Searching for Viking Age Fortresses with Automatic Landscape Classification and Feature Detection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Searching for Viking Age Fortresses with Automatic Landscape Classification and Feature Detection remote sensing Article Searching for Viking Age Fortresses with Automatic Landscape Classification and Feature Detection David Stott 1,2, Søren Munch Kristiansen 2,3,* and Søren Michael Sindbæk 3 1 Department of Archaeological Science and Conservation, Moesgaard Museum, Moesgård Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark 2 Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Høegh-Guldbergs Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 3 Center for Urban Network Evolutions (UrbNet), Aarhus University, Moesgård Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +45-2338-2424 Received: 19 June 2019; Accepted: 25 July 2019; Published: 12 August 2019 Abstract: Across the world, cultural heritage is eradicated at an unprecedented rate by development, agriculture, and natural erosion. Remote sensing using airborne and satellite sensors is an essential tool for rapidly investigating human traces over large surfaces of our planet, but even large monumental structures may be visible as only faint indications on the surface. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of a machine learning approach using airborne laser scanning data to address a “needle-in-a-haystack” problem, which involves the search for remnants of Viking ring fortresses throughout Denmark. First ring detection was applied using the Hough circle transformations and template matching, which detected 202,048 circular features in Denmark. This was reduced to 199 candidate sites by using their geometric properties and the application of machine learning techniques to classify the cultural and topographic context of the features. Two of these near perfectly circular features are convincing candidates for Viking Age fortresses, and two are candidates for either glacial landscape features or simple meteor craters. Ground-truthing revealed the latter sites as ice age features, while the cultural heritage sites Borgø and Trælbanke urge renewed archaeological investigation in the light of our findings. The fact that machine learning identifies compelling new candidate sites for ring fortresses demonstrates the power of the approach. Our automatic approach is applicable worldwide where digital terrain models are available to search for cultural heritage sites, geomorphological features, and meteor impact craters. Keywords: airborne laser scanning (ALS); lidar; archaeology; machine learning; feature detection 1. Introduction Finding rare natural or cultural features on the surface of our densely vegetated and fast eroding planet is an urgent challenge. Recently, improvements in sensors, data processing, and visualization have transformed the scope of archaeological discovery and investigation. Successful, recent examples include the use of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data to detect structures at Rome’s ancient harbor [1] or to map the jungle-covered settlement landscape of Cambodia’s Angkor Wat complex [2] and the multi-period city of Jerash, Jordan [3]. In a similar manner, meteor impact craters are detected in Google Earth images [4], or in airborne radar soundings of the Greenland Ice-sheet [5]. Not all archaeological monuments are easily detected. Recently, ALS survey data led to the discovery of a previously unknown Viking Age (10th Century CE) ring fortresses, Borgring, near Copenhagen, Denmark [6]. These rare sites comprise circular turf and timber ramparts 10–18 m broad and up to 5 m high, which enclosed an area of 120 to 250 m in diameter, with a geometrically arranged system of streets and houses in the interior (Figure1). Borgring was overlooked because a Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1881; doi:10.3390/rs11161881 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Remote Sens. 