DOCSLIB.ORG

Hate Crime Statistics, 1999

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hate Crime Statistics, 1999 FOREWORD The diversity of its people makes the United States a unique nation. However, when crimes are committed because of our differences, the effects can reverberate beyond a single person or group into an entire community, city, or society as a whole. These crimes, committed because of a bias against race, religion, disability, ethnicity, or sexual orientation, are not limited to cities of a particular size or a region of the country, but occur in communities of all sizes throughout the country. In an attempt to determine the scope and nature of hate crime, the Uniform Crime Reporting Program collects statistics on these incidents. However, data in publications such as Hate Crime Statistics are only a numerical representation that cannot mea- sure the fear, pain, and suffering of victims. Law enforcement agencies play a major role in informing the entire criminal justice system, researchers, academics, and the general public of hate crimes. The hate crime data collection program began with a sample of 11 states in 1990 and has grown to cover more than 12,000 agencies in 48 states that submit data covering 85 percent of the country. Without input from these agencies, this publication would be ineffective. Contributing law enforcement agen- cies should be commended for their efforts, and all law enforcement agencies are encouraged to participate. The program is not aimed at placing the towns or cities of participating agencies under a microscope, but rather to collect information on hate crimes. For once a problem is identified and acknowledged, only then is it possible to study, understand, and combat it. The national Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program would like to hear from you. The staff at the national UCR Program are continuously striving to improve our publications. We would appreciate it if the primary user of this publication would complete the evaluation form at the end of this book and either mail it to us at the indicated address or fax it to 304-625-5394. Contents Introduction 1 Methodology 3 Section I—Hate Crime Statistics 5 Table 1—Number of Incidents, Offenses, Victims, and Known Offenders By Bias Motivation, 1999 7 Table 2—Location of Incidents By Bias Motivation, 1999 8 Table 3—Number of Offenses, Victims, and Known Offenders By Offense, 1999 9 Table 4—Number of Offenses by Bias Motivation and Offense Type, 1999 10 Table 5—Number of Offenses by Bias Motivation and Association to Known Offender’s Race, 1999 12 Table 6—Number of Offenses by Offense Type and Known Offender’s Race, 1999 13 Table 7—Percent Distribution of Offenses by Victim Type, 1999 13 Table 8—Number of Offenses by State, 1999 14 Table 9—Number of Victims by Bias Motivation and Offense Type, 1999 16 Table 10—Percent Distribution of Incidents by Bias Motivation and Victim Type, 1999 18 Table 11—Number of Known Offenders by Race, 1999 18 Section II—Jurisdictional Hate Crime Statistics 19 Table 12—Number of Agencies Reporting Hate Crime Incidents by State, 1999 20 Table 13—Number of Hate Crime Incidents by Bias Motivation and State and Agency Type, 1999 21 Table 14—Agencies Submitting Zero Hate Crime Incidents by State and Agency Type, 1999 46 Appendix—Directory of State Uniform Crime Reporting Programs 118 iii INTRODUCTION Background of a hate crime, the nature of the offense, and the With the passage of the Hate Crime Statistics number and types of the victim(s) and offender(s). Act of 1990, Congress mandated the collection of While identifying the criteria that distinguish hate information about crimes motivated by a bias against a crimes from other offenses, the parties involved in the person’s race, religion, sexual orientation, and/or developmental phase of the Hate Crime Data Collec- ethnicity/national origin. Commissioned by the Attor- tion Program recognized that hate crimes are not ney General and aided by several local and state law separate, distinct crimes; instead, they are traditional enforcement agencies already investigating and collect- offenses motivated by the offender’s bias. An of- ing information about hate crimes, the FBI’s Uniform fender, for example, may damage or vandalize prop- Crime Reporting (UCR) Program developed a data erty because of his/her bias against the owner’s collection system for that purpose. Hate Crime (victim’s) race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity/ Statistics, 1990: A Resource Book was the first national origin, or disability. Therefore, rather than publication that made available the hate crime data create new crime categories, Program developers collected in 1990 by 11 individual states. Once the decided that collecting additional