DOCSLIB.ORG

Masterplan Guidance, Queens Gardens, Hull

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Please ask for: Nikki Stocks Telephone: 01482 613421 Fax: 01482 613110 Email: [email protected] Text phone: 01482 300349 Date: Friday, 20 December 2013 Dear Councillor, Economy and Regeneration Overview and Scrutiny Commission The next meeting of the Economy and Regeneration Overview and Scrutiny Commission will be held at 14:00 on Thursday, 09 January 2014 in Room 82. The Agenda for the meeting is attached and reports are enclosed where relevant. Please Note: It is likely that the public, (including the Press) will be excluded from the meeting during discussions of exempt items since they involve the possible disclosure of exempt information as describe in Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972. Yours faithfully, Democratic Services Officer for the Chief Executive Page 1 of 76 Economy and Regeneration To: Membership: Councillors S Armstrong, S Chaytor, J Conner, J. Fareham, D Gemmell, E Mann, K E Mathieson, M H O’Mullane, L M Petrini, J Shipley and C Thomas Portfolio Holders: Councillor S Bayes, Portfolio Holder for Visitor Destination Councillor M Mancey, Portfolio Holder for Energy City Officers: Pauline Davis – Corporate Director Regeneration and Partnerships Mark Jones – Head of Economic Development and Regeneration (PA – My Broad) Malcolm Relph – City Economy Manager Fiona Harbord, Scrutiny Officer Nikki Stocks, Democratic Services Officer (x5) For Information: Councillor T McVie, Chair of Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee Members’ Information Office (Public Set) Reference Library (Public Set) Alerts: Brendan Arnold – Director of Resources Councillor Brady – Portfolio Holder for Partnerships Chief Executives Office, Kingston upon Hull City Council Trish Dalby, Corporate Director, City Services Councillor A Bell, Leader of the Opposition Sarah Laverack, Legal Services Andy Stankard, Principal Cabinet Support Officer Nathan Turner, Corporate Policy and Research Manager Councillor M Ross, Leader of the Opposition Jane Price, John Bracewell and Mark McEgan, Area Directors Guildhall Reception Press Office Group Secretariats Viking Radio – [email protected] Yorkshire Post – [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] Radio Humberside – [email protected] Hull Daily Mail – [email protected] & [email protected] KCFM Radio – [email protected] All Other Elected Members Page 2 of 76 Economy and Regeneration Overview and Scrutiny Commission 14:00 on Thursday, 09 January 2014 Room 82 A G E N D A PROCEDURAL ITEMS 1 Apologies To record the names of any Members sending apologies to this meeting. 2 Declarations of Interest To remind Members of the need to record the existence and nature of any Personal and Discolseable Pecuniary interest in items on the agenda, in accordance with the Member Code of Conduct. Members Code of Conduct - Part D1 of the Constitution) 3 Minutes of the meeting held on 5th December 2013 5 - 14 To agree the minutes as a true and corrent record. NON-EXEMPT ITEMS 4 Outstanding Action List 2013-14 15 - 20 To confirm that the Commission's actions have been implemented and monitor the response. 5 City Plan Progress - Verbal Update To update the Commission on the progress of the City Plan and the projects within it. 6 Hull City of Culture 2017 (December 2013- March 2014) 21 - 26 To provide Members with an overview of how Hull's successful bid to become UK City of Culture in 2017 will be developed in the period December 2013 to March 2014. Page 3 of 76 7 Analysis of Footfall Figures in Whitefriargate and the Old Town 27 - 32 To provide Members with information to enable them to consider further analysis of footfall figures in the City Centre. 8 City Centre Development Briefs for Kingston House and 33 - 74 Queens Gardens To inform the Commission of the development briefs being produced for Council owned City Centre regeneration sites. 9 Greening the City Update 75 - 76 To provide updated information on the progress of identifying and implementing schemes to improve the appearance of the City Centre. 10 Exclusion of the Press and Public To consider the exclusion of the press and public for the items listed as exempt. EXEMPT ITEMS 11 Greening the City OSC Briefing Appendix Information which reveals that the authority proposes (a) to give any enactment a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person; or (b) to make an order or direction unde... Page 4 of 76 Economy and Regeneration Overview and Scrutiny 5th December 2013 PRESENT:- Councillor E. Mann (Chair), Councillor M.H. O’Mullane (Deputy Chair), Councillor S. Armstrong, Councillor S. Chaytor, Councillor J. Conner, Councillor J. Fareham, Councillor D. Gemmell, Councillor K.E. Mathieson, Councillor L. Petrini, Councillor J. Shipley, Councillor C. Thomas. IN ATTENDANCE:- F. Harbord (Scrutiny Officer), N. Stocks (Democratic Services Officer), M. Relph, Assistant Head of Service (City Economy) – Minute 40, L. West (Joint Managing Director of Garthwest and Platform Expo), D. Keel (Joint Managing Director, Trident), J. Connolly and J. Moss (Co-founders, C4Di) – Minute 41 APOLOGIES:- Minute Description/Decision Action No. By/Deadline 37 DECLARATION OF INTEREST No declarations were made in respect of the following items. 