DOCSLIB.ORG

Development and Wildlife Conservation: Oil Can They Co-Exist?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development and Wildlife Conservation: Oil Can They Co-Exist? NatureUganda Volume: 10.5 March, 2008 development and Wildlife Conservation: Oil can they co-exist? Block 5 Tower/Neptune IN THIS ISSUE: 100% (…Orca 50%?) Block 1 Heritage CONSERVATION 50% Tullow Block 2 50% Tullow 100% Block 3a • Oil development and Heritage 50% Tullow 50% wildlife conservation: Can Block 4 they co-exist? Dominion 100% • Collaborative forest management in Echuya forest landscape PROJECTS • Protected areas and Block 2 Tullow 100% poverty. Are the wealthier benefiting more than the poor people? number of oil and gas discoveries reserve, Otze-Dufile wildlife Ahave been made in the Albertine sanctuary and Mt. Kei Wildlife • Communities reap big Rift region. The region is reported Sanctuary. from mushroom growing to have a billion barrel potential and in Kabale 25 prospects are yet to be drilled. A Various companies including Tullow, number of exploration areas have so Dominion and Heritage oil are already far been identified and are located in involved in the exploration of oil NEWS areas of high conservation interests. and gas in the region. Tullow Oil has planned to start limited oil production • LVCEEP programme gets These include: by mid 2009. This is anticipated to bring more funding • Block EA 1 (Pakwach), with the following benefits to the country Murchison Falls National Park, ie. reduction in energy shortage, • New member of staff Bugungu Wildlife Reserve and increased employment opportunities, Karuma Wildlife Reserve. infrastructure development and save • ‘Football for • Block EA 2 (Northern Lake Albert), funds for oil and gas importation. conservation’ with Kabwoya Wildlife Reserve and among others. However, the major Kaiso-Tonya wildlife area. challenge now is the management of • My expedition on Ssese • Block EA 3 (Southern Albertine impacts of oil and gas exploration. waters Graben) with Semliki National Park These include operations/camps and Semliki wildlife reserve. footprint, habitat and species • Block EA 4 (Edward and George), disturbance and removal, ineffective UNUSUAL SIGHTINGS: with Queen Elizabeth National restoration and development of Park, Kyambura wildlife reserve and road infrastructure to accommodate • Handsome Francolin nest Kigezi Wildlife reserve. additional traffic. Others are workforce finally located • Block EA 5 (Rhino Camp) with Ajai influx, noise and light due to 24 Wildlife reserve, East Madi Wildlife hour operations, pollution resulting To be continued on page 3...................... LETTERS Chairman’s Massage NatureUganda AGM 2007 The 15th AGM of NatureUganda and the 88th of the East Africa Natural History Society (EANHS) took place on 7th of December 2007 at NatureUganda offices. The meeting was presided over by the Chairman Mr. Paul Mafabi, his fourth AGM as the Chairman of the organization. He presented a report to the members highlighting progress in implementing the strategic programme in 2007. He informed members that EANHS will be celebrating 100years of existence in 2009. NatureUganda and NatureKenya shall organize centenary celebrations. In his report, Mr Mafabi said that Uganda’s environment and the conservation scenario has been dramatic as evidenced by floods, declaration of the first Lucastrine reserve (CHOGM) on L. Victoria, invasion of national parks by pastoralists and investors, threats caused by palm oil plantations to forests and fossil oil/gas discovery in the Albertine Rift. Climate change has Dear members, also been at the centre of recent environment discussions. It is with great pleasure that I extend my greetings and appreciation for your continued support toNature Uganda. Despite the above challenges, NatureUganda has continued NatureUganda has achieved a lot in the previous year to score a number of successes in conservation, education because of its increased membership and commitment. This and awareness and membership growth. Specifically commitment was exhibited during the last Annual General the organization capacity assessment (OCA) conducted meeting which was successfully organised and attended. to review the status of NatureUganda has given our Thanks to the dedicated staff who make all programmes tick. organization a new orientation to critical development issues. A report on the economic evaluation of Mabira forest I congratulate the entire NatureUganda fraternity upon reserve contributed immensely to the discussion on the successful election of the new Executive committee (EC). Let proposed degazzettement of the forest. NU is now a legal me take this opportunity to congratulate members of the EC entity and can own property which was a stumbling block and also welcome the new members to the EC. to the acquisition of NatureUganda home. This is going to be a major focus for the new EC. At the AGM, members The New Year starts with new programmes for the welcomed representatives from the three branches in Gulu, membership. Please visit the secretariat