DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 19 Issue 1 Article 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume 19 Issue 1 Article 1 Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 19 Issue 1 Article 1 December 1940 Table of Contents - Volume 19 Chicago-Kent Law Review Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Chicago-Kent Law Review, Table of Contents - Volume 19, 19 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. i (1940). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol19/iss1/1 This Front Matter is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW Volume XIX 1940-1941 Published by the Students of CHICAGO-KENT COLLEGE OF LAW CHICAGO, ILLINOIS Copyright 1942, Chicago-Kent College of Law TABLE OF LEADING ARTICLES Page BANK STOCK LIABILrY AND THE HOLDING COMPANY DEVICE ................................... William S. McClanahan 160 ILLINOIS CIVIL PROCEDURE ............................. Harry N. Gottlieb 342 LANDLORD AND TENANT-THE CONDITION OF THE PREMISES ........................... Walter L. Schlegel, Jr. 317 PROPOSED ILLINOIS REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE ACT .......... Hazel Crawford 141 SECTION 29 OF THE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT OF ILLINOIS ............................. George W. Angerstein 231 SURVEY OF ILLINOIS LAW FOR THE YEAR 1939-1940 ........................ 1 THE APPORTIONMENT OF COST OF RAILROAD HIGHWAY CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS IN ILLINOIS ......... Hamilton Treadway 257 TABLE OF CASES CITED Names in italics are of cases discussed in Notes and Comments and Discussion of Recent Decisions A Andrew v. Citizens State Bank of Mt. Vernon, Iowa Ackin's Estate, In re (Iowa) ... 296 (Iowa) .................... 164, 166 Adams v. Gill (Ill.) ............ 102 Andrews v. Andrews (U.S.) .... 120 Adams v. Johnson (Ill.) ......... 211 Andrews v. Montgomery Ward Adams v. Shepard (Ill.) ......... 196 & Co. (F .) ....................... 212 Adler v. Adler (Ill.) .............. 16 Anglo-California Trust Co. v. Adler Sign Service Letter Co. v. Hall (Utah) .................... 308 Wagner Sign Service, Inc. (F.) 392 Anonymous v. Anonymous Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Board of (N .Y .S.) ........................ 120 County Com'rs of Hamilton Anson v. Anson (Iowa) ........... 388 County (F.) .................... 197 Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford v. (U.S.) ......................... 291 Haworth (U.S.) ............... 365 Appeal of Agnes (Eng.) .......... 182 Agar Packing & Provision Co. v. Appeal of Denis (Eng.) ........ 182, 183 Becker (Ill. App.) ... 14, 246, 248, 249 Appeal of Jordan (Eng.) ......... 182 Ainscow v. Sanitary Company of Appeal of Richard (Eng.) ........ 182 America (Del.) ................. 380 Arkin v. Page (Ill.) .............. 204 Akin v. Akin (Ill.) ............... 189 Arling v. Zeitz (Ill. Albers v. Tau Kappa Epsilon App.) .................. 332, 334, 335 Fraternity (Ill. App.) ......... 20 Arms v. Ayer (Ill.) ............ 339, 340 Albers, Successor Receiver v. Armstrong v. Armstrong Bramberg (Ill. App.) ............ 276 (Ill.) ........................... 224 Alderson v. State (Ind.) ........... 186 Armstrong v. Zounis (Ill. App.) .. 10 Allen v. Beemer (Ill.) ........... 25 Arthur v. Israel (Colo.) .......... 121 Allen v. Bowen (Ill.) ......... 224, 225 Asbestos Shingle & Sheathing Allen v. McFerson (Colo.) ...... 163 Co. v. Johns-Mansville Co. (F.)...395 Allen v. Tate (F.) .............. 222 Asher v. Ingels (F.) .............. 287 Allington & Curtis Mfg. Co. v. Ashley v. Ashley (Eng.) ......... 94 Booth (F.) ..................... 395 Ashlock v. Vivell (Ill. App.)..302, 303 Allis v. Stowell (F.) .............. 394 Atherton v. Atherton (U.S.) ...... 120 Allison v. Bartelt (Wash.) ........ 203 Atkinson v. United Rys. Co. Almar Forming Mach. Co. v. (M o.) ........................... 201 F. & W. Metal F. Mach. Co. Atoka Milling Co. v. Groomer (Ill. App.) ..................... 68 (O kla.) ......................... 279 Aluminum Industries, Inc. v. Auburn Draying Co. v. Wardell Egan (Ohio) .................... 191 (N .Y .) ......................... 384 American Car & Foundry Co. v. Augusta Ry. Co. v. Glover Anderson (F.) .............. 