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 21 Remoteoverlooked Sens. 2019, 11 because, 1881 a millennium of erosion and truncation by the cultivation mean that only2 of 20subtle remains of the rampart are visible on the surface today as an interrupted bank 0.15 m high. millenniumThe of ring erosion fortresses and truncation are believed by theto form cultivation a networ meank of thatroyal only strongholds subtle remains marking of thea budding rampart state are visibleformation on the during surface the today reign asof anKing interrupted Harald Bluetooth bank 0.15 c. m 958 high. to 986 CE [7]. The regular spacing of the fiveThe known ring fortresses examples are suggest believed that to further form a networkunrecogniz of royaled fortresses strongholds forming marking part of a buddingthis network state may formationhave existed. during Evidence the reign offrom King excavations Harald Bluetooth at Fyrkat c. and 958 Borgring to 986 CE also [7]. suggest The regular that the spacing construction of the of five knownthese fortresses examples may suggest not have that furtherbeen completed unrecognized at th fortressese time of formingtheir abandonment part of this network[8,9]. Thus, may being haveable existed. to confirm Evidence or from refute excavations the existence at Fyrkat of andfurther Borgring examples also suggest is of thatgreat the importance construction for of our theseunderstanding fortresses may of not the have politics been of completed the era. However, at the time to of date, their there abandonment has not been [8,9 a]. systematic Thus, being attempt able to to confirmdiscover or them. refute the existence of further examples is of great importance for our understanding of the politicsLimited of the era.resources However, prohibit to date, manually there has interpreti not beenng a systematic the ALS attemptdata on to a discover national them. scale. We addressedLimited resources this using prohibit an automatic manually feature interpreting detection the workflow ALS data onto look a national for unrecognized scale. We addressed ring fortress 2 this usingin ALS an data automatic covering feature 42,036 detection km of workflow present-day to look Denmark for unrecognized (the whole ring landmass fortress inof ALS the datacountry coveringexcluding 42,036 the km island2 of present-day of Bornholm). Denmark (the whole landmass of the country excluding the island of Bornholm).This presents a difficult problem for feature detection approaches of remote sensing, where a largeThis presentsnumber of a diexamplesfficult problem are usuall fory featureused to detectiontrain classifiers approaches [10–15]. of In remote this case, sensing, these wheremethods a are largeinappropriate, number of examples as Borgring are usually is the only used example to train classifiersof an erosion [10– 15damaged]. In this fortress case, these that methodshas not been are inappropriate,extensively reconstructed as Borgring in is the the recent only example past [16]. of Additionally, an erosion damaged unidentified fortress Trelleborg-type that has not fortresses been extensivelyare unlikely reconstructed to be complete, in the recent as they past may [16 be]. Additionally,truncated by unidentifiedlater development Trelleborg-type and erosion fortresses processes. are unlikelyThus, the to methods be complete, used asin this they research may be must truncated be ca bypable later of developmentdetecting partial and or erosion fragmented processes. features, Thus,which the methods are sensitive used into this features research with must poorly be capable defined of ramparts, detecting partialand not or reliant fragmented on large features, training whichdatasets. are sensitive to features with poorly defined ramparts, and not reliant on large training datasets. To addressTo address this, wethis, used we computer used computer vision methods vision tomethods detect 202,048to detect annular 202,048 topographic annular topographic features in thefeatures ALS data, in the which ALS were data, then which refined were by then training refined a Random by training Forests a Random Classifier Fo onrests the Classifier topographic on the and historicaltopographic context and historical of the known context examples of the (seeknown Figure exam2).ples The classified(see Figure results 2). The were classified further results refined were usingfurther the geometric refined using properties the geometric of the features properties to 199 of candidates. the features We to suggest 199 candidates. that two ofWe the suggest candidates that two shouldof the be furthercandidates investigated should be as further potential investigated ring fortresses as potential of this period.ring fortresses of this period. FigureFigure 1. Confirmed 1. Confirmed and newand new candidates candidates for Viking for Viking Age militaryAge military installations installations and ringand fortressesring fortresses on on the mapthe map of Denmark of Denmark and adjacentand adjacent areas areas of present-day of present-day Germany Germany and Swedenand Sweden showing showing estimates estimates of of relativerelative