DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Requirements for Effective Deterrence of Interstate Aggression

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Requirements for Effective Deterrence of Interstate Aggression What Deters and Why Exploring Requirements for Effective Deterrence of Interstate Aggression Michael J. Mazarr, Arthur Chan, Alyssa Demus, Bryan Frederick, Alireza Nader, Stephanie Pezard, Julia A. Thompson, Elina Treyger C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2451 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0064-2 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Three ROK soldiers watching the border at Panmunjeom in the DMZ between North and South Korea/Henrik Ishihara via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0) Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project enti- tled What Deters and Why: Lessons of Deterrence Theory and Practice for U.S. Army Forces and Capabilities, sponsored by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, U.S. Army. The purpose of the project was to provide the U.S. Army with an analysis of fundamental deterrence theory and its potential applications to challenges of interstate aggression, including a specific case study of deterring Russian aggression in Europe. The Project Unique Identification Code (PUIC) for the project that produced this document is HQD177483. This research was conducted within RAND Arroyo Center’s Strategy, Doctrine, and Resources Program. RAND Arroyo Center, part of the RAND Corporation, is a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) sponsored by the U.S. Army. RAND operates under a “Federal-Wide Assurance” (FWA00003425) and com- plies with the Code of Federal Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects Under United States Law (45 CFR 46), also known as the Common Rule, as well as with the implementation guidance set forth in DoD Instruction 3216.02. As applicable, this compliance includes reviews and approvals by RAND’s Institutional Review Board (the Human Subjects Protection Committee) and by the U.S. Army. The views of sources utilized in this study are solely their own and do not represent the official policy or position of DoD or the U.S. Government. iii RR2451A_CC2015.indb 3 7/19/18 4:50 PM RR2451A_CC2015.indb 4 7/19/18 4:50 PM Contents Preface ................................................................................................. iii Figures .................................................................................................vii Tables .................................................................................................. ix Summary .............................................................................................. xi Acknowledgments ................................................................................. xvii Abbreviations ........................................................................................ xix CHAPTER ONE Understanding Deterrence and Dissuasion ...................................................... 1 Defining Deterrence and Dissuasion ................................................................ 2 A Comprehensive Approach to Preventing Aggression: Strategies of Dissuasion .............. 6 Key Distinctions ....................................................................................... 7 Intentions, Rationality, and Perception .............................................................10 The Choice to Initiate Aggression: Messy, Gradual, and Emergent .............................13 CHAPTER TWO Effective Deterrence and Dissuasion: A Framework for Analysis ..........................15 Challenges in Determining What Prevents Aggression ..........................................16 Category One: How Intensely Motivated Is the Aggressor? .....................................17 Category Two: Is the Defender Clear and Explicit Regarding What It Seeks to Prevent and What Actions It Will Take in Response? ...................................... 22 Category Three: Does the Potential Aggressor View the Defender’s Threats as Credible and Intimidating? .................................................................... 23 Summary and Proposed Framework for Deterrence Effectiveness ............................. 34 CHAPTER THREE Evaluating and Revising the Framework: Quantitative and Case Study Assessments ......................................................................................37 Quantitative Assessment of U.S. Extended Deterrence Cases Since 1945 .....................37 Qualitative Assessment: In-Depth Extended Deterrence Case Studies .........................39 A Revised Framework of Factors Associated with Deterrence Success .........................53 v RR2451A_CC2015.indb 5 7/19/18 4:50 PM vi What Deters and Why CHAPTER FOUR Applying the Revised Framework: Deterring Russia in the Baltic Region ...............55 How Motivated Is Russia? ...........................................................................57 How Clear and Explicit Is the U.S. Deterrent Message? .........................................63 Is the U.S. Deterrent Message Credible and Convincing? .......................................70 Conclusion .............................................................................................79 CHAPTER FIVE Conclusions, Recommendations, and Implications for the U.S. Army ................... 