115, 296 (G a.) ........................... 113 American Federation of Labor v. Austin v. Strong (Tex.) ...... 163, 166 Swing (U.S.) ................... 12 Avery's Estate, In re (N.Y.S.) 220, 222 American National Bank of Mt. Carmel v. Holsen (Ill.) ......... 163 B American National Bank of San Francisco v. Sommerville, Inc. Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Read- (Cal.) ....................... 308, 309 ing Coal & Iron Co. (N.Y.) ...... 139 American Optical Co. v. Nudel- Bailey v. Neale (Ohio App.) ..... 283 m an (I1.) ...................... 80 Bailey Meter Co. v. Owens- American Steel Foundries v. Tri- Illinois Glass Co. (F.) ......... 79 City Central Trades Council Baillis v. Fuchs (N.Y.) ......... 383 (U .S.) .......................... 291 Baird v. Shipman (Ill.) .......... 318 ......... 71, 72 Andersen v. Byrnes (Ill) ...... 204, 205 Baker v. Brown (Ill.) Baker v. Healy Co. (Ill. Abbott (F.) ... : ..... 172 Anderson v. App.) ...................... 2, 47, 56 Anderson v. Atkinson (F.) ....... 172 Baldwin v. Ferguson (Ill. App.)..103 Anderson v. Eastman (Ill. App.) 210 Balian v. Ogassian (Mass.) ...... 284 Anderson v. Fielding (Minn.) .... 111 Ball v. United States (U.S.) ...... 185 Anderson v. Moore (Ill. App.) ... 328 Baltimore & 0. R. Co. v. Inter- Anderson v. Steger (Ill.) ......... 274 state Commerce Commission Anderson v. Wetter (Me.) ........ 111 (U .S.) .......................... 214 TABLES OF CASES CITED Baltzer v. City of Chicago (Ill. Bias v. Atkinson (W. Va.) ...... 195 App.) ......... 8 Bickerstaff, In re (Cal.) ......... 378 Bandy v. Bandy (S.C.) ........... 377 Biddy v. Blue Bird Air Service Bank of America v. Jorjorian (Ill ) ............................ 400 (Ill. App.) ...................... 34 Bigelow v. Oglesby (Ill. App.) ..... 58 Bank of Tennessee v. Nelson Biggins v. People (Ill.) .......... 314 (Tenn.) ........................ 228 Bimslager v. Bimslager (Ill.) 224, 225 Bank of the United States v. Bingel v. Volz (Ill.) ............. 226 Deveaux (U.S.) .................. 136 Binkert v. Wabash Ry. Co. Barbour v. Thomas (F.)..170, 171, 174, (Ill.) .......................... 314 180 Binney's Will, In re (Mass.) . 197 Barcolini v. Atlantic City & Birch v. Abercrombie (Wash.) . .203 S. R. Co. (N. J.) ............... 285 Birch v. Pittsburg, C. C. & St. Barlass' Estate, In re (Wis.) ... 294 L. Ry. Co. (Pa.) ............... 111 Barnett v. Cook County Birdsell v. Shaliol (U.S.) 393, 394, 395 (Ill.) ........................... 82 Bishop v. Morgan (Ill.) ...... 224, 226 Barnhart v. American Concrete Bissell Carpet Sweeper Co. v. Steel Co. (N.Y.) ............... 399 Goshen Sweeper Co. (F.) ...... 397 Barr v. Essex Trades Council Bjorngard v. Goodhue County (N .J.) ........................... 384 Bank (M inn.) .................. 194 Barrett v. Hinckley (Ill.) ....... 294 Black v. Baltimore & 0. Ry. Barry v. Commonwealth Edison Co. (Pa.) ....................... 111 Co. (Ill. App.) ................. 86 Black v. Manhattan Trust Co. Barth v. Pock (Mont.) .......... 163 (F .) ............................ 388 Bartlett Frazier Co. v. Hyde Blackstone Shop v. Ashman (F .) ............................ 216 (Ill. App.) ...................... 206 Bates' Will, In re (N.Y.S.) ... 220, 221 Blake v. Greenwood Cemetery Bauer v. Commercial Credit Co. (F .) ............................ 393 (W ash.) ........................ 105 Blake v. Ranous (Ill. App.) 318, 329 Baum v. Industrial Commission Blakeslee's Storage Warehouses, (Ill.) ........................... 51 Inc. v. City of Chicago (Ill.) ... 77 Baumann v. Baumann (N.Y.) .... 120 Blanford v. Press Publishing Baxter v. People (Ill.) ........ 278, 279 Co. (K y.) ....................... 292 Bayer v. Brotherhood of Paint- Blanford v. Press Publishing ers (N . J.) ..................... 384 Co. (F .) ........................ 292 Bayofski v. Rosenberg (Ill. Blaszynski v. Starczewski (Ill.) ... 75 App.) .......................... 318 Bledsoe v. Seaman (Kan.) ....... 121 Beach v. Beach (F.) .......... 198, 201 Blessing v. Welding (Iowa) ...... 50 Beach v. City of St. Joseph Block v. Bell Furniture Co. (Mich.) ........................ 111 (N . J .) .......................... 119 Beal v. Chase (Mich.) ......... 168 Bloor v. Platt (Ohio) .............. 228 Beale v. Hileman (Ill.) .......... 