Phum-Baitang-Spa-Temple-Menu-2019.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mai Tho Truyen
C n o n p P G o ử n N m C n M ọ uyền --- o0o --- Nguồn www.chuaxaloi.vn Chuyển sang ebook 18-08-2016 Người thực hiện : Nguyễn Ngọc Thảo - [email protected] Tuyết Nhung - [email protected] Dũng Trần - [email protected] Nam Thiên - [email protected] Link Audio Tại Website http://www.phapthihoi.org Mục Lục LỜI NÓI ẦU PHẬ GI O Ử ÔNG NAM CHƢƠNG I - SỰ MỞ RỘNG CỦA PHẬT GIÁO CHƢƠNG II - NGHI VẤN VỀ SUVARNABHUMI LỊCH Ử PHẬ GI O MIẾN IỆN LỜI NÓI ĐẦU THỜI KỲ THỨ NHẤT THỜI KỲ THỨ HAI KẾT LUẬN LỊCH Ử PHẬ GI O NAM DƢƠNG LỜI NÓI ĐẦU CHƢƠNG I - PHẬT GIÁO Ở NAM DƢƠNG TỪ ĐẦU TỚI THẾ KỶ THỨ VIII TÂY LỊCH CHƢƠNG II - PHẬT GIÁO Ở NAM DƢƠNG, TỪ THẾ KỶ THỨ IX TỚI NGÀY NAY CHƢƠNG III - NGHỆ THUẬT VÀ VĂN CHƢƠNG PHẬT GIÁO NAM DƢƠNG KẾT LUẬN LỊCH SỬ PHẬ GI O CAM BỐ CHƢƠNG I - MỘT ÍT TÀI LIỆU LỊCH SỬ CHƢƠNG II - THỜI KỲ DU NHẬP HAY THỜI KỲ FOU-NAN CHƢƠNG III - THỜI KỲ TCHEN LA (CHƠN LẠP) (Thế kỷ VI-IX) LỊCH Ử PHẬ GI O AI LAO CHƢƠNG I - QUỐC GIA VÀ DÂN TỘC LÀO CHƢƠNG II - PHẬT GIÁO DU NHẬP CHƢƠNG III - ẢNH HƢỞNG PHẬT GIÁO TRONG ĐỜI SỐNG DÂN TỘC LÀO, HIỆN TÌNH PHẬT GIÁO LỊCH Ử PHẬ GI O H I LAN CHƢƠNG I - MỘT ÍT LỊCH SỬ CHƢƠNG II - DU NHẬP VÀ CÁC THỜI KỲ TIẾN BỘ CHƢƠNG III - TÌNH HÌNH PHẬT GIÁO HIỆN NAY LỊCH Ử PHẬ GI O CHIÊM THÀNH CHƢƠNG I - MỘT ÍT LỊCH SỬ CHƢƠNG II - VĂN HÓA VÀ TÔN GIÁO LỊCH Ử PHẬ GI O ÍCH LAN CHƢƠNG I - MỘT ÍT LỊCH SỬ CHƢƠNG II - PHẬT GIÁO DU NHẬP TÍCH LAN CHƢƠNG III - PHẬT GIÁO TÍCH LAN TỪ 200 TỚI 20 TRƢỚC CN CHƢƠNG IV - TỪ ĐẦU TÂY LỊCH CHO ĐẾN HIỆN NAY ---o0o--- CH NH RÍ MAI HỌ RUYỀN (1905-1973) ---o0o--- LỜI NÓI ẦU Với mục đích kế thừa tôn chỉ học Phật và phổ biến giáo lý, tri thức đến mọi tầng lớp cư sĩ, Phật tử được hiểu đúng chánh pháp và hành trì lợi lạc. -
A New Date for the Phnom Da Images and Its Implications for Early Cambodia
A New Date for the Phnom Da Images and Its Implications for Early Cambodia NANCY H. DOWLING SCHOLARS FAMILIAR WITH SOUTHEAST ASIAN ART HISTORY are well aware of a confusing chronology for early Cambodian sculpture. One reason for this situa tion is obvious. For nearly fifty years, Cambodian art history has been wed to the work of George Coedes. Praised as the dean of Southeast Asian history, he was a member of an elite group of French scholars who worked in Cambodia for decades before World War II. In 1944, he wrote Histoire ancienne des hats hindouses d'Extreme-Orient, in which he established a chronological framework for early Southeast Asian history based on an interplay of Chinese texts and indigenous inscriptions. Most Southeast Asian historians readily admit that "his book remains the basic source for early South East Asian history, and while much recent re search, based upon new inscriptional evidence or re-readings, modifies some of Coedes' specific conclusions, the structure remains his" (Brown 1996: 3). Such a singular dependency on Coedes had a stifling effect on Cambodian art history. When Jean Boisselier, carrying on the work of Philippe Stern and Gilberte de Coral-Remusat, made a comprehensive attempt to set in order Cambodian sculpture, the French art historian fitted the works of art into Coedes' ready made chronology. Unfortunately, this all happened as if it were preferable to adjust Cambodian sculpture to a preconceived notion of history rather than ques tioning the model. In this way, some basic mistakes have been made, and these seriously affect the chronology and interpretation of early Cambodian sculpture. -
Appendix Appendix