to get a year Mbale and Mbarara and unanimously agreed that they planner and acquaint yourselves with membership activities should be ex-official members of the EC and shall be invited throughout the year. I encourage everyone to participate to all EC meetings. actively in the activities and recruitment of new members. You are also aware that NU has sic working groups and New projects were funded in 2007 including PEMA, IBA members are welcome to join any of them. monitoring, Cranes and Wetlands, Avian Flu Surveillance, with a total funding of over USD 1.5M. Membership NatureUganda has continued to gain support and increased by over 40% and this is predicted to be higher confidence from the donors, partners and allies both locally with new and diversified membership events such as nature and internationally. As a result funding for projects has walks, excursions and public talks. increased and conservation programmes have expanded. Audited accounts were presented by the Treasurer Mr. However this tremendous success is coupled with Robert Nabanyumya who also indicated that NU registered challenges such as service to the growing membership a surplus over expenditure. This is a good sign for our society whose expectations are justifiably high. Core funding, and a positive step towards sustainability. He reiterated conflict between conservation and development, climate the Chairman’s remark about the need to acquire a NU change, and environmental governance remain challenges home which would increase the corporate image of the to conservation of nature. organization but also reduce on the recurrent expenditure. NatureUganda has agreed on an aggressive plan to acquire The treasurer thanked donors, partners and the members its permanent home and I believe with your support, we for continued support. A full day conservation forum was shall be able to achieve our objectives. suggested by members to replace a one hour AGM so that members can hear of more details about NU programme I wish you a prosperous 2008 and partnerships. The secretariat expressed concern about funding for such a forum but members recommended that Paul Mafabi we should work towards this event. The next AGM is planned Chairman for 21st November 2008. The Naturalist CONSERVATION from flaring of gas, sludge residues, sustainable management of Protected Collaborative forest management in transportation in pipelines and tankers. areas in Uganda may mean that poverty Echuya forest landscape Biodiversity may be affected by camp in households adjacent to them could Since 2004, Echuya Forest Conservation wastes and spills which lead to heavy oil increase calling for closer coordination Project (EFCP) has been facilitating toxicity, ingestion and bioaccumulation with broader national strategies the Collaborative Forest Management and fish tainting. This will be in addition and international development (CFM) process between the National to general biodiversity loss due to approaches. Forestry Authority and Forest Adjacent clearance and loss of habitat. Although The survey results indicate that social Communities (FAC’s). As required by the EIA assessments have been conducted and economic inequities are apparent National Forest and Tree Planting Act fore areas under exploration, they have under all management regimes and 2003, focus has been on eight parishes been shallow on issues concerning that distributional impacts vary immediately adjacent to the reserve biodiversity impacts. between sites. While local people bear within four sub counties of Bufundi and During the monthly public talk significant costs, they also benefit from Muko in Kabale District,Kanaba and organised by NatureUganda, members protected areas (PAs) though generally Murora Sub counties in Kisoro District. were concerned about the lack of wealthier households’ benefit most sensitivity maps for the area, the from them in absolute terms; but This process though having taken lack of a general Albertine graben proportionally, more of the poorer sometime is already yielding important environmental assessment plan and households’ income is made up of PA outcomes. Communities and NFA staff the plan to degazette some areas to goods. In addition, poorer households are having good relations and working allow oil production. use more of their PA income for together in co-management of the subsistence purposes than wealthier reserve. Before CFM, Forest Adjacent Ms. Louise Johnson a consultant on oil households. National and International Communities used to look at the forest and Chief Biodiversity Advisor to the communities benefit more economically as a Government asset;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toro Semliki Wildlife Reserve GMP 2020-2029