274 Board of Charities v. Lockard Beall Bros. Supply Co. v. Ind. (P a.) ........................... 132 Com . (Ill.) ...................... 398 Board of Education of City of Beckett v. F. W. Woolworth Co. Rockford v. City of Rockford (Ill. App.) ...................... 210 (Ill.) ........................... 24 Beech-Nut Packing Co. v. P. Board of National Missions of Lorillard Co. (F.) ............. 137 the Presbyterian Church v. Beer v. Beer (Ohio App.) ......... 283 Sherry (Ill.) .................... 27 Bel v. Adler (Ga.) ............... 211 Bodden v. Thomas (Ill. Bell v. Farwell (Ill.) .............. 163 App.) ................ 318, 320, 331 Berghoff Printing Co., In re Boender v. City of Harvey (F .) ............................. 298 (Ill.) ........................... 3 Berkowitz, In re (F.) ............ 168 Bogart v. Amanda Consolidated Berkowitz v. Lester (Ill.) ...... 98, 109 Gold Mining Co. (Colo.) ........ 386 Berk v. Mason (Eng.) ...........
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Index to 1986-1998 Sets ( by Series)
    Page INDEX to 1986 – 1998 SETS 1 of 13 By Series Instr. Set No. Set Name Series Year Set Picture Manual Notes 1 - Standard Sets 0202(2) Set Nr. 2 Enthusiast 1986 0203(2) Set Nr. 3 Enthusiast 1986 0204(2) Set Nr. 4 Enthusiast 1986 0205(2) Set Nr. 5 Enthusiast 1986 to 1991 0206(2) Set Nr. 6 Enthusiast 1986 to 1991 0207(2) Set Nr. 7 Enthusiast 1986 to 1992 0208(2) Set Nr. 8 Enthusiast 1986 to 1992 0209(2) Set Nr. 9 Enthusiast 1986 to 1992 0210(2) Set Nr. 10 Enthusiast 1986 to 1992 1212(2) Set 2X Enthusiast 1986 Complementary Sets Page INDEX to 1986 – 1998 SETS 2 of 13 By Series Instr. Set No. Set Name Series Year Set Picture Manual Notes 1213(2) Set 3X Enthusiast 1986 Complementary Sets 1214(2) Set 4X Enthusiast 1986 Complementary Sets 1215(2) Set 5X Enthusiast 1986 Complementary to Sets 1991 1216(2) Set 6X Enthusiast 1986 Complementary to Sets 1992 1217(2) Set 7X Enthusiast 1986 Complementary to Sets 1992 1218(2) Set 8X Enthusiast 1986 Complementary to Sets 1992 1219(2) Set 9X Enthusiast 1986 Complementary to Sets 1992 0301(1) Set Nr. 1 Beginners (1) 1987 to 1989 0302(1) Set Nr. 2 Beginners (1) 1987 to 1989 0303(1) Set Nr. 3 Beginners (1) 1987 to 1989 0304(1) Set Nr. 4 Beginners (1) 1987 to 1989 Page INDEX to 1986 – 1998 SETS 3 of 13 By Series Instr. Set No. Set Name Series Year Set Picture Manual Notes 1311(1) Set 1X Beginners (1) 1987 Complementary to Sets 1989 1312(1) Set 2X Beginners (1) 1987 Complementary to Sets 1989 1313(1) Set 3X Beginners (1) 1987 Complementary to Sets 1989 Conversion of 1314(1) Set 4X Beginners (1) 1987 Beginners set 4 Complementary to to Enthusiast set Sets 1989 5 0301(2) Set Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Improvement Project: Filter Manufacturing Department at BAT in Heidelberg
    BPJ 410 – Final Report Continuous Improvement Project: Filter Manufacturing Department at BAT in Heidelberg Benito Decina s28345186 Executive Summary Production industries are subject to the ebb and flow of demand and supply fluctuations, with an increase in a product’s demand driving up the supplier’s production. At BAT’s factory in Heidelberg, the Filter Manufacturing Department is currently operating at nothing more than 75% efficiency, and is the bottleneck in BAT’s production process. If BAT plans to keep up with the increase in consumer demand, improvement is needed. To achieve a more acceptable production efficiency of about 85 to 95%, blockages hindering filter supply need to be minimised, changeover times reduced, and waste production needs to be kept to a minimal. The only way to achieve this objective would be to analyse the current layout, identify its flaws and areas of improvement, and then implement a new layout that would improve the department’s performance and complement future objectives. With the aid of simulation models, information is retrieved to determine the extent of improvements the proposed layout will be able to provide. The freed up floor space created by the proposed layout design will also be looked at to determine its best possible use. The information gathered from the simulations as well as the available floor space will provide a clear indication of the viability of the proposed layout. i Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Background ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Senate the Senate Met at 9:30 A.M
