DOCSLIB.ORG

RED LIST of THREATENED SPECIES in UGANDA Availability This Publication Is Available in Hardcopy from MTWA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RED LIST of THREATENED SPECIES in UGANDA Availability This Publication Is Available in Hardcopy from MTWA © 2018 RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES IN UGANDA Availability This publication is available in hardcopy from MTWA. A fee may be charged for persons or institutions that may wish to obtain hard copies. It can also be downloaded from the MTWA website: www.tourism.go.ug Copies are available for reference at the following libraries: MTWA Library Public Libraries Suggested citation MTWA (2018). Red List of Threatened Species of Uganda 2018, Ministry of Wildlife, Tourism and Antiquities (MTWA) Kampala. Copyright © 2018 MTWA MINISTRY OF WILDLIFE, TOURISM AND ANTIQUITIES P.O. Box 4241 Kampala, Uganda www.tourism.go.ug [email protected] © RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES IN UGANDA 2018 Ministry of Wildlife, Tourism and Antiquities Foreword Uganda is a signatory to several international conventions that relate to the conservation of all biodiversity in the country such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species and Cartagena protocol all intended for the benefit local communities and global community. Species are disappearing due to various pressures on natural resources. Due to human population increasing trends and development pressures, previously intact habitats both protected and on private land have been converted, cleared and/or degraded leading to a decline in species population and diversity. The effects of climate change, which are hard to forecast in terms of pace and pattern, will probably also accelerate extinctions in unknown ways. Studies have been conducted to tally the number of species of animals, plants and fungi that still exist globally. However the estimates normally produced are based on the International Union of Conservation of Nature criterion that at times overshadows the national scales. Based on studies that have been carried out in Uganda, list of nationally threatened species for Uganda in the seven taxa namely mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, butterflies, dragonflies and vascular plants have been developed. This will contribute significantly towards our undersatnding of the status of the species relevant to Ugandan context culturaly and economicaly as well as a reference for policy formulation and strategic decision making in Uganda. Iam very grateful for the support of Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Ltd and Wildlife Conservation Society together with government agencies and Non Governmental Organisations that partcipated in the process of coming up with this much appreciated list of nationally threatened species for Uganda. i Prof. Emphraim Kamuntu (MP), Minister for the Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities Acknowledgements This first Red List of threatened species for Uganda is the result of significant efforts to survey and understand the country’s resident biodiversity by many institutions and individuals over a number of years, to all of whom we are sincerely grateful. All sources of data used have been acknowledged and referenced, but particular thanks are due to the specialists of Uganda Wildlife Authority, Makerere University (College of Agricultural and Environmental Science and College of Natural Sciences), Tullow Uganda Operations Pty, the Wildlife Conservation Society, the Senckenburg Museum of Natural History (Germany), who not only provided the majority of data used in the compilation of the Red List but also their time and expertise to participate in the taxonomic group meetings to analyse every species. To their exhaustive efforts to ensure the best possible information was used for each of the species included we are indebted. Special thanks are also due to Tullow Uganda Operation Pty and the Petroleum Exploration and Production Department (PEPD) of the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (MEMD), whose efforts to understand the biodiversity of the Albertine Graben prior to the commencement of oil development were responsible for initiating this project and who have graciously funded the production of this first Red List; to the National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) and Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), whose encouragement and enthusiasm for this project are greatly appreciated and lastly; to The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) who are responsible for coordinating the global Red List of threatened species and to the individual Specialist Species Groups (SSG) within the IUCN umbrella who have provided input and guidance on the process and taxonomic groups. