DOCSLIB.ORG

Judith Aissen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judith Aissen CURRICULUM VITAE JUDITH AISSEN Contact information · Department of Linguistics · [email protected] Stevenson College, UCSC 831-459-2386 (message) Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://people.ucsc.edu/ aissen/ Summary of education · Harvard University, 1974, PhD, Linguistics · Yale University, 1972, MA, Linguistics (awarded retroactively) · Fordham University, 1969, BA, English Literature, summa cum laude Summary of professional career · Professor Emerita of Linguistics, UC Santa Cruz, 2016- · Research Professor of Linguistics, UC Santa Cruz, 2010-2016 · Professor of Linguistics, UC Santa Cruz, 1987-2010 · Visiting Professor of Linguistics, Linguistic Institute, Summer 2005 (MIT) · Visiting Professor of Linguistics, Special Joint Summer School (Linguistics Society of Amer- ica/ Deutsche Gesellschaft f¨urSprachwissenschaft), D¨usseldorf,2002. · Visiting Professor of Linguistics, Linguistic Institute, Summer 1987 (Stanford University) · Associate Professor of Linguistics, UC Santa Cruz, 1983-1987 · Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Yale University, 1978-1983 · Visiting Assistant Professor of Linguistics, UC Santa Barbara, 1980-1981 · Visiting Lecturer in Linguistics, UCLA, 1978 · Lecturer in Linguistics, Harvard University, 1974-1976 · Instructor in Linguistics, Harvard University, 1973-1974 Professional honors, including grants and scholarships · Recipient of the 2019 Kenneth L. Hale Award, Linguistic Society of America · Invitation to hold Hale Chair, Summer LSA Institute 2015, University of Chicago [declined] · Fellow of the Linguistic Society of America, elected 2008 · NSF Grant #SBR-9818177, 1999-2003, Collaborative Research in `Optimal Typology' Syn- tactic Markedness Hierarchies in Optimality Theory. · Committee on Teaching Award, UCSC Academic Senate, June 1999 · NSF Grant #SBR-9630305, 1996-1998, The Syntax of Obviation in Mayan. · Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA, 1996-1997 · Presidential Fellowship in the Humanities, UC Office of the President, 1996-1997 · NSF Grant, 1986-1988 (with G.K. Pullum and W. Ladusaw) · Faculty Research Grants, UCSC Academic Senate, 1983-1997 Date: August 27, 2020. 1 August 27, 2020 · Morse Fellowship, 1982-83 · Fellow, Whitney Humanities Center, 1982-1983 · Whitney-Griswold Faculty Research Grant, Summer 1982 · Tinker Foundation Travel Grant, Summer 1982 · Yale College Distinguished Teaching Prize, May 1982 · Wenner-Gren Foundation Grant for Linguistic Fieldwork, Summer 1980 · ACLS Fellowship for Recent Ph.D. Recipients, July 1977-December 1977 · Fellow of the Radcliffe Institute, Cambridge, Mass. 1976-1977 Administrative positions · Graduate Director, Linguistics Department UCSC, 2006-2010 · Acting Chair, Linguistics Dept. UC Santa Cruz, 2001-2002 · Chair, Linguistics Board, UC Santa Cruz, 1991-1994 · Director, Syntax Research Center, UC Santa Cruz, 1987-90 · Director, Undergraduate Studies, Yale University, 1981-82 · Head Tutor in Linguistics, Harvard University, 1973-76 Other professional activities · Member, External review committee, Linguistics Dept. University of Kansas, February 2011 · Member, Awards Committee, Linguistic Society of America (LSA) 2008-2010 · Editorial Board, UC Publications in Linguistics, 2007-present · Advisory Board, eLanguage, 2006-2013 · Consultant Board, Advances in Optimality Theory, Equinox Publishers, 2005-present · Chair and member, Nominating Committee, LSA 2008 · Member, Nominating Committee, LSA, 2005-2007 · Member, Executive Committee, LSA, 1995-1998 · Member, Linguistics in the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee of the LSA, 1986-1988 · Member, Nominating Committee, LSA, 1989-1992 · Associate Editor, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1987-1990 · Associate Editor, Language, 1986-1988 · Associate Editor, Syntax and Semantics, Academic Press, 1980-? · Editor, Mayan Linguistics Newsletter, 1981-1986 · Editorial Board, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1982-1987 · Editorial Board, Studies in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1982-1987 · Organizer (with Jack DuBois), West Coast Mayan Symposium, April 1981 · Organizer, Taller Maya VI, Summer 1982 · Member, Visiting Committee to the Harvard Linguistics Department, 1982-1988 Other recent teaching · Instructor for Project on the morpho-syntax and semantics of Headless Relative Clauses in Mesoamerican languages - 2017-2018 (https://sites.google.com/view/mesoamerican) · At