DOCSLIB.ORG

Mineral Resource Potential Assessments of Selected Areas Arthur River to Pieman River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TASMANIA Mineral resource potential assessments of selected areas Arthur River to Pieman River DECEMBER 1990 TASMANIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES QS.K 6930 MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED AREAS ARTHUR RIVER TO PIEMAN RIVER DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES DECEMBER 1990 Scm /- ./ AREAS OF MINERAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT ARTHUR RIVER TO PIEMAN RIVER o 10 20 30 40 km L-_______L- ______~ ______~ ______~' 500,000 5440000mN I .............•.......•..•• .. i················ ..... ....... ....... .1- ............ i 1 5420000mN 5400000mN .. -.-.------------------, - .... -_ .. __ . ---- ! 5380000mN 332000mE 334000mE 336000mE F & FIS CATEGORIES mI Recommended area for proleclion (RAP) ~ Deferred foresl use 1. Thornlon River; 2. Donaldson-Meredllh; 3. Savage River RAP; 4. Ramsay and Yellow Ck RAP; 5. Parsons Hood RAP; 6. Wild Wave RAP; 7. Pedder RAP. Figure 1 1 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 3 DEFINITIONS 3 CONCLUSIONS 4 DATA 6 (a) Geological Maps 6 (b) Geological Summary 8 Older Rocks 8 Palaeozoic and younger rocks 12 Granite 13 References 13 (c) Geophysical Coverage 15 (d) Mineralisation 15 (e) Previous Exploration 16 1) Thornton River DFU area 16 Wild Wave RAP Pedder RAP 2) Donaldson-Meredith DFV area 18 Savage River RAP Ramsay and Yellow Creek RAP Parsons Hood RAP ASSESSMENT 25 (a) Quality of Data 25 (b) Preliminary listing of possible resource models 25 (c) Current mineral resource potential 28 (d) Future mineral resource potential 29 2 Page APPENDIX 1 Maps showing EL, SPL, and ETA 30 coverage 1971-1975, 1976- 1980, 1981-1985, 1986- 1990. APPENDIX 2 Exploration company reports on open file. 31 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Areas of mineral resource assessment Arthur River to Pieman River showing F and FIS categories. Figure 2: Preliminary mineral resource potential map. Figure 3: Maps of geological atlas standard. Figure 4: Regional geology. Figure 5: Supplementary regibnal geology. Figure 6: Depth to granite contours around the Meredith Granite. Figure 7: Airborne magnetic map - total intensity contours. Figure 8: Gravity station coverage (existing and required). Figure 9: Metallic and industrial minerals. Figure 10: Construction material workings. 3 INTRODUCTION This document is one of a series about mineral resource potential in parts of Tasmania. It deals with the mineral potential of a number of areas between the Arthur River and the Pieman River. In the Forests and Forest Industry Strategy each of these areas has been classified either as a 'Recommended Area for Protection (RAP)' or as a 'Deferred Forest Use' area. The assessments presented here are regarded as preliminary. There has been no synthesis or reinterpretation of the results of programmes carried out by mineral exploration companies and others in and around the various areas, nor have all the relevant data from company reports yet been examined . Presentation of material follows the format established in previous volumes in the series with a segment on the available data and a segment on the assessment of that data. Company reports are more fully referenced in this document (see Appx . 1, Appx. 2) than in previous documents. DEFINITIONS ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATION : a mineral resource potential assessment is a product of the circumstances that apply at the time the assessment is made . As the available data, theoretical concepts, exploration techniques, commodity prices and industrial usages which influence mineral resource potential change, so will the assessments . A HIGH MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL exists where the geological characteristics favourable for resource accumulation are known to be present, or where enough of these features are present to support the relevant genetic model and where there is evidence that mineralisation, not necessarily of economic size or grade, has taken place. 4 A MODERATE MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL exists where the geological data suggest that the factors favourable for formation of a class of deposit are present or can be reasonably inferred, or where the geological features of the area show a reasonable degree of fit with those of the deposit class considered. There need not be evidence of mineralisation in the area. A LOW MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL exists where the geological conditions suggest that mineral concentrations are unlikely and that the relevant genetic model cannot be supported. As noted by Taylor and Steven (1983), this requires an element of positive knowledge. A category of UNKNOWN MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL is used in situations where either the geoscientific data base is inadequate to assess the likelihood of the resource accumulation, or the relevant deposit models are so poorly understood that a reasonable assessment cannot be made. This definition is not to