DOCSLIB.ORG

UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Voice and Valence in Q'anjob'al Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4mk3j9sr Author Acker, Ann Michelle Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Voice and Valence in Q’anjob’al A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics by Ann Michelle Acker 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Voice and Valence in Q’anjob’al by Ann Michelle Acker Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Los Angeles, 2016 Professor Pamela Munro, Chair Grammatical voice is the thematic relationship between a verb and its arguments; for example, a transitive active verb has an agent subject and a patient object, while a passive verb has a patient subject. As an ergative language with frequent use of passive voice and a relatively rare antipassive, the Mayan language Q’anjob’al offers evidence against the typological claim that ergative languages tend to use antipassive more productively than passive. In addition to passive and antipassive, Q’anjob’al argument structure can be affected by agent focus and incorporating morphology. While these operations typically do not involve a change in the number of participants, unlike passive and antipassive, they do alter the syntactic realization of the participants and act as discourse strategies to highlight or background entities. I propose that the non-canonical alignment of the transitive agent with absolutive agreement seen in antipassive and incorporating constructions is highly marked, accounting for their relative rarity. Passive voice is used in Q'anjob'al when the semantic patient outranks the agent in proximity, a dimension encompassing animacy, definiteness, and discourse ii prominance. Assigning a structurally superior argument position to a less prominant argument than the internal argument in a transitive sentence is also marked, resulting in the preference for passive structures in such cases. Incorporation, in which a transitive verb and its object combine to form an intransitive verb, is another option in Q'anjob'al to background the patient, an alternative to antipassive and agent focus. Q'anjob'al incorporation appears to involve a piece of structure larger than the nominal head often assumed to be involved in incorporation, as modification of the incorporated nominal by adjectives and conjunction is possible. Like antipassive, incorporation aligns the transitive agent with absolutive agreement and is relatively rare; however, incorporation differs from antipassive in that it never changes the meaning of the verb root, has no lexical restrictions, and usually does not occur with the omission of an argument. Agent focus, a construction attested in many Mayan languages in which the verb takes special morphology when the subject of a transitive clause is focused, is an alternative strategy when the patient is more proximate than the agent. Though Q'anjob'al agent focus has sometimes been described as a type of antipassive, it differs from antipassive in that there is no case shift and no reduction in valence. The syntax of agent focus is best represented as a biclausal structure with a null copula in the matrix clause. Passive and agent focus are less marked in Q'anjob'al, and therefore occur more frequently, than antipassive and incorporation because of the following features they share: preservation of the structural position of the internal argument, canonical alignment of the patient argument with absolutive case, no restrictions on the transitive verbs on which they may appear, and no unpredictable changes in meaning. iii The dissertation of Ann Michelle Acker is approved. Edward Keenan Robert Kirsner Jessica Rett Harold Torrence Pamela Munro, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2016 iv Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... ii Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................... ix List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ xi List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. xii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... xiii Curriculum Vitae ...................................................................................................................... xvii Chapter 1: Background: ergativity, valence, and voice 1.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Ergativity, valence, and voice ..............................................................................................2 1.3 Roadmap of the dissertation.................................................................................................7 1.4 Literature background ..........................................................................................................8 Chapter 2: An Overview of Q’anjob’al 2.1 Language and fieldwork background .................................................................................11 2.2 Orthography .......................................................................................................................11 2.3 Genetic background ...........................................................................................................13 2.4 Q’anjob’al grammar ...........................................................................................................13 2.4.1 Ergativity and pronominal agreement in Q’anjob’al ................................................13 2.4.2 Q’anjob’al