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword i Acknowledgements ii List of acronyms iv Technical Team (authors and reviewers) v Institutions that contributed data vi Executive summary vii PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Background 1 Purpose of the Red List 2 Methodology for developing the Red List 3 Terminology 3 National Threat Status 4 Sites 4 iii PART 2: THE RED LISTS 6 National Red Lists Tables for Different Taxa 7 Mammals 7 Birds 19 Amphibians 32 Reptiles 39 Butterflies 48 Dragonflies 75 Vascular Plants 80 Summary of results 97 REFERENCES 98 List of acronyms DRC Democratic Republic of Congo IFC International Finance Corporation IUCN International Union for the Conservation of Nature MTWA Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities NEMA National Environment Management Authority of Uganda NaFIRRI National Fisheries Resources Research Institute NFA National Forest Authority NU Nature Uganda PEPD Petroleum Exploration and Production Department TUOP Tullow Uganda Operations Limited UWA Uganda Wildlife Authority WCS Wildlife Conservation Society iv Technical Team (authors and reviewers) Mammals Dr Robert Kityo Makerere University College of Natural Sciences Mr Tutillo Mudumba Wildlife Conservation Society Professor Julian Peterhans Kerbis Roosevelt University of Chicago Mr Aggrey Rwetsiba Uganda Wildlife Authority Birds Hamlet Mugabe Wildlife Conservation Society Professor Derek Pomeroy Nature Uganda Achilles Byaruhanga Nature Uganda Mr Roger Skeen Nature Uganda Mr Richard Ssemmanda Independent Consultant Amphibians and reptiles Dr Mathias Behangana Makerere University College of Natural Sciences v Dr Michelle Menegon Museum of Science of Trento, Italy Robert Sekisambu Wildlife Conservation Society Dr Eli Greenbaum University of Texas Dr Thomas Doherty-Bone University of Leeds Dr David c. Blackburn University of Florida Ms Elena Garollo Museum of Science of Trento, Italy Butterflies and Dragonflies Dr Perpetra Akite Makerere University College of Natural Sciences Dr Viola Clausnitzer Senckenburg Museum of Natural History, Germany Dr Klaas-Douwe Dijkstra Naturalis Biodiversity Centre, Leiden, Netherlands Plants Mr Ben Kirunda Wildlife Conservation Society Dr Simon Nampindo Wildlife Conservation Society Dr Miguel Leal Wildllife Conservation Society Mr Tom Forrest Independent Researcher (Aloes and Sansevieras) Ms Christine Kabuye Makerere University College of Natural Sciences Mr David Nkuutu Independent Consultant Dr Margaret Namaganda Makerere University College of Natural Sciences Technical Coordinators: Ms. Sarah Prinsloo Wildlife Conservation Society Dr. Andrew Plumptre Wildlife Conservation Society Mr Sam Ayebare Wildlife Conservation Society Red List Publication Committee: Mr Geoffrey Mwedde Wildlife Conservation Society Mr Aggrey Rwetsiba Uganda Wildlife Authority Ms. Caroline Aguti Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development Ms. Evelyn Lutalo National Environment Management Authority Mr Innocent Akampurira Uganda National Council of Science and Technology Design and layout: Mr. Musiime P. Muramura Uganda Wildlife Authority Cover Photos Front: Shoebill in Mabamba Swamp by Musiime P. Muramura vi Back cover: Elephant in Murchison Falls National Park by Musiime P. Muramura Institutions that contributed data Wildlife Conservation Society National Biodiversity Databank, Makerere University Makerere University Institute of Environment and Natural Resources National Fisheries Resources Research institute Uganda Wildlife Authority National Forestry Authority Tullow Uganda Operations Pty Senckenburg Museum of Natural History, Germany Executive