late Viking late Viking Age humanAge human (10th ( Century10th Century CE) populationCE) population density densit [17],y [17], the confirmed the confirmed Viking Viking Age Age ring fortressesring fortresses (blue-black (blue-black circles), circles) contemporary, contemporary fortified fortified cities, and cities, the royal and centerthe royal in UNESCO center in World UNESCO HeritageWorld site Heritage Jelling (open site Jelling blue) [(open6], the blue) fully developed[6], the fully linear developed defensive linear earthwork defensive across earthwork the southern across the frontier,southern the UNESCO frontier, Worldthe UNESCO Heritage World site Dannevirke, Heritage site and Dannevirke, the two new and candidate the two sites,new candidate Trælbanke sites, and BorgøTrælbanke
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Annu Al Repor T
    2019 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL Copyright c 2020 LBG GmbH; LBI ArchPro PUBLISHED BY LBI ARCHPRO EDITORS:IMMO TRINKS,CHRISTINA EINWÖGERER,WOLFGANG NEUBAUER July 2020 3 General Information Contact Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft GmbH Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology Hohe Warte 38, A-1190 Vienna, Austria offi[email protected] http://archpro.lbg.ac.at LBI ArchPro Partner Organisations The LBI ArchPro is based on a European partnership formed by: LBG: Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft (A) NoeL: Federal State of Lower Austria, Abt. Kultur und Wissenschaft (A) Uni Vienna: University of Vienna (A) – Vienna Institute for Archaeological Science (VIAS) and Institute for Prehistory and Historical Archaeology (UHA) TU Wien: Technische Universität Wien – Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Institute of Visual Computing & Human-Centered Technology (A) ZAMG: Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Dept. for Applied Geophysics (A) 7reasons: 7reasons Medien GmbH (A) ABT: Airborne Technologies (A) NIKU: Norsk Institut for Kulturminneforskning – The Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage – Digital Archaeology Department (N) Vfk: Vestfold fylkeskommune, Kulturarv (N) LWL: Landesverband Westfalen-Lippe – The federal state archaeology of Westphalia-Lippe (D) RGZM: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum Mainz (D) LBI ArchPro Board LBG: Jürgen Busch NoeL: Franz Humer, Eduard Pollhammer Uni Vienna: Gerhard Trnka, Timothy Taylor TU Wien: Norbert Pfeifer, Michael Wimmer ZAMG: Ingrid Schlögel, Gerhard Wotawa 7reasons: Michael Klein, Günther Weinlinger ABT: Wolfgang Grumeth, Benjamin Kabelik RGZM: Alexandra Busch, Detlef Gronenborn NIKU: Knut Paasche, Kristin Bakken Vfk: Terje Gansum, Ane Ingvild Støen LWL: Michael Rind, Joris Coolen LBI ArchPro Scientific Advisory Board Maria Theresa Norn (chair), DEA Kopenhagen & Aarhus University, Denmark Anitra Fossum, Municipality of Sande, Vestfold County, Norway Patrick Ryan Williams, Field Museum of Natural History & Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Cereal Remains from Archaeological Sites 2Nd Edition 2006
    Identification of cereal remains from archaeological sites 2nd edition 2006 Spikelet fork of the “new glume wheat” (Jones et al. 2000) Stefanie JACOMET and collaborators Archaeobotany Lab IPAS, Basel University English translation partly by James Greig CEREALS: CEREALIA Fam. Poaceae /Gramineae (Grasses) Systematics and Taxonomy All cereal species belong botanically (taxonomically) to the large family of the Gramineae (Poaceae). This is one of the largest Angiosperm families with >10 000 different species. In the following the systematics for some of the most imporant taxa is shown: class: Monocotyledoneae order: Poales familiy: Poaceae (= Gramineae) (Süssgräser) subfamily: Pooideae Tribus: Triticeae Subtribus: Triticinae genera: Triticum (Weizen, wheat); Aegilops ; Hordeum (Gerste; barley); Elymus; Hordelymus; Agropyron; Secale (Roggen, rye) Note : Avena and the millets belong to other Tribus. The identification of prehistoric cereal remains assumes understanding of different subject areas in botany. These are mainly morphology and anatomy, but also phylogeny and evolution (and today, also genetics). Since most of the cereal species are treated as domesticated plants, many different forms such as subspecies, varieties, and forms appear inside the genus and species (see table below). In domesticates the taxonomical category of variety is also called “sort” (lat. cultivar, abbreviated: cv.). This refers to a variety which evolved through breeding. Cultivar is the lowest taxonomic rank in the domesticated plants. Occasionally, cultivars are also called races: e.g. landraces evolved through genetic isolation, under local environmental conditions whereas „high-breed-races“ were breed by strong selection of humans. Anyhow: The morphological delimitation of cultivars is difficult, sometimes even impossible. It needs great experience and very detailed morphological knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northgate Reconstruction