38 MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 7th NOVEMBER 2013 Agreed: That the minutes of the meeting of this Commission held on Thursday 7th November, 2013 having been printed and circulated, be taken as read and correctly recorded and be signed by the Chair. NON EXEMPT ITEMS 39 OUTSTANDING ACTION LIST The Scrutiny Officer presented the outstanding action list and updated the Commission on any action taken. Members discussed: (i) concerns that there had been no further update in relation to city centre properties. Members reiterated that this was not acceptable and stated that ultimately, NPS were directed by the Council and as such, the Authority needed to take ownership of the issue; (ii) concerns that the Portfolio Holder for Visitor Destination has been unable to provide any written response, which outlined the timelines for each of the projects that were relevant to the work of this Commission, withinPage his 5 portf of 76olio. Members requested that the matter be referred to the Leader of the Council in lieu of a formal response; (iii) the absence of a report from the Museums Commerciality Task and Finish Panel. A Member stated that the outcome and explanation provided was factually incorrect, as a report had been completed and signed off. Members requested that the relevant report be provided to enable the Commission to review the recommendations and the potential impact on Museums if Leisure Services became part of a wholly owned Council company; and (iv) concerns that there had been no further progression in relation to the pedestrianisation of Lowgate. Members requested that the scheme was addressed as a matter of urgency. Agreed – (a) That the update be noted; (b) That the Commission are disappointed that the (b-d) Scrutiny Portfolio Holder for Visitor Destination has been Officer – FH unable to provide any written response, outlining the timelines for each of the projects within his portfolio that are relevant to the work of this Commission i.e. the City of Culture Bid, Green Port Hull, redevelopment of the Fruit market area, securing of the aircraft carrier as a visitor attraction, establishment of a cruise terminal, an overall plan for the city centre and how it is managed, including Streetscene and public realm and the priorities for funding within the City Plan, as requested at the meeting of 3 October 2013. As such, Members ask that the matter be referred to the Leader of the Council to determine an appropriate resolution; (c) That the Commission do not accept the outcome or explanation regarding their request to receive the report from the Museums Commerciality Task and Finish Panel and request that the relevant report be provided to enable Members to review the recommendations, whilst considering the potential impact on Museums that would result if Leisure Services were to become part of a wholly owned Council company; and (d) That the outstanding action regarding the Lowgate (d) City Pedestrianisation scheme be progressed as a matter Streetscene of urgency. Manager Reason for decisions (b) To enable the Commission to identify priorities which are relevant to the work of this Commission and to ensure that appropriate issues are included within the Commissions Work Programme; Page 6 of 76 (c) To enable Members to review the recommendations, whilst considering the potential impact on Museums that would result if Leisure Services were to become part of a wholly owned Council company; and (d) To ensure that the scheme is progressed, without further delay. 40 THE CITY’S DIGITAL ECONOMY M. Relph, Assistant Head of Service (City Economy), provided a briefing paper which updated Members on the opportunities and challenges for the City’s Digital Economy. The briefing paper provided background information, which facilitated further discussion within the following agenda item and outlined: (i) the connections and dependencies that needed to be considered as part of any support to the sector by either the Council or partners; (ii) that the use of digital technology was a feature of Hull’s City of Culture 2017 programme; (iii) the barriers to innovation and Hull’s development as a ‘Smart City’; and (iv) the context of the City Plan and the Digital Estuary within the context of the Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP). Members were advised that: (i) the Authority had historically attempted to use technology as a tool without a clear understanding of its benefits; and (ii) partner agencies had developed a wealth of experience and a clear perception of how the digital economy fitted in, and provided valid representation and insight into Hull’s Digital Economy. Agreed – that the briefing paper be noted 41 DISCUSSION ITEM – HULL’S DIGITAL ECONOMY L.
Recommended publications
  • Masterworks Architecture at the Masterworks: Royal Academy of Arts Neil Bingham

