Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania Record 1997/04 Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP A Co-operatively Formulated Plan by Government Agencies, Statutory Bodies and Relevant Land Users for the Mt Read RAP SUMMARY The formulation of this plan by a co-operative committee, comprising representatives from Government Agencies, statutory bodies and relevant land users, is a ‘first’ for Tasmania. The effort by these various parties with an interest in the Mt Read area demonstrates the commitment to protect the area in the absence of any formal reserve. The Mt Read RAP is almost entirely covered by two current mining leases, ML7M/91 over the Henty gold deposit and ML28M/93 associated with the Rosebery silver-lead-zinc mine, and exploration licence EL5/96 held by Renison Limited. The RAP is within the Mt Read Strategic Prospectivity Zone, which means that if the status of the land is changed and this effectively prevents activities on the current mining tenements, then compensation may be payable. The vegetation around Lake Johnston is acknowledged as having exceptionally high conservation and scientific values, which is why a management plan for the area was written in 1992 and adopted by the lessee. There is a need to expand the scope of the previous plan so that all users of the Mt Read area are aware of the need to abide by measures to protect the vegetation. In addition, media reports have generated much interest in the ancient stands of Huon pine growing in one part of the Mt Read RAP. Studies indicate that the existing Huon pine on the site comprises one or a few individuals which may have vegetatively reproduced on the site since the last glaciation. Demands for visitor/tourist access to view this ancient organism are increasing, and damage is being caused by unauthorised visits. This report recommends that the area around Lake Johnston be made a Nature Reserve (under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970). The area could remain within the mining lease or the area could be excised from the lease with the consent of the lessee. The area which could be made a Nature Reserve is shown in Figure 1. A management plan and regulations could be made to assist with management of the Nature Reserve. Such a plan would have statutory effect; this plan does not. The area covered by the remainder of the RAP needs to remain within the existing mining leases and exploration licence. Conditions are already in place to ensure the two lessees take steps to protect the vegetation values. Additional land users should abide by the provisions of this plan, so all those needing to access the Mt Read area abide by the same vegetation protection and hygiene measures. The report recommends that all land users adopt this Interim Management Plan for the time being, and that the Interim Management Committee (i.e. signatories to this plan) continue to meet as required until a formal change of status for the proposed Lake Johnston Nature Reserve has been made. When the area around Lake Johnston is a Nature Reserve, an Advisory Committee can be established under the provisions of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970 to advise on the management of the area. Until that time the Interim Management Committee should administer the Interim Management Plan by agreement between the parties involved. Tasmanian Geological Survey Record 1997/04 1 RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That the area around Lake Johnston be made a Nature Reserve. The area can remain within Mining Lease 28M/93 or can be excised by agreement with Pasminco Mining. 2. That a management plan be written to guide the management of the Lake Johnston Nature Reserve, and that this plan contain detailed prescriptions governing visitor access. The Management Plan should: (i) contain recommendations for the development of appropriate infrastructure and regulatory controls to allow sustainable scientific research; and (ii) identify the level and type of educational and recreational visits that are commercially and environmentally sustainable. 3. That an Advisory Committee be established to advise the Minister administering the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970 on management matters affecting the Lake Johnston Nature Reserve. The Advisory Committee should comprise of representatives of all groups who have a reason to access the Mt Read area. NB: Stringent conditions already exist covering operations by the two lessees on the remainder of the RAP. No additional controls are necessary. 4. That the final determination of visitor frequency and numbers should be made by the Parks and Wildlife Service. 5. That a photographic archive of both stills and video footage be established and such material be made freely available to news crews, etc., in preference to such crews taking more (near identical) footage. This will reduce visitor impact and reduce needless duplicate visits. 