DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase 1 Completereport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phase 1 Completereport PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE GOVERNOR'S LAND AT TWO RIVERS JAMES CITY COUNTY, VIRGINIA Submitted to: Governor's Land Associates, Inc. Post Office Box EJ KilYiamsburg, Virginia 23187 May lYYl James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. 77ze Yeardley House Jarnestown, Virginia 23081 (804) 229-9485 PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF TIIE GOVERNOR'S LAND AT TWO RLVERS JAMES CITY COUN'IY, VIRGINIA JAMES RIVER INSTITUTE for ARCHAEOLOGY, INC. 2080 Jarnestown Road Williamsburg, Virginia 231 85 (804) 229-9485 ABSTRACT Beginning in 1988, the James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. (JRIA) conducted a Phase 1 archaeological survey on a 1,440 acre tract of privately-held land called the Governor's Land at Two Rivers, planned for residential and recreational development by Governor's Land Associates, Inc. The project area is located in James City County, Virginia, adjacent to the confluence of the James and Chickahominy rivers. The objective of the Phase I survey was the identification of all archaeological sites in the project area. Research supporting the project was multi-disciplinary and consisted of a review of archaeological site forms and reports for the study area on file at the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR); archival research including a land title search and review of other sources of pertinent historical documents and maps; and a comprehensive archaeological survey of the entire property. In general, the results of the survey indicate that site locations are closely associated with water resources, relatively arable and moderately well-drained soils, and roadways. Few indications of prehistoric and historic occupation were observed within large tracts of poorly drained land within the interior north-central portions of the property. This evidence corresponds with the current understanding of settlement patterns in the region. A total of 94 sites were investigated during the survey. Of these, 49 have been recommended for Phase I1 significance evaluation (see Tables I and 11). TABLE OF COATTENTS Page Abstract ................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................ iv List of Tables ............................................. v Introduction ............................................... 1 Environmental Setting ...................................... 7 Prehistoric overview ....................................... 28 Historic Overview .......................................... 39 Previous Research .......................................... 90 Prehistory ............................................ 92 Historical ........................................... 101 Research Design ............................................ 104 Survey Methods ............................................. 115 Survey Conditions ..................................... 127 Survey Results ............................................. 128 West Tract ........................................... 128 East Tract ........................................... 185 Summary .................................................... 215 Proposed Paspahegh District Nomination ..................... 235 Bibliography ........................................ 253 Appendix A .Finds Lists ................................... 264 West Tract ........................................... 264 East Tract ........................................... 325 Appendix B .Site Forms .................................... 354 West Tract ........................................... 354 East Tract ........................................... 431 iii LIST OF FIGURES Page 1 . Location of Governor's Land at Two Rivers ............. 2 2 . ~oundariesof the Survey Area ......................... 5 3 . Soil Characteristics of the Survey Area ............... 26 4 . Virginia Discovered and Discribed. 1610 ............... 44 5 . Chart of Virginia. 1608 ................................ 45 6 . Virginia and Maryland. 1670 ........................... 66 7 . [Untitled Map of Virginia]. 1681 ....................... 67 8 . Virginia and Maryland. 1690 ............................ 68 9 . Survey for Thomas Lord Culpeper. 1683 .................. 70 10 . A Map of the Most Inhabited Part of Virginia. 1755 ..... 72 11 . Plan du terein a la Rive Gauche de la Riviere de James. 1781 ......................................... 77 12 . Hare's Map of the Vicinity of Richmond and the Peninsula Campaign. 1862 ............................... 82 13 . Map of New Kent. Charles City and James City Counties. 1863 ........................................ 83 14 . James)River. Virginia. from College Creek to Chickahominy River. 1873-1874 ......................... 85 15 . Chickahominy River. 1873-1874 ......................... 86 16 . Plat of the Pine Dell Land Company's Land. 1940 ........ 