5th National Monitoring Conference Monitoring Networks: Connecting for Clean Water San José, California • May 7–11, 2006
Conference Themes Assessing methods & data comparability Applying new methods & innovative techniques Addressing different scales & multiple objectives Synthesizing & sharing data Improving communication among all stakeholders Integrating monitoring & prediction Large-scale programs: Results, lessons learned, & future directions Conference Program and Presenter Information
Welcome to the Fifth National Monitoring Conference in San José, California!
Dear Colleagues:
WELCOME TO THE CONFERENCE! We are delighted you could join us as we highlight the human, technological, and programmatic networks that connect all of us working for clean water. For this conference, we received over 500 abstracts from our colleagues in all sectors of the monitoring community in the United States as well as abroad. This year’s program is rich in scope and content, including an unprecedented 335 platform presentations, over 130 technical posters, sixteen workshops and short courses, and 45 exhibits. Of special note, this year’s agenda also features:
Discussion sessions and presentations focused on large-scale collaborative monitoring networks, such as the proposed National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries, Presentations by our colleagues in California describing how they have implemented innovative monitoring networks across the state, Informal meetings and workshops encouraging volunteer monitoring program coordinators to exchange information, develop new skills, and build better networks, and Platform sessions showcasing the USGS National Water-Quality Assessment Program’s new findings on the quality of the Nation’s streams and ground water.
This Conference Program will provide you with a general overview of conference activities and contains: 3 Collaborative Partnership for Water Quality Monitoring providing an introduction to the National Water Quality Monitoring Council, its mission, and membership 3 A thank you to our Conference Sponsors 3 Elizabeth J. Fellows Award Announcement honoring this year’s recipient of the EJF Award 3 Acknowledgments recognizing the individuals, organizations, agencies, and businesses that planned this year’s conference 3 A list of Conference Exhibitors 3 A full Conference Agenda listing times and locations for all conference activities 3 A list of Poster Presentations grouped by topic Each attendee will also receive a CD that contains all of the information above plus the abstracts for all oral and poster presentations, workshops, and short courses.
We invite you to join us in making this conference an opportunity to share our experiences and explore the critical elements of building effective networks.
Sincerely yours,
Charles S. Spooner Gail E. Mallard Co-Chair, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Co-Chair, U.S. Geological Survey
“It is in the marriage of credible data use and increased stewardship behavior that the true potential and vitality of citizen monitoring begins to emerge.” – Steven Hubbell ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Welcome friends, colleagues, and conference participants,
On behalf of the extensive volunteer monitoring community, we welcome you to this conference and invite you to experience presentations highlighting the broad spectrum of volunteer monitoring activities. Across the country, and indeed throughout the world, volunteer monitors watch over watersheds, often where no one else is looking. They monitor the condition of streams, rivers, lakes, reservoirs, estuaries, coastal waters, wetlands, and wells. They do this because they want to help protect or restore a favorite water body near where they live, work, or play. They do this to ensure safe drinking water. They educate themselves, their community, and decision-makers. They recognize the importance of their role as watershed stewards. They make a difference. Volunteers do physical, chemical and biological monitoring. They measure Secchi depth in lakes, identify stream benthic macroinvertebrates, and monitor bacteria levels. They make visual observations of habitat, land uses, and storm impacts, and assess the abundance and diversity of plants, fish, birds, and other wildlife. Some have undertaken more exotic activities, examining water samples for toxic phytoplankton or monitoring the health of coral reefs. Volunteers count and catalog beach debris, participate in restoring degraded habitats, and help monitor the success of restoration efforts. When you talk to state agency staff about uses of volunteer monitoring data, they tend to focus on state-level uses like EPA’s 305(b) report and 303(d) listing. And indeed volunteer data are increasingly finding their way into state reports and TMDL plans. But volunteer organizations are quick to point out that state-level uses are not the holy grail of volunteer data use. Volunteer monitoring is for the most part a local activity with local impacts. Watershed associations, lakefront homeowner associations, and other community groups use their monitoring data to guide their own restoration projects and management activities. They present their data to local planning committees or town councils to support proposals for protective ordinances and policies. Volunteer monitoring of lakes and streams began in the 1970s and grew rapidly. Many volunteer monitoring programs have been going strong for more than 20 years, providing an unparalleled long-term record of water quality and the ability to assess whether water quality improvement and restoration projects are truly working. As volunteer monitoring has grown and matured, programs increasingly emphasize assuring data quality and documenting metadata so that the comparability of their data to that of others can be recognized. Credibility is key. We invite all conference participants to take advantage of workshops, presentations, and informal exchanges, indeed to Connect for Clean Water with all members our vibrant monitoring community, especially those at this conference!
For our waters,
The Volunteer Monitoring Conference Planning Sub-Committee United States Department of the Interior
U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Reston, VA 20192 Mail Stop 413
May 7, 2006
Colleagues and Conference Participants,
On behalf of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program, I am pleased to welcome you to the 5th National Monitoring Conference in San José, California. I am honored that the National Water Quality Monitoring Council offered the NAWQA Program an opportunity to play a major role in the conference.
In particular, we in NAWQA are excited to share with you our recent national-scale findings on pesticides and volatile organic contaminants from data collected in the first decade of the Program, 1992-2001. In addition, we bring to the conference our latest approaches and methods, for example, models that make the important step of moving us forward from monitoring to prediction of water quality conditions. Prediction of water quality conditions in unsampled waters is an important next step because water quality-assessment is something we need for all waters, not just those we can afford to monitor. We also bring to the conference early results on approaches to assessing and understanding the sources, fate, transport, and effects of contaminants in ground water and streams, and the effects of mercury and urbanization on aquatic ecosystems.
The quality of this conference is the reason we return each biennium. The quality is the result of the activities and contributions of a large number of individuals that make up the membership of the National Water Quality Monitoring Council. I want to thank all those who made this week possible and wish you a beneficial and productive time in San José.
Sincerely,
Donna N. Myers, Chief National Water-Quality Assessment Program
2006 National Monitoring Conference Program
Welcome to the City of San José Welcome from the National Water Quality Monitoring Council Welcome from the Volunteer Monitoring Conference Planning Sub-Committee Welcome from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program
Table of Contents
The National Water Quality Monitoring Council: Collaborative Partnership for Water Quality Monitoring ...... 8
A National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries ...... 12
Conference Sponsors...... 13
Elizabeth J. Fellows Award Announcement...... 15
Acknowledgments ...... 17
Conference Exhibitors...... 19
Conference Agenda ...... 21
Poster Presentations ...... 36 Abstract Pages
Concurrent Session Block A ...... 45
Concurrent Session Block B ...... 52
Concurrent Session Block C……………………..…….………………...... 83
Concurrent Session Block D ...... 112
Concurrent Session Block E ...... 139
Concurrent Session Block F...... 169
Concurrent Session Block G ………………….……………………...... 200
Concurrent Session Block H ...... 231
Concurrent Session Block I ...... 257
Concurrent Session Block J ...... 288
Concurrent Session Block K ...... 316
Concurrent Session Block L...... 351 Concurrent Session Block M ...... 383 Poster Abstract Pages ...... 416
Conference Attendee Contact Information...... 560
Collaborative Partnership for Water Quality Monitoring
Introduction Responding to the Challenge: The National Water The National Water Quality Monitoring Council (Council) Quality Monitoring Council provides an opportunity for the monitoring community to The Council provides guidance and technical support develop consensus-based approaches and tools for monitoring for voluntary implementation of actions that advance the and reporting on water quality. The Council promotes science of monitoring. This is best accomplished in an arena partnerships that foster collaboration, advance the science, of collaborative and coordinated efforts communicated to and improve management of our water resources. The all interested parties. In sum these actions will ultimately Council strives to represent the full range of the monitoring improve water quality monitoring. The Council encourages community. use of metadata, lab accreditation, methods documentation, and other procedures that contribute to the broadest possible acceptance, sharing, and use of water quality data. The Council Council Mission promotes effective communication of monitoring results and fi ndings to decision-makers and the general public. In some Provide a national forum to coordinate consistent and cases, Council work groups develop tools and techniques. scientifi cally defensible methods and strategies for improving water quality monitoring, assessment, and reporting. Examples of these are the National Environmental Methods Index and Water Quality Data Elements. In other cases, the Council provides a venue for wide-ranging discussion and dissemination of new methods and technologies developed The Challenge of Multi-Agency Monitoring by others through its Web site and at its National Monitoring Each year government agencies, industry, academia and Conferences. private organizations devote enormous amounts of time, energy, and money to monitor, protect, manage, and restore water resources and watersheds. Differences in project design, methods, data analysis, and data management have often made it diffi cult for monitoring information and results to be shared and used by all. The restoration and protection of water quality is dependent upon detailed, understandable, and easily accessible data and information.
Fact Sheet: Collaborative Partnership for Water Quality Monitoring
8 Membership and Organization A Framework for Monitoring The Council was created in 1997 as a vehicle for bringing The Council, with broad and signifi cant input from the together the diverse expertise, skills, and talents needed monitoring community, has developed a pictorial framework to develop collaborative, comparable, and cost-effective for monitoring that shows the components of the monitoring approaches to water quality monitoring. The Council’s 35 process (as a series of interlinked cogs) needed to understand, members represent the monitoring community: federal, protect, and restore our water resources. Incorporating the tribal, state, interstate, local, and municipal governments; components of this framework into monitoring projects will watershed and environmental groups; the volunteer improve monitoring efforts, results, and communication of monitoring community; academia; and the private sector information. including the regulated community. These are organizations that collect, analyze, interpret, disseminate, or use water quality monitoring information as well as those that develop monitoring technology, guidelines, and/or standards. The Council is co-chaired by the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Council reports to the Advisory Committee on Water Information that operates under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
Council Work Groups
• Water Information Strategies defi nes and promotes goal- oriented monitoring by proposing strategies for network design, data analysis and interpretation, and reporting results in support of the information needs of water quality management. • Methods and Data Comparability Board provides a forum for exploring, evaluating, and promoting methods that facilitate collaboration and further comparability among water quality monitoring programs. See Council Fact Sheet “A Framework for • Watershed Components Interactions provides an Water Quality Monitoring” and the American improved understanding of the factors affecting water Water Resources Association (AWRA) IMPACT, quality within watersheds. The group assesses how these September 2003 issue, Vol. 5, No. 5. factors interact to develop effective monitoring strategies. • Collaboration and Outreach works to build partnerships that foster collaboration among the many elements of the water monitoring community, particularly by supporting the development of state and regional monitoring councils, and promoting the importance of monitoring for decision- making.
Fact Sheet: Collaborative Partnership for Water Quality Monitoring
9 Council Activities and Products • Providing guidance and support for State and Regional The Council has taken a number of steps to encourage the water Water Quality Monitoring Councils (see Council Fact quality monitoring community to integrate the components of Sheet “Accomplishing More Together”). These councils the monitoring framework into their efforts. The following bring members of the monitoring community together examples of Council activities and products showcase efforts to share their expertise and knowledge and to promote to improve data comparability and reliability as well as to strategic monitoring efforts at an appropriate scale. foster institutional collaboration: • Sponsoring development and adoption of the National • Organizing and sponsoring biennial National Monitoring Environmental Methods Index (NEMI) that provides Conferences since 1998; each conference attended assistance in choosing appropriate fi eld and laboratory by more than 400 active participants representing a methods to meet specifi ed monitoring objectives. See wide spectrum of the monitoring community. These www.nemi.gov for additional information. conferences provide a national forum to present and • Sponsoring development and adoption of the Water explore methods and strategies for improving water Quality Data Elements — metadata that should quality monitoring, assessment, and reporting as well be included with water quality results so that data as presenting specifi c ways to foster collaboration and comparability can be assessed. coordination. • Publishing position papers on Laboratory Accreditation that describe a process that will give regulators and To participate in the National Monitoring Conference, visit: others in the monitoring community confi dence that http://www.nwqmc.org water quality data have been produced by qualifi ed personnel using appropriate quality control and quality assurance procedures.
Fact Sheet: Collaborative Partnership for Water Quality Monitoring
10 Member organizations of the Council
Federal: Other: U.S. Geological Survey Water Environment Federation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency North American Lake Management Society Natural Resources Conservation Service National Association of State Conservation Agencies Tennessee Valley Authority National Association of Conservation Districts National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies National Park Service Association of American State Geologists U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission American Society of Limnology and Oceanography Tribal: American Chemistry Council Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. University of Rhode Island, Watershed Watch Colorado State University, Water Resources Research Institute States representing Federal regions: National Association of Clean Water Agencies New Hampshire Department Environmental Services National Institutes of Water Resources New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Alabama Department of Environmental Management Indiana Department of Environmental Management Texas Commission on Environmental Quality California State Water Resources Control Board Washington Department of Ecology South Florida Water Management District Oregon Department of Environmental Quality West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Iowa Department of Natural Resources
Additional information can be obtained through the National Water Quality Monitoring Council’s Web site at: http://acwi.gov/monitoring /
Charles Spooner Gail Mallard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Geological Survey (202) 566-1174 (401) 322-0902 [email protected] [email protected]
Fact Sheet: Collaborative Partnership for Water Quality Monitoring April 2006 11
A National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries
The annual cost of water resource monitoring is hundreds of millions of dollars. Yet, numerous reports in recent years indicate that monitoring remains insufficient and lacks coordination to provide comprehensive information about U.S. water resources. The final report of the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy recommended a National Monitoring Network (Network) to assure effective stewardship of ocean resources. The National Water Quality Monitoring Council of the Advisory Committee on Water Information was asked to design such a Network, in part because of its broad membership, including federal, tribal, state and local agencies, water associations, universities and the private sector. The proposed Network shares many attributes with ongoing monitoring efforts but is unique in that it uses an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach to address a broad range of resource components, from upland watersheds to offshore waters. Key design features include:
• Clear objectives linked to management questions • Linkage to the Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) • Flexibility in design over time • Importance of metadata, quality assurance, comparable methods and ready access
The Network provides critical information about the quality of coastal waters and their tributaries at regional and national scales, but does not incorporate or replace all ongoing water quality monitoring. State and local agencies must continue to meet many regulatory and local needs, (e.g., monitoring for drinking water) that will be outside the scope of the Network. However, many existing state and regional monitoring programs may well become “network compliant” and both contribute to and benefit from the National Network.
Table 3-2 in the Executive Summary (available at the NWQMC exhibit booth) provides an at-a- glance overview of the Network design by resource component, including estuaries, nearshore, offshore, Great Lakes, rivers, ground water, atmospheric deposition, beaches and wetlands. Constituents to be monitored include physical characteristics, inorganic and organic chemical concentrations, and biological conditions. Continuity of measurements among all resource components will provide a better understanding of the linkages among resources.
Full implementation of the Network will require the use of data collected by a number of federal, tribal, state, local, academic, and private sources. Data must be comparable to allow integration into a coherent assessment of the condition of and trends in the quality of the Nation’s coastal waters and their tributaries. The use of models to interpret environmental data will facilitate understanding of complex environmental issues.
Plenary talks, special sessions and exhibits throughout the conference will provide opportunities for you to learn more about the Network design, and to provide important feedback to the National Water Quality Monitoring Council.
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA- A NATIONAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING NETWORK FOR U.S. COASTAL WATERS AND THEIR TRIBUTARIES
12 THANK YOU To our generous Conference Sponsors who have made the 2006 National Monitoring Conference a success!
Conference Co-Sponsors
National Water Quality U.S. Environmental U.S. Geological Survey North American Lake Monitoring Council Protection Agency Management Society
*California State Water National Association of Clean
Resources Control Board *USDA-CSREES Volunteer Water Agencies Water Quality Monitoring National Facilitation Project
Tennessee Valley Authority City of San José
Leading Sponsors
Bay Area Clean Water Agencies Tetra Tech, Inc. Water Environment Federation
*CSREES New England Regional Water Program
* This denotes those organizations that generously provided travel support for volunteer monitoring and watershed program coordinators.
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-CONFERENCE SPONSORS
13 Supporting Sponsor
San Francisco Estuary Institute
Contributing Sponsors
YSI Inc. *Ground Water *Astoria-Pacific California Stormwater Protection Council International Quality Association
*Greenspan Analytical
USDA-CSREES Contributing Sponsors
*Great Lakes *Heartland *New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, Regional Water Program Regional Water Virgin Islands Regional Water Coordination Initiative Coordination Program
*Northern Plains *Southern Regional *Southwest States *Tribal Colleges and Mountains Water Program and Pacific and Universities Regional Water Program Islands Regional National
Water Program Facilitation Project
* This denotes those organizations that generously provided travel support for volunteer monitoring and watershed program coordinators.
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-CONFERENCE SPONSORS
14
ELIZABETH JESTER FELLOWS AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT
Elizabeth J. Fellows headed the Assessment and Watershed Protection Division in USEPA’s Office of Water. She dedicated her career to natural resources management and environmental protection including envisioning the creation of the National Council. She was an effective advocate for developing a nationwide framework for coordinating, collecting, assessing, and communicating water quality monitoring information and results. In her memory, the National Water Quality Monitoring Council has established the Elizabeth Jester Fellows Award to recognize individuals for outstanding achievement, exemplary service, and distinguished leadership in the field of water quality monitoring.
In recognition of her contributions to water quality monitoring, the NWQMC is pleased to present the 2006 Elizabeth Jester Fellows Award to
Eleanor Ely Editor The Volunteer Monitor
In recognition of her contributions to water quality monitoring, the National Water Quality Monitoring Council is pleased to present the 2006 Elizabeth Jester Fellows Award to Eleanor Ely, editor of The Volunteer Monitor newsletter.
For sixteen years, Ellie has been the editor and driving force behind The Volunteer Monitor, the national newsletter for those who train and oversee the huge population of citizen volunteers across the country. Volunteer program coordinators all over the U.S. – and in many other countries – rely on the newsletter for technical advice on monitoring, sustaining programs,
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-EJF AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT
15 training volunteers, and many, many other topics. This newsletter is, in fact, the critical link connecting the thousands of diverse members of the volunteer monitoring community. Ellie’s persistence, patience, and unique editorial insight ensure that her publication is timely and timeless, an invaluable resource for the entire monitoring community, from volunteer to professional.
Ellie devotes a tremendous amount of time, effort, and energy into writing, editing, and producing each issue of The Volunteer Monitor newsletter. She has a critical eye for details, and researches and thoroughly masters each newsletter topic – from data management to bacteria monitoring. Most remarkably, Ellie can translate the most arcane bureaucratic doublespeak or scientific technospeak into plain, clearly understandable English. She cares very much about the newsletter’s technical and editorial quality, and is just as wholly dedicated to the volunteer monitoring movement itself; she knows more about individual volunteer monitoring programs and their leaders than any other person in the U.S. She is always eager to share her knowledge, experience, and connections with others, and to help forward the cause of volunteer environmental monitoring.
Ellie is a gifted writer, editor, and advocate of community-based environmental monitoring. Her selfless effort to enhance and advance the efforts of citizen volunteers has given them a greater voice in protecting and restoring the nation’s water resources. Her colleagues in the volunteer monitoring community nominated her for this award as an expression of their admiration and gratitude.
Congratulations, Ellie!