6. That until a formal change in tenure (i.e. to Nature Reserve) is made, the Interim Management Plan be accepted and used by all parties needing to access the Mt Read RAP; and 7. That the Interim Management Committee continue until a formal Advisory Committee is established. 8. That no access for tourism be granted until such time as a formal Management Plan has been developed for the proposed Lake Johnston Nature Reserve. Tasmanian Geological Survey Record 1997/04 2 SIGNATORIES TO THE MT READ RAP INTERIM MANAGEMENT PLAN Mineral Resources Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service Environment Tasmania Forest Scientists Tourism Tasmania Goldfields Tasmania Limited Pasminco Mining Rosebery Pasminco Exploration Telstra Hydro-Electric Corporation Tasmanian Geological Survey Record 1997/04 3 CONTENTS Summary …………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………… 2 Signatories to the Interim Management Plan for the Mt Read RAP……………………………… 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………………… 5 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………… 6 MANAGEMENT PLAN OBJECTIVE ………………………………………………………… 6 MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ………………………………………………… 6 DESCRIPTION OF THE MT READ RAP ……………………………………………………… 7 Location ………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Climate ………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Physiography/topography ………………………………………………………………… 7 Geology ………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Soils …………………………………………………………………………………… 8 Hydrology ……………………………………………………………………………… 8 Surface hydrology …………………………………………………………………… 8 Groundwater ………………………………………………………………………… 8 Vegetation ……………………………………………………………………………… 9 Vegetation and scientific studies ……………………………………………………… 9 Vegetation surveys …………………………………………………………………… 9 Introduced flora ……………………………………………………………………… 9 Phytophthora cinnamomi …………………………………………………………… 9 Fauna …………………………………………………………………………………… 10 Terrestrial fauna …………………………………………………………………… 10 Aquatic fauna ……………………………………………………………………… 10 Invertebrates ………………………………………………………………………… 10 Introduced fauna …………………………………………………………………… 11 Archaeological, conservation and heritage aspects ………………………………………… 11 Tasmanian Aboriginal archaeology …………………………………………………… 11 Areas of historical significance………………………………………………………… 11 Fire management ………………………………………………………………………… 12 Impact of bushfires …………………………………………………………………… 12 Lease conditions ……………………………………………………………………… 12 Exploration Licence conditions………………………………………………………… 12 Reporting of fires …………………………………………………………………… 13 CURRENT LAND USE ……………………………………………………………………… 14 Legislative framework …………………………………………………………………… 14 Land use classifications…………………………………………………………………… 14 Tasmania/Commonwealth Regional Forests Agreement …………………………………… 14 Land tenure ……………………………………………………………………………… 14 Road access ……………………………………………………………………………… 14 Existing controls — mining and exploration ……………………………………………… 14 Existing rights — mining leases…………………………………………………………… 17 Access to Mining Leases ………………………………………………………………… 17 Visitor responsibilities …………………………………………………………………… 17 Permission to visit Mining Leases ………………………………………………………… 17 Visitors to the Mt Read RAP area ………………………………………………………… 17 Scientific study…………………………………………………………………………… 17 Visitor impacts …………………………………………………………………………… 18 Forestry ………………………………………………………………………………… 18 Communications ………………………………………………………………………… 18 INTERIM MANAGEMENT PLAN …………………………………………………………… 19 Management framework ………………………………………………………………… 19 Tasmanian Geological Survey Record 1997/04 4 Possible land use classification …………………………………………………………… 19 Land tenure ……………………………………………………………………………… 20 Proposed Lake Johnston Nature Reserve — constraints on visitation ……………………… 20 Possible visitation guidelines……………………………………………………………… 20 Interim management requirements ……………………………………………………… 21 Flora management …………………………………………………………………… 21 Introduced plant species ……………………………………………………………… 21 Flora management zones ……………………………………………………………… 21 Phytophthora cinnamomi …………………………………………………………… 21 Rehabilitation ……………………………………………………………………… 22 Fire management …………………………………………………………………… 22 Water management …………………………………………………………………… 22 Terrestrial and aquatic fauna management …………………………………………… 22 Introduced fauna …………………………………………………………………… 22 Waste management …………………………………………………………………… 22 Recreation …………………………………………………………………………… 23 Cultural resources …………………………………………………………………… 23 Research …………………………………………………………………………… 23 Environmental education …………………………………………………………… 23 BIBLIOGRAPHY …………………………………………………………………………… 24 APPENDIX 1: Native species observed in the Mt Read RAP …………………………………… 26 APPENDIX 2: Areal extent (ha) of vegetation communities of the Mt Read RAP ………………… 30 APPENDIX 3: Vegetation studies of the Mt Read RAP
Recommended publications
  • Murchison Highway Upgrades