89 17 . Location of survey zones .west tract ................... 119 18 . Location of survey zones .east tract .................. 120 19 . Location of archaeological sites .west tract .......... 129 20 . Location of archaeological sites .east tract .......... 130 21 . Proposed Paspahegh Archaeological District ............. 237 LIST OF TABLES Table I . West Tract Site Recommendations ....................230 Table I1 . East Tract Site Recommendations ...................233 Table I11 . Sites Containing Native American Components Within Proposed Paspahegh Archaeological District ...... 239 Table IV . Sites Containing Historic Colonial or Later Components Within Proposed Paspehegh Archaeological District .......................... 241 INTRODUCTION Governor's Land Associates, Inc. contracted the James ~iver Institute For Archaeology, Inc. (JRIA) to conduct a Phase I archaeological survey of approximately 1,440 acres that will be impacted by a planned residential and recreational community called the Governor's Land at Two Rivers, located in James City County, Virginia (Figure 1). The Phase I survey was originally undertaken as a proffer to James City County by Governor's Land Associates, and represented the county's first large-scale archaeological proffer . The survey was initiated by the property owners in anticipation of the presence of important archaeological remains within the property which would require identification for management purposes. At the time of the survey, there were no federal permits or jurisdiction on the property. Since December, 1990, no archaeological work has been conducted on the property. The survey area is a contiguous tract of land, roughly rectangular in shape, extending north from the shores of the James River and west from Shellbank Creek to the confluence of the Chickahominy ~ivernear Barrets Point. The average north-south width of the project area is one mile, and its length is approximately 3.5 miles. The northern boundary of the survey area corresponds approximately with State Route 5. This property is known as the "Governor's Land" because of its proximity to the 3,000 acre 17th-century tract associated with the governor of 3 Virginia from 1618 to 1699. Yet, the property has a complicated history which does not clearly define it as part of the historic Governor's Land estate, although at times tenants and occupants appear to have moved freely between the neighboring settlements. The Governor's Land at Two Rivers property consists of a diverse series of broad and dissected terraces of coastal lowlands and interior uplands adjacent to the confluence of the James and Chickahominy rivers. The property contains discrete areas of prime farmland and large tracts of poorly drained soils within the predominately forested tract. The results of the recent JRIA survey, combined with the results of previous studies by the College of William and Mary, have produced an important body of archaeological and historical information for one of the last large undeveloped tracts of riverine land in James City County. Decades of previous interdisciplinary research in the middle section of the James-York Peninsula (Colonial Williamsburg Foundation 1986) have produced a body of comparable data through which the Governor's land at T'wo Rivers tract can be understood within local, regional, and national contexts. In order to meet the planning needs of the property owners, JRIA identified all archaeological resources on the property, and prioritized the most important of these for avoidance or redesign 4 of construction plans, if practical, in place of data recovery. The present report includes revisions as suggested by the State Historic Preservation Office in Virginia required to bring the project in to compliance with federal preservation legislation, regulations, and guidelines concerning the affect on cultural resources of activities conducted under federal permit. The original field survey was conducted by the staff of JRIA, under the field supervision of William Leigh 111 and the direction of Senior Archaeologist Nicholas Luccketti. The field survey was conducted from July 13 to November 4, 1988; during July 1989; and from March 14 to April 21, 1990. The entire 1,440 acre tract was examined in an attempt to identify and inventory all cultural remains on the property (Figure 2). The property was surveyed using practical and comprehensive sampling techniques designed to accommodate the varying conditions of surface exposure in the area. The principal authors of the archaeological sections of the report are Nicholas Luccketti and Charles Hodges. The original survey data were compiled by Luccketti and William Leigh. Beverly Straube and Todd Behrens cataloged the historic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • James River Geography
