DOCSLIB.ORG

Tracks 501, 601, 503 Review of Aboriginal Heritage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tracks 501, 601, 503 Review of Aboriginal Heritage ARTHUR-PIEMAN CONSERVATION AREA Tracks 501, 601, 503 Review of Aboriginal Heritage DPIPWE 1 Acknowledgements: Fiona Hamilton, Aboriginal Heritage Consultant and Project Manager Dr Johan Kamminga, Archaeologist Reg Burgess, Aboriginal Heritage Officer Dr Keith Deverell – GIS, Mapping and Imagery Greg Jackman – Archaeologist © State of Tasmania 2021 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Contents Map of Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area ..................................................................................... 3 Executive summary ....................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 11 Project background .................................................................................................................. 11 Study process .......................................................................................................................... 12 Constraints and limitations ....................................................................................................... 13 Environmental setting .................................................................................................................. 14 Palaeoenvironment ................................................................................................................. 14 Geology ................................................................................................................................... 15 Physiography and land systems .............................................................................................. 16 Climate and rainfall .................................................................................................................. 18 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................... 19 Aboriginal food resources ........................................................................................................ 19 Aboriginal history ........................................................................................................................ 21 Ethnohistorical outline .............................................................................................................. 21 Historical descriptions of local country and culture ................................................................... 22 European land-use .................................................................................................................. 27 Aboriginal heritage desktop review .............................................................................................. 33 Previous heritage studies ........................................................................................................ 33 Aboriginal heritage field survey .................................................................................................... 39 Survey method ........................................................................................................................ 39 Survey results.......................................................................................................................... 39 Cultural significance assessment ................................................................................................ 45 Assessment frameworks.......................................................................................................... 45 Previous assessments ............................................................................................................. 46 Current assessment ................................................................................................................ 47 Impact assessment ..................................................................................................................... 53 Proposed activity ..................................................................................................................... 53 Forms of potential impact ........................................................................................................ 57 Assessment of potential impacts on identified values ............................................................... 58 Legal requirements ...................................................................................................................... 61 Tracks 501, 601 and 503 Aboriginal cultural heritage report, APCA Page 1 Statutory context...................................................................................................................... 61 Summary of key findings ............................................................................................................ 67 Survey results.......................................................................................................................... 67 Potential impacts ..................................................................................................................... 67 Further investigations .............................................................................................................. 68 Management planning ............................................................................................................. 69 Aboriginal community engagement .......................................................................................... 70 Public Environment Report Advice ............................................................................................... 71 2.1 Feasible alternatives ...................................................................................................... 