DOCSLIB.ORG

Feasibility Study for Biodiversity Accounting in Uganda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feasibility Study for Biodiversity Accounting in Uganda UNEP-WCMC Scoping report Feasibility Study for Biodiversity Accounting in Uganda Scoping report Authors King, S., Wilson, L., Brown, C., Vause, J., Harfoot, M., Mapendembe, A., van Soesbergen, A., Kaggwa, R., Ogwal, F. & Tushabe, H. Published July 2016 Copyright©2016 United Nations Environment Programme In collaboration with National Planning Authority (NPA) of Uganda, National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) of Uganda & National Biodiversity Data Bank (NBDB), Makerere University. Citation UNEP-WCMC (2016) Feasibility Study for Biodiversity Accounting in Uganda. Cambridge, UK. The United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) is the specialist biodiversity assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation for over 30 years, combining scientific research with practical policy advice. This document has been produced based on a series of stakeholder engagements and a stakeholder workshop completed in Uganda in January 2016 and a series of follow up enquiries. We are very grateful to all who participated in this process and contributed to this document. The work has been funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Swedish International Development Cooperation (SIDA). Disclaimer The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP, the Government of Norway, the Government of Sweden, contributory organizations or editors. The designations employed and the presentations of material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations, editors or publishers concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries or the designation of its name, frontiers or boundaries. The mention of a commercial entity or product in this publication does not imply endorsement by UNEP. ISBN: 978-92-807-3584-0 DEP/2019/CA UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) 219 Huntingdon Road, UNEP promotes Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK environmentally sound Tel: +44 1223 277314 practices globally and in its www.unep-wcmc.org own activities. Our distribution policy aims to reduce UNEP’s carbon footprint Scoping report Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Biodiversity in Uganda ...................................................................................................................................... 11 2. Desk-Based Assessment of Policy Entry Points ............................................................................................ 17 3. Stakeholder Engagement ............................................................................................................................... 28 4. Review of Spatial Data ..................................................................................................................................... 32 5. Review of habitat-based approaches ............................................................................................................. 36 6. Risk-Register Framework. .............................................................................................................................. 40 7. Next Steps ........................................................................................................................................................ 49 8. Conclusions. ..................................................................................................................................................... 55 References ............................................................................................................................................................. 57 Appendices ........................................................................................................................................................... 61 Appendix A: Initial Stakeholder Workshop for Biodiversity Accounting in Uganda Appendix B: Review of Data to inform Biodiversity Accounting in Uganda Appendix C: Proposal for extended Stakeholder Engagement Workshop 2 Scoping report List of figures and tables Figures Figure 1: Living Uganda Index for vertebrate trends in forest, freshwater and savannah (Pomeroy & Tushabe, 2004) ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 2: Living Uganda Index and Living Planet Index for vertebrate trends (Pomeroy et al., 2006)....... 12 Figure 3: Framework for mobilising data for ecosystem accounting in Uganda (adapted from a diagram produced in the EU BON Project) ...................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 4: Key policy documents reviewed ......................................................................................................... 19 Figure 5. Conceptual framework for the risk register (Mace et al. 2015) ........................................................ 41 Figure 6. Risk Register scoring matrix (a) and results (b) (Mace et al. 2015) ................................................ 42 Figure 7: The relationship between natural capital assets and benefits ........................................................ 