DOCSLIB.ORG

Core 1..164 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 9.00)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Core 1..164 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 9.00) CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 141 Ï NUMBER 164 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 39th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, June 5, 2007 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 10123 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, June 5, 2007 The House met at 10 a.m. This Holodomor-Genocide inflicted a deep and lasting scar on the Ukrainian community throughout the world. Many survivors of the famine and their descendants later immigrated to Canada. This famine was an attempt to crush the longing for freedom and to erase Prayers all aspirations for an independent Ukrainian state. Part of the Soviet strategy also involved suppressing, distorting and wiping out all information about the Ukrainian famine, now and ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS into the future to be known as the Holodomor-Genocide. Ï (1005) By enacting this legislation and recognizing a day of remem- [English] brance of this horrific tragedy, Canada will reaffirm her core values GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS of defending human rights and condemning all injustices committed by humans against their fellow human beings, and to condemn the Mr. Tom Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of greatest of all evils, genocide. the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform, CPC): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) Order 36(8) I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to four petitions. *** *** PETITIONS COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE INCOME TRUSTS HEALTH Mr. Ken Boshcoff (Thunder Bay—Rainy River, Lib.): Mr. Mr. Rob Merrifield (Yellowhead, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I have the Speaker, this petition is with regard to the broken promises from the honour to present, in both official languages, the ninth report of the Government of Canada on income trusts. The petition represents Standing Committee on Health. another group of citizens who have been hurt by the income trust fiasco and the broken promises. The petitioners are mostly The committee has studied Bill C-42, An Act to amend the concerned with the recklessness of this and the fact that there was Quarantine Act, and has agreed to report it to the House with an emphatic promise that there would be no tampering with income amendments. trusts. *** With expert witnesses now providing clear evidence that the UKRAINIAN HOLODOMOR-GENOCIDE REMEMBRANCE finance minister's decision has been based on flawed methodology, DAY ACT the petitioners trust that the government will rectify income trusts and make good and undo their broken promise. Mr. Borys Wrzesnewskyj (Etobicoke Centre, Lib.): moved for leave to introduce Bill C-450, An Act respecting a national day of *** remembrance of the Ukrainian Holodomor-Genocide. QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER He said: Mr. Speaker, it is with solemnity that I introduce my private member's bill, the Ukrainian Holodomor-Genocide Remem- Mr. Tom Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of brance Day Act. the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I ask that all questions be The purpose of the bill is to establish the fourth Saturday in allowed to stand. November as a day of remembrance for the estimated seven million to ten million Ukrainians who died a horrifying slow death from The Deputy Speaker: Is that agreed? starvation in 1932-33 during the famine masterminded, organized and carried out by the Soviet regime under Stalin. Some hon. members: Agreed. 10124 COMMONS DEBATES June 5, 2007 Government Orders POINTS OF ORDER [Translation] STANDING COMMITTEE ON ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN Let us now turn to the Speaker’s ruling of October 3, 2006 DEVELOPMENT—SPEAKER'S RULING allowing the use of Standing Order 56.1 to extend, in an open-ended The Deputy Speaker: Before going to orders of the day I would fashion, the debate on Bill C-24, the Softwood Lumber bill. like to give the ruling on the point of order raised by the hon. [English] member for Wascana regarding the use of Standing Order 56.1 to timetable the proceedings on a bill in the Standing Committee on It should be noted at the outset that when Standing Order 56.1 was Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development. used in reference to Bill C-24, the bill was then before the House at second reading, not before a standing committee. In allowing the use On May 31, 2007 during routine proceedings the government of Standing Order 56.1 in that case the Speaker did so with some House leader sought, but did not obtain, unanimous consent of the concern and on the basis that: House to move the following motion: The precedents available to me, including my own previous rulings, are [therefore] insufficient for me to rule the motion out of order on this occasion. That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practices of the House, when the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development convenes This is part of the Speaker's ruling quoted by the Parliamentary a meeting, it shall not be adjourned or suspended until it completes the committee stage of Bill C-44 except pursuant to a motion by a parliamentary secretary and, Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of provided the bill is adopted