be equated with low mineral resource potential, but takes into account a high degree of uncertainty or incompleteness in the available information. CONCLUSIONS There is a range of geological features in th~ Donaldson-Meredith DFU area which have good resource potential. The Timbs Group, especially the Bowry Formation, has high potential for ochre, magnesite, repetitions of the IAlpine anomaly' pyrite-magnetite-copper mineralisation and small repetitions of the Savage River pyrite­ magnetite mineralisation. There is high potential for silica flour where the areas of interest are underlain by the dolomite formations of the Ahrberg Group. These formations also have high potential for dolomite as a resource in its own right since metallic impurities appear to be relatively low. In the mafic-ultramafic complexes there is moderate to high potential for platinum group elements. 5 Carbonate rocks around the Meredith Granite have high potential for skarn and more distal replacement deposits containing tin and tungsten. Vein systems containing tin, tungsten, silver, lead and zinc are known to be associated with the Meredith Granite and there is moderate to high potential for further discoveries. There is also potential for vein and other systems, related to the Pieman Heads Granite and Sandy Cape Granite, to be present in the Rocky Cape association in the western part of the Donaldson-Meredith DFU area and in the Thornton, Wild Wave and Pedder areas. This potential would be substantially enhanced if the granites extend E and NE at relatively shallow depth as recent, unpublished geophysical interpretations indicate . In addition to the resources of high or moderate to high potential, there are resources of low to moderate or moderate potential. These include base metals in sediments, copper associated with tholeiitic basalts and gold in various styles as well as several other resource models. For the resource models identified at this stage the potential of the Thornton, Wild Wave and Pedder areas is low or low to moderate. The apparent absence of carbonate rocks is a majo~ contributing factor to this status. 6 DATA (a) Geological Haps Blissett, A.H. and Gulline, A.B. 1962. Geological Atlas 1 Mile Series, Sheet 50 (7914S), Zeehan. Dep. Mines Tasm. Brown, A.V. 1983. Regional Geology of the Dundas -Mt Lindsay-Mt Ramsay area. Geol.Surv.Tasm. (see also Geol.Surv.Tasm.Bull. 62). Brown, A.V. 1984. Regional geology of the Mt Youngbuck-Magnet area. 1: 25 000. Geol. Surv. Tasm. (see also Geol. Surv. Tasm. Bull. 62) . Gee, R.D .. Gul1ine, A.B., Bravo, A.P., Legge, P.J., Groves, D.l. 1969. Pieman Heads Sheet. Geol.Surv. Tasm. 1 Mile Geol.Map Ser. (Zone 7, No . 42). Groves, D. !. 1973. A century of tin mining at Mt Bischoff, 1871- 1971. Bull.Geo1.Surv.Tasm. 54. Jack, R., Groves D.!. 1965. Geology of the Mt Meredith-Ye11owband Creek area. Tech.Rep.Dep.Mines Tasm . 9. Longman, M.J. and Matthews, W.L. 1962. Geology of the Bluff Point and Trowutta Quadrangles. Tech .Rep.Dep.Mines Tasm. 6. McNeil, R.D. 1961. Geological reconnaissance of the Arthur River Area . Tech.Rep.Dep.Mines Tasm. 5. Reid, A.M . 1923. The Mt Bischoff tin field. Bull.geol.Surv.Tasm. 34. Rio Tinto Australian Exploration Company. 1957. Reconnaissance of northwest Tasmania. 7 Spry, A.H., Ford, R.J. 1957. Reconnaissance of the Corinna-Pieman Heads Area. Proc.Roy . Soc.Tasm. 91. Taylor, B. L . 1955. Asbestos in Tasmania. Geol.Surv.Min.Res. 9. Turner, N.J . , Brown, A.V . , McClenaghan, M.P., Suetrisno, in press . Geological Atlas 1:50 000 Series, Sheet 79l4N, Corinna. Division of Mines and Mineral Resources, Tasmanian Department of Resources and Energy. Urquhart, G. 1966. Magnetite deposits of the Savage River-Rocky River region . Bull.Geol . Surv.Tasm. 48. Ward, L.K. 1911. The Mount Balfour mining field. Bull.Geol.Surv.Tasm. 10. Waterhouse, L.L. 1914 . The Stanley River tinfield. Bull.Geol.Surv.Tasm. 15. Williams, E., Turner, N. J. 1973 . Geological Atlas 1:250 000 , Series, Sheet SK55-3, Burnie. Dep.Mines Tasm. Williams, V. A. 1983. EL43/70 Arthur River, Tasmania. Report on exploration for the year ending 15th October, 1983. CRA Exploration Pty Ltd Dep.Mines Tasm . TCR 83-2036. The 'Burnie' 1:250 000 geological compilation map (Williams and Turner, 1973) from which Fig. 4 is ultimately derived is relatively old and is based on maps of mainly reconnaissance standard and of very uneven quality. The compilation includes the 'Pieman Heads' 1 inch to 1 mile sheet (Gee et al . , 1969) which is a standard geological atlas sheet but it predates the 1:25 000 maps 'Dundas-Mt Lindsay-Mt Ramsay' (Brown 1983) and the 'Mt Youngbuck-Magnet' compilation (Brown, 1984). The 'Burnie' 1:250 000 compilation a l so predates the 'Corinna' 1:50 000 map (Turner et al., in press) which covers much of the southern part of the area of interest. 8 North of AMG 5 404 000 m N and west of AMG 374 000 m E there are no standard geological atlas maps in the area of interest (Fig. 3) . The geology in parts of this region is the poores t known in Tasmania, particularly between Savage River, Mt Frankland and the Arthur River.
Recommended publications
  • Water Management in the Anthony–Pieman Hydropower Scheme

