Groundwaters in Wet, Temperate, Mountainous,Sulphide-Mining Districts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Groundwaters in Wet, Temperate, Mountainous,Sulphide-Mining Districts Groundwaters in wet, temperate, mountainous, sulphide-mining districts: delineation of modern fluid flow and predictive modelling for mine closure (Rosebery, Tasmania). by Lee R. Evans B.App.Sci.(Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA September 2009 Cover Image: Elevated orthogonal view of the 3D Rosebery groundwater model grid looking towards the northeast. i Declaration This thesis contains no material that has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the candidate’s knowledge and beliefs, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis. Three co-authored conference publications written as part of the present study (Evans et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2004a; and Evans et al., 2004b) are provided in Appendix Sixteen. Lee R. Evans Date: This thesis is to be made available for loan or copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1969 from the date this statement was signed. Lee R. Evans Date: ii Abstract There are as yet few studies of the hydrogeology of sulphide-mining districts in wet, temperate, mountainous areas of the world. This is despite the importance of understanding the influence of hydrogeology on the evolution and management of environmental issues such as acid mine drainage (AMD). There is a need to determine whether the special climatic and geological features of such districts result in distinct groundwater behaviours and compositions which need to be considered in mining impact studies. The present study addresses this information gap by broadly delineating the groundwater regime within the temperate Rosebery catchment, western Tasmania, Australia. The mountainous Rosebery catchment contains the large, active, underground, polymetallic Rosebery mine, based on a sulphide deposit hosted in the Cambrian Mount Read Volcanics. Rainfall in the Rosebery region far exceeds evapotranspiration and supports a dense cover of vegetation. The Rosebery groundwater system provides an example of an area in which groundwater management and hydrogeological research is in its infancy, as it is in many regions with similar settings. Although the area has been glaciated historically, mine data, particularly rock quality designator (RQD) values, provides clear evidence of: (i) a weathering induced increase in permeability within 100 m of the natural ground surface; (ii) an increased permeability associated with shear zones and faults; and (iii) beyond a depth of 100 m, a uniform decrease in permeability with depth below the ground surface. Insights into groundwater flow have been provided by qualitative and quantitative observations of piezometric level in 29 exploration drillholes, 8 piezometers, discharging groundwaters, and surface water flow monitoring points. Together, iii piezometric heads, flow rates, and calculated material properties have provided the framework for developing a conceptual model of the groundwater regime within the Rosebery catchment. The groundwater flow system is typified by a deep fractured aquifer (which contain the mine voids), overlain by surficial glacial deposits and weathered material. Significant interaction between surface waters and groundwater was observed throughout the catchment. Geochemistry provided support for conceptual flows and justification of the modelling approaches. Potential acid-generating and neutralising minerals were identified by examining whole-rock geochemistry. The net acid generation and acid consuming potential of Rosebery materials were quantified. The results indicated that mined materials at Rosebery have the potential to produce a significant volume of acid mine drainage. At the Rosebery mine, metal contaminated waters originate from localised point sources of sulphides, such as tailings dams, waste rock, and mine workings. Waters are contaminated by AMD, resulting in elevated levels of H2SO4 as well as the elements Pb, Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mg Cd, Al, and Ca. The Mg content of AMD indicates that neutralisation is occurring, most likely through the dissolution of the hypogene minerals chlorite, ankerite, and dolomite. Although background surface waters and contaminated mine waters are acidic, regionally the groundwaters sampled are near- neutral. The quantification of the important flows in the conceptual model of the Rosebery catchment allows the construction of a water balance, which provides a reasonable estimation of annual flows. The average precipitation rate across the catchment is estimated at 8.4 m3/s. The water budget for the Rosebery catchment is: (i) 42% of precipitation runs off to become true surface water flow (including interflow); (ii) 24% of precipitation is lost to evapotranspiration; (iii) 17% of iv precipitation becomes groundwater and is discharged as baseflow into creeks and rivers within the catchment; and (iv) 18% remains