71 2.2 Description of the environment ...................................................................................... 73 2.3 Relevant impacts ........................................................................................................... 74 2.4 Proposed avoidance and mitigation measures ............................................................... 78 2.5 Residual impacts/proposed offsets ................................................................................ 81 2.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 82 References ................................................................................................................................. 83 Appendices ................................................................................................................................. 88 Appendix A - Glossary ............................................................................................................. 88 Tracks 501, 601 and 503 Aboriginal cultural heritage report, APCA Page 2 Map of Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area Tracks 501, 601 and 503 Aboriginal cultural heritage report, APCA Page 3 Executive summary The Tasmanian Government is investigating options for re-instigating access by off- road vehicles (ORVs) to three currently closed tracks (501, 503 and 601) between Sandy Cape and Pieman Heads within the Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area (APCA). The southern portion of Track 601 extends into the adjoining Pieman River State Reserve. Tracks 501, 601 and the western 2km of 503 are situated within the boundary of the Western Tasmania Aboriginal Cultural Landscape (WTACL), which was entered on the Commonwealth Government’s National Heritage List (NHL) in 2013 on account of its high Aboriginal heritage values. A referral under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBCA) regarding the proposed action to re-open the affected tracks and undertake allied mitigation works was submitted in 2017. A response was received that the proposed activity was a controlled action requiring assessment and approval through the preparation of a Public Environment Report (PER), the content of which was set out in guidelines issued by the (then) Commonwealth Department of Environment and Energy (DOEE). The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) commissioned an Aboriginal Heritage Assessment of the proposal to re-open and undertake selected mitigation works on Tracks 501, 503 and 601. Aboriginal community consultation was not part of the study brief, but is proposed to be undertaken separately if the proposal proceeds. DPIPWE Statement of Intent Due to the significance and complexity of the cultural values, their spatial extent and the dynamic landforms of the area, determining how to allow for ORV access while ensuring protection of the values of the WTACL is challenging and complex. To assist in understanding how best to address the PER guidelines, the Parks and Wildlife Service (PWS) commissioned an independent cultural heritage assessment of the immediate area traversed by Tracks 501, 503 and 601. That work was described in a background report provided to the PWS that contains the results of a desktop analysis and on-ground field survey of the Aboriginal cultural heritage values of Tracks 501, 503 and 601, an assessment of the potential impacts to those values of the proposed activity, and findings with respect to the proposed mitigation measures and the PER guidelines. This report is derived from the background report. The findings contained
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Management in the Anthony–Pieman Hydropower Scheme
    Water management in the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme Pieman Sustainability Review June 2015 FACT SHEET Background The Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme provides a highly valued and reliable source of electricity. The total water storage of the hydropower scheme is 512 gigalitres and the average annual generation is 2367 gigawatt hours. Construction of the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme has resulted in creation of water storages (lakes) and alterations to the natural flow of existing rivers and streams. The Pieman Sustainability Review is a review of operational, social and environmental aspects of the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme that are influenced by Hydro Tasmania. This fact sheet elaborates on water management issues presented in the summary report, available at http://www.hydro.com.au/pieman-sustainability-review Water storage levels in the Anthony–Pieman Water levels have been monitored at these storages since hydropower scheme their creation in stages between 1981 and 1991. The Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme includes eight Headwater storages: Lake Mackintosh and Lake water storages, classified as headwater storages (Lakes Murchison Mackintosh and Murchison), diversion storages (Lakes Lakes Mackintosh and Murchison are the main headwater Henty and Newton and White Spur Pond) and run-of-river storages for the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme. storages (Lakes Rosebery, Plimsoll and Pieman). Lakes The water level fluctuates over the entire operating range Murchison, Henty and Newton and White Spur Pond do not from Normal Minimum Operating Level (NMOL) to Full release water directly to a power station; rather they are Supply Level (FSL) (Figures 1, 2). used to transfer water to other storages within the scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Murchison 2040 Plan