    Water Management in the Anthony–Pieman Hydropower Scheme

    Water management in the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme Pieman Sustainability Review June 2015 FACT SHEET Background The Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme provides a highly valued and reliable source of electricity. The total water storage of the hydropower scheme is 512 gigalitres and the average annual generation is 2367 gigawatt hours. Construction of the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme has resulted in creation of water storages (lakes) and alterations to the natural flow of existing rivers and streams. The Pieman Sustainability Review is a review of operational, social and environmental aspects of the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme that are influenced by Hydro Tasmania. This fact sheet elaborates on water management issues presented in the summary report, available at http://www.hydro.com.au/pieman-sustainability-review Water storage levels in the Anthony–Pieman Water levels have been monitored at these storages since hydropower scheme their creation in stages between 1981 and 1991. The Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme includes eight Headwater storages: Lake Mackintosh and Lake water storages, classified as headwater storages (Lakes Murchison Mackintosh and Murchison), diversion storages (Lakes Lakes Mackintosh and Murchison are the main headwater Henty and Newton and White Spur Pond) and run-of-river storages for the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme. storages (Lakes Rosebery, Plimsoll and Pieman). Lakes The water level fluctuates over the entire operating range Murchison, Henty and Newton and White Spur Pond do not from Normal Minimum Operating Level (NMOL) to Full release water directly to a power station; rather they are Supply Level (FSL) (Figures 1, 2). used to transfer water to other storages within the scheme.
  • Annual Waterways Report

    Annual Waterways Report

    Annual Waterways Report Pieman Catchment Water Assessment Branch 2009 ISSN: 1835-8489 Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries and Water, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIW has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries and Water, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Department of Primary Industries and Water Pieman Catchment Contents 1. About the catchment 2. Streamflow and Water Allocation 3. River Health 1. About the catchment The Pieman catchment drains a land mass of more than 4,100 km 2 stretching from about Lake St Clair in the Central Highlands west more than 90 km to Granville Harbour on the rugged West Coast of Tasmania. Major rivers draining the catchment are the Savage, Donaldson and Whyte rivers in the lower catchment, the Pieman, Huskisson rivers in the middle catchment and the Mackintosh, Murchison and Anthony rivers in the upper catchment.
  • Voices of Aboriginal Tasmania Ningina Tunapri Education