87 Recommendations ....................................................................................89 Implications for the U.S. Army ..................................................................... 92 APPENDIXES A. Quantitative Analysis: Cases of U.S. Extended Deterrence Since 1945 ...............93 B. Qualitative Case Study Analyses: Berlin .................................................. 109 C. Qualitative Case Study Analyses: Deterring Saddam, 1990 .......................... 131 D. Qualitative Case Study Analyses: NATO’s Northern Flank in the Cold War ..... 145 E. Qualitative Case Study Analyses: Russian Aggression Against Georgia............ 165 Bibliography ........................................................................................ 189 -1— 0— +1— RR2451A_CC2015.indb 6 7/19/18 4:50 PM Figures 1.1. Deterrence and Dissuasion .............................................................. 7 A.1. Regional Distribution of Deterrence Success in the Face of a Highly Motivated Aggressor ......................................................... 103 C.1. Timeline of Events in 1990 Leading Up to the Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait ....... 133 D.1. The GIUK Gap and the Strategic Situation of the Northern Flank ............. 147 D.2. U.S. Military Personnel Permanently Stationed in Northern Europe, 1950–1992 .............................................................................. 148 D.3. The Position of Kolsås and Murmansk Relative to Finnmark .................... 150 E.1. Map of Georgia ........................................................................ 166 vii RR2451A_CC2015.indb 7 7/19/18 4:50 PM RR2451A_CC2015.indb 8 7/19/18 4:50 PM Tables 2.1. Literature Review: Initial Set of Key Variables .......................................35 3.1. Key Variables ............................................................................ 54 4.1. Application of the Deterrence Framework to Russia in the Baltic States ........ 80 4.2. Recommendations for U.S. Deterrent Posture in the Baltics ...................... 84 5.1. Conclusions: Key Variables Governing the Success of Deterrence................ 88 A.1. All Cases ..................................................................................95 A.2. Cases of Failed Deterrence ............................................................. 96 A.3. Cases of Successful Deterrence ........................................................ 97 A.4. Deterrence Success in the Face of a Highly Motivated Aggressor ............... 100 A.5. Deterrence Success with Limited or Ambiguous Clarity ......................... 104 A.6. Deterrence Success Where There Was U.S. Disadvantage in the Local Balance of Forces ............................................................... 106 A.7. Quantitative Analysis: Confirmed Variables ....................................... 107 C.1. Application of the Framework to the Iraq Case .................................... 144 D.1. Application of the Framework to the Case of the United States Deterring the USSR .................................................................. 162 E.1. Application of the Framework
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sunshine in Korea
    CENTER FOR ASIA PACIFIC POLICY International Programs at RAND CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces. Sunshine in Korea The South Korean Debate over Policies Toward North Korea Norman D.
    [Show full text]
  • UPA : Redesigning Animation
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. UPA : redesigning animation Bottini, Cinzia 2016 Bottini, C. (2016). UPA : redesigning animation. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/69065 https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/69065 Downloaded on 05 Oct 2021 20:18:45 SGT UPA: REDESIGNING ANIMATION CINZIA BOTTINI SCHOOL OF ART, DESIGN AND MEDIA 2016 UPA: REDESIGNING ANIMATION CINZIA BOTTINI School of Art, Design and Media A thesis submitted to the Nanyang Technological University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 “Art does not reproduce the visible; rather, it makes visible.” Paul Klee, “Creative Credo” Acknowledgments When I started my doctoral studies, I could never have imagined what a formative learning experience it would be, both professionally and personally. I owe many people a debt of gratitude for all their help throughout this long journey. I deeply thank my supervisor, Professor Heitor Capuzzo; my cosupervisor, Giannalberto Bendazzi; and Professor Vibeke Sorensen, chair of the School of Art, Design and Media at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore for showing sincere compassion and offering unwavering moral support during a personally difficult stage of this Ph.D. I am also grateful for all their suggestions, critiques and observations that guided me in this research project, as well as their dedication and patience. My gratitude goes to Tee Bosustow, who graciously
    [Show full text]
  • Undermining the Global Nuclear Order? Impacts of Unilateral Negotiations Between the U.S. and North-Korea