verbs.....................................................................................................15 2.4.2.1 Directionals ................................................................................................17 2.4.2.2 Status markers ............................................................................................18 2.4.2.3 Stative predicates .......................................................................................19 2.4.2.4 Progressive Constructions ..........................................................................21 v 2.4.3 Q’anjob’al nouns .......................................................................................................22 2.4.4 Q’anjob’al prepositions .............................................................................................25 2.4.5 Causative constructions ............................................................................................27 2.4.6 Imperative constructions ...........................................................................................29 Chapter 3: Q’anjob’al valence alternations 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................31 3.2 Basic word order and syntax ..............................................................................................31 3.2.1 Mayan VSO as innovation .....................................................................................32 3.2.2 Flat structure analyses ............................................................................................33 3.2.3 VSO as underlying SVO ........................................................................................35 3.3 Voice and valence alternations ..........................................................................................36 3.3.1 Passive voice ..........................................................................................................37 3.3.1.1 Passives with -lay .......................................................................................38 3.3.1.2 Passives with -chaj .....................................................................................38 3.3.2 Antipassive voice ...................................................................................................40 3.3.3 Incorporation ..........................................................................................................42 3.3.4 Agent Focus constructions .....................................................................................43 Chapter 4: Passive and antipassive voice 4.1 Ergativity and voice alternations .......................................................................................46 4.2 Voice morphology in Q’anjob’al .......................................................................................48 4.3 Q’anjob’al passives and antipassives .................................................................................48 4.3.1 Passives ..................................................................................................................48 4.3.1.1 Passives with -lay .......................................................................................49 vi 4.3.1.2 Passives with -chaj .....................................................................................49 4.3.2 Antipassives ...........................................................................................................54
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphological Causatives Are Voice Over Voice
    Morphological causatives are Voice over Voice Yining Nie New York University Abstract Causative morphology has been associated with either the introduction of an event of causation or the introduction of a causer argument. However, morphological causatives are mono-eventive, casting doubt on the notion that causatives fundamentally add a causing event. On the other hand, in some languages the causative morpheme is closer to the verb root than would be expected if the causative head is responsible for introducing the causer. Drawing on evidence primarily from Tagalog and Halkomelem, I argue that the syntactic configuration for morphological causatives involves Voice over Voice, and that languages differ in whether their ‘causative marker’ spells out the higher Voice, the lower Voice or both. Keywords: causative, Voice, argument structure, morpheme order, typology, Tagalog 1. Introduction Syntactic approaches to causatives generally fall into one of two camps. The first view builds on the discovery that causatives may semantically consist of multiple (sub)events (Jackendoff 1972, Dowty 1979, Parsons 1990, Levin & Rappaport Hovav 1994, a.o.). Consider the following English causative–anticausative pair. The anticausative in (1a) consists of an event of change of state, schematised in (1b). The causative in (2a) involves the same change of state plus an additional layer of semantics that conveys how that change of state is brought about (2b). (1) a. The stick broke. b. [ BECOME [ stick STATE(broken) ]] (2) a. Pat broke the stick. b. [ Pat CAUSE [ BECOME [ stick STATE(broken) ]]] Word Structure 13.1 (2020): 102–126 DOI: 10.3366/word.2020.0161 © Edinburgh University Press www.euppublishing.com/word MORPHOLOGICAL CAUSATIVES ARE VOICE OVER VOICE 103 Several linguists have proposed that the semantic CAUSE and BECOME components of the causative are encoded as independent lexical verbal heads in the syntax (Harley 1995, Cuervo 2003, Folli & Harley 2005, Pylkkänen 2008, a.o.).
