DOCSLIB.ORG

Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and Related Scrub

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and Related Scrub Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and related scrub Eucryphia lucida Vegetation Condition Benchmarks version 1 Rainforest and Related Scrub RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: Sphagnum peatland facies Community Description: Athrotaxis cupressoides (5–8 m) forms small woodland patches or appears as copses and scattered small trees. On the Central Plateau (and other dolerite areas such as Mount Field), broad poorly– drained valleys and small glacial depressions may contain scattered A. cupressoides trees and copses over Sphagnum cristatum bogs. In the treeless gaps, Sphagnum cristatum is usually overgrown by a combination of any of Richea scoparia, R. gunnii, Baloskion australe, Epacris gunnii and Gleichenia alpina. This is one of three benchmarks available for assessing the condition of RPW. This is the appropriate benchmark to use in assessing the condition of the Sphagnum facies of the listed Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland community (Schedule 3A, Nature Conservation Act 2002). Benchmarks: Length Component Cover % Height (m) DBH (cm) #/ha (m)/0.1 ha Canopy 10% - - - Large Trees - 6 20 5 Organic Litter 10% - Logs ≥ 10 - 2 Large Logs ≥ 10 Recruitment Continuous Understorey Life Forms LF code # Spp Cover % Immature tree IT 1 1 Medium shrub/small shrub S 3 30 Medium sedge/rush/sagg/lily MSR 2 10 Ground fern GF 1 1 Mosses and Lichens ML 1 70 Total 5 8 Last reviewed – 2 November 2016 Tasmanian Vegetation Monitoring and Mapping Program Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment http://www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au/tasveg RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: Sphagnum facies Species lists: Canopy Tree Species Common Name Notes Athrotaxis cupressoides pencil pine Present as a sparse canopy Typical Understorey Species * Common Name LF Code Epacris gunnii coral heath S Richea scoparia scoparia S Richea gunnii bog candleheath S Astelia alpina pineapple grass MSR Baloskion australe southern cordrush MSR Gleichenia alpina dwarf coralfern GF Sphagnum cristatum sphagnum ML *This list is provided as a guide only. The species listed are typical of this plant community type but may not necessarily be present. Vegetation Condition Benchmarks version 1 Rainforest and Related Scrub RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: coniferous heathland facies Community Description: Athrotaxis cupressoides (5–8 m) forms small woodland patches or appears as copses and scattered small trees. In the west A. cupressoides is scattered over a diverse understorey of coniferous heath, with Microcachrys tetragona and sometimes Pherosphaera hookeriana, and sparse Nothofagus gunnii present. This is one of three benchmarks available for assessing the condition of RPW. This is the appropriate benchmark to use in assessing the condition of the coniferous heathland facies of the listed Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland community (Schedule 3A, Nature Conservation Act 2002). Benchmarks: Length Component Cover % Height (m) DBH (cm) #/ha (m)/0.1 ha Canopy 10% - - - Large Trees - 6 20 5 Organic Litter 10% - Logs ≥ 10 - 2 Large Logs ≥ 10 Recruitment Continuous Understorey Life Forms LF code # Spp Cover % Immature tree IT 1 5 Medium shrub/small shrub S 12 20 Prostrate shrub PS 2 20 Herbs and orchids H 4 5 Grasses G 1 5 Medium sedge/rush/sagg/lily MSR 2 10 Ground fern GF 1 5 Mosses and Lichens ML 1 5 Total 8 24 Last reviewed – 2 November 2016 Tasmanian Vegetation Monitoring and Mapping Program Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment http://www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au/tasveg RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: coniferous heath facies Species lists: Canopy Tree Species Common Name Notes Athrotaxis cupressoides pencil pine Present as a sparse canopy Emergent Tree Species Common Name Notes Eucalyptus coccifera tasmanian snow gum Scattered trees only, when present Eucalyptus gunnii cider gum Scattered trees only, when present Eucalyptus subcrenulata alpine yellow gum Scattered trees only, when present Eucalyptus subcrenulata alpine yellow gum Scattered trees only, when present Typical Understorey Species * Common Name LF Code Nothofagus gunnii deciduous beech T Coprosma nitida mountain currant S Diselma archeri dwarf pine S Grevillea australis var. montana alpine grevillia S Microcachrys tetragona creeping pine S Microstrobos niphophilus mount mawson pine S Nothofagus gunnii deciduous beech S Orites revolutus revolute orites S Orites acicularis yellow bush S Planocarpa petiolaris alpine cheeseberry S