information about national UCR Program implemented a uniform data crimes currently being reported to the UCR Program collection method, the 1992 edition of Hate Crime would fulfill the directives addressed in the Hate Crime Statistics premiered the data reported by law en- Statistics Act as amended. forcement agencies across the Nation. Because motivation is subjective, it is difficult Bias against persons with disabilities became to know with certainty whether a crime was the result an element of hate crime data collection guidelines with of the offender’s bias. Law enforcement investigation the enactment of the Violent Crime and Law Enforce- is imperative in that it must reveal sufficient evidence as ment Act of 1994, which amended the Hate Crime to whether the offender’s actions were motivated, in Statistics Act. (Actual collection of data from disabil- whole or in part, by bias. For this reason, the success ity bias-motivated crimes began on January 1, 1997.) of the Program rests with the local law enforcement Another amendment followed in July 1996 when the agency’s participation in reporting bias-motivated Church Arson Prevention Act was signed into law, offenses so that this information can be forwarded to removing the sunset clause from the original statute the state and subsequently to the national Program. and permanently extending the data collection man- The International Association of Chiefs of date. The FBI shares its commitment to make hate Police, the National Sheriffs’ Association, the former crime data collection a permanent part of the UCR UCR Data Providers’ Advisory Policy Board (now Program with each law enforcement agency that is a part of the Criminal Justice Information Services voluntary participant of the Program. Advisory Policy Board), the International Association of Directors of Law Enforcement Standards and Collection Design Training, and the Association of State Uniform Crime Reporting Programs have all endorsed the Hate Crime The goal of the Hate Crime Statistics Act and Data Collection Program. Without their support and its subsequent amendments is to capture information law enforcement’s voluntary data collection, any effort about the type of bias serving as the motivating factor toward the successful implementation of the Program would be futile. 1 Participation their respective state UCR Programs (see Appendix) that forwarded the state’s information to the national In 1999, nearly 17,000 law enforcement Program. Participating agencies in states without state agencies nationwide reported data to the UCR UCR Programs sent their data directly to the FBI. Program. A total of 12,122 law enforcement agencies Collectively, these agencies represented nearly 233 in 48 states and the District of Columbia submitted million people in the United States, approximately 85 summary or incident-based reports to the Hate Crime percent of the population. Though the reports from Data Collection Program. The table below shows the these agencies are insufficient to allow valid national or number of agencies represented within each popula- regional measure of the volume and types of crimes tion group and the extent of the population covered. motivated by hate, they offer perspectives on the Of those participating agencies, most sent their data to general nature of hate crime occurrence. Number of Agencies by Population Group, 1999 Population Number of Population group participating agencies covered Total 12,122 232,829,887 Group I (Cities 250,000 and over) 63 46,170,286 Group II (Cities 100,000 - 249,999) 138 20,181,077 Group III (Cities 50,000 - 99,999) 352 24,009,970 Group IV (Cities 25,000 - 49,999) 662 22,751,314 Group V (Cities 10,000 - 24,999) 1,521 23,964,721 Group VI 1 (Cities under 10,000) 6,036 19,908,509 Suburban Counties2 1,111 50,935,884 Rural Counties 2 2,239 24,908,126 1Includes universities and colleges to which no population is attributed. 2Includes state police agencies and other agencies to which no population is attributed. Historically, the law enforcement community collection of hate crime statistics at the local level, law has recognized that valid information is central to enforcement agencies have the ability to heighten the developing effective measures to deal with crime; the awareness and the understanding of bias-motivated same is true for bias-motivated crime. Through the crimes both locally and nationwide. 2 METHODOLOGY Data Reporting In NIBRS, the hate crime data element applies to all 46 Group “A” Offenses, which include In accordance with the Hate Crime Statistics the previously mentioned 11 offense categories. The Act and its subsequent amendments, the Uniform remaining 35 Group “A” Offenses not listed are Crime Reporting (UCR) Program compiles data reported in this publication as other or as crimes regarding crimes motivated by racial, religious, disabil- against society, whichever is appropriate. ity, sexual-orientation, and ethnicity/national origin biases. City, county, and state law enforcement Data Compilation agencies may submit hate crime data to the UCR Program using the Quarterly Hate Crime Report Form Once the UCR Program receives the data, or the hate crime data element for the National Inci- they are compiled in tables and discussed in narrative dent-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OLEANDER, REVIEW and OUTLOOK Published 1922 by the Association of Olean Old Timers, in Behalf of the Olean Historical Association, Inc