    [Show full text]
  • Typological Studies with Passive/Antipassive As an Example
    Typological studies with passive/antipassive as an example Irina Burukina [email protected] *** . Irina Burukina ([email protected])Typological studies with passive/antipassive as an example *** 1 / 53 This lecture is about 1. Typology What is linguistic typology 2. Examples of linguistic typologies Word order typology Morphological typology Morphosyntactic typology: Nominative vs. ergative languages 3. Voices from a typological perspective Voice Passive Antipassive . Irina Burukina ([email protected])Typological studies with passive/antipassive as an example *** 2 / 53 What is linguistic typology . Irina Burukina ([email protected])Typological studies with passive/antipassive as an example *** 3 / 53 References The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. 2010. edited by Jae Jung Song Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2012. Languages of the World. An Introduction. Croft, William. 1990, 2003. Typology and Universals. Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS) – https://wals.info/ . Irina Burukina ([email protected])Typological studies with passive/antipassive as an example *** 4 / 53 Linguistic typology Comparative study of human languages: Comparing languages with each other with respect to a given linguistic phenomenon. Classifying observed crosslinguistic variation into types. Formulating generalizations over the distribution of linguistic patterns across the languages of the world and their relationship to other patterns. – universals and parameters . Irina Burukina ([email protected])Typological studies with passive/antipassive as an example *** 5 / 53 Greenberg’s universals Greenberg (1963): What is possible/impossible in human language? Why? Examples of Greenberg’s universals: All languages with dominant VSO order have SVO as an alternative or as the only alternative basic order.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of a Specific Language: the Mayan Family Instructor Content Of
    Structure of a Specific Language: The Mayan Family LING 410 — Fall 2016 T/Th 10:05–11:25, Linguistics 002 Instructor Jessica Coon email [email protected] office 1085 Dr. Penfield, 221 office hours W 14:00–15:30 or by appointment Content of the course This course is an in-depth investigation of the structure of a language (or language family) other than English. This year we will examine various aspects of the structure of languages of the Mayan family within the framework of generative linguistics. We will cover a range of topics in phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics. While we will look at specific puzzles found within Mayan linguistics, we will do so with an eye toward their relevance to linguistic theory more generally. Throughout the semester, we will bear the following questions in mind: Do existing linguistic theories extend readily to language of the Mayan family? How does an in depth investigation into Mayan provide us with tools to tackle bigger problems in the field? How do Mayan languages inform our ideas about Universal Grammar? Requirements and evaluation We will investigate the above topics through a combination of readings (both specific to the Mayan family, as well as general readings on the topics we are covering); class presentations (some led by me, others led by you); in-class and take-home datasets (created both by me and by you); as well as short writing assignments. Group work and in-class participation will be essential to successful completion of the course. short assignments 50% (10 x 5% each) final project 30% (paper = 25%; presentation = 5%) article presentation 10% course participation 10% Readings The readings will all be listed on the MyCourses website, either as directly-downloadable articles, or as links to the McGill library website.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Bibliography
    Bibliography Bibliography Abney, Steven Paul, 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. Ara, Fray Domingo de, 1571 (1986). Bocabulario de lengua tzeldal según el orden de Copanabastla, Mario Humberto Ruz, editor. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Aissen, Judith, 1987. Tzotzil Clause Structure. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Aissen, Judith, 1992. Topic and Focus in Mayan. Language 68(1). Aissen, Judith, 1994. Tzotzil Auxiliaries. Linguistics 32. Aissen, Judith, 1997. On the Syntax of Obviation. Language 73(4). Alexiadou, Artemis, 1997. Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetic Syntax. Amsteram: John Benjamins. Alexiadou, Artemis, 2001. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Allen, W. Sidney, 1964. Transitivity and Possession. Language 40(3). Attinasi, John J., 1973. Lak T’an: A Grammar of the Chol (Mayan) Word. PhD Thesis, University of Chicago. Aulie, Wilbur, and Aulie, Evelin, 1978. Diccionario Ch’ol-Español, Español-Ch’ol. México: Instituto Linguístico de Verano. Baker, Mark, 1985. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Baker, Mark, 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Baker, Mark C., 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press. Baker, Mark C., 1997. Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure in “Elements of Grammar,” Liliane Haegeman, editor. Dordrecht; Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers. Baker, Mark C., 2001. The Nature of Non-Configurationality in “The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory,” Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, editors. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. Bittner, Maria and Hale, Ken, 1996a. The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27.1 Bibliography Bittner, Maria and Hale, Ken, 1996b.