Richea scoparia scoparia S Richea sprengelioides rigid candleheath S Tasmannia lanceolata mountain pepper S Abrotanella forsteroides tasmanian cushionplant PS Donatia novae-zelandiae snow cushionplan PS Dracophyllum minimum heath cushionplant PS Leptospermum rupestre mountain teatree PS Pentachondra pumila carpet frillyheath PS Podocarpus lawrencei mountain plum pine PS Bellendena montana mountain rocket H Boronia rhomboidea broadleaf boronia H Euphrasia striata shiny striped eyebright H Poa gunnii gunns snowgrass G Empodisma minus spreading roperush MRS Eurychorda complanata flat cord-rush MSR Gleichenia alpina alpine coralfern GF *This list is provided as a guide only. The species listed are typical of this plant community type but may not necessarily be present. Vegetation Condition Benchmarks version 1 Rainforest and Related Scrub RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: blockfield and riparian facies Community Description: Athrotaxis cupressoides (5–8 m) forms small open woodland patches or appears as copses or scattered small trees. The canopy does not exceed 20%. This is the major expression of RPW, and most commonly occurs on the eastern half and northern edge of the Central Plateau. A. cupressoides occurs as a sparse canopy of trees or as copses on blockfields and along creek lines and lakeshores often with Podocarpus lawrencei and occasionally Diselma archeri and a diverse shrubby understorey. This is one of three benchmarks available for assessing the condition of RPW, and is the appropriate benchmark to use in assessing the condition of the blockfield and riparian facies of the listed Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland community (Schedule 3A, Nature Conservation Act 2002). Benchmarks: Length Component Cover % Height (m) DBH (cm) #/ha (m)/0.1 ha Canopy 10% - - - Large Trees - 6 20 5 Organic Litter 10% - Logs ≥ 10 - 10 Large Logs ≥ 10 Recruitment Continuous Understorey Life Forms LF code # Spp Cover % Immature tree IT 1 1 Tree (sub-canopy) or large shrub T 1 5 Medium shrub/small shrub S 10 40 Prostrate shrub PS 1 10 Herbs and orchids H 2 5 Medium sedge/rush/sagg/lily MSR 1 5 Mosses and Lichens ML 1 5 Total 7 17 Last reviewed – 2 November 2016 Tasmanian Vegetation Monitoring and Mapping Program Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment http://www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au/tasveg RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: blockfield and riparian facies Species lists: Canopy Tree Species Common Name Notes Athrotaxis cupressoides pencil pine A. cupressoides present as a sparse canopy Emergent Tree Species Common Name Notes Eucalyptus coccifera tasmanian snow gum Scattered trees only, when present Typical Understorey Species * Common Name LF Code Eucalyptus coccifera tasmanian snow gum T Eucalyptus subcrenulata alpine yellow gum T Coprosma nitida mountain currant S Grevillea australis southern grevillea S Leptospermum rupestre mountain teatree S Olearia pinifolia prickly daisybush S Orites revolutus revolute orites S Diselma archeri dwarf pine S Orites acicularis yellow bush S Planocarpa petiolaris alpine cheeseberry S Tasmannia lanceolata mountain pepper S Podocarpus lawrencei mountain plum pine PS Bellendena montana mountain rocket H Richea sprengelioides rigid candleheath H Lepidosperma filiforme common rapiersedge MSR *This list is provided as a guide only. The species listed are typical of this plant community type but may not necessarily be present. Vegetation Condition Benchmarks version 1 Rainforest and Related Scrub RPP Athrotaxis cupressoides rainforest: Sphagnum peatland facies Community Description: Athrotaxis cupressoides rainforest (RPP) is open or closed montane forest vegetation dominated by Athrotaxis cupressoides, where Nothofagus gunnii is absent or sparse. The Sphagnum peatland variant generally occurs as an open forest over Sphagnum. The understorey may include shrubs such as Richea species and the sedge Empodisma minus. This is one of three benchmarks available to assess the condition of RPP. It is the appropriate benchmark to use in assessing the condition of the Sphagnum peatland facies of the listed Athrotaxis cupressoides rainforest community (Schedule 3A, Nature Conservation Act 2002. Benchmarks: Length Component Cover % Height (m) DBH (cm) #/ha (m)/0.1 ha Canopy 40% - - - Large Trees - 12 60 200 Organic Litter 40% - Logs ≥ 10 - 20 Large Logs ≥ 30 Recruitment Continuous Understorey Life Forms LF code # Spp Cover % Immature tree IT 1 5 Tree (sub-canopy) or large shrub T 2 5 Medium shrub/small shrub S 2 5 Herbs and orchids H 2 5 Large sedge/rush/sagg/lily LSR 2 1 Medium sedge/rush/sagg/lily MSR 1 5 Ground fern GF 1 5 Mosses and Lichens ML 1 70 Total 8 12 Last reviewed – 2 November 2016 Tasmanian Vegetation Monitoring and Mapping Program Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment http://www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au/tasveg RPP Athrotaxis cupressoides rainforest: Sphagnum peatland facies Species lists: Canopy Tree Species Common Name Notes Athrotaxis cupressoides pencil pine Eucalyptus coccifera snow gum Sub-dominant Phyllocladus aspleniifolius celery top pine Sub-dominant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toward a Resolution of Campanulid Phylogeny, with Special Reference to the Placement of Dipsacales
