked to provide advice and fort. As this source was not available, Hollington assistance to Manchester City Council so that the Red Sandstone from Staffordshire was used to form City could reconstruct the Roman fort wall and a wall of coursed facing blocks 200-320 mm long by defences at Manchester as they would have appeared 140-250 mm deep by 100-120 mm thick. York stone around the beginning of the 3rd century (Phase 4). was used for paving, steps and copings. A recipe for the right type of mortar, which consisted of This short report has been included in the volume three parts river sand, three parts building sand, in order that a record of the archaeological work two parts lime and one part white cement, was should be available for visitors to the site. obtained from Hampshire County Council. The Ditches and Roods The Wall and Rampart The Phase 4a (see Chapter 4, Area B) ditches were Only the foundations and part of the first course re-establised along their original line to form a of the wall survived (see Chapter 4, Phase 4, Area defensive circuit consisting of an outer V-shaped A). The underlying foundations consisted of ditch in front of a smaller inner ditch running interleaved layers of rammed clay and river close to the fort wall. cobble. On top of the foundations of the fort wall lay traces of a chamfered plinth (see Chapter 5g) There were three original roads; the main road made up of large red sandstone blocks, behind from the Northgate that ran up to Deansgate, the which was a rough rubble backing.
    [Show full text]
  • Galway City Walls Conservation, Management and Interpretation Plan
    GALWAY CITY WALLS CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT & INTERPRETATION PLAN MARCH 2013 Frontispiece- Woman at Doorway (Hall & Hall) Howley Hayes Architects & CRDS Ltd. were commissioned by Galway City Coun- cil and the Heritage Council to prepare a Conservation, Management & Interpre- tation Plan for the historic town defences. The surveys on which this plan are based were undertaken in Autumn 2012. We would like to thank all those who provided their time and guidance in the preparation of the plan with specialist advice from; Dr. Elizabeth Fitzpatrick, Dr. Kieran O’Conor, Dr. Jacinta Prunty & Mr. Paul Walsh. Cover Illustration- Phillips Map of Galway 1685. CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 UNDERSTANDING THE PLACE 6 3.0 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 17 4.0 ASSESSMENT & STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 28 5.0 DEFINING ISSUES & VULNERABILITY 31 6.0 CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES 35 7.0 INTERPRETATION & MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES 37 8.0 CONSERVATION STRATEGIES 41 APPENDICES Statutory Protection 55 Bibliography 59 Cartographic Sources 60 Fortification Timeline 61 Endnotes 65 1.0 INTRODUCTION to the east, which today retains only a small population despite the ambitions of the Anglo- Norman founders. In 1484 the city was given its charter, and was largely rebuilt at that time to leave a unique legacy of stone buildings The Place and carvings from the late-medieval period. Galway City is situated on the north-eastern The medieval street pattern has largely been shore of a sheltered bay on the west coast of preserved, although the removal of the walls Ireland. It is located at the mouth of the River during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Corrib, which separates the east and western together with extra-mural developments as the sides of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Mchenry - "Our Country" Bicentennial Festivities, Baltimore, MD, 7/4/75 (2)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 67, folder “Fort McHenry - "Our Country" Bicentennial Festivities, Baltimore, MD, 7/4/75 (2)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON '!0: Jack Marsh FROM: PAUL THEIS a>f Although belatedly, attached is some material on Ft. McHenry which our research office just sent in ••• and which may be helpful re the July 4th speech. Digitized from Box 67 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library :\iE\10 R.-\~ D l. \I THE \\'HITE HOI.SE \L\Sllli"GTO:'\ June 23, 1975 TO: PAUL 'IHEIS FROM: LYNDA DURFEE RE: FT. McHENRY FOURTH OF JULY CEREMONY Attached is my pre-advance report for the day's activities. f l I I / I FORT 1:vlc HENRY - July 4, 1975 Progran1 The program of events at Fort McHenry consists of two parts, with the President participating in the second: 11 Part I: "By the Dawn's Early Light • This is put on by the Baltimore Bicentennial Committee, under the direction of Walter S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antonine Wall, the Roman Frontier in Scotland, Was the Most and Northerly Frontier of the Roman Empire for a Generation from AD 142
    Breeze The Antonine Wall, the Roman frontier in Scotland, was the most and northerly frontier of the Roman Empire for a generation from AD 142. Hanson It is a World Heritage Site and Scotland’s largest ancient monument. The Antonine Wall Today, it cuts across the densely populated central belt between Forth (eds) and Clyde. In The Antonine Wall: Papers in Honour of Professor Lawrence Keppie, Papers in honour of nearly 40 archaeologists, historians and heritage managers present their researches on the Antonine Wall in recognition of the work Professor Lawrence Keppie of Lawrence Keppie, formerly Professor of Roman History and Wall Antonine The Archaeology at the Hunterian Museum, Glasgow University, who spent edited by much of his academic career recording and studying the Wall. The 32 papers cover a wide variety of aspects, embracing the environmental and prehistoric background to the Wall, its structure, planning and David J. Breeze and William S. Hanson construction, military deployment on its line, associated artefacts and inscriptions, the logistics of its supply, as well as new insights into the study of its history. Due attention is paid to the people of the Wall, not just the ofcers and soldiers, but their womenfolk and children. Important aspects of the book are new developments in the recording, interpretation and presentation of the Antonine Wall to today’s visitors. Considerable use is also made of modern scientifc techniques, from pollen, soil and spectrographic analysis to geophysical survey and airborne laser scanning. In short, the papers embody present- day cutting edge research on, and summarise the most up-to-date understanding of, Rome’s shortest-lived frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Martello Towers Research Project