summary Natural systems and species in Uganda are facing unprecedented pressure from industrial development as well as from rural human populations striving to make a living. Whereas this fact is well known and documented, little or no effort has been put in place to evaluate the trends and threat levels of individual species populations to inform policy actions. Yet, existence of such information plays a key role in influencing different forms of development and the necessary remedial or corrective action to take besides providing an accountability mechanism for companies who are committed to meeting international standards like the Environmental and Social Performance Standards of the International Finance Corporation. This evaluation was done to offer a quick internationally recognised guide to the threat status of species in Uganda and intended for use by the Government of Uganda, Environmental professionals, developers, conservation organisations and the academia. Using IUCN Red Listing guidelines, a team of experts evaluated the threat status of seven taxa including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, butterflies, dragonflies and vascular plants. These were taxa for which reasonable distribution data were available. The evaluated species are listed by taxa in tables which give the species (Latin) names, common names, the global threat status, the national threat status of the species as well as sites where these are found for easy reference. The total numbers of species per taxa found to be nationally
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Factors Influencing Odonata Communities of Three Mediterranean Rivers: Kebir-East, Seybouse, and Rhumel Wadis, Northeastern Algeria
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by I-Revues Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie), Vol. 72 (3), 2017 : 314-329 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS INFLUENCING ODONATA COMMUNITIES OF THREE MEDITERRANEAN RIVERS: KEBIR-EAST, SEYBOUSE, AND RHUMEL WADIS, NORTHEASTERN ALGERIA 1,2 1,2,3 Amina YALLES SATHA & Boudjéma SAMRAOUI 1 Laboratoire de Conservation des Zones Humides, University of Guelma, Guelma, Algeria. E-mails: [email protected] & [email protected] 2 University of 08 mai 1945, Guelma, Algeria 3 Biology Department, University of Annaba, Annaba, Algeria RÉSUMÉ.— Facteurs environnementaux influençant les communautés d’Odonates de trois rivières méditerranéennes : les oueds Kebir-Est, Seybouse et Rumel, nord-est algérien.— Les Odonates sont une composante importante des peuplements des milieux lotiques et leur abondance et diversité renseignent sur l’intégrité écologique de ces hydrosystèmes. L’inventaire odonatologique de trois oueds majeurs algériens : Kebir- Est, Seybouse et Rhumel, a permis l’identification de 40 espèces. Nos résultats révèlent la présence de Calopteryx exul, endémique maghrébin, dans l’oued Seybouse et semblent confirmer l’extinction de la population type dans l’oued Rhumel où l’espèce avait été découverte au XIXe siècle. Nos résultats indiquent également l’expansion de plusieurs espèces: Coenagrion caerulescens, Orthetrum nitidinerve, Trithemis kirbyi et Urothemis edwardsii dont la population relictuelle est en danger critique d’extinction. La mesure de diverses variables physicochimiques (altitude, température, conductivité, etc.) nous a permis d’explorer une possible co-structure entre les jeux de données faunistiques et de variables environnementales. L’analyse des données indique que la richesse spécifique est, selon l’oued, variablement correlée à l’hydropériode, à la conductivité et à la température de l’eau, suggérant son utilité dans l’évaluation de l’intégrité écologique des cours d’eau méditerranéens.