DOCSLIB.ORG

The Northgate Reconstruction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Northgate Reconstruction 131 7 THE NORTHGATE RECONSTRUCTION P Holder and J Walker INTRODUCTION have come from the supposedly ancient quarries at Collyhurst some few kilometres north-east of the The Unit was asked to provide advice and fort. As this source was not available, Hollington assistance to Manchester City Council so that the Red Sandstone from Staffordshire was used to form City could reconstruct the Roman fort wall and a wall of coursed facing blocks 200-320 mm long by defences at Manchester as they would have appeared 140-250 mm deep by 100-120 mm thick. York stone around the beginning of the 3rd century (Phase 4). was used for paving, steps and copings. A recipe for the right type of mortar, which consisted of This short report has been included in the volume three parts river sand, three parts building sand, in order that a record of the archaeological work two parts lime and one part white cement, was should be available for visitors to the site. obtained from Hampshire County Council. The Ditches and Roods The Wall and Rampart The Phase 4a (see Chapter 4, Area B) ditches were Only the foundations and part of the first course re-establised along their original line to form a of the wall survived (see Chapter 4, Phase 4, Area defensive circuit consisting of an outer V-shaped A). The underlying foundations consisted of ditch in front of a smaller inner ditch running interleaved layers of rammed clay and river close to the fort wall. cobble. On top of the foundations of the fort wall lay traces of a chamfered plinth (see Chapter 5g) There were three original roads; the main road made up of large red sandstone blocks, behind from the Northgate that ran up to Deansgate, the which was a rough rubble backing. This rubble was intramural road that ran along the rampart, inside set in a coarse yellow mortar, benind which lay the fort, and a spur road (see Chapter 5, Phase 4, the remains of an earlier dumped clay rampart. It Area C) that led off from the main road and which was possible by using the angle of rest of the may have been linked to a route running to the rampart and the height of similar Roman walls, Roman site at Wigan. These roads were such as that at Caer Gybi, to estimate the reconstructed using 50% duckstones (60-80mm) and original height of the fort wall. The size of 50% pebbles (20-40mm) bound with gravel and rolled blocks used in the original construction could to mimic the original surface. also be gauged from part of the wall that was discovered by Professor GBD Jones and others, The Civilian Buildings where it had collapsed into what was left of an inner defensive ditch to the fort. At the heyday of the civilian settlement most of the timber framed walls of the civilian buildings Using this evidence and clues derived from were on red sandstone footings. The 'dwarf walls' existing Roman fort walls, a series of trials were of three buildings were recreated in simplified conducted on how to achieve the correct "look" for form. One building consisted of an outer square the stonework. In order to minimise costs it was room behind which ran two chambers, and is a copy decided that the wall would consist of a sandstone of a building plan recovered by Professor Jones in skim over a concrete base. Construction proved to 1972 (Jones and Grealey 1974). This building is be relatively easy especially as wall details typical of the larger civilian structures and the suggested by discoveries made in other places were original building with its large chamber facing not included, as no evidence for them had come onto the road may have been a small inn. Another from the extensive excavations in the area. The building is typical of those found throughout the red sandstone originally used by the Romans may North-West and in the northern vicus of Manchester 132 (Jones and Grealey 1974). It consists of a long Manchester City Council has recently reconstructed rectangular building, gable-on to the road and the Phase 4 very early 3rd century gateway of the divided into two chambers. Again the plan was fort to its full height (see Chapter 4, Phase 4, based upon examples from the 1972 excavations and Area A). Despite the previous excavations such buildings are thought to have constituted the undertaken in the area it was not until 1982 that normal house for most civilians. The third all the foundations of the gateway were fully building is modelled on a small two room booth exposed.These consisted of two L-shaped extensions (F727, Phase 3b, Area C) discovered during the to the wall and a central spine in the middle of 1982 season. the roadway, designed to support two arches. This plan is not typical of military gateways of the In order to soften the impact of the site and period around the turn of the 2nd century, but is intergrate its disparate elements, it is bordered paralleled to an extent by that found at by plants selected from species thought to have Bewcastle. Liversidge (1969, 63) proposed a been introduced to Britain by the Romans (Godwin reconstruction of the north-eastern postern gate 1975,474-81). at Colchester of c200 AD, which consists of a simple chamber with three windows over a single For the first phase of the scheme the Unit passage. Much of the outer face of the Colchester prepared a 45 page booklet on Roman walling gate was found lying on the ground