    TORO-SEMLIKI WILDLIFE RESERVE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020/21 – 2029/30 A Growing Population of Uganda Kobs in the Reserve TSWR GMP 2020/21 - 2029/30 TORO-SEMLIKI WILDLIFE RESERVE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020/21 – 2029/30 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.........................................................................................................................................................................v FOREWORD..............................................................................................................................................................................................vi APPROVAL...............................................................................................................................................................................................vii ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................................................................viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................................................x PART 1: BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................................1.1 THE PLANNING PROCESS...................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Nationally Threatened Species for Uganda
    Nationally Threatened Species for Uganda National Red List for Uganda for the following Taxa: Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Butterflies, Dragonflies and Vascular Plants JANUARY 2016 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research team and authors of the Uganda Redlist comprised of Sarah Prinsloo, Dr AJ Plumptre and Sam Ayebare of the Wildlife Conservation Society, together with the taxonomic specialists Dr Robert Kityo, Dr Mathias Behangana, Dr Perpetra Akite, Hamlet Mugabe, and Ben Kirunda and Dr Viola Clausnitzer. The Uganda Redlist has been a collaboration beween many individuals and institutions and these have been detailed in the relevant sections, or within the three workshop reports attached in the annexes. We would like to thank all these contributors, especially the Government of Uganda through its officers from Ugandan Wildlife Authority and National Environment Management Authority who have assisted the process. The Wildlife Conservation Society would like to make a special acknowledgement of Tullow Uganda Oil Pty, who in the face of limited biodiversity knowledge in the country, and specifically in their area of operation in the Albertine Graben, agreed to fund the research and production of the Uganda Redlist and this report on the Nationally Threatened Species of Uganda. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE .......................................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Nature to Save It? an Analysis of Two Sport Hunting Policy Arrangements in Uganda
    Killing nature to save it? An analysis of two sport hunting policy arrangements in Uganda Amos Ochieng Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr V.R. van der Duim Personal Chair at the Cultural Geography Group Wageningen University & Research Co-promotor Dr I.J. Visseren-Hamakers Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Science and Policy George Mason University, Virginia, USA Other members Prof. Dr D. Vanneste, University of Leuven, Belgium Dr M. Ros-Tonen, University of Amsterdam Prof. Dr H. van Dijk, Wageningen University & Research Dr M. Lamers, Wageningen University & Research This research was conducted under the auspices of the Wageningen Graduate School of Social Sciences ii Killing nature to save it? An analysis of two sport hunting policy arrangements in Uganda Amos Ochieng Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr A.P.J. Mol in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 19 February 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in the Aula. Amos Ochieng Killing nature to save it? An analysis of two sport hunting policy arrangements in Uganda 164 pages PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2019) With references, with summaries in English, and Dutch ISBN: 978-94-6343-565-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18174/466995 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The completion of this PhD would not have been possible without the tireless contributions of the people I will recognize below. First and foremost, I sincerely thank Wageningen University and Research for awarding me a scholarship to pursue this PhD study.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Population Sizes of Lions Panthera Leo and Spotted Hyaenas Crocuta Crocuta in Uganda’S Savannah Parks, Using Lure Count Methods