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of Equatorial African Lacertidae, with the Description of a New Genus and Species from Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 163, 913–942. With 7 figures A molecular phylogeny of Equatorial African Lacertidae, with the description of a new genus and species from eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo ELI GREENBAUM1*, CESAR O. VILLANUEVA1, CHIFUNDERA KUSAMBA2, MWENEBATU M. ARISTOTE3 and WILLIAM R. BRANCH4,5 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USA 2Laboratoire d’Herpétologie, Département de Biologie, Centre de Recherche en Sciences Naturelles, Lwiro, République Démocratique du Congo 3Institut Superieur d’Ecologie pour la Conservation de la Nature, Katana Campus, Sud Kivu, République Démocratique du Congo 4Bayworld, P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, South Africa 5Research Associate, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa Received 25 July 2010; revised 21 November 2010; accepted for publication 18 January 2011 Currently, four species of the lacertid lizard genus Adolfus are known from Central and East Africa. We sequenced up to 2825 bp of two mitochondrial [16S and cytochrome b (cyt b)] and two nuclear [(c-mos (oocyte maturation factor) and RAG1 (recombination activating gene 1)] genes from 41 samples of Adolfus (representing every species), two species each of Gastropholis and Holaspis, and in separate analyses combined these data with GenBank sequences of all other Eremiadini genera and four Lacertini outgroups. Data from DNA sequences were analysed with maximum parsimony (PAUP), maximum-likelihood (RAxML) and Bayesian inference (MrBayes) criteria. Results demonstrated that Adolfus is not monophyletic: Adolfus africanus (type species), Adolfus alleni, and Adolfus jacksoni are sister taxa, whereas Adolfus vauereselli and a new species from the Itombwe Plateau of Democratic Republic of the Congo are in a separate lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    Mozambique: Species List Birds Specie Seen Location Common Quail Harlequin Quail Blue Quail Helmeted Guineafowl Crested Guineafowl Fulvous Whistling-Duck White-faced Whistling-Duck White-backed Duck Egyptian Goose Spur-winged Goose Comb Duck African Pygmy-Goose Cape Teal African Black Duck Yellow-billed Duck Cape Shoveler Red-billed Duck Northern Pintail Hottentot Teal Southern Pochard Small Buttonquail Black-rumped Buttonquail Scaly-throated Honeyguide Greater Honeyguide Lesser Honeyguide Pallid Honeyguide Green-backed Honeyguide Wahlberg's Honeyguide Rufous-necked Wryneck Bennett's Woodpecker Reichenow's Woodpecker Golden-tailed Woodpecker Green-backed Woodpecker Cardinal Woodpecker Stierling's Woodpecker Bearded Woodpecker Olive Woodpecker White-eared Barbet Whyte's Barbet Green Barbet Green Tinkerbird Yellow-rumped Tinkerbird Yellow-fronted Tinkerbird Red-fronted Tinkerbird Pied Barbet Black-collared Barbet Brown-breasted Barbet Crested Barbet Red-billed Hornbill Southern Yellow-billed Hornbill Crowned Hornbill African Grey Hornbill Pale-billed Hornbill Trumpeter Hornbill Silvery-cheeked Hornbill Southern Ground-Hornbill Eurasian Hoopoe African Hoopoe Green Woodhoopoe Violet Woodhoopoe Common Scimitar-bill Narina Trogon Bar-tailed Trogon European Roller Lilac-breasted Roller Racket-tailed Roller Rufous-crowned Roller Broad-billed Roller Half-collared Kingfisher Malachite Kingfisher African Pygmy-Kingfisher Grey-headed Kingfisher Woodland Kingfisher Mangrove Kingfisher Brown-hooded Kingfisher Striped Kingfisher Giant Kingfisher Pied
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Chinn Environmental Training, Inc. Info
    Scientific Name Common Name Region 6 Habit Scientific Name Common Name Region 6 Habit Abies balsamea FIR,BALSAM FACW NT Amaranthus californicus AMARANTH,CALIFORNIA NI ANF Abutilon theophrasti VELVET-LEAF NI AIF Amaranthus crassipes AMARANTH,TROPICAL FAC+ AIF Acacia greggii ACACIA,CATCLAW UPL NST Amaranthus greggii AMARANTH,GREGGIS FAC ANF Acacia smallii HUISACHE FACU NTS Amaranthus obcordatus AMARANTH,TRANS PECOS NI ANF Acalypha rhomboidea COPPER-LEAF,COMMON UPL* ANF Amaranthus palmeri AMARANTH,PALMER'S FACU- ANF Acalypha virginica MERCURY,THREE-SEEDED UPL* ANF Amaranthus retroflexus AMARANTH,RED-ROOT FACU- ANF Acer negundo BOX-ELDER FACW- NT Amaranthus rudis AMARANTH,TALL FAC ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,DRUMMOND RED FACW NT Amaranthus spinosus AMARANTH,SPINY FACU- ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,TRIDENT RED NI NT Amaranthus tuberculatus AMARANTH,ROUGH-FRUIT NI ANF Acer rubrum MAPLE,RED FAC NT Ambrosia artemisiifolia RAGWEED,ANNUAL FACU- ANF Acer saccharinum MAPLE,SILVER FAC NT Ambrosia grayi BURSAGE,WOOLLY-LEAF FACW PNF Acer saccharum MAPLE,SUGAR UPL NT Ambrosia psilostachya RAGWEED,NAKED-SPIKE FAC- PNF Achillea millefolium YARROW,COMMON FACU PNF Ambrosia trifida RAGWEED,GREAT FAC ANF Acorus calamus SWEETFLAG OBL PIEF Amelanchier alnifolia SERVICE-BERRY,SASKATOON FAC- NS Adiantum capillus-veneris FERN,SOUTHERN MAIDEN-HAIR FACW+ PNF3 Amelanchier arborea SERVICE-BERRY,DOWNY FACU NT Adiantum pedatum FERN,NORTHERN MAIDEN-HAIR FAC PNF3 Amianthium muscaetoxicum FLYPOISON FAC PNF Adiantum tricholepis FERN,HAIRY MAIDEN-HAIR FAC PNF3 Ammannia auriculata AMMANNIA,RED-STEM