    Voices of Aboriginal Tasmania Ningina Tunapri Education

    voices of aboriginal tasmania ningenneh tunapry education guide Written by Andy Baird © Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery 2008 voices of aboriginal tasmania ningenneh tunapry A guide for students and teachers visiting curricula guide ningenneh tunapry, the Tasmanian Aboriginal A separate document outlining the curricula links for exhibition at the Tasmanian Museum and the ningenneh tunapry exhibition and this guide is Art Gallery available online at www.tmag.tas.gov.au/education/ Suitable for middle and secondary school resources Years 5 to 10, (students aged 10–17) suggested focus areas across the The guide is ideal for teachers and students of History and Society, Science, English and the Arts, curricula: and encompasses many areas of the National Primary Statements of Learning for Civics and Citizenship, as well as the Tasmanian Curriculum. Oral Stories: past and present (Creation stories, contemporary poetry, music) Traditional Life Continuing Culture: necklace making, basket weaving, mutton-birding Secondary Historical perspectives Repatriation of Aboriginal remains Recognition: Stolen Generation stories: the apology, land rights Art: contemporary and traditional Indigenous land management Activities in this guide that can be done at school or as research are indicated as *classroom Activites based within the TMAG are indicated as *museum Above: Brendon ‘Buck’ Brown on the bark canoe 1 voices of aboriginal tasmania contents This guide, and the new ningenneh tunapry exhibition in the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, looks at the following
  • Western Explorer

    Western Explorer

    Travelling times and distances, based on safe speed and good road conditions Due to the remote and rugged Experience Tasmania’s Smithton – Marrawah: terrain of this region, some unique western wilderness roads are narrow and winding. 45 minutes / 49 km / 90 kmh / sealed The Western Explorer route links Stanley in the North West WESTERN Marrawah – Arthur River: Many of these roads are to Strahan on the West Coast and takes you through some 10 minutes / 12 km / 80 kmh / sealed unsealed and therefore of the State’s most beautiful and isolated areas. susceptible to the varying EXPLORER Road travellers can expect a unique experience, exploring Arthur River – Couta Rocks: weather conditions. 20 minutes / 18 km / 70 kmh / unsealed a region steeped in early mining history, surrounded by wilderness and remarkable scenery. The landscape is wild Couta Rocks – Blackwater Road: West Coast Wilderness Drive Smithton to Strahan and rugged with a climate that can vary from snow to 15 minutes / 16km / 70 kmh / unsealed brilliant sunshine in one day. Blackwater Road – Lindsay River: During wet weather, roads This guide provides you with valuable information about 20 minutes / 21 km / 70 kmh / unsealed can become slippery, flooded or potholed. Unsealed roads the road conditions between Stanley and Strahan, however Lindsay River – Corinna: can become extremely dusty be prepared: If you break down, the roads are isolated and 90 minutes / 57 km / 40 kmh / unsealed during dry periods. you may experience a long delay before another traveller or assistance comes. Arthur River – Corinna: For your safety and comfort 2 hrs 15 minutes. it is wise to check road and Arthur River – Zeehan: weather conditions before 3 hrs 15 minutes.
  • A Review of Geoconservation Values

    A Review of Geoconservation Values

    Geoconservation Values of the TWWHA and Adjacent Areas 3.0 GEOCONSERVATION AND GEOHERITAGE VALUES OF THE TWWHA AND ADJACENT AREAS 3.1 Introduction This section provides an assessment of the geoconservation (geoheritage) values of the TWWHA, with particular emphasis on the identification of geoconservation values of World Heritage significance. This assessment is based on: • a review (Section 2.3.2) of the geoconservation values cited in the 1989 TWWHA nomination (DASETT 1989); • a review of relevant new scientific data that has become available since 1989 (Section 2.4); and: • the use of contemporary procedures for rigorous justification of geoconservation significance (see Section 2.2) in terms of the updated World Heritage Criteria (UNESCO 1999; see this report Section 2.3.3). In general, this review indicates that the major geoconservation World Heritage values of the TWWHA identified in 1989 are robust and remain valid. However, only a handful of individual sites or features in the TWWHA are considered to have World Heritage value in their own right, as physical features considered in isolation (eg, Exit Cave). In general it is the diversity, extent and inter-relationships between numerous features, sites, areas or processes that gives World Heritage significance to certain geoheritage “themes” in the TWWHA (eg, the "Ongoing Natural Geomorphic and Soil Process Systems" and “Late Cainozoic "Ice Ages" and Climate Change Record” themes). This "wholistic" principle under-pinned the 1989 TWWHA nomination (DASETT 1989, p. 27; see this report Section 2.3.2), and is strongly supported by the present review (see discussion and justification of this principle in Section 2.2).
  • Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area Vehicle Tracks Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts

    Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area Vehicle Tracks Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts

    Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area Vehicle Tracks Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts A Report commissioned by the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service June 2007 Department of Primary Industries and Water ARTHUR-PIEMAN CONSERVATION AREA Vehicle Tracks Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts A Report commissioned by the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service June 2007 Resource Management & Conservation Division Department of Primary Industries and Water Hobart, Tasmania APCA Vehicle Track Assessment: Geoconservation, Flora and Fauna Values and Impacts i __________________________________________________________________________________________ IMPORTANT NOTE This report was commissioned by the Parks and Wildlife Service to assist a process to determine appropriate management of vehicular tracks in Arthur-Pieman Conservation Area. The recommendations in the report are based on an assessment of natural values (geoconservation, flora and fauna) only. They do not take account of cultural values, which are the subject of a separate assessment, and other factors. Decisions concerning management of the vehicle tracks are the responsibility of the Parks and Wildlife Service. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Resource Management and Conservation Division of the Department of Primary Industries and Water prepared this report with input from Michael Comfort, Rolan Eberhard, Richard Schahinger, Chris Sharples and Shaun Thurstans. Comments were received from the following RMC staff: Michael Askey- Doran, Jason Bradbury, Sally Bryant, Stephen Harris, Ian Houshold, Michael Pemberton and Greg Pinkard. Staff from the Parks and Wildlife Service at Arthur River provided assistance in the field and generously shared their collective knowledge. Air photos used in this study were orthorectified by Matt Dell and John Corbett. The Arthur-Pieman Vehicle Tracks Assessment Project was funded by the Natural Heritage Trust through Cradle Coast NRM.
  • Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP

    Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP

    Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania Record 1997/04 Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP A Co-operatively Formulated Plan by Government Agencies, Statutory Bodies and Relevant Land Users for the Mt Read RAP SUMMARY The formulation of this plan by a co-operative committee, comprising representatives from Government Agencies, statutory bodies and relevant land users, is a ‘first’ for Tasmania. The effort by these various parties with an interest in the Mt Read area demonstrates the commitment to protect the area in the absence of any formal reserve. The Mt Read RAP is almost entirely covered by two current mining leases, ML7M/91 over the Henty gold deposit and ML28M/93 associated with the Rosebery silver-lead-zinc mine, and exploration licence EL5/96 held by Renison Limited. The RAP is within the Mt Read Strategic Prospectivity Zone, which means that if the status of the land is changed and this effectively prevents activities on the current mining tenements, then compensation may be payable. The vegetation around Lake Johnston is acknowledged as having exceptionally high conservation and scientific values, which is why a management plan for the area was written in 1992 and adopted by the lessee. There is a need to expand the scope of the previous plan so that all users of the Mt Read area are aware of the need to abide by measures to protect the vegetation. In addition, media reports have generated much interest in the ancient stands of Huon pine growing in one part of the Mt Read RAP. Studies indicate that the existing Huon pine on the site comprises one or a few individuals which may have vegetatively reproduced on the site since the last glaciation.
  • The Journal of the Australian Speleological Federation AUSTRALIA

    The Journal of the Australian Speleological Federation AUSTRALIA

    CAVES The Journal of the Australian Speleological Federation AUSTRALIA MW-1 Arrakis Revisited Arthur River Magnesite Deposits Personal Protective Equipment Inspection Tom Robinson • Andrew Skinner Boulder Caves of Mount Nicholas No. 186 • SEPTEMBER 2011 F COMING EVENTS S New editor for This list covers events of interest to anyone seriously interested in caves and karst. The list is just that: if you want further information A e-speleo the contact details for each event are included in the list for you to contact directly. The relevant websites and details of other eeT Ian Binnie, the new international and regional events may be listed on the IUS website Meditor of e-speleo. Ian caves http:///www.uis-speleo.org/ or on the ASF website http://www. with Highland Caving Group (HCG) caves.org.au. For international events, the Chair of International and was previously a member of the Commission (Nicholas White, [email protected]) Macquarie University Caving Group may have extra information. This list only covers events in 2011 (MUCG) for some years. Ian is now and the first half of 2012. retired but in a former life was a tele- On the other hand 2013 looks very busy with the next ASF communications planner, working S Conference TAGalong in January at Galong NSW, the ACKMA for Optus. He was a planner for the i rt Conference in May at Waitomo Caves, NZ and the international 3G phone network. (UIS) congress in July at Brno, Czech Republic. Caving and computers seem a good ian cu match for Ian who, under interrogation, confessed to Tuglow being his favourite cave and to ‘… just like being in caves … the magic 2011 takes over.’ September & October Ian foresees little change in e-speleo, and is planning to bring out Jenolan & Wombeyan Caves Volunteer Weekends, 2011: Sycamore War 3-4 four issues a year, to come out between the Caves Australia issues.
  • Alluvial Gold