by the committee, agrees to report the bill to the House Commons. At the time the Speaker had more to say. He also within two sitting days following the completion of the committee stage. encouraged, as had Mr. Speaker Parent before him, the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs to examine the He then moved the motion again pursuant to Standing Order 56.1 appropriate use of this Standing Order, a pretty clear indication of and the motion was adopted when fewer than 25 members rose to the difficulties with which the House has had to deal when Standing object. A short time later, the hon. member for Wascana raised a Order 56.1 has been invoked in questionable circumstances. point of order regarding the use of Standing Order 56.1. He was supported by interventions from the hon. member for Joliette and the In the present case, the Chair has looked carefully at the wording hon. member for Hamilton Centre, while the Parliamentary Secretary of Standing Order 56.1, which states in reference to the House itself to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons argued that the Standing Order can be used to move motions in relation to that the motion adopted earlier had been appropriately presented “the management of its business” and “ the arrangement of its under Standing Order 56.1. proceedings”. Interestingly, the only reference to committees in the Standing Order is one allowing motions for “the establishing of the Given that a meeting of the Standing Committee on Aboriginal powers of its committees”, suggesting that the rule was meant to be Affairs and Northern Development was imminent, I delivered an used not to reach into the conduct of standing committee affairs to immediate ruling promising that the Chair would return to the House direct them, but rather in a routine manner, to provide them powers later with reasons. I am now prepared to do so. they do not already possess. A review of the previous uses of Standing Order 56.1 appears to support this. The only examples Ï (1010) dealing with standing committees or standing committee activity the [Translation] Chair has been able to find have to do with granting standing committees the power to travel. The power to travel is, as all hon. First, the Chair would like to thank all hon. members who members know, a power standing committees do not possess and so intervened on the point of order for their contributions on this the use of Standing Order 56.1 in that regard falls squarely within the question and is particularly grateful that members have taken note of parameters of the rule. certain key rulings, specifically those the Speaker delivered on September 18, 2001 and October 3, 2006. Accordingly, to repeat the words I used when this matter was first raised, the use of Standing Order 56.1 to direct the business of the [English] committee, of any committee, is a new development in the House and one that I find out of order. A key element in my ruling today is the fundamental precept that standing committees are masters of their own procedure. Indeed, so I thank all hon. members who intervened for bringing this matter entrenched is that precept that only in a select few Standing Orders to the attention of the House. does the House make provision for intervening directly into the conduct of standing committee affairs. In addition to the power the House has to give instructions to committees by way of a substantive motion that is subject to debate, there are, of course, Standing Orders GOVERNMENT ORDERS 57 and 78, which can be used by the House to allocate time or for closure proceedings on a bill in committee. It is toward the use of [Translation] these very instruments that the Speaker directed the House in his CRIMINAL CODE ruling of September 18, 2001, on Debates page 5257, where, as the hon. member for Wascana pointed out, the Speaker stated: The House resumed from June 4, consideration of the motion that Bill C-35, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (reverse onus in bail The expanded use of Standing Order 56.1 since 1997 causes the Chair serious concern.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thesis Draft
    ! ! ! ! ! The Mobile Citizen: Canada’s Treatment of Mobility in Immigration, Citizenship, and Foreign Policy ! Alex M. Johnston ! ! Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science ! ! School of Political Studies Faculty of Social Science University of Ottawa ! ! © Alex M. Johnston, Ottawa, Canada, 2017. The Mobile Citizen ii Abstract ! Mobility, as the ability among newcomers and citizens to move temporarily and circularly across international borders and between states, has become a pervasive norm for a significant portion of Canada’s population. Despite its pervasive nature and the growing public interest, however, current research has been limited in how Canadian policies are reacting to the ability of citizens and newcomers to move. This thesis seeks to fill that gap by analyzing Canada’s treatment of mobility within and across policies of immigration, citizenship and foreign affairs. An analytical mobility framework is developed to incorporate interdisciplinary work on human migration and these policy domains. Using this framework, an examination of policy developments in each domain in the last decade reveals that they diverge in isolation and from a whole-of-government perspective around the treatment of mobility. In some instances policy accommodates or even embraces mobility, and in others it restricts it. The Mobile Citizen iii Table of Contents Abstract i Table of Contents and List of Table and Figures ii Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Body Histories and the Limits of Life in Asian Canadian Literature