APPENDIX APPENDIX DYNASTIC LISTS, WITH GOVERNORS AND GOVERNORS-GENERAL Burma and Arakan: A. Rulers of Pagan before 1044 B. The Pagan dynasty, 1044-1287 C. Myinsaing and Pinya, 1298-1364 D. Sagaing, 1315-64 E. Ava, 1364-1555 F. The Toungoo dynasty, 1486-1752 G. The Alaungpaya or Konbaung dynasty, 1752- 1885 H. Mon rulers of Hanthawaddy (Pegu) I. Arakan Cambodia: A. Funan B. Chenla C. The Angkor monarchy D. The post-Angkor period Champa: A. Linyi B. Champa Indonesia and Malaya: A. Java, Pre-Muslim period B. Java, Muslim period C. Malacca D. Acheh (Achin) E. Governors-General of the Netherlands East Indies Tai Dynasties: A. Sukhot'ai B. Ayut'ia C. Bangkok D. Muong Swa E. Lang Chang F. Vien Chang (Vientiane) G. Luang Prabang 954 APPENDIX 955 Vietnam: A. The Hong-Bang, 2879-258 B.c. B. The Thuc, 257-208 B.C. C. The Trieu, 207-I I I B.C. D. The Earlier Li, A.D. 544-602 E. The Ngo, 939-54 F. The Dinh, 968-79 G. The Earlier Le, 980-I009 H. The Later Li, I009-I225 I. The Tran, 1225-I400 J. The Ho, I400-I407 K. The restored Tran, I407-I8 L. The Later Le, I4I8-I8o4 M. The Mac, I527-I677 N. The Trinh, I539-I787 0. The Tay-Son, I778-I8o2 P. The Nguyen Q. Governors and governors-general of French Indo China APPENDIX DYNASTIC LISTS BURMA AND ARAKAN A. RULERS OF PAGAN BEFORE IOH (According to the Burmese chronicles) dat~ of accusion 1. Pyusawti 167 2. Timinyi, son of I 242 3· Yimminpaik, son of 2 299 4· Paikthili, son of 3 . -
A History of Cambodia Free Download
A HISTORY OF CAMBODIA FREE DOWNLOAD David P. Chandler | 384 pages | 02 Aug 2007 | The Perseus Books Group | 9780813343631 | English | Boulder, CO, United States A History of Cambodia (Third Edition) Simultaneous attacks around the perimeter of Phnom Penh pinned down Republican forces, while other CPK units overran fire bases controlling the vital lower Mekong resupply route. Early Funan was composed of loose communities, each with its own ruler, linked by a common culture and a shared economy of rice farming people in the hinterland and traders in the coastal towns, who were economically interdependent, A History of Cambodia surplus rice production found its way to the ports. Recording of the Royal Chronology discontinues with King Jayavarman IX Parameshwara or Jayavarma-Paramesvara — there exists not a single contemporary record of even a king's name for over years. Discount Codes. Retrieved 29 June Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. During his nearly forty years in power he becomes the A History of Cambodia prolific monument A History of Cambodia, who establishes the city of Angkor Thom with its central temple the Bayon. Neher Book Category Asia portal. Nov 25, Sarah rated it really liked it. Archived from the original PDF on 14 July From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Books by David P. International Journal of Historical Archaeology. My solution was to skim for time periods where I was most curious and to sort through for activities in specific parts of the country. The last Sanskrit inscription is datedand records the succession of Indrajayavarman by Jayavarman IX Parameshwara — His book on "A history of Cambodia" provides a comprehensive and insightful analysis and narratives on Cambodian history from the pre and post Angkor period until modern Cambodia. -
Phaät Giaùo Vieät Nam Do Thöôïng Toïa Toá Lieân (Mieàn Baéc) Laõnh Ñaïo