    Martello Towers Research Project March 2008 Jason Bolton MA MIAI IHBC www.boltonconsultancy.com Conservation Consultant [email protected] Executive Summary “Billy Pitt had them built, Buck Mulligan said, when the French were on the sea”, Ulysses, James Joyce. The „Martello Towers Research Project‟ was commissioned by Fingal County Council and Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council, with the support of The Heritage Council, in order to collate all known documentation relating to the Martello Towers of the Dublin area, including those in Bray, Co. Wicklow. The project was also supported by Dublin City Council and Wicklow County Council. Martello Towers are one of the most well-known fortifications in the world, with examples found throughout Ireland, the United Kingdom and along the trade routes to Africa, India and the Americas. The towers are typically squat, cylindrical, two-storey masonry towers positioned to defend a strategic section of coastline from an invading force, with a landward entrance at first-floor level defended by a machicolation, and mounting one or more cannons to the rooftop gun platform. The Dublin series of towers, built 1804-1805, is the only group constructed to defend a capital city, and is the most complete group of towers still existing in the world. The report begins with contemporary accounts of the construction and significance of the original tower at Mortella Point in Corsica from 1563-5, to the famous attack on that tower in 1794, where a single engagement involving key officers in the British military became the catalyst for a global military architectural phenomenon. However, the design of the Dublin towers is not actually based on the Mortella Point tower.
    [Show full text]
  • REVITALIZATION of GOLUBAC FORTRESS - PROJECT DESIGN ALBO-Inzenjering Beograd D.O.O
    European Union Project Implemented Funded Project by Golubac Municipality REVITALIZATION OF GOLUBAC FORTRESS - PROJECT DESIGN ALBO-inzenjering Beograd d.o.o. preduzece za projektovanje i inzenjering - Beograd European Union Project Implemented Project Design and Feasibility Study Funded Project by Golubac Municipality for Revitalization of Golubac Fortress Chief Designer: MARIJA JOVIN, graduate architectural engineer Consultants for concept of revitalization: DR MIOMIR KORAC, archaeologist SINISA TEMERINSKI, architectural engineer Designers: ALEKSANDRA BANOVIC, graduate architectural engineer, town-planning solution VESNA VANDIC, graduate lawyer, program, legal and economic aspect NENAD KIS, graduate civil engineer, constructive system BRANISLAV JOVIN, graduate architectural engineer, town-planning solution SAVO DJAKONOVIC, graduate civil engineer, tunnel construction SLAVKO DJERFI, graduate civil engineer, transport solution Revitalization of Golubac Fortress NIKOLA CICA, graduate electrical engineer, lighting and electrical installations ILIJA MIHAJLOVIC, graduate mechanical engineer, thermo-technical installations BORIS HOROSAVIN, graduate art historian, computer visualization Project Design Belgrade 2009. Revitalization of the Golubac Fortress Contents Introduction 1 Transport structure 11 Legal basis and jurisdictions 1 Electrical system 15 Acts on Protection 1 Protection from atmospheric discharges 19 Macro location and geographical position of the Golubac fortress 1 Thermo-technical installations 19 Physical characteristics of
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the War of 1812 and the Star-Spangled Banner
    t t c c A History of the War of 1812 and The Star-Spangled e e j j Banner o o r r Objectives: Students will be able to cite the origins and outcome of the War of 1812 P P and be able to place the creation of the Star-Spangled Banner in a chronological framework. r r e e Time: 3 to 5 class periods, depending on extension activities n n Skills: Reading, chronological thinking, map-making. n Content Areas: Language Arts- Vocabulary, Language Arts- Reading, Social Studies- n a a Geography, Social Studies- United States history Materials: B B ♦ Poster board or oak tag d d ♦ Colored markers e e l l ♦ Pencils g g ♦ Copies of reading material n n a a Standards: p p NCHS History Standards S S K-4 Historical Thinking Standards - - 1A: Identify the temporal structure of a historical narrative or story. r r 1F: Create timelines. a a t t 5A: Identify problems and dilemmas confronting people in historical S S stories, myths, legends, and fables, and in the history of their school, community, state, nation, and the world. e e 5B: Analyze the interests, values, and points of view of those h h involved in the dilemma or problem situation. T T K-4 Historical Content Standards 4D: The student understands events that celebrate and exemplify fundamental values and principles of American democracy. 4E: The student understands national symbols through which American values and principles are expressed. 5-12 Historical Thinking Standards 1A: Identify the temporal structure of a historical narrative or story.