    [Show full text]
  • 29 Figure8. the Limited Rank Hydrophilic Sedge and Grass Patches Within the Central Valley Bottom Wetland Provide Suitable Roost
    Figure8. The limited rank hydrophilic sedge and grass patches within the central valley bottom wetland provide suitable roosting and foraging habitat for African Grass Owls. The high levels of human disturbances on the site including hunting with dogs; severely restricts the likelihood of any nests and limits potential roosting suitability. The annual burning of the site restricts the vegetative cover along the valley bottom wetland. Off-road bikes, quads and vehicle tracks transverse the entire site as well as helicopter training and landing on the site and open areas to the south of the site adjacent to the Waterval cemetery. African Grass Owls are found exclusively in rank grass, typically, although not only, at fair altitudes. Grass Owls are secretive and nomadic breeding in permanent and seasonal vleis, which it vacates while hunting or post-breeding, although it will breed in any area of long grass and it is not necessarily associated with wetlands. It marshlands it is usually outnumbered by the more common Marsh Owl (Asio capensis) 10:1 (Tarboton et al. 1987). Grass Owls nest on the ground within a system of tunnels constructed in mostly tall grass; peak-breeding activity (February- April) tends to coincide with maximum grass cover (Steyn 1982). Grass Owls specialise in large rodent prey, particularly Otomys vlei rats, although a wide range of rodent prey species, including Rhabdomys, Praomys, Mus, and Suncus, are taken (Earle 1978). Some local and nomadic movements in response to fluctuating food supplies, fire and the availability of suitable habitat can be expected (Steyn 1982). The ecological requirements of this species make it susceptible to many land-use changes impacting contemporary South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Lorem Ipsum Dolor Sit Amet, Consectetur Adipiscing Elit
    Volume 26: 102–108 METAMORPHOSIS www.metamorphosis.org.za ISSN 1018–6490 (PRINT) LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA ISSN 2307–5031 (ONLINE) Classification of the Afrotropical butterflies to generic level Published online: 25 December 2015 Mark C. Williams 183 van der Merwe Street, Rietondale, Pretoria, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © Lepidopterists’ Society of Africa Abstract: This paper applies the findings of phylogenetic studies on butterflies (Papilionoidea) in order to present an up to date classification of the Afrotropical butterflies to genus level. The classification for Afrotropical butterflies is placed within a worldwide context to subtribal level. Taxa that still require interrogation are highlighted. Hopefully this classification will provide a stable context for researchers working on Afrotropical butterflies. Key words: Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea, Afrotropical butterflies, classification. Citation: Williams, M.C. (2015). Classification of the Afrotropical butterflies to generic level. Metamorphosis 26: 102–108. INTRODUCTION Suborder Glossata Fabricius, 1775 (6 infraorders) Infraorder Heteroneura Tillyard, 1918 (34 Natural classifications of biological organisms, based superfamilies) on robust phylogenetic hypotheses, are needed before Clade Obtectomera Minet, 1986 (12 superfamilies) meaningful studies can be conducted in regard to their Superfamily Papilionoidea Latreille, 1802 (7 evolution, biogeography, ecology and conservation. families) Classifications, dating from the time of Linnaeus in the Family Papilionidae Latreille, 1802 (32 genera, 570 mid seventeen hundreds, were based on morphology species) for nearly two hundred and fifty years. Classifications Family Hedylidae Guenée, 1858 (1 genus, 36 species) based on phylogenies derived from an interrogation of Family Hesperiidae Latreille, 1809 (570 genera, 4113 the genome of individual organisms began in the late species) 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Pitta Tour & Black-Cheeked Lovebird Extension 01 - 11 December 2015 Tour Leader Tertius Gous Photographs by Tertius Gous Taken on This Tour