    [Show full text]
  • Derived Ergative in Ixil
    Derived Ergative in Ixil Yusuke Imanishi 1. Introduction In this paper, I will argue that a subset of derived subjects (particularly the unaccusative subject) is allowed to receive ergative Case, contra the widely accepted generalization that derived subjects such as the subject of unaccusatives and passives are not marked with ergative (Marantz, 1991).1 To illustrate this, I will investigate the interaction between Case alignment and instrumental voice constructions (hereafter IVCs) in Ixil (Mayan) (Dayley, 1981; Ayres, 1983, 1991). In particular, I will address the unexpected emergence of the ergative in a subcase of IVCs: unergatives and unaccusatives. This occurs when an instrumental phrase is fronted to clause-initial position. I will claim that the fronted instrumental phrase feeds the assignment of ergative Case, adopting a recent phase-based analysis of dependent ergative case (Baker, 2014, 2015). As will be shown, the ergative found in unaccusatives and unergatives as well as the regular ergative of Ixil can be analyzed as “dependent” ergative under this analysis. 2. The instrumental voice construction in Ixil Ixil, a member of the Mamean branch of the Mayan languages, is spoken by about 50,000- 69,000 speakers in the Guatemalan Highlands (Lengyel 1978, Ayres 1981 cf. Elliott 1961).2 Like other Mayan languages, Ixil is a head-marking ergative language in the sense of Nichols (1986). Grammatical relations are cross-referenced, with ergative alignment, by agreement morphemes that appear on the predicate. The ergative and absolutive morphemes are called set A and set B markers, respectively, in Mayan linguistics. Set A markers cross-reference transitive subjects and possessors: the homophony between ergative and genitive can be found across Mayan languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Chol Ritual Language with Terrence Lee Folmar, Heidi Altman, Ausencio Cruz Guzmán, and Bernardo Pérez Martínez ©1996 J
    FAMSI © 2001: J. Kathryn Josserand and Nicholas A. Hopkins Chol Ritual Language with Terrence Lee Folmar, Heidi Altman, Ausencio Cruz Guzmán, and Bernardo Pérez Martínez ©1996 J. Kathryn Josserand and Nicholas A. Hopkins Research Year : 1995 Culture : Chol Maya Chronology : Classic Location : Southern México, Belize, and Guatemala Site : Tila Table of Contents Chols and the Chol Language The Linguistic Affiliation of Chol History and Cultural Relations Chol Settlements Economy of the Chol Region Kinship and Family Contemporary Chol Sociopolitical Organization Religion and Ritual Activity The Ritual Vocabulary of Tila Chol The Contexts of Ritual Language Use The Black Christ of Tila The Tila Cargo System The Ceremonial Calendar Research on Chol Ritual Vocabulary, 1995 Preparations Field Work during Summer, 1995 Additional Activities Assessment of the Field Situation, 1995 Lexical Sets in Tila’s Ritual Vocabulary Terms for Ceremonial Office Cargoholders and Related Statuses Other Named Statuses and Titles The Lexicon of the Sacred Towards a Theory of Chol Religion Offering-focused Behavior Curing Concluding Remarks Sources Cited Appendix I. The Lexicon of Ritual Activity in Tila Chol Chol-Spanish-English Lexicon Appendix II. Tila Chol Text Santa Cruz, The Feast of the Holy Cross Appendix III. Chol Bird Names Preliminary Ethno-Classification of Chol Birds The material presented in this monograph is based in part on research supported by the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. (Project 1994.018), the Council for Faculty Research Support, Florida State University, the National Endowment for the Humanities (Grant RT-20643-86), and the National Science Foundation (Grant BNS 8520749). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAMSI, COFRS, FSU, NEH, or NSF.