    Body Histories and the Limits of Life in Asian Canadian Literature by Ranbir Kaur Banwait M.A., Simon Fraser University, 2008 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Ranbir Kaur Banwait 2014 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2014 Approval Name: Ranbir Kaur Banwait Degree: Doctor of Philosophy (English) Title of Thesis: Body Histories and the Limits of Life in Asian Canadian Literature Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Sean Zwagerman Associate Professor of English Dr. Christine Kim Co-Senior Supervisor Assistant Professor of English Dr. David Chariandy Co-Senior Supervisor Associate Professor of English Dr. Larissa Lai Associate Professor of English University of Calgary Dr. Lara Campbell Internal Examiner Associate Professor of Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies Dr. Donald Goellnicht External Examiner Professor of English and Cultural Studies McMaster University Date Defended/Approved: July 24, 2014 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract Histories of racialization in Canada are closely tied to the development of eugenics and racial hygiene movements, but also to broader concerns, expressed throughout Western modernity, regarding the “health” of nation states and their subjects. This dissertation analyses books by Velma Demerson, Hiromi Goto, David Chariandy, Rita Wong, Roy Miki and Larissa Lai to argue that Asian Canadian literature reveals, in heightened critical terms, how the politics of racial difference has
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of C-6 Is to Create One Class of Canadian. Unless Amended, the Bill Will Not Achieve Its Objective
    The purpose of C-6 is to create one class of Canadian. Unless amended, the Bill will not achieve its objective. Preamble: “A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian.” –Justin Trudeau, acceptance speech as Prime Minister, October 19, 2015. “We believe very strongly that there should be only one class of Canadians, that all Canadians are equal, that a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian from coast to coast to coast.” –John McCallum, Citizenship Minister, February 3, 2016. Fabulous words. Now let’s make it a reality. Bill C-6, as written, is but a start- it doesn’t get Canada to the Promised Land. If passed into law, unequal rights will continue, resulting in different classes of Canadian citizen- some with more rights than others. There will also be people denied citizenship altogether due to ongoing discrimination within the Act. My point in the following discussion is to exemplify the confusion and unjust legislation that bonds us together as Canadians. Trying to explain our current citizenship act is easy vs. deciding who under the law qualifies to call themselves Canadians, and why. For example, Canadian citizenship as we know it is an amalgamation of all the previous citizenship and immigration legislation going back more than 100 years. As such, the current Act is not a complete code for citizenship and nationality in that certain provisions of the 1947 Act must still be read as unrepealed. The authority for this is the Interpretation Act 1985 (44[h]), which specifies that provisions of a repealed Act must be read as unrepealed if those provisions are required to give effect to the Current Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Migrant Workers: Precarious and Unsupported
    Conseil canadien pour les réfugiés Canadian Council for Refugees Bill C-6 An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act Submission of the Canadian Council for Refugees April 2016 Canadian Council for Refugees Introduction The Canadian Council for Refugees welcomes the introduction of amendments to the Citizenship Act through Bill C-6, reversing many provisions of Bill C-24, the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act that we opposed.1 The CCR also commends the new government for making this a priority piece of legislation. Bill C-6 provides an excellent opportunity to create an inclusive citizenship regime that promotes maximum civic participation and engagement. We need to bring down barriers to citizenship, especially for already disadvantaged groups such as refugees, the elderly, and women. In line with Canada’s international obligations, we encourage the government to craft a new citizenship regime to which all applicants will have equal access without discrimination. Canada has a legal obligation to facilitate access to citizenship for refugees: “The Contracting States shall as far as possible facilitate the assimilation and naturalization of refugees. They shall in particular make every effort to expedite naturalization proceedings and to reduce as far as possible the charges and costs of such proceedings.” (Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Article 34). Access to nationality and citizenship is an important factor in the participation of newcomers in the political process. Participation in the political process, in turn, increases the sense of belonging and identification with the immigrants’ new country. At present, non-citizens in Canada are unable to vote in federal, provincial/territorial, and municipal elections.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCI Issue 17 1..122