    OLEANDER, REVIEW AND OUTLOOK Published 1922 by the Association of Olean Old Timers, in Behalf of the Olean Historical Association, Inc. Transcribed by Sue Carney, February, 2004 Note: This wonderful book about the history of Olean contains many photos of various Olean residents from the early 1900s. To see if a member of your family is mentioned in the book, use your Edit/Find function of your word processor. Many thanks to Sue Carney for transcribing the entire text, and to Lee Billington for scanning all the photographs so I could add them to the digital document. Laura Greene February 2004 Coordinator, Cattaraugus County Bio and Census Index Projects [email protected] or [email protected] This Section--Part One Of the Oleander, Review and Outlook Comprises descriptive and illustrated evidences of the Progress and Enterprise of the City of Natural Advantages, indicated by Historical matter in relation to the Churches, Banking Institutions, Hospitals and the Medical Profession Generally. ___________ The Circular Diagram Map which forms the central figure on the front page of this cover graphically shows the central location in Western New York of Olean and indicates its manifest importance as a focus for trade, travel and traffic of an extensive territory which is manifesting unmistakable signs of still further expansion not excelled by any other section of the same proportions in the Empire State. ___________ THE NEXT SECTION, PART TWO of the publication will be devoted to the Industrial, Commercial, Real Estate, Hotels, Restaurants and other important interests of the steadily growing city and among other novel features, a number of striking views of “Olean by Night” will be printed and likewise an outline map of the Liberty Highway between Binghamton and Jamestown will be featured.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Crimes in 2001
    Foreword In response to Congress’ passage of the Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990 and subsequent acts that amended the directive, the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program collects and publishes data on crimes motivated by racial, religious, ethnicity/national-origin, sexual-orientation, and disability bias. In 2001, 9,730 bias-motivated incidents were voluntarily reported by law enforcement agencies nationwide. From the fi rst year that national hate crime data were published in 1992 until 2000, incidents motivated by racial bias comprised the largest portion of reported hate crime incidents followed by incidents motivated by a religious bias and those motivated by bias against sexual orientation. The fewest number of hate crime incidents resulted from ethnicity or national-origin bias, until the addition of the disability bias in 1997, which then became the lowest portion of reported hate crime incidents. That distribution changed in 2001, presumably as a result of the heinous incidents that occurred on September 11. For many offenders, the preformed negative opinion, or bias, was directed toward ethnicity/ national origin. Consistent with past data, by bias type, law enforcement reported that most incidents in 2001 were motivated by bias against race. However, crime incidents motivated by bias against ethnicity/national origin were the second most frequently reported bias in 2001, more than doubling the number of incidents, offenses, victims, and known offenders from 2000 data. Additionally, the anti-other ethnicity/national origin category quadrupled in incidents, offenses, victims, and known offenders. Another noticeable increase in 2001 was among religious-bias incidents. Anti-Islamic religion incidents were previously the second least reported, but in 2001, they became the second highest reported among religious-bias incidents (anti-Jewish religion incidents were the highest), growing by more than 1,600 percent over the 2000 volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithboro, a Means of Bringing Supplies Bring Salt
