DOCSLIB.ORG

OSIRIS-Rex MISSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OSIRIS-Rex MISSION INTEGRATED MODEL-BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (MBSE) APPLIED TO THE SIMULATION OF THE OSIRIS-REx MISSION Phathom Athena Donald Systems Engineer © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OSIRIS-REx MISSION OVERVIEW Origins Spectral Interpretation Resource Identification and Security-Regolith Explorer Overview Challenges (OSIRIS-REx) Objectives • Visit near-Earth asteroid called Bennu and return with Approach samples that may contain clues to the origins of the solar Modeling system and possibly life itself. Simulating • Determine Bennu’s physical and chemical properties. Results • Globally map the topography and mineralogy of Bennu. Reflections • Measure the orbit deviation caused by non-gravitational Future Work forces. • Compare observations made at asteroid to ground-based observations. © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2 OSIRIS-REx MISSION OPERATIONS CHALLENGES Overview Challenges Objectives Approach Modeling Simulating Results Reflections Future Work • Need to avoid sun in the Thermal KOZ and in the +Z area of the spacecraft. • Thermal constraints assert sun cannot be in Thermal KOZ past a certain duration threshold. © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 3 OBJECTIVES Previous Operations Process • Use of GNC prediction software that provides review of Overview constraint violations. Challenges • Objectives Run through SoftSim testbed. Approach • Cannot easily identify spacecraft constraint violations until Modeling mid-development. Simulating New Operations Process Objectives Results • Rapidly evaluate various trajectories for thermal constraint Reflections violations to identify preferred mission trajectory. Future Work • Provide quicker, more flexible approach for assessing geometry constraints during early stages of mission planning. • Efficiently track variables during proposed OSIRIS-REx trajectories. © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 4 APPROACH SysML Model + MBSE Analyzer Systems Tool Kit (STK) Simulation Overview Settings & Challenges Constraints Objectives Approach Modeling Simulating Simulation Settings & Constraints Results ModelCenter Data Explorer Reflections STK & MC Future Work Simulation Results © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 5 OSIRIS-REx SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE MODEL The system architecture model captures: Overview Challenges Objectives Simulation Settings Approach & Constraints Modeling Simulating Structure Results Reflections Future Work Parametrics Simulation Sequence © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 6 MBSEPAK (MBSE ANALYZER) Overview Challenges Objectives Approach Modeling Simulating Results Reflections Future Work • The constraint block in the architecture model points to ModelCenter workflows using MBSE Analyzer. • MBSE Analyzer within MBSE Pak solves the parametric diagram by linking it to the model in ModelCenter that consists of scripts and the STK component. © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 7 SYSTEMS TOOL KIT (STK) • To express the Sun vector’s azimuth and elevation in reference to the Body Axes, the vector is projected onto the Body XY plane, Overview creating the red “SunOnXY” vector. Challenges • The angle between SunOnXY and Body X is the “SolarAzimuth”. Objectives The angle between SunOnXY and Body Z is the “SolarElevation”. Approach Modeling Simulating Results Reflections Future Work © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 8 MODELCENTER WORKFLOWS Overview Challenges Objectives Approach Modeling Simulating Results Reflections Future Work • The scenario results are linked to scripts defined in ModelCenter for determining any constraint violations. © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 9 SIMULATION PROCESS OVERVIEW 1. Enter simulation settings 2. Initiate simulation from 6. Evaluate STK parameters; and constraints. MBSE Analyzer. return results to MBSE Analyzer. Overview Challenges 7. Display simulation results for Objectives each time step. Approach Modeling Simulating Results Reflections Future Work 5. Retrieve parameter 4. Point to external 3. Step through the mission values from STK. analysis tools. simulation. © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 10 SIMULATION RESULTS & REQUIREMENTS VERIFICATION Overview Challenges Objectives Approach Modeling Simulating Results Reflections Future Work • System-level and subsystem-level states captured in value properties. • Requirements verification captured in value properties. • Values stored at each time step and displayed in Data Explorer. © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 11 REFLECTIONS MBSE Advantages Challenges Encountered • Could not express time in Overview • Formal, accurate system- level model capture. UTCG without STK Object Challenges • Early identification of Model. (resolved in STK11) Objectives requirements issues. • No requirements Approach • Early, and on-going verification at each time Modeling requirements and design step. Simulating verification. • Dot notation not allowed on Results • Improved impact analysis of parametric diagrams. Reflections requirements changes. Lessons Learned Future Work • Interconnectivity and reuse • The STK Programming of existing models to Interface allows for great support system design. flexibility. • Rapid re-evaluation when • Collaborating with vendor