CIESAS Sureste, San Cristobal de las Casas, Mexico · Seminar: Information Structure, October-November, 2018 · Seminar: Focus and Clefts, April 2017 · Seminar: Relative Clauses, September 2015, June, 2013 · Seminar: Interrogatives, Topic, and Focus, Jan-Feb, 2012 · Seminar: Complementation, March, 2011 · Seminar: Ditransitives, Summer, 2010 2 August 27, 2020 · Workshop I: Complementation, Summer, 2006 · At 4th International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation (U Hawaii) · Master class on 'Documenting topic and focus', Februrary 2015 · At OKMA, Antigua, Guatemala · Instructor, Workshop II: Complementation, Summer 2007 Published books · 1987, Tzotzil clause structure, Reidel Publishers, Dordrecht. · 1979, The syntax of causative constructions, Garland Publishers: NY. Edited books · 2017, The Mayan Languages, Judith Aissen, Nora C. England, and Roberto Zavala Mal- donado, eds. Routledge. · 2010, La predicaci´onsecundaria en lenguas de mesoam´erica , Judith Aissen and Roberto Zavala, eds. CIESAS, Mexico City. · 1976, Harvard studies in syntax and semantics II, Judith Aissen and Jorge Hankamer, eds. Harvard Linguistics Department, Cambridge, MA. Articles in professional journals · to appear (2021), with Telma Can Pixabaj. Nominalization and the expression of manner in K'iche'. International Journal of American Linguistics 87(1). · to appear. Documenting topic and focus. Language Documentation & Conservation. · 2004, with Joan Bresnan. Remarks on explanation and description in grammar. Studies in Language 28:580-283. · 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21:435-483. · 2002, with Joan Bresnan. Optimality and functionality: Objections and refutations. Nat- ural Language & Linguistic Theory 20:81-95. · 1999. Subject choice and markedness in Optimality Theory, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17:673-711. · 1999. Inverse and agent focus in Tzotzil. Language 75:451-485. · 1997. On the syntax of obviation. Language 73:705-750. · 1996. Pied piping, abstract agreement, and functional projections in Tzotzil. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14:447-491. · 1994. Tzotzil auxiliaries. Linguistics 32:657-690. · 1992. Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 68:43-80. · 1989. Agreement controllers and Tzotzil comitatives. Language 65:518-536. · 1974. Verb raising. Linguistic Inquiry 5:325-366. · 1972, with Jorge Hankamer. Shifty subjects: A conspiracy in syntax? Linguistic Inquiry 3:501-504. · 1970, with John Kimball. \I think, you think, he think". Linguistic Inquiry 2:241-246. Chapters in books · to appear (2020), with Gilles Polian. Headless relative clauses in Tseltalan. Headless Rela- tive Clauses in Mesoamerican Languages, Ivano Caponigro, Harold Torrence, and Roberto Zavala, eds. Oxford University Press. · 2017. Correlates of ergativity in Mayan. OUP Linguistics Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, and Lisa Travis, eds. Oxford University Press. 3 August 27, 2020 · 2017. Complementation in Mayan. The Mayan Languages, Judith Aissen, Nora England, and Roberto Zavala, eds. Routledge. · 2017. Information structure in Mayan. The Mayan Languages, Judith Aissen, Nora Eng- land, and Roberto Zavala, eds. Routledge. · 2017. Agent focus and passive in Tsotsil. Asking the right questions: Essays in honor of Sandra Chung. Jason Ostrove, Ruth Kramer, and Joseph Sabbagh, eds. UC Santa Cruz. 139-157. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8255v8sc · 2017. Special clitics and the right periphery in Tsotsil, On looking into words (and beyond). Claire Bowern, Laurence Horn, and Raffaella Zanuttini, eds. Language Science Press. · 2011. On the syntax of agent focus in K'ichee', Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Mayan Linguistics, Kirill Shklovsky, Pedro Mateo Pedro, and Jessica Coon, eds. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics Vol 63, 1-16. Cambridge, MA: MITPL. · 2010, with Roberto Zavala. Introducci´on. La predicaci´onsecundaria en lenguas de mesoam´erica, Judith Aissen and Roberto Zavala, eds. CIESAS, Mexico City. · 2009. Depictives and serialization in Tzotzil. Hypothesis A/Hypothesis B: Linguistic Ex- plorations in Honor of David M. Perlmutter. Donna B. Gerdts, John Moore, and Maria Polinsky, eds. MIT Press, 1-17. · 2004. Differential coding, partial blocking, and bidirectional OT. BLS 29, Pawel Nowak and Corey Yoquelet, eds. · 2001. Subject choice and markedness in Optimality Theory. Optimality- theoretic syntax, Jane Grimshaw, Geraldine Legendre, and