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-EJF AWARD ANNOUNCEMENT
16 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Council offers its gratitude to those who served on the 2006 Conference Planning Committee. The Council also acknowledges the commitment and hard work of all those who served as abstract review team leaders and members, session moderators, workshop/short course facilitators and trainers, and speakers. Many thanks go to all of the environmental monitoring professionals who prepared presentations, posters, and exhibits for this conference. The numerous individuals who participated in organizing the 2006 conference are listed below:
CONFERENCE PLANNING COMMITTEE CHAIRS
Linda Green, University of RI (M, V) Jeff Schloss, University of NH Chuck Spooner, USEPA (M) David Tucker, City of San José
CONFERENCE PLANNING COMMITTEE AND STAFF (includes abstract review/selection teams)
Mark Abramson, Heal the Bay (V) Donna Myers, USGS (M) Katherine Alben, NYS DOH (M) Amy Picotte, VT DEC (V) Mary Ambrose, TX CEQ (M) Jason Pinchback, TX Watch (V) Jacob Apodaca, LCRA (M, V) Dan Radulescu, LA Regional Water Quality Control Herb Brass, USEPA Board (M) Erick Burres, CA SWRCB (M, V) Kevin Richards, USGS Bob Carlson, Kent State University (M, V) Gary Rowe, USGS (M) Val Connor, CA SWRCB (M, V) Rob Schweinfurth, WEF Maggie Craig, Tetra Tech, Inc. (S) Kristine Stepenuck, University of WI/WI DNR (M, V) David Denig-Chakroff, Madison Water Utility Dan Sullivan, USGS (M) Bill Deutsch, AL Water Watch (V) Amy Wagner, USEPA Region 9 (V) Jerry Diamond, Tetra Tech, Inc. (M) Robert Ward, CO State University Gil Dichter, IDEXX Laboratories Candie Wilderman, ALLARM (M, V) Danielle Donkersloot, NJ DEP (M, V) Sandy Williamson, USGS (M) Eleanor Ely, The Volunteer Monitor (M, V) Rick Wilson, Surfrider Foundation (V) Laura Gabanski, USEPA Carol Winge, NALMS (S) Gia Grier, Tetra Tech, Inc. (S) David Wunsch, NH DES (M) Judy Griffin, USGS Eric Vowinkel, USGS Ingrid Harrald, Cook Inlet Keeper (M, V) Elizabeth Herron, University of RI (M, V) Additional logistical and onsite support staff Bridget Hoover, MBNMS (M, V) Jim Laine, WV DEP (M) Lynn Fan, Tetra Tech, Inc. Gail Mallard, USGS (M) Philip Forsberg, NALMS Abby Markowitz, Tetra Tech, Inc. (M, V, S) Erik Leppo, Tetra Tech, Inc. Alice Mayio, USEPA (M, V) Jennifer Pitt, Tetra Tech, Inc. Michael McDonald, USEPA (M) Brian Winge, NALMS
(M) Indicates Moderators and Workshop/Short Course Facilitators & Trainers (V) Indicates Special Volunteer Monitoring Sub-committee (S) Indicates Conference Staff
2006 National Monitoring Conference- San José, CA- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 17 ADDITIONAL MODERATORS & WORKSHOP/SHORT COURSE FACILITATORS & TRAINERS
LeAnne Astin, ICPRB Wayne Lapham, USGS Akin Babatola, City of Santa Cruz Fred Leslie, AL DEM Michael Barbour, Tetra Tech, Inc. John Mack, OH EPA Trudy Bennett, USGS Rob Malone, USDA Karen Blocksom, USEPA Ellen McCarron, FL DEP Mark Brigham, USGS Leslie McGeorge, NJ DEP Paul Capel, USGS Lester McKee, SFEI Ruth Chemerys, USEPA James Moring, USGS Ross Clark, CA Coastal Commission Mark Munn, USGS Chris Coburn, NOAA Mike Muse, USEPA Paul Currier, NH DES Bernard Nolan, USGS Lyle Cowles, USEPA Tony Olsen, USEPA Curtis Cude, OR DEQ Robin O’Malley, H. John Heinz III Center for Science Jay Davis, SFEI Charlie Peters, USGS Jessie Denver, City of San José Curtis Price, USGS Ryan Dupont, UT State University Teresa Rasmussen, USGS Don Dycus, TVA Andy Rehn, CA DFG Sandy Eberts, USGS Gayle Rominger, YSI Chris Faulkner, USEPA Ed Santoro, DRBC Jessica Franks, USEPA Ken Schiff, SCCWRP Jeff Frey, USGS Lynette Seigley, IA DNR Art Garceau, IN DEM Jeffrey Stam, USGS Jim Harrington, CA DFG John Stoddard, USEPA Jim Harrison, USEPA James Stribling, Tetra Tech, Inc. Chuck Hawkins, UT State University Ellen Tarquinio, USEPA Gretchen Hayslip, USEPA Cathy Tate, USGS Susan Holdsworth, USEPA Peter Tennant, ORSANCO Lauren Imgrund, ALLARM Ian Waite, USGS Susan Jackson, USEPA Joan Warren, USEPA Toni Johnson, USGS David Whitall, NOAA Revital Katznelson, CA SWRCB Dave Wolock, USGS Leon Kauffman, USGS Chris Yoder, Midwest Biodiversity Institute Phil Kaufman, USEPA Tamim Younos, Virginia Tech Rob Kent, Environment Canada Faith Zerbe, DE Riverkeeper Joseph Kerski, USGS Paula Zevin, USEPA Stephen Kraemer, USEPA Andy Ziegler, USGS Matthew Landon, USGS
2006 National Monitoring Conference- San José, CA- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 18 CONFERENCE EXHIBITORS
American Innovations Aquatic Informatics, Inc. *Astoria-Pacific International 12112 Technology, Ste 100 210-1050 Homer St. P.O. BOX 830 Austin, TX 78727 Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9 Clackamas, OR 97015 512.249.3400 or 800.229.3404 604.873.AQUA (2782) 503.657.3010 or 800.536.3111 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] http://www.amerinnovations.com/ http://www.aquaticinformatics.com/ http://www.astoria-pacific.com/splash.html
Bay Area Clean Water Agencies BioQuip Products *California State Water Resources http://www.bacwa.org/ 2321 Gladwick Street Control Board Rancho Dominguez, CA 90220 http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/ 310.667.8800
[email protected] http://www.bioquip.com/default.asp
Campbell Scientific, Inc. Chipotle Business Group, Inc. City of San Jose 815 W 1800 N 121 W. Park Row Drive http://www.ci.san-jose.ca.us/ Logan, UT 84321 Arlington, TX 76010 435.753.2342 [email protected] [email protected] http://www.campbellsci.com/index.cfm
Cooperative Institute for Coastal and *Eureka Environmental FTS Forest Technology Systems Ltd. Estuarine Environmental Technology 2113 Wells Branch Pkwy, Suite 4400 1065 Henry Eng Place University of New Hampshire Austin, Texas 78728 Victoria, BC Environmental Technology Building 512.302.4333 Canada V9B 6B2 35 Colovos Road [email protected] 800.548.4264 or 250.478.5561 Durham, NH 03824 http://www.eurekaenvironmental.com/ [email protected] http://ciceet.unh.edu/ http://www.ftsinc.com/
GFS Chemicals, Inc. Gold Systems, Inc. *Greenspan Analytical P.O. Box 245 3330 South 700 East 1195 Airport Rd Powell, OH 43065 Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 Lakewood, New Jersey 08701 877.534.0795 (U.S. and Canada) 801.485.7445 732.364.7800 740.881.5501 (International) http://www.goldsystems.com/ http://www.greenspan.com.au/ [email protected] http://www.gfschemicals.com/
*Ground Water Protection Council Hach Company Hydro Scientific West, Inc. 13308 N. MacArthur Blvd. P.O. Box 389 13135 Danielson Street, Suite #207 Oklahoma City, OK 73142 Loveland, Colorado 80539-0389 Poway, CA 92064 405.516.4972 800-227-4224 858.486.8825 http://www.gwpc.org/ http://www.hach.com/ [email protected] http://www.hydroscientificwest.com/
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. In-Situ, Inc. JBS Energy, Inc. One Idexx Drive 221 East Lincoln Ave. 311 D Street Westbrook, ME 04092 Fort Collins, CO 80524 West Sacramento, CA 95605 207.856.0300 or 800.548.6733 800.446.7488 or 970.498.1500 916.372.0534 http://www.idexx.com/index.jsp [email protected] [email protected] http://www.in-situ.com/ http://www.jbsenergy.com/
* This denotes those organizations that generously provided travel support for volunteer monitoring and watershed program coordinators.
2006 National Monitoring Conference - San José, CA- CONFERENCE EXHIBITORS 19 Lakes Consulting *LaMotte Company Methods & Data Comparability Board 42 Seabreeze Rd. P.O. Box 329 http://wi.water.usgs.gov/methods/ Devonport, Auckland 802 Washington Avenue New Zealand 1309 Chestertown, MD 21620 Ph/Fax (Int.) ++649-445-7561 410.778.3100 or 800.344.3100 [email protected] [email protected] http://www.lakewatch.net/ http://www.lamotte.com/ National Ground Water Association National Water Quality Monitoring NOAA National Centers for Coastal 601 Dempsey Road Council Ocean Science Westerville, OH 43081-8978 http://water.usgs.gov/wicp/acwi/monitoring/ 1305 East West Highway, Rm 8110 800.551.7379 or 614.898.7791 Silver Spring, MD 20910 [email protected] 301.713.3020 http://www.ngwa.org/ [email protected] http://www.nccos.noaa.gov/welcome.html ROM Communications, Inc. RTI International Schlumberger Water Services 12705 65th Street NW 701 13th Street NW, Ste 750 460 Phillip Street, Suite 101 Edmonton, A.B. Washington, DC 20005 Waterloo, Ontario CANADA, T5A 0Z4 202.728.2080 Canada N2L 5J2 877.860.3762 or 250.860.3762 http://www.rti.org/ 519.746.1798 [email protected] http://www.slb.com/content/services/additi http://www.romcomm.com/ onal/water/index.asp Solinst Canada, Ltd. Teledyne ISCO Teledyne RD Instruments 35 Todd Rd. 4700 Superior Street 9855 Businesspark Avenue Georgetown, Ontario Lincoln, NE 68504 San Diego, CA 92131-1101 Canada L7G 4R8 404.464.0231 or 800.228.4373 858.693.1178 800.661.2023 or 905.873.2255 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] http://www.isco.com/ http://www.rdinstruments.com/ http://www.solinst.com/index2.html Tennessee Valley Authority Tetra Tech, Inc US Environmental Protection Agency 1101 Market St. http://www.tetratech.com/ Environmental Technology Verification Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Program 423.751.0011 http://www.epa.gov/etv/index.html http://www.tva.gov/ US Environmental Protection US Environmental Protection Agency US Geological Survey Agency Office of Environmental Office of Water http://www.usgs.gov/ Information http://www.epa.gov/OW/index.html
5Hhttp://www.epa.gov/oei/ US Geological Survey US Geological Survey *USDA-CSREES Volunteer Water National Water-Quality Assessment NWISWeb Quality Monitoring National Program http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis Facilitation Project http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/ http://www.usawaterquality.org/volunteer/ Utility Systems Science & Software Water Environment Federation WET Labs 2101 E. 4th Street, Suite 130A http://www.wef.org/Home P.O. Box 518 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Philomath, OR 97370 714.542.1004 541.929.5650 [email protected] [email protected] http://www.uscubed.com/usss/ http://www.wetlabs.com/index.html YSI, Inc. 1725 Brannum Lane Yellow Springs, OH 45387 937.767.7241 [email protected] http://www.ysi.com/index.html
* This denotes those organizations that generously provided travel support for volunteer monitoring and watershed program coordinators.
2006 National Monitoring Conference - San José, CA- CONFERENCE EXHIBITORS 20 2006 NATIONAL MONITORING CONFERENCE AGENDA
Sunday, May 7 8:00 - 1:00; Field Trip: USGS Polaris Research Vessel Cruises - morning and afternoon trips (Meet at main entrance to Convention Center on 1st floor) 12:00 - 5:00 9:00 - 4:00 Field Trip: Monterey Aquarium & “Walk ‘n Talk” with the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (Meet at main entrance to Convention Center on 1st floor) 10:00 - 3:00 Field Trip: Roaring Camp Railroad (Meet at main entrance to Convention Center on 1st floor) 12:00 - 5:00 Registration in Ballroom Concourse 12:00 - 7:00 Exhibitor Set-Up (Exhibit Hall 1)
Monday, May 8 7:00 - 8:00 Breakfast in Exhibit Hall 1, Registration in Ballroom Concourse Meeting Room C2 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room C1 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room C3 Meeting Room C4 Concurrent WORKSHOP: Words WORKSHOP: Critical WORKSHOP: Data to SHORT COURSE: As- WORKSHOP: Using U.S. WORKSHOP: Prob- and Water Quality: Elements of a Bioas- Action: Empowering sessing Ground Water Geological Survey ability Survey Design Session A Effective Communica- sessment Program Citizens through the Vulnerability through Spatial Data to Ana- for Aquatic Resources tion Through Better for State & Tribal Acquisition and Under- Statistical and Mecha- lyze Water Quality using R Statistical 8:00 - 10:30 Publications Monitoring standing of Monitoring nistic Methods Software Data Facilitators: Curtis Price, Facilitators: Eleanor Ely, Facilitators: Michael Trainers: Sandy Eberts, Joseph Kerski, and Facilitator: Tony Olsen, The Volunteer Monitor; Barbour, Tetra Tech, Inc.; Facilitators: Candie Leon Kauffman, Bernard Sandy Williamson, USGS USEPA Abby Markowitz, Tetra Chris Yoder, Midwest Wilderman and Lauren Nolan, Matthew Landon, Tech, Inc. Biodiversity Institute Imgrund, ALLARM; and Jeffrey Starn, USGS; Faith Zerbe, Delaware Stephen Kraemer and Riverkeeper Mike Muse, USEPA; Rob Malone, USDA 10:30 - 11:00 Break - Refreshments in Exhibit Hall 1 11:00 - 12:30 Opening Plenary and EJF Award Presentation (Ballrooms A1, 2, 7, 8)
Welcome to the 2006 National Monitoring Conference, David Tucker, Conference Chair Welcome to San José: Capital of Silicon Valley, John Stufflebean, Director, Environmental Services, City of San Jose Introduction to the 2006 Conference, Linda Green, Conference Chair The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries, Charles Spooner & Gail Mallard, NWQMC Co-Chairs Keynote Speaker - Monitoring Networks: Connecting for Clean Water, Mr. Terry Tamminen, Special Assistant to the Governor of California Presentation of the Elizabeth J. Fellows Award, Linda Green, Conference Chair Charge to Conference Participants, Jeffrey Schloss, Conference Chair 12:30 - 1:30 Lunch in Exhibit Hall 1
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 21 Monday, May 8 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room C2 Meeting Room C4 Meeting Room C3 Meeting Room C1 Concurrent Measurement Perfor- Perspectives on Monitoring & Manag- Use of Ancillary Data Monitoring in the Pesticides in Midwest- Using & Developing WORKSHOP: Getting mance I: Program- the Nation’s Water ing Ground Water and GIS Tools to Inter- Shadow of the Golden ern Streams: Monitor- WQ Indices Started in Volunteer Session B wide Considerations Quality: Findings, Resources at Multiple pret Water Quality Gate ing Strategies & Recent Monitoring Implications, & Future Scales Results Moderator: Curtis Cude 1:30 - 3:00 Moderator: Karen Directions I Moderator: Curtis Price Moderator: Jessie Facilitators: Linda Green, Blocksom Moderator: David Denver Moderator: Lyle Cowles URI Watershed Watch; Moderator: Robin Wunsch Danielle Donkersloot, O’Malley NJ Watershed Watch Network 1:35 - 1:55 Elements for a Suc- Pesticides in the The Fall and Rise of an Characterizing Sustaining a Re- Glyphosate concentra- Creative Outreach: cessful Low-Level Nation’s Streams Aquifer—Stakeholders the Landscape for gional Water Quality tions in various hydro- Solving the Conun- National Scale VOC and Ground Water, Unite to Conserve and Water-Quality Data Monitoring Program: logical compartments drum of Using Vol- Assessment, David 1992-2001, Rob- Monitor the Sparta Analysis: Methods and The Lessons from of a small watershed unteer Water Quality Bender, USGS ert Gilliom, USGS Aquifer in South Ar- Implementation, Curtis San Francisco Bay, in east-central Indiana, Data as a Meaningful kansas, David Freiwald, Price, USGS Michael Connor, San Nancy Baker, USGS Source of Information, USGS Francisco Estuary Amanda Ross, Lower Institute Colorado River Authority, Colorado River Watch Network 1:55 - 2:15 Lessons Learned in Nutrients in the Proposed Na- Characterizing the Monitoring metals in Monitoring Pesticides Anthropogenic National Park Service Nation’s Streams and tional Ground Water Landscape for Water- San Francisco Bay: in Iowa’s Waters, Mary Impacts to Fish As- Vital Signs Long Term Groundwater, 1992- Monitoring Program, Quality Assessment: Quantification of tem- Skopec, IA Dept. of semblages in Northern Monitoring Program, 2001, Neil Dubrovsky, Beverly Herzog, Illinois Linking tabular county poral variations from Natural Resources New Jersey Streams, Roy Irwin, National Park USGS State Geological Survey data on agricultural hours to decades, Ar- Leslie McGeorge, NJ Service nutrient and pesticide thur Flegal, University of Dept. of Environmental applications to spatial CA, Santa Cruz Protection land cover data to esti- mate nutrient and pesti- cide use in watersheds and ground water study areas, Gail Thelin, USGS 2:15 - 2:35 Meeting Program- The National Coastal The Need for Renewed The use of remotely- Science, consen- Assessment of Effects of hydrologic matic Data Quality Assessment: Results, Emphasis on State, sensed and GIS-derived sus and monitoring Nutrients and Selected factors on ecological Objectives through a Lessons Learned and Tribal and Federal variables to character- strategies: the art of Organic contaminants conditions of streams Standardized Verifica- Future Directions, Ground-Water Protec- ize urbanization in the revising a long-term in Small Streams in in the northeast- tion and Validation Kevin Summers, USEPA tion Programs, Mike National Water-Quality benthic monitoring the Midwestern United ern United States, System and Data Wireman, USEPA Region Assessment program, program, Heath- States, 2004, James Jonathan Kennen, USGS Management, Beverly 8 James Falcone, USGS er Peterson, CA Dept. of Stark, USGS van Buuren, San Jose Water Resources State University Founda- tion, Moss Landing Marine Labs 2:35 - 2:55 Challenges of Con- Perspectives on the Developing a Ground StreamStats: A Web- Adapting an Ambient Trends in diazinon and Assessment of ducting Analytical State of the Nation’s Water Monitoring based application Monitoring Program other urban pesticides Aquatic Biological Chemistry in Environ- Waters, Robin O’Malley, Strategy for Half the for estimating basin to the Challenge of in stream samples from Communities along a mental Matrices or The H. John Heinz III Cost - Literally, David characteristics and Managing Emerging the northeastern United Gradient of Urbaniza- Why is my Blank not Center for Science, Wunsch, New Hampshire streamflows, Alan Rea, Pollutants in the San States, 1993-2004, tion in the Willamette Blank?, Meg Sedlak, Economics and the Geological Survey USGS Francisco Estuary, Patrick Phillips, USGS Valley Ecoregion and a San Francisco Estuary Environment Rainer Hoenicke, San Predictive Application Institute Francisco Estuary to Unsampled Sites, Institute Ian Waite, USGS Oregon Water Science Center 3:00 - 3:30 Break - Refreshments in Exhibit Hall 1
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 22 Monday, May 8 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room C2 Meeting Room C4 Meeting Room C3 Meeting Room C1 Concurrent Measurement Per- Perspectives on Monitoring Drinking Designing Watershed Innovative Approach- Making it Work: De- Seeing Your Way SHORT COURSE: Statis- formance II: Field & the Nation’s Water Water & Sources of Assessments es for Developing signing Your Volunteer Through Turbidity tical Tools for Support- Session C Analytical Assess- Quality: Findings, Supply Nutrient TMDLs Monitoring Strategy Monitoring ing the Development ment Implications, & Future Moderator: LeAnne Astin of a Multi Metric Index 3:30 - 5:00 Directions II Moderator: Gil Dichter Moderator: Jim Laine Moderator: Bridget Hoover Moderator: Faith Zerbe (MMI) for Macroinver- Moderator: Tamim tebrate Communities Younos Moderator: Donna Myers Trainer: John Stoddard, USEPA 3:35 - 3:55 Uncertainty in Mea- A National Surveil- Water quality monitor- Critical Evaluation of The Northeast AVG- Designing Your Moni- Water Quality Impair- sured Streamflow and lance Study on ing of the Cambrian- Waterbody Assess- WLF: A Watershed toring Plan: Linking ment from Roadway Water Quality Data Priority Pesticides Ordovician aquifer ment Processes, Scale Model to Citizen Monitoring and Run-off: Character- for Small Watersheds, in Canadian Aquatic system in Iowa and Lindsay Griffith, Brown and predict Sediment and Data Use, Angie Becker izing Fine Particles, Daren Harmel, USDA Ecosystems, Janine Illinois, Kimber- Caldwell Nutrient Transport, Re- Kudelka, Minnesota Peter Green, University of ARS Murray, Environment lee Barnes, USGS becca Weidman, New Waters California, Davis Canada, National Water England Interstate Water Research Institute Pollution Control Com- mission 3:55 - 4:15 Automated Valida- Trends in Metals Assessment of Shal- Whatever Happened Modeling to Support The Nuts and Bolts of A Comparison of tion and Grading of and Hydrophobic low Ground-Water to Pollution Surveys? the Development of a Volunteer Monitoring Ocular Turbidity In- Aquatic Time Series Organic Contami- Quality in Agricultural The Case for Intensive Nutrient TMDLs in Day, Diane Cross, South struments for Shallow Using a Probabilistic nants in Urban and and Urban Areas With- River Segment Survey Baltimore Harbor, Yuba River Citizens League Waters, Robert Carlson, Parity Space Method, Reference Lake in the Arid and Semi- Designs, Chris Yoder, Miao-Li Chang, MD Kent State University Touraj Faramand, Sediments Across the arid Western United Midwest Biodiversity In- Dept. of the Environment Aquatic Informatics Inc. United States, 1970 to States, Angela Paul, NV stitute 2001, Peter Van Metre, Water Science Center USGS 4:15 - 4:35 Pre-mobilization Volatile Organic Development of a Combining Dynamic Nutrient TMDLs for The Study Design - The Transparency tube Error Checks of Compounds in Ground Source Water Quality Assessments with the Cahaba River Wa- Game Plan Behind as a surrogate for Multi-parameter Field Water and Drink- Monitoring Protocol Traditional Monitoring tershed, Chris Johnson, Successful Monitor- turbidity and suspend Instruments: One Way ing-Water Supply for First Nations in Approaches to Improve AL Dept. of Environmen- ing Strategies and solids in rivers and of Promoting Service- Wells, John Zogorski, Canada, Rob Phillips, Understanding of NPS tal Management Effective Data Use, reservoirs, Nicole Reid, wide Consistency USGS Environment Canada Pollution Impacts, Cheryl Snyder, PA Dept. Michigan State Univer- in a Water Quality William Stringfellow, of Environmental Protec- sity Extension Monitoring Program, University of the Pacific tion Peter Penoyer, National Park Service 4:35 - 4:55 RPD Between Suc- Assessing the Application of filtra- Introducing NHDPlus! Supporting nutrient Monitoring - Just Do IT, Gaining Clarity on cessive Measure- Ecological Conditions tion-based lumines- – A Tool for Watershed criteria development Baywatchers: 14 years, Transparency Mea- ment: A Simple But of the Great Rivers cence method for Planning, Richard Moore, nationwide: Web QA data, Improved surements, Jeffrey Neglected Tool for of the Central United rapid monitoring of USGS application & Techni- understanding, Being Schloss, University of Assessing Monitoring States, Brian Hill, USEPA microbial contamina- cal REQuest System creative. The Coalition New Hampshire Coop- Well Data Quality, tion in water, Carmen (T-REQS), Jeroen Ger- for Buzzards Bay erative Extension Bruce Castle, Erler & Dumas, Ann Arbor Water ritsen, Tetra Tech, Inc. Citizen’s Water Quality Kalinowski, Inc. Treatment Service Unit Monitoring Program, Tony Williams, The Coali- tion for Buzzards Bay 5:00 - 7:00 Exhibit and Poster Reception (Exhibit Hall 1) This reception will kick off the networking with our long list of outstanding Exhibitors and Sponsors. This is also a prime opportunity to visit with our Poster Presenters.