    James River Geography Welcome to NOAA's James River Interpretive Buoy, located at latitude 37 degrees 12.25 minutes North, longitude 76 degrees 46.65 minutes West. It lies off Jamestown Island about a quarter-mile south of Captain John Smith's statue, where he can see it well as he looks out over the river. This buoy is anchored in 43 feet of water at the edge of the narrow shoal that runs along the island. The river's channel is deep here, as the James narrows down between Swanns Point on the south and Jamestown on the north, but it quickly shoals as it sweeps through the broad meander curve from Cobham Bay around Hog Island and down toward Burwell Bay. The buoy lies about thirty miles above the mouth of the James at Hampton Roads. Jamestown Island lies at a transition point on the James. Five miles upstream is the mouth of the Chickahominy River, which adds a strong current of fresh water to the heavy flow already coming out of the James watershed from deep in Virginia's uplands, the mountains at the eastern edge of the Alleghany Plateau. In wet years, the water here is nearly fresh. The mouth of the James, however, lies close to the Chesapeake's mouth, so salt water can also flow upriver with the tides. In John Smith's time here, the region suffered a multi-year drought, so the river and the colonists' drinking water was probably brackish, an irritating factor that may account for some of the bickering and poor health that plagued them.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamestown Long Range Interpretive Plan (LRIP)
    Jamestown Colonial National Historical Park Long Range Interpretive Plan Update July 2009 Prepared for the National Park Service by Ron Thomson, Compass Table of Contents Part 1: Foundation Introduction 4 Background 6 Park in 2009 12 Purpose & Significance 19 Interpretive Themes 22 Audiences 29 Audience Experiences 32 Issues & Initiatives 35 Part 2: Taking Action Introduction 38 Projects from 2000 Plan 38 Current Area of Focus 40 Enhance Existing Resources 40 Anniversaries/Events 43 Linking Research, Interpretation & Sales 44 Education Programs 45 Technology for Interpretation 46 Evaluation & Professional Standards 47 Staffing & Training 47 Library, Collection & Research Needs 48 Implementation Charts 52 Participants 59 Appendices 1. Other Planning Documents 60 2. Partner Mission Statements 64 3. Second Century Goals 66 4. Interpretation & Education Renaissance Action Plan 69 5. Children in Nature 71 2 Part 1 The Foundation 3 Introduction The Long Range Interpretive Plan A Long Range Interpretive Plan (LRIP) provides a 5+ year vision for a park’s interpretive program. A facilitator skilled in interpretive planning works with park staff, partners, and outside consultants to prepare a plan that is consistent with other current planning documents. Part 1 of the LRIP establishes criteria against which existing and proposed personal services and media can be measured. It identifies themes, audiences, audience experiences, and issues. Part 2 describes the mix of services and facilities that are necessary to achieve management goals and interpretive mission. It includes implementation charts that plot a course of action, assign responsibilities, and offer a schedule of activity. When appropriate, Appendices provide more detailed discussions of specific topics. The completed LRIP forms a critical part of the more inclusive Comprehensive Interpretive Plan (CIP).
    [Show full text]
  • The Lincoln- Mcclellan Relationship in Myth and Memory
    The Lincoln- McClellan Relationship in Myth and Memory MARK GRIMSLEY Like many Civil War historians, I have for many years accepted invita- tions to address the general public. I have nearly always tried to offer fresh perspectives, and these have generally been well received. But almost invariably the Q and A or personal exchanges reveal an affec- tion for familiar stories or questions. (Prominent among them is the query “What if Stonewall Jackson had been present at Gettysburg?”) For a long time I harbored a private condescension about this affec- tion, coupled with complete incuriosity about what its significance might be. But eventually I came to believe that I was missing some- thing important: that these familiar stories, endlessly retold in nearly the same ways, were expressions of a mythic view of the Civil War, what the amateur historian Otto Eisenschiml memorably labeled “the American Iliad.”1 For Eisenschiml “the American Iliad” was merely a clever title for a compendium of eyewitness accounts of the conflict, but I take the term seriously. In Homer’s Iliad the anger of Achilles, the perfidy of Agamemnon, the doomed gallantry of Hector—and the relationships between them—have enormous, uncontested, unchanging, and almost primal symbolic meaning. So too do certain figures in the American Iliad. Prominent among these are the butcher Grant, the Christ-like Lee, and the rage- filled Sherman. I believe that the traditional Civil War narrative functions as a national myth of central importance to our understanding of ourselves as Americans. And like the classic mythologies of old, it contains timeless wisdom about what it means to be a human being.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocahontas and Captain John Smith Revisited