    516 HISTORY OF CENTRAL NEW YORK of the settlements, the first framed one being in Owego about 1802. The first church formed in the county was the Baptist Church of New Bedford, organized February 20, 1796, by settlers in what is now the Town of Tioga. It had but nine members. As early as November 10, 1819, there was an agricultural society in the county. Tioga County, according to the official postal guide for July, 1930, has the following post offices: Apalachin, Barton, Berkshire, Candor, Catatonk, Halsey Valley, Lockwood, Lounsberry, New ark Valley, Nichols, North Spencer, Owego, Richford, Smithboro, South Apalachin, Spencer, Straits Corners, Tioga Center, Waits, Waverly, Willseyville. OWEGO. Owego, known as the southern gateway to the lake country, is a village of 4,739 inhabitants finely situated on the Susque hanna, near the mouth of Owego Creek. In 1922 the state com pleted the final link of the New York-Finger Lakes-Buffalo cross state motor route, thus placing Owego on a route fifty miles shorter than the old New York-Albany-Buffalo highway. At Owego the traveler leaves the Liberty highway and follows the new road to Ithaca. From time immemorial the Susquehanna River at Owego and the Finger Lakes at Ithaca have been connected first by an Indian trail, next by a pioneer roadway cut in 1789, and then the turnpike built from 1808 to 1811. During the War of 1812 this highway was of great value as a means of bringing supplies to the Atlantic seaboard, the Susquehanna River at that time being an important artery of commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaverkill Master Plan
    BEAVERKILL MASTER PLAN ROSCOE, NEW YORK W OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE // ALLIANCE FOR NEW YORK STATE PARKS CONCEPT REPORT 2016 W Architecture and Landscape Architecture, LLC This Concept Report was created for the Open Space Institute (OSI), acting through its Alliance for New York State Parks program and in close cooperation with the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). The report has been prepared for the purposes of generating ideas and dialogue for improvements to the land- scape and cultural interpretation at the greater Beaverkill landscape and the Beaverkill Covered Bridge Land- ing. The diagrams and drawings included herein are to be considered representational and illustrative and shall not be used for any purpose without the express written consent of the Open Space Institute. TEAM W Architecture and Landscape Architecture Green Shield Ecology Studio REDE VJ Cost Estimating Cover Photo: Copyright Ben A Cobb Photo 2 BEAVERKILL CAMPGROUND W Architecture and Landscape Architecture, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 Project Background Regional Map Project Description Goals and Objectives Stakeholder Goals 02 History and Analysis Cultural History Analysis Ecological Assessment Present Condition Assessment Design Opportunities 03 Proposed Landscape Plan Landscape Precedents Proposed Design Ecological Restoration Plan Succession in the Hemlock - Northern Hardwood Forest Stand Development Planting Plan Covered Bridge Landing Enlarged Plan Interpretive Center Precedents Cultural Interpretation Strategy 04 Stakeholder Engagement 05 Cost
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel Rathbun) Cards for All Occasions
    *779 ^192.9 Aerial Experiment Association o( twenty years ago at Hammondsport Left to right: "Casey" Baldwin Lieut Thomas Selfridge, Glenn H. Curtiss Dr Alexander Graham Bel1, A. D. McCurdy and Augustus Post. ylviation ^Imongthe Finger Lakes INGS that have brought new horizons to friend of Dr. Samuel Pierpont Langley, and an observer mankind fluttered as fledglings above the ot the experiments in mechanical flight carried on by Finger Lakes before the World War demon- Langley, organized the Aerial Experiment Associa- _ strated that man-made machines could tion for the purpose of carrying on scientific experi- roar through storm and night. A world flies today, ments with flying machines. but veteran aviators still remember that the "Cradle He invited as a member of that group Glenn H. of Aviation" was in New York's lake country, center- Curtiss, who since 1903 had been the outstanding ing around Hammondsport at the head of Lake Keuka. American designer of light engines. Since 1903 Mr. Something happened in that little lake village on Curtiss had held National motorcycle championships; July 4, 1908. Glenn Hammond Curtiss, bred among in 1901 he had established a world's speed record for the lakes, announced that he would make the first ten miles that stood for ten years; one of his engines public airplane flight in America. He did. He flew a had been fitted to Captain Thomas S. Baldwin's dirig- mile. The boy bicyclist, motorcycle mechanic and ible, the "California Arrow." All dirigibles in the racer became the world's greatest developer of avia- country were using Curtiss engines.
