A Bibliography of Northeast Historical Archaeology, 1987–2006 David R
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 35 Article 25 2006 A Bibliography of Northeast Historical Archaeology, 1987–2006 David R. Starbuck Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Starbuck, David R. (2006) "A Bibliography of Northeast Historical Archaeology, 1987–2006," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 35 35, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol35/iss1/25 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol35/iss1/25 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Northeast Historical Archaeology/Vol. 35, 2006 93 A Bibliography of Northeast Historical Archaeology, 1987– 2006 David R. Starbuck, Compiler Introduction many of whom are either retired or no longer with us. Now, of the older generation, only Twenty years have passed since the first Ivor Noël Hume continues to publish vast CNEHA bibliography (Starbuck 1986), which numbers of books and articles, seemingly inde- included nearly all historical archaeology liter- fatigable in his ability to inform and fascinate ature published within the area served by us. But 20 years ago, and continuing today, the CNEHA up through the fall of 1987. The orig- “baby boomers” and succeeding age sets have inal CNEHA bibliography consisted of 1,884 been prodigious in their publishing efforts. citations, reflecting at least 60 years of research The “faces,” the research topics, and even the in the 7 provinces, 13 states, and the District of institutions that conduct research continue to Columbia that are represented by CNEHA. In change, but some very good work has been the 1987 it may have appeared that traditional result. publishing would decline and be replaced by The contents and format of this “new” bib- the “gray literature” of cultural resource man- liography mirror the 1986 bibliography as agement, but that has not occurred. Today arti- closely as possible. Entries include published cles pertaining to historical archaeology in the articles, books, master’s theses and doctoral Northeast appear most frequently in the jour- dissertations, but they do not include book nals Northeast Historical Archaeology, Historical reviews, most newsletter items (although there Archaeology, IA, The Journal of the Society for are some exceptions), CRM reports, on-line Industrial Archeology, Archaeology of Eastern reports, or most of the other ephemera of our North America, North American Archaeologist field. (A notable exception is the “Telling Time” and Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, as posters prepared for CNEHA by George Miller well as in the magazines Archaeology, National and his colleagues at URS Corporation. These Geographic, Expedition, Smithsonian and have been included because it appears that American Archaeology. Also, the journals pub- these will be around in quantity for a long time lished by state and provincial archaeological to come!) It was also necessary to exclude societies now contain nearly as many articles some submissions because they did not pertain about historical archaeology as they do about to the region served by CNEHA, and others aspects of prehistory. At the same time, there because they are still “In Press,” and it was has been a veritable explosion of books on his- unclear as to when they would actually be torical archaeology topics, especially by such published. There is no duplication between the university presses as University Press of earlier bibliography and this one, but a small Florida, University Press of Virginia, number of pre-1986 entries that were missed in University of Tennessee Press, Cambridge the earlier bibliography have been included University Press, University Press of New here. England, and others. The result is that this new There are no doubt some omissions, incon- bibliography contains 2,087 citations per- sistencies and downright errors in this bibliog- taining to the Northeast. The current state of raphy, in spite of very good intentions. Many publications in our field appears very healthy individuals submitted copy for inclusion that indeed. contained contradictory or missing informa- It may be said that there has been a “gener- tion (such as volume and page numbers), there ational change” in who is doing the pub- was a certain “looseness” in indicating the cor- lishing. The earlier, 1986 bibliography was rect sequence of “senior” vs. “junior” authors, filled with entries by Ivor Noël Hume, James and it has not been possible in some cases to Deetz, John Cotter, Bert Salwen, Karlis locate and verify the accuracy of every citation. Karklins, Ed Lenik, Olive Jones and others, 94 Bibliography of Northeast Historical Archaeology/Starbuck And while we all depend on bibliographies as DC District of Columbia a guide to further research, it has been dis- tressing at times to find that a host of pub- Starbuck, David R., comp. lished citations (at the ends of articles and 1986 A Bibliography of Northeast