    Pocahontas and Captain John Smith Revisited FREDERIC W. GLEACH Cornell University The story of Pocahontas and Captain John Smith is one that all school­ children in the United States seem to learn early on, and one that has served as the basis for plays, epic poems, and romance novels as well as historical studies. The lyrics of Peggy Lee's hit song Fever exemplify these popular treatments: Captain Smith and Pocahontas Had a very mad affair. When her daddy tried to kill him She said, 'Daddy, oh don't you dare — He gives me fever ... with his kisses, Fever when he holds me tight; Fever — I'm his Mrs. Daddy won't you treat him right.' (Lee et al 1958) The incident referred to here, Pocahontas's rescue of Smith from death at the orders of her father, the paramount chief Powhatan, was originally recorded by the only European present — Smith himself. While the factu- ality of Smith's account has been questioned since the mid-19th century, recent textual analysis by Lemay (1992) supports the more widely held opinion that it most likely occurred as Smith reported. Other recent studies have employed methods and models imported from literary criticism, gen­ erally to demonstrate the nature of English colonial and historical modes of apprehending otherness.1 While my work may be easily contrasted to these approaches, two re­ cent studies must be mentioned which have employed understandings and methods similar to my own. Kidwell (1992:99-101) used Pocahontas as an example in her discussion of "Indian Women as Cultural Mediators", 1ln addition to the comments of participants in the Algonquian Conference I have had the benefit of discussion with members of the Department of Anthropol­ ogy of Cornell University, where I presented some of these ideas in a departmental colloquium.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulated Changes in Salinity in the York and Chickahominy Rivers from Projected Sea-Level Rise in Chesapeake Bay
    Prepared in cooperation with the City of Newport News Simulated Changes in Salinity in the York and Chickahominy Rivers from Projected Sea-Level Rise in Chesapeake Bay Open-File Report 2011–1191 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photograph: St. Michaels Marina, Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. Simulated Changes in Salinity in the York and Chickahominy Rivers from Projected Sea-Level Rise in Chesapeake Bay By Karen C. Rice, Mark R. Bennett, and Jian Shen Prepared in cooperation with the City of Newport News Open-File Report 2011–1191 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Rice, K.C., Bennett, M.R., and Shen, Jian, 2011, Simulated changes in salinity in the York and Chickahominy Rivers from projected sea-level rise in Chesapeake Bay: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chickahominy Riverfront Park Raw Water Intake and Water Treatment Facility Public Information Meeting July 25, 2016 PERMITS THAT DETERMINE AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY
    Chickahominy Riverfront Park Raw Water Intake and Water Treatment Facility Public Information Meeting July 25, 2016 PERMITS THAT DETERMINE AVAILABLE WATER CAPACITY GROUNDWATER WATERWORKS OPERATION WITHDRAWAL PERMIT PERMIT ANNUAL AVG = 8.8 MGD MAX = 9.973 MGD MAX MONTH = 11.8 MGD 2 Why do we need a new water supply? Eastern Virginia GroundwaterEastern Virginia Groundwater Management AreaManagement Area • Declining groundwater levels • Advancing salt water intrusion • Land subsidence JCSA Permitted Groundwater Withdrawal Reduction (DEQ Proposal: 8.8 mgd reduced to 3.8-4.0 mgd) 3 JCSA Water Supply . Existing Supply DEQ VDH Capacity Production Facility Annual Withdrawal (mgd) (mgd) Five Forks WTP 5.9 5.000 7 Well Locations 2.9 4.973 • Owens-Illinois • Stonehouse • Ford’s Colony • Kristiansands • The Pottery • Canterbury Hills • Ewell Hall and Olde Towne Road TOTAL 8.8 9.973 . Potential Future Water Supply Newport News Waterworks (NNWW) Purchase Agreement = 2 mgd (drought condition)* *JCSA infrastructure improvements required for delivery. 4 Average water demand is projected to increase. 5 Future demand will exceed existing permitted capacity. Average Day Demand Maximum Day Demand 6 Reduction in DEQ permitted groundwater withdrawal to 4.0 mgd will result in immediate deficit. Current DEQ Groundwater Withdrawal Reduced DEQ Groundwater Withdrawal IMMEDIATE DEFICIT 7 Reduction in DEQ permitted groundwater withdrawal to 4.0 mgd impacts VDH permitted maximum capacity Current DEQ Groundwater Withdrawal Reduced DEQ Groundwater Withdrawal IMMEDIATE DEFICIT 8 Water Supply Alternatives No Action Water Conservation Only Alternative Water Supply with Water Conservation 9 Water Conservation Measures – Already in Effect . Water conservation and drought management program . Install low water use fixtures – Building Code .