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository Estimating population sizes of lions Panthera leo and spotted hyaenas Crocuta crocuta in Uganda’s savannah parks, using lure count methods E DWARD O KOT O MOYA,TUTILO M UDUMBA,STEPHEN T. BUCKLAND,PAUL M ULONDO and A NDREW J. PLUMPTRE Abstract Despite .60 years of conservation in Uganda’s but the medium-to-large ungulates of open country that national parks the populations of lions and spotted hyaenas constitute the major prey of lions are usually estimated with in these areas have never been estimated using a census reasonable accuracy (Schaller, 1972; Hunter, 1998; Hayward method. Estimates for some sites have been extrapolated to & Kerley, 2005), making prey counts an attractive option. other protected areas and educated guesses have been made Developing consistent and reliable methods for estimating but there has been nothing more definitive. We used a lure population density is pivotal for many studies in animal count analysis method of call-up counts to estimate popu- ecology as well as for efficient population assessment and lations of the lion Panthera leo and spotted hyaena Crocuta allocation of conservation effort (Dacier et al., 2011). crocuta in the parks where reasonable numbers of these Survey methods developed to estimate the population species exist: Queen Elizabeth Protected Area, Murchison density of African lions include roar counts, individual iden- Falls Conservation Area and Kidepo Valley National Park. tification, and mark–recapture methods (Ogutu & Dublin, We estimated a total of 408 lions and 324 hyaenas for these 1998; IUCN, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment (Sea) of Oil and Gas Activities
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SEA) OF OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES IN THE ALBERTINE GRABEN , UGANDA FINAL REPORT The SEA Team Kampala, June 2013 Copyright © MEMD 2013 All rights reserved. The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, Petroleum Exploration and Production Department (PEPD), in conjuction with the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) initiated and funded the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of the oil and gas activities in the Albertine Graben of Uganda, with support from Oil for Development (OFD) Program a bilateral agreement between Government of Uganda and Norway under the project, “Strengthening the management of Oil and Gas Sector in Uganda”. On behalf of the SEA Team: Bjørn Kristoffersen (SEA Team Leader) Eco-Management Support 4306 Sandnes, Norway [email protected] Jane Bemigisha ESIPPS International Ltd. Plot 7/9 Clement Hill Road, Hill View Apartments, P.O. Box, 33011, Kampala, Uganda Email: [email protected] ; Web: www.esipps-int.org Disclaimer The SEA report has been prepared and delivered by a team of consultants, the SEA Team under the guidance of the SEA Steering Committee. The content of the report reflects the professional judgement and advice of the SEA Team. Page i FOREWORD The discovery of oil and gas resources presents great socio-economic prospects for the Albertine Graben and the country at large, but the area is of high ecological and biodiversity significance. This presents various challenges for environmental protection. This document presents a report on Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA) of oil and gas activities in the Albertine Graben of Uganda. The SEA document presents strategic recommendations for policies, plans, and programmes that will guide environmental planning and decision making in the Albertine Graben.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Days Pearls of Uganda MID RANGE Safari
    www.manyaafricatours.com 12 Day Pearls of Uganda Mid-range Safari Highlights of this Tour • The idyllic town of Entebbe on Lake Victoria • In touch with the gorillas, the kings of the jungle • The spectacular Murchison Falls on the Victoria Nile • Exotic animals like the cow antelope, the Uganda Kob and the bushbuck • The search for the shoebill • Exciting water safari • On the trail of tree-climbing lions and Uganda Carnivore program • Chimpanzee tracking in the jungle There is so much to experience on this exciting journey through Uganda. Get very close and personal with the endangered gorillas and get an insight by the conservationists. You will join Dr Ludwig Seifert and his team of the Uganda carnivore Project and get very close to the lions in their natural habitat. With a little luck, you may even see some tree-climbing lions. While you enjoy the scenery and in various national parks on the way, you can admire the whole diversity of Uganda. Not only exceptional animals such as hartebeest and patas monkeys can be found in the national parks, but also hippos and chimpanzees. Enjoy an exciting water safari and get in touch with the local people in many small villages like Buhoma. You will even have the opportunity to meet real native people like the Batwa tribe on your journey. This trip to Uganda offers Manya Africa Tours | www.manyaafricatours.com | [email protected] Tel +256 (0)775 554791 / +256 (0)777 195894 Plot 3, Lubobo Close, Muyenga, Kampala, Uganda Member of AUTO Association of Uganda Tour Operators, ATTA African Travel & Tourism Association www.manyaafricatours.com 12 Day Pearls of Uganda Mid-range Safari unforgettable experiences in the wild and allows a whole new look at the culture of this unique country in East Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • RED LIST of THREATENED SPECIES in UGANDA Availability This Publication Is Available in Hardcopy from MTWA