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 23 Tuesday, May 9 7:00 - 8:00 Breakfast in Exhibit Hall 1, Registration in Ballroom Concourse Meeting Room A1 Meeting Room A2 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room A7 Meeting Room C3 Concurrent The National Water Tiered Aquatic Life Making the Connec- Monitoring to Meet Evaluating the Effects Making it Work: Monitoring BMPs: SHORT COURSE: Uses Quality Monitoring Uses: Conceptual tions Between Surface Many Objectives of Agriculture on Starting & Sustaining Baselines & Strate- of Real-Time Data: Ca- Session D Network for U.S. Models & Develop- and Ground Water Water Quality I Volunteer Monitoring gies to Assess Resto- pabilities, Limitations, Coastal Waters and ment Strategies Moderator: Joan Warren Programs ration Efforts Applications, Costs, & 8:00 - 9:30 their Tributaries Moderator: Gil Dichter Moderator: Paul Capel Benefits Moderator: Susan Moderator: Erick Burres Moderator: Lester Session Topic: Jackson McKee Trainers: Andy Ziegler, Integrating Atmospheric Trudy Bennett, and Teresa Deposition Rasmussen, USGS 8:05 - 8:25 Connecting atmo- The Biological Making the Connec- South Carolina Surface Transport of Agri- What the Heron Sees, Effects of Multi- spheric deposition to Condition Gradi- tions Between Surface Water Monitoring: Dif- cultural Chemicals: Jean-Ann Moon, Marshall scale Environmental coastal water quality, ent and Tiered Water and Ground ferent Designs for Dif- Mass Budget County Retired and Senior Characteristics on Hans Paerl, UNC Chapel Aquatic Life Uses, Water, Pixie Hamilton, ferent Objectives, David Approach, Kathleen Mc- Volunteer Program Agricultural Stream Hill Susan Davies, State of USGS Chestnut, SC Dept. of Carthy, USGS Biota in the Midwest- Maine Health and Environmental ern USA, Julie Berkman, Control USGS 8:25 - 8:45 Strategy for linking Rule-based models Importance of Key Considerations in Transport of Agri- Communication is Protocols for the Eval- the atmospheric for uniform as- ground-water flow and Monitoring Design, Lyle cultural Chemicals: Key to Sustaining uating the Effects of deposition network to sessments on the travel time on nitrogen Cowles, USEPA Region 7 Atmosphere to Land Long-Term Volunteer Land-use Patterns and the proposed national Biological Condition loading from an agri- Surface, Michael Ma- Water Quality Monitor- Runoff Management water quality monitor- Gradient, Jeroen Gerrit- cultural basin in Con- jewski, USGS ing Programs, Jacob on Urban Streams, ing network, Mark sen, Tetra Tech, Inc. necticut, John Mullaney, Apodaca, Lower Colorado Christine Rohrer, Colo- Nilles, USGS USGS River Authority rado State University 8:45 - 9:05 Atmospheric mercury ADEM’s Monitoring Predicting the Occur- Water quality monitor- Transport of Agri- Involving Volun- Assessing Rain monitoring: existing Strategy for Streams rence of Nutrients and ing designs for multiple cultural Chemicals: teers Beyond Water Garden Effectiveness, framework and tech- and Rivers: Develop- Pesticides during Base objectives and spatial Tile drains to surface Monitoring, Gayla Stock, Brooke Asleson, Univer- nical challenges, TBN ment and Testing Flow in Nontidal Head- scales: an evaluation water, Wesley Stone, Houston-Galveston Area sity of Minnesota of a Human Distur- water Streams of the based on detection of USGS Water Resources Council bance Gradient in Mid-Atlantic Coastal expected and actual Division the Alabama, Coosa, Plain, Anne Neale, impairment, John Hunt, and Tallapoosa River USEPA ORD NERL University of California, Basins, Lisa Huff, AL Davis Dept. of Environmental Management 9:05 - 9:25 Open discussion facili- Key Issues and Hydrologic controls on Essentials of specifi- Pesticide and nutrient Capture, care Open discussion and tated by David Whitall, Underlying Concepts nutrient and pesticide cation of information behavior in a karst and feeding of Q&A NOAA in Use Attainability transport through needs, Jos G. Timmer- watershed located in volunteers, Dwight Hol- Analyses for Aquatic a small agricultural man, Institute for Inland southeastern Minne- ford, Upper Putah Creek Life Designated Uses, watershed, Morgan Water Management and sota, Paul Wotzka, MN Stewardship Chris Yoder, Midwest Creek, Maryland, USA, Waste Water Treatment Dept. of Agriculture Biodiversity Institute Michael Brayton, USGS (RIZA) 9:30 - 10:30 Quick Break (refreshments in Exhibit Hall 1) followed by Poster & Exhibit viewing
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 24 Tuesday, May 9 Meeting Room A1 Meeting Room A2 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room A7 Meeting Room C3 Concurrent Strength in Numbers: An Overview of the Assessing Ground Remote Sensing & GIS- Evaluating the Effects Assessing Coastal E. coli: Comparability WORKSHOP: Building Monitoring Councils National Wadeable Water Vulnerability Enhanced Monitoring & of Agriculture on Watersheds of Methods & Rapid Credibility: Quality Session E at Work Streams Assessment Through Mechanistic Analysis Water Quality II Detection Assurance & Quality Methods I Moderator: Mike Mc- Control for Volunteer 10:30–12:00 Moderator: Charlie Moderator: Susan Moderator: Jim Harrison Moderator: Paul Capel Donald Moderator: Eleanor Ely Monitoring Programs Peters Holdsworth Moderator: Wayne Lapham Facilitators: Elizabeth Herron, URI Watershed Watch; Ingrid Harrald, 10:35 - 10:55 The Pacific North- National Stream and Proposed Tools and Using the National Transport of Agri- Nitrogen and Phos- Comparing E. coli Cook Inlet Keeper west Aquatic Moni- River Assessment Approach for Ground- Hydrography Dataset cultural Chemicals: phorus Loadings to the Results Analyzed by toring Partnership: A Monitoring Design, Water Vulnerability Plus for drainage area Unsaturated Zone to Neuse and Pamlico Colilert® and Mem- Forum For Regional Anthony Olsen, USEPA Assessment Using a delineation and site Ground Water to Sur- River Estuaries, North brane Filtration Tech- Coordination, Jennifer NHEERL Geographic Informa- matching, Kirsten Cass- face Water, San Joa- Carolina, Jerad Bales, niques, Samuel Dinkins, Bayer, USGS tion System and ingham, USGS NC Water quin Valley, California, USGS Ohio River Valley Water Simulation Modeling, Science Center Joseph Domagalski, Sanitation Commission Jack Barbash, USGS USGS 10:55 - 11:15 Interagency Monitor- Defining Least-Im- Basin-scale assess- New NHD Tools for Linking Ground Water Monitoring Wetlands in Volunteer Monitoring ing Coordination: The pacted Reference ment of transport of the Evaluation of Age and Chemistry California, Joshua Col- of E. coli in Upper Oregon Plan Monitor- Condition for the water and agricultural Watershed Condition Data Along Flow lins, San Francisco Estuary Midwest Streams: A ing Team, Gregory National Wadeable chemicals through and Management Paths: Implications Institute Comparison of Meth- Pettit, OR Dept. of Streams Assessment, the unsaturated zone, Performance, William for Trends and Trans- ods and Preferences, Environmental Quality Alan Herlihy, Oregon Richard Webb, USGS Cooter, RTI International formations of Nutri- Kristine Stepenuck, State University ents and Pesticides, University of WI-Exten- Anthony Tesoriero, USGS sion, WI Dept. of Natural Resources 11:15 - 11:35 Development of Process for develop- Conceptual Frame- GIS and Remote Sens- Transport of Agri- Assessing the Health of Development of Rapid the Florida Water ing a Macroinver- work for evaluating ing Applications In The cultural Chemicals: National Park Service QPCR Approaches for Resource Monitor- tebrate Index of the impact of inactive Hydropolitics of Sub- Estimating Lag Times Southeast Coastal Wa- Measurement of E. ing Atlas, Joe King, FL Biotic Integrity for the wells on commu- Saharan Africa: The in Different Hydro- ters Using the United coli and Enterococ- Dept. of Environmental Wadeable Streams nity water supplies, Case of Multinational logic Environments, States Environmental cus in Environmental Protection Assessment, John Rick Johnson, Oregon Management of River David Wolock, USGS Protection Agency’s Waters: The Future Stoddard, USEPA Health & Science Uni- Niger Basin of West National Coastal As- for Routine Monitor- versity Africa, Edmund Merem, sessment Protocols, ing?, Rachel Noble, UNC Jackson State University Joe DeVivo, National Park Chapel Hill Service 11:35 - 11:55 Sustaining Long Term National Assessment Comparison of intrinsic Incorporating remote Effective Policy Based NOAA’s National IMS/ATP rapid method Regional Coordinated of the Condition of susceptibility of sensing into an ambient on Sparse Data: Estuarine Research for the determination Monitoring Programs, Wadeable Streams public-supply wells to monitoring strategy, TMDLs in the San Reserve’s System of E. coli concentra- Todd Running, Houston- in the Conterminous contamination among Mary Anne Nelson, ID Joaquin River Basin, Wide-Monitoring Pro- tions in recreational Galveston Area Council U.S., Steven Paulsen, selected regional aqui- Dept. of Environmental California, Leslie Grob- gram: Over 10 years of waters, Rebecca USEPA fer systems, Leon Kauff- Quality er, CA Regional Water developing capabilities, Bushon, USGS man, USGS Quality Control Board, applications, and ex- Central Valley Region pansions, Susan White, NOAA National Estuarine Research Reserve 12:00 - 1:30 Lunch in Exhibit Hall 1
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 25 Tuesday, May 9 Meeting Room A1 Meeting Room A2 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room A7 Meeting Room C3 Concurrent The National Water Evaluating the Effects Assessing Ground Real-Time Monitoring I: State Experiences in Assuring Credible Stormwater Monitor- WORKSHOP: Bioas- Quality Monitoring of Urbanization on Water Vulnerability Applications & Program Probabilistic Monitor- Volunteer Data ing: When It Rains It sessment Method Session F Network for U.S. Water Quality I Through Mechanistic Case Studies ing Pours Performance and Coastal Waters and Methods II Moderator: Jim Harrington Comparability, Part 1 1:30–3:00 their Tributaries Moderator: Ian Waite Moderator: Tamim Younos Moderator: Art Garceau Moderator: Dan Rad- Moderator: Wayne ulescu Facilitators: Laura Session Topic: Estuar- Lapham Gabanski, USEPA; Jerry ies—Water Quality Diamond, Tetra Tech, Inc. Monitoring in San Francisco Bay 1:35 - 1:55 Estuaries component Effects of Urban- Application of Ground Integrating a Con- Pennsylvania’s Ap- QA/QC and QAPP: How First Flush Volunteers of the Network, ization on Stream Water Dating Tech- tinuous Water Quality plication of Probabil- to get professional Do it in the Dark, Bridg- Jawed Hameedi, NOAA Ecosystems: niques for Evaluating Monitoring Network ity-Based Sampling, quality data from a et Hoover, Monterey Overview and Study the Susceptibil- into Texas’ Surface Wa- Tony Shaw, PA Dept. of volunteer program, Bay National Marine Design of the U.S. ity of Aquifers and ter Quality Monitoring Environmental Protection Ingrid Harrald, Cook Inlet Sanctuary Geological Survey’s Public-Supply Wells Program, Jill Csekitz, TX Keeper Urban Stream Studies, to Contamination, Commission on Environ- Cathy Tate, USGS Sandra Eberts, USGS mental Quality 1:55 - 2:15 Lessons from three Ecological responses Evaluating uncertainty Continuous in-stream Probabilistic What is Represen- Monitoring of prior- decades of monitoring of streams to urban- in areas contributing monitoring to measure Monitoring in Virginia: tativeness, and Why ity toxic pollutants in in San Francisco Bay, ization: A review of recharge to wells for and estimate water- Experiences from are We Confused?, Highway Stormwater James Cloern, USGS results from the U.S. water-quality network quality concentrations, the First Five Years, Revital Katznelson, CA Runoff, Peter Green, Geological Survey’s design, Jeffrey Starn, densities, and loads, Lawrence Willis, VA State Water Resources University of California, urban streams stud- USGS Andrew Ziegler, USGS Dept. of Environmental Control Board Davis ies, Thomas Cuffney, Quality USGS 2:15 - 2:35 San Francisco Bay Identifying the Use of Multiple Trac- A Real-Time Water Idaho’s experience Evaluation of the New Monitoring and Regional Monitoring changes to stream ers and Geochemical Quality Monitoring with random design York City Watershed Analytical Issues For Program, Jay Davis, condition caused by Modeling to Assess Network for Investigat- using NHD: intermit- Hudson Basin River BMP Performance San Francisco Estuary urbanization, and Vulnerability of a Pub- ing the Strengths and tent streams and Watch Volunteer Moni- Evaluation, Hong Lin, Institute how modeling the re- lic Supply Well in the Weaknesses of Exist- other considerations, toring Pilot Project, CDS Technologies sponses can be used Karstic Upper Floridan ing Monitoring Tech- Mary Anne Nelson, ID Heather Clark Dantzker, to improve ecological Aquifer, Brian Katz, niques, David Stevens, Dept. of Environmental The Community Science risk characterizations, USGS Utah State University Quality Institute, Inc., Cornell James Coles, USGS University 2:35 - 2:55 Open discussion Modeling Urban Depth-Dependent Monitoring Surface- Utility Of Probability- Experiences in monitor- Evaluation of water facilitated by TBN Landscape Patterns Sampling to Determine Water-Quality in the Based Survey Design ing, Eric Russell, Surfrider quality monitoring and their Effects on Source Areas and Tongue River Water- for Tracking Fish Foundation data at the local level, Aquatic Ecosystems, Short-Circuit Pathways shed of Montana and Species of Interest, a reality check, Jeff Marina Alberti, University for Contaminants to Wyoming, Stacy Kinsey, Matt Combes, MO Dept. Hieronymus, Charlotte of Washington Reach Public Supply USGS of Conservation Storm Water Services Wells, High Plains Aquifer, York, Nebras- ka, Matthew Landon, USGS 3:00 - 3:30 Break - Refreshments in Exhibit Hall 1
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 26 Tuesday, May 9 Meeting Room A1 Meeting Room A2 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room A7 Meeting Room C3 Concurrent Monitoring for the Evaluating the Effects Assessing Ground Harnessing the Beast: Monitoring for Trends States & Volunteers: Monitoring Algae: WORKSHOP: Bioas- Prevention & Cleanup of Urbanization on Water Vulnerability Managing Complex Partnerships that Work Tracking Trends, sessment Method Session G of Toxics Water Quality II through Mechanistic Data Sets Moderator: Tony Olsen Toxins, & Food Web Performance and Methods III Moderator: Alice Mayio Dynamics Comparability, Part 2 3:30–5:00 Moderator: Ed Santoro Moderator: Cathy Tate Moderator: Ellen Mc- Moderator: Ryan Dupont Carron Moderator: Fred Leslie Facilitators: Laura Gabanski, USEPA; Jerry Diamond, Tetra Tech, Inc. 3:35 - 3:55 Monitoring mercury in You’re standing on it! Groundwater Age as a Arkansas Monitoring The Regional Ken- The Vermont Lay Spatial and tempo- biosentinel fish in San Parking lot sealcoat Predictive Tool for Wa- Data Assessment Pro- dall Test for Trend, Monitoring Program: ral trends of algal Francisco Bay, Ben and urban PAHs, ter Quality Monitoring, gram (AMDAP) Using Dennis Helsel, USGS Afloat For 26 Years!, biomass in small and Greenfield, San Fran- Barbara Mahler, USGS Jean Moran, Lawrence the Segment Evaluation Amy Picotte, VT Agency large streams in cisco Estuary Institute Livermore National Spreadsheet (SEGEVAL. of Natural Resources Indiana, 2001-04, Laboratory XLS), Jessica Franks, Jeffrey Frey, USGS USEPA Region 6 3:55 - 4:15 Recovery and City of Austin bio- Simulation of Short Managing Monitoring Water Quality Trends Using Citizen Monitor- Influences of Stream Monitoring Chal- logical studies on the Circuit Flow Paths Data from Many Sourc- Along the Central ing Bioassessment and Size in Determin- lenges with Water toxicity and effects of and Transient Condi- es: A New Hampshire Coast of California, Water Quality Data to ing Nutrient Criteria Quality Issues in coal tar sealants on tions to Understand Experience, Deb Soule, Marc Los Huertos, Obtain Impaired Wa- for Streams in the New Orleans during stream communities, Vulnerability of Public NH Dept. of Environmental University of CA, Santa tershed Status, Joanne Eastern Corn Belt Hurricane Katrina Mateo Scoggins, City of Supply Wells to Con- Services Cruz Hild, Friends of Deer Creek Plains Ecoregion, Recovery Operations, Austin tamination in the High Brian Caskey, USGS William Roper, George Plains Aquifer, York, Mason University Nebraska, Brian Clark, USGS 4:15 - 4:35 The Regional Bypass Assessing the Effects GAMA Special Studies Expanding Water Lessons Learned The Oregon DEQ Algal pigments in WorkGroup—A Suc- of Urban Land Use on on Nitrate in Cali- Quality Assessments from Monitoring Volunteer Monitoring benthic organisms and cessful Application of Stream Ecosystems: fornia Groundwater, beyond the Realm Compliance with a Program: Managing fish: development of Water Quality Predic- Integrating Chem- Bradley Esser, Lawrence of ‘Impairments’ and Phosphorus Standard and Applying Data biomarkers to trace tion and Interagency istry, Toxicity Test, Livermore National into a Tool Useful to in the Florida Ever- Generated Within a food-web relation- Communication, and CYP1A1 Gene Laboratory Watershed Managers glades and Assessing Grassroots Framework, ships, Katherine Alben, Charles Dujardin, Hydro- Activation Data from at the Local Level, the Linkage between Steve Hanson, OR Dept. of NY State Dept. of Health Qual, Inc. Extracts of Semiper- Ken Edwardson, State of Phosphorus Control Environmental Quality meable Membrane New Hampshire and Marsh Water Devices, Wade Bryant, Quality, Garth Redfield, USGS South FL Water Manage- ment District 4:35 - 4:55 Combining prediction Pesticides in urban Understanding agricul- Vital Signs Water Qual- Wisconsin’s Surface New Jersey’s Answer Screening for Algal and monitoring for settings—Use of ture-related trends in ity Data Management Water Quality to Multiple Volunteer Toxins in Volunteer- reduction of toxics: a Pesticide Toxic- ground-water quality in the National Park Monitoring Program, Data Sources, Danielle Monitored Lakes, the Lake Michigan ity Index to evaluate in the Western Lake Service, Dean Tucker, Kenneth Schreiber, Donkersloot, NJ Dept. of Gene Williams, Snohom- Mass Balance Study, potential toxicity of Michigan Drainages, National Park Service WI Dept. of Natural Environmental Protection ish County Public Works Glenn Warren, USEPA stream water samples Wisconsin, David Saad, Resources Dept. to macroinverte- USGS brates, Karen Riva-Mur- ray, USGS
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 27 Tuesday, May 9 5:15 - ? Special Session on National Ground Water Monitoring (Meeting Room A1) The purpose of this brainstorming session is to discuss the formation of a work group to help develop a consistent, nationwide monitoring and assessment program leading to an accurate estimation of ground water stored volume, availability, and sustainability. We will focus on defining the need for coordinated national ground water monitoring and developing recommendations for the planning and initial implementation of such monitoring. See strawman document at http://water.usgs.gov/wicp/acwi/monitoring/workgroups/wci/ 5:15 - 6:30 Volunteer Monitoring Coordinators Meeting (Meeting Room C1) Discussion leaders: Linda Green, USDA-CSREES National Facilitation of Volunteer Monitoring and Alice Mayio, U.S. EPA
This informal meeting is to encourage discussion and networking among volunteer monitoring coordinators. What’s working in the world of volunteer monitoring, what needs more work, and where are we headed? Share some examples of your program successes, challenges, needs and desires! 6:30 - ? Gathering of Volunteer Monitoring Coordinators -- location TBA 7:00 - 9:00 Panel Discussion: Effects of Urbanization on Streams (Meeting Room A8) Facilitator: Cathy Tate, USGS National Water-Quality Assessment Program
This panel discussion will build upon earlier technical sessions on “Evaluating the Effects of Urbanization on Water Quality I & II” and will include 5 to 6 panelists who will provide perspectives on urban water-quality studies that represent the diverse interests of conference attendees. A brief introductory discussion by panel members will be followed by a general Q&A period. We will focus on the following questions: 1) Urban designs...what’s worked, what hasn’t?; 2) What types of data are being collected, what data are most useful in assessing the effects of urbanization on stream quality?; 3) Which data or information are most useful to planners, regulators, and watershed groups, and how is data from urban water quality studies being used by stakeholders?