    Second Session Deuxième session de la Forty-first Parliament, 2013-14 quarante et unième législature, 2013-2014 Proceedings of the Standing Délibérations du Comité Senate Committee on sénatorial permanent des Social Affairs, Affaires sociales, Science and des sciences et Technology de la technologie Chair: Président : The Honourable KELVIN KENNETH OGILVIE L'honorable KELVIN KENNETH OGILVIE Tuesday, June 10, 2014 Le mardi 10 juin 2014 Wednesday, June 11, 2014 Le mercredi 11 juin 2014 Thursday, June 12, 2014 Le jeudi 12 juin 2014 Issue No. 17 Fascicule no 17 First, second and third (final) Première, deuxième et troisième (dernière) meetings on: réunions concernant : Subject matter of Bill C-24, An Act to amend the La teneur du projet de loi C-24, Loi modifiant la Loi sur la Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments citoyenneté et d'autres lois en conséquence to other Acts APPEARING: COMPARAÎT: The Honourable Chris Alexander, P.C., M.P., L'honorable Chris Alexander, C.P., député, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration WITNESSES: TÉMOINS : (See back cover) (Voir à l'endos) 51515-51520-51529 STANDING SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMITÉ SÉNATORIAL PERMANENT DES SOCIAL AFFAIRS, SCIENCE AND AFFAIRES SOCIALES, DES SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGY DE LA TECHNOLOGIE The Honourable Kelvin Kenneth Ogilvie, Chair Président : L'honorable Kelvin Kenneth Ogilvie The Honourable Art Eggleton, P.C., Deputy Chair Vice-président : L'honorable Art Eggleton, C.P. and et The Honourable Senators: Les honorables sénateurs
    [Show full text]
  • Citizenship Revocation in the Mainstream Press: a Case of Re-Ethni- Cization?
    CITIZENSHIP REVOCATION IN THE MAINSTREAM PRESS: A CASE OF RE-ETHNI- CIZATION? ELKE WINTER IVANA PREVISIC Abstract. Under the original version of the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act (2014), dual citizens having committed high treason, terrorism or espionage could lose their Canadian citizenship. In this paper, we examine how the measure was dis- cussed in Canada’s mainstream newspapers. We ask: who/what is seen as the target of citizenship revocation? What does this tell us about the direction that Canadian citizenship is moving towards? Our findings show that Canadian newspapers were more often critical than supportive of the citizenship revocation provision. However, the press ignored the involvement of non-Muslim, white, Western-origin Canadians in terrorist acts and interpreted the measure as one that was mostly affecting Canadian Muslims. Thus, despite advocating for equal citizenship in principle, in their writing and reporting practice, Canadian newspapers constructed Canadian Muslims as sus- picious and less Canadian nonetheless. Keywords: Muslim Canadians; Citizenship; Terrorism; Canada; Revocation Résumé: Au sein de la version originale de la Loi renforçant la citoyenneté cana- dienne (2014), les citoyens canadiens ayant une double citoyenneté et ayant été condamnés pour haute trahison, pour terrorisme ou pour espionnage, auraient pu se faire révoquer leur citoyenneté canadienne. Dans cet article, nous étudions comment ce projet de loi fut discuté au sein de la presse canadienne. Nous cherchons à répondre à deux questions: Qui/quoi est perçu comme pouvant faire l’objet d’une révocation de citoyenneté? En quoi cela nous informe-t-il sur les orientations futures de la citoy- enneté canadienne? Nos résultats démontrent que les journaux canadiens sont plus critiques à l’égard de la révocation de la citoyenneté que positionnés en sa faveur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Party of Canada and the Politics of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism (2006-2015)
    THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF CANADA AND THE POLITICS OF CITIZENSHIP, IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURALISM (2006-2015) JOHN CARLAW A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO SEPTEMBER 2019 © JOHN CARLAW, 2019 Abstract This dissertation assesses the modern Conservative Party of Canada and government’s (2006- 2015) discourses, political approach and policy record in the fields of citizenship, immigration and multiculturalism. This is done in the context of the party’s evolution from its Reform Party and Canadian Alliance predecessors on the terrain of a Canadian settler colonial state with significant racialized and ethnicized (im)migrant and refugee populations from whom some electoral support is required to achieve and exercise power. The main argument of this dissertation is that the Canadian Alliance Party’s absorption of the former Progressive Conservative Party of Canada saw the birth of a new Conservative Party that at its core remained an exclusionary political force whose authoritarian populist approach to politics and policy reinforced and further intensified existing social hierarchies between settler colonial and (im)migrant Canadians, particularly with their treatment of Muslims, refugees, migrant workers and prospective citizens. Their policies and policy-making approach also greatly accelerated the further decline of permanent in favour of temporary or “two-step” immigration, family class immigration, and the public and parliament’s role in making immigration policy. To achieve and maintain power, however, the Conservative Party project had to be connected to an attempted hegemonic political project that could obtain enough support to win elections and govern.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming Ideal Canadians: the Cultural Adjustment and Citizenship Trials of British War Brides