    Zambia Pitta Tour & Black-cheeked Lovebird Extension 01 - 11 December 2015 Tour Leader Tertius Gous Photographs by Tertius Gous taken on this tour www.birdingafrica.com Day 1: The first day was mostly a travel day as we departed from Livingstone at noon and traveled in a westerly direction to our lodge situated along the Zambezi River. Roadside birds seen during the journey consisted of Pied Crow, Helmeted Guineafowl, Yellow-billed Kite, Knob-billed Duck, White- browed Sparrow-weaver, Meve’s Starling and Hamerkop. We made a short birding stop in some well-developed mopane woodland where we recorded Southern Carmine and Blue-cheeked Bee- eaters, Red-breasted Swallow, Grey-backed Camaroptera, Brubru and White-crested Helmet- Shrike. Our lodge was situated along a quiet backwater of the Zambezi River and late afternoon birding produced good sightings of Southern Masked-Weaver, Holub’s Golden Weaver, African Jacana, African Openbill, White-faced Duck, Wire-tailed Swallow, White-winged Tern, while Little Rush Warbler and Luapula Cisticola called from the reed beds. Days 2 - 3: We were woken the next morning by the melodious calls of White-browed Robin-Chats emanating from the lush riverine vegetation and gardens of the lodge. Breakfast was served on a wooden deck overlooking the river and we soon got onto a Slaty Egret foraging along the shore, while the antics of Tilapia around their nesting circles in the river was fascinating to watch. The morning was alive with birds and our list was growing quickly with additions such as Red- billed Francolin, Swamp Boubou, Southern Grey- headed Sparrow, African Mourning Dove, Common Waxbill, nesting African Paradise-Flycatcher, Southern Brown-throated Weaver, Brown and Red- billed Firefinch, White- browed and Coppery-tailed Coucal, African Green Pigeon and Diderik Cuckoo.
    [Show full text]
  • Eli Greenbaum, Ph.D
    ELI GREENBAUM, PH.D. Curriculum Vitae PRESENT ADDRESS University of Texas at El Paso Cell: (785) 393-3583 Dept. of Biological Sciences Office: (915) 747-5553 500 West University Ave. Lab: (915) 747-5645 El Paso, TX 79968* FAX: (915) 747-5808 *zip code 79902 for FEDEX deliveries E-mail: [email protected] WEBSITES Homepage: http://eligreenbaum.iss.utep.edu/default.htm Blog from 2014: http://greenbaum2014.at.utep.edu/category/fieldwork/2014-expedition/ Blog from 2013: http://greenbaum.at.utep.edu/index.php/2013-expedition ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2013–present. Associate Professor, Dept. of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso. 2008–2012. Assistant Professor, Dept. of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso. 2006–2008. Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Dept. of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA. EDUCATION 2006. Ph.D. (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology). The University of Kansas, Lawrence. Oral exam: 4 November 2002. Dissertation title: Molecular systematics of New World microhyline frogs, with an emphasis on the Middle American genus Hypopachus. Dissertation defense: 25 January 2006 (defended with honors). Advisor: Dr. Linda Trueb. 1998. M.S. (Biology). University of Louisiana at Monroe, Monroe. Thesis title: Sexual differentiation in the spiny softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera). Advisor: Dr. John L. Carr. 1996. B.S. (Biological Sciences). Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York. 1992. High School Diploma. City Honors High School, Buffalo, New York. PENDING GRANTS 2014. Institute for Museum and Library Services, Museums for America Program, $150,000. Natural History Collection Stewardship for the 21st Century at the University of Texas at El Paso. PI. Resubmission. 2015. NSF Biodiversity: Discovery & Analysis Program.