Historical books) are loaded with errors. That, too, did Archaeology. Northeast Historical not make it easy to assemble this bibliography. Archaeology 15: 19–99. Some articles published in state and local jour- nals may also be missing, even though many Bibliography of these were carefully combed through. Abatelli, Carol What did make this task easier, though, 1991 Ethics of Reburial: Perspectives from was the assistance of dozens of CNEHA mem- Southern New England. Unpublished bers who sent in entries for inclusion. I have Master’s Thesis, Manhattenville College, tried to faithfully incorporate all of your State University of New York, Purchase. entries, except for the occasional book review, [CT] 1993 Ethics of Reburial: Two Case Studies from newsletter entry, or CRM report. Perhaps these Southern New England. Man in the Northeast will some day be included in bibliographies 45: 87–100. [CT] elsewhere. I would especially like to thank Ellen Blaubergs for submitting a great many Abbot, John, Graeme S. Mount, and Michael J. entries about archaeology in Ontario, David Mulloy Poirier who submitted many entries for 2000 The History of Fort St. Joseph. The Dundurn Connecticut, Paul Huey and Charles Fisher Group, Toronto, Ontario. [ON] who submitted many entries for New York Ackermann, Eric G. State, Monique Elie who provided many 1991 Economic Means Index: A Measure of Social entries for Quebec, and Mary Beaudry who Status in the Chesapeake, 1690–1815. provided entries for many of her students and Historical Archaeology 25(1): 26–36. [VA] colleagues. Mary and Ellen also spent a very substantial amount of time proofreading and Adams, Nick then adding to the nearly-completed bibliog- 1985 Excavations at the Frontenac Village Site, raphy. Kingston. Arch Notes 85(3): 11–16. Ontario As with the 1986 bibliography, at the end Archaeological Society, Toronto, Ontario. [ON] of many of the entries there is a letter abbrevia- 1986 Iroquois Settlement at Fort Frontenac in the tion in brackets to indicate the pertinent state Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Centuries. or province. The abbreviations are as follows: Ontario Archaeology 46: 5–20. [ON] NL Newfoundland and Labrador Affleck, Richard M. ON Ontario 2000 Nineteenth-Century North Country Farmers QC Quebec and the Expansion of the Capitalist Market. NB New Brunswick In Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-Century Domestic Site Archaeology in New York State, PEI Prince Edward Island ed. by John P. Hart and Charles L. Fisher, NS Nova Scotia 177–194. New York State Museum Bulletin ME Maine 495. University of the State of New York, NH New Hampshire New York State Education Department, VT Vermont Albany. [NY] MA Massachusetts CT Connecticut Agnew, Aileen Button RI Rhode Island 1988 Ceramics and the Sea Trade in Portsmouth, New Hampshire: 1765–1785. Northeast NY New York Historical Archaeology 17: 40–60. [NH] PA Pennsylvania 1995 The Historic Archeology of Deer Street, NJ New Jersey Portsmouth, New Hampshire: A Feature DEL Delaware Presentation. The New Hampshire Archeologist VA Virginia 35(1): 29–45. [NH] WV West Virginia 1995 Women and Property in Early 19th-Century MD Maryland Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Historical Northeast Historical Archaeology/Vol. 35, 2006 95 Archaeology 29(1): 62–74. [NH] recherches archéologiques du site de la place Jacques-Cartier (BjFj–44), 1996–1998. Albert, Patrick, André Bergeron et Bernard Vallée Collection Patrimoine archéologique de 2001 Le traitement d’une porte de cabine décou- Montréal, Ville de Montréal et ministère de o verte lors de la fouille du Lady Sherbrooke. la Culture et des Communications, n 1. Journal of the Canadian Association for [QC] Conservation (JCAC) 26: 8–14. [CAN] Armstrong, Douglas V. Allen, J.P., and Peter Pope 2003 Faces in the Basement. Dig 5(1): 16–18. [NY] 1990 A New Class of South-West English Pottery in North America. Post-Medieval Archaeology Armstrong, Douglas V., and Lou Ann Wurst 24: 51–60. [NL] 2003 Clay Faces in an Abolitionist Church: The Wesleyan Methodist Church in Syracuse, Allen, Richard S. New York. Historical Archaeology 37(2): 19–37. 1992 Connecticut Iron and Steel from Black Sea [NY] Sand. IA, The Journal of the Society for Industrial Archeology 18: 129–132. [CT] Arsenault, Daniel, Louis Gagnon, et Daniel Gendron 1998 Investigations archéologiques récentes au Allen, Ross F., James C. Dawson, Morris F. Glenn, sud de Kangirsujuaq et sur le site à pétro- Robert B. Gordon, David J. Killick, and glyphes de Qajartalik, détroit d’Hudson, Richard W. Ward Nunavik. Études Inuit Studies 22(2). [QC] 1990 An Archeological Survey of Bloomery Forges in the Adirondacks. IA, The Journal of the Arsenault, Sara Society for Industrial Archeology 16(1): 3–20. 2005 Les objets archéologiques au musée. [NY] Archéologiques (2005) 18: 35–50. [QC] Allison, Wes Arthurs, David 1999 “To Live and Labour for Another”: Exploring 1995 Late 19th Century Clay Pipes from Red Rock Slavery’s Earthen Legacy.