    [Show full text]
  • A Radical Construction Grammar Analysis of Antipassive Constructions Meagan Vigus
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Linguistics ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-1-2016 A Radical Construction Grammar Analysis of Antipassive Constructions Meagan Vigus Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds Recommended Citation Vigus, Meagan. "A Radical Construction Grammar Analysis of Antipassive Constructions." (2016). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds/39 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Meagan Vigus Candidate Linguistics Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Thesis Committee: Dr. William Croft, Chair Dr. Melissa Axelrod, Member Dr. Rosa Vallejos-Yopan, Member A Radical Construction Grammar Analysis of Antipassive Constructions by Meagan Vigus B.A., Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2014 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Linguistics The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico May, 2016 Dedication To my parents, for their unwavering and enthusiastic support every step of the way ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my adviser, Dr. Croft, for his invaluable guidance and support during this research project. I would also like to thank Dr. Axelrod and Dr. Vallejos-Yopan for their insightful comments and suggestions. I would also like to acknowledge Dr. Laura Robinson, who introduced me to linguistic research and Philippine voice systems, which has led me to this topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Voice in Bugis: an Rrg Perspective
    VOICE IN BUGIS: AN RRG PERSPECTIVE by Douglas C. Laskowske Bachelor of Arts, Taylor University, 2011 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Grand Forks, North Dakota August 2016 This thesis, submitted by Douglas Laskowske in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts from the University of North Dakota, has been read by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whom the work has been done and is hereby approved. ______________________________________ James Roberts, Chairperson ______________________________________ Janet Allen, Committee member ______________________________________ Adam Baker, Committee member ______________________________________ , ______________________________________ , This thesis is being submitted by the appointed advisory committee as having met all of the requirements of the School of Graduate Studies at the University of North Dakota and is hereby approved. __________________________________ Dr. Grant McGimpsey Dean of the School of Graduate Studies __________________________________ Date July 6, 2016 ii PERMISSION Title Voice in Bugis: An RRG Perspective Department Linguistics Degree MA In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the chairperson of the department or the dean of the School of Graduate Studies. It is understood that any copying or publication or other use of this dissertation or part thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Grammar in the Script Passives, Medio-Passives
    GRAMMAR IN THE SCRIPT PASSIVES, MEDIO-PASSIVES, AND ANTIPASSIVES by Hutch Kinsman This is the third article in a series designed to allow the non-linguist to analyze verbs in the hieroglyphic script. Highlights of previous articles include the fact that the script follows the rules of ergative/absolutive languages as opposed to the familiar nominative/accusative languages. The verbal analyis chart included in the first article (Kinsman, 2007:40) should be referred to throughout the current and future articles. Table 2.1, Hieroglyphic Script Root CVC Transitive Verbs (Kinsman 2008:31) should also be available for reference. Discussion will focus on the use of passive, medio-passive, and antipassive constructions derived from CVC root verbs. It is important to note that all passives, medio-passives and antipassives by definition begin as transitive verbs and are derived by certain suffixes to become intransitive constructions--thus the importance of knowing whether a CVC root verb is transitive or intransitive. For some transitive verb roots found in the script, such as tzutz, ‘to end’, or pul, ‘to burn’, it is not obvious for English speakers that these verbs are transitive, however by noting the affixes that are used with these roots in the script, it becomes apparent to which category each belongs. When linguists refer to passive, medio-passive, and antipassive, they are referring to Voice. “Voice” concerns the relationship between the subject and the predicate. In the active voice we have a transitive verb in the predicate position with a direct object, the set A pronouns marking the subject and the set B pronouns marking the object.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexican Philosophical Thought on Race and Revolution
    Copyright By Elías Medina 2019 The Cosmic Race, Decolonization, and Neo-Zapatismo: Mexican Philosophical Thought on Race and Revolution By Elías Medina, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History California State University Bakersfield In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of Master of Arts in History 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my professor and mentor, Dr. Stephen Allen, for guiding me throughout this two-year project. I owe my research and organization strategies to him. Likewise, I thank my other two mentors, Dr. Kate Mulry and Dr. Cliona Murphy, for taking a look at my work before its submission. I would also like to thank Octavio Barajas for directing me to some of the most crucial sources that I relied on for this project. I thank him for our discussions, which inspired some of my best ideas. I thank Miguel Cuate Jr. for helping me edit this paper. I am grateful for his time and his feedback. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, Manuel and Alma Medina, for their patience and encouragement, not just throughout this endeavor, but throughout my academic career. ABSTRACT This thesis project will argue that the participation of indigenous Mexicans in the Revolution of 1910 and the EZLN uprising of 1994 forced José Vasconcelos, Leopoldo Zea, and Enrique Dussel to reflect on the legacies of Mexico’s colonial past in order to propose how such peoples would form a part of modern Mexican society and identity. Vasconcelos proposed the idea of the cosmic race to encourage indigenous assimilation. Although Zea was a decolonial thinker, he too encouraged indigenous assimilation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Syntactic Ergativity: What, How, and Why?