nearby and techniques and the writer visited the site on a included fragments of two original windows. number of occasions during construction to make recommendations on specific problems. Gateways formed of two simple internal wings have been found in Romano-British town defences at The Gateway places such as the south and north gates at Silchester, the north-east gate at Colchester, the The Basic Plan west gate of the "old town" at Lincoln, and the London gate at Canterbury. Plate 7.1 The reconstructed site showing gateway, roads and vicus buildings 133 Research (Richmond and Childe 1942) suggests Given this hypothesis about the basic form of the however that, overall, gateways of this period and gate, it was possible to draw up a draft design type were based upon a unified design drawn from which was circulated to a number of British and earlier Augustan city gates which usually foreign scholars with an acknowledged expertise on consisted of circular or rectangular towers the subject. As their comments on the basic flanking a central room or rooms with a elevation were favourable, the problem had to be crenellated walkway above (Richmond !930).The late faced of how to provide enough detail to make it 2nd century Porta Nigra at Triers and the Porta possible for the architect, Mr Hatcherd, to Asinaria cAD 270 at Rome display this form. A produce working drawings. Several sources of classic example of a roofed windowed information were available: over-chambered gate with twin towers is preserved in a Roman clay model from Intercisa (Dunaujvaros) (a) The excavated evidence (Lengyel and Radon 1980, Plate LXI). Less well known is a 4th century Roman bronze model of a (b) The evidence from existing Roman twin portal gate with chamber over discovered in structures or literary works Sarmatian territory and now housed in the Hungarian National Museum (Lengyel and Radan I960, (c) Modern academic opinion. Plate XCV). Originally, the Bewcastle and the Manchester gates were probably simplified versions It was felt that the weight to be given to each of this basic design, in which the flanking towers source should be, wherever possible, that were not incorporated but the central chamber excavated evidence would supersede Roman sources, retained. This chamber was supported by a massive which would supersede received opinion. From this central spine which was set slightly back from the it was possible to draw up the following line of the wall, thus allowing small spines at contingency table of evidence for each element of the end of the rampart wall walks from which to the gateway on the basis of the frequency of the overlook the face of the gate. evidence known to the author. Plate 7.2 The outer face of the reconstructed Northgate 134 TABLE 7.1 SOURCE RANKING Problem Excavated Evidence Other Sites or Roman Academic Opinion Literary Evidence The Basic Plan 2 3 The Stonework 3 2 The Arches 2 Gate Chamber 2 The Fighting Platform 2 The Inscriptions 2 The resultant drawing was then modified in response to pratical architectural considerations. The following sources were then used to provide the details for the reconstruction: Plate 7.3 The outer face of the gate seen from the inner defensive ditch 135 Table 7.2 limited to a maximum of I 1.5 feet. This PRIMARY EVIDENCE USED IN THE RECONSTRUCTION calculation is based upon allowing 6T1 to the top of the impost, an arch radius of 4' 7.5", 5' 3" or Problem Primary Evidence 5' 6.5", 2' for the voussoirs, 2' 7.5" for the springer and 2' for the dedication tablet The Basic Plan The excavated remains (Richmond and Childe 1942, 145). The top of the impost was set at cl.7m in keeping with that The Stonework The excavated remains surviving at Great Chesters. The arch heights were set lower than Richmond and ChMde's calculations The Arches in order to ensure that it was possible to walk Height Richmond and Childe through at rampart level (Hobley 1982, 228).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Some Representative Examples of Romano-British Sculpture Author(S): F
    Some Representative Examples of Romano-British Sculpture Author(s): F. Haverfield and H. Stuart Jones Source: The Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 2 (1912), pp. 121-152 Published by: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/295954 . Accessed: 08/05/2014 23:47 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Roman Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 169.229.32.137 on Thu, 8 May 2014 23:47:48 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SOME REPRESENTATIVE EXAMPLES OF ROMANO-BRITISH SCULPTURE. (Plates IV-IX.) By PROFESSOR F. HAVERFIELD, LL.D. D.LITT. and H. STUART JONES, M.A. The collection of casts lately prepared by the Roman Society, and described in the following pages, was designed to include representative sculptures and architectural decorations of the Roman period in Britain. It had originally been hoped that these casts might find a place in the Archaeological Exhibition held in Rome in I9II and eloquently described by Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • New Methodologies for the Documentation of Fortified Architecture in the State of Ruins