    Undermining the global nuclear order? Impacts of unilateral negotiations between the U.S. and North-Korea Gordon Friedrichs, M.A. America first – America alone? Evangelische Akademie Hofgeismar Haus der Kirche, Kassel Dienstag, 27. November 2018 Gordon Friedrichs, M.A. Evangelische Akademie Hofgeismar 24.01.2019 Haus der Kirche, Kassel #1 Outline 1. History of U.S.-North Korea relations 2. The Nuclearization of North Korea 3. North Korea and challenges to U.S. global leadership 4. Discussion: Four options for conflict resolution Chanlett-Avery et al. 2018: 3 Gordon Friedrichs, M.A. Evangelische Akademie Hofgeismar 24.01.2019 Haus der Kirche, Kassel #2 History of U.S.-North Korea relations 1949-50: Communist insurrection on Jeju Island, Soviet & Chinese military support for the North; 1910 Japanese 1948/49: Kim Il-Sung Stalin’s support for military 1937: The battle depicted becomes chairman of the invasion. rule over NK 1950-53: Korean War. in the Grand Workers’ Party of Korea; Monument in Samjiyon, Democratic People’s Samjiyon County Republic of Korea (DPRK) 38th parallel established to divide North (SU, Communist) 1949: U.S. troop and South (US) Korea withdrawal; SK instability. 1953: The Korean Armistice 1945: End of World War II; Agreement that declared cease fire but no peace on the 38th parallel; Soviet victory over Japan on 1948: Republic of Korea was Korean Peninsula consolidation of power on both sides: founded under Syngman Rhee Juche ideology paired with Stalinism (authoritarian leader) in the North; autocratic military rule in the South. Gordon Friedrichs, M.A. Evangelische Akademie Hofgeismar 24.01.2019 Haus der Kirche, Kassel #3 Gordon Friedrichs, M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Gobble, Gobble, Gone
    SATURDAY, JANUARY 20, 2018 APPRECIATION $400K Remembering ‘Bozie’ buys a Swampscott’s Goldman leaves legacy of leadership By Daniel Kane A loving husband, father, and grandfather, lot of FOR THE ITEM Goldman was also a great mentor to many, including Michael H. Shanahan, Essex Media SWAMPSCOTT — Martin C. “Bozie” Gold- Group’s chairman and CEO. man will be remembered as having a lasting “His guidance on business, legal, and non- safety impact on the North Shore for his 91 years of pro t activities was a great help to me, but life. his example as a role model on the two most The Swampscott native practiced law for 61 important things in his life, family and com- By Thomas Grillo years, and was involved in the Temple Ema- munity, is his lasting legacy,” he said. “We are ITEM STAFF nu-El, the Jewish Community Center, and the all better off because of Martin Goldman. I’ll LYNN — Residents may Agganis Foundation. He also served as town miss him.” COURTESY PHOTO notice more police of cers moderator for more than two decades. Goldman constantly recruited different peo- riding in cruisers on the Martin C. “Bozie” Goldman “al- “He was a born leader,” said Jerry Somers, ple in town to take part in his many causes, city’s streets starting next ways wanted to give back to the past president of Temple Emanu-El. “He al- GOLDMAN, A7 week. community.” ways wanted to give back to the community.” The state granted Lynn $400,000 in Municipal Pub- lic Safety Staf ng Grant funding, enough to tempo- rarily restore overtime and MBTA deploy more police cars, ac- cording to Police Chief Mi- chael Mageary.
    [Show full text]
  • Fellow Submarines by Jan Joel Andersson
    32 2016 AL E X A ND E RZ E ML IA N ic H E NKO/AP/SIPA Fellow submarines by Jan Joel Andersson Ever since the occupation of Crimea in 2014, commercial, and military transport. Moreover, Russian military activity has increased in and the growing importance of secure maritime bor- around Europe. Russian air and land exercises have ders and the protection of vital undersea global also become more assertive and frequent compared communication cables make it both prudent and to previous years. Fighter jets of the Swedish and necessary for Europe to collectively manage, de- Finnish air forces, as well as NATO fighters pro- ter, and counter any undersea provocations. tecting the air space of the three Baltic republics of Countering enemy submarines is, however, very Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are scrambled on a difficult, time consuming and costly as the best regular basis to intercept approaching Russian air- underwater defences are submarines themselves. craft. Similarly, the Russian navy has stepped up its operations and engages in naval exercises and Complex and competitive deployments of increasing scope and scale. Containing more parts than jet airliners and be- Perhaps most worryingly to Western observers is ing more complicated than surface vessels, sub- the increase in underwater activity in the Baltic marines can be compared to space ships in their Sea and North Atlantic: senior NATO naval com- complexity. There are only a handful of companies manders have confirmed that “Russian submarine in the world capable of designing advanced sub- activity is reaching levels unseen since the end of marines and the majority of them are European.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit-Urgent Priorities