    Masterworks Architecture at the Masterworks: Royal Academy of Arts Neil Bingham

    Masterworks Architecture at the Masterworks: Royal Academy of Arts Neil Bingham Royal Academy of Arts 2 Contents President’s Foreword 000 Edward Middleton Barry ra (1869) 000 Sir Howard Robertson ra (1958) 000 Paul Koralek ra (1991) 000 Preface 000 George Edmund Street ra (1871) 000 Sir Basil Spence ra (1960) 000 Sir Colin St John Wilson ra (1991) 000 Acknowledgements 000 R. Norman Shaw ra (1877) 000 Donald McMorran ra (1962) 000 Sir James Stirling ra (1991) 000 John Loughborough Pearson ra (1880) 000 Marshall Sisson ra (1963) 000 Sir Michael Hopkins ra (1992) 000 Architecture at the Royal Academy of Arts 000 Alfred Waterhouse ra (1885) 000 Raymond Erith ra (1964) 000 Sir Richard MacCormac ra (1993) 000 Sir Thomas Graham Jackson Bt ra (1896) 000 William Holford ra, Baron Holford Sir Nicholas Grimshaw pra (1994) 000 The Architect Royal Academicians and George Aitchison ra (1898) 000 of Kemp Town (1968) 000 Michael Manser ra (1994) 000 Their Diploma Works 000 George Frederick Bodley ra (1902) 000 Sir Frederick Gibberd ra (1969) 000 Eva M. Jiricna ra (1997) 000 Sir William Chambers ra (1768, Foundation Sir Aston Webb ra (1903) 000 Sir Hugh Casson pra (1970) 000 Ian Ritchie ra (1998) 000 Member, artist’s presentation) 000 John Belcher ra (1909) 000 E. Maxwell Fry ra (1972) 000 Will Alsop ra (2000) 000 George Dance ra (1768, Foundation Member, Sir Richard Sheppard ra (1972) 000 Gordon Benson ra (2000) 000 no Diploma Work) 000 Sir Reginald Blomfield ra (1914) 000 H. T. Cadbury-Brown ra (1975) 000 Piers Gough ra (2001) 000 John Gwynn ra (1768, Foundation Member, Sir Ernest George ra (1917) 000 no Diploma Work) 000 Ernest Newton ra (1919) 000 Ernö Goldfinger ra (1975) 000 Sir Peter Cook ra (2003) 000 Thomas Sandby ra (1768, Foundation Member, Sir Edwin Lutyens pra (1920) 000 Sir Philip Powell ra (1977) 000 Zaha Hadid ra (2005) 000 bequest from great-grandson) 000 Sir Giles Gilbert Scott ra (1922) 000 Peter Chamberlin ra (1978) 000 Eric Parry ra (2006) 000 William Tyler ra (1768, Foundation Member, Sir John J.
  • Urban Redevelopment.Indb