    The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-5/W1, 2017 GEOMATICS & RESTORATION – Conservation of Cultural Heritage in the Digital Era, 22–24 May 2017, Florence, Italy NEW METHODOLOGIES FOR THE DOCUMENTATION OF FORTIFIED ARCHITECTURE IN THE STATE OF RUINS F. Fallavollita a, A. Ugolini a a Dept. of Architecture, University of Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento, 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy - (federico.fallavollita, andrea.ugolini)@unibo.it KEY WORDS: Castles, Laser Scanner, Digital Photogrammetry, Architectural Survey, Restoration ABSTRACT: Fortresses and castles are important symbols of social and cultural identity providing tangible evidence of cultural unity in Europe. They are items for which it is always difficult to outline a credible prospect of reuse, their old raison d'être- namely the military, political and economic purposes for which they were built- having been lost. In recent years a Research Unit of the University of Bologna composed of architects from different disciplines has conducted a series of studies on fortified heritage in the Emilia Romagna region (and not only) often characterized by buildings in ruins. The purpose of this study is mainly to document a legacy, which has already been studied in depth by historians, and previously lacked reliable architectural surveys for the definition of a credible as well as sustainable conservation project. Our contribution will focus on different techniques and methods used for the survey of these architectures, the characteristics of which- in the past- have made an effective survey of these buildings difficult, if not impossible. The survey of a ruin requires, much more than the evaluation of an intact building, reading skills and an interpretation of architectural spaces to better manage the stages of documentation and data processing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antonine Wall, the Roman Frontier in Scotland, Was the Most and Northerly Frontier of the Roman Empire for a Generation from AD 142
    Breeze The Antonine Wall, the Roman frontier in Scotland, was the most and northerly frontier of the Roman Empire for a generation from AD 142. Hanson It is a World Heritage Site and Scotland’s largest ancient monument. The Antonine Wall Today, it cuts across the densely populated central belt between Forth (eds) and Clyde. In The Antonine Wall: Papers in Honour of Professor Lawrence Keppie, Papers in honour of nearly 40 archaeologists, historians and heritage managers present their researches on the Antonine Wall in recognition of the work Professor Lawrence Keppie of Lawrence Keppie, formerly Professor of Roman History and Wall Antonine The Archaeology at the Hunterian Museum, Glasgow University, who spent edited by much of his academic career recording and studying the Wall. The 32 papers cover a wide variety of aspects, embracing the environmental and prehistoric background to the Wall, its structure, planning and David J. Breeze and William S. Hanson construction, military deployment on its line, associated artefacts and inscriptions, the logistics of its supply, as well as new insights into the study of its history. Due attention is paid to the people of the Wall, not just the ofcers and soldiers, but their womenfolk and children. Important aspects of the book are new developments in the recording, interpretation and presentation of the Antonine Wall to today’s visitors. Considerable use is also made of modern scientifc techniques, from pollen, soil and spectrographic analysis to geophysical survey and airborne laser scanning. In short, the papers embody present- day cutting edge research on, and summarise the most up-to-date understanding of, Rome’s shortest-lived frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Units and the Reliability of the Notitia Dignitatum, Pars Oriens
    Imperium and Officium Working Papers (IOWP) Egyptian Units and the reliability of the Notitia dignitatum, pars Oriens Version 01 April 2014 Anna Maria Kaiser (University of Vienna, Department of Ancient History, Papyrology and Epigraphy) Abstract: This study argues for the reliability of the Egyptian military lists in the pars Oriens of the Notitia Dignitatum and opposes the views of some scho-lars, who see the Not.Dig. as a purely ideological composition unrelated to historical reality and without value as an historical source. Deniers of the Not.Dig.’s reliability generally ignore the documentary evidence. For Egypt, papyrological documentation verifies the Not.Dig.’s accuracy—a circumstance not so readily available for other parts of the Roman Empire—and, complemented by archaeological evidence, provides a strong argument for the completeness and reliability of at least the Egyptian sections. Thus the probability of the Not.Dig.’s accuracy for other sections of the pars Oriens is also corroborated. © Anna Maria Kaiser 2014 [email protected] 1 Anna Maria Kaiser Egyptian Units and the reliability of the Notitia Dignitatum, pars Oriens* This study argues for the reliability of the Egyptian military lists in the pars Oriens of the Notitia Dignitatum and opposes the views of some scholars, who see the Not.Dig. as a purely ideological composition unrelated to historical reality and without value as an historical source. Deniers of the Not.Dig.’s reliability generally ignore the documentary evidence. For Egypt, papyrological documentation verifies the Not.Dig.’s accuracy—a circumstance not so readily available for other parts of the Roman Empire—and, complemented by archaeological evidence, provides a strong argument for the completeness and reliability of at least the Egyptian sections.