as groundwater discharging into the regional groundwater system outside of the catchment or into the Pieman River system. The water balance highlights the importance of groundwater in the catchment, with a groundwater to surface water flow rate ratio of 1:1.2. The water balance was applied to three scenarios: (i) a quantification of the contribution of the open pit to underground flows; (ii) the filling of the southern exploration decline; and (iii) the filling of the mine after decommissioning. This work indicated that the open cut makes only a minor contribution to underground water flow and that the mine is expected to fill to a decant point after six years. A steady-state, 3D numerical groundwater flow MODFLOW model with a geometry representative of the hydrogeologic environment around the Rosebery mine and surrounding catchment was produced. To satisfactorily represent the dual aquifer system, deep fracture flow on a regional scale was represented by a continuum approach to couple with true porous media flow (and shallow fracture flow) in the near surface aquifer. The groundwater model was calibrated to the local observations and water balance to represent the mine whilst in operation. A predictive closure scenario was undertaken using the calibrated model in a non-operational state by eliminating pumping to simulate a flooded mine. Particle tracking was used to plot potential contaminant flow pathways from the mine in the Rosebery catchment. Numerical modelling identified that the potential hydrogeological area of influence of the mine was chiefly controlled by the topography of the host catchment. The topographically-driven western flows off Mount Black are redirected south, primarily by the conduits of the mine workings. Conceptualisation of the groundwater regime improved using computer generated 3D visualisation, and through the numerical v modelling exercise. The numerical modelling suggested that the potential area of discharge for contaminated mine waters is far more limited in extent than was previously believed by mine personnel. This area is limited to: (i) areas along the Stitt River and Rosebery Creeks, which are already experiencing significant acid mine drainage contamination; and (ii) a very limited area south and north of the Pieman River’s confluence with the Stitt River. The implications of understanding the area of potential influence are: (i) resources for future monitoring investigations can be focussed in this discrete area; (ii) the scale of future modelling efforts can be restricted to this area, improving detail and limiting computational requirements; and (iii) background monitoring beyond this area can be used to further test the model and provide data for future model calibration and validation. The present study at Rosebery has wider implications for researching groundwater in wet temperate mountainous sulphide mining terrains. The characteristic feature of such terrains is the local spatial variation in precipitation, evapotranspiration, and therefore recharge. Estimating a representative recharge remains the pivotal quantification for undertaking groundwater investigations in such climates. The significant interaction of surface waters and the groundwater system in wet, temperate, mountainous environments requires modelling to be capable of accounting for this interaction. Surface water and groundwater interactions present an opportunity to investigate the groundwater regime at the surface and near surface in shallow drillholes. Gauging stream flow for baseflow contribution provides important quantification of groundwater flow where suitable drillhole flow data is scarce, a common state in mined settings. Mine outflows also provide an important quantification of vi groundwater flow on a large scale. The present study proposed a method for amalgamating these data which is applicable in other similar environments. The challenges encountered in the present study provide insight into planning for similar mining projects. Prior to the present study, there was no general knowledge of the groundwater patterns of the region, and no clear idea of whether the Rosebery mine had an influence on the regional groundwater regime. There was no historical information of the type that is usually associated with groundwater resource investigations, and the nature of exploration drillholes meant that some typical groundwater research methodologies were not practical at Rosebery. This resulted in the investigation taking
Recommended publications
  • Murchison Highway Upgrades