    [Show full text]
  • The Octofoil, January 1949
    College of the Holy Cross CrossWorks The Octofoil Special Collections 1-1-1949 The Octofoil, January 1949 Ninth Infantry Division Association Follow this and additional works at: https://crossworks.holycross.edu/octofoil Part of the Military and Veterans Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ninth Infantry Division Association, "The Octofoil, January 1949" (1949). The Octofoil. 23. https://crossworks.holycross.edu/octofoil/23 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at CrossWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Octofoil by an authorized administrator of CrossWorks. One Year, 60 cents NUMBER 1 THE NINTH INFANTRY DIVISION ASSOCIATION Single Copy, 10 cents WASHING'(ON (13), D. C. (P. O. Box 1104) JANUARY, 1949 GOOD SAMARI-TAN FINALLY LOCATED SHOlJLD AULD FORGOT? OCTOFOIL SECURES STATEMENT FROM TINGLEY AS TO HOW HE LOCATED EX-MEDIC-AND A STATEMENT FROM PILL-PUSHER WHO HELPED PAUL JACKSON. In answer to an inquiry from The Octofoil, Secretary­ Treasurer Tingley sent the following reply which is self­ explanatory and makes very interesting reading. Raymond S. Griffith's letter explaining his emotions when he met Paul Jackson at the Ralph Edward's radio broadcast fol­ lows the secretary's letter and Ray's letter is' also an all­ absorbing narrative. The letters follow: Mr. Paul S. Plunkett, Editor, Octofoil, next day I would leave them so 216 S. Grant Ave., Columbus, O. I could travel light. However, on Dear Paul: On Thursday, Oct. the day Paul was wounded I still 7 I received a long distance tele- had two blankets.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 1992 Vol9 No.4 Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission J
    Pennsylvania The Keysto,ie State s OfficialScatiii.q M7gazi7e -1,;v17:: • 1.14 ;". , Viewpoint On July 16, it was my pleasure to participate in the third annual Over and Under the Delaware River Cleanup sponsored by Kittatinny Canoes, the largest canoe liv- ery on the Delaware River and the oldest continually operating livery in Pennsyl- vania. I arrived at Dingmans Ferry about 9 a.m. Other volunteers were already begin- ning to arrive. The weather was threatening, but by 10 o'clock more than 250 people from Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey were on site and ready to go. After a coordination and safety briefing, we were assigned to various sections of the river. My group of about 40 was assigned to a nine-mile stretch from Bushkill to Smithfield Beach. A 20-minute bus ride took us to our put-in where our canoes were waiting. Our guide and leader was Ruth Jones, president of Kittatinny Canoes. During the day we were to find that no one knew more about the river nor cared for its future pres- ervation than she. Her life has been the river and her affection for it was evident to all that day. Our collection of trash began almost immediately. Soda bottles, beer cans, plas- tics, milk jugs,chairs, styrofoam bait containers and coffee cups,shopping carts and assorted other items of household trash began to fill our canoes. An aluminum lad- der was found a mile from our launch site as was a kitchen sink. It wasn't long before we retrieved our first of many automobile tires.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaris Capture Pro Software
    wI r NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No 1024-0018 (June 1991) United States Department of the Interior JU APR23 1992 iU National Park Service HlSiOiUC PRESERVATION National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several histone contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic and Architectural Resources of the Upper Delaware Valley, New York and Pennsylvania B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Upper Delaware Exploration, Trade and Early Settlement, 1614-1810 Upper Delaware Transportation, 1614-1942 Upper Delaware Industry, 1614-1942 C. Form Prepared by name/title Mary Curtis Cultural Resources Specialist organization Nat~irrnal Park Service date 4/21/92 717-729-7842 street & number P. 0. Box C telephone city or town Narrnw.qhnrg state New York zip code 12764 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • State Regulation of Interstate Motor Carriers
    Washington University Law Review Volume 14 Issue 2 January 1929 State Regulation of Interstate Motor Carriers John J. George Converse College Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John J. George, State Regulation of Interstate Motor Carriers, 14 ST. LOUIS L. REV. 136 (1929). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol14/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ST. LOUIS LAW REVIEW STATE REGULATION OF INTERSTATE MOTOR CARRIERS BY JOHN J. GEORGE MAGNITUDE OF INTERSTATE OPERATION As could be easily foreseen, motor transportation has not recognized the accidents of state lines. It was imperative that this transportation become interstate, especially in urban areas near state lines, such for example as New York City, Washing- ton, Chicago, and St. Louis. Similarly, states like Massa- chusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, because of smallness of area, were destined to become the scene of extensive interstate operations.1 The mileage of interstate bus routes serves as one index to the magnitude of interstate motor carriage. Of the total 263,000 of common carrier bus route mileage in the United States 48,362 or approximately one-fifth is interstate. Of this interstate mileage Oregon has 2996; California, 2895; Massachusetts, 3000; Missouri, 3491; and New Jersey, 4488. We find, ex- pressed in percentage of entire bus route mileage (interstate and intrastate), that interstate bus route mileage constitutes 32 per cent in Oregon and Massachusetts; 40 in California; 62 in New Jersey; 70 in Rhode Island; and 93 per cent in the District of Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Hate Crime Statistics
    FOREWORD terilized from emotion, hate crime, also called bias crime, is those offenses motivated in part or singularly by personal prejudice against others because of a diversity—race, sexual orientation, Sreligion, ethnicity/national origin, or disability. The FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program’s responsibility regarding hate crime is to provide a reliable set of statistics through the Hate Crime Data Collection Program. Through this program, law enforcement agencies nationwide voluntar- ily submit data about hate crimes within their jurisdictions (i.e., the number of incidents, offenses, victims, and offenders) for publication in the annual report, Hate Crime Statistics. Though law enforce- ment agencies need only report data for one month of a year to be included in this publication, most agencies that participate in the Program submit four quarters of data. In 2000, a total of 91.9 percent of all contributing agencies submitted four quarters of data. All data reported by law enforcement agencies are presented in this publication, free of the nuances that many factions of society impose upon the subject. The uses for hate crime data vary widely among the different sectors of society. The statistics may assist law enforcement agencies in addressing potentially problematic issues for their particular locales or provide lawmakers with justification for certain legislation. The data may supply the media with credible information or simply show hate crime victims that they are not alone. Analyses of these data can also aid researchers in determining trends in hate crimes. Whatever the use of the statistics may be, the goal of this publication is to enable these data users to create an awareness about hate crime and advance the study of this complex facet of crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Be Our GUEST!