    Agent Focus in Austronesian Dan Brodkin; SS-Circle Agent Focus in Austronesian Dan Brodkin | SS Circle | January 29 1 Syntactic Ergativity: What, How, and Why? 1.1 The Ergative Extraction Constraint • Many ‘eRgative’ languages: asymmetry in the a’-domain. (1) Mandar (South Sulawesi): The EEC a. Na-ita=aq – For some a’-operations (wh-movement, relativization): 3.eRg-see=1.abs – The internal argument (int) is accessible, but, ‘He saw me’ – The transitive external argument (ext) is not. b. Innai na-ita • The Ergative Extraction Constraint (eec; Aissen 2017). who 3.eRg-see ‘Who did he see?’ – Dixon (1979): Syntactic Ergativity = includes the eec c. *Innai na-ita=aq – Polinsky (2017): Syntactic Ergativity = the eec who 3.eRg-see-1.abs – Yuan (2018): Syntactic Ergativity = int > ext . im: ‘Who saw me?’ 1.2 The Typology of EECs • The eec: not a unitary thing (Deal 2015a) (2) Repairs to the EEC: • The ecosystem of the eec: substantial variation. • Intransitive Morphology: W. Austronesian (Keenan 1976); Mayan – Sometimes: the eec = a single constraint which blocks (Smith-Stark 1978); Inuit (Bittner 1994) extraction of the ext and does nothing else (Otsuka 2006) – Elsewhere: the eec = one corner of a broader constraint • Resumption: Tongan (Otsuka 2006) which blocks extraction of many things: (Aldridge 2004) • Passive (+): Salishan (Davis et al. 1993); • The repair to the eec: even more variation. Nukuoro (Drummond 2021) 1.3 The Sources of EECs • One view: case-discrimination (Otsuka 2006; Deal 2017) (3) Syntactic Ergativity: INT Highest – Argument: the eec iff 9 overt case-marking (Dixon 1994) cp – Claim: the a’-extraction probe does not target eRg.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Exploration of the Pathways to Ergativity
    Alignment change in Chukotkan: Further exploration of the pathways to ergativity Jessica Kantarovich University of Chicago 1 Introduction The ways in which accusative case marking languages become ergative have been well- explored since Anderson's (1977) paper, which first proposed two possible pathways to erga- tive case (via passives and possessives). Numerous additional sources of ergative case have been identified across the world's languages. Coghill's (2016) book documents at least six potential pathways for an accusative to ergative alignment shift, and three that have been claimed to produce the reverse change. Coghill also notes numerous cases of cyclic align- ment change, where systems shift back and forth between ergative and accusative marking, demonstrating that alignment systems are not fixed and may be constantly evolving. Eastern Aramaic dialects evidence this kind of cyclic change (accusative to ergative to accusative); a similar process is underway in dialects of Inuktitut (Johns 2001). In contrast to the typical account of alignment change which focuses on reanalyzed con- structions, Whitman and Yanagida (2012) adopt an approach where changes from accusative to non-accusative systems (and vice-versa) are the result of changes in how case features are assigned and which part of the structure attracts the syntactic subject. This paper focuses on reanalysis as the mechanism of change and sets aside the question of how the change may been instantiated in speakers' grammars synchronically.1 The role of language contact in alignment change has also been examined, with a number of proposed shifts being attributed to various degrees of contact-based influence. Mithun (2008: 331-332) claims that contact contributed to the spread of split-S alignment in indige- nous North American languages.
    [Show full text]