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 152 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2006 No. 134 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was Eternal Lord God, our stronghold in Thank You for their investment in called to order by the President pro times of trouble, bless today our Sen- freedom and their sacrifices for our lib- tempore (Mr. STEVENS). ators. Lord, 65 years ago, America ex- erties. Comfort those who mourn and PRAYER perienced a day of infamy. As we re- those who bear the scars of battle. Be a member Pearl Harbor, our hearts turn companion to those who must stare at The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- fered the following prayer: toward the men and women of our an empty chair during this holiday sea- Let us pray. Armed Forces and their families. son. Defend those in harm’s way with N O T I C E The Government Printing Office will publish corrections to the Congressional Record as a pilot program that has been authorized by the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. Corrections to the online Congressional Record will appear on the page on which the error occurred. The corrections will also be printed after the History of Bills and Resolutions sec- tion of the Congressional Record Index for print-only viewers of the Congressional Record. By order of the Joint Committee on Printing. TRENT LOTT, Chairman. N O T I C E If the 109th Congress, 2d Session, adjourns sine die on or before December 15, 2006, a final issue of the Congres- sional Record for the 109th Congress, 2d Session, will be published on Wednesday, December 27, 2006, in order to permit Members to revise and extend their remarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Smoking and Quitting Behaviour in Lockdown South Africa
    SMOKING AND QUITTING BEHAVIOUR IN LOCKDOWN SOUTH AFRICA: RESULTS FROM A SECOND SURVEY Professor Corné van Walbeek Samantha Filby Kirsten van der Zee 21 July 2020 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is based on the results of an online survey, conducted between 4 June and 19 June 2020. The study was conducted by the Research Unit on the Economics of Excisable Products (REEP), an independent research unit based at the University of Cape Town. It was funded by the African Capacity Building Foundation, which in turn is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. This report follows on from our first report entitled “Lighting up the illicit cigarette market: Smokers’ responses to the cigarette sales ban in South Africa”, which was published on 15 May 2020. That report was based on an online survey conducted between 29 April and 11 May 2020. When the second survey was conducted, the ban on the sales of cigarettes had been extended, even as the country had moved from lockdown Level 4 to Level 3. The questionnaire was distributed on Twitter, Change.org (a petition site) and Moya (a data-free platform). The survey yielded 23 631 usable responses. In contrast to the first study, we did not weigh the data, because the sampling methodology (i.e. online survey) made it impossible to reach the poorer segments of society. We thus do not claim that the data is nationally representative; we report on the characteristics of the sample, not the South African smoking population. In the report we often report the findings by race and gender, because smoking behaviour in South Africa has very pronounced race-gender differences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconstruction of the Differential Analyzer in Meccano
    FEATURE A Reconstruction of the Differential Analyzer in Meccano The challenges of torque amplifiers, integrators, and backlash By Tim Robinson was first introduced to Meccano, a child’s educational construction set cre- ated in the United Kingdom, at about the age of six and quickly became fascinated with it as a medium for constructing working mechanisms and small machines. Over the next ten years or so, I gath- Iered quite a large collection. I first attempted to construct a differential analyzer in Meccano around 1971. I had just encountered calculus in high school and at the same time I started to develop an interest in computers. One of the first