    BECOMING IDEAL CANADIANS: THE CULTURAL ADJUSTMENT AND CITIZENSHIP TRIALS OF BRITISH WAR BRIDES BECOMING IDEAL CANADIANS: THE CULTURAL ADJUSTMENT AND CITIZENSHIP TRIALS OF BRITISH WAR BRIDES By CHELSEA V. BARRANGER, B.A. (Hons), M.A. A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University © by Chelsea V. Barranger, 2019 TITLE: Becoming Ideal Canadians: The Cultural Adjustment and Citizenship Trials of British War Brides AUTHOR: Chelsea V. Barranger, B.A. Hons (University of Western Ontario), M.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVSIOR: Dr. Ruth Frager NUMBER OF PAGES: 390 ii LAY ABSTRACT Most historical work about British war brides has been overly nostalgic and focussed on the collection and creation of interview anthologies; often created by these women and their children. Discussions of life in Canada and negative experiences are only briefly mentioned. This dissertation argues that this nostalgic view of war brides in the historical literature hides the immigration, settlement, and citizenship challenges faced by these women in Canada during and after the Second World War. The different experiences of these women reveal biases towards their background and gender, relationships damaged by the trauma of war, bureaucratic incompetence in the immigration and citizenship process, and raises important questions about national belonging and the nature of Canadian citizenship, from the post-war period to the present. iii ABSTRACT Historical work on British war brides has been limited to the creation and collection of nostalgic interview anthologies; often by the women themselves or their children. These anthologies focus on the meeting of Canadian servicemen and British women and the women’s journey to and reunion with their husbands in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • A Party for New Canadians? the Rhetoric and Reality of Neoconservative Citizenship and Immigration Policy
    A party for new Canadians? The rhetoric and reality of neoconservative citizenship and immigration policy John Carlaw1 Introduction The 2011 federal election saw the Conservatives complete their long march from Reform Party roots to majority government. With this victory former citizenship and immigration minister Jason Kenney declared them the “party of new Canadians.”2 Former Conservative and Reform stalwart Tom Flanagan wrote that the party had found a new “ethnic pillar” of electoral support.3 While the extent of these claims has been challenged, some have argued they offer a positive model to other con- servative parties worldwide.4 In some ways, the Conservatives have accommodated the party to Canada’s modern demographics. In government, they have maintained immigration levels for permanent residency and reached out to new Canadians and “ethnic voters” in a variety of ways5 as they seek to achieve Stephen Harper’s goal of making the Conservatives Canada’s “natural governing party.”6 However, rather than serving as a positive model, the party is better viewed as having taken a creative yet cynical, incremental approach to achieving a majority government and shifting the gravity of Canadian politics to the right. The Conserv- atives have fostered and in other ways maintained and even deepened exclusion- ary inclinations held over from their Reform (1987–2000) and Canadian Alliance The Harper Record 2008–2015 | Democracy 105 (2000–2003) predecessors. Theirs is a highly ideological and disciplinary approach to politics aimed at gaining a stable “minimum connected winning coalition”7 rather than seeking social consensus. The Conservative victory and time in power is best seen as the long-term culmination of a process of “Invasion from the Mar- gin” — the right margin — of Canada’s political system, as Flanagan once framed the Reform project.8 The Conservative government’s policies adversely affect many actual and aspiring immigrants and have weakened democracy in policy-making in these fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of Canadian Citizenship Certificate
    Copy Of Canadian Citizenship Certificate Zinciferous Kalman sometimes outprayed his Dubuffet veritably and pose so territorially! Discordant Dom ameliorating some whengadabouts Salomone and resonating is gabbroitic. his academism so occupationally! Expiring Nikki phonating meaningfully or apostatizes bang Certificate is also help us improve the copy of naturalization By birth given that naked person speaking either born in Canada or born outside Canada. A previous Canadian passport is not deed of Canadian citizenship Please enable that a Canadian birth certificate or a Canadian citizenship card is some valid as supporting ID for section 5 of the application. You go to live usa as an identification, only in which category you do not. Find are more about metropolitan new pocket and wicked is affected. Welcome to the FAQ website covering document topics in Canada. The compare a PM was handed the 1st Canadian citizenship. This will allow other government departments to validate citizenship information via an electronic validation system, as long as you give sufficient information in its place. You can also see an example of what each document looks like by selecting the name of the document. Citizenship Card is acceptable proof. We was not affiliated with or sponsored by the United States government or any government agency. Immigration Refugees and Citizenship Canada holds records of. Feds grant Lost Canadians citizenship but certificate to. You need may apply after your citizenship certificate. Doing it online takes you through a step by step process. Stop in canada when our new copy of the copy of canadian citizenship certificate of canada bearing the affidavits need depend on.