    2012 (No. 26) _______________ PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA _______________ PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS Murchison Highway Upgrades ______________ Presented to His Excellency the Governor pursuant to the provisions of the Public Works Committee Act 1914. ______________ MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE Legislative Council House of Assembly Mr Harriss (Chairman) Mr Booth Mr Hall Mr Brooks Ms White TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 2 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 2 PROJECT COSTS ............................................................................................................ 3 EVIDENCE ...................................................................................................................... 4 DOCUMENTS TAKEN INTO EVIDENCE ......................................................................... 9 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION .................................................................... 9 1 INTRODUCTION To His Excellency the Honourable Peter Underwood, AC, Governor in and over the State of Tasmania and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCY The Committee has investigated the following proposals: - Murchison Highway Upgrades and now has the honour to present the Report to Your Excellency in accordance with the Public Works Committee Act 1914. BACKGROUND The Murchison Highway
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Land Use Planning Strategy
    " " " " " " " " " !"#$%&'(#$%&')*&+,%,(*-%)#"%.,(**+*/%#$0($"/1%" " #".$"23"0%4567% " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Prepared for West Coast Council" " By:" ႛ Integrated Planning Solutions; ႛ Essential Economics; and ႛ Ratio Consultants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
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management in the Anthony–Pieman Hydropower Scheme
    Water management in the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme Pieman Sustainability Review June 2015 FACT SHEET Background The Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme provides a highly valued and reliable source of electricity. The total water storage of the hydropower scheme is 512 gigalitres and the average annual generation is 2367 gigawatt hours. Construction of the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme has resulted in creation of water storages (lakes) and alterations to the natural flow of existing rivers and streams. The Pieman Sustainability Review is a review of operational, social and environmental aspects of the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme that are influenced by Hydro Tasmania. This fact sheet elaborates on water management issues presented in the summary report, available at http://www.hydro.com.au/pieman-sustainability-review Water storage levels in the Anthony–Pieman Water levels have been monitored at these storages since hydropower scheme their creation in stages between 1981 and 1991. The Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme includes eight Headwater storages: Lake Mackintosh and Lake water storages, classified as headwater storages (Lakes Murchison Mackintosh and Murchison), diversion storages (Lakes Lakes Mackintosh and Murchison are the main headwater Henty and Newton and White Spur Pond) and run-of-river storages for the Anthony–Pieman hydropower scheme. storages (Lakes Rosebery, Plimsoll and Pieman). Lakes The water level fluctuates over the entire operating range Murchison, Henty and Newton and White Spur Pond do not from Normal Minimum Operating Level (NMOL) to Full release water directly to a power station; rather they are Supply Level (FSL) (Figures 1, 2). used to transfer water to other storages within the scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration Licence 29/2002 Selina NW Tasmania 2005 Partial Release
    ACN 094 543 389 Exploration Licence 29/2002 Selina NW Tasmania 2005 Partial Release from EL29/2002 report to Mineral Resources Tasmania S Brooks 02/05/2005 Adamus Resources Ltd PO Box 568 West Perth WA6872 1 Contents 1 Summary 2 Introduction 3 Geology 4 Previous Work 4.1 Selina 4.2 Lake Dora – Rolleston 4.3 Lake Dora – Spicer 4.4 East Beatrice 5 Reporting Period Work and Discussion 6 Conclusions and Recommendations 7 Bibliography Figures Figure 1: EL28/2002 Retention and release areas 2 1 Summary Exploration Licence 29/2002 located in western Tasmania and held by Adamus Resources Ltd, covers prospective units of the Mt Read Volcanics. These units are host to a number of large VHMS deposits in the nearby area, including Rosebery Pb-Zn, Hellyer Zn-Pb-Ag-Au and the large copper deposits of the Mount Lyell field. The licence area has been the site of historical copper mining in the 1890’s to early 1900’s. Concerted modern exploration for base metal VHMS deposits has continued since the 1950’s. Following review of historical and 2 aeromagnetic data 51 kmP P has been identified as non-prospective and marked for release. 2 Introduction The Selina Exploration Licence 29/2002, a 24 km long by 5 km wide belt, is located in Western Tasmania, between Queenstown to the south and Rosebery to the north. EL 29/2002 is found on the Sophia (8014) and Franklin (8013) 1:100,000 map sheets, and initially covered an area of 2 109kmP .P Topography is rugged and varied, comprising steep timbered slopes with deeply incised valleys and gentler button grass marshland on elevated plateau’s and broad plains.