books I read on computers included a chapter on analog computation, and on the differential analyz- er in particular. Significantly, the book briefly men- ©DIGITALVISION tioned that simple differential analyzers had been constructed in Meccano in the 1930s. So began an inter- est that has remained with me for more than 30 years. Early Attempts My early attempts were not very successful because of the diffi- culty of constructing functioning torque amplifiers. When Hartree and Porter built the first Meccano differential analyzer at Manchester Universi- ty, their goal was to build a working machine quickly. They used Meccano simply because it was readily available and allowed them to avoid designing and custom machining most of the required parts. However, Hartree and Porter felt no constraint to stay within the limits of the Meccano system. In particular, they did not believe that adequate torque amplifiers could be made without custom machining.
    [Show full text]
  • MECCANO= WORKERS FIGHT Staff Were Taken Un
    CLASS STRU&&LE 14n11119Jiil!JQ!;I•111:ti;JJ1•111111•1:rJ;§IieJltl(tlil:lt111tt«lllni:J;JII!JI:I Vol.3 No.25 December 13th to December 26th 1979 fortnightly Sp MECCANO= WORKERS FIGHT staff were taken un. Work was going out and targets being met. HARDSHIP Wages were low at Meccano. The basic take home pay for operators was £40 per week~ ~ith bonus achieved on an individual basis , take home pay could be £50. Meccano was on of the first to settle in the engineers recent national dispute. The factory closure can only bring incre ~ sed hardship to the 940 workers. Liverpool ' s un­ employment level of approx. 12% is already much higher than the national average. In some areas of Liverpool such as Speke and Kirby, unemployment stands ·at 20% and even 30%. In the case of Meccano Class Struggle was told of one whole family work­ ing there and being hit by t he closure. At 4 Q'clock on Friday the 30th of November workers FIGHT BACK at Meccano in Liverpool were- bluntly told that the ~ · ,.4Ji.~·- The workers are taking the only course open to factory was closed and moving out lock~stock and them and that is to fight. The s tocks of toys and barrel. Not even the statutory notice of 90 days machines the workers are holding are s aid to be was given. A failure which even arch-reactionary .worth £2,000 , 000 . This puts them in a r elatively Thatcher had to ~eak out against . The part-timers strong position.
    [Show full text]
  • Meccano Radio Receiving Sets 1
    MECCANO RADIO RECEIVING SETS 1 England NAME MECCANO RADIO RECEIVING SET TYPE Special Radio Sets HOLE DIAMETER 4.2mm HOLE SPACING 12.7mm ( ½” ) SETS IN SYSTEM Total of 5 : RS1, RS2. Later No.1, No.2 and ASI Aerial Set. DIFFERENT PARTS 44 COLOUR Plain metal and black FIXING METHOD Nut and bolt MOTORS None PERIOD 1922 to 1926 MANUFACTURER Meccano Ltd., Binns Road, Liverpool, England COMMENTS The original RS1 & RS2 sets were only manufactured for a very short period. They were both the same radio. RS1 being fully built and RS2 being a kit. There were certain objections of infringement from the G.P.O. about the original sets concerning experimental receiving sets which required an additional ‘experimental license fee of 15 shillings, in addition to the normal Broadcast license fee of 10 shilling. Therefore a new Crystal sets were therefore introduced. No.1 being a non-constructional set and No.2 being a constructional set, very similar to the previous RS2. MATERIAL SUPPLIED BY J. Gamble, F.A. Beadle, Bruce Baxter, T. Edwards and Tony Press MECCANO (ENGLAND) - RADIO RECEIVING SETS 2 MECCANO (ENGLAND) - RADIO RECEIVING SETS 3/4 MECCANO (ENGLAND) - RADIO RECEIVING SETS 5 The original RS1/RS2 Crystal set MECCANO (ENGLAND) - RADIO RECEIVING SETS 7a Taken from manual Taken from Meccano Magazine July 1923 MECCANO (ENGLAND) - RADIO RECEIVING SETS 7b Taken from manual Taken from Meccano Magazine July 1923 MECCANO (ENGLAND) - RADIO RECEIVING SETS 7c An original No.1 Crystal set MECCANO (ENGLAND) - RADIO RECEIVING SETS 7d The box for the Radio receiving set – Note the pictures are of standard Meccano – NOT of the radio MECCANO (ENGLAND) - RADIO RECEIVING SETS 7e A replica of the No.2 radio by Tony Press MECCANO (ENGLAND) - RADIO RECEIVING SETS 7f A replica of the No.2 radio by Tony Press .