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 28 Wednesday, May 10 7:00 - 8:00 Breakfast in Exhibit Hall 1, Registration in Ballroom Concourse Meeting Room A1 Meeting Room A2 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room A7 Meeting Room C3 Concurrent The National Water Improving Data Cooperative Regional Perspectives on the Effects of Urbaniza- Making it Work: Bioassessment WORKSHOP: Statistical Quality Monitoring Management and Monitoring in Cali- Nation’s Water Quality: tion on Water Quality: Effectively Training Method Comparability Analysis of Probability Session H Network for U.S. Exchange fornia Findings, Implications, Case Studies Volunteer Monitors & Performance Survey Data Using R Coastal Waters and & Future Directions III Statistical Software, 8:00–9:30 their Tributaries Moderator: Rob Kent Moderator: Ken Schiff Moderator: James Moderator: Paula Zevin Moderators: Jerry Dia- Part 1 Moderator: Ellen Tarquinio Moring mond, Laura Gabanski Session Topic: Large Riv- Facilitator: Tony Olsen, ers Monitoring Network USEPA 8:05 - 8:25 Rivers Component Water Quality Data Inventory of Ocean Water quality monitor- Comparing flow Georgia Adopt A Comparable Biological of the Monitoring Elements (WQDE): Monitoring in the ing and assessment variability in urban Stream Coastal Region Assessments From Network, Jared Bales, Enhancing compara- Southern California of global change, streams across envi- Training Center at Different Methods and USGS bility of monitoring Bight, Stephen Weis- Richard Robarts, UNEP ronmental settings, Savannah State Univer- Analyses, David Herbst, information, LeAnne burg, Southern California GEMS/Water Programme Elise Giddings, USGS NC sity, Joseph Richardson, University of CA Astin, Interstate Com- Coastal Water Research Water Science Center Savannah State University mission on the Potomac Project River Basin 8:25 - 8:45 Upper Mississippi Water Quality Ex- Southern California Evaluating the Po- A tale of two streams: The Importance of Pacific Northwest River monitoring, Mary change WQX: EPA’s Bight Regional Marine tential Human-Health Chemical and Professionally Training side-by-side protocol Skopec, IA Dept. of new look at Water Monitoring Program, Relevance of Volatile physical character- Citizen Monitors in comparison test, Natural Resources Quality Data Manage- Kenneth Schiff, Southern Organic Compounds in istics of secondary Building, Promoting and Steve Lanigan, USFS/ ment, Kristen Gunthardt, California Coastal Water Samples from Domes- tributaries in an arid Implementing a State- BLM USEPA Office of Water Research Project tic and Public Wells urban watershed and Wide Bioassessment in the United States, potential impacts on Program in California, Patricia Toccalino, USGS a main stem river, James Harrington, CA Philip Russell, Littleton Dept. of Fish and Game Englewood Wastewater Treatment Plant 8:45 - 9:05 Monitoring networks Compiling a baseline MARINe: A Long-term Preliminary Findings of An evaluation of Evaluation of Volunteer- National Wade- in Alabama, Fred Leslie, water quality data- Monitoring Program Anthropogenic Organic aquatic communities based Water Quality able Stream Survey AL Dept. of Environmen- base from heteroge- for Detecting Change Compounds in Source in urbanized Mediter- Monitoring Training for Comparability Study, tal Management neous data sources: in Rocky Intertidal and Finished Waters ranean climate SCORE (South Carolina Mark Southerland, lessons learned, Environments, Steve of Community Water streams: a guide to Oyster Restoration Versar, Inc. Nenad Iricanin, South Murray, California State Systems, Gregory Delzer, more effective stream and Enhancement), FL Water Management University, Fullerton USGS restoration tech- Steven O’Shields, I.M. District niques in the Santa Systems Group, Inc. Clara Basin, San Jose, California, Alison Purcell, University of CA, Berkeley 9:05 - 9:25 Open discussion Data Comparability The Value of Commu- Are environmental Physical, chemical, A Participatory, Multi- Determining the Com- facilitated by Gail Mal- and Modernization nication, Collaboration contaminant concen- and biological charac- Stakeholder Approach parability of Six Bioas- lard, USGS of Environment and Coordination for trations in U.S. waters teristics of streams in to Curbing Urban sessment Methodolo- Canada’s Water Statewide Decision harmful to fish-eating urbanizing areas near Sprawl, Andrew Kett, gies in New England, Quality Information Making: The Example wildlife?, Jo Ellen Hinck, Denver, Colorado, Citizens’ Environment Rebecca Weidman, Holdings, Chris Lochner, of the Beach Water USGS Columbia Environ- Lori Sprague, USGS Watch New England Interstate Environment Canada, Quality Workgroup, mental Research Center Water Pollution Control National Water Research Robin McGraw, CA State Commission Institute Water Resources Control Board 9:30 - 10:00 Break - Refreshments in Exhibit Hall 1
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 29 Wednesday, May 10 Meeting Room A1 Meeting Room A2 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room A7 Meeting Room C3 Concurrent Real-Time Monitor- Collaborating for Im- Cooperative Regional Evaluating Key Stress- Approaches to Volunteer Monitoring: Characterizing & WORKSHOP: Statistical ing II: Safeguarding proved Monitoring I Monitoring in Califor- ors to the Nation’s National Water Raising the Bar Interpreting Habitat Analysis of Probability Session I Drinking Water & nia—Lessons Learned Aquatic Resources Quality Monitoring & Data Survey Data Using R Public Health Moderator: Toni Johnson Assessment in Other Moderator: Jacob Statistical Software, 10:00–11:30 Moderator: Val Connor Moderator: Katherine Countries Apodaca Moderator: Dan Sullivan Part 2 Moderator: Peter Alben Tennant Moderator: Chuck Facilitator: Tony Olsen, Spooner USEPA 10:05 - 10:25 BacteriALERT: A Monitoring Environ- Cooperative Agricul- Monitoring Implications Europe-wide Stream Waders and the Watershed Steward- Cooperative Program mental Stressors tural Monitoring on of the Updated Ambient monitoring obligations Maryland Biological ship Utilizing GPS for Water-quality and Evaluating the California’s Central Water Quality Criteria under the EU Water Stream Survey: Com- Habitat and Bioas- Monitoring and Pre- Existing and Potential Coast: An Integrated, for Copper and the Framework Directive, paring Volunteer and sessment Surveys, diction of Escherichia Designated Uses Innovative Approach, Copper Biotic Ligand Jos G. Timmerman, Professional Stream Aspen Madrone, Contra coli Bacteria in the of Hardies Creek, Karen Worcester, Central Model (BLM), Lauren Institute for Inland Water Quality Data, Chris Mil- Costa County Chattahoochee River, Galesville, Wisconsin, Coast Water Board Wisniewski, USEPA Management and Waste lard, MD Dept. of Natural Georgia, Stephen Law- Daniel Helsel, WI Dept. Water Treatment (RIZA) Resources rence, USGS of Natural Resources 10:25 - 10:45 AquaSentinel: An Water Quality Indica- A Regional Approach Characterizing and Designing a National Evaluation of Volunteer Great Lakes Aquatic Advanced Real-Time tors and Monitoring to Research/Monitor- Interpreting Physi- Water Quality Moni- Data—The Lakes of Gap: A Regional Ap- Biosensor System for Design to Support ing in Southern Cali- cal Habitat in the toring Network to Missouri Volunteer proach to Identifying Source Water Protec- the Albemarle-Pam- fornia, Chris Crompton, National Wadeable support the Canadian Program Review, Gaps in Species and tion, Elias Greenbaum, lico National Estuary Orange County, California Stream Assessment, Freshwater Quality Daniel Obrecht, University Habitat Conserva- Oak Ridge National Program: A Progress Philip Kaufmann, USEPA Indicator, Rob Kent, of Missouri, Lakes of Mis- tion for Great Lake Laboratory Report, Dean Carpenter, Environment Canada souri Volunteer Program Streams, Jana Stewart, Albemarle-Pamlico USGS National Estuary Program 10:45 - 11:05 Variability in Re- Development of a Col- Southern California Nutrient and Acidity Biological Assess- Volunteer Water Qual- An Overview of sponses of Multi-Pa- laborative Multi-Juris- Laboratory Inter- Status of Wadeable ment of Water ity Monitoring Data En- the National Park rameter Sensors in a dictional Stream-Mon- calibration Exercises: Streams in the Con- Quality: Delivery of hancing Lake Chatuge Service’s Vital Prototype Real-Time itoring Network to A Demonstration tiguous United States a National System Watershed Study, Callie Signs Water Quality Early Warning System Support Restoration Regarding the Com- - Results from EPA’s in Australia, Richard Dobson, Hiwassee River Monitoring Program: to Monitor Water of the Chesapeake parability of Monitor- Wadeable Streams As- Norris, University of Watershed Coalition, Inc. A National Framework Quality, Eric Vowinkel, Bay, Stephen Preston, ing Programs Using sessment, Ellen Tarquinio, Canberra for Land Manage- USGS USGS Chesapeake Bay Multiple Laboratories, USEPA ment Agencies, Gary Program Office Rich Gossett, CRG Marine Rosenlieb, National Park Laboratories, Inc. Service 11:05 - 11:25 Real Time Monitor- Water Quality Moni- Information manage- Evaluating the extent Water monitoring and QA/QC Assessment Moving the National ing—The Installa- toring Among Local ment in a multi-agency and relative risk of utilization: surveil- of Volunteer Monitor- Water-Quality As- tion and Continuous Agencies in the Red cooperative monitoring aquatic stressors in lance, struggle or ing in Rhode Island, sessment habitat Operation of Organic River of the North program, Larry Cooper, wadeable streams symbol?, Dennis Kool, Elizabeth Herron, URI data through time, Carbon and Liquid Basin, Robert Hearne, Southern California throughout the U.S.A., Erasmus University Rot- Cooperative Extension Jeffrey Steuer, USGS Chromatography North Dakota State Coastal Water Research John Van Sickle, USEPA terdam (Centre for Public Analyzers at Remote University Project NHEERL Governance) Field Stations in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, David Gonzalez, CA Dept. of Water Resources 11:30 - 1:00 Lunch in Exhibit Hall 1
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 30 Wednesday, May 10 Meeting Room A1 Meeting Room A2 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room A7 Meeting Room C3 Concurrent The National Water Collaborating for Im- Assessing Ground Challenges in the De- Mercury Contamina- National Wadeable New Technologies & SHORT COURSE: Data Quality Monitoring proved Monitoring II Water Vulnerability velopment of Nutrient tion: Sources, Trans- Streams Assessment: Approaches Management and Session J Network for U.S. Through Statistical Criteria for Streams & port, & Fate I State Experiences Databases: Capturing, Coastal Waters and Moderator: Gayle Methods I Rivers I Moderator: Bob Carlson Storing, and Managing 1:00–2:30 their Tributaries Rominger Moderator: Mark Moderator: Leslie Data for Success in Moderator: Tom Nolan Moderator: Jeff Frey Brigham McGeorge Monitoring Session Topic: Great Lakes Monitoring Trainers: Kristine Networks Stepenuck, University of Wisconsin Extension and 1:05 - 1:25 The Great Lakes Collaborative Moni- Regression model for Overview of the Na- Statewide Monitoring Texas’ Contributions to The SWAMP Advi- Wisconsin Department National Program’s toring in the Great national assessment tional Nutrient Criteria of Mercury in Surface the National Wadeable sor—a New Tool for of Natural Resources; Multi-Media Monitor- Lakes: Revisiting the of nitrate in ground Program, Amy Parker, Water, Precipitation, Streams Assessment Producing Consistent Lynette Seigley, Iowa ing Program, Paul Lake Michigan Mass water, Bernard Nolan, USEPA and Fish in Indiana, and Future Direction of and Comprehensive Department of Natural Horvatin, Great Lakes Balance Project, USGS Martin Risch, USGS the State’s Biological Quality Assurance Resources; Revital National Program Office John Hummer, Great Monitoring Program, Project Plans (QAPPs), Katznelson, California Lakes Commission Anne Rogers, TX Com- Lawrence Keith, Instant State Water Resources mission on Environmental Reference Sources, Inc. Control Board Quality 1:25 - 1:45 National Monitoring Collaboration on Using Logistic Nutrient-Biota Interac- Mercury monitoring Validation of a Mul- Continuous nitrate Network Design for EMAP Stream Condi- Regression to Assess tions in Agriculturally in California sport timetric Index Using concentration the Great Lakes, Jack tion Assessments Regional Ground- Dominated Landscapes: fish: Past, present, Probabilistic Monitor- data from a small Kelly, USEPA National in EPA Region 8, Water Vulnerability: Lessons from the U.S. and future, Jay Davis, ing Data, Jason Hill, VA agricultural ditch in Health and Environmen- Thomas Johnson, USEPA High Plains Aquifer, Geological Survey San Francisco Estuary Dept. of Environmental Indiana: Relationship tal Effects Research Region 8 Jason Gurdak, USGS National Water-Quality Institute Quality to streamflow and in- Laboratory Colorado Water Science Assessment (NAWQA) ferences to biological Center Program, Mark Munn, processes affecting USGS nitrogen cycling, Timothy Lathrop, USGS 1:45 - 2:05 Presenter TBD A Collaborative Ap- Empirical modeling Response of benthic Mercury in northeast- A comparison of biolog- Use of Trace-Level proach to Assessing of nitrate loading and algal and inverte- ern North America: A ical methods for macro- Cyanide Method to Watershed Conditions crop yield for corn- brate communities to synthesis of existing invertebrate collection Determine Attenuation in Coastal National soybean rotations in nutrient enrichment in databases, David Evers, in Missouri streams, of Discharged Cyanide Parks, Kristen Keteles, Iowa, Robert Malone, agricultural streams: BioDiversity Research Shane Dunnaway, MO in Lower South National Park Service USDA ARS Implications for estab- Institute Dept. of Conservation San Francisco Bay, lishing nutrient criteria, Peter Schafer, City of San Robert Black, USGS Jose, CA 2:05 - 2:25 Open discussion facili- A Multi-scale Collab- Using logistic The Use of Calculated A Framework for Comparability of Identifying Greener tated by Chuck Spooner, orative Approach For regression to predict Stream Metabolism Monitoring the Habitat and Macroin- Analytical Methods USEPA Linking Terrestrial and the probability of in Understanding Nu- Response to Changing vertebrate Collection in NEMI for More Aquatic Long-Term occurrence of volatile trients in Agricultural Mercury Releases, Methods in Oklahoma’s Environmentally Monitoring: Lessons organic compounds Streams, Jill Frankforter, Michael Murray, National Low Gradient Streams, Friendly Monitoring, Learned in the Dela- in ground water, USGS Wildlife Federation Monty Porter, OK Water Jennifer Young, ACS ware River Basin and Michael Moran, USGS Resources Board Green Chemistry Institute Proposed New Direc- tions, Peter Murdoch, USGS 2:30 - 3:30 Quick Break (refreshments in Exhibit Hall 1) followed by Poster & Exhibit viewing
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 31 Wednesday, May 10 Meeting Room A1 Meeting Room A2 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room A7 Meeting Room C3 Concurrent Bits & Bytes in Cyber- State & Tribal Moni- Assessing Ground Challenges in the De- Mercury Contamina- Volunteer Monitoring Predictive Bioassess- SHORT COURSE: space: Sharing Data toring Approaches Water Vulnerability velopment of Nutrient tion: Sources, Trans- Databases ment Models Developing Habitat Session K Via the Internet Through Statistical Criteria for Streams & port, & Fate II Condition Metrics Moderator: Paul Currier Methods II Rivers II Moderator: Kristine Moderator: Gretchen 3:30–5:00 Moderator: Linda Green Moderator: Jay Davis Stepenuck Hayslip Trainer: Phil Kaufmann, Moderator: Tom Nolan Moderator: Mark Munn USEPA 3:35 - 3:55 ACWA (Alaska Clean Oklahoma’s Beneficial Screening-Level Addressing California’s Mercury cycling and Development of an Assessing the Water Action) Pro- Use Monitoring Assessments of Nutrient Issues, bioaccumulation in Internet Database for biological quality of gram and Web-based Program (BUMP) Public Water Supply Dena McCann, CA State streams in Oregon, WV Save Our Streams the Nation’s streams Tool for Managing , Results, Lessons Well Vulnerability to Water Resources Control Wisconsin, and Volunteer Monitors, with an indicator of Alaska’s Waters, Learned, and Future Natural Contaminants, Board Florida, Mark Brigham, Timothy Craddock, taxonomic complete- Dianne Denson, State of Directions, Julie Cham- Stephen Hinkle, USGS USGS WV Save Our Streams ness, Charles Hawkins, Alaska bers, OK Water Program Utah State University Resources Board 3:55 - 4:15 Integrating His- Lock ‘um in a Room, Probability of Detect- Algal Metric Ap- EMMMA: A Web- Westchester County Comparability of torical and Real-Time Hawaii’s attempt to ing Atrazine/Desethyl- proaches for Assessing based System for En- Citizens’ Volunteer Biological Assess- Monitoring Data into achieve comparabil- atrazine and Elevated Trophic Condition and vironmental Mercury Monitoring Program, ments Derived from an Internet-Based ity, Linda Koch, Hawaii Concentrations of Organic Enrichment Mapping, Modeling, Susan Darling, Westches- National-, Regional-, Watershed Informa- State Department of Nitrate in Ground in U.S. Streams and and Analysis, ter County Department of State-, and Provin- tion System for the Health Water in Colorado, Rivers, Stephen Porter, Stephen Wente, USGS Planning cial-Scale Predictive Bear River Basin, Michael Rupert, USGS USGS Models, Peter Ode, CA David Stevens, Utah Dept. of Fish and Game State University 4:15 - 4:35 Web-based Data Data-Driven Decision- Development and Impacts of Nutrients on Reconnaissance Open Source Citizen Using biomonitor- Sharing for Small Wa- making: Enhanced Application of a the Biological Integrity survey of mercury Volunteer Water ing data to assess tersheds, Lisa Walling, use of Data Qual- regression model for of Wadeable Streams in water, sediment, Monitoring Database, possible causes of Palo Alto Regional Water ity Objectives in estimating the occur- in Wisconsin, Dale and fish from U.S. Andrew Alm, Environ- biological impairment: Quality Control Plant New Hampshire’s rence of Altrazine in Robertson, USGS streams, Barbara Scud- mental Alliance for Senior Combining predictive Comprehensive Water shallow ground water der, USGS Involvement models and taxon Monitoring Strategy, beneath agricultural tolerance values, Paul Currier, State of areas of the United Daren Carlisle, USGS New Hampshire States, Paul Stackelberg, USGS 4:35 - 4:55 Displaying Water Navajo Nation Development of Spa- Control of nitrogen cy- Modeling Mercury in In-stream Monitoring Biological Assess- Quality Data on Inter- EPA Water Quality tial Probability Models cling processes in the Stream Ecosystems, Database, Gretchen Pe- ment of Water Quality: net Maps, Sandy Wil- Sampling Activities, to Estimate Ground- Upper Mississippi River Robert Ambrose, USEPA terson, PetersonGIS Delivery of a National liamson, USGS Eric Rich, Navajo Nation Water Vulnerability to (UMR), William Rich- System in Australia, EPA Nitrate Contamination ardson, USGS Biological Richard Norris, University in the Mid-Atlantic Resources Division of Canberra Region, Earl Greene, USGS 6:00 - 9:00 Evening Reception at The Tech Museum of Innovation (http://www.thetech.org/) The Tech Museum of Innovation is located across the street from the Convention Center at 201 South Market Street. The Tech is a hands-on technology and science museum for people of all ages and backgrounds. Gallery themes include innovation, the internet, the human body, and exploration. Tickets for this reception must have been purchased during pre-conference registration.
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 32 Thursday, May 11 7:00 - 8:00 Breakfast in Ballrooms A1, 2, 7, 8 7:30 - 12:00 Exhibitor Break-Down (Exhibit Hall 1) Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room C2 Meeting Room C4 Meeting Room C3 Meeting Room C1 Concurrent Monitoring Across Monitoring for Com- Integrating Monitor- Evaluation of Trends in Mercury Contamina- Volunteer Monitoring Determinants & SHORT COURSE: Devel- National Borders pounds of Emerging ing & Prediction: The Ground Water Quality: tion: Sources, Trans- Gets Results Indicators of Stress in oping O/E (Observed- Session L Concern I Quality of the Nation’s Lessons Learned from port, & Fate III Aquatic Systems to-Expected) Models Moderator: James Streams I Local to National-Scale Moderator: Danielle for Assessing Biologi- 8:00–9:30 Stribling Moderator: Akin Studies Moderator: Don Dycus Donkersloot Moderator: Jerry cal Condition Babatola Moderator: Dave Wolock Diamond Moderator: Mary Ambrose Trainer: Chuck Hawkins, Utah State University 8:05 - 8:25 Monitoring of trans- Occurrence of An- SPARROW: A Hybrid Evaluation of Ground- Wet Deposition of Connection before Pro- Integrated indica- boundary waters in thropogenic Organic Statistical-Determinis- Water-Quality Trends Mercury In The U.S. tection, Cheryl Cheadle, tors of contaminant Europe: lessons learnt Compounds in Ground tic Approach to Model- Design as Part of the and Canada, 1996- OK Conservation Com- response in resident from the UNECE pilot Water and Finished ing Surface-Water USGS National Water 2004: Results from mission species: making a projects, John Chilton, Water of Commu- Quality, Richard Smith, Quality Assessment the NADP Mercury new generation of British Geological Survey nity Water Systems, USGS Program, Michael Rosen, Deposition Network, indicators feasible for Jessica Hopple, USGS USGS David Gay, Illinois State management, Susan Water Survey Anderson, University of California, Davis 8:25 - 8:45 Global Water Monitoring Synthetic New England Sparrow Trends in Pesticide Mercury concentra- How to get the Public Using simulation to Watch, a Worldwide Musk compounds in Model and Example Detections and Con- tions in stream fish Active in Water Quality evaluate the compara- Network of Com- Municipal Wastewa- Applications of Model centrations in Ground throughout 12 west- Issues, Ginger North, DE bility of different bio- munity-Based Water ter and Estimating Results, Richard Moore, Water of the United ern states in the USA, Nature Society assessment methods, Monitoring Groups, Biota Exposure in the USGS States, 1993-2003, Alan Herlihy, Oregon Yong Cao, Utah State William Deutsch, Auburn Receiving Waters, Laura Bexfield, USGS State University University University Lantis Osemwengie, USEPA 8:45 - 9:05 Improving Binational Chemical markers of Regional scale point- Trends in shallow The roles of biogeo- Breaking the Code: Quantifying tolerance Coordination of Moni- human waste con- source nutrient load ground-water qual- chemistry and aquatic Training Volunteers indicator values for toring in the Great tamination in source estimation in support ity of the Delmarva biota in mercury to Convert Data to common stream fish Lakes, Melanie Neilson, waters: A simplified of SPARROW nutrient Peninsula, Delaware, cycling in stream eco- Information, Candie Wil- species of the United Environment Canada analytical approach, modeling, Gerard Mc- Maryland, and Virginia: systems, Lia Chasar, derman, ALLARM States, Michael Meador, Tammy Jones-Lepp, Mahon, USGS Results from local- USGS, Florida A&M USGS USEPA scale and regional University study, Linda Debrewer, USGS 9:05 - 9:25 The JA JAN Coalition Occurrence of Radi- Effect of Stream-Net- Ground-water quality Mercury in ground Data Tell Part of the Relation between ur- a Binational Col- um-224, Radium-226, work Resolution on trends of the South water. soils, and Story, Actions Write banization and relative laborative Network and Radium-228 in the Calibration of a Platte River allu- septage, New Jersey the Rest, Brian Soenen, toxicity of semiper- for Water Qual- Aquifers Used Primar- Nutrient SPARROW vial aquifer, Colorado, Coastal Plain, Julia Bar- IA Dept. of Natural meable membrane ity Monitoring in the ily for Drinking Water Model for the South- Suzanne Paschke, USGS ringer, USGS Resources device extracts from U.S.-Mexico Border in the United States: eastern United States, the Lake Tahoe Basin Region, Hiram Sarabia- Retrospective Survey Anne Hoos, USGS and Truckee River wa- Ramirez, San Diego of Results from 1987 tershed, Nevada and Baykeeper to 2004, Jeffrey Fischer, California, 2002-2004, USGS Timothy Rowe, USGS NV Water Science Center 9:30 - 10:00 Break in Ballrooms A1, 2, 7, 8
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 33 Thursday, May 11 Meeting Room A3 Meeting Room A4 Meeting Room A5 Meeting Room A6 Meeting Room C2 Meeting Room C4 Meeting Room C3 Meeting Room C1 Concurrent Conveying Results: Monitoring for Com- Integrating Monitor- Bacteria Monitoring: Mercury TMDLs: Program Evaluation & Taxonomic Data Qual- WORKSHOP: Wetlands Translating Data into pounds of Emerging ing & Prediction: The From Source to Sea Lessons Learned from Evolution ity, Comparability, & Bioassessment Session M Understanding Concern II Quality of the Nation’s Local & Regional Performance Streams II Moderator: Chris Coburn Studies Moderator: Ross Clark Facilitators: Chris 10:00–11:30 Moderator: Jessica Moderator: Akin Moderator: Andy Rehn Faulkner, USEPA; John Franks Babatola Moderator: Dave Wolock Moderator: Ruth Mack, Ohio EPA Chemerys 10:05 - 10:25 A graphical pre- Monitoring per- Biologically based Skokomish River The Sacramento Water Quality Moni- Effect of taxonomic sentation of water chlorate in shallow urban response Fecal Coliform TMDL San Joaquin River toring in Michigan, resolution on the quality data in time ground water in the models for the South Attainment Monitoring Delta Mercury TMDL: 1996-2006: A Decade performance char- and space, Peter Stoks, Central United States, Atlantic gulf and Ten- in Washington State, Reducing Methyl- of Program Evolution, acteristics of a new Association of Rhine Stephen Kalkhoff, USGS nessee River basins, George Onwumere, Wash- mercury in Fish and Gary Kohlhepp, MI Dept. macroinvertebrate Water Works RIWA Thomas Cuffney, USGS ington State Department Water, Michelle Wood, of Environmental Quality field sampling proto- of Ecology CA Regional Water Qual- col for large rivers, ity Control Board, Central Karen Blocksom, USEPA Valley Region 10:25 - 10:45 Designing a National Perchlorate Estimating pesticide Volunteer/State Guadalupe River A cooperative State A national autecol- Water Quality Moni- Monitoring in Llagas concentrations in U.S. Partnerships Inspire Watershed Mercury and USGS statewide ogy list for benthic toring Network to Groundwater Sub- streams from water- Grassroots Action, TMDL, Carrie Austin, water quality monitor- macroinvertebrates, support the Canadian basin, Michael Taraszki, shed characteristics Cheryl Snyder, PA Dept. of SFBay Water Board ing network: accom- Erik Leppo, Tetra Tech, Freshwater Quality MACTEC Engineering and pesticide proper- Environmental Protection plishments and lessons Inc. Indicator, Rob Kent, and Consulting, Inc. ties, Charles Crawford, learned after 15 years, Environment Canada, USGS Christopher Mebane, National Water Research USGS Institute 10:45 - 11:05 Watershed Assess- Occurrence of An- Regression models Volunteer Monitoring Use of multi-media Can you teach a long- Enhancing the Cred- ment: A Template thropogenic Organic for explaining and for Bacteria in San monitoring to develop term benthic moni- ibility of Taxonomic for Assessing Water Compounds in Surface predicting concentra- Francisco Bay Area a statewide mercury toring program new Data: the National Quality Conditions Water and Finished tions of organochlorine Creeks, Amy Wagner, TMDL, Bruce Monson, tricks? Assessment Wadeable Streams at Watershed Level, Water of Commu- pesticides in whole USEPA MN Pollution Control and redesign to ad- Assessment, Anitra Pawley, University nity Water Systems, fish from U.S. streams, Agency dress different scales, James Stribling, Tetra of California, Davis James Kingsbury, USGS Lisa Nowell, USGS Marc Vayssières, CA Dept. Tech, Inc. of Water Resources 11:05 - 11:25 LakeSuperiorStreams. Concentrations of Use of WARP to Surfrider Foundation’s Mercury Emis- Optimization of a How often are we org: Making storm- organic compounds Design a Monitoring Blue Water Task Force sion Trends and Large-scale Water wrong? A Bayes- water and stream in wastewater at Program to Identify Program - Volunteer Biota Response in Quality Monitoring Net- ian assessment of data come alive for five sites in New Waters Potentially at Monitoring that Leads Florida: Case Study, work in South Florida, taxonomic identifica- citizens, students, York State, 2003-04, Risk from Pesticides, to Change, Rick Wilson, Thomas Atkeson, FL Patricia Burke, South tions for the National teachers, contractors, Patrick Phillips, USGS Nelson Thurman, USEPA Surfrider Foundation Dept. of Environmental FL Water Management Wadeable Streams resource agencies, Protection District Assessment, Lester decision-makers Yuan, USEPA and scientists, Richard Axler, University of Minnesota - Duluth
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 34 Thursday, May 11 11:30 - 1:15 Closing Plenary Luncheon (Ballrooms A1, 2, 7, 8)
Introduction to Closing Plenary, Charles Spooner, NWQMC Co-Chair Keynote Speaker - The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributaries, Dr. Robert Hirsch, Chair, Subcommittee on Water Quality and Availability Keynote Speaker - The Importance of a National Framework, Ms. Julie Packard, Executive Director, Monterey Bay Aquarium Conference Closing, David Tucker, Conference Chair 1:30 - 3:30 Exhibitor Demonstrations at Guadalupe River Park & Gardens (Meet in Ballroom Concourse; participants will walk to demo site) 1:30 - 4:30 From Paper to Action: Implementing State Water Monitoring Strategies -- State/EPA Meeting (Meeting Room A3) In this interactive forum, State water quality managers and staff are invited to identify common challenges and share practical solutions to implementing their water quality monitoring strategies. 1:30 - 5:00 USGS NAWQA Program Meetings (Meeting Rooms TBA) 1:30 - 5:00 Field Trip: Wetlands Bioassessment (Part 2 of Workshop) (Meet at main entrance to Convention Center on 1st floor) 1:30 - 5:00 Field Trip: Salt Pond Restoration Tour (Meet at main entrance to Convention Center on 1st floor)
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-AGENDA 35 POSTER PRESENTATIONS
Poster presentations are listed below in thematic groups. All posters within the same thematic group will appear together in the Exhibit Hall.