    [Show full text]
  • RICHMOND Battlefields UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Stewart L
    RICHMOND Battlefields UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Stewart L. Udall, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director HISTORICAL HANDBOOK NUMBER THIRTY-THREE This publication is one of a series of handbooks describing the historical and archeological areas in the National Park System administered by the National Park Service of the United States Department of the Interior. It is printed by the Government Printing Office and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Washington 25, D.C. Price 25 cents. RICHMOND National Battlefield Park Virginia by Joseph P. Cullen NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORICAL HANDBOOK SERIES NO. 33 Washington, D.C., 1961 The National Park System, of which Richmond National Battlefield Park is a unit, is dedicated to conserving the scenic, scientific, and historic heritage of the United States for the benefit and inspiration of its people. Contents Page Richmond 1 The Army of the Potomac 2 PART ONE THE PENINSULA CAMPAIGN, SUMMER 1862 On to Richmond 3 Up the Peninsula 4 Drewry's Bluff 5 Seven Pines (Fair Oaks) 6 Lee Takes Command 9 The Seven Days Begins 12 Beaver Dam Creek (Ellerson's Mill) 13 Gaines' Mill 16 Savage Station 18 Glendale (Frayser's Farm) 21 Malvern Hill 22 End of Campaign 24 The Years Between 27 PART TWO THE FINAL STRUGGLE FOR RICHMOND, 1864-65 Lincoln's New Commander 28 Cold Harbor 29 Fort Harrison 37 Richmond Falls 40 The Park 46 Administration 46 Richmond, 1858. From a contemporary sketch. HE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR was unique in many respects. One Tof the great turning points in American history, it was a national tragedy op international significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Greater York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape
    Defining the Greater York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape Prepared by: Scott M. Strickland Julia A. King Martha McCartney with contributions from: The Pamunkey Indian Tribe The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe The Mattaponi Indian Tribe Prepared for: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay & Colonial National Historical Park The Chesapeake Conservancy Annapolis, Maryland The Pamunkey Indian Tribe Pamunkey Reservation, King William, Virginia The Upper Mattaponi Indian Tribe Adamstown, King William, Virginia The Mattaponi Indian Tribe Mattaponi Reservation, King William, Virginia St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland October 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of its management of the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, the National Park Service (NPS) commissioned this project in an effort to identify and represent the York River Indigenous Cultural Landscape. The work was undertaken by St. Mary’s College of Maryland in close coordination with NPS. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept represents “the context of the American Indian peoples in the Chesapeake Bay and their interaction with the landscape.” Identifying ICLs is important for raising public awareness about the many tribal communities that have lived in the Chesapeake Bay region for thousands of years and continue to live in their ancestral homeland. ICLs are important for land conservation, public access to, and preservation of the Chesapeake Bay. The three tribes, including the state- and Federally-recognized Pamunkey and Upper Mattaponi tribes and the state-recognized Mattaponi tribe, who are today centered in their ancestral homeland in the Pamunkey and Mattaponi river watersheds, were engaged as part of this project. The Pamunkey and Upper Mattaponi tribes participated in meetings and driving tours.
    [Show full text]
  • John Bankhead Magruder
    JOHN BANKHEAD MAGRUDER AND THE DEFENSE OF THE VIRGINIA PENINSULA 1861-1862 by Leonard W. Riedel, Jr. B.S. May 1975, Virginia Military Institute A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August, 1991 ADDroved bv: Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Copyright by Leonard W. Riedel, J r., 1991 All Rights Reserved ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT JOHN BANKHEAD MAGRUDER AND THE DEFENSE OF THE VIRGINIA PENINSULA 1861-1862 Leonard W. Riedel, Jr. Old Dominion University Director: Dr. Harold Wilson The v ia b ility of the Confederacy depended on its a b ility to organize a government and m ilitary defense force. Two early concerns were the operation of Gosport Naval Shipyard and protection of the Confederate capital at Richmond. Poised between them was Fortress Monroe. With undisputed Union mastery of the Chesapeake Bay, Fortress Monroe was a constant reminder of the tentative security of these critic a l points. The man chosen to protect the Peninsula was Virginian, John Bankhead Magruder. Less than one year later, his efforts were denigrated by Commanding General Joseph E. Johnston who wanted to pursue his own strategic plan. Under constant stress, Magruder performed with alacrity. Although the Peninsula was evacuated in May 1862, Magruder did an admirable job of defense. Magruder’s place in history has been discolored by perceived b attlefield failures at Savage’ s Station and Malvern H ill.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Women's Lives