    Urban Redevelopment.Indb

    Wildman, Charlotte. "The Cathedral That Never Was?." Urban Redevelopment and Modernity in Liverpool and Manchester, 1918–39. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. 167–189. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 29 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474257398.0016>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 29 September 2021, 01:45 UTC. Copyright © Charlotte Wildman 2016. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 6 Th e Cathedral Th at Never Was? Th e Catholic Church in Liverpool also responded to urban redevelopment with ambition and innovation. As architectural expert Charles Reilly announced to readers of the New York Times in 1930, ‘ Liverpool is starting to build a second and even greater cathedral. Her new project, indeed, calls for the greatest cathedral in the world next to St Peter ’ s at Rome. ’1 Designed by Edwin Lutyens, ‘ arguably the greatest British architect of the twentieth century, ’ the planned Catholic cathedral, named the Metropolitan Cathedral of Christ, was intended to be second largest in the world and expected to cost £ 3 million.2 Th e impact of the cathedral on the city and beyond was highly anticipated: ‘ I see the cathedral then, like a rainbow across the skies radiating the true and the good ’ , wrote one prominent member of Liverpool Archdiocese.3 For the Archdiocese and, in particular for the cathedral ’ s pioneer, Archbishop of Liverpool Richard Downey (1881 – 1953), it represented an opportunity to transform the way in which Catholicism was seen both in Britain and beyond.
  • C20 CA Project Short Reports on Potential Conservation Areas

    C20 CA Project Short Reports on Potential Conservation Areas

    Conservation Areas Project Potential Conservation Areas Short Reports December 2017 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction Section 10.3.2 of the Brief for the Twentieth Century Society Conservation Areas Project requires the research consultants ‘to prepare summaries of around 50 areas that have potential for future conservation area status, providing information on their location, the architect, date of construction, borough, one or two images and a short paragraph about the site’. These short reports are listed in Section 2.0 below, and the full reports follow, in numerical order. All the short reports follow a standard format which was agreed by the Steering Group for the Project (see appendix 3 of the Scoping Report). The reports are intended principally as identifiers not as full descriptions. In line with the research strategy, they are the result of a desk-based assessment. The historic information is derived mainly from secondary sources and the pictures are taken largely from the Web (and no copyright clearance for future publication has been obtained). No specific boundaries are suggested for the potential conservation areas because any more formal proposals clearly need to be based on thorough research and site inspection. 2.0 List of Potential Conservation Areas Historic County Area Name Local Planning Record Authority Number Berkshire Blossom Avenue, Theale West Berkshire 01 Buckinghamshire Energy World Milton Keynes 02 Buckinghamshire Woolstone Milton Keynes 03 Cheshire The Brow, Runcorn Halton 04 Devon Sladnor Park Torquay 05 Dorset
  • RIBA Conservation Register

    RIBA Conservation Register

    Conservation 17 If you are looking to commission work on a heritage building, you will need an architect with specific skills and experience. Our register of specialists encompasses all aspects of historic building conservation, repair and maintenance. For more information visit: www.architecture.com/findanarchitect/ FindaConservationArchitect by Tier RIBA Conservation Register 287 RICHARD BIGGINS DENIS COGAN ROISIN DONNELLY Frederick Gibberd Partnership, 117-121 Curtain Road, Kelly and Cogan Architects, 28 Westminster Road, Stoneygate, Consarc Design Group Ltd, The Gas Office, 4 Cromac Quay, Specialist Conservation Architect London EC2A 3AD Leicester LE2 2EG /81 North King Street, Smithfield, Dublin 7, Belfast BT7 2JD T 0207 739 3400 Republic of Ireland T 028 9082 8400 GIBSON (SCA) [email protected] T +353 (0) 1 872 1295/ 07557 981826 [email protected] ALEXANDER www.gibberd.com deniscogan@kelly andcogan.ie www.consarc-design.co.uk SCA CHRISTOPHER BLACKBURN JULIET COLMAN SIMON DOUCH SCA Has authoritative knowledge of Burnside House, Shaftoe Crescent, Hexham, JCCH, Kirby House, Pury End, Towcester, Northants NN12 7NX HOK International, The Qube, 90 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4EZ conservation practice and extensive Northumberland NE46 3DS T 01327 811453 T 020 7898 5119 T 01434 600454 / 07543 272451 [email protected] [email protected] experience of working with historic [email protected] www.jcch-architect.co.uk www.hok.com www.christopherblackburn-architect.co.uk buildings. CHRISTOPHER
  • Understanding Post-War Architecture