    Alluvial Gold

    GSHQI\ TASMANIA DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES 1991 MINERAL RESOURCES OFTASMANIA 11 Alluvial gold by R. S. Bottrill B.Sc. (Hons). M.Sc. DIVISION OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES ISBN 0 7246 2083 4 GPO BOX 56, ROSNY PARK, TASMANIA 7018 ISSN 0313-1998 BoTIRILL, R. S. 1991. Alluvial gold. Miner. Resour. Tasm. II. ISBN 0 7246 2083 4 ISSN0313-2043 TECHNICAL EDITOR, E. L. Martin TEXT INpUT, C. M. Humphries Mineral Resources o/Tasmania is a continuation of Geological Survey Minerai Resources ALLUVIAL GOlD 3 CONTENTS Introduction .. 5 1. Mangana-Mathinna-Alberton 5 2. Gladstone-Derby . 5 3. Lisle ....... 5 4. Back Creek-Lefroy 5 5. Beaconsfield 6 6. Moina . ... 6 7. Wynyard .. 6 8. Arthur River 6 9. Corinna-Savage River .. ... 6 10. Ring River-Wilson River 6 11. Lyell-Darwin . ... 7 12. Jane River . 7 13. Cygnet 7 14. Others . .. 7 Discussion . 7 Acknowledgements . ..... 7 References . .... .. 9 Appendix A: Occurrences of alluvial gold in Tasmania . ..... .• •... .11 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Areas of major alluvial gold production in Tasmania ...... ... 4 2. Polished section of a gold grain from the Lisle goldfield, showing a porous I skeletal structure . 8 3. Polished section of a gold grain from the Lisle goldfield, showing a rim of silver-depleted gold on silver..,nriched gold ..... ......................... .... ......... 8 4 MlNERAL RESOURCES OF TASMANIA II 0 1+4 Scm PRINCIPAL AREAS OF ALLUVIAL GOLD PRODUCTION IN TASMANIA o 100 kilometres TN I 1470 Figure 1. Areas of major alluvial gold produclion in Tasmania described in the lext- 1: Mangana-Mathinna-Alberton, 2: Gladslon&-Derby, 3: Lisle, 4: Back Creek-Lefroy, 5: Beaconsfield, 6: Moina, 7: Wynyard, 8: Arthur River, 9: Corinna-Savage River, 10: Ring River-Wilson River, 11 : Lyell-Darwin, 12: Jane River, 13: Cygnet.
  • Tasmanian Geological Survey: Acid Mine Drainage