Sten Vikner, eds. MIT Press, 61-96, [reprinted]. · 2000. yi and bi: Proximate and obviative in Navajo. Papers in Honor of Ken Hale. Endangered and Less Familiar Languages Working Papers 1, Andrew Carnie, Eloise Jelinek, and MaryAnn Willie, eds. MITWPL, 129-150. · 2000. Prosodic conditions on clitics and anaphora in Jakaltek. The Syntax of Verb-Initial Languages, Andrew Carney and Eithne Guilfoyle, eds. Oxford University Press, 185-200. · 1999. Logical subject and external possessor in Tzutujil, External Possession, D. Payne and I. Barshi, eds, John Benjamins, 167-193. · 1991. Relational grammar. Trends in Present Day Linguistics, Flip Droste, ed. John Benjamins, 63-102. · 1990. Toward a theory of agreement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Structure of a Specific Language: the Mayan Family Instructor Content Of
    Structure of a Specific Language: The Mayan Family LING 410 — Fall 2016 T/Th 10:05–11:25, Linguistics 002 Instructor Jessica Coon email [email protected] office 1085 Dr. Penfield, 221 office hours W 14:00–15:30 or by appointment Content of the course This course is an in-depth investigation of the structure of a language (or language family) other than English. This year we will examine various aspects of the structure of languages of the Mayan family within the framework of generative linguistics. We will cover a range of topics in phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics. While we will look at specific puzzles found within Mayan linguistics, we will do so with an eye toward their relevance to linguistic theory more generally. Throughout the semester, we will bear the following questions in mind: Do existing linguistic theories extend readily to language of the Mayan family? How does an in depth investigation into Mayan provide us with tools to tackle bigger problems in the field? How do Mayan languages inform our ideas about Universal Grammar? Requirements and evaluation We will investigate the above topics through a combination of readings (both specific to the Mayan family, as well as general readings on the topics we are covering); class presentations (some led by me, others led by you); in-class and take-home datasets (created both by me and by you); as well as short writing assignments. Group work and in-class participation will be essential to successful completion of the course. short assignments 50% (10 x 5% each) final project 30% (paper = 25%; presentation = 5%) article presentation 10% course participation 10% Readings The readings will all be listed on the MyCourses website, either as directly-downloadable articles, or as links to the McGill library website.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Bibliography
    Bibliography Bibliography Abney, Steven Paul, 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. Ara, Fray Domingo de, 1571 (1986). Bocabulario de lengua tzeldal según el orden de Copanabastla, Mario Humberto Ruz, editor. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Aissen, Judith, 1987. Tzotzil Clause Structure. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Aissen, Judith, 1992. Topic and Focus in Mayan. Language 68(1). Aissen, Judith, 1994. Tzotzil Auxiliaries. Linguistics 32. Aissen, Judith, 1997. On the Syntax of Obviation. Language 73(4). Alexiadou, Artemis, 1997. Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetic Syntax. Amsteram: John Benjamins. Alexiadou, Artemis, 2001. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Allen, W. Sidney, 1964. Transitivity and Possession. Language 40(3). Attinasi, John J., 1973. Lak T’an: A Grammar of the Chol (Mayan) Word. PhD Thesis, University of Chicago. Aulie, Wilbur, and Aulie, Evelin, 1978. Diccionario Ch’ol-Español, Español-Ch’ol. México: Instituto Linguístico de Verano. Baker, Mark, 1985. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Baker, Mark, 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Baker, Mark C., 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press. Baker, Mark C., 1997. Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure in “Elements of Grammar,” Liliane Haegeman, editor. Dordrecht; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers. Baker, Mark C., 2001. The Nature of Non-Configurationality in “The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory,” Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, editors. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. Bittner, Maria and Hale, Ken, 1996a. The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27.1 Bibliography Bittner, Maria and Hale, Ken, 1996b.