    Sustainable Murchison 2040 Community Plan Regional Framework Plan Prepared for Waratah-Wynyard Council, Circular Head Council, West Coast Council, King Island Council and Burnie City Council Date 21 November 2016 Geografi a Geografia Pty Ltd • Demography • Economics • Spatial Planning +613 9329 9004 | [email protected] | www.geografia.com.au Supported by the Tasmanian Government Geografia Pty Ltd • Demography • Economics • Spatial Planning +613 9329 9004 | [email protected] | www.geografia.com.au 571 Queensberry Street North Melbourne VIC 3051 ABN: 33 600 046 213 Disclaimer This document has been prepared by Geografia Pty Ltd for the councils of Waratah-Wynyard, Circular Head, West Coast, and King Island, and is intended for their use. It should be read in conjunction with the Community Engagement Report, the Regional Resource Analysis and Community Plan. While every effort is made to provide accurate and complete information, Geografia does not warrant or represent that the information contained is free from errors or omissions and accepts no responsibility for any loss, damage, cost or expense (whether direct or indirect) incurred as a result of a person taking action in respect to any representation, statement, or advice referred to in this report. Executive Summary The Sustainable Murchison Community Plan belongs to the people of Murchison, so that they may plan and implement for a sustainable future. Through one voice and the cooperative action of the community, business and government, Murchison can be a place where aspirations are realised. This plan is the culmination of extensive community and stakeholder consultation, research and analysis. It sets out the community vision, principles and strategic objectives for Murchison 2040.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Waterways Report
    Annual Waterways Report Pieman Catchment Water Assessment Branch 2009 ISSN: 1835-8489 Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries and Water, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIW has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries and Water, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Department of Primary Industries and Water Pieman Catchment Contents 1. About the catchment 2. Streamflow and Water Allocation 3. River Health 1. About the catchment The Pieman catchment drains a land mass of more than 4,100 km 2 stretching from about Lake St Clair in the Central Highlands west more than 90 km to Granville Harbour on the rugged West Coast of Tasmania. Major rivers draining the catchment are the Savage, Donaldson and Whyte rivers in the lower catchment, the Pieman, Huskisson rivers in the middle catchment and the Mackintosh, Murchison and Anthony rivers in the upper catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices of Aboriginal Tasmania Ningina Tunapri Education
    voices of aboriginal tasmania ningenneh tunapry education guide Written by Andy Baird © Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery 2008 voices of aboriginal tasmania ningenneh tunapry A guide for students and teachers visiting curricula guide ningenneh tunapry, the Tasmanian Aboriginal A separate document outlining the curricula links for exhibition at the Tasmanian Museum and the ningenneh tunapry exhibition and this guide is Art Gallery available online at www.tmag.tas.gov.au/education/ Suitable for middle and secondary school resources Years 5 to 10, (students aged 10–17) suggested focus areas across the The guide is ideal for teachers and students of History and Society, Science, English and the Arts, curricula: and encompasses many areas of the National Primary Statements of Learning for Civics and Citizenship, as well as the Tasmanian Curriculum. Oral Stories: past and present (Creation stories, contemporary poetry, music) Traditional Life Continuing Culture: necklace making, basket weaving, mutton-birding Secondary Historical perspectives Repatriation of Aboriginal remains Recognition: Stolen Generation stories: the apology, land rights Art: contemporary and traditional Indigenous land management Activities in this guide that can be done at school or as research are indicated as *classroom Activites based within the TMAG are indicated as *museum Above: Brendon ‘Buck’ Brown on the bark canoe 1 voices of aboriginal tasmania contents This guide, and the new ningenneh tunapry exhibition in the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, looks at the following
    [Show full text]
  • Macquarie Harbour
    Tasmanian West Coast Foray Part 1 Macquarie Harbour 100nm. Add another 22 when your Gale force winds, driving rain, cold temperatures, a small starting point is at Three Hummock Island. So one or even two stops can sprinkling of sunny days, and all this in late summer… Any be made along the way. takers for a foray down the West Coast of Tasmania? This is We studied two anchorage guides where CHRISTINE DANGER is sailing us over two issues. which are our bibles: Cruising Tasmania by J Brettingham-Moore, and Tasmanian Anchorage Guide published by the Royal Yacht Club of oming down the west coast, Our expedition started from So over two articles, we will share Tasmania. We talked to Tasmanian even during the so-called Melbourne in late February. We with you the sites we visited and friends who know the area well and C best season, is not for the sailed west to Apollo Bay, then south impressions we formed. The first picked the brains of cray fishermen to faint hearted. It is committal, it is to King Island and the Hunter Group, focuses on Macquarie Harbour, the find out about anchorages they use The coast is quite scenic: a mix of TOP: Strahan with its old buildings challenging, but when it all goes and there we waited for the right second on Port Davey. along the coast. There is a wealth of scrub, sand dunes, rocky outcrops … a welcome sight after many smoothly on a well-equipped boat, conditions to start our descent. It did knowledge out there and people are hours at sea.