    © 2018 RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES IN UGANDA Availability This publication is available in hardcopy from MTWA. A fee may be charged for persons or institutions that may wish to obtain hard copies. It can also be downloaded from the MTWA website: www.tourism.go.ug Copies are available for reference at the following libraries: MTWA Library Public Libraries Suggested citation MTWA (2018). Red List of Threatened Species of Uganda 2018, Ministry of Wildlife, Tourism and Antiquities (MTWA) Kampala. Copyright © 2018 MTWA MINISTRY OF WILDLIFE, TOURISM AND ANTIQUITIES P.O. Box 4241 Kampala, Uganda www.tourism.go.ug [email protected] © RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES IN UGANDA 2018 Ministry of Wildlife, Tourism and Antiquities Foreword Uganda is a signatory to several international conventions that relate to the conservation of all biodiversity in the country such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species and Cartagena protocol all intended for the benefit local communities and global community. Species are disappearing due to various pressures on natural resources. Due to human population increasing trends and development pressures, previously intact habitats both protected and on private land have been converted, cleared and/or degraded leading to a decline in species population and diversity. The effects of climate change, which are hard to forecast in terms of pace and pattern, will probably also accelerate extinctions in unknown ways. Studies have been conducted to tally the number of species of animals, plants and fungi that still exist globally. However the estimates normally produced are based on the International Union of Conservation of Nature criterion that at times overshadows the national scales.
    [Show full text]
  • The Overlap Between Conservation and Development Organisations in the Albertine Rift, Western Uganda
    The Overlap between Conservation and Development Organisations in the Albertine Rift, Western Uganda Photo: Terry Sunderland, Uganda, 2010 By Harriet Smith April 2012 PCLG Discussion Paper No 07 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 The Albertine Rift ...................................................................................................................... 2 Poverty in the Albertine Rift ................................................................................................... 4 Conservation in the Albertine Rift .......................................................................................... 5 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 8 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Mapping organisations activities ......................................................................................... 17 Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 18 References ............................................................................................................................... 19 Introduction The extent to which biodiversity conservation does, or indeed should, contribute towards poverty alleviation
    [Show full text]
  • Uwa Annual Corporate Report 2019
    CORPORATE REPORT 2019 Conserving for Generations CORPORATE REPORT 2019 Published by : Uganda Wildlife Authority 7 Kira Road Kamwokya P.O.Box, Kampala Uganda Tel: +256 414 355 000 Fax: +256 414 546 291 Email: [email protected] www.ugandawildlife.org ugandawildlifeauthority ugandawildlife © 2019 Uganda Wildlife Authority Table Of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS I WORD FROM THE CHAIRMAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES II STATEMENT FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR III UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY 8TH BOARD OF TRUSTEE IV UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY TOP MANAGEMENT V 01 RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT 1 02 ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RESEARCH 11 03 COMMUNITY CONSERVATION 14 04 TOURISM DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY 24 05 CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT 31 06 GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE AFFAIRS 35 07 REVENUE PERFORMANCE 44 CHALLENGES 46 Abbreviations and Acronyms AUTO Association Of Uganda Tour Operators WCS Wildlife Conservation Society AWF African Wildlife Fund WR Wildlife Reserve BINP Bwindi Impenetrable National Park WUR Wildlife Use Rights BMCA Bwindi Mgahinga Conservation Area CTPH Conservation through Public Health CA Conservation Area IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature CC Community Conservation ICGP International Gorilla Conservation Programme CEDP Competiveness and Enterprise Development Project ITFC Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation CPF Central Processing Facility BMCT Bwindi Mgahinga Conservation Trust CWA Community Wildlife Association UPDF Uganda Peoples’ Defence Force CWS Community Wildlife Scouts NRCN Natural Resources Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Implementation Status & Results Report Uganda Investing in Forests and Protected Areas for Climate-Smart Development Project (P170466) Uganda Investing in Forests and Protected