    [Show full text]
  • Chol Ritual Language with Terrence Lee Folmar, Heidi Altman, Ausencio Cruz Guzmán, and Bernardo Pérez Martínez ©1996 J
    FAMSI © 2001: J. Kathryn Josserand and Nicholas A. Hopkins Chol Ritual Language with Terrence Lee Folmar, Heidi Altman, Ausencio Cruz Guzmán, and Bernardo Pérez Martínez ©1996 J. Kathryn Josserand and Nicholas A. Hopkins Research Year : 1995 Culture : Chol Maya Chronology : Classic Location : Southern México, Belize, and Guatemala Site : Tila Table of Contents Chols and the Chol Language The Linguistic Affiliation of Chol History and Cultural Relations Chol Settlements Economy of the Chol Region Kinship and Family Contemporary Chol Sociopolitical Organization Religion and Ritual Activity The Ritual Vocabulary of Tila Chol The Contexts of Ritual Language Use The Black Christ of Tila The Tila Cargo System The Ceremonial Calendar Research on Chol Ritual Vocabulary, 1995 Preparations Field Work during Summer, 1995 Additional Activities Assessment of the Field Situation, 1995 Lexical Sets in Tila’s Ritual Vocabulary Terms for Ceremonial Office Cargoholders and Related Statuses Other Named Statuses and Titles The Lexicon of the Sacred Towards a Theory of Chol Religion Offering-focused Behavior Curing Concluding Remarks Sources Cited Appendix I. The Lexicon of Ritual Activity in Tila Chol Chol-Spanish-English Lexicon Appendix II. Tila Chol Text Santa Cruz, The Feast of the Holy Cross Appendix III. Chol Bird Names Preliminary Ethno-Classification of Chol Birds The material presented in this monograph is based in part on research supported by the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. (Project 1994.018), the Council for Faculty Research Support, Florida State University, the National Endowment for the Humanities (Grant RT-20643-86), and the National Science Foundation (Grant BNS 8520749). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAMSI, COFRS, FSU, NEH, or NSF.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexican Philosophical Thought on Race and Revolution
    Copyright By Elías Medina 2019 The Cosmic Race, Decolonization, and Neo-Zapatismo: Mexican Philosophical Thought on Race and Revolution By Elías Medina, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History California State University Bakersfield In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of Master of Arts in History 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my professor and mentor, Dr. Stephen Allen, for guiding me throughout this two-year project. I owe my research and organization strategies to him. Likewise, I thank my other two mentors, Dr. Kate Mulry and Dr. Cliona Murphy, for taking a look at my work before its submission. I would also like to thank Octavio Barajas for directing me to some of the most crucial sources that I relied on for this project. I thank him for our discussions, which inspired some of my best ideas. I thank Miguel Cuate Jr. for helping me edit this paper. I am grateful for his time and his feedback. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, Manuel and Alma Medina, for their patience and encouragement, not just throughout this endeavor, but throughout my academic career. ABSTRACT This thesis project will argue that the participation of indigenous Mexicans in the Revolution of 1910 and the EZLN uprising of 1994 forced José Vasconcelos, Leopoldo Zea, and Enrique Dussel to reflect on the legacies of Mexico’s colonial past in order to propose how such peoples would form a part of modern Mexican society and identity. Vasconcelos proposed the idea of the cosmic race to encourage indigenous assimilation. Although Zea was a decolonial thinker, he too encouraged indigenous assimilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Modality in the Grammar of Modern Mayan Languages
    Modality in the Grammar of Modern Mayan Languages Igor Vinogradov This paper presents a first attempt of a comparative study of expression of modal meanings in the grammar of modern Mayan languages. There is no separate category of tense in the grammar of almost all modern Mayan languages; so modality along with aspect are main semantic domains expressed by the verbal grammar. This paper is dedicated to the study of grammatical means used to express modal meanings in the Mayan languages, as well as the distribution of these means. Particular attention will be focused on the categories of imperative and irrealis. Keywords: grammar, imperative, irrealis, Mayan languages, modality 1 Introduction The Mayan