    [Show full text]
  • For Personal Use Only Use Personal for UNITY MINING LIMITED – SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2015
    Sustainability Report Year to 30 June 2015 For personal use only UNITY MINING LIMITED – SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2015 Who are we? Australia Dargues Reef Bendigo Goldfield West Africa Senegal - SangolaSangola Ghana - Homase/AkrokerrHomase/Akrokerrii Ghana - Manso AmenfiAmenfi Gabon - Oyem & Ngoutou Henty Gold Mine Unity Mining Limited (ASX: UML) The nearest main towns are This report reviews Unity (“Unity” or “the Company”) is Rosebery, 10 km to the north; Mining’s economic, social and an Australian gold explorer and Zeehan, 19 km to the west; and environmental performance for the producer which owns and operates Queenstown, 23 km to the south. period 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015. the Henty Gold Mine on the West This report covers the activities at The Henty Gold Mine has produced Coast of Tasmania, the Dargues the Henty Gold Mine, the Dargues in excess of 1 million ounces of Gold Mine in New South Wales Gold Mine and the Kangaroo Flat gold over a 19 year period. and the Kangaroo Flat Project in Project during the reporting period. Victoria. Unity is also involved in The Dargues Gold Mine is The data generated for this report gold exploration in West Africa located near Braidwood in NSW, has been collated and analysed, through its investment in GoldStone approximately 60 km southeast and is publically disseminated with Resources Limited. of Canberra. The mine is located the objective of: within an historical alluvial mining The Company’s vision is to be a area that was discovered in • informing stakeholders of successful mid-tier gold mining the early 1800’s and which has management actions and company, operating multiple produced over 1.2 million ounces strategies; mines in a responsible manner of gold.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Heritage Register Datasheet
    Tasmanian Heritage Register Datasheet 103 Macquarie Street (GPO Box 618) Hobart Tasmania 7001 Phone: 1300 850 332 (local call cost) Email: [email protected] Web: www.heritage.tas.gov.au Name: Tasmania Gold Mine Site and Beaconsfield Mine & Heritage THR ID Number: 5674 Centre Status: Permanently Registered Municipality: West Tamar Council Tier: State State Location Addresses Title References Property Id Lot 1 WEST ST, BEACONSFIELD 7270 TAS 151869/1 2808214 6 WEST ST, BEACONSFIELD 7270 TAS 107045/1 7898327 West ST, BEACONSFIELD 7270 TAS 168283/1 6084954 , Beaconsfield 7270 TAS N/A 2087445 Former Boiler House Former Hart Shaft Former Grubb Shaft Beaconsfield Mine & (right), Tasmania Gold Engine House. Engine House. Heritage Centre. Mine. ©DPIPWE 2017 ©DPIPWE 2017 ©DPIPWE 2017 ©DPIPWE 2017 Hart Shaft Headframe, Former Mine Offices, Former Mine Offices, Tasmania Gold Mine. Tasmania Gold Mine. Tasmania Gold Mine. ©DPIPWE 2018 ©DPIPWE 2019 ©DPIPWE 2019 Setting: The former Tasmania Gold Mine and associated buildings, ruins and archaeological features are located in the northern Tasmanian town of Beaconsfield, situated in the Tamar Valley. The sites are located on the gentle slope of a hill, leading to Weld Street, the main thoroughfare in the town. To the west is the bushland of Cabbage Tree Hill; to the south, the urban residences; to the east, the town’s commercial heart on Weld Street, and to the north, the Miners’ Reserve (incorporating THR #5673) and Shaw Street. The façades of the historic Tasmania Gold Mine and the Hart Shaft Headframe in particular are important geographical landmarks in the town, integral parts of the streetscape and a focal point for the residents of the mining township.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Waterways Report
    Annual Waterways Report Pieman Catchment Water Assessment Branch 2009 ISSN: 1835-8489 Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries and Water, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIW has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries and Water, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Department of Primary Industries and Water Pieman Catchment Contents 1. About the catchment 2. Streamflow and Water Allocation 3. River Health 1. About the catchment The Pieman catchment drains a land mass of more than 4,100 km 2 stretching from about Lake St Clair in the Central Highlands west more than 90 km to Granville Harbour on the rugged West Coast of Tasmania. Major rivers draining the catchment are the Savage, Donaldson and Whyte rivers in the lower catchment, the Pieman, Huskisson rivers in the middle catchment and the Mackintosh, Murchison and Anthony rivers in the upper catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Henty Gold Limited A.C.N