Abstract# Poster title, Author, Affiliation
ASSESSING AND EVALUATING GROUND WATER AND DRINKING WATER RESOURCES
001 Effects of Organic Carbon Distribution on Redox Chemistry in a Glacial Aquifer, Woodbury, Connecticut, Craig Brown, U.S. Geological Survey
002 Optimizing a Monitoring Network Using Water Quality and Environmental Factors in the Glacial Aquifer System, United States, Terri Arnold, U.S. Geological Survey
003 Estimation of Stream-Valley Aquifer Withdrawals, 2000, Pierre Sargent, USGS
004 Comparison of the Vulnerability of Domestic Wells and Public Wells to Volatile Organic Compounds, Barbara Rowe, U.S. Geological Survey
005 Nutrients in ground water from private, public-supply, and monitoring wells open to the glacial aquifer system, United States, Kelly Warner, U.S. Geological Survey
006 Can we distinguish regional from local variations in trace-element concentration in the glacial aquifer system of the northern United States?, George Groschen, U.S. Geological Survey
007 Natural and human factors affecting shallow ground-water quality at local and regional scales in the North Atlantic Coastal Plain, New York through North Carolina, Scott Ator, US Geological Survey
008 Trends in ground-water withdrawals for irrigation and public-supply uses across the United States, Richard Marella, U.S. Geological Survey
009 Using a modified probability approach for determining the contributing area to a public supply well in karst terrain, Christy Crandall, U.S. Geological Survey
010 Spatial distribution of dissolved solids in major aquifers and rivers in the Southwestern United States, Nancy Bauch, U.S. Geological Survey Colorado Water Science Center
011 Reactive Transport of Nitrate in a Heterogeneous Alluvial Fan Aquifer, San Joaquin Valley, California, Christopher Green, U.S. Geological Survey
012 Framework of Possible Factors that Affect Water Quality in Basin-fill Aquifers of the Southwestern United States, Susan Thiros, U.S. Geological Survey
013 New Jersey’s Ambient Ground-Water-Quality Monitoring Network: An Update, Michael Serfes, New Jersey Geological Survey (NJGS)
014 Design Considerations for Assessing Ground-Water Quality in Regional Aquifer Systems: The High Plains Aquifer, Bret Bruce, U.S. Geological Survey
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-POSTER PRESENTATIONS 36 EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF KEY STRESSORS AND EMERGING CONTAMINANTS
015 Salt Marsh Ecosystem Heath at Ft. Pulaski National Monument near Savannah, Georgia, Joseph Richardson, Savannah State University
016 Relationships between species traits and trace element bioaccumulation in riverine fishes, Terry Short, U.S. Geological Survey
017 Uranium and 222radon in ground water from glacial and bedrock aquifers in the northern United States, Joseph Ayotte, U.S. Geological Survey
018 Agricultural Pesticides in Shallow Ground-water Flow Systems: A Contrast between Systems, Gregory Steele, U.S. Geological Survey
019 The Occurrence of Volatile Organic Compounds in Aquifers of the United States, Wayne Lapham, U.S. Geological Survey
020 Real-Time Monitoring and Regression Analysis for Specific Conductance and Sodium-Adsorption Ratios in an Area of Coalbed Natural Gas Development in the Powder River Basin, Montana and Wyoming, Melanie Clark, U.S. Geological Survey
021 Small Scale Water Monitoring Networks for USACE Construction Projects, John Baum, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District
022 Using Long-Term Monitoring and Special Studies To Evaluate Trends and Address Problems at Twelve USACE Managed Reservoirs in California, John Baum, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District
023 Using a Spatially Balanced, Random Sampling Design to Assist Informed Management Decisions, Sarah Lowe, San Francisco Estuary Institute
024 Analysis of Pesticides, Antibiotics, and their Degradation Products Using State-of-the-Art Mass Spectrometry, Elisabeth Scribner, U.S. Geological Survey, Kansas Water Science Center
025 Herbicide transport and transformations in the unsaturated zone of two small agricultural basins with corn and soybean row crops, Tracy Hancock, U.S. Geological Survey
026 Dissolved Copper Trends in Lower South San Francisco Bay, Eric Dunlavey, City of San José
027 Legacy and Emerging Contaminants in San Francisco Bay Sport Fish, 2003, Ben Greenfield, San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI)
028 Comparison of Anthropogenic Organic Compounds in the Source Water and Finished Water for the City of Atlanta, October 2002 - May 2005, Melinda Dalton, U.S. Geological Survey, Georgia Water Science Center
029 A National Assessment of PBDEs in Lake Fish Tissue, Leanne Stahl, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
030 Establishment of Baseline Water-Quality and Sediment-Chemistry Data at Sentinel Sampling Sites on Lake Powell for Future Monitoring of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants, Robert Hart, U.S. Geological Survey
031 The National Stream Quality Accounting Network (NASQAN II) Program: A Case Study of Water Quality in the Lower Rio Grande Basin, Rebecca Lambert, U.S. Geological Survey
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-POSTER PRESENTATIONS 37 MERCURY
032 Mercury Biomagnification from the Base of the Food Chain in Guadalupe River Watershed, San Jose, CA, Brent Topping, U.S. Geological Survey
033 Monitoring Mercury Contamination in the Carson River System, Nevada, Karen Thomas, Nevada Water Science Center
034 Mercury transport to San Francisco Bay through the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, Nicole David, San Francisco Estuary Institute
035 Water and Air – Mercury in Idaho, Marti Bridges, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
036 Monitoring Mercury Bioaccumulation in Fish during Everglades Restoration, David Evans, NOAA Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research
037 The Fish Mercury Project: Involving Stakeholders in Monitoring and Risk Communication in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Watershed, Alyce Ujihara, California Department of Health Services, Environmental Health Investigations Branch
038 Caspian and Forster’s Terns as Indicators of Mercury and Other Priority Pollutant Exposure in San Francisco Bay, Terrence Adelsbach, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
039 Time Series Study of Mercury in San Francisco Bay, Christopher Conaway, UC-Santa Cruz
040 Use of a National Descriptive Model of Mercury in Fish in Site-specific Applications, Stephen Wente, U.S. Geological Survey
041 Mercury in Stream Water, Streambed Sediment, and Fish of the Willamette Basin, Oregon, in Relation to Mercury Sources, Dennis Wentz, U.S. Geological Survey
042 Characterization of mercury concentrations in suspended sediment loads in Guadalupe River and Coyote Creek, San Jose, California: Can TMDL targets be met?, Lester McKee, San Francisco Estuary Institute
043 Mercury Monitoring in the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant, James Downing, City of San José
NUTRIENTS
044 Trends in Water Quality and Nutrient Sources and In-stream Nutrient Loads in the Southeastern United States, Douglas Harned, U.S. Geological Survey
045 Fate and transport of nutrients in the unsaturated zone in five agricultural areas of the United States, Lawrence Fisher, U.S. Geological Survey
046 Whole stream response to nitrate loading in three streams draining agricultural landscapes in Washington, Maryland, and Nebraska, John Duff, U.S. Geological Survey
047 Random nutrient concentration v. targeted nutrient concentration...is there a difference?, Mary Anne Nelson, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
048 Supporting nutrient criteria development nationwide: Web application & Technical REQuest System (T-REQS), Jeroen Gerritsen, Tetra Tech, Inc.
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-POSTER PRESENTATIONS 38 049 Determination of Trends in Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations and Loads in Major River Basins, South-Central United States, Richard Rebich, U.S. Geological Survey, Mississippi Water Science Center
EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY: URBANIZATION AND AGRICULTURE
050 Causes of Increased Total Dissolved Solids and Conductivity Levels in Urban Streams in Georgia, Ted Mikalsen, Georgia Environmental Protection Division
051 Effects of Altered Storm Water Discharge on Water Quality in the Vernon River Estuary, Georgia, Joseph Richardson, Coastal Environmental Analysis
052 NAWQA Addresses Urban Water-Quality Issues through Multiple Studies, Cathy Tate, U.S. Geological Survey
053 Effects of Urbanization on Stream Stage and Temperature during Winter and Summer Storms within the Piedmont of North Carolina, 2002-2003, Robin Brightbill, U.S. Geological Survey
054 Nutrients and Biological Communities of Ozark Streams, 1993-2005, James Petersen, U.S. Geological Survey
055 Environmental Monitoring Network in the Cedar Creek Experimental Watershed, Gary Heathman, USDA-ARS
056 Occurrence of Volatile Organic Compounds in Selected Urban Streams in the United States, 1995-2003, David Bender, U.S. Geological Survey
057 Analysis of the effects of road salt on water quality in the northern United States, John Mullaney, U.S. Geological Survey
058 Estimating and Projecting Impervious Cover in the Southeastern United States, James Harrison, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4
059 Response of fish communities to gradients of urbanization in southeastern streams near Atlanta, Georgia, M. Brian Gregory, U.S. Geological Survey
060 Urban Hydrology Monitoring Programs in the Atlanta Metropolitan Area, Georgia, William Hughes, U.S. Geological Survey
061 Development of an urban hydrological model linking denitrification potential to urban wetland restoration, Michael Mak, Rutgers University
062 National Water Quality Surveillance for Waterborne Pathogens and Related Indicators in Canadian Agricultural Waters, Rob Kent, Environment Canada
063 Anthropogenic Impacts to Fish Assemblages in Northern New Jersey Streams, Leslie McGeorge, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
064 Controlling Cumulative Impacts from Impervious Surfaces: Relationship between California State Law and NPDES Requirements, Brian Schmidt, Committee for Green Foothills
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-POSTER PRESENTATIONS 39 MONITORING APPROACHES FOR WATERSHED ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
065 Diurnal Nutrient Fluctuations in the Lake Okeechobee Watershed, Florida, Robert Sheridan, ETI Professionals, Inc. c/o U.S. Geological Survey
066 Assessment of native stream biodiversity and the influence of invasive species in Tierra del Fuego, Chile, Michelle Moorman, U.S. Geological Survey
067 Using Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program Data for Describing Condition of Inner Columbia River Basin Streams, Lillian Herger, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
068 The Water Quality Monitoring Programs of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB), Bill Cauthron, Oklahoma Water Resources Board
069 Coastal Watershed Assessment - Point Reyes National Seashore and Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Brannon Ketcham, Point Reyes National Seashore
070 San Francisco Area Network Water Quality Monitoring Protocol, Mary Cooprider, National Park Service
071 Water Quality Status and Issues in Nepal, Ms. Keshari Bajracharya, His Majesty's Government, Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology
072 New York City's Harbor Survey Program Water Quality Monitoring in an Urban Watershed, Beau Ranheim, City of New York Dept. of Environmental Protection
073 An Overview of the California Monitoring and Assessment Program (CMAP) for Perennial Streams, Melenee Emanuel, California State Water Resources Control Board
074 Sediment Quality Indicators for the Delaware Estuary, Edward Santoro, Delaware River Basin Commission
075 EPA’s National Study of Chemical Residues in Lake Fish Tissue, Leanne Stahl, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
VOLUNTEER MONITORING AND STAKEHOLDER PARTNERSHIPS AND COLLABORATIONS
076 Working together to determine the status of Maryland's Coastal Bays, Carol Cain, Maryland Coastal Bays Program
077 BioSITE: Students Investigating Their Environment, Sandra Derby, Children's Discovery Museum
078 Resources Available for Volunteer Monitoring Programs, Elizabeth Herron, Cooperative Extension
079 The Nuts and Bolts of a Volunteer Monitoring Day, Janet Cohen, Community Action Partners
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-POSTER PRESENTATIONS 40 DATA MANAGEMENT, ANALYSIS, SHARING, AND INTERPRETATION
080 Introducing NHDPlus!, Kristen Gunthardt, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water
081 Geographic Targeting for Watershed Restoration, Donald Malone, Tennessee Valley Authority
082 New NHD Tools for the Evaluation of Watershed Condition and Management Performance, William Cooter, RTI International
083 Evaluating Watershed Condition and Management Performance with the NHDPlus Toolkit, Mellony Hoskinson, RTI International
084 Arkansas Monitoring Data Assessment Program (AMDAP) Using the Segment Evaluation Spreadsheet (SEGEVAL.XLS), Jessica Franks, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Region 6
085 Spatial Scale and the Proximity Factor for Water Quality-Landscape Correlations, Ronald Zelt, U.S. Geological Survey
086 An American/Canadian Partnership - Sharing Data for the Gulf of Maine, Deb Soule, New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services
087 RésEau: Building Canadian Water Connections, Chris Lochner, National Water Research Institute, National Water Quality Monitoring Office
088 Facilitating the Exchange and Reporting of Monitoring Data, Cristina Grosso, San Francisco Estuary Institute
089 New Tools for Importing, Sharing, and Visualizing Biological Monitoring Data Using the Ecological Data Analysis System (EDAS), Jeffrey White, Tetra Tech, Inc.
090 Flood-Tracking Chart for the Chattahoochee River near Metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, Jacob LaFontaine, U.S. Geological Survey
091 Proactive Water Quality Monitoring with Actionable Data in Drinking Water Distribution Systems, Uwe Michalak, Sensicore, Inc.
DATA QUALITY, COMPARABILITY, AND MEASUREMENT PERFORMANCE
092 Use of Colilert, Colilert-18 and Enterolert for the Determination of E.coli, fecal coliforms and enterococci in Waste Waters, Gil Dichter, IDEXX laboratories
093 A Case Study for Comparison of NAWQA and EMAP Protocols for Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Habitat, David Peterson, U.S. Geological Survey
094 A Comparison of Stream Biological Assessment Results Obtained Using Different Sampling Protocols in Midwestern Agricultural Streams, Thomas Wilton, Iowa Department of Natural Resources
095 A Comparison of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Assemblages Collected in New Mexico and Texas Reference Streams Using Selected Methods from State and Federal Agencies, James Moring, U.S. Geological Survey
096 Components of Variability in Long Term Regional Monitoring Program Data, Donald Yee, San Francisco Estuary Institute
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-POSTER PRESENTATIONS 41 097 Discrete versus continuous: A comparison of water quality monitoring frequencies, Nelia White, San Francisco State University and San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board
098 Improving Quality Assurance Project Plans with an Expert System, Beverly van Buuren, San Jose State University Foundation, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories
099 The Analysis of Turbidity Data: Establishing the Link between Sample Characteristics and Measurement Technologies, Michael Sadar, Hach Company
100 Interstate assessment: Cross-calibration of the Biological Condition Gradient among state monitoring programs in New England, Jeroen Gerritsen, Tetra Tech, Inc.
101 Four Ways to Get Biased Estimates of Pollutant Loads, R Peter Richards, National Center for Water Quality Research, Heidelberg College
102 Site Evaluation and Field Sampling Coordination for National Scale Surveys: Supporting the Probability Design Network, Jennifer Pitt, Tetra Tech, Inc.