family is one of the most closely studied language families of Central America. The main reason for that is quite simple: these languages have been attracting scientists’ attention for a long time due to the hieroglyphic writing on steles, monuments, pottery of ancient times. Historical interest called forth linguistic interest, but Mayan writing system resisted decryption attempts for a long time. Only in the middle of the 20th century Russian scientist Yuri Knorosov reached some success. But the interest, the Mayan languages presented, did not fade away ever since, quite the contrary, it has considerably increased. The linguists obtained the rare opportunity to observe the development of language family in the diachrony. The comparative, historical and typological studies of different linguistic fields are appearing constantly. One of them, dedicated to the expression of modal meanings in the grammar of modern Mayan languages, is presented in this paper. It should be considered a first step in the comparative and typological study of modality in Mayan languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosody in Mesoamerican Languages
    1 Prosody in Mesoamerican Languages 2 Christian DiCanio and Ryan Bennett 3 Abstract 4 The Mesoamerican linguistic area is rich with prosodic phenomena, including a wide va- 5 riety of complex tone, phonation, stress, and intonational systems. The diversity of prosodic 6 patterns in Mesoamerica reflects the extreme time-depth and complex history of the languages 7 spoken there. This chapter surveys the prosody of Mesoamerican languages and some past 8 analyses of their structures. Topics include the areal distribution of tonal complexity; interac- 9 tions between stress, tone, and segmental contrasts; the phonetics of tone and phonation; met- 10 rical structure; and higher-level prosodic phenomena. Case studies from different languages 11 also highlight interactions between morphological and word-prosodic structure. These top- 12 ics underscore the importance of research on Mesoamerican languages to both phonological 13 theory and linguistic typology. 14 1 Introduction 15 Mesoamerica spans from Northern-Central Mexico to Costa Rica. Several unrelated language 16 families occupy this territory, including the Oto-Manguean, Mayan, and Totozoquean families 17 (Brown et al. 2011), and a few language isolates, e.g. Huave (Kim 2008), Xinca (Rogers 2010), and 18 Tarascan (Purépecha) (Friedrich 1975). Although the Uto-Aztecan languages Nahuatl and Pipil are 19 spoken in Mesoamerica—in close contact, for centuries, with other Mesoamerican languages— 1 20 they are not generally considered part of the Mesoamerican linguistic area (Campbell et al. 1986). 21 The same is true for for the Chibchan and Misumalpan families. This chapter focuses on word- 22 prosody within the Mesoamerican area and, to a lesser extent, prosodic structure above the word.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Language Use in Ozelonacaxtla, Puebla, Mexico
    Vol. 13 (2019), pp. 112–154 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24850 Revised Version Received: 17 Jan 2019 Interpreting language use in Ozelonacaxtla, Puebla, Mexico Rachel McGraw University of Alberta, Department of Linguistics Despite sharing many cultural, historical, and socioeconomic characteristics, To- tonac communities have markedly distinct language use patterns and practices. Some communities have adopted the mainstream hegemonic discourse in Mexico that denigrates indigeneity and subsequently abandoned Totonac (Lam 2009). In other communities, such as Ozelonacaxtla, an alternate discourse dominates that values multilingualism, and Totonac is widely spoken by the vast majority of the community. This variation across Totonac communities facing the same broad pressures to shift to Spanish demonstrates that current sociodemographic models of language shift lack significant predictive power. By examining not only so- ciodemographic factors, but also language ideology, this study seeks to determine whether and how language use in Ozeloancaxtla is qualitatively different in na- ture from other Totonac communities. Interpreting language use in Ozelonacaxtla is undertaken in the methodology of qualitative linguistic ethnography (Copland & Creese 2015). Results show that Ozelonacaxtla Totonac is currently used in almost all community and home domains; however some threats to continued sustainability are recognized. Three main language ideologies in Ozelonacaxtla are identified: (i) language is an index of identity, (ii) language is important/useful, and (iii) Totonac should not be lost. These main discourses are used by speakers to explain, justify, and contest language use patterns and practices, and significant differences in ideology are found across Totonac communities with contrasting language use. This demonstrates the importance of examining ideology in order to accurately interpret language use and best position potential efforts to support language sustainability, documentation, and revitalization.