    [Show full text]
  • The Star Fort, September, 1814
    D-JLJ- UNITED STATES DEPARTHEI'irrr OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FORT MCHENRY NATIONAL MONUMENT AND HISTORIC SHRINE BALTIMORE 30, MARYLAND \\St ARtftlOlOGY The .Star Fort, September, 1814 Prepared by: Dr. W. Richard Walsh Contract Historian · Georgetown University Georgetown, D.C. November, 1958 r~ , .. I . ,. .. - •• '' I• ,•' --:• ' . '·· ~ -,, .. ., . · .· .. :· .·. • , :: .:'~ .: :/ F.1 _r1 .. .J '~ l. \ '. \~ IJ li :i. /:i1('fl ---. \J .. •• 1 : ... .. .. .. ,,.. - l ~ j Table of Contents Page Frontispiece ••••••••••••••• • • • • ii I. Introduction • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 II. The Star Fort, September 12-14, 1814 • • • • • • • 7 24 III. Conclusions. • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 • • • • • • ._: I f ,\ .. i ) ~ ',...___/ Errata p .. 2, line 60 '0 indiaten should read '0 indicate.io p. 3, line 4o "war-fare" should read 10 warfareo 18 p. a, line 8. "amatuer" should read "amateur.~ p .. 7, fn. 1, line 5. "principle" should read ~principal." p. 9, line 12. "wa.tteries" should read "batteries. ~ p. 10, · line 10. Delete "which." p .. 10, line 11. "patforms" should read "platforms." p. 10, line 17. "Descius" should read "Decius." p. 13, fn. \:1 9 line 5. "Jessup" should read "Jesupn in this and all subsequent mention of the name. o. 19, line 16~ "orciinarilly" should read "ordinarily .. '° p. 26, line 5. "Carrol" should read "Carroll." p. 26, line 7. "confederates" should read "Confederates." .a- -. ( ... ~ "'·. / I Introduction In 1776, Baltimore prepared itself for. attack by the British~ Already apprehensive because of threats from the sea by His Majesty's vessel, the Otter, the Committee of Safety choose Whetstone Point as the best fortifiable site against enemy destruction to the Baltimore harbor. A fort of sorts was therefore erected, but because the threat of a general naval attack never materialized and the actual fight­ ing of the war of the Revolution by-passed Baltimoreans, a well armed Fort vVhetstone was not accomplished.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Eben Appleton to Charles Walcott, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1912. New York December 12Th, 1912
    Letter from Eben Appleton to Charles Walcott, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1912. New York December 12th, 1912 Mr. Charles Walcott, Secty Smithsonian Institute Washington, D.C. Dear Sir: If agreeable to you and the authorities in charge of the National Museum, I shall be very glad to present to that Institution that flag owned by me, and now in possession of the Museum as a loan from me, and known as the Star-Spangled Banner. It has always been my intention to present the flag during my life time to that Institution in the country where it could be conveniently seen by the public, and where it would be well cared for, and the advantages and the appropriateness of the National Museum are so obvious, as to render consideration of any other place unnecessary. Whilst realizing that the poem of Mr. Key is the one thing which renders this flag of more than ordinary interest, it is only right to appreciate the fact that there was a cause for his inspiration. Being detained temporarily on board a British Man of War, he witnessed the bombardment of Fort McHenry, and was inspired by that dramatic scene to give to the Nation his beautiful lines. I must ask therefore, as a condition of this gift, and injustice to the Commandant of the Fort, and the brave men under him, that their share in the inspiration of this poem be embodied in the inscription to be placed in the case containing this flag. I have had forwarded to me copies of the inscriptions contained in the case at present, and do not think they could be improved upon, but as I desire now to make a specific choice, will say that the following is the one which I prefer, and should like to be assured by you will be the official marking-- The Star Spangled Banner Garrison Flag of Fort McHenry, Baltimore, during the bombardment of the Fort by the British Sept.13-14, 1814, when it was gallantly and successfully [sic.] defended by colonel George Armistead, and the brave men under him.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Viking Age Fortresses with Automatic Landscape Classification and Feature Detection