CHAÙNH TRÍ MAI THOÏ TRUYEÀN 1 PHAÄT GIAÙO SÖÛ ÑOÂNG NAM AÙ 2 PHAÄT GIAÙO SÖÛ ÑOÂNG NAM AÙ CHAÙNH TRÍ MAI THOÏ TRUYEÀN 3 CHAÙNH TRÍ MAI THOÏ TRUYEÀN PHAÄT GIAÙO SÖÛ ÑOÂNG NAM AÙ Chaùnh Trí toaøn taäp 4 PHAÄT GIAÙO SÖÛ ÑOÂNG NAM AÙ Ban bieân taäp: Ban Phaät hoïc Xaù Lôïi – TK. Thích Ñoàng Boån – Cö só Toáng Hoà Caàm – Cö só Laâm Hoaøng Loäc – Cö só Traàn Ñöùc Haï – Cö só Traàn Phi Huøng – Cö só Toâ Vaên Thieän – Cö só Chính Trung CHAÙNH TRÍ MAI THOÏ TRUYEÀN 5 CHAÙNH TRÍ MAI THOÏ TRUYEÀN (1905-1973) 6 PHAÄT GIAÙO SÖÛ ÑOÂNG NAM AÙ CHAÙNH TRÍ MAI THOÏ TRUYEÀN 7 LÔØI NOÙI ÑAÀU Vôùi muïc ñích keá thöøa toân chæ hoïc Phaät vaø phoå bieán giaùo lyù, tri thöùc ñeán moïi taàng lôùp cö só, Phaät töû ñöôïc hieåu ñuùng chaùnh phaùp vaø haønh trì lôïi laïc. Treân tinh thaàn ñoù, Ban Phaät Hoïc Xaù Lôïi coá gaéng söu taäp caùc taùc phaåm cuûa Cö só Chaùnh trí Mai Thoï Truyeàn ñaõ bieân soaïn, dòch thuaät ñaêng taûi treân taïp chí Töø Quang. Chuùng toâi taäp hoïp laïi, hieäu chænh thaønh boä saùch Chaùnh Trí Toaøn taäp, trong ñoù coù taùc phaåm Phaät Giaùo Söû Ñoâng Nam AÙ naøy. Cö só Chaùnh trí Mai Thoï Truyeàn laø moät nhaø nghieân cöùu Phaät hoïc uyeân baùc, saùng laäp vaø laø Hoäi tröôûng Hoäi Phaät hoïc Nam Vieät, chuû bieân taïp chí Töø Quang, vôùi tieâu chí phoå bieán Phaät phaùp caên baûn. Caùc coâng trình nghieân cöùu, dòch thuaät vaø chuù giaûi cuûa oâng, ñeàu thaät söï laø nhöõng taùc phaåm Phaät hoïc saâu saéc, thieát thöïc vaø höõu ích khoâng chæ cho caùc nhaø nghieân cöùu maø cho caû caùc cö só, phaät töû, nhöõng ngöôøi muoán tìm hieåu vaø haønh trì chaùnh phaùp cuûa ñöùc Phaät. -
Cambogia=Cambodia=Campucea= Kampuchea=Cambodge=Khmer
CAMBOGIA CAMBOGIA=CAMBODIA=CAMPUCEA= KAMPUCHEA=CAMBODGE=KHMER Roat Kampuchea Regno di Cambogia Phnum Penh=Phnom Penh 400.000 ab. Kmq. 181.035 (178.035)(181.000)(181.040) Compreso Kmq. 3.000 di acque interne Dispute con Tailandia per: - Territorio di Preah Vihear (occupato Cambogia) - Poi Pet Area (occupato Tailandia) - Buri=Prachin Buri Area (occupato Tailandia). Dispute con Vietnam per: - Cocincina Occidentale e altri territori (occupati Vietnam) - alcune isole (occupate Vietnam): - Dak Jerman=Dak Duyt - Dak Dang=Dak Huyt - La Drang Area - Baie=Koh Ta Kiev Island - Milieu=Koh Thmey Island - Eau=Koh Sep Island - Pic=Koh Tonsay Island - Northern Pirates=Koh Po Island Rivendica parte delle Scarborough Shoals (insieme a Cina, Taivan, Vietnam, Corea, Malaisia, Nuova Zelanda). Dispute con Tailandia per acque territoriali. Dispute con Vietnam per acque territoriali. Movimento indipendentista Hmon Chao Fa. Movimento indipendentista Khmer Krom. Ab. 7.650.000---11.700.000 Cambogiani=Cmeri=Khmer (90%) - Cmeri Candali=Khmer Kandal=Cmeri Centrali=Central Khmers (indigeni) - Cmeri Cromi=Khmer Krom (cmeri insediati nella Cambogia SE e nel Vietnam Meridionale) - Cmeri Surini=Khmer Surin (cmeri insediati nella Cambogia NO e nelle province tailandesi di Surin, Buriram, Sisaket - Cmeri Loeu=Cmeri Leu=Khmer Loeu (termine ombrello per designare tutte le tribù collinari della Cambogia)(ca. 100.000 in tutto): - Parlanti il Mon-Cmero=Mon-Khmer (94%) - Cacioco=Kachok - Crungo=Krung - Cui=Kuy - Fnongo=Phnong - Tampuano=Tampuan (nella provincia di Ratanakiri NE) -
Kambujadesa Which Forms the Subject-Matter of This Course of Lectures