44 Tables Table 1: Summary of policy entry points for species and ecosystem accounts in Uganda ........................... 27 Table 2: Priority ecosystems services and species ........................................................................................... 29 Table 3: Priority policy questions and relevant policies................................................................................... 31 Table 4a. Risk register framework for Uganda................................................................................................. 46 Table 4b. Risk register scoring matrix. ............................................................................................................. 46 . 3 Scoping report Executive Summary Biodiversity is an important part of Uganda’s natural capital stock. The interaction of species and ecosystems (as components of biodiversity generally) deliver a variety of ecosystem services that directly and indirectly contribute to national development and the livelihoods of Ugandans. The sustainable use of the stocks of ecosystems and the species they contain is fundamental to maximizing economic growth and human well- being in Uganda over the medium to long terms. However, the services provided by these aspects of biodiversity are typically provided outside of markets. This results an undervaluation of ecosystems and species, and in the omission of the depletion of natural capital stocks in traditional national accounts of economic progress. The National Development Plan II (NDP II) for Uganda explicitly recognises the need for rational and sustainable use of the environment and natural resources in pursuit of sustained economic growth and socio-economic transformation. Integrating the environment and natural resources into the national accounting system is identified as a key intervention in this regard. This can also inform a number of other key policy initiatives in Uganda, including Uganda’s Green Growth Strategy, National Environmental Management Policy and National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan, among others. The System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EEA, 2014), has been developed in response to such demands for integrated environmental and economic accounts. Biodiversity accounting is one of the several accounting themes within the SEEA-EEA. This feasibility study is the product of a joint initiative between UNEP-WCMC, NPA and NEMA. This document presents the results of a feasibility study for biodiversity accounting in Uganda. Specifically, the potential to construct Species Accounts and accounts of changes in ecosystem extent (Ecosystem Extent Accounts) is evaluated. This has been informed by desk based assessment, a series of stakeholder engagements and inquiries and a stakeholder workshop in Kampala in January 2016. The study is based on the approach to constructing Species Accounts presented in UNEP-WCMC (2016), which should be read in conjunction with this document. The study has established that there are clear policy entry points and applications where information from both ecosystem and species accounts could inform policy and decision making, for example: Informing the ongoing debates on gazettement and degazettement of protected areas Increasing awareness and appreciation of biodiversity as a natural capital asset amongst decision makers and the public. Making the case for increased budget allocation and investment in biodiversity rich sectors for biodiversity conservation and management. Establishing the extent of ecosystem degradation and where biodiversity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cattle Egret Bubulcus Ibis the Cattle Egret Has Enjoyed the Most Explosive Natural Range Expansion of Any Bird in Recorded His- Tory
    Herons and Bitterns — Family Ardeidae 139 Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis The Cattle Egret has enjoyed the most explosive natural range expansion of any bird in recorded his- tory. In 25 years it went from being a new arrival to the most abundant bird in southeastern California’s Imperial Valley. In San Diego County, however, it has seen a reversal as well as an advance. Since the spe- cies first nested in 1979, colonies have formed and vanished in quick succession; from 1997 through 2001 the only important one was that at the Wild Animal Park. After a peak in the 1980s the popula- tion has been on the decline; the conversion of pas- tures and dairies to urban sprawl spells no good for this bird whose lifestyle is linked to livestock. Breeding distribution: The Cattle Egret colony at the Wild Animal Park (J12) is part of the mixed-species heronry in the Heart of Africa exhibit—a site eminently Photo by Anthony Mercieca suitable for this species of African origin. Maximum numbers reported here in the breeding season during the Beyond a 15-mile radius of the Wild Animal Park, the atlas period were 100 individuals on 15 June 1998 (D. and Cattle Egret is uncommon and irregular, especially during D. Bylin) and 43 nests on 9 May 1999 (K. L. Weaver). the breeding season. It is still rather frequent in the San Luis In 2001, one or two pairs nested in the multispecies Rey River valley between Oceanside and Interstate 15 (up to heronry at Lindo Lake, Lakeside (P14).