    [Show full text]
  • A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard Papers in the Biological Sciences 2010 The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World" (2010). Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard. 20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciducksgeeseswans/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World by Paul A. Johnsgard by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 200 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World Paul A. Johnsgard Pages xvii–xxiii: recent taxonomic changes, I have revised sev- Introduction to the Family Anatidae eral of the range maps to conform with more current information. For these updates I have Since the 978 publication of my Ducks, Geese relied largely on Kear (2005). and Swans of the World hundreds if not thou- Other important waterfowl books published sands of publications on the Anatidae have since 978 and covering the entire waterfowl appeared, making a comprehensive literature family include an identification guide to the supplement and text updating impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Anisoptera: Libellulidae)
    Odonatologica 7 (3): 237-245 September I, 1978 Reproductive behaviourof Acisoma panorpoidesinflatum Selys (Anisoptera: Libellulidae) A.T. Hassan Entomology Research Laboratory, Department ofZoology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria Received December 21, 1977 / Accepted February 20, 1978 The observations were carried out at 2 localities in Nigeria. The dd defend territories, maintained on a temporary basis. The number of days on which individuals visited water varied from 1-14 (mean 5.33). The territory length in amounted to 1.5-2.0 m (between 09.00-10.30 hrs), and 0.50-0.75 m (later the day). The territories were defended for 842 min. Sperm transfer was not between 3.9-6.8 observed after a d had secured a 9. Copulation ranged sec. the Both sexes mated more than once daily. After copulation partners were resting either separately or, infrequently, in tandem (0.0-106.7 sec). Ovi- position is complex and lasted for 20.9-160.3 sec (mean 74.7). The perching plants provided suitable oviposition sites. INTRODUCTION Reproductive behaviour of libellulid dragonflies, particularly males, had been observed MOORE and experimented on by various workers, e.g. (1952, 1957, 1960), JACOBS (1955), 1TO (1060), KORMONDY (1961), PAJUNEN (1962), CAMPANELLA (1972), PARR & PARR (1974), and GREEN (1974), amongst others, revealed that libellulids hold and defend territories, and exhibit localiza- tion to varying degrees. of This investigation is an examination of the reproductive behaviour Acisoma panorpoides inflatum Selys with respect to the time of arrival at water, the size and maintenance of the territory, the degree of localization, and copulation and oviposition behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • TNP SOK 2011 Internet
    GARDEN ROUTE NATIONAL PARK : THE TSITSIKAMMA SANP ARKS SECTION STATE OF KNOWLEDGE Contributors: N. Hanekom 1, R.M. Randall 1, D. Bower, A. Riley 2 and N. Kruger 1 1 SANParks Scientific Services, Garden Route (Rondevlei Office), PO Box 176, Sedgefield, 6573 2 Knysna National Lakes Area, P.O. Box 314, Knysna, 6570 Most recent update: 10 May 2012 Disclaimer This report has been produced by SANParks to summarise information available on a specific conservation area. Production of the report, in either hard copy or electronic format, does not signify that: the referenced information necessarily reflect the views and policies of SANParks; the referenced information is either correct or accurate; SANParks retains copies of the referenced documents; SANParks will provide second parties with copies of the referenced documents. This standpoint has the premise that (i) reproduction of copywrited material is illegal, (ii) copying of unpublished reports and data produced by an external scientist without the author’s permission is unethical, and (iii) dissemination of unreviewed data or draft documentation is potentially misleading and hence illogical. This report should be cited as: Hanekom N., Randall R.M., Bower, D., Riley, A. & Kruger, N. 2012. Garden Route National Park: The Tsitsikamma Section – State of Knowledge. South African National Parks. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 2. ACCOUNT OF AREA........................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]