    2012 (No. 26) _______________ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA _______________ PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS Murchison Highway Upgrades ______________ Presented to His Excellency the Governor pursuant to the provisions of the Public Works Committee Act 1914. ______________ MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE Legislative Council House of Assembly Mr Harriss (Chairman) Mr Booth Mr Hall Mr Brooks Ms White TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 2 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 2 PROJECT COSTS ............................................................................................................ 3 EVIDENCE ...................................................................................................................... 4 DOCUMENTS TAKEN INTO EVIDENCE ......................................................................... 9 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION .................................................................... 9 1 INTRODUCTION To His Excellency the Honourable Peter Underwood, AC, Governor in and over the State of Tasmania and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCY The Committee has investigated the following proposals: - Murchison Highway Upgrades and now has the honour to present the Report to Your Excellency in accordance with the Public Works Committee Act 1914. BACKGROUND The Murchison Highway
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Land Use Planning Strategy
    " " " " " " " " " !"#$%&'(#$%&')*&+,%,(*-%)#"%.,(**+*/%#$0($"/1%" " #".$"23"0%4567% " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Prepared for West Coast Council" " By:" ႛ Integrated Planning Solutions; ႛ Essential Economics; and ႛ Ratio Consultants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
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Hualong Pty Ltd 1 Fowler Street Zeehan Tasmania 7469 Australia; Ph: 03 6471 6613; ACN 131 800 934
    Australian Hualong Pty Ltd 1 Fowler Street Zeehan Tasmania 7469 Australia; Ph: 03 6471 6613; ACN 131 800 934 13 November 2019 The Chairperson Board of Environmental Protection Authority Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 44 Hobart, TAS 7001 Via email "Mulligan, Helen (EPA)" <[email protected]> Dear Sir/Madam: Re: Tenth Legion Iron Ore Mine; DRAFT 3 Notice Of Intent - Level 2 Extractive Industries 1 Proponent This submission is made by Australian Hualong Limited (AHL). Contact details are; Dr Joe Xie Australian Hualong Pty Ltd. Tel/Fax: 02 8197 6518 ABN 96131800934 ACN 131 800 934. Operations: 1 Fowler Street Zeehan Tasmania 7469. PO Box 231 Zeehan Tasmania 7469 Ph: 03 6471 6613 Registered Address: 41 Kambala Road, Bellevue Hill, NSW 2023 Mr. Zhian Zhang, sole owner of Australian Hualong, has extensive experience in iron ore, tin and base metal mining, processing and smelting, mostly through his operations in Yunnan, China. More details about Mr. Zhang's operation under Zhida Industry in China are provided in the document attached, if required. Zhida in China is also owned and controlled by Mr. Zhang. 2 Project name and location The project name is the Tenth Legion Iron Ore Mine. The Project is located approximately 10km west of the township of Zeehan on the west coast of Tasmania (Figure 1). Australian Hualong Magnetite Mine – Draft NOI Revised 3 2 FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION – Zeehan Western Tasmania AHL also owns the nearby Comstock plant site, which is being rehabilitated. AHL is applying for a mining lease over the propose project area, as shown in Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management in the Anthony–Pieman Hydropower Scheme
    Water management in the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme Pieman Sustainability Review June 2015 FACT SHEET Background The Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme provides a highly valued and reliable source of electricity. The total water storage of the hydropower scheme is 512 gigalitres and the average annual generation is 2367 gigawatt hours. Construction of the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme has resulted in creation of water storages (lakes) and alterations to the natural flow of existing rivers and streams. The Pieman Sustainability Review is a review of operational, social and environmental aspects of the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme that are influenced by Hydro Tasmania. This fact sheet elaborates on water management issues presented in the summary report, available at http://www.hydro.com.au/pieman-sustainability-review Water storage levels in the Anthony–Pieman Water levels have been monitored at these storages since hydropower scheme their creation in stages between 1981 and 1991. The Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme includes eight Headwater storages: Lake Mackintosh and Lake water storages, classified as headwater storages (Lakes Murchison Mackintosh and Murchison), diversion storages (Lakes Lakes Mackintosh and Murchison are the main headwater Henty and Newton and White Spur Pond) and run-of-river storages for the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme. storages (Lakes Rosebery, Plimsoll and Pieman). Lakes The water level fluctuates over the entire operating range Murchison, Henty and Newton and White Spur Pond do not from Normal Minimum Operating Level (NMOL) to Full release water directly to a power station; rather they are Supply Level (FSL) (Figures 1, 2). used to transfer water to other storages within the scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and Related Scrub
    Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and related scrub Eucryphia lucida Vegetation Condition Benchmarks version 1 Rainforest and Related Scrub RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: Sphagnum peatland facies Community Description: Athrotaxis cupressoides (5–8 m) forms small woodland patches or appears as copses and scattered small trees. On the Central Plateau (and other dolerite areas such as Mount Field), broad poorly– drained valleys and small glacial depressions may contain scattered A. cupressoides trees and copses over Sphagnum cristatum bogs. In the treeless gaps, Sphagnum cristatum is usually overgrown by a combination of any of Richea scoparia, R. gunnii, Baloskion australe, Epacris gunnii and Gleichenia alpina. This is one of three benchmarks available for assessing the condition of RPW. This is the appropriate benchmark to use in assessing the condition of the Sphagnum facies of the listed Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland community (Schedule 3A, Nature Conservation Act 2002). Benchmarks: Length Component Cover % Height (m) DBH (cm) #/ha (m)/0.1 ha Canopy 10% - - - Large Trees - 6 20 5 Organic Litter 10% - Logs ≥ 10 - 2 Large Logs ≥ 10 Recruitment Continuous Understorey Life Forms LF code # Spp Cover % Immature tree IT 1 1 Medium shrub/small shrub S 3 30 Medium sedge/rush/sagg/lily MSR 2 10 Ground fern GF 1 1 Mosses and Lichens ML 1 70 Total 5 8 Last reviewed – 2 November 2016 Tasmanian Vegetation Monitoring and Mapping Program Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment http://www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au/tasveg RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: Sphagnum facies Species lists: Canopy Tree Species Common Name Notes Athrotaxis cupressoides pencil pine Present as a sparse canopy Typical Understorey Species * Common Name LF Code Epacris gunnii coral heath S Richea scoparia scoparia S Richea gunnii bog candleheath S Astelia alpina pineapple grass MSR Baloskion australe southern cordrush MSR Gleichenia alpina dwarf coralfern GF Sphagnum cristatum sphagnum ML *This list is provided as a guide only.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition 2 from Forest to Fjaeldmark the Vegetation Communities Highland Treeless Vegetation
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Highland treeless vegetation Richea scoparia Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Highland treeless vegetation Community (Code) Page Alpine coniferous heathland (HCH) 4 Cushion moorland (HCM) 6 Eastern alpine heathland (HHE) 8 Eastern alpine sedgeland (HSE) 10 Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) 12 Western alpine heathland (HHW) 13 Western alpine sedgeland/herbland (HSW) 15 General description Rainforest and related scrub, Dry eucalypt forest and woodland, Scrub, heathland and coastal complexes. Highland treeless vegetation communities occur Likewise, some non-forest communities with wide within the alpine zone where the growth of trees is environmental amplitudes, such as wetlands, may be impeded by climatic factors. The altitude above found in alpine areas. which trees cannot survive varies between approximately 700 m in the south-west to over The boundaries between alpine vegetation communities are usually well defined, but 1 400 m in the north-east highlands; its exact location depends on a number of factors. In many communities may occur in a tight mosaic. In these parts of Tasmania the boundary is not well defined. situations, mapping community boundaries at Sometimes tree lines are inverted due to exposure 1:25 000 may not be feasible. This is particularly the or frost hollows. problem in the eastern highlands; the class Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) is used in There are seven specific highland heathland, those areas where remote sensing does not provide sedgeland and moorland mapping communities, sufficient resolution. including one undifferentiated class. Other highland treeless vegetation such as grasslands, herbfields, A minor revision in 2017 added information on the grassy sedgelands and wetlands are described in occurrence of peatland pool complexes, and other sections.