    [Show full text]
  • OLEANDER, REVIEW and OUTLOOK Published 1922 by the Association of Olean Old Timers, in Behalf of the Olean Historical Association, Inc
    OLEANDER, REVIEW AND OUTLOOK Published 1922 by the Association of Olean Old Timers, in Behalf of the Olean Historical Association, Inc. Transcribed by Sue Carney, February, 2004 Note: This wonderful book about the history of Olean contains many photos of various Olean residents from the early 1900s. To see if a member of your family is mentioned in the book, use your Edit/Find function of your word processor. Many thanks to Sue Carney for transcribing the entire text, and to Lee Billington for scanning all the photographs so I could add them to the digital document. Laura Greene February 2004 Coordinator, Cattaraugus County Bio and Census Index Projects [email protected] or [email protected] This Section--Part One Of the Oleander, Review and Outlook Comprises descriptive and illustrated evidences of the Progress and Enterprise of the City of Natural Advantages, indicated by Historical matter in relation to the Churches, Banking Institutions, Hospitals and the Medical Profession Generally. ___________ The Circular Diagram Map which forms the central figure on the front page of this cover graphically shows the central location in Western New York of Olean and indicates its manifest importance as a focus for trade, travel and traffic of an extensive territory which is manifesting unmistakable signs of still further expansion not excelled by any other section of the same proportions in the Empire State. ___________ THE NEXT SECTION, PART TWO of the publication will be devoted to the Industrial, Commercial, Real Estate, Hotels, Restaurants and other important interests of the steadily growing city and among other novel features, a number of striking views of “Olean by Night” will be printed and likewise an outline map of the Liberty Highway between Binghamton and Jamestown will be featured.
    [Show full text]
  • {TEXTBOOK} Dinky Toys Ebook
    DINKY TOYS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK David Cooke | 40 pages | 04 Mar 2008 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9780747804277 | English | London, United Kingdom Dinky Vintage Diecast Cars, Trucks and Vans for sale | eBay All Auction Buy it now. Sort: Best Match. Best Match. View: Gallery view. List view. Only 3 left. The Dinky Collection 4x models from the s. Dinky Toys Humber Hawk, very good condition. Only 1 left. Results pagination - page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hot this week. Dinky replacement tyres 17mm block tread for army vans DD7. Got one to sell? Shop by category. Vehicle Type see all. Car Transporter. Commercial Vehicle. Tanker Truck. Scale see all. Vehicle Make see all. Colour see all. Year of Manufacture see all. Material see all. Vehicle Year see all. This has influenced the value of vintage Dinky toys from this era. Dinky toys for sale are often valued higher, too, if they come with their original packaging. Skip to main content. Filter 1. Shop by Vehicle Type. See All - Shop by Vehicle Type. Shop by Vehicle Make. See All - Shop by Vehicle Make. All Auction Buy It Now. Sort: Best Match. Best Match. View: Gallery View. List View. Guaranteed 3 day delivery. Dinky SuperToys France No. Dinky Toys No. Benefits charity. Dinky Toys France No. Results Pagination - Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dinky One stop shop for all things from your favorite brand. Shop now. Hot This Week. Dinky Commer Hook No. Got one to sell? You May Also Like. Other Diecast Vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012.Pub
    FFFROM THE FIRST REGENT OVER THE PAST EIGHT YEARS , the plantation of George Mason enjoyed meticulous restoration under the directorship of David Reese. Acclaim was univer- sal, as the mansion and outbuildings were studied, re- paired, and returned to their original stature. Contents In response to the voices of community, staff, docents From the First Regent 2 and the legislature, the Board of Regents decided in early 2012 to focus on programming and to broadened interac- 2012 Overview 3 tion with the public. The consulting firm of Bryan & Jordan was engaged to lead us through this change. The work of Program Highlights 4 the Search Committee for a new Director was delayed while the Regents and the Commonwealth settled logistics Education 6 of employment, but Acting Director Mark Whatford and In- terim Director Patrick Ladden ably led us and our visitors Docents 7 into a new array of activity while maintaining the program- ming already in place. Archaeology 8 At its annual meeting in October the Board of Regents adopted