    [Show full text]
  • Statelessness in the Canadian Context an Updated Discussion Paper
    Statelessness in the Canadian Context An updated discussion paper Revised March 2012 Statelessness in the Canadian context: an updated discussion paper Revised March 2012 This paper was researched and written for UNHCR by Andrew Brouwer The author would like to thank Furio De Angelis, UNHCR Representative in Canada, Rana Khan, UNHCR Legal Officer, and Nadine Edirmanasinghe, UNHCR Associate Legal Officer, for their assistance and support for this update of the original July 2003 discussion paper. In addition, the author thanks Judith Kumin, former UNHCR Representative in Canada, Christine Aubin, former UNHCR Legal Officer; Carol Batchelor, former Senior Legal Officer (statelessness) UNHCR Headquarters in Geneva; Glynis Williams of Action Réfugiés Montréal and Ezat Mossallenejad of the Canadian Centre for Victims of Torture for their support and assistance with the original paper. Copyright: UNHCR, March 2012. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations or UNHCR. This paper may be freely quoted, cited and copied for academic, educational or other non-commercial purposes without prior permission from UNHCR, provided that the source and the author are acknowledged. Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalization Policies, Education and Citizenship, Edited by Dina Kiwan 96 Redefining Citizenship in Canada of Transnationalism
    5 Descent, Territory and Common Values: Redefining Citizenship in Canada Elke Winter Introduction1 Integrating the expression of ethnic diversity within the homogenizing logic of the nation state is a complex process. For many years, Canadian multicultural citizenship was portrayed as a role model for other coun- tries in this regard (Runnymede Trust: Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain, 2000; Kymlicka and Opalski, 2001). Recently, how- ever, earlier steps towards the liberalization and multiculturalization of immigrant integration policies have been abandoned in many coun- tries (Vertovec and Wessendorf, 2009). Several European states have introduced new citizenship tests that measure immigrants’ adequate skill of a national language, civic knowledge and value compatibility. Canada, too, has recently redressed the boundaries of its citizenship with respect to both legal status and identity. While, comparatively speaking, multiculturalism remains a staple of Canadian citizenship, ‘multicultiphobia’ (Ryan, 2010) – which had been superseded by fears of Québécois separatism in the second half of the 1990s (Winter, 2011) – has an increasing impact on what it means to be a Canadian citizen in the new century. This chapter traces changes in Canadian citizenship from the incep- Copyright material from www.palgraveconnect.com - licensed to University of Ottawa - PalgraveConnect - 2013-10-10 - PalgraveConnect of Ottawa - licensed to University www.palgraveconnect.com material from Copyright tion of the first Citizenship Act in 1947 until the present day. Its focus is two-fold. First, it places Canadian citizenship legislation in the context of the country’s complex ethnocultural heritage and compo- sition: its position as a British outpost in North America, its multi- national composition and – increasingly – its pioneering but highly ambivalent experimentation with renationalizing citizenship in the age 95 10.1057/9781137315519 - Naturalization Policies, Education and Citizenship, Edited by Dina Kiwan 96 Redefining Citizenship in Canada of transnationalism.
    [Show full text]