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Voice and Valence in Q'anjob'al Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mk3j9sr Author Acker, Ann Michelle Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Voice and Valence in Q’anjob’al A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics by Ann Michelle Acker 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Voice and Valence in Q’anjob’al by Ann Michelle Acker Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Pamela Munro, Chair Grammatical voice is the thematic relationship between a verb and its arguments; for example, a transitive active verb has an agent subject and a patient object, while a passive verb has a patient subject. As an ergative language with frequent use of passive voice and a relatively rare antipassive, the Mayan language Q’anjob’al offers evidence against the typological claim that ergative languages tend to use antipassive more productively than passive. In addition to passive and antipassive, Q’anjob’al argument structure can be affected by agent focus and incorporating morphology. While these operations typically do not involve a change in the number of participants, unlike passive and antipassive, they do alter the syntactic realization of the participants and act as discourse strategies to highlight or background entities. I propose that the non-canonical alignment of the transitive agent with absolutive agreement seen in antipassive and incorporating constructions is highly marked, accounting for their relative rarity.
    [Show full text]
  • How Indigenous-Language Court Interpreters and Clients Navigate the U.S
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College Spring 2021 How Indigenous-Language Court Interpreters and Clients Navigate the U.S. Court System Under Strict Court-Interpreting Guidelines Ashten Lehwalder Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Part of the Applied Linguistics Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Lehwalder, Ashten, "How Indigenous-Language Court Interpreters and Clients Navigate the U.S. Court System Under Strict Court-Interpreting Guidelines" (2021). University Honors Theses. Paper 1119. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.1150 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. How Indigenous-Language Court Interpreters and Clients Navigate the U.S. Court System Under Strict Court-Interpreting Guidelines by Ashten Lehwalder A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in University Honors and Applied Linguistics Thesis Adviser Alissa Hartig Ph.D. Portland State University 2021 1. Background For those with limited English proficiency (LEP), interpreters are an invaluable resource, and the U.S. has laws dictating the protection of LEP individuals. Executive Order 13166, “Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency," mandates that discrimination on the basis of national origin (and, by extension, language ability) is a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and also orders Federal agencies to “ensure that the programs and activities they normally provide in English are accessible to LEP person[s]” (Exec.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Mayan Linguistics
    Language and Linguistics Compass (2015): 1–14, 10.1111/lnc3.12159 Introduction to Mayan Linguistics Ryan Bennett*,JessicaCoon* and Robert Henderson* Yale University, McGill University, and University of Arizona 1. Introduction This special issue of Language and Linguistic Compass is dedicated to a three-part survey of the grammatical structure of Mayan languages. The articles in this collection focus on core, well- studied aspects of Mayan linguistics: phonology (Bennett), syntax (Coon), and semantics (Henderson). The perspective taken is broadly typological, but also informed by theoretical issues in formal linguistics. Our goal is to share the richness of Mayan languages with the broader linguistic community, in the hopes of encouraging future research on these fascinating languages. This introduction includes an overview of the Mayan language family and its internal struc- ture (Section 2), as well as a discussion of the kinds of publications that we’ve drawn on in com- piling the target articles (Section 3). We close with an outline of the glossing and transcription conventions that we’ve adopted for this special issue (Section 4). 