    Understanding Post-War Architecture

    Understanding Post-War Architecture The Twentieth Century Key Events 1916-20. Inflation pushes up the cost of building materials. Additionally shortages of materials encourage the use of new materials such as Crittall windows, sand-lime bricks, and prefabrication (steel and concrete systems) for council housing. These experiments were to be developed further after the Second World War, eg. No Fines housing, first tried in Britain in 1924 was widely used by (especially) Wimpeys (builders) after WWII. 1919. Housing (Addison) Act promises ‘homes for heroes’. 1921. Cut backs in public expenditure (Geddes Axe) as post-war boom turns to depression. It can be argued that the general economic malaise of the 1920s had a greater effect on British building than the Great Depression of 1929-33 which was devastating in localised areas, notably the NE and Wales. 1924. Empire Exhibition, Wembley (stadium opened the previous year). 1925. New Ways, Northampton, by Peter Behrens is first Modern Movement house, for W. Bassett Loake, who had previously commissioned C. R. Mackintosh to modernise a house in Northampton. 1926. General Strike. 1927. Le Corbusier’s Vers Une Architecture is translated into English as Towards a New Architecture. With his houses for the Weissenhofseidlung exhibition in Stuttgart, Le Corbusier defines ‘five points’ of modern architecture: free plan, free façade, flat roof, strip windows and pilotis. 1928. The first talkies in Britain (Al Jolson in The Singing Fool the first wide release here). Cinematograph Act requires cinemas to show a quota of British films. Film makers, distributors and exhibitors begin to combine and large companies (Gaumont, ABC, later Odeon and Granada) come to dominate the market, building big new super-cinemas.

  • The Failure of the Preservation of Brutalism in Birmingham, England

    The Failure of the Preservation of Brutalism in Birmingham, England Kelsey Dootson B.A. in History Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri, 2016 Thesis Committee: Sheila Crane, chair Richard Guy Wilson Andrew Johnston A Thesis Presented to Faculty of the Department of Architectural History of the School of Architecture Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Architectural History School of Architecture UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville, Virginia May 2018 2 Table of Contents List of Illustrations ..................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................... 4 Introductions ............................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1: Destruction and Reconstruction ................................................................................ 10 Chapter 2: Brutalism in Birmingham ......................................................................................... 23 Chapter 3: Preservation in the City ............................................................................................ 37 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 47 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................
  • Nuneaton Town Centre Conservation Area March 2009

    Nuneaton Town Centre Conservation Area March 2009

    Nuneaton Town Centre Conservation Area March 2009 Appraisal and Management Proposals Draft for Public Consultation PART ONE : THE APPRAISAL 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SUMMARY OF SPECIAL INTEREST 2.1 Principal features 2.2 Narrative Summary 3.0 ASSESSING SPECIAL INTEREST 3.1 Location and Setting 3.2 Origins and Historic Development 3.3 Introduction to Character Areas 3.4 Character Area 1 : Commercial Centre Principal features Location and Topography Uses Historic Development The Market Place Queens Road Abbey Street Bridge Street Newdegate Street Stafford Street Coventry Street Townscape and Architectural Character The Market Place & Bridge Street Queens Road Abbey Street Newdegate Street Coventry Street Negative Features 3.5 Character Area 2: Civic and Administrative Centre 3.6 Character Area 3 : Riversley Park, and Coton Road 3.7 Character Area 4 : Park Fringe 3.8 Character Area 5 : The Church, Vicarage & Schools PART TWO : FUTURE CARE 4.0 MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Suggested Conservation Area Boundary Changes 4.3 Management Proposals 2 PART 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SUMMARY OF SPECIAL INTEREST Conservation areas are designated under the 2.1 Principal Features of Special provisions of Section 69 of the Planning (Listed Architectural and Historic Interest2 Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 where they are defined as ‘[areas] of special • Street pattern of the medieval town, part of architectural and historic interest the character which has its origins in the Anglo- Saxon pre- and appearance of which it is desirable to urban village settlement of Eaton. preserve or enhance” • Large, later infilled market place attesting the commercial importance of the medieval town to This document is an appraisal of the special its founders the Priory of St Mary and its parent architectural and historic interest of the abbey of Fontevrault in France.
  • Intro to Edinburgh