103 Optical Dissolved Oxygen Sensors Maximize Accuracy, Minimize Downtime, Robert Mooney, In- Situ Inc.
104 Achieving Comparability for a Statewide Program through Careful Selection of Quality Assurance and Quality Control Systems, Beverly van Buuren, San Jose State University Foundation, Moss Landing Marine Labs
105 Importance of field QC Samples in Designing Monitoring Programs and Interpreting Data for Trace Elements in Aquatic Organisms, Lawrence DeWeese, U.S. Geological Survey
BIOASSESSMENT ISSUES, APPROACHES, AND EXPERIENCES
106 Watershed Stewardship Utilizing GPS Habitat and Bioassessment Surveys, Abby Fateman, Contra Costa County
107 Environmental Monitoring Program benthic Special Studies, Karen Gehrts, Division of Environmental Services
108 Relations of hydrologic and physical characteristics to aquatic assemblages in low-gradient streams in agricultural settings in North-Central and Northeastern U.S., Jennifer Hogan, U.S. Geological Survey, Illinois Water Science Center
109 Validation of a Multimetric Index Using Probabilistic Monitoring Data, Jason Hill, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
110 The effects of fine sediment accumulation on macroinvertebrate distributions below urban dams, Steven Fend, U.S. Geological Survey
111 The effects of intra-annual variability on interpreting long-term trends in macroinvertebrate-based bioassessments, James Carter, U.S. Geological Survey
112 Probabilistic Monitoring in Oklahoma, Monty Porter, Oklahoma Water Resources Board
113 Application of the Reference Condition Approach to Assessing Aquatic Ecosystem Health in Canada’s National Parks, Rob Kent, Environment Canada
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-POSTER PRESENTATIONS 42 114 Assessing the importance of restoration in improving water quality within the Tomales Bay watershed, Lorraine Parsons, Point Reyes National Seashore 115 An Assessment of the Chemical, Habitat and Biological Condition of Wadeable Streams in the Lower Columbia Region of Oregon, Michael Mulvey, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
116 An Assessment of the Chemical, Habitat and Biological Condition of Wadeable Stream Habitat of Threatened Oregon Coastal Coho Salmon, Michael Mulvey, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
117 Effects of Climate and Hydrology on Biological Traits of Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Central United States, Jeffrey Mabe, U.S. Geological Survey
NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND APPROACHES
118 Low Cost Wireless Remote Monitoring Advancements, Stephen Cone, American Innovations
119 Event Monitoring Water Quality of Micro-Watersheds in Southern Alberta Utilizing Real Time Rom Communications, Lawrence Schinkel, Government of Alberta
120 Evaluation of Blood as a Surrogate for the Monitoring of Mercury in Largemouth- and Smallmouth Bass Muscle Tissue, William Brumbaugh, U.S. Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center
121 Evaluating nitrate sources in nested agricultural sub-basins using nitrate stable isotopes, Moon Kim, USGS
122 The Sensitivity of Whole-Stream Metabolism Calculations to Measurement Errors, Jerad Bales, U.S. Geological Survey
123 The Use of Geo-Informatics and Remote Sensing Techniques for the Assessment of Oil and Gas Pipeline Spills, William Roper, George Mason University
124 Technological advances in handheld computers and the impact on data collection and processing, Sandra Kinnaman, U.S. Geological Survey
125 Improvement of water quality monitoring by onsite and automatic monitoring, Olivier Thomas, Université de Sherbrooke
126 Towards a new procedure for wastewater discharge survey, Marie-Florence Pouet, Université de Sherbrooke
127 Use of In-Situ Amendments to Reduce Ecological Risk from Metals Contaminated Sediments, David Gratson, Neptune and Company
128 What's in a CUP of British Columbia Surface Water?, Melissa Gledhill, Environment Canada
129 Linear Regression of Water Quality Data with Nondetects - A New Method, Dennis Helsel, U.S. Geological Survey
130 Real-Time Monitoring of Organic Carbon and Selected Anions in the Sacramento/San Joaquin River Delta System, Steven San Julian, California Department of Water Resources
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-POSTER PRESENTATIONS 43 INTEGRATING MONITORING WITH SIMULATION AND PREDICTION
131 Characterization of Streamflow Requirements for Habitat Restoration, Upper Salmon River Basin, Idaho, Terry Maret, U.S. Geological Survey
132 Regional-scale sources, transport, and sinks of dissolved solids in water resources of the Southwestern United Sates, David Anning, U.S. Geological Survey
133 Nitrate in ground water: Using a model to simulate the probability of nitrate contamination of shallow ground water in the conterminous United States, Kerie Hitt, U.S. Geological Survey
134 Modeling the Fate of Particle-Associated Contaminants in San Francisco Bay, CA, John Oram, SFEI
135 Statistical optimization of a coastal water quality monitoring program, Carlton Hunt, Battelle
136 Predicting Sediment and Nutrient Loads in Tropical Watersheds in Puerto Rico, Edwin Martinez, University of Puerto Rico
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San José, CA-POSTER PRESENTATIONS 44 CONFERENCE ATTENDEE CONTACT INFORMATION
Mary Adams Jacob Daniel Apodaca Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board Lower Colorado River Authority 895 Aerovista Plasa, Ste 101 3700 Lake Austin Blvd. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Austin, TX 78703 [email protected] [email protected]
Marina Alberti Ann Ardis University of Washington US Geological Survey Box 355740 8027 Exchange Drive Seattle, WA 98195 Austin, TX 78754 [email protected] [email protected]
Stephen Albinati Terri Arnold AXYS Technologies, Inc. US Geological Survey 2045 Mills Road West 1201 W. University Ave., Ste 100 Sidney, BC V8L 3S8 Urbana, IL 61801 [email protected] [email protected]
Richard Alexander LeAnne Astin US Geological Survey ICPRB 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive 413 National Center 51 Monroe Street, Ste PE-08 Reston, VA 20192 Rockville, MD 20850 [email protected] [email protected]
Valerie Alley Scott Ator Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality US Geological Survey 1542 Old Whitfield Road 8987 Yellow Brick Road Pearl, MS 39208 Baltimore, MD 21237 [email protected] [email protected]
Mary Ambrose Carrie Austin Texas Commission on Environmental Quality San Francisco Bay Water Board PO Box 13087 1515 Clay Street, #1400 Austin, TX 78711 Oakland, CA 94612 [email protected] [email protected]
Scott Anderholm Richard Axler US Geological Survey University of Minnesota 5338 Montgomery Blvd., NE, Ste. 400 Natural Resources Research Institute Albuquerque, NM 87109 5013 Miller Trunk Highway [email protected] Duluth, MN 55811 [email protected] Greg Anderson Virginia Dept Environmental Quality-WCRO Joseph Ayotte 3019 Peters Creek Road US Geological Survey Roanoke, VA 24019 361 Commerce Way [email protected] Pembroke, NH 03275 [email protected] Patrick Anderson US Geological Survey Juanita Bacey 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg C California Dept. of Pesticide Regulation Fort Collins, CO 80526 1001 I Street [email protected] Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] David Anning US Geological Survey Susan Baker 2255 N. Gemini Drive NOAA/NOS/NCCOS Flagstaff, AZ 86001 1305 East-West Highway N/SCI 1, Room 131 [email protected] Silver Spring, MD 20910 [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 560 Nancy Baker Trudy Bennett US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 5957 Lakeside Blvd. 7920 W Kellogg, Ste 4 Indianapolis, IN 46278 Wichita, KS 67209 [email protected] [email protected]
Jerad Bales Marian Berndt US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 3916 Sunset Ridge Road 2010 Levy Avenue Raleigh, NC 27607 Tallahassee, FL 32310 [email protected] [email protected]
Jack Barbash Laura Bexfield US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 1201 Pacific Ave., Ste 600 5338 Montgomery Blvd., NE Suite 400 Tacoma, WA 98070 Albuquerque, NM 87109 [email protected] Carise Barbour U. S. Geological Survey Robert Black 119 National Center 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive US Geological Survey Reston, VA 20192 1201 Pacific Avenue, Ste 600 [email protected] Tacoma, WA 98402 [email protected] Michael Barbour Tetra Tech, Inc. Lee Blankenstein 400 Red Brook Blvd., Ste 200 American Innovations Owings Mills, MD 21117 12112 Technology, Ste. 100 [email protected] Austin, TX 78727 [email protected] Kimberlee Barnes US Geological Survey Darlene Blum PO Box 1230 US Geological Survey Iowa City, IA 52244 2010 Levy Avenue [email protected] Tallahassee, FL 32310 [email protected] Julia Barringer US Geological Survey Bob Blythe 810 Bear Tavern Road In-Situ, Inc. West Trenton, NJ 08628 221 E. Lincoln Avenue [email protected] Fort Collins, CO 80524 [email protected] Jennifer Bayer US Geological Survey Barry Booth 5501A Cook-Underwood Road ROM Communications Underwood, WA 89605 12705 65th Street [email protected] Edmonton, AB T5A 0Z4 [email protected] Angie Becker Kudelka Minnesota Waters Nate Booth 817 S. Minnesota Street US Geological Survey New Ulm, MN 56073 8505 Research Way [email protected] Middleton, WI 53562 [email protected] Richard Bell US Geological Survey, WRD Kip Bossong 5338 Montgomery Blvd., NE US Geological Survey Albuquerque, NM 87109 PO Box 25046, MS 415 Denver Federal Center [email protected] Lakewood, CO 80225 [email protected] Amanda Bell US Geological Survey Rajender Brahman 8505 Research Way Green Chemistry Institute Middleton, WI 53562 5723 Elliott Court, Apt. 170 [email protected] Alexandria, VA 22311 [email protected] David Bender US Geological Survey Anne Brasher 1608 Mountain View Road US Geological Survey Rapid City, SD 57702 Utah Water Science Center 121 West 200 South [email protected] Moab, UT 84532 [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 561 Michael Brayton Pat Burke US Geological Survey SFWMD 8987 Yellow Brick Road 1000 NE 40th Ave, MS4653 Baltimore, MD 21237 Okeechobee, FL 34972 [email protected] [email protected]
Marti Bridges Noel Burns Idaho Dept of Environmental Quality Lakes Consulting 1410 N. Hilton 42 Seabreeze Road Boise, ID 83706 Devonport, Auckland, 1309 [email protected] [email protected]
Mark Brigham Karen Burow US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 2280 Woodale Drive Placer Hall, 6000 J Street Mounds View, MN 55112 Sacramento, CA 95819 [email protected] [email protected]
Robin Brightbill Erick Burres US Geological Survey California SWRCB 215 Limekiln Road 320 W. Fourth Street, Ste 200 New Cumberland, PA 17070 Los Angeles, CA 90013 [email protected] [email protected]
Larry Brown Becca Bushon US Geological Survey US Geological Survey Placer Hall, 6000 J Street 6480 Doubletree Avenue Sacramento, CA 95819 Columbus, OH 43229 [email protected] [email protected]
Robert Broz Steve Butkus University of Missouri Extension Weston Solutions 205 Ag Engr Bldg 2433 Impala Drive Columbia, MO 65211 Carlsbad, CA 92010 [email protected] [email protected]
Bret Bruce Daniel Butler US Geological Survey Oklahoma Conservation Commission PO Box 25046, MS-415 PO Box 53134 Denver, CO 80225 Oklahoma City, OK 73152 [email protected] [email protected]
William Brumbaugh Daniel Button US Geological Survey US Geological Survey Environmental Research Center 4200 New Haven Road 6480 Doubletree Avenue Columbia, MO 65201 Columbus, OH 43229 [email protected] [email protected]
Wade Bryant Gary Cacciatore US Geological Survey Greenspan Analytical c/o Goyen Valve Corp 3850 Holcomb Bridge Road 1195 Airport Road Norcross, GA 30047 Lakewood, NJ 08701 [email protected] [email protected]
Ernestine Bryant Carol Cain Lockheed Martin NEISEC Maryland Coastal Bays Program 1010 N. Glebe Road, Ste 800 9919 Stephen Decatur Hwy., Ste 4 Arlington, VA 22201 Ocean City, MD 21842 [email protected] [email protected]
Lucy Buchan Judy Campbell Bird Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Program US Geological Survey 1410 Jackson Street 4831 Langdrum Lane Oakland, CA 94612 Chevy Chase, MD 20815 [email protected] Sarah Burger Kaibab Pauite Tribe Paul Capel HC 65 Box 2 US Geological Survey Fredonia, AZ 86022 University of Minnesota 122 Cive Bldg [email protected] Minneapolis, MN 55455 [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 562 Beth Card Lia Chasar NEIWPCC US Geological Survey 116 John Street, Boott Mills South Florida Integrated Science Center 2010 Levy Avenue Lowell, MA 01852 Tallahassee, FL 32310 [email protected] [email protected]
Daren Carlisle Ruth Chemerys US Geological Survey US Environmental Protection Agency 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 413 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW Reston, VA 20192 Washington, DC 20460 [email protected] [email protected]
Kurt Carpenter David Chestnut US Geological Survey South Carolina DHEC 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive 2600 Bull Street Portland, OR 97216 Columbia, SC 29201 [email protected] [email protected]
Dean Carpenter Melanie Clark Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program US Geological Survey 1601 Mail Service Center 2617 E.l Lincolnway, Ste B Raleigh, NC 27699 Cheyenne, WY 82001 [email protected] [email protected]
Marnie Carroll Brian Clark Dine College US Geological Survey PO Box 580 401 Hardin Road Shiprock, NM 87420 Little Rock, AR 72211 [email protected] [email protected]
Robert Carson Greg Clark National Park Service US Geological Survey 1 Bear Valley Road 230 Collins Road Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 Boise, ID 83702 [email protected] [email protected]
Jim Carter Heather Clark Dantzker US Geological Survey Community Science Institute 345 Middlefield Road, MS 465 587 E. Miller Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Ithaca, NY 14850 [email protected] [email protected]
Brian Caskey Chris Coburn US Geological Survey Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary 5957 Lakeside Blvd. 55D Municipal Wharf Indianapolis, IN 46278 Santa Cruz, CA 95060 [email protected] [email protected]
Kirsten Cassingham James Coles US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 3916 Sunset Ridge Road c/o EPA Region 1 1 Congress Street, HBS Raleigh, NC 27607 Boston, MA 02114 [email protected] [email protected]
Cecily Chang Matt Combes US Geological Survey Missouri Dept of Conservation 345 Middlefield, Mail Stop 434 2500 S. Halliburton Meno Park, CA 95125 Kirksville, MO 63501 [email protected] [email protected]
Miao-Li Chang Stephen Cone Maryland Dept of Environment American Innovations 1800 Washington Blvd., Ste 540 12112 Technology, Ste. 100 Baltimore, MD 21230 Austin, TX 78727 [email protected] [email protected]
Derrick Charbonnet Val Connor Chipotle Business Group, Inc. State Water Resources Control Board 212 Dewey Avenue 1001 "I" Street, 15th Floor Ocean Springs, MS 39564 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 563 Mary Cooprider Jill Csekitz LSA Associates, Inc. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 157 Park Place PO Box 13087 Pt. Richmond, CA 94801 Austin, TX 78711 [email protected] [email protected]
William Cooter Curtis Cude RTI International Oregon Dept of Environmental Quality-MSD/15 12013 N. Exeter Way 811 SW 6th Avenue Raleigh, NC 27613 Portland, OR 97204 [email protected] [email protected]
Eric Coulombe Tom Cuffney Schlumberger Water Services US Geological Survey Waterloo Hydrogeologic, Inc. 460 Phillip Street, Ste 101 3916 Sunset Ridge Road Waterloo, On N2l 5j2 Raleigh, NC 27607 [email protected] [email protected]
Lyle Cowles Paul Currier EPA Region 7 New Hampshire Dept of Environmental Services 901 N. 5th Street PO Box 95 Kansas City, KS 66101 Concord, NH 03302 [email protected] [email protected]
Jim Cowles Dave Dalkin WSDA Teledyme RD Instruments 1111 Washington St., SE 9855 Businesspark Avenue Olympia, WA 98504 San Diego, CA 92131 [email protected] [email protected]
Tim Craddock Melinda Dalton WestVirginia Save Our Streams Program US Geological Survey 601 57th Street SE 3039 Amwiler Road, Ste 130 Charleston, WV 25304 Atlanta, GA 30360 [email protected] [email protected]
Christy Crandall Susan Darling US Geological Survey Westchester County Dept of Planning 2010 Levy Ave., Bldg B Michaelian Office Bldg, Rm. 432 148 Martine Avenue Tallahassee, FL 32310 White Plains, NY 10601 [email protected] [email protected]
Mark Crane Nicole David Delaware Division of Water Resources/ELS San Francisco Estuary Institute 89 Kings Hwy 7770 Pardee Lane Dover, DE 19901 Oakland, CA 94621 [email protected] [email protected]
Charles Crawford Susan Davies US Geological Survey Maine Dept of Environmental Protection 5957 Lakeside Blvd. SHS 17 Indianapolis, IN 46273 Augusta, ME 04333 [email protected] [email protected]
Kathryn Crestani Wayne Davis Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District US Environmental Protection Agency 4747 East 49th Street Environmental Service Center 701 Mapes Road Cuyahoga Heights, OH 44125 Ft. Meade, MD 20755 [email protected] [email protected]
Jamison Crosby Jay Davis Contra Costa County Clean Water Program San Francisco Estuary Institute 255 Glacier Drive 7770 Pardee Lane Martinez, CA 94553 Oakland, CA 94621 [email protected] [email protected]
Diane Cross Jerri Davis South Yuba River Citizens League US Geological Survey 14879 Brush Creek Court 1400 Independence Rd., MS100 Nevada City, CA 95959 Rolla, MO 65401 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 564 Dennis de Kool Ellen Dickey Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Delaware Dept of Water Resources/ELS PO Box 1738 89 Kings Hwy Rotterdam, Dover, DE 19901 [email protected] [email protected]
Linda Dean Sam Dinkins In-Situ, Inc. Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission 221 E. Lincoln Avenue 5735 Kellogg Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 Cincinnati, OH 45228 [email protected] [email protected]
Linda Debrewer Callie Dobson US Geological Survey Hiwassee River Watershed Coalition, Inc. 8987 Yellow Brick Road 87 Upper Peachtree Road Baltimore, MD 21237 Murphy, NC 28906 [email protected] [email protected]
Greg Delzer Joseph Domagalski US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 1608 Mountain View Road 6000 J Street Placer Hall Rapid City, SD 57702 Sacramento, CA 95819 [email protected] [email protected]
Dianne Denson Danielle Donkersloot Alaska Dept of Environmental Conservation New Jersey Dept Environmental Protection PO Box 111800 401 E. State Street Juneau, AK 99811 Trenton, NJ 08625 [email protected] [email protected]
Myron Denson Alice Dossett PO Box 111800 Mississipps Dept of Environmental Quality Juneau, AK 99811 1542 Old Whitfield Road [email protected] Pearl, MS 39208 [email protected] Judy Denver US Geological Survey James Downing 1289 McD Drive City of San Jose Dover, DE 19901 170 W. San Carlos Street [email protected] San Jose, CA 95134 [email protected] Jessie Denver City of San Jose Neil Dubrovsky 170 W. San Carlos Street US Geological Survey San Jose, CA 95134 6000 J Street, Placer Hall [email protected] Sacramento, CA 95818 [email protected] William Deutsch Auburn University John Duff 250 Upchurch Hall US Geological Survey Auburn University, AL 36849 345 Middlefield Road, MS439 [email protected] Menlo Park, CA 94025 [email protected] Lawrence DeWeese US Geological Survey Charles Dujardin PO Box 25046, MS406 Hydroqual Denver, CO 80225 1200 MacArthur Blvd [email protected] Mahwah, NJ 07430
Jerry Diamond Carmen Dumas Tetra Tech, Inc. City of Ann Arbor Water Plant 400 Red Brook Blvd., Ste 200 919 Sunset Road Owings Mills, MD 21117 Ann Arbor, MI 48103 [email protected] [email protected]
Gil Dichter Eric Dunlavey IDEXX City of San Jose One Idexx Drive 170 W. San Carlos Street Westbrook, ME 04092 San Jose, CA 95134 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 565 Shane Dunnaway Jim Eychaner Missouri Dept of Conservation US Geological Survey 1110 S. College Avenue 3020 State University Drive East Suite 3005 Columbia, MO 65201 Sacramento, CA 95819 [email protected] [email protected]
Don Dycus Tim Fahey Tennessee Valley Authority Table Mountain Rancheria 1101 Market Street, SP 50-C PO Box 410 Chattanooga, TN 37402 Friant, CA 93626 [email protected] [email protected]
Sandra Eberts Lynne Fahlquist US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 6480 Doubletree Avenue 8027 Exchange Drive Columbus, OH 43229 Austin, TX 78754 [email protected] [email protected]
Brad Eggleston Russell Fairey City of Palo Alto Moss Landing Marine Laboratories 2501 Embarcadero Way 7544 Sandholdt Road Palo Alto, CA 94303 Moss Landing, CA 95039 [email protected] [email protected]
Raymond Ellenwood James Falcone Nez Perce Tribe Water Resources US Geological Survey PO Box 365 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 413 Lapwai, ID 83540 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected] [email protected]
Eleanor Ely Chris Fall The Volunteer Monitor Newsletter BioQuip Products, Inc. 50 Benton Avenue 2321 Gladwick Street San Francisco, CA 94112 Rancho Dominquez, CA 90220 [email protected] [email protected]
Melenee Emanuel Ken Fall SWRCB BioQuip Products, Inc. 1001 I Street, 15th Floor 2321 Gladwick Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Rancho Dominquez, CA 90220 [email protected] [email protected]
Sandra Embrey Touraj Farahmand US Geological Survey Aquatic Informatics, Inc. 1201 Pacific Ave., Ste 600 210 - 1050 Homer Street Tacoma, WA 98402 Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9 [email protected] [email protected]
James Ervin Blake Farnsworth City of San Jose Campbell Scientific, Inc. 170 W. San Carlos Street 815 W. 1800 N. San Jose, CA 95134 Logan, UT 84321 [email protected] [email protected]
Roy Erwin Ron Faubion National Park Service, WRD JBS Energy, Inc. 1201 Oakridge Dr., Ste 250 311 D Street, Ste. A Fort Collins, CO 80525 West Sacramento, CA 95605 [email protected] [email protected]
Don Essig John Fazio Idaho Dept of Environmetntal Quality Arkansas Dept Environmental Quality 1410 N. Hilton PO Box 8913 Boise, ID 83706 Little Rock, AR 72219 [email protected] [email protected]
Scott Evans Suzanne Femmer Chipotle Business Group, Inc. US Geological Survey 121 West Park Row Drive Water Science Center 1400 Independence Rd, MS100 Arlington, TX 76010 Rolla, MO 65401 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 566 Steven Fend Jill Frankforter US Geological Surey Nebraska Water Science Center 345 Middlefield Rd, M/S 465 5231 South 19th Street Menlo Park, CA 94025 Lincoln, NE 68512 [email protected] [email protected]
Arleen Feng Jessica Franks Alameda County Public Works Agency US Environmental Protection Agency 951 Turner Court, Rm 300 1445 Ross Avenue Hayward, CA 94945 Dallas, TX 75202 [email protected] [email protected]
Frank Fetter Jeffrey Frey Wisconsin Dept Natural Resources US Geological Survey 1100 Spellman Street 5957 Lakeside Blvd Mt. Horeb, WI 53572 Indianapolis, IN 46278 [email protected] [email protected]
Rick Fielder Greg Fuhrer YSI Incorporated US Geological Survey 1725 Brannum Lane WRD, Oregon Water Science Center 10615 SE Cherry Yellow Springs, OH 45387 Blossom [email protected] Portland, OR 97216 [email protected] Dennis Finnegan US Geological Survey Susan Gale 6480 Doubletree Avenue North Carolina Dept Environmental Regulations Columbus, OH 43229 Mail Service Center 1650 [email protected] Raleigh, NC 27699 [email protected] Jeffrey Fischer US Geological Survey Walter Galloway 810 Bear Tavern Road, Ste 206 US Environmental Protection Agency West Trenton, NJ 08628 Atlantic Ecology Division 27 Tarzwell Drive [email protected] Narragansett, RI 02882 [email protected] Chuck Fisher US Geological Survey Art Garceau 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive Indiana Dept Environmental Management Portland, OR 97216 3139 Lickridge Lane [email protected] Danville, IN 46122 [email protected] Sarah Flanagan US Geological Survey Ann Garceau 361 Commerce Way 3139 Lickridge Lane Pembroke, NH 03275 Danville, IN 46122 [email protected] Angela Gellatly Terrence Fleming Wet Labs US EPA, Region 9 PO Box 518 75 Hawthorne Street Philamath, OR 97370 San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] [email protected] Jeroen Gerritsen Stephanie Fong Tetra Tech, Inc. SVRWQCB 400 Red Brook Blvd., #200 11020 Sun Centre Dr., Ste 200 Owings Mills, MD 21117 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 [email protected] [email protected] Elise Giddings Bill Foreman US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 3916 Sunset Ridge Road Box 25046, MS 407 Denver Federal Center Raleigh, NC 27607 Denver, CO 80225 [email protected]