    131 7 THE NORTHGATE RECONSTRUCTION P Holder and J Walker INTRODUCTION have come from the supposedly ancient quarries at Collyhurst some few kilometres north-east of the The Unit was asked to provide advice and fort. As this source was not available, Hollington assistance to Manchester City Council so that the Red Sandstone from Staffordshire was used to form City could reconstruct the Roman fort wall and a wall of coursed facing blocks 200-320 mm long by defences at Manchester as they would have appeared 140-250 mm deep by 100-120 mm thick. York stone around the beginning of the 3rd century (Phase 4). was used for paving, steps and copings. A recipe for the right type of mortar, which consisted of This short report has been included in the volume three parts river sand, three parts building sand, in order that a record of the archaeological work two parts lime and one part white cement, was should be available for visitors to the site. obtained from Hampshire County Council. The Ditches and Roods The Wall and Rampart The Phase 4a (see Chapter 4, Area B) ditches were Only the foundations and part of the first course re-establised along their original line to form a of the wall survived (see Chapter 4, Phase 4, Area defensive circuit consisting of an outer V-shaped A). The underlying foundations consisted of ditch in front of a smaller inner ditch running interleaved layers of rammed clay and river close to the fort wall. cobble. On top of the foundations of the fort wall lay traces of a chamfered plinth (see Chapter 5g) There were three original roads; the main road made up of large red sandstone blocks, behind from the Northgate that ran up to Deansgate, the which was a rough rubble backing.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Phase 4D Late Medieval and Renaissance Fortification 1350–1600 AD
    Metro Cityring – Kongens Nytorv KBM 3829, Excavation Report 16 Phase 4d Late medieval and Renaissance fortification 1350–1600 AD 16.1 Results The presentation of the remains from Phase 4d will be given from two perspectives. Firstly there will be an account of the different feature types – part of a bulwark and the Late medieval moat (Fig. 140 and Tab. 37). After the overall description the features are placed in a structural and historical context. This time phase could have been presented together with either the eastern gate building and/or the Late medieval city wall, but is separated in the report due to the results and dates, interpretations and the general discussion on the changes that have been made on the overall fortification over time. This also goes for the backfilling and levelling of the Late medieval moat which actually should be placed under time Phase 6 (Post medieval fortification and other early 17th century activities), but are presented here due to the difficulties in distinguishing some of these deposits from the usage layers and the fact that these layers are necessary for the discussion about the moat’s final destruction, etc. Museum of Copenhagen 2017 248 Metro Cityring – Kongens Nytorv KBM 3829, Excavation Report Fig. 140. Overview of Late medieval features at Kongens Nytorv. Group Type of feature Subarea Basic interpretation 502976 Timber/planks Trench ZT162033 Bulwark 503806 Cut and fills Station Box Ditch? 450 Construction cut, sedimentation and Several phases Moat, 16th century backfills 560 Dump and levelling layers Phase 5B-2 Moat, 16th century 500913 Timber Phase 5A-1 Wooden plank Tab.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonnebakken-En Skibsborg Fra 980