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED ING TH LOW E 20 OL 16 F W R A E R W S O A W P R I S U A M T M N I I T O J URGENT PRIORITIES PRIORITIES URGENT UR ES GENT PRIORITI JOINT AIR POWER FOLLOWING THE 2016 WARSAW SUMMIT URGENT PRIORITIES Joint Air Power Competence Centre JOINT AIR POWER NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit – Urgent Priorities An Allied Command Transformation Headquarters Study Conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit Urgent Priorities An Allied Command Transformation Headquarters Study Conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED © This work is copyrighted. No part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (SACT) HQ commis- sioned study conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC). All copyright and intellectual property rights reside with HQ ACT, unless otherwise licensed. The views expressed in this work do not necessarily represent the position of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), but are offered to foster dialogue and discussion re- garding urgent priorities in the field of air power capabilities and competencies. Though NATO classified documents may have informed the work of the authors, no clas- sified information has been directly quoted in this study, nor were any parts of classified information re-used in any form without prior sanitization.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato's Future: a Tale of Three Summits1 Hans Binnendijk, Senior Fellow, Center for Transatlantic Relations, Johns Hopkins University Sais November 2016 Summary
    NATO'S FUTURE: A TALE OF THREE SUMMITS1 HANS BINNENDIJK, SENIOR FELLOW, CENTER FOR TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS, JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SAIS NOVEMBER 2016 SUMMARY NATO tends to make progress on key policy issues and capability from summit to summit. Major shifts in the orientation of the Alliance can be traced to significant summits like London (1990), Washington (1999), Prague (2002), and Lisbon (2010). During the past two years, NATO has held a summit in Wales (4-5 September 2014) and one in Warsaw (8-9 July 2016). A third mini- summit is planned for Brussels in 2017. These first two summits taken together again significantly shifted the focus of the Alliance in the face of a series of new and dangerous challenges in the East and South. They shifted NATO’s posture in the East from benign neglect to allied reassurance to some degree of deterrence. The proposed force posture is inadequate to defeat a determined Russian short warning attack. Considerable increases in forward deployed forces (perhaps seven brigades) plus strengthened reinforcements would be necessary for NATO to hold its ground. But the Warsaw formula does provide what might be called “deterrence by assured response.” In the South, Allies recognized the complexity of the threats to Europe and sought to define NATO’s role in dealing with them. The third summit next year in Brussels could set the stage for further progress on both fronts. Much more still needs to be done. But with these fairly dramatic changes, NATO is in the process of once again restructuring itself so that it will not be “obsolete” in the effort to provide security for the transatlantic allies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion
    ABSTRACT Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A., M.A. Mentor: T. Michael Parrish, Ph.D. The trouble with “definitions” is they leave no room for evolution. When a word is concretely defined, it is done so in a particular time and place. Contextual interpretations permit a better understanding of certain heavy words; Atheism as a prime example. In the post-modern world Atheism has become more accepted and popular, especially as a reaction to global terrorism. However, the current definition of Atheism is terribly inaccurate. It cannot be stated properly that pagan Atheism is the same as New Atheism. By interpreting the Atheisms from four stages in the term‟s history a clearer picture of its meaning will come out, hopefully alleviating the stereotypical biases weighed upon it. In the interpretation of the Atheisms from Pagan Antiquity, the Enlightenment, the New Atheist Movement, and the American Judicial and Civil Religious system, a defense of the theory of elastic contextual interpretations, rather than concrete definitions, shall be made. Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion by Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Approved by the J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies ___________________________________ Robyn L. Driskell, Ph.D., Interim Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee ___________________________________ T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wesleyan Enlightenment
    The Wesleyan Enlightenment: Closing the gap between heart religion and reason in Eighteenth Century England by Timothy Wayne Holgerson B.M.E., Oral Roberts University, 1984 M.M.E., Wichita State University, 1986 M.A., Asbury Theological Seminary, 1999 M.A., Kansas State University, 2011 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Abstract John Wesley (1703-1791) was an Anglican priest who became the leader of Wesleyan Methodism, a renewal movement within the Church of England that began in the late 1730s. Although Wesley was not isolated from his enlightened age, historians of the Enlightenment and theologians of John Wesley have only recently begun to consider Wesley in the historical context of the Enlightenment. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex relationship between a man, John Wesley, and an intellectual movement, the Enlightenment. As a comparative history, this study will analyze the juxtaposition of two historiographies, Wesley studies and Enlightenment studies. Surprisingly, Wesley scholars did not study John Wesley as an important theologian until the mid-1960s. Moreover, because social historians in the 1970s began to explore the unique ways people experienced the Enlightenment in different local, regional and national contexts, the plausibility of an English Enlightenment emerged for the first time in the early 1980s. As a result, in the late 1980s, scholars began to integrate the study of John Wesley and the Enlightenment. In other words, historians and theologians began to consider Wesley as a serious thinker in the context of an English Enlightenment that was not hostile to Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Touro College & University System Faculty Publications