    [Show full text]
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col
    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
    [Show full text]
  • Western Explorer
    Travelling times and distances, based on safe speed and good road conditions Due to the remote and rugged Experience Tasmania’s Smithton – Marrawah: terrain of this region, some unique western wilderness roads are narrow and winding. 45 minutes / 49 km / 90 kmh / sealed The Western Explorer route links Stanley in the North West WESTERN Marrawah – Arthur River: Many of these roads are to Strahan on the West Coast and takes you through some 10 minutes / 12 km / 80 kmh / sealed unsealed and therefore of the State’s most beautiful and isolated areas. susceptible to the varying EXPLORER Road travellers can expect a unique experience, exploring Arthur River – Couta Rocks: weather conditions. 20 minutes / 18 km / 70 kmh / unsealed a region steeped in early mining history, surrounded by wilderness and remarkable scenery. The landscape is wild Couta Rocks – Blackwater Road: West Coast Wilderness Drive Smithton to Strahan and rugged with a climate that can vary from snow to 15 minutes / 16km / 70 kmh / unsealed brilliant sunshine in one day. Blackwater Road – Lindsay River: During wet weather, roads This guide provides you with valuable information about 20 minutes / 21 km / 70 kmh / unsealed can become slippery, flooded or potholed. Unsealed roads the road conditions between Stanley and Strahan, however Lindsay River – Corinna: can become extremely dusty be prepared: If you break down, the roads are isolated and 90 minutes / 57 km / 40 kmh / unsealed during dry periods. you may experience a long delay before another traveller or assistance comes. Arthur River – Corinna: For your safety and comfort 2 hrs 15 minutes. it is wise to check road and Arthur River – Zeehan: weather conditions before 3 hrs 15 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Geoconservation Values
    Geoconservation Values of the TWWHA and Adjacent Areas 3.0 GEOCONSERVATION AND GEOHERITAGE VALUES OF THE TWWHA AND ADJACENT AREAS 3.1 Introduction This section provides an assessment of the geoconservation (geoheritage) values of the TWWHA, with particular emphasis on the identification of geoconservation values of World Heritage significance. This assessment is based on: • a review (Section 2.3.2) of the geoconservation values cited in the 1989 TWWHA nomination (DASETT 1989); • a review of relevant new scientific data that has become available since 1989 (Section 2.4); and: • the use of contemporary procedures for rigorous justification of geoconservation significance (see Section 2.2) in terms of the updated World Heritage Criteria (UNESCO 1999; see this report Section 2.3.3). In general, this review indicates that the major geoconservation World Heritage values of the TWWHA identified in 1989 are robust and remain valid. However, only a handful of individual sites or features in the TWWHA are considered to have World Heritage value in their own right, as physical features considered in isolation (eg, Exit Cave). In general it is the diversity, extent and inter-relationships between numerous features, sites, areas or processes that gives World Heritage significance to certain geoheritage “themes” in the TWWHA (eg, the "Ongoing Natural Geomorphic and Soil Process Systems" and “Late Cainozoic "Ice Ages" and Climate Change Record” themes). This "wholistic" principle under-pinned the 1989 TWWHA nomination (DASETT 1989, p. 27; see this report Section 2.3.2), and is strongly supported by the present review (see discussion and justification of this principle in Section 2.2).
    [Show full text]
  • Nowhere Else on Earth
    Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values Environment Tasmania is a not-for-profit conservation council dedicated to the protection, conservation and rehabilitation of Tasmania’s natural environment. Australia’s youngest conservation council, Environment Tasmania was established in 2006 and is a peak body representing over 20 Tasmanian environment groups. Prepared for Environment Tasmania by Dr Karen Parsons of Aquenal Pty Ltd. Report citation: Parsons, K. E. (2011) Nowhere Else on Earth: Tasmania’s Marine Natural Values. Report for Environment Tasmania. Aquenal, Tasmania. ISBN: 978-0-646-56647-4 Graphic Design: onetonnegraphic www.onetonnegraphic.com.au Online: Visit the Environment Tasmania website at: www.et.org.au or Ocean Planet online at www.oceanplanet.org.au Partners: With thanks to the The Wilderness Society Inc for their financial support through the WildCountry Small Grants Program, and to NRM North and NRM South. Front Cover: Gorgonian fan with diver (Photograph: © Geoff Rollins). 2 Waterfall Bay cave (Photograph: © Jon Bryan). Acknowledgements The following people are thanked for their assistance The majority of the photographs in the report were with the compilation of this report: Neville Barrett of the generously provided by Graham Edgar, while the following Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS) at the additional contributors are also acknowledged: Neville University of Tasmania for providing information on key Barrett, Jane Elek, Sue Wragge, Chris Black, Jon Bryan, features of Tasmania’s marine
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry of Darwin Glass and Target Rocks from Darwin Crater, Tasmania, Australia