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Council, Zeehan Landfill Wetlands, Extension
    Environmental Assessment Report Zeehan Landfill Wetland Zeehan Waste Depot, Zeehan West Coast Council July 2021 Environmental Assessment Report – West Coast Council – Zeehan Landfill Wetland, Zeehan Waste Depot, Zeehan 1 Environmental Assessment Report Proponent West Coast Council Proposal Zeehan Landfill Wetland Location Zeehan Waste Depot, 3990 Henty Road, Zeehan Tasmania 7467 NELMS no. PCE 10460 Permit Application No. 2021/13 West Coast Council Electronic Folder No. EN-EM-EV-DE 261742-001 Document No. D21-26020 Class of Assessment 2A Assessment Process Milestones 25 May 2020 Notice of Intent lodged 01 July 2020 Guidelines Issued 02 March 2021 Permit Application submitted to Council 03 March 2021 Application received by the Board 13 March 2021 Start of public consultation period 27 March 2021 End of public consultation period 6 May 2021 Date draft conditions issued to proponent 7 May 2021 Statutory period for assessment ends, extension agreed until 21 May 2021 21 May 2021 Proponent submits amended layout to EPA with amended activity area and prepares to submit Permit Application. 12 June 2021 Start of public consultation period 26 June 2021 End of public consultation period 6 May 2021 Conditions forwarded to proponent for comment Environmental Assessment Report – West Coast Council – Zeehan Landfill Wetland, Zeehan Waste Depot, Zeehan 2 Acronyms 7Q10 Lowest 7 day average flow in a 10 year period AMD Acid and Metalliferous Drainage AMDMP Acid and Metalliferous Drainage Management Plan AMT Accepted Modern Technology ANZECC Guidelines Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality 2000 (co published by the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council).
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwaters in Wet, Temperate, Mountainous,Sulphide-Mining Districts
    Groundwaters in wet, temperate, mountainous, sulphide-mining districts: delineation of modern fluid flow and predictive modelling for mine closure (Rosebery, Tasmania). by Lee R. Evans B.App.Sci.(Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA September 2009 Cover Image: Elevated orthogonal view of the 3D Rosebery groundwater model grid looking towards the northeast. i Declaration This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the candidate’s knowledge and beliefs, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis. Three co-authored conference publications written as part of the present study (Evans et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2004a; and Evans et al., 2004b) are provided in Appendix Sixteen. Lee R. Evans Date: This thesis is to be made available for loan or copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1969 from the date this statement was signed. Lee R. Evans Date: ii Abstract There are as yet few studies of the hydrogeology of sulphide-mining districts in wet, temperate, mountainous areas of the world. This is despite the importance of understanding the influence of hydrogeology on the evolution and management of environmental issues such as acid mine drainage (AMD). There is a need to determine whether the special climatic and geological features of such districts result in distinct groundwater behaviours and compositions which need to be considered in mining impact studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Waterways Report
    Annual Waterways Report Pieman Catchment Water Assessment Branch 2009 ISSN: 1835-8489 Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries and Water, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIW has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries and Water, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Department of Primary Industries and Water Pieman Catchment Contents 1. About the catchment 2. Streamflow and Water Allocation 3. River Health 1. About the catchment The Pieman catchment drains a land mass of more than 4,100 km 2 stretching from about Lake St Clair in the Central Highlands west more than 90 km to Granville Harbour on the rugged West Coast of Tasmania. Major rivers draining the catchment are the Savage, Donaldson and Whyte rivers in the lower catchment, the Pieman, Huskisson rivers in the middle catchment and the Mackintosh, Murchison and Anthony rivers in the upper catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Henty Gold Limited A.C.N