PREFACE In July 1942 I was invited by the university of Madras to deliver a course of lectures under the Sir William Meyer (Endowment) Lectureship, 1942-43. These lectures are published here in the form in which I delivered them, early in March 1943, with the addition of the footnotes and a list of Inscriptions, on which the study of the subject is primarily based. The scope and object of these lectures have been sufficiently indicated at the beginning of Lecture I, and I shall consider my labours amply rewarded if they serve to awaken an interest in, and promote the study of a highly important but little-known subject. The series of works on ancient Indian colonisation in the Far East which I planned nearly twenty years ago have not yet been completed. Three volumes dealing with Champa (Annam) and Suvarniadvipa (Malayasia) are out, the and remaining two volumes dealing with Kambuja (Cambodia) , Burma and Siam still await publication. These two volumes will deal more comprehensively with the subject covered by these lectures. In view of the present situation in the country, it is diffi- cult to say when, if ever, those two volumes will see the light of the day. Till then, the present work may be regarded as completing the series of my studies on the history of ancient Indian colonies in the Far East. As inscriptions have been frequently referred to in the course of these lectures, I have added at the end a list of old Kambuja inscriptions, arranged chronologically as far as possible. The serial number is quoted in the text against each inscription to enable the reader to find out the necessary details by a reference to the list. -
A Short History of Cambodia.Pdf
Short History of Cambodia 10/3/06 1:57 PM Page i CAMBODIAA SHORT HISTORY OF Short History of Cambodia 10/3/06 1:57 PM Page ii Short History of Asia Series Other books in the series Short History of Bali, Robert Pringle Short History of China and Southeast Asia, Martin Stuart-Fox Short History of Indonesia, Colin Brown Short History of Japan, Curtis Andressen Short History of Laos, Grant Evans Short History of Malaysia, Virginia Matheson Hooker Series Editor Milton Osborne has had an association with the Asian region for over 40 years as an academic, public servant and independent writer. He is the author of many books on Asian topics, including Southeast Asia: An introductory history, first published in 1979 and now in its ninth edition, and The Mekong: Turbulent past, uncertain future, published in 2000. Short History of Cambodia 10/3/06 1:57 PM Page iii A SHORT HISTORY OF CAMBODIA FROM EMPIRE TO SURVIVAL By John Tully Short History of Cambodia 10/3/06 1:57 PM Page iv First published in 2005 by Allen & Unwin Copyright © John Tully 2005 Maps by Ian Faulkner All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. The Australian Copyright Act 1968 (the Act) allows a maximum of one chapter or 10 per cent of this book, whichever is the greater, to be photocopied by any educational institution for its educational purposes provided that the educational institution (or body that administers it) has given a remuneration notice to Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) under the Act. -
Funan Reviewed : Deconstructing the Ancients In: Bulletin De L'ecole Française D'extrême-Orient
Michael Vickery Funan Reviewed : Deconstructing the Ancients In: Bulletin de l'Ecole française d'Extrême-Orient. Tome 90-91, 2003. pp. 101-143. Citer ce document / Cite this document : Vickery Michael. Funan Reviewed : Deconstructing the Ancients. In: Bulletin de l'Ecole française d'Extrême-Orient. Tome 90-91, 2003. pp. 101-143. doi : 10.3406/befeo.2003.3609 http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/befeo_0336-1519_2003_num_90_1_3609 Abstract Michael Vickery Funan Reviewed: Deconstructing the Ancients The review and deconstruction in this article concern the story of Funan composed by an earlier generation of western scholars which permeates all historical syntheses of Cambodia to