    Fynske Årbøger 1988 Nonnebakken-en skibsborg fra 980 Vikingeborgens rolle i Danmarkshistorien Af Poul Skaaning Den rette tolkning afTrelleborg, Aggersborg, Nonnebakken og Fyrkat har voldt store stridigheder, hvor både fagfolk og lægmænd har givet deres besyv med. Trelieborgs udgraver Poul Nørlund har fremsat den teori, som til dato harvundet størst tilslutning. Han mente, at borgene måtte ses i sammenhæng med danskernes erobring af England i 1013. Ifølge teorien var de altså bygget på befaling af Sven Tveskæg som en art træningslejre eller kaserner, hvor mandskabet uddannedes til krigstogterne hinsides Nordsøen. Den anden hovedteori fremkom o. 1970. Aksel E. Christensen og Tage E. Christiansen mente, at borgene var bygget af Harald Blåtand som tvangsborge mod det danske folk. Ifølge J elling-stenen vandt Ha­ rald sig al Danmark, og teoriens fortalere mente, at erobringen nød­ vendiggjorde en militærbesættelse. Der kan rettes mange indvendinger imod både træningslejr- og tvangsborgteorien. Bl.a. passer ingen af dem særlig godt til den den­ drokronologiske datering af borgene til 980. Dette årstal danner ud­ gangspunkt for følgende artikel. Den her opstillede teori kan man kalde skibsborgteorien. Den går ud på, at borgene blev bygget for at beskytte ledingsflådens langskibe efter Svens oprør mod sin fader kong Harald. Det er givet, at borgene kom til verden som følge af en politisk be­ slutning. Enten var det kong Harald eller også hans søn Sven Tve­ skæg, som besluttede at bygge borgene i sommeren 980. Kun de to havde tilstrækkelig politisk og militær magt til at træffe en så vidtræk• kende beslutning. I sommeren 980 byggede henved l 000 mand fra ledingshæren for­ uden et ukendt antal civilister borg ved Odense Å.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Castles
    Gloucestershire Archives Take One Castle Gloucestershire Castles The first castles in Gloucestershire were built soon after the Norman invasion of 1066. After the Battle of Hastings, the Normans had an urgent need to consolidate the land they had conquered and at the same time provide a secure political and military base to control the country. Castles were an ideal way to do this as not only did they secure newly won lands in military terms (acting as bases for troops and supply bases), they also served as a visible reminder to the local population of the ever-present power and threat of force of their new overlords. Early castles were usually one of three types; a ringwork, a motte or a motte & bailey; A Ringwork was a simple oval or circular earthwork formed of a ditch and bank. A motte was an artificially raised earthwork (made by piling up turf and soil) with a flat top on which was built a wooden tower or ‘keep’ and a protective palisade. A motte & bailey was a combination of a motte with a bailey or walled enclosure that usually but not always enclosed the motte. The keep was the strongest and securest part of a castle and was usually the main place of residence of the lord of the castle, although this changed over time. The name has a complex origin and stems from the Middle English term ‘kype’, meaning basket or cask, after the structure of the early keeps (which resembled tubes). The name ‘keep’ was only used from the 1500s onwards and the contemporary medieval term was ‘donjon’ (an apparent French corruption of the Latin dominarium) although turris, turris castri or magna turris (tower, castle tower and great tower respectively) were also used.
    [Show full text]
  • A Possible Ring Fort from the Late Viking Period in Helsingborg
    A POSSIBLE RING FORT FROM THE LATE VIKING PERIOD IN HELSINGBORG Margareta This paper is based on the author's earlier archaeologi- cal excavations at St Clemens Church in Helsingborg en-Hallerdt Weidhag as well as an investigation in rg87 immediately to the north of the church. On this occasion part of a ditch from a supposed medieval ring fort, estimated to be about a7o m in diameter, was unexpectedly found. This discovery once again raised the question as to whether an early ring fort had existed here, as suggested by the place name. The probability of such is strengthened by the newly discovered ring forts in south-western Scania: Borgeby and Trelleborg. In terms of time these have been ranked with four circular fortresses in Denmark found much earlier, the dendrochronological dating of which is y8o/g8r. The discoveries of the Scanian ring forts have thrown new light on south Scandinavian history during the period AD yLgo —zogo. This paper can thus be regarded as a contribution to the debate. Key words: Viking Age, Trelleborg-type fortress, ri»g forts, Helsingborg, Scania, Denmark INTRODUCTION Helsingborg's location on the strait of Öresund (the Sound) and its special topography have undoubtedly been of decisive importance for the establishment of the town and its further development. Opinions as to the meaning of the place name have long been divided, but now the military aspect of the last element of the name has gained the up- per. hand. Nothing in the find material indicates that the town owed its growth to crafts, market or trade activity.