2. Genetic Classification and Language Names 2.1. THE REGION AND SPEAKERS Mayan languages are spoken by over 6million people across Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, and Honduras, as well as in various diaspora communities in the United States and Canada. The Maya area is divided into two geographical regions, the Highland and Lowland areas, with the boundary falling roughly along the chain of mountains that runs through central Guatemala (Figure 1; see Law 2014 for discussion). Guatemala has the highest density of Mayan speakers of any country today.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Testament in Tzotzil Is Released in Mexico
    The New Testament in Tzotzil Is Released in Mexico http://www.jw.org/en/news/releases/by-region/mexico/new-testament-in-... Jehovah’s Witnesses APRIL 24, 2015 MEXICO The New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures in Tzotzil Is Released in Mexico MEXICO CITY—Jehovah’s Witnesses released the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures in Tzotzil at a convention held December 26-28, 2014, in Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas. The “Keep Seeking First God’s Kingdom!” Regional Convention was presented in Tzotzil, a Mayan language, and was transmitted to another venue in Comitan, Chiapas. In addition to the Bible, all 5,073 in attendance received six more new publications in Tzotzil. A spokesman for Jehovah’s Witnesses in Mexico, Gamaliel Camarillo, states: “We are thrilled with the release of the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures in Tzotzil. We look Geoffrey Jackson, a member of the forward to sharing this translation with our Tzotzil- Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses, speaking neighbors.” releases the New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures in Tzotzil. He is wearing a Jerkil, a traditional Tzotzil vest 1 of 2 4/24/2015 7:22 PM The New Testament in Tzotzil Is Released in Mexico http://www.jw.org/en/news/releases/by-region/mexico/new-testament-in-... made of wool. Tzotzil-speaking Witnesses using the newly released New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures at the convention in Chiapas, Mexico. The Tzotzil language is spoken by over 350,000 people in Baja California, Campeche, Chiapas, Oaxaca, and Veracruz, according to the Secretariat of Public Education for Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • *‡Table 6. Languages
    T6 Table[6.[Languages T6 T6 DeweyT6iDecima Tablel[iClassification6.[Languages T6 *‡Table 6. Languages The following notation is never used alone, but may be used with those numbers from the schedules and other tables to which the classifier is instructed to add notation from Table 6, e.g., translations of the Bible (220.5) into Dutch (—3931 in this table): 220.53931; regions (notation —175 from Table 2) where Spanish language (—61 in this table) predominates: Table 2 notation 17561. When adding to a number from the schedules, always insert a decimal point between the third and fourth digits of the complete number Unless there is specific provision for the old or middle form of a modern language, class these forms with the modern language, e.g., Old High German —31, but Old English —29 Unless there is specific provision for a dialect of a language, class the dialect with the language, e.g., American English dialects —21, but Swiss-German dialect —35 Unless there is a specific provision for a pidgin, creole, or mixed language, class it with the source language from which more of its vocabulary comes than from its other source language(s), e.g., Crioulo language —69, but Papiamento —68. If in doubt, prefer the language coming last in Table 6, e.g., Michif —97323 (not —41) The numbers in this table do not necessarily correspond exactly to the numbers used for individual languages in 420–490 and in 810–890. For example, although the base number for English in 420–490 is 42, the number for English in Table 6 is —21, not —2 (Option A: To give local emphasis and a shorter number to a specific language, place it first by use of a letter or other symbol, e.g., Arabic language 6_A [preceding 6_1].
    [Show full text]