    Henty Gold Mine Howards Road HENTY TAS 7467 PO Box 231 QUEENSTOWN TAS 7467 Australia Telephone: + 61 3 6473 2444 Facsimile: + 61 3 6473 1857 HENTY GOLD LIMITED A.C.N. 008 764 412 Final Report 2003 EL 13/2001 Langdon HELD BY: AURIONGOLD EXPLORATION PTY LTD MANAGER & OPERATOR: AURIONGOLD EXPLORATION PTY LTD AUTHOR(s): Michael Vicary 24 March 2003 PROSPECTS: MAP SHEETS: 1:250,000: 1:100,000: GEOGRAPHIC COORDS Min East: Max East: Min North: Max North: COMMODITY(s): Au, Cu, Pb, Zn KEY WORDS: Distribution: o AurionGold Exploration Information Centre Reference: o AurionGold Exploration - Zeehan o Mineral Resources Tasmania Langdon EL 13/2001 Relinquishment Report 2003 SUMMARY This report documents the work completed on EL 13/2001 – Langdon by AurionGold Exploration. In late 2002, AurionGold Exploration was acquired by Placer Dome Asia Pacific and a detailed review of Tasmanian exploration program completed. As a result of the review all non-mine lease exploration was suspended and several exploration tenements (including the Langdon EL) were recommended to be relinquished. i Langdon EL 13/2001 Relinquishment Report 2003 Table of Contents SUMMARY i 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Location and Access 1 1.2 Topography and Vegetation 1 1.3 Tenure 1 1.4 Aims 3 1.5 Exploration Model 3 2 PREVIOUS EXPLORATION 6 3WORK COMPLETED 7 4 REHABILITATION 8 5 DISCUSSION and RECOMMENDATIONS 8 6. REFERENCES 9 List of Figures 1 Langdon EL Location Map 2 Henty Model 3 Regional Geology 4 Chargeability Image ii Langdon EL 13/2001 Relinquishment Report 2003 1 INTRODUCTION EL 13/2001 - Langdon is held and explored by AurionGold Exploration Pty Ltd (formerly Goldfields Exploration Pty Ltd).
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Gold Fields in Australia the Rise and Decline of a British Mining House, 1926–1998
    CONSOLIDATED GOLD FIELDS IN AUSTRALIA THE RISE AND DECLINE OF A BRITISH MINING HOUSE, 1926–1998 CONSOLIDATED GOLD FIELDS IN AUSTRALIA THE RISE AND DECLINE OF A BRITISH MINING HOUSE, 1926–1998 ROBERT PORTER Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463496 ISBN (online): 9781760463502 WorldCat (print): 1149151564 WorldCat (online): 1149151633 DOI: 10.22459/CGFA.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover photograph John Agnew (left) at a mining operation managed by Bewick Moreing, Western Australia. Source: Herbert Hoover Presidential Library. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS List of Figures, Tables, Charts and Boxes ...................... vii Preface ................................................xiii Acknowledgements ....................................... xv Notes and Abbreviations ................................. xvii Part One: Context—Consolidated Gold Fields 1. The Consolidated Gold Fields of South Africa ...............5 2. New Horizons for a British Mining House .................15 Part Two: Early Investments in Australia 3. Western Australian Gold ..............................25 4. Broader Associations .................................57 5. Lake George and New Guinea ..........................71 Part Three: A New Force in Australian Mining 1960–1966 6. A New Approach to Australia ...........................97 7. New Men and a New Model ..........................107 8. A Range of Investments. .115 Part Four: Expansion, Consolidation and Restructuring 1966–1981 9. Move to an Australian Shareholding .....................151 10. Expansion and Consolidation 1966–1976 ................155 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro 4 Water Storage