    [Show full text]
  • And New to Denmark? Lolland Municipality Has a Lot to Offer Foto: Jens Larsen - Nakskov Fotogruppe Welcome to Lolland
    International – and new to Denmark? Lolland Municipality has a lot to offer Foto: Jens Larsen - Nakskov Fotogruppe Welcome to Lolland Are you an international working on, or going to work on, the Femern-connection? Are you in doubt what Lolland can offer you and your family? We are here to help you. Whether it is information or guidance regarding the many opportunities that exist in the area, our team of local experts can assist in terms of job opportunities, housing options, language schools, leisure activities, getting in touch with relevant public entities, building a network and more. We know that it is difficult moving to a new area and even a new country. We will work with you to help remove any language and cultural barriers so that you get the information you and your family need and get answers to questions about education, healthcare, employment and the like. In this publication you will find basic practical information. Please take a look at the different websites this folder provides you with and feel free to contact our interna- tional consultant for more detailed inquiries: Julia Böhmer Tel. +45 51 79 12 93 [email protected] 2 – International and new to Denmark Lolland International School Måske et stort kort? Eller to små? F.eks. et der viser, hvor Lolland ligger i det store perspektiv og et, der viser de små byer på Lolland, den internationale skole eller lignende. International and new to Denmark – 3 Everything you need Lolland is an attractive area to settle into, whether you are moving here alone or together with your family.
    [Show full text]
  • Morsum 1.4.Pub
    Vielen Dank für Ihr Interesse an der Ferienwohnung Sylter Rabe! ANREISE NACH SYLT Die Ferienwohnung Sylter Rabe liegt im Ort Morsum auf der Insel Sylt. Sylt ist die wohl bekannteste deutsche Ferieninsel und in der Nordsee gelegen. Für die Anreise stehen die Bahn (Personen– und Autozug), die Fähren, oder das Flugzeug zur Verfügung. Das dabei am häufigsten genutzte Verkehrsmittel, ist zweifelsfrei die Bahn (Autozug für PKW Hin- und Rückfahrt ab Niebüll derzeit 92,00€ / stand Frühjahr 2016). Der größte Andrang am Autozug (Verladung erfolgt im Ort Niebüll) ist samstags, da der Samstag der klassische Wechseltag auf der Insel im Bereich der Ferienunterkünfte ist. Das bedeutet, dass die meisten Mieter bis 10.00 Uhr Ihre Unterkünfte räumen müssen und sich je Autozug nach Westerland nach Wetterlage aufmachen, die Insel zu verlas- sen. Bei schlechtem Wetter wollen alle gleich weg, bei gutem Wetter verbringt man den Tag noch auf der Insel. Diese Umstände gilt es zu berücksichti- gen, wenn man Wartezeiten am Zug vermeiden möchte. Auch wenn sich die Bahn auf Spitzenzei- ten in Verbindung mit Ferien- und Feiertagen einstellt, kann es durchaus vorkommen, dass man nicht mehr auf den geplanten Zug kommt, da be- reits einige andere Fahrzeuge in den vielen War- tespuren stehen. Dann kommt es zu Wartezeiten von 30 Min. oder länger — die Abfahrt- zeiten können online unter www.sylt-shuttle.de ebenso abgefragt werden, wie die aktuelle Lage an der Autoverladung. Seit 2016 fährt auch die RDC Deutschland einige Zeiten. Bei der Anreise können Sie an einem der vielen DRIVE-IN Schaltern in Niebüll u.a. be- quem mit EC Karte zahlen und das Rückfahrtticket gleich mitbuchen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antonine Wall, the Roman Frontier in Scotland, Was the Most and Northerly Frontier of the Roman Empire for a Generation from AD 142
    Breeze The Antonine Wall, the Roman frontier in Scotland, was the most and northerly frontier of the Roman Empire for a generation from AD 142. Hanson It is a World Heritage Site and Scotland’s largest ancient monument. The Antonine Wall Today, it cuts across the densely populated central belt between Forth (eds) and Clyde. In The Antonine Wall: Papers in Honour of Professor Lawrence Keppie, Papers in honour of nearly 40 archaeologists, historians and heritage managers present their researches on the Antonine Wall in recognition of the work Professor Lawrence Keppie of Lawrence Keppie, formerly Professor of Roman History and Wall Antonine The Archaeology at the Hunterian Museum, Glasgow University, who spent edited by much of his academic career recording and studying the Wall. The 32 papers cover a wide variety of aspects, embracing the environmental and prehistoric background to the Wall, its structure, planning and David J. Breeze and William S. Hanson construction, military deployment on its line, associated artefacts and inscriptions, the logistics of its supply, as well as new insights into the study of its history. Due attention is paid to the people of the Wall, not just the ofcers and soldiers, but their womenfolk and children. Important aspects of the book are new developments in the recording, interpretation and presentation of the Antonine Wall to today’s visitors. Considerable use is also made of modern scientifc techniques, from pollen, soil and spectrographic analysis to geophysical survey and airborne laser scanning. In short, the papers embody present- day cutting edge research on, and summarise the most up-to-date understanding of, Rome’s shortest-lived frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Castle
    The Language of Autbority: The Expression of Status in the Scottish Medieval Castle M. Justin McGrail Deparment of Art History McGilI University Montréal March 1995 "A rhesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fu[filment of the requirements of the degree of Masters of Am" O M. Justin McGrail. 1995 National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*u of Canada du Canada Aquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie SeMces seMces bibliographiques 395 Wellingîon Street 395, nie Wellingtm ûîtawaON K1AON4 OitawaON K1AON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une Licence non exclusive Licence dowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distniuer ou copies of this thesis in microfonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous papet or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels rnay be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. H. J. B6ker for his perserverance and guidance in the preparation and completion of this thesis. I would also like to recognise the tremendous support given by my family and friends over the course of this degree.