    TOURO COLLEGE & UNIVERSITY SYSTEM 2015 FACULTY PUBLICATIONS FACULTY 2015 & UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE TOURO TOURO COLLEGE & UNIVERSITY SYSTEM 2015 FACULTY PUBLICATIONS TOURO COLLEGE & TOURO COLLEGE & UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY SYSTEM SYSTEM Where Knowledge and Values Meet Where Knowledge and Values Meet TOURO COLLEGE & UNIVERSITY SYSTEM 2015 FACULTY PUBLICATIONS Compiled by the Touro College & University System Libraries touro.edu/library 2 TOURO FACULTY PUBLICATIONS 2015 Midtown Main Campus of Touro College 27-33 West 23rd Street, New York, NY 10010 he Touro College and University System is a Jewish-sponsored independent institution of higher and professional education serving the larger TAmerican community. Approximately 18,000 students are currently enrolled in its various schools and divisions. Touro College is accredited by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, phone number (267) 284-5000. The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is an institutional accrediting agency recognized by the United States Secretary of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. All Touro branches in California and Nevada are accredited by the Accrediting Commission, for Senior Colleges and Universities of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, 985 Atlantic Avenue, #100 Alameda, CA 94501, phone number (510) 748-9001. For more information on the Touro College & University System, please visit us on the web at: www.touro.edu or call (212) 463-0400. TOURO FACULTY PUBLICATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Vershbow
    EXCLUSIVE THE THREE SWORDS INTERVIEW "Everything we are doing has a 360-degree scope. We do not have the luxury of choosing between different challenges." ALEXANDER VERSHBOW Interview by Inci Kucukaksoy, JWC PAO and Peter Hutson, JWC CCI&E Branch AMBASSADOR ALEXANDER VERSHBOW served in U.S. Government and NATO appointments for almost four decades. In 2012, he became the first American to hold the position of NATO Deputy Secretary General — the Alliance's second most senior international civil servant — a post from which he retired on 17 October 2016, handing over to Ms Rose Gottemoeller of the United States. A long-time student of Russian Affairs and international relations, Ambassador Vershbow received a B.A. in Russian and East European Studies from Yale University and a Master's Degree in International Relations and Certificate of the Russian Institute from Columbia University. During his career, he has held a series of key assignments, including that of U.S. Ambassador to NATO from 1998 to 2001; "one of the most difficult periods on the international arena since the Cold War," Polish President Andrzej Duda said as he honoured Ambassador Vershbow with Poland's highest distinction of its kind, the Grand Cross of the Order of Merit of the Republic of Poland, at Warsaw's Belweder Palace, on the eve of the Warsaw Summit. The Three Swords magazine has quoted Ambassador Vershbow consistently in every issue since 2012 via NATO's online "Newsroom", where one can check out the full rundown of everything about our Alliance. In our fast-changing world it is important to document NATO's unique story; and, unbeknownst to Ambas- sador Vershbow, he has always inspired us in producing this magazine and charting a course; his opinion pieces rank among our most influential ones.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Draft DSCTC Report
    DEFENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE (DSC) Sub-Committee on Transatlantic Defence and Security Cooperation (DSCTC) EVOLVING SECURITY IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC Draft Report by Nicholas SOAMES (United Kingdom) Rapporteur 077 DSCTC 19 E | Original: English | 23 April 2019 Until this document has been adopted by the Defence and Security Committee, it only represents the views of the Rapporteur. 077 DSCTC 19 E TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 2 II. IMPORTANCE OF THE ATLANTIC ....................................................................................... 2 III. THE STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE OF THE GIUK-N GAP AND NEW RUSSIAN PRESENCE AND CAPABILITIES .............................................................................................................. 3 A. INCREASED RUSSIAN CAPABILITIES AND PRESENCE........................................... 3 B. RUSSIA IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC AND ARCTIC ..................................................... 4 C. THE NORTHERN FLEET AND RUSSIAN DEFENCE ARCHITECTURE IN THE ATLANTIC .................................................................................................................... 5 IV. NATO’S NORTH ATLANTIC PRESENCE AND NEW INITIATIVES ....................................... 5 A. NATO MARITIME COMMAND ...................................................................................... 6 B. ICELAND AND RENEWED NATO ANTI-SUBMARINE EFFORTS ............................... 7 V. INTERIM
    [Show full text]