    Intro to Edinburgh

    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/3216 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. ARCHITECTURE IN TENSION: An Examination of the Position of the Architect in the Private and Public Sectors, Focusing on the Training and Careers of Sir Basil Spence (1907-1976) and Sir Donald Gibson (1908-1991). Volume One of Two Volumes Sarah Helen Walford M.A.(Dist.) Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History of Art University of Warwick May 2009 CONTENTS Volume One Acknowledgements……....................……………………………………..........……i Abstract................................................................................................................ii Abbreviations Used………………………………………………….........................iii List of illustrations……………………………………………………........................v Introduction ………………………………………………………………...............1 1. A Profession Divided: The origins and growth of the schism between the sectors, and the role of the Association of Architects Surveyors and Technical Assistants……………..…...........8 1.1. A Union Forms: The Architects’ and Surveyors’ Assistants’ Professional Union, and the Association of Architects Surveyors and Technical Assistants………............….10 1.2. AASTA’s Relationship with the Royal Institute of British Architects……………………..........……………............................16 2. Spence and Gibson: Their early years and the beginnings of divergence……………………………………………………………..…….33 2.1. Basil Urwin Spence: Formative years, training and early Career………………………………………..………………............36 2.1a. Bombay, 1907-1919………………………………………....36 2.1b. Edinburgh, 1919-1931……………………………………....42 2.1c.
  • Artist Commission, Harlow 2018-19

    Artist Commission, Harlow 2018-19

    Artist Commission, Harlow 2018-19 Introduction For ten years Essex Cultural Diversity Project (ECDP) has been working closely with many different organisations, bringing together artists, museums, libraries, performers and writers with local authorities and commissioners to significantly improve and enhance the artistic and cultural diversity of the area, ensure that excellence is thriving, and that cultural integration and understanding is supported and enhanced through arts and cultural activity. This is more important today than it has ever been since ECDP was established. ECDP is now an Arts Council National Portfolio Organisation (NPO) with a key role to play across Essex and the East of England in continuing to support diversity in arts and cultural practice. Our key strategy to achieve this is through a programme of exciting but challenging place-based commissions for artists to work in areas of Essex where there are opportunities to explore diversity through their practice. For 2018-19 we are focusing on five towns/places where community engagement in the arts has been traditionally low – Canvey Island, Harlow, Basildon, Grays and Jaywick Sands. Harlow is the focus of this commission. The Harlow Commission is being undertaken in partnership with Essex County Council and Harlow Art Trust. Harlow Town Introduction Harlow is a large town in the north west of Essex close to Hertfordshire border with a population of over 80,000, built as one of a number of New Towns after World War II to ease overcrowding in London. The masterplan for the new town was drawn up by Sir Frederick Gibberd and included housing for around 60,000 people to the west of an existing Essex village called Harlow.

  • Queens Gardens Heritage Appraisal

    Queens Gardens Heritage Appraisal Prepared for Hull City Council July 2019 Executive Summary A Brief Overview of the Report Queens Gardens was constructed in 1935 as a new park at the heart of the city. The park was built on the site of Queens Dock, once the largest dock in Britain. The site has provided a focal point for the people of Hull for over 230 years since the dock opened in 1778. The gardens were built to provide refuge from the noise, smell, grime and bustle of business life. Queens Gardens was refurbished and lowered by architect Frederick Gibberd in 1950 to create a dock like character. Located within the city centre, Queens Gardens is sited adjacent to Hull College and enjoyed by hundreds of thousands of visitors a year. This report has been prepared to support and guide proposed improvement and enhancement works to Queens Gardens. It documents Queens Gardens’ heritage assets, analysing hard and soft landscape elements, existing features and historic map information. The Heritage Appraisal brings together Fiona Green’s historic landscape research with our own site analysis, presenting the findings through appropriate illustrations, diagrams and written text. Revision Description By Chk. Date - First Draft for comment and approval CM LHu 30.07.19 A Revised following receipt of comments from HCC SH LHu 04.11.19 2 Executive Summary Section 2 - Appraisal of Historic Designed Landscape 3 The Overall Significance of the Site Heritage Significance • Queens Gardens is of considerable interest having been re- designed to its present form by Frederick Gibberd, one of England’s most distinguished 20th-century architects and landscape architects.
  • Architecture of Edwin Maxwell Fry and Jane Drew Ashgate Studies in Architecture Series