    Tasmanian Geological Survey: Acid Mine Drainage

    TasmanianTasmanian Acid Acid DrainageDrainage Reconnaissance Reconnaissance ReportReport 1 1 AcidAcid drainage drainage fromfrom abandoned abandoned minesmines in in Tasmania Tasmania MINERAL RESOURCES TASMANIA Tasmanian Geological Survey Natural Heritage Tasmania Record 2001/05 DEPARTMENT of Trust INFRASTRUCTURE, Helping Communities ENERGYand RESOURCES Helping Australia Tasmanian Geological Survey Natural Heritage Record 2001/05 Trust Tasmania Helping Communities Helping Australia Tasmanian Acid Drainage Reconnaissance 1. Acid drainage from abandoned mines in Tasmania Dr Shivaraj Gurung FOREWORD Acid drainage, resulting from the oxidation of sulphide-bearing rocks, is recognised as one of the major sources of heavy metal pollution in many of waterways proximal to metal mining sites in Tasmania. Prior to this investigation, only limited information was available on the extent of acid drainage impact from historic abandoned mine sites. Section 37.5 of the Tasmanian State Policy on Water Quality Management (1997) requires that “an inventory of sources of acid drainage from historic mine workings should be carried out”. This reconnaissance investigation provides a basis for this inventory. The program is a component of the proposed State Water Quality and Quantity programs and was largely funded by the National Heritage Trust. Water analyses were carried out by the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment at the Analytical Service Tasmania laboratory. Geochemical analyses, map production and project management were carried out by Mineral Resources Tasmania. This report primarily focuses on acid drainage from abandoned mine sites in Tasmania. It presents new data and the compilation of existing data on water chemistry and geochemistry associated with abandoned mine sites in Tasmania. The report accompanies a series of acid drainage impact maps and an inventory of acid-producing abandoned mine sites.
  • Dgvs for Aquatic Ecosystems of the King-Henty Catchment

    Dgvs for Aquatic Ecosystems of the King-Henty Catchment

    Default Guideline Values (DGVs) for Aquatic Ecosystems of the King- Henty Catchment August 2021 Publishing Information Citation: Environment Protection Authority (2021) Default Guideline Values (DGVs) for Aquatic Ecosystems of the King-Henty Catchment, Environment Protection Authority, Hobart, Tasmania. Date: August 2021 Enquiries: Environment Protection Authority GPO Box 1550 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Telephone: (03) 6165 4599 Email: [email protected] Web: www.epa.tas.gov.au Copyright: © The Crown of Tasmania Disclaimer: The information provided in this document is provided in good faith. The Crown, its officers, employees and agents do not accept liability however arising, including liability for negligence, for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon the information in this document and/or reliance on its availability at any time. ISBN-13: 978-1-74380-115-4 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Protected Environmental Values (PEVs) – Community Values ............................................................................... 4 Default Guideline Values .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Ecosystem Condition .......................................................................................................................................................
  • Lynchford Project (Pieman River Group) Tasmania El2/2005

    Lynchford Project (Pieman River Group) Tasmania El2/2005

    ABN 31 109 933 995 LYNCHFORD PROJECT (PIEMAN RIVER GROUP) TASMANIA EL2/2005 FINAL REPORT 1ST JULY 2008 – 20 TH JANUARY 2009 Tenement Holder/Manager Bass Metals Ltd. Suite 5, 2 Richardson St West Perth, WA, 6005 Geologist: Dean Williamson, B. App. Sc, Grad Dip Ed Exploration Geologist Hellyer Exploration Base, TAS Author: Sally Bates, B. App. Sc (Geol) Tenement Geologist Hellyer Exploration Base, TAS Distribution: Mineral Resources Tasmania Bass Metals Ltd Clancy Exploration Ltd Disclaimer The conclusions and recommendations expressed in this report / table represent the opinions of the Authors based upon the data available and provided to them. The opinions and recommendations provided from this information are in response to a request from the client and no liability is accepted for commercial decisions or actions resulting from them. Note: All figures and grids are according to the GDA94, Zone 55 datum. Hellyer Exploration Base (Hellyer Mine Site), Cradle Mountain Link Rd, HELLYER / WARATAH Area PO Box 1467, BURNIE TAS 7320 Telephone (03) 6439 1464 & (03) 6439 1420 – Facsimile (03) 6439 1465 www.bassmetals.com.au LYNCHFORD PROJECT (PIEMAN RIVER GROUP) TASMANIA EL2/2005 FINAL REPORT 1ST JULY 2008 – 20 TH JANUARY 2009 ABSTRACT Bass Metals Ltd (BSM) commenced management of the Lynchford exploration licence (EL2/2005) on 8 August 2005. Work conducted during this final reporting period has included: • Partial relinquishment review and application to drop 8.725km² (submitted 11/8/2008 – awaiting approval). • Review for relinquishment of remaining 29.275km² Expenditure – Reporting period $8,806.83 Total to date $67,570.95 2 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Location and Access 4 1.2 Geology Overview 6 1.2.1 Mt Read Volcanics 6 1.2.2 The Owen Group 7 1.2.3 Gordon Group 7 1.2.4 Eldon Group 7 1.3 Exploration Rationale: 7 2.