    Documenting Women’s Lives A Users Guide to Manuscripts at the Virginia Historical Society A Acree, Sallie Ann, Scrapbook, 1868–1885. 1 volume. Mss5:7Ac764:1. Sallie Anne Acree (1837–1873) kept this scrapbook while living at Forest Home in Bedford County; it contains newspaper clippings on religion, female decorum, poetry, and a few Civil War stories. Adams Family Papers, 1672–1792. 222 items. Mss1Ad198a. Microfilm reel C321. This collection of consists primarily of correspondence, 1762–1788, of Thomas Adams (1730–1788), a merchant in Richmond, Va., and London, Eng., who served in the U.S. Continental Congress during the American Revolution and later settled in Augusta County. Letters chiefly concern politics and mercantile affairs, including one, 1788, from Martha Miller of Rockbridge County discussing horses and the payment Adams's debt to her (section 6). Additional information on the debt appears in a letter, 1787, from Miller to Adams (Mss2M6163a1). There is also an undated letter from the wife of Adams's brother, Elizabeth (Griffin) Adams (1736–1800) of Richmond, regarding Thomas Adams's marriage to the widow Elizabeth (Fauntleroy) Turner Cocke (1736–1792) of Bremo in Henrico County (section 6). Papers of Elizabeth Cocke Adams, include a letter, 1791, to her son, William Cocke (1758–1835), about finances; a personal account, 1789– 1790, with her husband's executor, Thomas Massie; and inventories, 1792, of her estate in Amherst and Cumberland counties (section 11). Other legal and economic papers that feature women appear scattered throughout the collection; they include the wills, 1743 and 1744, of Sarah (Adams) Atkinson of London (section 3) and Ann Adams of Westham, Eng.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with the Indians Introduction
    LIVING WITH THE INDIANS Introduction Archaeologists believe the American Indians were the first people to arrive in North America, perhaps having migrated from Asia more than 16,000 years ago. During this Paleo time period, these Indians rapidly spread throughout America and were the first people to live in Virginia. During the Woodland period, which began around 1200 B.C., Indian culture reached its high- est level of complexity. By the late 16th century, Indian people in Coastal Plain Virginia, united under the leadership of Wahunsonacock, had organized themselves into approximately 32 tribes. Wahunsonacock was the paramount or supreme chief, having held the title “Powhatan.” Not a personal name, the Powhatan title was used by English settlers to identify both the leader of the tribes and the people of the paramount chiefdom he ruled. Although the Powhatan people lived in separate towns and tribes, each led by its own chief, their language, social structure, religious beliefs and cultural traditions were shared. By the time the first English settlers set foot in “Tsena- commacah, or “densely inhabited land,” the Powhatan Indians had developed a complex culture with a centralized political system. Living With the Indians is a story of the Powhatan people who lived in early 17th-century Virginia— their social, political, economic structures and everyday life ways. It is the story of individuals, cultural interactions, events and consequences that frequently challenged the survival of the Pow- hatan people. It is the story of how a unique culture, through strong kinship networks and tradition, has endured and maintained tribal identities in Virginia right up to the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • James City County Historical
    new, substantial houses were built in the local area. local the in built were houses substantial new, runaway slaves, slaves, runaway Rebuilding” occurred throughout Virginia and some some and Virginia throughout occurred Rebuilding” wouldn’t return return wouldn’t new nation strengthened and took hold. A “Great “Great A hold. took and strengthened nation new announced that he he that announced After a period of stagnation, the economy of the the of economy the stagnation, of period a After F. Butler Butler F. General Benjamin Benjamin General some buildings. some Union Army Army Union at Jamestown, where they looted and damaged damaged and looted they where Jamestown, at Proclamation, Proclamation, landed on the Peninsula. They also came ashore ashore came also They Peninsula. the on landed Emancipation Emancipation Martha W. McCartney, Jody Puckett, and Dave Purschwitz. Purschwitz. Dave and Puckett, Jody McCartney, W. Martha influence. During the War of 1812, British invaders invaders British 1812, of War the During influence. Long before the the before Long David K. Hazzard, Adam Kinsman, Nan and Ralph Maxwell, Maxwell, Ralph and Nan Kinsman, Adam Hazzard, K. David resulted in the Tidewater region’s losing political political losing region’s Tidewater the in resulted Photo credits: Patricia Burnett, Colonial National Historical Park, Park, Historical National Colonial Burnett, Patricia credits: Photo Relocation of Virginia’s capital city to Richmond Richmond to city capital Virginia’s of Relocation warfare occurred. occurred. warfare for supplies they had furnished to the Allied Army. Army. Allied the to furnished had they supplies for elected to stay in the area.
    [Show full text]