    Architecture of Edwin Maxwell Fry and Jane Drew Ashgate Studies in Architecture Series

    THE ARCHITECTURE OF EDWIN MAXWELL FRY AND JANE DREW Ashgate Studies in Architecture Series SERIES EDITOR: EAMONN CANNIFFE, MANCHESTER SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY, UK The discipline of Architecture is undergoing subtle transformation as design awareness permeates our visually dominated culture. Technological change, the search for sustainability and debates around the value of place and meaning of the architectural gesture are aspects which will affect the cities we inhabit. This series seeks to address such topics, both theoretically and in practice, through the publication of high quality original research, written and visual. Other titles in this series The Architectural Capriccio Memory, Fantasy and Invention Lucien Steil ISBN 978 1 4094 3191 6 The Architecture of Pleasure British Amusement Parks 1900–1939 Josephine Kane ISBN 978 1 4094 1074 4 No Matter: Theories and Practices of the Ephemeral in Architecture Anastasia Karandinou ISBN 978 1 4094 6628 4 The Challenge of Emulation in Art and Architecture Between Imitation and Invention David Mayernik ISBN 978 1 4094 5767 1 Building Transatlantic Italy Architectural Dialogues with Postwar America Paolo Scrivano ISBN 978 1 4724 1483 0 Forthcoming titles in this series The Architecture of Edwin Maxwell Fry and Jane Drew Twentieth Century Architecture, Pioneer Modernism and the Tropics Iain Jackson and Jessica Holland ISBN 978 1 4094 5198 3 The Architecture of Edwin Maxwell Fry and Jane Drew Twentieth Century Architecture, Pioneer Modernism and the Tropics Iain Jackson Liverpool School of Architecture, University of Liverpool Jessica Holland Liverpool School of Architecture, University of Liverpool © Iain Jackson and Jessica Holland 2014 All rights reserved.
  • Conserving the 20Th Century's Landscape Design

    Conserving the 20Th Century's Landscape Design

    SUMMARY Status of the conservation and protection of landscapes of the mid and late 20th century; Raising awareness of issues; Approaches and practical challenges to conservation; Stimulating action. Dr Jan Haenraets Proceedings under the scientific direction of Dr. Jan Haenraets The conference on ‘Landscapes of the Recent Future: Conserving the Twentieth Century’s Landscape Design Legacy’ was organised with the objective to share recent findings and experiences in relation to the status of the conservation and protection of landscapes of the mid and late Twentieth Century. In doing so it was the intention to assist with raising awareness of key issues and make expertise available about practical approaches and challenges for the conservation of such sites, this with the objective that the conference can contribute towards stimulating action to protect and conserve the sites of the recent future. The starting point is that more of such action and awareness is needed. This conclusion is based on various findings, but as a simplified example, we notice from publications from the recent years on the subject of architecture and landscapes of the recent past (or recent future, as used in the title of the conference) that designed landscapes from the recent past appear to have gained recognition as significant heritage. However, at the same time we see that significant sites from the mid and late Twentieth Century are being demolished, are condemned or endangered. Such as for example of Gibberd’s Water Gardens in Harlow New Town, which was relocated even though it was listed by English Heritage. To achieve these objectives the conference started with an introduction to the conference theme by Dr Jan Haenraets about the need for nurturing greater support, understanding and stewardship for landscapes of the recent future.