    [Show full text]
  • REVITALIZATION of GOLUBAC FORTRESS - PROJECT DESIGN ALBO-Inzenjering Beograd D.O.O
    European Union Project Implemented Funded Project by Golubac Municipality REVITALIZATION OF GOLUBAC FORTRESS - PROJECT DESIGN ALBO-inzenjering Beograd d.o.o. preduzece za projektovanje i inzenjering - Beograd European Union Project Implemented Project Design and Feasibility Study Funded Project by Golubac Municipality for Revitalization of Golubac Fortress Chief Designer: MARIJA JOVIN, graduate architectural engineer Consultants for concept of revitalization: DR MIOMIR KORAC, archaeologist SINISA TEMERINSKI, architectural engineer Designers: ALEKSANDRA BANOVIC, graduate architectural engineer, town-planning solution VESNA VANDIC, graduate lawyer, program, legal and economic aspect NENAD KIS, graduate civil engineer, constructive system BRANISLAV JOVIN, graduate architectural engineer, town-planning solution SAVO DJAKONOVIC, graduate civil engineer, tunnel construction SLAVKO DJERFI, graduate civil engineer, transport solution Revitalization of Golubac Fortress NIKOLA CICA, graduate electrical engineer, lighting and electrical installations ILIJA MIHAJLOVIC, graduate mechanical engineer, thermo-technical installations BORIS HOROSAVIN, graduate art historian, computer visualization Project Design Belgrade 2009. Revitalization of the Golubac Fortress Contents Introduction 1 Transport structure 11 Legal basis and jurisdictions 1 Electrical system 15 Acts on Protection 1 Protection from atmospheric discharges 19 Macro location and geographical position of the Golubac fortress 1 Thermo-technical installations 19 Physical characteristics of
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Viking Age Fortresses with Automatic Landscape Classification and Feature Detection
    remote sensing Article Searching for Viking Age Fortresses with Automatic Landscape Classification and Feature Detection David Stott 1,2, Søren Munch Kristiansen 2,3,* and Søren Michael Sindbæk 3 1 Department of Archaeological Science and Conservation, Moesgaard Museum, Moesgård Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark 2 Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 3 Center for Urban Network Evolutions (UrbNet), Aarhus University, Moesgård Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +45-2338-2424 Received: 19 June 2019; Accepted: 25 July 2019; Published: 12 August 2019 Abstract: Across the world, cultural heritage is eradicated at an unprecedented rate by development, agriculture, and natural erosion. Remote sensing using airborne and satellite sensors is an essential tool for rapidly investigating human traces over large surfaces of our planet, but even large monumental structures may be visible as only faint indications on the surface. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of a machine learning approach using airborne laser scanning data to address a “needle-in-a-haystack” problem, which involves the search for remnants of Viking ring fortresses throughout Denmark. First ring detection was applied using the Hough circle transformations and template matching, which detected 202,048 circular features in Denmark. This was reduced to 199 candidate sites by using their geometric properties and the application of machine learning techniques to classify the cultural and topographic context of the features. Two of these near perfectly circular features are convincing candidates for Viking Age fortresses, and two are candidates for either glacial landscape features or simple meteor craters.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Structure and Function
    Vocabulary Castle Structure and Function Name: Date: Castle Use A Castle’s Structure: · Large and of great defensive strength · Surrounded by a wall with a fighting platform · Usually has a large, strong tower A Castle’s Function: · Fortress and military protection · Center of local government · Home of the owner, usually a king The Parts of a Castle allure: the walkway at the top of a castle wall. The allure was often shielded by a protective wall so that guards could move between towers; also called a wall-walk arcading: a series of columns and arches, built in an upside-down U shape arrow loop: a tiny vertical opening in the castle wall; a thin window used for shooting arrows at the enemy; also called a loophole or meurtriere ashlar: blocks of stone, used to build castle wa lls and towers bailey: an open, grassy area inside the walls of the castle containing farm pastures, cottages, and other buildings. Sometimes a castle had more than one bailey; also called a ward. balustrade: railing along a path or stairway barrel vault: semicircular roof made out of wood or stone bastion: a small tower on a courtyard wall or an outside wall battlement: a narrow wall built along the outer edge of the wall-walk to protect soldiers against attack boss: the middle stone in an arch; also called a keystone concentric: having two sets of walls, one inside the other cornerstone: a stone at the corner of a building uniting two intersecting walls, sometimes inscribed with the year the building was constructed; also called a quoin crosswall: a wall inside a large tower Lesson Connection: Castles and Cornerstones Copyright The Kennedy Center.