date. It is not a critique of the Chinese sources, which constitute nearly the entire corpus of written evidence for Funan, nor of Pelliot's translations of those sources, for the author is not a Sinologist. Among the author's concerns are (1) a strict distinction between historic evidence and prehistoric folktales, resulting in a denial that any 'Kaundinya' ever came to Funan from India, (2) misconstrual of Funanese royal succession patterns, which suggest matrilineal uncle-to-nephew succession, seen more clearly in later periods in Cambodia, (3) evidence that Funan's ethno-linguistic situation was Khmer, against the recent growing consensus that it was Austronesian, (4) denial of the validity of Cœdès's identification of a name transmitted by the Chinese with the locally recorded ' Vyādhapura' and its location at Ba Phnom. The conclusions about Funan's location and its capital are that the old idea of original Funan as comprising southern Cambodia and some adjoining part of southern Vietnam is still acceptable, but that the location, or locations at different times, of its 'capital(s)' are uncertain and will be decided by archaeology, with the strongest candidate at present Angkor Borei, and the weakest Ba Phnom. -
Introduction
CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE DATE PERIOD MAJOR RULERS SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS 1900 Protectorate Norodom 1863 Treaty with French Ang Duong Phnom Penh the capital; Vietnamese control of Cambodia 1 1800 Vietnamese annex Delta 1700 Udong the capital 1600 Post-Classic Chai Chettha II Fall of Lovek to the Thai I N T R O D U C T I O N Ang Chan I 1500 1400 Court moves to Quatre Bras region Had the ancient Greeks and Romans known of Angkor, they surely would End of Khmer Empire; Thai invasions have counted that great city as the eighth wonder of the world. When the 1300 Jayavarman VIII Anti-Buddhist iconoclasm French naturalist and explorer Henri Mouhot – to whom was given the honour of first bringing its ruins to the general attention of Europe – entered 1200 Jayavarman VII Angkor Thom; apogee of Khmer Empire Tribhuvanadityavarman Angkor in 1860, he questioned the local people about its origin. Among Suryavarman II Cham invasion of Angkor 1100 Angkor Wat the explanations that they gave him was the suggestion that it might have Classic Udayadityavarman II Phimai been ‘the work of the giants’, leading Mouhot to exclaim: Suryavarman I Baphuon 1000 Rajendravarman II Banteay Srei The work of giants! The expression would be very just, if used 900 Jayavarman IV Yashodharapura the capital; Bakheng figuratively, in speaking of these prodigious works, of which no Hariharalaya the capital Indravarman I Founding of the Khmer Empire one who has not seen them can form any adequate idea; and in the 800 Jayavarman II construction of which patience, strength, and genius appear to have Jayadevi done their utmost in order to leave to future generations proofs of 700 Jayavarman I their power and civilization.1 Bhavavarman II 600 Chitrasena, Almost every early explorer (and virtually every other subsequent visitor) Bhavavarman I Ishanapura (Sambor Prei Kuk) Early Rudravarman has been wonder-struck by the beauty and multiplicity of the sculptures that 500 Kingdoms can be seen everywhere – on lintels and on walls, and free-standing before and within temples. -
As in Heaven, So on Earth: the Politics of Viṣṇu, Śiva and Harihara Images in Preangkorian Khmer Civilisation