Philip Forsberg Sheryl Gill NALMS California Dept. of Pesticide Regulation PO Box 5443 Box 4015 Madison, WI 53705 Sacramento, CA 95812 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 567 Bob Gilliom Brian Gregory US Geological Survey US Geological Survey Placer Hall, 6000 J Street 3039 Amwiler Rd., Ste 130 Sacramento, CA 95819 Atlanta, GA 30360 [email protected] [email protected]
Patricia Ging Judy Griffin US Geological Survey National Water Quality Monitoring Council 8027 Exchange Drive 417 National Center Austin, TX 78754 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected] [email protected]
Steve Glodt Lindsay Griffith US Geological Survey Brown and Caldwell Box 25046, MS 407, Bldg 95 PO Box 550 Denver, CO 80225 Castle Rock, CO 80104 [email protected] [email protected]
Darryl Glover Leslie Grober Virginia Dept od Environmental Quality Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board PO Box 10009 11020 Sun Center Drive, #200 Richmond, VA 23240 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 [email protected] [email protected]
Kean Goh JoAnn Gronberg California Dept of Pesticide Regulation US Geological Survey PO Box 4015 345 Middlefield Road, MS470 Sacramento, CA 95812 Menlo Park, CA 94025 [email protected] [email protected]
Steven Goodbred George Groschen US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 3020 State University Dr. East, Ste 3005 1201 W. University Ave., Ste 100 Sacramento, CA 95819 Urbana, IL 61801 [email protected] [email protected]
Kimberly Gorman Cristina Grosso Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Estuary Institute 2501 Lake Tahoe Blvd 7770 Pardee Lane, 2nd Floor South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Oakland, CA 94621 [email protected] [email protected]
Richard Gossett Ben Grunewald CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. The Ground Water Protection Council 2020 Del Amo Blvd., Ste 200 13308 N. MacArthur Blvd. Torrance, CA 90501 Oklahoma City, OK 73142 [email protected] [email protected]
David Gratson Kristen Gunthardt Neptune and Company, Inc. US Environmental Protection Agency 1505 15th Street, Ste B 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Mail Code 4503T Los Alamos, NM 87544 Washington, DC 20460 [email protected] [email protected]
Linda Green Andrew Gunther USDA-CSREES Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Applied Marine Sciences University of Rhode Island CLK, 1 Greenhouse Road 4749 Bennett Dr., Ste L Kingston, RI 02881 Livermore, CA 94551 [email protected] [email protected]
Earl Greene Jason Gurdak US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive 436 National Center MS415 Denver Federal Center Reston, VA 20192 Lakewood, CO 80225 [email protected] [email protected]
Ben Greenfield Marty Gurtz SFEI US Geological Survey 7770 Pardee Lane, 2nd Floor 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 413 Oakland, CA 94621 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 568 William Hagan Janet Hashimoto San Jose State University Foundation US Environemental Protection Agency, Region 9 8101 31st Avenue NE 75 Hawthorne Street (WTR-2) Seattle, WA 98115 San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] [email protected]
Juli Hambrook Berkman Charles Hawkins US Geological Survey Utah State University 6480 Doubletree Avenue 5210 Old Main Hill Columbus, OH 43229 Logan, UT 84322 [email protected] [email protected]
Timmarie Hamill Gretchen Hayslip Big Chiro Creek Watershed Alliance US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1282 Filbert Avenue 1200 Sixth Ave Mail Code OEA-095 Chico, CA 95926 Seattle, WA 98101 [email protected] [email protected]
Pixie Hamilton Robert Hearne 1730 E. Parham Road North Dakota State University Richmond, VA 23228 PO Box 5636 [email protected] Fargo, ND 58105 [email protected] Tracy Hancock US Geological Survey Gary Heathman 1730 E. Parham Road USDA-ARS Richmond, VA 23228 275 S. Russell Street [email protected] West Lafayette, IN 47907 [email protected] Steve Hanson Oregon Dept of Environmental Quality Camille Heaton 1712 SW 11th Avenue RTI International Portland, OR 97201 701 13th Street, NW Ste. 750 [email protected] Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] Daren Harmel USDA-ARS Steve Heiskary 808 E. Blackland Road NALMS Temple, TX 76502 572 Arrowhead Court [email protected] Leno Lakes, MN 55014 [email protected] Doug Harned US Geological Survey Dennis Helsel 3916 Sunset Ridge Road US Geological Survey Raleigh, NC 27607 PO Box 25046, MS 964 Lakewood, CO 80225 Jason Harrington [email protected] Greenspan Analytical c/o Goyen Valve Corp 1195 Airport Road Dan Helsel Lakewood, NJ 08701 Wisconsin Dept Natural Resources [email protected] 910 Hwy 54 Black River Falls, WI 54615 Mitch Harris [email protected] US Geological Survey 1201 W. University Ave., Ste 100 Joseph Henderson Urbana, IL 61801 US Geological Survey [email protected] 231 National Center Reston, VA 20192 Robert Hart [email protected] US Geological Survey 2255 N. Gemini Drive David Herbst Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Sierra Nevada Aquatic Research Lab [email protected] Route 1, Box 198 Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 Paula Hartzell [email protected] US Environmental Protection Agency Western Ecology Division 200 SW 35th Street Lillian Herger Corvallis, OR 97333 US Environmental Protection Agencey, Region 10 [email protected] 1200 Sixth Ave., Mail Code: OEA-095 Seattle, WA 98101 [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 569 Alan Herlihy Robert Hirsch Oregon State University US Geological Survey Dept Fish & Wildlife Nash 104 409 National Center Corvallis, OR 97331 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected] [email protected]
Laura Herman Kerie Hitt UW Stevens Point Extension US Geological Survey 800 Reserve Street 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive 413 National Center Stevens Point, WI 54481 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected] [email protected]
Elizabeth Herron Rainer Hoenicke USDA-CSREES Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring San Francisco Estuary Institute University of Rhode Island CLK, 1 Greenhouse Road 7770 Pardee Lane Kingston, RI 02881 Oakland, CA 94621 [email protected] [email protected]
Bev Herzog Dwight Holford National Ground Water Association Upper Putah Creek Stewardship 601 Dempsey Road Box 27 Westerville, OH 43081 Middletown, CA 95461 [email protected] [email protected]
Andy Hickey John Hollister US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 3039 Amwiler Road, Ste 130 8505 Research Way Atlanta, GA 30360 Middleton, WI 53562 [email protected] [email protected]
Ward Hickman Elizabeth Holtz US Geological Survey El Dorado Irrigation District 810 Bear Tavern Road 2890 Mosquito Road West Trenton, NJ 08628 Placerville, CA 95667 [email protected] [email protected]
Jeff Hieronymus Anne Hoos Charlotte Storm Water Services US Geological Survey 600 East Fourth Street 640 Grassmere Park, Ste 100 Charlotte, NC 28202 Nashville, TN 37211 [email protected] [email protected]
Joanne Hild Bridget Hoover Friends of Deer Creek Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary 132 Main Street 299 Foam Street Nevada City, CA 95959 Monterey, CA 93940 [email protected] [email protected]
Jason Hill Jessica Hopple Virginia Dept Environmental Quality-WCRO US Geological Survey 3019 Peters Creek Road 810 Bear Tavern Road, Ste 206 Roanoke, VA 24019 West Trenton, NJ 08628 [email protected] [email protected]
Brian Hill Paul Horvatin US Environmental Protection Agency US Environmental Protection Agency 6201 Congdon Blvd 77 W. Jackson Blvd Duluth, MN 55804 Chicago, IL 60604 [email protected] [email protected]
JoEllen Hinck Mellony Hoskinson US Geological Survey RTI International 4200 New Haven Road 701 13th Street, NW Ste. 750 Columbia, MO 65201 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] [email protected]
Stephen Hinkle Clay Houston US Geological Survey West River Watershed Alliance 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive 28 Vernon Street, Ste 332 Portland, OR 97216 Brattleborn, VT 05301 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 570 Rebecca Houtman Hank Johnson Pueblo of Santa Ana US Geological Survey 02 Dove Road 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive Santa Ana Peublo, NM 87004 Portland, OR 97216 [email protected] [email protected]
Lisa Huff Tom Johnson Alabama Dept Environmental Management US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Region 8 1890 Dickinson Drive 999 18th Street, Ste 300 Montgomery, AL 36109 Denver, CO 80202 [email protected] [email protected]
Brian Hughes Tammy Jones-Lepp US Geological Survey US Environmental Protection Agency 3039 Amwiler Road, Ste 130 944 E. Harmon Avenue Atlanta, GA 30360 Las Vegas, NV 89119 [email protected] [email protected]
Charles Hunt Ryan Jorgensen US Geological Survey Gold Systems, Inc. USGS Pacific Islands Water Science Center 677 Ala Moana 3330 S. 700 E, Ste F Blvd., Ste 415 Salt Lake City, UT 84106 Honolulu, HI 96813 [email protected] [email protected] Celeste Journey Carlton Hunt US Geological Survey Battelle 720 Gracern Road, Ste 129 397 Washington Street Columbia, SC 29210 Duxbury, MA 02324 [email protected] [email protected] Billy Justus Jennifer Hunt US Geological Survey San Francisco Estuary Institute 401 Hardin Road 7770 Pardee Lane Little Rock, AR 72211 Oakland, CA 94621 [email protected] [email protected] Steve Kalkhoff Lauren Imgrund US Geological Survey The Alliance for Aquatic Resource Monitoring PO Box 1230 Dickinson College PO Box 1773 Iowa City, IA 52244 Carlisle, PA 17013 [email protected] [email protected] Mary Karius Nenad Iricanin Minnesota Waters SFWMD 3440 Sunset Ridge Road 3301 Gun Club Road, MS4642 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 [email protected] [email protected] Brian Katz Wayne Jamieson US Geological Survey ROM Communications 2010 Levy Avenue 12705 65th Street Tallahassee, FL 32310 Edmonton, AB T5A 0Z4 [email protected] [email protected] Revital Katznelson Lawrence Johmann State Water Resources Control Board Guadalupe-Coyote Resource Conservation District c/o SFBWQCB 1515 Clay St., Ste 1400 888 N. First St, Rm 204 Oakland, CA 94612 San Jose, CA 95112 [email protected] [email protected] Leon Kauffman Toni Johnson US Geological Survey National Water Quality Monitoring Council 810 Bear Tavern Road, Ste 206 119 National Center 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive West Trenton, NJ 08628 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected] [email protected]
Ed Johnson Alo Kauravlla NOAA/NOS/NCCOS City of San Jose 1305 East-West Highway N/SCI 1, Room 131 700 Los Esteros Road Silver Spring, MD 20910 San Jose, CA 95134 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 571 Richard Keck Stacy Kinsey Cherokee Nation US Geological Survey PO Box 948 1728 Lampman Drive, Ste D Tahlequah, OK 74465 Billings, MT 59102 [email protected] [email protected]
Larry Keith Ann Kitajima Instant Reference Sources, Inc. Morro Bay National Estuary Program 329 Claiborne Way 601 Embarcadero, Ste 11 Monroe, GA 30655 Morro Bay, CA 93442 [email protected] [email protected]
John Kelly Mary Klett US Environmental Protection Agency Versar, Inc. 6201 Langdon Blvd. 9200 Rumsey Road Duluth, MN 55804 Columbia, MD 21045 [email protected] [email protected]
Jonathan Kennen Linda Koch US Geological Survey Hawaii State Department of Hawaii 810 Bear Tavern Road, Ste 206 919 Ala Moana Blvd., Rm. 312 West Trenton, NJ 08628 Honolulu, HI 96814 [email protected] [email protected]
Joseph Kerski Jill Komoto US Geological Survey Hawaii Dept of Land & Natural Resources Box 25046 MS 507 1151 Punchbowl St, #330 Denver, CO 80225 Honolulu, HI 96813 [email protected] [email protected]
Brannon Ketcham Courtney Kowalczak Point Reyes National Seashore Fond du Lac Tribal & Community College 1 Bear Valley Road 2101 14th Street Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 Cloquet, MN 55720 [email protected] [email protected]
Andrew Kett Stephen Kraemer Citizens' Environment Watch US Environmental Protection Agency 401 Richmond Street, W, Ste 380 960 College Station Road Toronto, ON M5V 3A8 Athens, GA 30605 [email protected] [email protected]
Megan Kilner Charlie Kratzer San Jose State University Foundation US Geological Survey Moss Landing Marine Labs 7919 34th Ave SW Placer Hall 6000 J Street Seattle, WA 98126 Sacramento, CA 95819 [email protected] [email protected]
Moon Kim Tim Kresse US Geological Survey Arkansas Dept Environmental Quality 5957 Lakeside Blvd. PO Box 8913 Indianapolis, IN 46278 Little Rock, AR 72219 [email protected] [email protected]
Scott King Brad Krimmel IDEXX Eureka Environmental One Idexx Drive 2113 Wells Branch Pkwy, Ste 4400 Westbrook, ME 04092 Austin, TX 78728 [email protected] [email protected]
Jim Kingsbury Richard Kropp US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 640 Grassmere Park Rd, Ste 100 New Jersey Water Science Center 810 Bear Tavern Road, Nashville, TN 37211 Ste 206 [email protected] West Trenton, NJ 08628 [email protected] Sandra Kinnaman US Geological Survey Allison Kunze 224 W. Central Pkwy, Ste 1006 US Geological Survey Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 6480 Doubletree Avenue [email protected] Columbus, OH 43229 [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 572 Jacob LaFontaine Dolores Leonard US Geological Survey CICEET 3039 Amwiler Rd., Ste 130 University of New Hampshire Gregg Hall, 35 Colovos Road Atlanta, GA 30360 Durham, NH 03824 [email protected] [email protected]
Jim Laine, Jr. Erik Leppo West Virginia Dept Environmental Protection Tetra Tech, Inc. 601 57th Street 400 Rod Brook Blvd., Ste 200 Charleston, WV 25304 Owings Mills, MD 21117 [email protected] [email protected]
Thomas Lake Fred Leslie St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Environment Division Alabama Dept Environmental Management 82 Indian Village Road PO Box 301463 Akwesasne, NY 13655 Montgomery, AL 36130 [email protected] [email protected]
Andrew LaMotte Tommy Liddell US Geological Survey Ventura County Watershed Protection 8987 Yellow Brick Road 800 S. Victoria Avenue Baltimore, MD 21237 Venture, CA 93009 [email protected] [email protected]
Matthew Landon Hong Lin US Geological Survey CDS Technologies 4165 Spruance Rd., Ste 200 16360 Monterey Rd., Ste 250 San Diego, CA 92101 Morgan Hill, CA 95037 [email protected] [email protected]
Steve Lanigan Richard Lindgren US Forest Service US Geological Survey 333 SW First Avenue 5563 De Zavalla, Ste 290 Portland, OR 97208 San Antonio, TX 78249 [email protected] [email protected]
Wayne Lapham Bruce Lindsey US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 413 National Center 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive 1215 Lime Kiln Road Reston, VA 20192 New Cumberland, PA 17070 [email protected] [email protected]
Karen Larsen Linda Lindstrom Central Valley Regional Water Board SFWMD 11020 Sun Center Drive, Ste 200 3301 Gun Club Road, MS4610 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 [email protected] [email protected]
Tim Lathrop Jerry Liner US Geological Survey Tennessee Valley Authority 5957 Lakeside Blvd 1101 Market Street, SP 50-C Indianapolis, IN 46278 Chattanooga, TN 37402 [email protected] [email protected]
Stephen Lawrence Gary Lippner US Geological Survey CDS Technologies 3039 Amwiler Rd., Ste 130 16360 Monterey Rd., Ste 250 Atlanta, GA 30360 Morgan Hill, CA 95037 [email protected] [email protected]
David Lee Yaping Liu YSI Incorporated Santa Clara Valley Water District 1725 Brannum Lane 5750 Almaden Expressway Yellow Springs, OH 45387 San Jose, CA 95118 [email protected] [email protected]
Sarah Lehman Barbara Liukkonen US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 University of Minnesota Water Resources Center 77 W. Jackson Blvd (WQ-16J) 173 McNeal Hall 1985 Buford Avenue Chicago, IL 60604 St. Paul, MN 55108 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 573 Barry Long Richard Marella National Park Service US Geological Survey Water Resources Division 1201 Oakridge Drive, Ste 250 2010 Levy Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80525 Tallahassee, FL 32310 [email protected] [email protected]
Walton Low Wayne Maresch U. S. Geological Survey Missouri Dept Natural Resources 119 National Center 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive PO Box 176 Reston, VA 20192 Jefferson City, MO 65102 [email protected] [email protected]
Sarah Lowe Terry Maret San Francisco Estuary Institute US Geological Survey 7770 Pardee Lane 230 Collins Road Oakland, CA 94621 Boise, ID 83702 [email protected] [email protected]
George Lu Andrew Marr Goodxense, Inc. Greater Vancouver Regional District 730 E. Evelyn Ave., #137 4330 Kingsway Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Burnaby, BC V5H 4G8 [email protected] [email protected]
Angel Luke Edwin Martinez Teledyne ISCO University of Puerto Rico 4700 Superior Street PO Box 40 Lincoln, NE 68504 Sabana Grande, Puerto Rico, 00637 [email protected] [email protected]
Jim Lyons Roxie Martinez Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Table Mountain Rancheria 320 W 4th St., Ste 200 PO Box 410 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Friant, CA 93626 [email protected] [email protected]
Barbara Mahler Jason May US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 8027 Exchange Drive Placer Hall, 6000 J Street Austin, TX 78754 Sacramento, CA 95819 [email protected] [email protected]
Mike Mak Alice Mayio Rutgers University US Environmental Protection Agency 14 College Farm Road Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Washington, DC 20460 [email protected] [email protected]
Gail Mallard Michael McBride National Water Quality Monitoring Council GFS Chemicals, Inc. 119 National Center 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive Water Monitoring Division 851 McKinley Avenue Reston, VA 20192 Columbus, OH 43222 [email protected] [email protected]
Robert Malone Dena McCann USDA-ARS State Water Resources Control Board 2150 Pammel Drive 1001 I Street, 15th Floor Ames, IA 50011 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] [email protected]
Howard Mann Ellen McCarron Hydroscientific West Florida Dept Environmental Protection 13135 Danielson St., Ste 207 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS 235 Poway, CA 92064 Tallahassee, FL 32399 [email protected] [email protected]
Bill Mann Kathleen McCarthy In-Situ, Inc. US Geological Survey 221 E. Lincoln Avenue 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive Fort Collins, CO 80524 Portland, OR 97216 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 574 Casey McCormack Chris Millard Nez Perce Tribe Maryland Dept Natural Resources Dept of Water Resources 114 Veterans Drive 580 Taylor Ave., C-2 Lapwai, ID 83540 Annapolis, MD 21401 [email protected] [email protected]
Susan McCormick Larry Miller Georgetown Divide RCD/Tracks Teledyne ISCO 100 Forni Road, Ste. A 4700 Superior Street Placerfille, CA 95667 Lincoln, NE 68504 [email protected] [email protected]
Robin McCraw Brady Miller California State Water Resources Control Board Astoria-Pacific International PO Box 100 PO Box 830 Sacramento, CA 95812 Clackamas, OR 97015 [email protected] [email protected]
Leslie McGeorge Tim Miller New Jersey Dept Environmental Protection US Geological Survey PO Box 409 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS412 Trenton, NJ 08625 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected] [email protected]
Lester McKee Don Molnar San Francisco Estuary Institute Oklahoma Dept of Ag, Food & Forestry 7770 Pardee Lane, 2nd Floor Rt 1, Box 245 Oakland, CA 94621 Fay, OK 73646 [email protected] [email protected]
Aubrey McMahon Stephen Monroe New York City Conservation District National Park Service 121 Sixth Ave., Ste 501 PO Box 517 New York, NY 10013 Flagstaff, AZ 86002 [email protected] [email protected]
Michael Meador Jean-Ann Moon US Geological Survey Marshall County Retired and Senior Volunteer Program 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 413 1805 Gunter Avenue Reston, VA 20192 Guntersville, AL 35976 [email protected] [email protected]
Christopher Mebane Rob Mooney US Geological Survey In-Situ, Inc. 230 Collins Road 221 E. Lincoln Avenue Boise, ID 83702 Fort Collins, CO 80524 [email protected] [email protected]
Edmund Merem Richard Moore Jackson State University US Geological Survey 3825 Ridgewood Rd., Box 23 361 Commerce Way Jackson, MS 39211 Pembroke, NH 03275 [email protected] [email protected]
Nancy Mesner Michelle Moorman Utah State University US Geological Survey 5210 Old Main Hill 3916 Sunset Ridge Road Logan, UT 84322 Raleigh, NC 27607 [email protected] [email protected]
Donna Meyers Susan Mora Loyko NOAA City of Stockton National Marine Sanctuary Program 55D Municipal Wharf 2500 Navy Drive Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Stockton, CA 95206 [email protected] [email protected]
Rob Middlemis-Brown Jean Moran US Geological Survey Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory PO Box 1230 L-231 PO Box 808 Iowa City, IA 52240 Livermore, CA 94550 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 575 Michael Moran Susan Myers US Geological Survey Pinelles County Dept Environmental Management 1608 Mountain View Road 300 S. Garden Avenue Rapid City, SD 57702 Clearwater, FL 33756 [email protected] [email protected]
Patrick Moran Donna Myers US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 1201 Pacific Ave., Ste 600 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 413 Tacoma, WA 98402 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected] [email protected]
Jim Moring Naomi Nakagaki US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 8027 Exchange Drive Placer Hall, 6000 J Street Austin, TX 78754 Sacramento, CA 95819 [email protected] [email protected]
Steve Moulton Greg Nalley US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 413 National Center 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive 400 S. Clinton Street Reston, VA 20192 Iowa City, IA 52240 [email protected] [email protected]
John Mullaney Mark Nardi US Geological Survey US Geological Survey Water Science Center 101 Pitkin Street 1289 McD Drive East Hartford, CT 06108 Dover, DE 19901 [email protected] [email protected]
Michael Mulvey Ron Nauman Oregon Dept Environmental Quality Hydroscientific West 2020 SW 4th Ave., Ste 400 13135 Danielson St., Ste 207 Portland, OR 97201 Poway, CA 92064 [email protected] [email protected]
Sean Mundell Melanie Neilson San Jose State University Foundation Environment Canada 7544 Sandholdt Road PO Box 5050 Moss Landing, CA 95039 Burlington, ON L7R 4A6 sean@mundell. [email protected]
Mark Munn Mary Anne Nelson US Geological Survey Idaho Dept of Environmental Quality 1201 Pacific Ave., Ste 600 1410 N. Hilton Tacoma, WA 98402 Boise, ID 83706 [email protected] [email protected]
Peter Murdoch George Nichol US Geological Survey State Water Resources Control Board 425 Jordan Road 1001 I St., 15th Floor Troy, NY 12180 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] [email protected]
Brooke Murray Rachel Noble Eureka Environmental UNC Chapel Hill 2113 Wells Branch Pkwy, Ste 4400 Institute of Marine Science 3431 Arendell Street Austin, TX 78728 Morehead City, NC 28557 [email protected] [email protected]
Steve Murray Bernard Nolan Cal State Fullerton US Geological Survey 800 N. State College Road 413 National Center Fullerton, CA 92831 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected] [email protected]
Rosemary Musson Ginger North U. S. Geological Survey Delaware Nature Society 119 National Center 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive PO Box 700 Reston, VA 20192 Hockessin, DE 19707 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 576 Lisa Nowell Neil Panton US Geological Survey San Gregorio Environmental Resource Center Placer Hall, 6000 J Street PO Box 49 Sacramento, CA 95819 San Gregorio, CA 94074 [email protected] [email protected]
Eric O'Brien Dave Paradies Iowa Dept Natural Resources The Bay Foundation 109 Trowbridge Hall 875 Santa Ysabel, #16 Iowa City, IA 52747 Los Osos, CA 93402 [email protected] [email protected]
Robin O'Malley Suzanne Paschke The Heinz Center US Geological Survey 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Ste 735 South Denver Federal Center, MS415 PO Box 25046 Washington, DC 20004 Lakewood, CO 80225 [email protected] [email protected]