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Middle Bronze Age Fortifications
    3. MIDDLE BRONZE AGE FORTIFICATIONS Let him who desires peace, prepare for war. Vegetius Renatus, Epitome Book 3, Preface ANY of the main elements of Middle Bronze fosse) does not serve as an adequate criterion for the MAge defenses in the Levant, such as earthen establishment of a site typology since this may erro­ ramparts (Pennells 1983 ), gates (Gregori 1986; neously imply that these features were continuous Herzog 1986; G. R. H. Wright 1984), and fosses around the site. Special attention is paid, instead, to (Oredsson 2000), have been well documented and the existence of such features in identifiable recurring studied over the last several decades. Various surveys combinations at multiple settlements, which are of Middle Bronze Age fortifications have comple­ likely to suggest a concerted defensive strategy. mented these reports (G. R. H. Wright 1985a; Prior to attempting to create a site typology like Kempinski 1992c; Fritz 1995:27ff.). Yet no single the one mentioned above it is necessary to establish a work provides a comprehensive description of the typology of Middle Bronze Age defensive elements features, functions, and nature of the construction of that accounts for the historical development of each Middle Bronze Age fortifications and how these as­ feature and its regional distribution. In the following pects related to the concerns of Bronze Age warfare. discussion of earthen ramparts, for example, it is as­ In the absence of such a treatment many basic ques­ sumed therefore that a single rampart constitutes a tions remain. For example, which elements are ubiq­ continuous built feature of uniform dimensions (i.e., uitous to fortifications during the Middle Bronze height, width, and slope) running between gates.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford's Northern Defences: Archaeological Studies 1971- 1982
    Oxford's Northern Defences: Archaeological Studies 1971- 1982 By BRIAN DURHAM, CLA IRE HALPIN and NICHOLAS PALMER SUMMARY Fi ve small projects on Oxford's north defensive Line show how the vulnerable side of the town was secured Jrom its Late Saxon Joundation until tM Civil War. The north defence oj the Late Saxon bllrh is confinned, and the western line is strongly indicated. A diversion of the defensive line around the North Gate church seems to predale Ihe mainJree-slanding slone walls oJlhe 131h cenlury. New daling evidence is JurnishedJor Ihe ouler wall east oJSmilhgale, and Ihe exislence oJbaslions in il is confirmed. The medieval defences are shown to have been extensivery refurbished in the Civil War. INTRODUCTION he excavations embodied in this report represent archaeological opportunities T provided by normal commercial and University developments which shed light on various aspects of Oxford's northern defences. The initiative for the studies came in most cases from Tom Hassall, director successively of the Oxford Archaeological Excavation Committee and of the Oxfordshire Archaeological Unit, and the writers are duly grateful to him. The first archaeological excavation of the northern defences was carried out in 1899 when a c.12m. length of the city wall in the Clarendon Quadrangle was exposed.' Part of this stretch was again revealed in 1938 when the Old and New Bodleian Libraries were linked by a tunnel, giving the first and only complete section through the medieval defence.2 In the late 19405 there was renewed interest, with the University Archaeological Society searching for a continuation of the Late Saxon defences on the Canal Wharf site before the building ofNuffield College, and A.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortification of the Medieval Fort Isar – Shtip