    [Show full text]
  • Bird) Species List
    Aves (Bird) Species List Higher Classification1 Kingdom: Animalia, Phyllum: Chordata, Class: Reptilia, Diapsida, Archosauria, Aves Order (O:) and Family (F:) English Name2 Scientific Name3 O: Tinamiformes (Tinamous) F: Tinamidae (Tinamous) Great Tinamou Tinamus major Highland Tinamou Nothocercus bonapartei O: Galliformes (Turkeys, Pheasants & Quail) F: Cracidae Black Guan Chamaepetes unicolor (Chachalacas, Guans & Curassows) Gray-headed Chachalaca Ortalis cinereiceps F: Odontophoridae (New World Quail) Black-breasted Wood-quail Odontophorus leucolaemus Buffy-crowned Wood-Partridge Dendrortyx leucophrys Marbled Wood-Quail Odontophorus gujanensis Spotted Wood-Quail Odontophorus guttatus O: Suliformes (Cormorants) F: Fregatidae (Frigatebirds) Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens O: Pelecaniformes (Pelicans, Tropicbirds & Allies) F: Ardeidae (Herons, Egrets & Bitterns) Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis O: Charadriiformes (Sandpipers & Allies) F: Scolopacidae (Sandpipers) Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularius O: Gruiformes (Cranes & Allies) F: Rallidae (Rails) Gray-Cowled Wood-Rail Aramides cajaneus O: Accipitriformes (Diurnal Birds of Prey) F: Cathartidae (Vultures & Condors) Black Vulture Coragyps atratus Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura F: Pandionidae (Osprey) Osprey Pandion haliaetus F: Accipitridae (Hawks, Eagles & Kites) Barred Hawk Morphnarchus princeps Broad-winged Hawk Buteo platypterus Double-toothed Kite Harpagus bidentatus Gray-headed Kite Leptodon cayanensis Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus Ornate Hawk-Eagle Spizaetus ornatus Red-tailed
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Fauna
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 1 Effects of Fire on Fauna January 2000 Abstract _____________________________________ Smith, Jane Kapler, ed. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 83 p. Fires affect animals mainly through effects on their habitat. Fires often cause short-term increases in wildlife foods that contribute to increases in populations of some animals. These increases are moderated by the animals’ ability to thrive in the altered, often simplified, structure of the postfire environment. The extent of fire effects on animal communities generally depends on the extent of change in habitat structure and species composition caused by fire. Stand-replacement fires usually cause greater changes in the faunal communities of forests than in those of grasslands. Within forests, stand- replacement fires usually alter the animal community more dramatically than understory fires. Animal species are adapted to survive the pattern of fire frequency, season, size, severity, and uniformity that characterized their habitat in presettlement times. When fire frequency increases or decreases substantially or fire severity changes from presettlement patterns, habitat for many animal species declines. Keywords: fire effects, fire management, fire regime, habitat, succession, wildlife The volumes in “The Rainbow Series” will be published during the year 2000. To order, check the box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Red River National Wildlife Refuge
    Red River National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region July 2008 COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN RED RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Caddo, Bossier, DeSoto, Red River, and Natchitoches Parishes, Louisiana U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia July 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 I. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need for the Plan ...................................................................................................... 3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ........................................................................................................ 3 National Wildlife Refuge System .................................................................................................... 4 Legal and Policy Context ................................................................................................................ 6 National and International Conservation Plans and Initiatives ........................................................ 7 Relationship
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Botanical and Faunal Surveys
    APPENDIX B BOTANICAL AND FAUNAL SURVEYS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY for the WAIKAPU COUNTRY TOWN PROJECT WAIKAPU, WAILUKU DISTRICT, MAUI by Robert W. Hobdy Environmental Consultant Kokomo, Maui February 2013 Prepared for: Waikapu Properties LLC 1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY WAIKAPU COUNTRY TOWN PROJECT Waikapū, Maui, Hawaii INTRODUCTION The Waikapū Country Town Project lies on approximately 520 acres of land on the southeast slopes of the West Maui mountains just south of Waikapū Stream and the village of Waikapū (see Figure 1). The project area straddles the Honoapi′ilani Highway and includes the Maui Tropical Plantation facilities and surrounding agriculture and pasture lands, TMKs (2) 3-6-02:003 por., (2) 3-6-04:003 and 006 por. and (2) 3-6-05:007. SITE DESCRIPTION The project area includes about 70 acres that comprise the facilities of the Maui Tropical Plantation. This is surrounded by 50 acres of vegetable farm. On the slopes above this are 150 acres of cattle pasture, and below the highway are 240 acres in sugar cane production. Elevations range from 250 feet at the lower end up to 800 feet at the top of the pastures. Soils are all deep, well-drained alluvial soils which are classified in the Wailuku Silty Clay, Iao Clay and Pulehu Cobbly Clay Loam soil series (Foote et al, 1972). The vegetation consists of a great variety of ornamental plant species on the grounds of the Maui Tropical Plantation, a diversity of vegetable crop plants, pasture grasses and dense fields of sugar cane. Annual rainfall ranges from 25 inches in the lower end up to 30 inches at the top (Armstrong, 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle Egret Bubulcusibis ILLINOIS RANGE