    TAXON 57 (1) • February 2008: 53–65 Winkworth & al. • Campanulid phylogeny MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS Toward a resolution of Campanulid phylogeny, with special reference to the placement of Dipsacales Richard C. Winkworth1,2, Johannes Lundberg3 & Michael J. Donoghue4 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461–CEP 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected] (author for correspondence) 2 Current address: School of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Private Bag, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji 3 Department of Phanerogamic Botany, The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106, U.S.A. Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG II, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diver- sity of the four largest lineages (Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, Dipsacales) as well as the smaller “unplaced” groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (atpB, matK, ndhF, rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (rps16 intron, trnT-F region, trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast dataset (all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these datasets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Tier Reserve Background Report 2016File
    Background Report Blue Tier Reserve www.tasland.org.au Tasmanian Land Conservancy (2016). The Blue Tier Reserve Background Report. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, Tasmania Australia. Copyright ©Tasmanian Land Conservancy The views expressed in this report are those of the Tasmanian Land Conservancy and not the Federal Government, State Government or any other entity. This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to an acknowledgment of the sources and no commercial usage or sale. Requests and enquires concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Tasmanian Land Conservancy. Front Image: Myrtle rainforest on Blue Tier Reserve - Andy Townsend Contact Address Tasmanian Land Conservancy PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, 827 Sandy Bay Road, Sandy Bay TAS 7005 | p: 03 6225 1399 | www.tasland.org.au Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Location and Access ................................................................................................................................ 4 Bioregional Values and Reserve Status ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Listing Advice on Alpine Sphagnum Bogs And
    Advice to the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) on Amendments to the List of Ecological Communities under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) 1. Summary of conservation assessment by the Committee This advice follows the assessment of information provided by a nomination to list the Alpine Bog Community as a threatened ecological community. The nomination was made available for public exhibition and comment for a period of two months. The Committee had regard to all public and expert comments that were relevant to the survival of the ecological community. The Committee judges that the ecological community has been demonstrated to have met sufficient elements of: • Criterion 2 to make it eligible for listing as endangered; • Criterion 3 to make it eligible for listing as endangered; and • Criterion 4 to make it eligible for listing as endangered. 2. Name of the ecological community A nomination was received for the Alpine Bog Community. Alpine bogs are commonly found in the vicinity of alpine fens, and have been identified as being dependent on these (VSAC, 1991a). In order to make identification easier in the field, to recognise the importance of Sphagnum species to alpine bogs, and to acknowledge the interdependency of alpine bogs, fens and the natural drainage lines that connect them, the Committee recommends that the name of the ecological community be changed to the “Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens” ecological community. 