Steven O'Shields Renee Paterson I.M. Systems Group, Inc. Newfoundland & Labrador DEC 2234 South Hobson Avenue PO Box 8700 Charleston, SC 29405 St. Johns, Newfoundland & Labrador, A1B 4J6 steven.o'[email protected] [email protected]
Callie Oblinger Angela Paul US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 3916 Sunset Ridge Road 2730 N. Deer Run Road Raleigh, NC 27607 Carson City, NV 89701 [email protected] [email protected]
Tim Oden Warren Paul US Geological Survey Water Resources Nez Perce Tribe 19241 David Memorial Drive, Ste 180 PO Box 365 Shenandoah, TX 77385 Lapwai, ID 83540 [email protected] [email protected]
Tony Olsen Anitra Pawley US Environmental Protection Agency University of California, Davis Western Ecology Division 200 SW 35th Street 709 N Street Corvallis, OR 97333 Davis, CA 95616 [email protected] [email protected]
George Onwumere Peter Penoyer Washington State Dept of Ecology National Park Service PO Box 47710 1201 Oakridge Dr., Ste 250 Olympia, WA 98504 Fort Collins, CO 80525 [email protected] [email protected]
John Oram Matt Perry San Francisco Estuary Institute Campbell Scientific, Inc. 7770 Pardee Lane 815 W. 1800 N. Oakland, CA 94621 Logan, UT 84321 [email protected] [email protected]
Steven Osborn Leslie Perry City of San Jose San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board 170 W. San Carlos Street 1515 Clay St., Ste 1400 San Jose, CA 95134 Oakland, CA 94612 [email protected] [email protected]
Lantis Osemwengie Charles Peters US Environmental Protection Agency US Geological Survey 944 E. Harmon Avenue 2020 Chamberlain Avenue Las Vegas, NV 89119 Madison, WI 53726 [email protected] [email protected]
Hans Paerl Jim Petersen University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill US Geological Survey 3431 Arendell Street 401 Hardin Road Morehead City, NC 28557 Little Rock, AR 72211 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 577 Dave Peterson Alison Purcell US Geological Survey University California Berkeley 2617 E. Lincolnway, Ste B 2716 Webster Street, #2 Cheyenne, WY 82001 Berkeley, CA 94705 [email protected] [email protected]
Florence Phillips Ed Quilty St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Aquatic Informatics, Inc. 412 State Route 37 210-1050 Homer Street Akwesasne, NY 13655 Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9 [email protected] [email protected]
Malia Pickering Carla Quinn Table Mountain Rancheria Army Corps of Engineers PO Box 410 10 South Howard Street, Rm. 10700-N Friant, CA 93626 Baltimore, MD 21201 [email protected] [email protected]
Amy Picotte Dan Radulescu Vermont Agency of Natural Resources 22276 Macfarlane Drive Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Waterburg, VT 05671 [email protected] [email protected] Paul Randall Roger Pierno Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Program Santa Clara Valley Water District 1410 Jackson Street 5750 Almaden Expressway Oakland, CA 94612 San Jose, CA 95118 [email protected] [email protected] Beau Ranheim Jason Pinchback New York City Dept Environmental Protection Texas State University Marine Sciences Section 601 University Drive Wards Island, NY 10035 San Marcos, TX 78166 [email protected] [email protected] Del Rasmussen Stephen Porter State Water Rresources Control Board US Geological Survey 1001 I Street Box 25046, MS 406, DFC Sacramento, CA 95814 Lakewood, CO 80225 [email protected] [email protected] Teresa Rasmussen Marie-Florence Pouet US Geological Survey Universite de Sherbrooke 4821 Quail Crest Place Departement de genie civil Lawrence, KS 66049 Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1 [email protected]
James Powars Alan Rea City of San Jose Environmental Services US Geological Survey 700 Los Esteros Rd 230 Collins Road San Jose, CA 95134 Boise, ID 83702 [email protected] [email protected]
Stephen Preston Richard Rebich US Geological Survey US Geological Survey US EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office 410 Severn 308 South Airport Road Avenue Jackson, MS 39208 Annapolis, MD 21403 [email protected] [email protected] Michael Reddy Curtis Price US Geological Survey US Geological Survey PO Box 25046 Denver Federal Center, MS 418 1608 Mountain View Road Denver, CO 80225 Rapid City, SD 57702 [email protected] [email protected] Garth Redfield Suzee Puckett South Florida Water Management Fond du Lac Tribal & Community College 3301 Gun Club Road 2101 14th Street West Palm Beach, FL 33416 Cloquet, MN 55720 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 578 Jason Redwood Karen Riva-Murray Solinst Canada, Ltd. US Geological Survey 35 Todd Road 425 Jordan Road Georgetown, ON L7G 4R8 Troy, NY 12180 [email protected] [email protected]
Nicole Reid Dale Robertson Michigan State University US Geological Survey Land and Water Program 3700 E. Gull Lake Drive 8505 Research Way Hickory Corners, MI 49060 Middleton, WI 53562 [email protected] [email protected]
Ann Reid Anne Rogers UNH Cooperative Extension Kingman Farm Hse/UNH Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Kingman Farm Hse/UNH PO Box 13087 Durham, NH 03824 Austin, TX 78756 [email protected] [email protected]
Chris Reimer Christine Rohrer National Ground Water Association Colorado State University 601 Dempsey Road Dept of Civil Engineering Westerville, OH 43081 Fort Collins, CO 80523 [email protected] [email protected]
Dave Reutter Richard Rollins US Geological Survey HOH Corporation 6480 Doubletree Avenue 1259 El Camino Real, #124 Columbus, OH 43229 Menlo Park, CA 94025 [email protected] Gayle Rominger Emilie Reyes YSI Incorporated State Water Resources Control Board 1725 Brannum Lane 1001 I Street, 15th Floor Yellow Springs, OH 45387 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] [email protected] Michael Rosen Pete Richards US Geological Survey Heidelberg College 2730 N. Deer Run Road National Center for Water Quality Research 310 E. Market Carson City, NV 89701 Street [email protected] Tiffin, OH 44883 [email protected] Gary Rosenlieb National Park Service Bill Richardson 1201 Oakridge Drive US Geological Survey Fort Collins, CO 80525 Upper Midwest Environ. Sci. Ctr. 2630 Fanta Reed Road [email protected] LaCrosse, WI 54603 [email protected] Amanda Ross Lower Colorado River Authority Bill Richardson 3700 Lake Austin Blvd., L421 Philadelphia Water Department Austin, TX 78703 1500 E. Hunting Park Avenue [email protected] Philadelphia, PA 19124 [email protected] Barbara Rowe US Geological Survey Joseph Richardson 1608 Mountain View Road Savannah State University Rapid City, SD 57702 PO Box 20583, Marine Sciences [email protected] Savannah, GA 31404 [email protected] Gary Rowe US Geological Survey Rawlin Richardson Denver Federal Center PO Box 25046, MS 406 Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Denver, CO 80225 PO Box C [email protected] Warm Springs, OR 97761 [email protected] Timothy Rowe US Geological Survey Joseph Rinella 2730 N. Deer Run Road US Geological Survey Carson City, NV 89701 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive [email protected] Portland, OR 97216 [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 579 Peter Ruhl Hiram Sarabia US Geological Survey University of California, San Diego 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 413 9500 Gilman Drive, #0517 Reston, VA 20192 La Jolla, CA 92093 [email protected] [email protected]
Sergio Ruiz Cordova Pierre Sargent Auburn University US Geological Survey 250 Upchurch Hall 3535 S. Sherwood Forest Blvd., Ste 120 Auburn University, AL 36849 Baton Rouge, LA 70816 [email protected] [email protected]
Michael Rupert Peter Schafer US Geological Survey City of San Jose 201 West 8th Street, Ste 200 170 W. San Carlos Street Pueblo, CO 81003 San Jose, CA 95134 [email protected] [email protected]
Gregory Rusiano Kirk Schmidt Rutgers University Central Coast Water Quality Preservation, Inc. 14 College Farm Road PO Box 1049 New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Watsonville, CA 95077 [email protected] Bob Schott Eric Russell Pennsylvania Dept Environmental Protection Surfrider Foundation 909 Elmerton Avenue 2222 East Cliff Drive, #234B Harrisburg, PA 17110 Santa Cruz, CA 95062 [email protected] [email protected] Kenneth Schreiber Philip Russell Wisconsin Dept Natural Resources Littleton/Englewood WWTP 1300 W. Clairemont Avenue 2900 S. Platte River Drive Eau Claire, WI 54702 Englewood, CO 80110 [email protected] [email protected] Gregory Schwarz David Saad US Geological Survey US Geological Survey MS 413, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive 8505 Research Way Reston, VA 20192 Middleton, WI 53562 [email protected] [email protected] Robert Schweinfurth Michael Sadar Water Environment Federation Hach Company 601 Wythe Street 5600 Lindbergh Drive Alexandria, VA 22314 Loveland, CO 80539 [email protected] [email protected] Mateo Scoggins Jesus Saldana City of Austin Teledyne ISCO US Geological Society-N 4700 Superior Street 505 Barton Springs Road, 11th Floor Lincoln, NE 68504 Austin, TX 78704 [email protected] [email protected]
Tom Sanders Elisabeth Scribner Colorado State University US Geological Survey Department of Civil Engineering 4821 Quail Crest Place Fort Collins, CO 80523 Lawrence, KS 66049 [email protected] Barbara Scudder Mark Sandstrom US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 8505 Research Way Box 25046, MS 407 Denver Federal Center Middleton, WI 53562 Denver, CO 80225 [email protected]
Edward Santoro Meg Sedlek Delaware River Basin Commission San Francisco Estuary Institute PO Box 7360 7770 Pardee Lane West Trenton, NJ 08628 Oakland, CA 94621 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 580 Lynette Seigley Richard Smith Iowa Dept Natural Resources US Geological Survey 109 Trowbridge Hall MS 413 National Center Iowa City, IA 52242 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected] [email protected]
Mark Serres Corky Snipes Utility Systems Science & Software Tennessee Valley Authority 2101 E. 4th Street, Ste 130A 1101 Market Street, SP 50-C Santa Ana, CA 92705 Chattanooga, TN 37402 mark.serres@su [email protected]
Tony Shaw Cheryl Snyder Pennsylvania Dept Environmental Protection Pennsylvania Dept Environmental Protection 400 Market Street, 11th Floor PO Box 8555 Harrisburg, PA 17105 Harrisburg, PA 17105 [email protected] [email protected]
Jennifer Shelton Brian Soenen US Geological Survey Iowa Dept Natural Resources 6000 J Street, Placer Hall 3625 Nebraska Street Sacramento, CA 95819 Sioux City, IA 51104 [email protected] [email protected]
Robert Sheridan Chris Sommers ETA Professionals/USGS EOA, Inc. 224 W. Central Pkwy, Ste 1006 1410 Jackson Street Altamonte Springs, FL 32771 Oakland, CA 94612 [email protected] [email protected]
Merle Shockey Deb Soule US Geological Survey New Hampshire DES PO Box 25046, MS 407/DFC, Bldg. 95 PO Box 95 Denver, CO 80225 Concord, NH 03302 [email protected] [email protected]
Terry Short Mark Southerland US Geological Survey Versar, Inc. 345 Middlefield Road, MS 470 9200 Rumsey Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Columbia, MD 21045 [email protected] [email protected]
Marco Sigala Norman Spahr Moss Landing Marine Labs US Geological Survey 7544 Sandholdt Road Bldg 53, MS 415, DFC Moss Landing, CA 95039 Lakewood, CO 80225 [email protected] [email protected]
Kevin Simpson Charles Spooner Chipotle Business Group, Inc. US Environmental Protection Agency 8124 Zimple Street 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (4503T) New Orleans, LA 70118 Washington, DC 20460 [email protected] [email protected]
Ken Skach Lori Sprague US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive Denver Federal Center, Bldg. 53, Portland, OR 97216 MS 415 [email protected] Lakewood, CO 80225 [email protected] Kenneth Skinner US Geological Survey Louisa Squires 230 Collins Road Santa Clara Valley Water District Boise, ID 83702 5750 Almaden Expressway [email protected] San Jose, CA 95118 [email protected] Mary Skopec Iowa Dept Natural Resources Paul Stackelberg 109 Trowbridge Hall US Geological Survey Iowa City, IA 52242 425 Jordan Road [email protected] Troy, NY 12180 [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 581 Gregory Stanton Sylvia Stork US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 8027 Exchange Drive Placer Hall, 6000 J Street Austin, TX 78754 Sacramento, CA 95819 [email protected] [email protected]
James Stark Whitney Stringfield US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 2280 Woodale Drive 720 Gracern Road Mounds View, MN 55112 Columbia, SC 29063 [email protected] [email protected]
Jeff Starn Dave Struve US Geological Survey SFWMD 101 Pitkin Street 1480 Skeis Road, #9, MS4631 East Hartford, CT 06108 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 [email protected] [email protected]
Keith Starner Tom Suk California Dept of Pesticide Regulation Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board PO Box 4015 2501 Lake Tahoe Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95812 South Lake Tahoe, CA 96158 [email protected] [email protected]
Gregory Steele Dan Sullivan US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 5231 S. 19th Street 8505 Research Way Lincoln, NE 68512 Middleton, WI 53562 [email protected] [email protected]
Kristine Stepenuck Kevin Summers University of Wisconsin-Extension US Environmental Protection Agency 1545 Observatory Drive, Rm 210 1 Sabine Island Drive Madison, WI 53706 Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 [email protected] [email protected]
Predrag Stevanovic Karen Taberski San Francisco Estuary Institute San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board 7770 Pardee 1515 Clay St, 14th Floor Oakland, CA 94621 Oakland, CA 94612 [email protected] [email protected]
Edith Stevens Dawit Tadesse League of Women Voters of PA California State Water Resources Control Board RR 1, Box 1550 1001 "I" Street Cresco, PA` 18326 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] [email protected]
Jana Stewart Mary Tappel US Geological Survey State Water Resources Control Board 8505 Research Way 1001 'I' Street, 15th Floor Middleton, WI 53562 Sacramento, CA 95814 [email protected] [email protected]
Gayla Stock Cathy Tate Houston-Galveston Area Council US Geological Survey 3555 Timmons Lane, Ste 120 Denver Federal Center Box 25046, MS 415 Houston, TX 77027 Denver, CO 80225 [email protected] [email protected]
Peter Stoks Howard Taylor Association of Rhine Waterworks US Geological Survey p/a Waterwinstation ir. Cornelis Biemond Groenendael 6 3215 Marine St, Ste E-127 Nieuwegein, 3439LV Boulder, CO 80303 [email protected] [email protected]
Wesley Stone Peter Tennant US Geological Survey Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission 5957 Lakeside Blvd. 5735 Kellogg Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46278 Cincinnati, OH 45228 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 582 Jim Tesoriero Patty Toccalino US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive 6000 J Street, Placer Hall Portland, OR 97216 Sacramento, CA 95819 [email protected] [email protected]
Susan Thiros Brooks Tramell US Geological Survey Oklahoma Conservation Commission 2329 Orton Circle 1009 S Muskogee Ave Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Tahlequah, OK 74464 [email protected] [email protected]
David Thomas Dwight Trueblood Ventura County Watershed Protection CICEET 800 S. Victoria Avenue University of New Hampshire Gregg Hall, 35 Colovos Road Ventura, CA 93009 Durham, NH 03824 [email protected] [email protected]
Mary Ann Thomas Dave Tucker US Geological Survey City of San Jose 6480 Doubletree Avenue 170 West San Carlos Street Columbus, OH 43229 San Jose, CA 95113 [email protected] [email protected]
Karen Thomas Dean Tucker US Geological Survey National Park Service 2730 N. Deer Run Road Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Ste 250 Carson City, NV 89701 Fort Collins, CO 80525 [email protected] [email protected]
Olivier Thomas Luisa Valiela Universite de Sherbrooke US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 2500 Boul de l'universite local A6-1021 75 Hawthorne Street Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1 San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] [email protected]
Mike Thompson Beverly Van Buuren Ministry for the Environment San Jose State University Foundation PO Box 10362 Moss Landing Marine Labs 4320 Baker Ave NW Wellington, Seattle, WA 98107 [email protected] [email protected]
Marlene Thompson Pete Van Metre St. Regis Mohawk Tribe US Geological Survey 412 State Route 37 8027 Exchange Drive Akwesasne, NY 13655 Austin, TX 78754 [email protected] [email protected]
Jessica Thompson Anne Van Sweringen US Geological Survey Washington Dept of Ecology 8505 Research Way PO Box 47600 Middleton, WI 53562 Olympia, WA 98504 [email protected] [email protected]
Ty Thompson Tom Vandall Table Mountain Rancheria FTS, Inc. PO Box 410 1065 Henry Eng Place Friant, CA 93626 Victoria, BC V9B 6B2 [email protected] [email protected]
Cecilia Thompson Amara Vandervort St. Regis Mohawk Tribe San Jose State University Foundation 412 State Route 37 Moss Landing Marine Labs 2560 NE 106th Place Akwesasne, NY 13655 Seattle, WA 98125 [email protected] [email protected]
Jos Timmerman Richard Verdi RIZA US Geological Survey PO Box 17 2010 Levy Avenue Lelystad, NL-8200AA Tallahassee, FL 32310 [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 583 Eric Vowinkel Linda Watts National Water Quality Monitoring Council LaMotte Company 119 National Center 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive 802 Washington Avenue Reston, VA 20192 Chestertown, MD 21620 [email protected] [email protected]
Sheila Vukovich Richard Webb West Virginia Dept Environmental Protection US Geological Survey 105 South Railroad Street Box 25046, MS 412, DFC, Bldg 53 Philippi, WV 26416 Denver, CO 80225 [email protected] [email protected]
Ian Waite Rebecca Weidman US Geological Survey NEIWPCC 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive 116 John Street, Boott Mills South Portland, OR 97216 Lowell, MA 01852 [email protected] [email protected]
Abby Waits Tommy Wells US Environmental Proteciotn Agency Weston Solutions 11251 Roger Bacon Drive 2433 Impala Drive Reston, VA 20190 Carlsbad, CA 92008 [email protected] [email protected]
Lisa Walling Dennis Wentz U. C. Berkeley US Geological Survey 1619 Grant Street, #6 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive Berkeley, CA 94703 Portland, OR 97216 [email protected] [email protected]
Michael Walsh Inge Werner Computer Sciences Corporation UC Davis 6101 Stevenson Avenue Aquatic Toxicology Lab VM: APC Alexandria, VA 22304 Davis, CA 95616 [email protected] [email protected]
Robert Ward Peter Westerhuis 1558 Arroyo Drive Schlumberger Water Services Windsor, CO 80550 Waterloo Hydrogeologic, Inc. 460 Phillip Street, Ste 101 [email protected] Waterloo, ON N2l 5j2 [email protected] Janice Ward US Geological Survey David Whitall DFC Box 25046, MS 401 NOAA Lakewood, CO 80225 N/SCI 1, SSMC4, 1305 East West Highway [email protected] Silver Spring, MD 20910 [email protected] Kelly Warner US Geological Survey Nelia White 1201 W. University SFB RWQCB and SFSU Urbana, IL 61801 1515 Clay St., #1400 [email protected] Oakland, CA 94612 [email protected] Joan Warren US Environmental Protection Agency Susan White 8706 Second Avenue NOAA Silver Spring, MD 20910 Estuarine Reserves Division 1305 East-West Highway [email protected] Silver Spring, MD 20910 [email protected] Glenn Warren US Environmental Protection Agency Gail Whiteman 77 W. Jackson Blvd Little Big Horn College Chicago, IL 60604 PO Box 370 [email protected] Crow Agency, MT 59022 [email protected] Dan Watson City of San Jose Susan Whittington 700 Los Esteros Rd. Georgetown Divide RCD/Tracks San Jose, CA 95134 100 Forni Road, Ste A [email protected] Placerville, CA 95667 [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 584 Michael Wieczorek Lawrence Willis US Geological Survey Virginia DEQ-WCRO 8987 Yellowbrick Road 3019 Peters Creek Road Baltimore, MD 21237 Roanoke, VA 24019 [email protected] [email protected]
Robin Wignall Rick Wilson Stauislaus National Forest Surfrider Foundation Summit Ranger District #1 Pinecrest Lake Road PO Box 6010 Pinecrest, CA 95346 San Clements, CA 92674 [email protected] [email protected]
Bill Wilber John Wilson US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive 5957 Lakeside Blvd. Reston, VA 20192 Indianapolis, IN 46278 [email protected] [email protected]
Dave Wilcox Steve Winkler Gold Systems, Inc. St. Johns River Water Management District 3330 S. 700 E, Ste F 4049 Reid Street Salt Lake City, UT 84106 Palatka, FL 32177 [email protected] [email protected]
Franceska Wilde Dan Wise US Geological Survey US Geological Survey MS412 National Center 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive 10615 SE Cherry Blossom Drive Reston, VA 20192 Portland, OR 97216 [email protected] [email protected]
Candie Wilderman Brian Wisehart Dickinson College Hach Environmental Dept of Environmental Studies PO Box 389 Carlisle, PA 17013 Loveland, CO 80539 [email protected] [email protected]
Jim Wilford Lauren Wisniewski Aquatic Informatics, Inc. US Environmental Protection Agency 210-1050 Homer Street 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 4305T Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9 Washington, DC 20460 [email protected] [email protected]
Gene Williams Jason Wolf Snohomish County Surface Water Management Clark County Public Works 3000 Rockefeller Ave., M/S 607 PO Box 9810 Everett, WA 98201 Vancouver, WA 98666 [email protected] [email protected]
Terry Williams David Wolock Cold Springs Rancheria US Geological Survey PO Box 209 4821 Quail Crest Place Tollhouse, CA 93667 Lawrence, KS 66049 [email protected] [email protected]
Tony Williams Michelle Wood The Coalition for Buzzards Bay Central Valley Water Board 620 Belleville Ave 11020 Sun Center Drive, #200 New Bedford, MA 02745 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 [email protected] [email protected]
Tom Williams Molly Wood Utility Systems Science & Software US Geological Survey 2101 E. 4th Street, Ste 130A 224 W. Central Parkway, Ste 1006 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 mark.serres@su [email protected]
Sandy Williamson Mike Woodside US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 1201 Pacific, #600 640 Grassmere Park, Ste 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 Nashville, TN 37211 [email protected] [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 585 Karen Worcester Ron Zelt Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board US Geological Survey 895 Aerovista Place, Ste 101 5231 S 19th Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Lincoln, NE 68512 [email protected] [email protected]
Peter Wright Paula Zevin US Geological Survey US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 1728 Lampman Drive, Ste D 2890 Woodbridge Avenue (MS-220) Billings, MT 59102 Edison, NJ 08837 [email protected] [email protected]
David Wunsch Andy Ziegler New Hampshire Geological Survey US Geological Survey 29 Hazen Drive 4821 Quail Crest Place Concord, NH 03301 Lawrence, KS 66049 [email protected] [email protected]
Randal Yates John Zogorski State Water Rresources Control Board US Geological Survey 1001 I Street 1608 Mountain View Road Sacramento, CA 95814 Rapid City, SD 57702 [email protected] [email protected]
Chris Yoder Midwest Biodiversity Institute PO Box 21561 Columbus, OH 43221 [email protected]
Dwane Young US Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, MC-4503T Washington, DC 20460 [email protected]
Laura Young Santa Clara Valley Water District 5750 Almaden Expressway, HQ 3 San Jose, CA 95118 [email protected]
Jennifer Young Green Chemistry Institute 1155 Sixteenth St., NW Washington, DC 20009 [email protected]
Tamin Younos Virginia Water Resources Research Center Virginia Tech 23 Agnew Hall (0444) Blacksburg, VA 24061 [email protected]
Shirley Yuan US Geological Survey 2630 Fanta Reed Road LaCrosse, WI 54603 [email protected]
Michael Yurewicz US Geological Survey USGS National Center, MS 433 Reston, VA 20192 [email protected]
Debra Zarnt The Montana Watercourse Montana State University PO Box 170575 Bozeman, MT 59717 [email protected]
2006 National Monitoring Conference-San Jose, CA-CONFERENCE ATTENDEES 586
Thank You! To our generous Conference Sponsors who have made the 2006 National Monitoring Conference a success
Conference Co-Sponsors USGS science for a changing world
Leading Sponsors
2006 Monitoring Conference