a new mission statement: Seeds of Independence 9 To utilize fully the physical and scholarly resources of Museum Shop 10 Gunston Hall to stimulate continuing public exploration of democratic ideals as first presented by Staff & GHHIS 11 George Mason in the 1776 Virginia Declaration of Rights. Budget 12 The Board also voted to undertake a strategic plan for the purpose of addressing the new mission. A Strategic Funders and Donors 13 Planning Committee, headed by former NSCDA President Hilary Gripekoven and comprised of membership repre- senting Regents, staff, volunteers, and the Commonwealth, promptly established goals and working groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln International Closes Legendary Toy Brand Transaction
    LINCOLN INTERNATIONAL: CONSUMER GROUP TRANSACTION ANNOUNCEMENT Lincoln International Closes Legendary Toy Brand Transaction When Ingroup and 21 Centrale Partners contemplated an exit of their iconic French toy company, they sought advisors with depth of experience, powerful industry relationships and a track record of achieving premium valuations. Therefore, they selected Lincoln International’s Consumer team to take the lead. Lincoln’s senior & Ingroup investment bankers designed a process to deliver a focused message based on the Company’s key value drivers: Meccano’s leading brands in the fast growing have sold construction segment of the toy industry, strong international footprint, powerful multi- channel distribution network, flexible manufacturing and outsourcing strategy, attractive upside due to licensing opportunities and the launch of a new line emphasizing gameplay and realism. The process led to multiple compelling strategic options. Ultimately, the Company was sold to Spin Master Ltd. (“Spin Master”) which was eager to grow the Meccano and Erector brands through its renowned innovation to capabilities and global distribution network. Relevant Industry Verticals Toys Licensing International Sourcing Branded Products Consumer Goods Toy Manufacturing Transaction Overview Company Description: Founded over 100 years ago, Meccano is a pioneer in the construction toy universe. The Company manufactures and markets timeless model construction sets made of metal parts, nuts and bolts or flexible plastic components. Meccano’s legendary brand benefits from 95% prompted awareness in two of its strongest core markets (France and the UK). With exports accounting for 60% of total sales, Meccano boasts a strong international footprint with a presence in nearly 40 countries, including the US through the Erector brand.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Crimes in 2001
    Foreword In response to Congress’ passage of the Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990 and subsequent acts that amended the directive, the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program collects and publishes data on crimes motivated by racial, religious, ethnicity/national-origin, sexual-orientation, and disability bias. In 2001, 9,730 bias-motivated incidents were voluntarily reported by law enforcement agencies nationwide. From the fi rst year that national hate crime data were published in 1992 until 2000, incidents motivated by racial bias comprised the largest portion of reported hate crime incidents followed by incidents motivated by a religious bias and those motivated by bias against sexual orientation. The fewest number of hate crime incidents resulted from ethnicity or national-origin bias, until the addition of the disability bias in 1997, which then became the lowest portion of reported hate crime incidents. That distribution changed in 2001, presumably as a result of the heinous incidents that occurred on September 11. For many offenders, the preformed negative opinion, or bias, was directed toward ethnicity/ national origin. Consistent with past data, by bias type, law enforcement reported that most incidents in 2001 were motivated by bias against race. However, crime incidents motivated by bias against ethnicity/national origin were the second most frequently reported bias in 2001, more than doubling the number of incidents, offenses, victims, and known offenders from 2000 data. Additionally, the anti-other ethnicity/national origin category quadrupled in incidents, offenses, victims, and known offenders. Another noticeable increase in 2001 was among religious-bias incidents. Anti-Islamic religion incidents were previously the second least reported, but in 2001, they became the second highest reported among religious-bias incidents (anti-Jewish religion incidents were the highest), growing by more than 1,600 percent over the 2000 volume.
    [Show full text]