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 43, Nr 3, 479–496 (2008) AUTHOR’S Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org PROOF Geochemistry of Darwin glass and target rocks from Darwin crater, Tasmania, Australia Kieren T. HOWARD School of Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia Present address: Impacts and Astromaterials Research Centre, Department of Mineralogy, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 1 March 2007; revision accepted 25 July 2007) Abstract–Darwin glass formed about 800,000 years ago in western Tasmania, Australia. Target rocks at Darwin crater are quartzites and slates (Siluro-Devonian, Eldon Group). Analyses show 2 groups of glass, Average group 1 is composed of: SiO2 (85%), Al2O3 (7.3%), TiO2 (0.05%), FeO (2.2%), MgO (0.9%), and K2O (1.8%). Group 2 has lower average SiO2 (81.1%) and higher average Al2O3 (8.2%). Group 2 is enriched in FeO (+1.5%), MgO (+1.3%) and Ni, Co, and Cr. Average Ni (416 ppm), Co (31 ppm), and Cr (162 ppm) in group 2 are beyond the range of sedimentary rocks. Glass and target rocks have concordant REE patterns (La/Lu = 5.9–10; Eu/Eu* = 0.55–0.65) and overlapping trace element abundances. 87Sr/86Sr ratios for the glasses (0.80778–0.81605) fall in the range (0.76481–1.1212) defined by the rock samples. ε-Nd results range from −13.57 to −15.86. Nd model ages range from 1.2–1.9 Ga (CHUR) and the glasses (1.2–1.5 Ga) fall within the range defined by the target samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area Vehicle Tracks Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts
    Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area Vehicle Tracks Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts A Report commissioned by the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service June 2007 Department of Primary Industries and Water ARTHUR-PIEMAN CONSERVATION AREA Vehicle Tracks Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts A Report commissioned by the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service June 2007 Resource Management & Conservation Division Department of Primary Industries and Water Hobart, Tasmania APCA Vehicle Track Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts i __________________________________________________________________________________________ IMPORTANT NOTE This report was commissioned by the Parks and Wildlife Service to assist a process to determine appropriate management of vehicular tracks in Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area. The recommendations in the report are based on an assessment of natural values (geoconservation, flora and fauna) only. They do not take account of cultural values, which are the subject of a separate assessment, and other factors. Decisions concerning management of the vehicle tracks are the responsibility of the Parks and Wildlife Service. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Resource Management and Conservation Division of the Department of Primary Industries and Water prepared this report with input from Michael Comfort, Rolan Eberhard, Richard Schahinger, Chris Sharples and Shaun Thurstans. Comments were received from the following RMC staff: Michael Askey- Doran, Jason Bradbury, Sally Bryant, Stephen Harris, Ian Houshold, Michael Pemberton and Greg Pinkard. Staff from the Parks and Wildlife Service at Arthur River provided assistance in the field and generously shared their collective knowledge. Air photos used in this study were orthorectified by Matt Dell and John Corbett. The Arthur-Pieman Vehicle Tracks Assessment Project was funded by the Natural Heritage Trust through Cradle Coast NRM.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP
    Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania Record 1997/04 Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP A Co-operatively Formulated Plan by Government Agencies, Statutory Bodies and Relevant Land Users for the Mt Read RAP SUMMARY The formulation of this plan by a co-operative committee, comprising representatives from Government Agencies, statutory bodies and relevant land users, is a ‘first’ for Tasmania. The effort by these various parties with an interest in the Mt Read area demonstrates the commitment to protect the area in the absence of any formal reserve. The Mt Read RAP is almost entirely covered by two current mining leases, ML7M/91 over the Henty gold deposit and ML28M/93 associated with the Rosebery silver-lead-zinc mine, and exploration licence EL5/96 held by Renison Limited. The RAP is within the Mt Read Strategic Prospectivity Zone, which means that if the status of the land is changed and this effectively prevents activities on the current mining tenements, then compensation may be payable. The vegetation around Lake Johnston is acknowledged as having exceptionally high conservation and scientific values, which is why a management plan for the area was written in 1992 and adopted by the lessee. There is a need to expand the scope of the previous plan so that all users of the Mt Read area are aware of the need to abide by measures to protect the vegetation. In addition, media reports have generated much interest in the ancient stands of Huon pine growing in one part of the Mt Read RAP. Studies indicate that the existing Huon pine on the site comprises one or a few individuals which may have vegetatively reproduced on the site since the last glaciation.
    [Show full text]