    men rangers KIWANIS CLUB Wheeler Held For McGowan names local NAMES DELEGATES Court Monzani and Lovell to At- Superior Groetzebach And At Start Of Dash To Break Post-Gatty Record tend N. E. Convention Bonds Reduced to $2,500 After Accused Waives Ex- at Cape Cod. amination This Morning in Borough Court Selected un- Guarini torranceIs" SPEAKER (Special to the Democrat) perlor court. Bond* of $1,000 Naugatuck, July 29.—Gerald F. dor which Wheeler hu boon bold John T. Monzani, presi- Coroner Wheeler of charged since found liable by Coroner John Frank- Wlterbury, dent of the Kiwanis club, were reduced to Grand Chief automobile homicide, through Monpanl $2,500. Rob- with By lyn T. Stlbbs, secretary and Wheeler was the operator of the of the Mc- ert Lovell, a member club, his counsel. Attorney Thomas car which crashed into a truck of from were to-day elected delegates Grath of Waterbury, waived ex- the Laskaa Motor Lines on River- Efforts in the Kiwanis club to at- Workers Rewarded for Untiring Selling Waterbury In the borough court side drive on May 2. The accident the New convention amination tend England Clare- resulted In the death of Mrs Ade- cm this morning before Judge Slate for State Made to be held at Cape Cod, Mass, line of Waterbury, a pas- Organization—Complete mont I. Tolies and was bound over Higgins September 9, 10, 11 and 12. They in the Wheeler car. to the September term of the su- senger Public were named at the weekly meet- L To-day ing of the club at the Elton to- day.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Travel Guide
    2021 Travel Guide Don’t miss our Bus “Meet” & “Greets” See page 1 for locations 864-225-7783 Toll Free 800-972-1741 Fax 864-261-3513 www.ionospheretours.com This travel guide is a current list of our tours for 2021. As new tours are added we will send updates in the form of a newsletter during the year. “Still strong because of you!” STOP BY AND VISIT US FOR OUR “MEET & “GREETS”… Due to suggested “social distancing” guidelines provided by the CDC, we have made the decision to have our “get acquainted tour preview” meetings in the Walmart parking lots listed below. We’ll bring one of our buses and have a table set up outside the bus with 2021 Travel Guides, gift certificates and some ‘give- aways’. Bring a friend and get extra gift certificates. We’ll be on hand to answer questions, take deposits and share information for our 2021 tours. Mark your calendar to stop by and say hello, pick-up a gift cer- tificate and take advantage of our early booking discounts. We really miss our fellowship with all of you and hope to see your “eyes” at one of the meeting places. Don’t forget your mask! THURSDAY FEBRUARY 11, 2021 WALMART – LIBERTY HIGHWAY – ANDERSON, SC ANYTIME BETWEEN 1:00 PM AND 4:00 PM FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2021 WALMART – EDGEFIELD ROAD – N. AUGUSTA, SC ANYTIME BETWEEN 1:00 PM AND 4:00 PM Hope to see you there!!! Page 1 The Virginia International Tattoo April 15 - 18 PAGE 3 Smoky Mountain Quiltfest May 5 - 7 PAGE 4 Golden Isles of Georgia May 12 - 15 PAGE 5 Discover Chattanooga May 21 - 23 PAGE 6 Mackinac Island Michigan June 7 - 15 PAGE
    [Show full text]