    TERM OF REFERENCE 3: STATE-WIDE WATER STORAGE MANAGEMENT The causes of the floods which were active in Tasmania over the period 4-7 June 2016 including cloud-seeding, State-wide water storage management and debris management. 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Cause of the Floods (a) It is clear that the flooding that affected northern Tasmania (including the Mersey, Forth, Ouse and South Esk rivers) during the relevant period was directly caused by “a persistent and very moist north-easterly airstream” which resulted in “daily [rainfall] totals [that were] unprecedented for any month across several locations in the northern half of Tasmania”, in some cases in excess of 200mm.1 (b) This paper addresses Hydro Tasmania’s water storage management prior to and during the floods. 1.2 Overview (a) In 2014, Tasmania celebrated 100 years of hydro industrialisation and the role it played in the development of Tasmania. Hydro Tasmania believes that understanding the design and purpose of the hydropower infrastructure that was developed to bring electricity and investment to the state is an important starting point to provide context for our submission. The Tasmanian hydropower system design and operation is highly complex and is generally not well understood in the community. We understand that key stakeholder groups are seeking to better understand the role that hydropower operations may have in controlling or contributing to flood events in Tasmania. (b) The hydropower infrastructure in Tasmania was designed and installed for the primary purpose of generating hydro-electricity. Flood mitigation was not a primary objective in the design of Hydro Tasmania’s dams when the schemes were developed, and any flood mitigation benefit is a by-product of their hydro- generation operation.
    [Show full text]
  • EPBC Act Referral
    EPBC Act referral Note: PDF may contain fields not relevant to your application. These fields will appear blank or unticked. Please disregard these fields. Title of proposal 2021/8909 - South Marionoak Tailings Storage Facility, Rosebery, Tasmania Section 1 Summary of your proposed action 1.1 Project industry type Mining 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities The proposed action is the construction and operation of a new Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) at South Marionoak (SMO) in proximity to Rosebery, Tasmania within the West Coast municipality (South Marionoak TSF). The South Marionoak TSF will form part of the MMG Rosebery mine operations and will allow for piping and disposal of tailings resulting from the processing plant. The proposed South Marionoak TSF will provide long term essential tailings storage for the Rosebery Mine. Rosebery Mine has operated continuously since 1936 as an underground polymetallic base metal mine with a capacity to produce up to 1,100,000 tonnes of ore per year. Rosebery produces zinc, copper and lead concentrates, as well as gold ore. The mine has used the Bobadil TSF, situated approximately 2.5 km north of the mine, and 2/5 Dam TSF situated approximately 1 km south of the mine. The TSFs are expected to reach capacity within the next few years, and a new TSF will be required to support the mine’s ongoing operation. The South Marionoak TSF has been designed as an off-stream facility with storage volume of approximately 25 Mm3 and an anticipated lifespan of around 42 years (based on current tailings production rates).
    [Show full text]
  • Iconic Lands: Wilderness As a Reservation Criterion for World Heritage
    ICONIC LANDS Wilderness as a reservation criterion for World Heritage Mario Gabriele Roberto Rimini A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Environmental Studies University of New South Wales April 2010 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My gratitude goes to the Director of the Institute of Environmental Studies, John Merson, for the knowledge and passion he shared with me and for his trust, and to the precious advice and constant support of my co-supervisor, Stephen Fortescue. My family, their help and faith, have made this achievement possible. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I Introduction ………………………………………………………………………….…...…… 8 Scope and Rationale.………………………………………………………………………….…...…………. 8 Background…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12 Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 22 Structure…………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 23 CHAPTER II The Wilderness Idea ……………………………………………………………………........ 27 Early conceptions …………………………………………………………………………………………..... 27 American Wilderness: a world model …………………………………………………….....………………. 33 The Wilderness Act: from ideal to conservation paradigm …………………………………........…………. 43 The values of wilderness ……………………………………………………………………….…………… 48 Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………….…………. 58 CHAPTER III Wilderness as a conservation and land management category worldwide …………......... 61 The US model: wilderness legislation in Canada, New Zealand and Australia …………………………… 61 Canada: a wilderness giant ………………………………………………………………………..…...........
    [Show full text]