    [Show full text]
  • “Moat” Strategy in Real Estate Warren Buffett Buys Investments with “Economic Moats” in Order to Earn Safer, Higher Returns
    HOW TO INVEST IN REAL HOW I LEARNED TO STOP I HAVE EVERY DOLLAR I’VE WHY COMPOUND ARE YOU MISSING ESTATE WITHOUT OWNING STOCK PICKING AND LOVE EARNED IN MY 10 YEAR INTEREST ISN’T AS OPPORTUNITIES TO SAVE REAL ESTATE INDEX FUNDS CAREER POWERFUL AS YOU THINK $100,000+ IN ORDER TO (http://www.investmentzen(h.ctotpm://bwlwogw/.hinovwe-stmentzen(h.ctotpm://bwlwogw/.hinovwe-stmentzen(h.ctotpm://bwlwogw/.ii-nvestmentzenS.cAoVmE P/bENloNgIE/wS?hy- HOME (HTTP://WWW.INVESTMENTZEN.COM/BLOG/) » REAL ESTATE INVESTING (HTTP://WWW.INVESTMENTZEN.COM/BLOG/TOPICS/REAL-ESTATE/) JUNE 26, 2017 How To Use Warren Buffett’s “Moat” Strategy In Real Estate Warren Buffett buys investments with “economic moats” in order to earn safer, higher returns. You can use the same concept to buy protable real estate investments. Here’s how. j Sh3a1re s Tw3e2et b Pin1 a Reddit q Stumble B Pocketz Bu2ff2er h +1 2 k Email o 88 SHARES (https://www.(rhetdtpd:it//.wcowmw/.ssutubmbitl?euurpl=ohnt.tcpo:m//w/swuwb.minivt?eusrtml=hentttpz:e//nw.cwowm.i/nbvloegs/thmoewn-ttzoe-nu.sceo-mwa/brlroegn/-hbouwff-ettots-u-mseo-awta-srrtreant-ebguyf-fetts-moat- RELATED POSTS HOW TO INVEST IN REAL ESTATE WITHOUT OWNING REAL ESTATE (tiewornhoeswi-ta-tritnahlnep-tioavn:e/uelg-/-st)w--t-ww.(ihntvteps:/t/mwewnwtz.einnv.ceostmm/benlotgz/ehno.cwo-m/blog/how- to-invest-in-real-estate- CHAD CARSON without-owning-real- (HTTP://WWW.INVESTMENTZEN.COM/BLOG/AUTHOR/COACHCARSON/) estate/) Real estate investor, world traveler, husband & INVESTING IN REAL ESTATE VS STOCKS: PICKING A SIDE father of 2 (http://www.investmentzen.com/blog/real- (esminhtsovatttaecrpkst:et-/i-/tnvw-gsw-/)w.einstvaetset-mvse-nsttozcekn-.mcoamrk/belto- g/real- investing/) I’m a Warren Buffett nerd.
    [Show full text]