    cattle egret Bubulcus ibis Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata An adult cattle egret is 20 inches in length. Both the Class: Aves male and female have white body feathers. During Order: Pelecaniformes the breeding season the male has orange-tan feathers on its back, chest and top of the head. This Family: Ardeidae bird has a yellow bill. The mature bird will have ILLINOIS STATUS coral-colored legs while others have yellow-green legs. common, nonnative BEHAVIORS ILLINOIS RANGE The cattle egret is an uncommon summer resident in Illinois and a common but irregular migrant through the state. It lives on farms, mudflats, airfields, golf courses and marshes. This species mainly eats toads and insects, especially flies and grasshoppers. It is usually found near cattle and other livestock because they keep insects moving as they feed in the pasture. Its neck is held in an "S" formation during flight with its legs trailing straight out behind its body. This bird nests in colonies with other herons. Spring migrants arrive in March. Four to five pale blue eggs are laid in a nest. The cattle egret is native to Europe, Asia and Africa. It spread naturally to South and North America in the late 1800s. The first Illinois record is from 1952. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. adult male stevebyland/pond5.com © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Aquatic Habitats lakes, ponds and reservoirs; temporary water supplies Woodland Habitats none Prairie and Edge Habitats edge © Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Toro Semliki Wildlife Reserve GMP 2020-2029
    TORO-SEMLIKI WILDLIFE RESERVE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020/21 – 2029/30 A Growing Population of Uganda Kobs in the Reserve TSWR GMP 2020/21 - 2029/30 TORO-SEMLIKI WILDLIFE RESERVE GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020/21 – 2029/30 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.........................................................................................................................................................................v FOREWORD..............................................................................................................................................................................................vi APPROVAL...............................................................................................................................................................................................vii ACRONYMS.............................................................................................................................................................................................viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................................................x PART 1: BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................................1.1 THE PLANNING PROCESS...................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Birds and Spread of West Nile Virus in the Western Hemisphere
    Perspectives Migratory Birds and Spread of West Nile Virus in the Western Hemisphere John H. Rappole,* Scott R. Derrickson,* and Zdenek Hubálek† *Conservation and Research Center, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Front Royal, Virginia, USA; and †Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences, Valtice, Czech Republic West Nile virus, an Old World flavivirus related to St. Louis encephalitis virus, was first recorded in the New World during August 1999 in the borough of Queens, New York City. Through October 1999, 62 patients, 7 of whom died, had confirmed infections with the virus. Ornithophilic mosquitoes are the principal vectors of West Nile virus in the Old World, and birds of several species, chiefly migrants, appear to be the major introductory or amplifying hosts. If transovarial transmission or survival in overwintering mosquitoes were the principal means for its persistence, West Nile virus might not become established in the New World because of aggressive mosquito suppression campaigns conducted in the New York area. However, the pattern of outbreaks in southern Europe suggests that viremic migratory birds may also contribute to movement of the virus. If so, West Nile virus has the potential to cause outbreaks throughout both temperate and tropical regions of the Western Hemisphere. The first known human case of West Nile [Pica pica], Bronze-winged Ducks [Anas virus infection recorded in the Western Hemi- specularis], Impeyan Pheasants [Lophophorus sphere was reported in August 1999 (1). impeyanus], Blyth’s Tragopans [Tragopan blythi], Eventually, 62 cases of the disease were and Snowy Owls [Nyctea scandia]) (6). confirmed; no new cases have been reported since The spatial and temporal juxtaposition of October 16, 1999 (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian and Reptilian Inventories Augmented by Sampling at Heronries
    WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS IRCF REPTILES • VOL15, &NO AMPHIBIANS 4 • DEC 2008 189 • 23(1):68–73 • APR 2016 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS METHODS FEATURE ARTICLES . Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: AmphibianOn the Road to Understanding the Ecologyand and Conservation Reptilian of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent Inventories ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 AugmentedRESEARCH ARTICLES by Sampling at Heronries . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 1 2 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in FloridaRaju Vyas and B. M. Parasharya 1Krishnadeep ............................................. Tower, MissionBrian Road,J. Camposano, Fatehgunj, Kenneth Vadodara L. Krysko, Kevin300 002,M. Enge, Gujarat, Ellen M. India Donlan, ([email protected]) and Michael Granatosky 212 2Agricultural Ornithology, Anand Agricultural University, Anand 388 110, Gujarat, India ([email protected]) CONSERVATION ALERT . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bubulcus Ibis (Cattle Egret) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material
    Bubulcus ibis (Cattle Egret) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 3 Sources of reported national population data p. 5 Species factsheet bibliography p. 7 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Bubulcus ibis (Cattle Egret) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Armenia 30-80 <1 2002-2012 good ? ? Azerbaijan 3,500-7,000 6 2014 poor - 2000-2014 - 1980-2014 poor Belgium 0-1 <1 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2000-2012 good ? B.
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle Egret Bubulcus Ibis Habitat Use and Association with Cattle
    174 SHORT NOTES Forktail 21 (2005) REFERENCES Mauro, I. (2001) Cinnabar Hawk Owl Ninox ios at Lore Lindu National Park, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, in December 1998. Lee, R. J. and Riley, J. (2001) Morphology, plumage, and habitat of Forktail 17: 118–119. the newly described Cinnabar Hawk-Owl from North Sulawesi, Rasmussen, P. C. (1999) A new species of hawk-owl Ninox from Indonesia. Wilson Bull. 113(1): 17–22. North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Wilson Bull. 111(4): 457–464. Ben King, Ornithology Dept., American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, NY10024, U.S.A. Email: [email protected] Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis habitat use and association with cattle K. SEEDIKKOYA, P. A. AZEEZ and E. A. A. SHUKKUR Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis has a worldwide distribution. made five counts per day from 06h00 to 18h00. Egrets In India it is common in a variety of habitats, especially were defined as associated with cattle if they were wetlands, throughout the peninsula. Freshwater found <1 m from an animal and were alert to its marshes and paddy fields were identified as the most movements. We carried out focal observations on important foraging habitats by Meyerricks (1962) and randomly selected foraging egrets, during which we Seedikkoya (2004), although there are pronounced recorded number of strikes, successful captures seasonal variations in the usage of these habitats. Cattle (identified by the characteristic head-jerk swallowing Egrets are often found associated with cattle and behaviour: Heatwole 1965, Dinsmore 1973, Grubb occasionally with pigs, goats, and horses, and also with 1976, Scott 1984) and number of steps in a two- moving vehicles such as tractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationally Threatened Species for Uganda
    Nationally Threatened Species for Uganda National Red List for Uganda for the following Taxa: Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Butterflies, Dragonflies and Vascular Plants JANUARY 2016 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research team and authors of the Uganda Redlist comprised of Sarah Prinsloo, Dr AJ Plumptre and Sam Ayebare of the Wildlife Conservation Society, together with the taxonomic specialists Dr Robert Kityo, Dr Mathias Behangana, Dr Perpetra Akite, Hamlet Mugabe, and Ben Kirunda and Dr Viola Clausnitzer. The Uganda Redlist has been a collaboration beween many individuals and institutions and these have been detailed in the relevant sections, or within the three workshop reports attached in the annexes. We would like to thank all these contributors, especially the Government of Uganda through its officers from Ugandan Wildlife Authority and National Environment Management Authority who have assisted the process. The Wildlife Conservation Society would like to make a special acknowledgement of Tullow Uganda Oil Pty, who in the face of limited biodiversity knowledge in the country, and specifically in their area of operation in the Albertine Graben, agreed to fund the research and production of the Uganda Redlist and this report on the Nationally Threatened Species of Uganda. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE .......................................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]