21 Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 34 (1), pp 21-39 February 2003. Printed in the United Kingdom. © 2003 The National University of Singapore As in Heaven, So on Earth: The Politics of Vieou, Siva and Harihara Images in Preangkorian Khmer Civilisation Paul A. Lavy Analysis of the earliest sculpture and epigraphy of Southeast Asia reveals contrasting geographic patterns regarding the worship of Hindu deities. During the seventh century, efforts to consolidate political authority by Khmer rulers led to the deployment of Harihara, a god that embodied multiple conceptions ofpower and could serve as a ready statement ofpolitical and religious unification. The mitred four-armed Vi~l)u images of early Southeast Asia have been the focus of a number of scholarly studies. 1 Most of these have dealt primarily with chronology and stylistic and iconographic relationships with Indian art rather than the cultural context of the images themselves. In a recent article that attempts to address all of these issues, Nadine Dalsheimer and Pierre-Yves Manguin argue that the popularity of Vi~l)U in ancient Southeast Asia - and particularly in Preangkorian Khmer civilisation (generally defined as pre-ninth-century CE) - was due to the role played by Vai~l)avism in Southeast Asian trading networks. 2 Their emphasis on trade as an explanation for the diffusion oflndian religions and art into Southeast Asia is a restatement oflong-asserted arguments that are open to considerable doubt. While trade may partially account for the distribution of the mitred Vi~l)u images in the coastal areas of Southeast Asia, it does not adequately explain the popularity of these images, the significance ofVi~l)u in Southeast Paul Lavy is a Ph. -
The Very First References to Panpan, As We Said in the Preceding Chapter
CHAPTER FIVE PANPAN FROM THE 5m TO THE gm CENTURY: HISTORY AND BRAHMANICAL RELIGIOUS REMAINS A. HISTORIC REFERENCES TO PANPAN IN THE ASIAN CONTEXT The very first references to Panpan, as we said in the preceding chapter, are contained in that part of the Liangshu that is devoted to Funan, and follow the sections taken from the account of Kang Tai and Zhu Ying describing Fanshiman's conquests in the Malay Peninsula; it is in connection with these that G. H. Luce speculated that this period might have been the time of the foundation of the city-state itself. If this were the case, it would mean that Funan was named after its reigning sovereign at this moment in the beginning of the third century. Such a connection would at least have the merit of giving to the region a certain historic veneer, something that is in general sorely lacking for the political entities of the Malay Peninsula. Beyond the account in Chapter Four of the arrival of the Brahman Kaui:icjinya in the Peninsula, which, as it happens, is very uncertainly dated (to the end of the fourth century or the beginning of the fifth), we possess very little precise information about Panpan. It is questionable whether Panpan could have been a vassal state of Funan, other than nominally, perhaps. New assessments of the geopolitical reality of this entity and of its successor, Zhenla (see above, Chapter Four), now make it clear that throughout its history except at rare moments like the period of Fanshiman's conquests-it was an aggregate of rival kingdoms and principalities which occa sional rare sovereigns succeeded in bringing together under their authority for the duration of one reign, rather than the centralized kingdom many were pleased to invent on the model of the Chinese account, but which never existed.