3. Description The Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens ecological community generally has sharp boundaries and is easily delineated from other alpine vegetation communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    African countries and neighbouring islands covered by the Synopsis. S T R E L I T Z I A 23 Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands by J.P. Roux Pretoria 2009 S T R E L I T Z I A This series has replaced Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa and Annals of the Kirstenbosch Botanic Gardens which SANBI inherited from its predecessor organisations. The plant genus Strelitzia occurs naturally in the eastern parts of southern Africa. It comprises three arborescent species, known as wild bananas, and two acaulescent species, known as crane flowers or bird-of-paradise flowers. The logo of the South African National Biodiversity Institute is based on the striking inflorescence of Strelitzia reginae, a native of the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal that has become a garden favourite worldwide. It sym- bolises the commitment of the Institute to champion the exploration, conservation, sustain- able use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. J.P. Roux South African National Biodiversity Institute, Compton Herbarium, Cape Town SCIENTIFIC EDITOR: Gerrit Germishuizen TECHNICAL EDITOR: Emsie du Plessis DESIGN & LAYOUT: Elizma Fouché COVER DESIGN: Elizma Fouché, incorporating Blechnum palmiforme on Gough Island PHOTOGRAPHS J.P. Roux Citing this publication ROUX, J.P. 2009. Synopsis of the Lycopodiophyta and Pteridophyta of Africa, Madagascar and neighbouring islands. Strelitzia 23. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN: 978-1-919976-48-8 © Published by: South African National Biodiversity Institute. Obtainable from: SANBI Bookshop, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition 2 from Forest to Fjaeldmark the Vegetation Communities Highland Treeless Vegetation
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Highland treeless vegetation Richea scoparia Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Highland treeless vegetation Community (Code) Page Alpine coniferous heathland (HCH) 4 Cushion moorland (HCM) 6 Eastern alpine heathland (HHE) 8 Eastern alpine sedgeland (HSE) 10 Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) 12 Western alpine heathland (HHW) 13 Western alpine sedgeland/herbland (HSW) 15 General description Rainforest and related scrub, Dry eucalypt forest and woodland, Scrub, heathland and coastal complexes. Highland treeless vegetation communities occur Likewise, some non-forest communities with wide within the alpine zone where the growth of trees is environmental amplitudes, such as wetlands, may be impeded by climatic factors. The altitude above found in alpine areas. which trees cannot survive varies between approximately 700 m in the south-west to over The boundaries between alpine vegetation communities are usually well defined, but 1 400 m in the north-east highlands; its exact location depends on a number of factors. In many communities may occur in a tight mosaic. In these parts of Tasmania the boundary is not well defined. situations, mapping community boundaries at Sometimes tree lines are inverted due to exposure 1:25 000 may not be feasible. This is particularly the or frost hollows. problem in the eastern highlands; the class Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) is used in There are seven specific highland heathland, those areas where remote sensing does not provide sedgeland and moorland mapping communities, sufficient resolution. including one undifferentiated class. Other highland treeless vegetation such as grasslands, herbfields, A minor revision in 2017 added information on the grassy sedgelands and wetlands are described in occurrence of peatland pool complexes, and other sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Lssn 0811-5311 DATE - SEPTEMBER 19 87
    lSSN 0811-5311 DATE - SEPTEMBER 19 87 "REGISTERD BY AUSTRALIA POST -, FTlBL IC AT ION LEADER : Peter Hind, 41 Miller stredt, Mt. Druitt 2770 SECRETARY : Moreen Woollett, 3 Curriwang Place, Como West 2226 HON. TREASURER: Margaret Olde, 138 Fmler ~oad,Illaong 2234 SPORE BANK: Jenny Thompson, 2a Albion blace, Engadine 2233 Dear Wers, I First the good ws. I ?hanks to the myme&- who pdded articles, umrmts and slides, the book uhichwe are produehg thraqh the Pblisw Secticm of S.G.A.P. (NSFi) wted is nearing c~np3etion. mjblicatio~lshkmger, Bill Payne has proof copies and is currm'tly lt-dhg firral co-m. !€his uill be *e initial. volume in ghat is expeckd to be a -1ete reference to &~~txalirrnferns and is titled "The Australian Fern Series 1". It is only a smll volm~hi&hcrpefully can be retailed at an afford& le price -b the majority of fern grcw ers. Our prl3 Emtion differs -Em maq rrgard&gr' b mks b-use it is not full of irrelevant padding, me -is has been on pm3uci.q a practical guide to tihe cultivation of particular Aus&dlian native ferns, There is me article of a technical nature based rm recent research, but al-h scientific this tm has been x ritten in simple tmm that would be appreciated by most fern grm ers, A feature of the beis the 1- nuher of striking full =lour Uus.hratims. In our next Wsletterge hope to say more &opt details of phlicatim EOODIA SP . NO. 1 - CANIF On the last page of this Newsletter there is d photo copy of another unsual and apparently attractive fern contributed by Queensland member Rod Pattison.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids
    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Methods Results
    Papers and Proceedings Royal Society ofTasmania, Volume 1999 103 THE CHARACTERISTICS AND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS OF THE VEGETATION AND FLORA OF THE HUNTINGFIELD AREA, SOUTHERN TASMANIA by J.B. Kirkpatrick (with two tables, four text-figures and one appendix) KIRKPATRICK, J.B., 1999 (31:x): The characteristics and management problems of the vegetation and flora of the Huntingfield area, southern Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 133(1): 103-113. ISSN 0080-4703. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University ofTasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. The Huntingfield area has a varied vegetation, including substantial areas ofEucalyptus amygdalina heathy woodland, heath, buttongrass moorland and E. amygdalina shrubbyforest, with smaller areas ofwetland, grassland and E. ovata shrubbyforest. Six floristic communities are described for the area. Two hundred and one native vascular plant taxa, 26 moss species and ten liverworts are known from the area, which is particularly rich in orchids, two ofwhich are rare in Tasmania. Four other plant species are known to be rare and/or unreserved inTasmania. Sixty-four exotic plantspecies have been observed in the area, most ofwhich do not threaten the native biodiversity. However, a group offire-adapted shrubs are potentially serious invaders. Management problems in the area include the maintenance ofopen areas, weed invasion, pathogen invasion, introduced animals, fire, mechanised recreation, drainage from houses and roads, rubbish dumping and the gathering offirewood, sand and plants. Key Words: flora, forest, heath, Huntingfield, management, Tasmania, vegetation, wetland, woodland. INTRODUCTION species with the most cover in the shrub stratum (dominant species) was noted. If another species had more than half The Huntingfield Estate, approximately 400 ha of forest, the cover ofthe dominant one it was noted as a codominant.
    [Show full text]
  • Kosipe Revisited
    Peat in the mountains of New Guinea G.S. Hope Department of Archaeology and Natural History, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia _______________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY Peatlands are common in montane areas above 1,000 m in New Guinea and become extensive above 3,000 m in the subalpine zone. In the montane mires, swamp forests and grass or sedge fens predominate on swampy valley bottoms. These mires may be 4–8 m in depth and up to 30,000 years in age. In Papua New Guinea (PNG) there is about 2,250 km2 of montane peatland, and Papua Province (the Indonesian western half of the island) probably contains much more. Above 3,000 m, peat soils form under blanket bog on slopes as well as on valley floors. Vegetation types include cushion bog, grass bog and sedge fen. Typical peat depths are 0.5‒1 m on slopes, but valley floors and hollows contain up to 10 m of peat. The estimated total extent of mountain peatland is 14,800 km2 with 5,965 km2 in PNG and about 8,800 km2 in Papua Province. The stratigraphy, age structure and vegetation histories of 45 peatland or organic limnic sites above 750 m have been investigated since 1965. These record major vegetation shifts at 28,000, 17,000‒14,000 and 9,000 years ago and a variable history of human disturbance from 14,000 years ago with extensive clearance by the mid- Holocene at some sites. While montane peatlands were important agricultural centres in the Holocene, the introduction of new dryland crops has resulted in the abandonment of some peatlands in the last few centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens
    Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens A nationally threatened ecological community Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Policy Statement 3.16 This brochure is designed to assist land managers, owners and occupiers to identify, assess and manage the Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens, an ecological community listed under Australia’s national environment law, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The brochure is a companion document to the listing advice which can be found at the Australian Government’s Species Profile and Threats Database (SPRAT). Please go to the Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens ecological community profile in SPRAT, then click on the ‘Details’ link: www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publiclookupcommunities.pl • The Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens ecological community is found in small pockets in the high country of Tasmania, Victoria, New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. • The Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens ecological community can usually be defined by the presence or absence of sphagnum moss. • Long term conservation and restoration of this ecological community is essential in order to protect vital inland water resources. • Implementing favourable land use and management practices is encouraged at sites containing this ecological community. Disclaimer The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials. This document is valid as at August 2009. The Commonwealth Government is not liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 This work is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytotoxic C20 Diterpenoid Alkaloids from the Australian Endemic Rainforest Plant Anopterus Macleayanus Claire Levrier,†,‡ Martin C
    This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. Article pubs.acs.org/jnp Cytotoxic C20 Diterpenoid Alkaloids from the Australian Endemic Rainforest Plant Anopterus macleayanus Claire Levrier,†,‡ Martin C. Sadowski,‡ Colleen C. Nelson,‡ and Rohan A. Davis*,† † Eskitis Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia ‡ Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre−Queensland, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: In order to identify new anticancer compounds from nature, a prefractionated library derived from Australian endemic plants was generated and screened against the prostate cancer cell line LNCaP using a metabolic assay. Fractions from the seeds, leaves, and wood of Anopterus macleayanus showed cytotoxic activity and were subsequently investigated using a combination of bioassay-guided fractionation and mass-directed isolation. This led to the identification of four new diterpenoid alkaloids, 6α-acetoxyanopterine (1), 4′-hydroxy-6α-acetoxya- nopterine (2), 4′-hydroxyanopterine (3), and 11α-benzoyla- nopterine (4), along with four known compounds, anopterine (5), 7β-hydroxyanopterine (6), 7β,4′-dihydroxyanopterine (7), and 7β-hydroxy-11α-benzoylanopterine (8); all compounds were purified as their trifluoroacetate salt. The chemical structures of 1−8 were elucidated after analysis of 1D/2D NMR and MS data. Compounds 1−8 were evaluated for cytotoxic activity against a panel of human prostate cancer cells (LNCaP, C4-2B, and DuCaP) and nonmalignant cell lines (BPH-1 and WPMY-1), using a live-cell imaging system and a metabolic assay.
    [Show full text]
  • Focusing on the Landscape Biodiversity in Australia’S National Reserve System Contents
    Focusing on the Landscape Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System Contents Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System — At a glance 1 Australia’s National Reserve System 2 The Importance of Species Information 3 Our State of Knowledge 4 Method 5 Results 6 Future Work — Survey and Reservation 8 Conclusion 10 Summary of Data 11 Appendix Species with adequate data and well represented in the National Reserve System Flora 14 Fauna 44 Species with adequate data and under-represented in the National Reserve System Flora 52 Fauna 67 Species with inadequate data Flora 73 Fauna 114 Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System At a glance • Australia’s National Reserve System (NRS) consists of over 9,000 protected areas, covering 89.5 million hectares (over 11 per cent of Australia’s land mass). • Australia is home to 7.8 per cent of the world’s plant and animal species, with an estimated 566,398 species occurring here.1 Only 147,579 of Australia’s species have been formally described. • This report assesses the state of knowledge of biodiversity in the National Reserve System based on 20,146 terrestrial fauna and flora species, comprising 54 per cent of the known terrestrial biodiversity of Australia. • Of these species, 33 per cent (6,652 species) have inadequate data to assess their reservation status. • Of species with adequate data: • 23 per cent (3,123 species) are well represented in the NRS • 65 per cent (8,692 species) are adequately represented in the NRS • 12 per cent (1,648 species) are under- represented in the NRS 1 Chapman, A.D.
    [Show full text]