    Henty Gold Mine Howards Road HENTY TAS 7467 PO Box 231 QUEENSTOWN TAS 7467 Australia Telephone: + 61 3 6473 2444 Facsimile: + 61 3 6473 1857 HENTY GOLD LIMITED A.C.N. 008 764 412 Final Report 2003 EL 13/2001 Langdon HELD BY: AURIONGOLD EXPLORATION PTY LTD MANAGER & OPERATOR: AURIONGOLD EXPLORATION PTY LTD AUTHOR(s): Michael Vicary 24 March 2003 PROSPECTS: MAP SHEETS: 1:250,000: 1:100,000: GEOGRAPHIC COORDS Min East: Max East: Min North: Max North: COMMODITY(s): Au, Cu, Pb, Zn KEY WORDS: Distribution: o AurionGold Exploration Information Centre Reference: o AurionGold Exploration - Zeehan o Mineral Resources Tasmania Langdon EL 13/2001 Relinquishment Report 2003 SUMMARY This report documents the work completed on EL 13/2001 – Langdon by AurionGold Exploration. In late 2002, AurionGold Exploration was acquired by Placer Dome Asia Pacific and a detailed review of Tasmanian exploration program completed. As a result of the review all non-mine lease exploration was suspended and several exploration tenements (including the Langdon EL) were recommended to be relinquished. i Langdon EL 13/2001 Relinquishment Report 2003 Table of Contents SUMMARY i 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Location and Access 1 1.2 Topography and Vegetation 1 1.3 Tenure 1 1.4 Aims 3 1.5 Exploration Model 3 2 PREVIOUS EXPLORATION 6 3WORK COMPLETED 7 4 REHABILITATION 8 5 DISCUSSION and RECOMMENDATIONS 8 6. REFERENCES 9 List of Figures 1 Langdon EL Location Map 2 Henty Model 3 Regional Geology 4 Chargeability Image ii Langdon EL 13/2001 Relinquishment Report 2003 1 INTRODUCTION EL 13/2001 - Langdon is held and explored by AurionGold Exploration Pty Ltd (formerly Goldfields Exploration Pty Ltd).
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro 4 Water Storage
    TERM OF REFERENCE 3: STATE-WIDE WATER STORAGE MANAGEMENT The causes of the floods which were active in Tasmania over the period 4-7 June 2016 including cloud-seeding, State-wide water storage management and debris management. 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Cause of the Floods (a) It is clear that the flooding that affected northern Tasmania (including the Mersey, Forth, Ouse and South Esk rivers) during the relevant period was directly caused by “a persistent and very moist north-easterly airstream” which resulted in “daily [rainfall] totals [that were] unprecedented for any month across several locations in the northern half of Tasmania”, in some cases in excess of 200mm.1 (b) This paper addresses Hydro Tasmania’s water storage management prior to and during the floods. 1.2 Overview (a) In 2014, Tasmania celebrated 100 years of hydro industrialisation and the role it played in the development of Tasmania. Hydro Tasmania believes that understanding the design and purpose of the hydropower infrastructure that was developed to bring electricity and investment to the state is an important starting point to provide context for our submission. The Tasmanian hydropower system design and operation is highly complex and is generally not well understood in the community. We understand that key stakeholder groups are seeking to better understand the role that hydropower operations may have in controlling or contributing to flood events in Tasmania. (b) The hydropower infrastructure in Tasmania was designed and installed for the primary purpose of generating hydro-electricity. Flood mitigation was not a primary objective in the design of Hydro Tasmania’s dams when the schemes were developed, and any flood mitigation benefit is a by-product of their hydro- generation operation.
    [Show full text]
  • EPBC Act Referral
    EPBC Act referral Note: PDF may contain fields not relevant to your application. These fields will appear blank or unticked. Please disregard these fields. Title of proposal 2021/8909 - South Marionoak Tailings Storage Facility, Rosebery, Tasmania Section 1 Summary of your proposed action 1.1 Project industry type Mining 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities The proposed action is the construction and operation of a new Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) at South Marionoak (SMO) in proximity to Rosebery, Tasmania within the West Coast municipality (South Marionoak TSF). The South Marionoak TSF will form part of the MMG Rosebery mine operations and will allow for piping and disposal of tailings resulting from the processing plant. The proposed South Marionoak TSF will provide long term essential tailings storage for the Rosebery Mine. Rosebery Mine has operated continuously since 1936 as an underground polymetallic base metal mine with a capacity to produce up to 1,100,000 tonnes of ore per year. Rosebery produces zinc, copper and lead concentrates, as well as gold ore. The mine has used the Bobadil TSF, situated approximately 2.5 km north of the mine, and 2/5 Dam TSF situated approximately 1 km south of the mine. The TSFs are expected to reach capacity within the next few years, and a new TSF will be required to support the mine’s ongoing operation. The South Marionoak TSF has been designed as an off-stream facility with storage volume of approximately 25 Mm3 and an anticipated lifespan of around 42 years (based on current tailings production rates).
    [Show full text]