    Trajče NACEV Fortification of the Medieval Fort Isar – Shtip UDK 94:623.1(497.731)”653” University “Goce Delcev” Stip [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: The medieval fort Isar, which was built on top of the ruins of the antique town of Astibo, is located on the hill with a North-South orientation in the central city core. The fortification had its largest increase during the 14th century and from this period we have the best preserved architectonic remains of the fortification. The entire fort is surrounded by fortification walls, with the main entrance in their eastern portion. The suburbs are located on the eastern and southern slopes of the Isar hill. At the highest part (the acropolis) there was another, smaller fortification, probably a feudal residence with a remarkable main tower (Donjon). The article reviews the fortification in the context of the results from the 2001 – 2002 and 2008 – 2010 excavation campaigns. During the first campaign, one of the most significant discoveries was the second tower, a counterpart to the main Donjon tower, and the entrance to the main part of the acropolis positioned between them. With the second 2008 – 2010 campaign, the entire eastern fortification wall of the Isar fort was uncovered. Key words: fortification, fort, curtain wall, tower. The medieval fort Isar (Fig. 1) (Pl. 1) that sprouted on the ruins of the ancient city Astibo, is located on a dominant hill between the Bregalnica river from the north and west and Otinja from the south and east, in the downtown core, in the north –south direction.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The version of the following full text has not yet been defined or was untraceable and may differ from the publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/26435 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-06 and may be subject to change. ROMEINSE TROEPEN IN NIJMEGEN DOOR J.K. HAALEBOS De militaire geschiedenis van Nijmegen in de eerste twee eeuwen na Chr. is gecom­ pliceerd. De functie en de sterkte van de daar gelegerde troepen hebben gewisseld. In de midden-Augusteïsche tijd speelde de Hunerberg een rol in het offensief van Drusus (12-9 voor Chr.). Later zijn op het Kops Plateau en bij het Trajanusplein kleinere garnizoenen gelegerd die slechts beperkte taken kunnen hebben vervuld. Na de opstand der Bataven werd weer een legioen op de Hunerberg gestationeerd ter bewaking van de opnieuw onder Romeins gezag gebrachte bewoners van het Neder-Rijn-gebied. Het terrein bleef tot in de tweede helft van de 2e eeuw door kleinere afdelingen Romeinse troepen bezet. Sinds de stimulerende in 1967 verschenen studie van J.E. Bogaers over dit onderwerp is de samenstelling van de Nijmeegse garnizoenen niet meer uitvoerig besproken.1 Nieuwe epigrafische gegevens, gewijzigde inzichten in de structuur en het functioneren van het Romeinse leger en de toegenoinen kennis van de archeo­ logische overblijfselen maken een nieuw overzicht van de in Nijmegen gelegerde troepen gewenst. De voor-Flavische troepen Inleiding Onze kennis over de troepen die in de Julisch-Claudische tijd in Nijmegen gelegerd zijn geweest, is beperkt.
    [Show full text]
  • Windsor Castle Site Visit Workbook
    Windsor Castle School ……………………………………………………. Answer Booklet In the Footsteps of Medieval Kings Site Visit Workbook You will need: • Weather appropriate clothing • Sensible shoes • Site visit workbook • Pen and pencil • Packed lunch • Water Security at Windsor Castle Windsor Castle is a working royal palace • On arrival, you and your belongings will be subject to airport-style security checks. Please try to bring as little as possible with you as it will help you to get through security screening more quickly. • Eating and drinking are not permitted in the State Apartments or St George’s Chapel. You will be asked to place drinks and food in closed bags before being admitted to the Castle. • Photography and filming are not permitted inside the State Apartments, the Semi-State Rooms or St George's Chapel. • Large backpacks are not permitted in the State Apartments and must be checked in. What do you know about Windsor Castle and its use today? Windsor Castle is: • oldest and largest inhabited castle in the world. • one of the Queen’s Official Residences, which include Buckingham Palace, in London and The Palace of Holyroodhouse, in Edinburgh. • home to over 40 British Kings and Queens in its 900 year history • never been allowed to fall into disrepair or become a ruin. Windsor Castle was built in about 1080, for William the Conqueror. Why did William build castles to live in? William was a French Nobleman, Duke of Normandy, promised the crown of England by the King at the time Edward I, but when the King died he named his successor as Harold.
    [Show full text]