    remote sensing Article Searching for Viking Age Fortresses with Automatic Landscape Classification and Feature Detection David Stott 1,2, Søren Munch Kristiansen 2,3,* and Søren Michael Sindbæk 3 1 Department of Archaeological Science and Conservation, Moesgaard Museum, Moesgård Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark 2 Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 3 Center for Urban Network Evolutions (UrbNet), Aarhus University, Moesgård Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +45-2338-2424 Received: 19 June 2019; Accepted: 25 July 2019; Published: 12 August 2019 Abstract: Across the world, cultural heritage is eradicated at an unprecedented rate by development, agriculture, and natural erosion. Remote sensing using airborne and satellite sensors is an essential tool for rapidly investigating human traces over large surfaces of our planet, but even large monumental structures may be visible as only faint indications on the surface. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of a machine learning approach using airborne laser scanning data to address a “needle-in-a-haystack” problem, which involves the search for remnants of Viking ring fortresses throughout Denmark. First ring detection was applied using the Hough circle transformations and template matching, which detected 202,048 circular features in Denmark. This was reduced to 199 candidate sites by using their geometric properties and the application of machine learning techniques to classify the cultural and topographic context of the features. Two of these near perfectly circular features are convincing candidates for Viking Age fortresses, and two are candidates for either glacial landscape features or simple meteor craters.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Fort Mchenry.Pdf
    American Battlefield Trust Volume 5 BROADSIDE A Journal of the Wars for Independence for Students Fort McHenry and the Birth of an Anthem Of all the battles in American history none is more With a war being fought on the periphery of the Unit- connected with popular culture than the battle of Fort ed States the British, under the influence of Admiral McHenry fought during the War of 1812. The British George Cockburn, decided to bring the war more di- attack on Fort McHenry and the rectly to America by attacking the large garrison flag that could be Chesapeake Region. The British seen through the early morning Navy, with Marines and elements mist, inspired Washington, DC of their army wreaked havoc along lawyer Francis Scott Key to pen the Chesapeake burning numer- what in 1931 would be adopted ous town and settlements. Howev- by Congress as our National An- er, Cockburn had two prizes in them, the Star-Spangled Ban- mind – Washington, DC and Bal- ner. The anthem is played be- timore, Maryland. Retribution for fore countless sports events the burning of York was never far from high school through the from his mind and what a blow he ranks of professional games. thought, would it be to American The story of the creation of the morale if he could torch the still Star-Spangled Banner is as developing American capital. Af- compelling as the story of the ter pushing aside a motley assort- attack on Baltimore. ment of American defenders of the approach to Washington, DC In 1812, a reluctant President at the battle of Bladensburg, Mar- James Madison asked Congress yland, Cockburn and his forces for a Declaration of War against entered the city and put the torch Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Star-Spangled Banner Project: Save Our History[TM]. Teacher's Manual, Grades K-8
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 450 018 SO 032 384 AUTHOR O'Connell, Libby, Ed. TITLE The Star-Spangled Banner Project: Save Our History[TM]. Teacher's Manual, Grades K-8. PUB DATE 1998-00-00 NOTE 62p.; This teacher's manual was produced in cooperationwith the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History. AVAILABLE FROM A&E Television Networks, Attn: CommunityMarketing, 235 East 45th Street, New York, NY 10017; Tel: 877-87LEARN (toll free); Fax: 212-551-1540; E-mail: ([email protected]); Web site: http://www.historychannel.com/classroom/index.html. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Curriculum Enrichment; Elementary Education; *Heritage Education; *Interdisciplinary Approach; Middle Schools; Social Studies; Teaching Guides; *United States History IDENTIFIERS National History Standards; Smithsonian Institution; *Star Spangled Banner; War of 1812 ABSTRACT The Star-Spangled Banner is the original flag that flew over Fort McHenry in Baltimore (Maryland) during its attackby the British during the War of 1812. It inspired Francis Scott Key, a lawyerbeing held on board a British ship in Baltimore Harbor, towrite a poem that later became the words to the national anthem. Since 1907, the Star-Spangled Bannerhas been part of the collection at the Smithsonian Institutionand has hung as the centerpiece of the National Museum of American History inWashington for over 30 years. Now the flag is being examined, cleaned,repaired, and preserved for future generations. This teacher's manual about the flag'shistory features an interdisciplinary project that focuses on history,music, language arts, and science. Following an introduction, themanual is divided into grade-level sections: Section One: Grades K-2; Section Two:Grades 3-5; and Section Three: Grades 6-8.
    [Show full text]