Areas for Climate-Smart Development Project (P170466) AFRICA EAST | Uganda | Environment, Natural Resources & the Blue Economy Global Practice | IBRD/IDA | Investment Project Financing | FY 2020 | Seq No: 2 | ARCHIVED on 20-Jan-2021 | ISR45241 | Public Disclosure Authorized Implementing Agencies: Ministry of Water and Environment, Republic of Uganda, Uganda Wildlife Authority, National Forestry Authority Key Dates Key Project Dates Bank Approval Date: 23-Apr-2020 Effectiveness Date: -- Planned Mid Term Review Date: -- Actual Mid-Term Review Date: Original Closing Date: 30-Jun-2026 Revised Closing Date: 30-Jun-2026 pdoTable Project Development Objectives Public Disclosure Authorized Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) To improve sustainable management of forests and protected areas and increase benefits to communities from forests in target landscapes Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project Objective? No Components Table Name Component 1. Improved Management of Protected Areas:(Cost $46.70 M) Component 2. Increased Revenues and Jobs from Forests and Wildlife Protected Areas:(Cost $38.50 M) Component 3. Improved Landscape Management in Refugee Hosting Areas:(Cost $58.00 M) Component 4. Project Management and Monitoring:(Cost $5.00 M) Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Ratings Name Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Risk Rating Substantial Substantial Implementation Status and Key Decisions The Uganda Investing in Forests and Protected Areas Project was approved by the World Bank Board on April 23, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Development and Biodiversity Conservation in the Protected Areas of the Albertine Graben in Uganda: Can They Co-Exist?
    PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN THE PROTECTED AREAS OF THE ALBERTINE GRABEN IN UGANDA: CAN THEY CO-EXIST? A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2013 Isaiah Owiunji Planning and Environmental Management School of Environment and Development (SED) 1 Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ 9 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... 10 List of Pictures ......................................................................................................................... 11 List of boxes ............................................................................................................................ 11 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 12 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. 13 Declaration .............................................................................................................................. 14 Copyright Statement ............................................................................................................... 14 List of Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mj the ' Gj Uganda Gazette I
    269 Mj The ' gj TietHFBLK.rCGAXUA UGANDA R'gist'rrd at the Uganda"WT" "T" IB GazetteA A Publishedi Vol. XCVI No. 41 5th September, 2003 Price: Shs. 1000 CONTENTS Page No. 55—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife fhe Companies Act—Notice........................ 270 Conservation Area) (Karenga Community Wildlife Area) The Trade Marks Act— Registration of applications 270-275 Instrument. 2003. Advertisements ....................................... 275-276 SUPPLEMENTS No. 56—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife Conservation Area) (Amudat Community Wildlife Statutory Instruments Area) Instrument, 2003. No. 41—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife Conservation Area) (Queen Elizabeth National Park) No. 57—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife Instrument, 2003. Conservation Area) (Rwengara Community Wildlife No. 42—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife Area) Instrument, 2003. Conservation Area) (Mount Elgon National Park) Instrument, 2003. No. 58—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife Conservation Area) (Kaiso-Tonya Community Wildlife No. 43—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife Area) Instrument, 2003. Conservation Area) (Bwindi Impenetrable National Park) Instrument, 2003. No. 59—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife No. 44—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife Conservation Area) (Kashaka Wildlife Sanctuary) Conservation Area) (Lake Mburo National Park) Instrument, 2003. Instrument, 2003. No. 60—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife No. 45—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife Conservation Area) (Kisenyi Wildlife Sanctuary) Conservation Area) (Mgahinga Gorilla National Park) Instrument, 2003. Instrument, 2003. No. 61—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife No. 46—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife Conservation Area) (Kahendero Wildlife Sanctuary) Conservation Area) (Kibale National Park) Instrument. Instrument, 2003. 2003. No. 47—The Uganda Wildlife (Declaration of Wildlife No.
    [Show full text]