design changes occur. tech support is imperative. © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 12 FUTURE WORK • Extend the system-level model Overview • Include downlink duration and momentum buildup Challenges • Extend and refine the behavioral and analysis models Objectives • Improve approach for plot generation Approach Modeling Simulating Results Reflections Future Work • Enable sensitivity analysis and design optimization • Implement analysis integration for NASA’s Lucy mission © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 13 Architecture Model SIMULATION SETTINGS & THERMAL CONSTRAINTS • Simulation time Overview settings and system Challenges thermal constraints are captured in the system Objectives model. Approach • This facilitates Modeling requirement and Simulating constraint changes for Results efficient impact Reflections analysis. Future Work © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 15 Architecture Model STRUCTURAL DIAGRAMS Overview Challenges Mission Level Objectives Approach Modeling Simulating Results Reflections Future Work Vehicle Level © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 16 Architecture Model PARAMETRIC DIAGRAM • Using MBSE Pak, value properties are bound to a constraint block that links to Overview a model in ModelCenter that contains scripts and a STK Challenges component. Objectives • Inputs to STK: • Analysis Start Time Approach • Analysis Stop Time Modeling • Time Step Size • Outputs from STK Simulating • Solar Elevation Results • Solar Azimuth • Solar Range Reflections • Earth Range Future Work • Bennu Range • SAP Angle • SPE Angle • Outputs from ModelCenter • KOZ in Sun • Duration of thermal violations © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 17 Architecture Model MAIN SIMULATION LOOP Update states Overview and value properties Challenges Objectives Approach Modeling Simulating Results Reflections Loop Simulation from Analysis Future Work Start Time to Update time Analysis Stop Time © 2018 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 18.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planetary Science Division Status Report
    Planetary Science Division Status Report Jim Green NASA, Planetary Science Division January 26, 2017 Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory CommiBee Outline • Planetary Science ObjecFves • Missions and Events Overview • Flight Programs: – Discovery – New FronFers – Mars Programs – Outer Planets • Planetary Defense AcFviFes • R&A Overview • Educaon and Outreach AcFviFes • PSD Budget Overview New Horizons exploresPlanetary Science Pluto and the Kuiper Belt Ascertain the content, origin, and evoluFon of the Solar System and the potenFal for life elsewhere! 01/08/2016 As the highest resolution images continue to beam back from New Horizons, the mission is onto exploring Kuiper Belt Objects with the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) camera from unique viewing angles not visible from Earth. New Horizons is also beginning maneuvers to be able to swing close by a Kuiper Belt Object in the next year. Giant IcebergsObjecve 1.5.1 (water blocks) floatingObjecve 1.5.2 in glaciers of Objecve 1.5.3 Objecve 1.5.4 Objecve 1.5.5 hydrogen, mDemonstrate ethane, and other frozenDemonstrate progress gasses on the Demonstrate Sublimation pitsDemonstrate from the surface ofDemonstrate progress Pluto, potentially surface of Pluto.progress in in exploring and progress in showing a geologicallyprogress in improving active surface.in idenFfying and advancing the observing the objects exploring and understanding of the characterizing objects The Newunderstanding of Horizons missionin the Solar System to and the finding locaons origin and evoluFon in the Solar System explorationhow the chemical of Pluto wereunderstand how they voted the where life could of life on Earth to that pose threats to and physical formed and evolve have existed or guide the search for Earth or offer People’sprocesses in the Choice for Breakthrough of thecould exist today life elsewhere resources for human Year forSolar System 2015 by Science Magazine as exploraon operate, interact well as theand evolve top story of 2015 by Discover Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbit Determination
    Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) Flight Dynamics Commissioning Results and Experiences ( . - -~ . ' : .•. ' Joel J. K. Parker NASA Goddard Space Flight Center ', ~Qi Ryan L. Lebois L3 Applied Defense Solutions .•.-· e, • i Stephen Lutz L3 Applied Defense Solutions ,/,#· Craig Nickel L3 Applied Defense Solutions Kevin Ferrant Omitron, Inc. Adam Michaels Omitron, Inc. August 22, 2018 Contents Mission Overview Flight Dynamics Ground System TESS Commissioning . Launch . Phasing Loops & Maneuver Execution . PAM & Extended Mission Design . Commissioning Results Orbit Determination Conclusions 2 Mission Overview—Science Goals Primary Goal: Discover Transiting Earths and Super-Earths Orbiting Bright, Nearby Stars . Rocky planets & water worlds . Habitable planets Discover the “Best” ~1000 Small Exoplanets . “Best” means “readily characterizable” • Bright Host Stars • Measurable Mass & Atmospheric Properties Unique lunar-resonant mission orbit provides long view periods without station-keeping 27 days 54 days Large-Area Survey of Bright Stars . F, G, K dwarfs: +4 to +12 magnitude . M dwarfs known within ~60 parsecs . “All sky” observations in 2 years . All stars observed >20 days . Ecliptic poles observed ~1 year (JWST Continuous Viewing Zone) 3 s Mission Overview—Spacecraft LENS HOOD THERMAL . LENSES BLANKETS SUN SHADE REACTION WHEELS DETECTORS ELECTRONICS SOLAR ARRAYS MASTER ANTENNA COMPUTER PROPULSION TANK STRUCTURE Northrop Grumman LEOStar-2/750 bus Attitude Control: Propulsion:
    [Show full text]
  • ATHENA COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER #4 December 2017 Contents
    ATHENA COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER #4 December 2017 Contents Welcome.......................................................................................... 1 Fourth Announcement of Opportunity to join the Athena Community Working Groups/Topical Panels .................................................... 1 Discovery of Electromagnetic Counterparts to Gravitational Waves .......... 2 Athena Project Status .......................................................................... 2 News from the Instruments ................................................................. 4 News from the WFI ......................................................................... 4 News from X-IFU ............................................................................ 4 The SKA-Athena Synergy Exercise Coming to the End.............................. 6 Athena End-to-End Simulations ............................................................ 7 Unveiling the Hot, High Redshift Universe with the Athena WFI ................. 8 Athena Community People .................................................................. 9 Conferences ................................................................................... 10 Athena in Conferences (January-July 2018) ....................................... 10 Coming conferences of interest ...................................................... 10 Edited by Athena Community Office: F.J. Carrera, M.T. Ceballos, S. Martínez-Núñez, M.P. Monterde Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC) Avda Los Castros s/n 39005 Santander
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy News KW RASC FRIDAY JANUARY 8 2021
    Astronomy News KW RASC FRIDAY JANUARY 8 2021 JIM FAIRLES What to expect for spaceflight and astronomy in 2021 https://astronomy.com/news/2021/01/what-to-expect-for- spaceflight-and-astronomy-in-2021 By Corey S. Powell | Published: Monday, January 4, 2021 Whatever craziness may be happening on Earth, the coming year promises to be a spectacular one across the solar system. 2020 - It was the worst of times, it was the best of times. First landing on the lunar farside, two impressive successes in gathering samples from asteroids, the first new pieces of the Moon brought home in 44 years, close-up explorations of the Sun, and major advances in low-cost reusable rockets. First Visit to Jupiter's Trojan Asteroids First Visit to Jupiter's Trojan Asteroids In October, NASA is set to launch the Lucy spacecraft. Over its 12-year primary mission, Lucy will visit eight different asteroids. One target lies in the asteroid belt. The other seven are so-called Trojan asteroids that share an orbit with Jupiter, trapped in points of stability 60 degrees ahead of or behind the planet as it goes around the sun. These objects have been trapped in their locations for billions of years, probably since the time of the formation of the solar system. They contain preserved samples of water-rich and carbon-rich material in the outer solar system; some of that material formed Jupiter, while other bits moved inward to contribute to Earth's life-sustaining composition. As a whimsical aside: When meteorites strike carbon-rich asteroids, they create tiny carbon crystals.
    [Show full text]
  • Members' Meeting Package
    DPS Members Meeting 6 October 2011 Members Meeting Agenda Opening remarks Melissa McGrath Secretary’s report Athena Coustenis Treasurer’s report Diana Blaney EPO report Nick Schneider Webmaster report Tony Roman Hartmann Travel Grant recipients Dan Britt Professional Development Subcommittee report Rachel Mastrapa Federal Relations Subcommittee report Josh Emery Survey report Anne Verbiscer Icarus report Phil Nicholson Nominating Subcommittee member election Nantes Meeting report Olivier Grasset Future meetings report Melissa McGrath Press Officer report Vishnu Reddy Outgoing Chair remarks Melissa McGrath Incoming chair remarks Dan Britt New Business, discussion, questions Opening Remarks • Short reports, please hold questions until the end. Longer versions are posted on the DPS web site at: dps.aas.org/reports • Later in the meeting we’ll elect a new member of the Nominating Subcommittee. From our By Laws: "The Nominating Subcommittee is responsible for presenting to the DPS Secretary a list of candidates for DPS Officers and Committee members. At the business meeting each year, the DPS membership selects a new member for the Nominating Subcommittee, who serves a three-year term. In the third year of service, the member serves as Chair of the subcommittee." DPS Secretary’s Report Athena Coustenis Membership • Current active membership: 1358, same as last year at the same time (varying between 1100 and 1500). Non-US fraction 19% • Renew your membership and pay your dues TODAY and in any event before 31 December 2011 to avoid dropping from lists in Feb. – Pay your 2012 membership dues online at https://members.aas.org/ • Also, please take a moment to update your personal DPS member file.
    [Show full text]
  • LINDA TARBOX ELKINS-TANTON Curriculum Vitae August 2020
    LINDA TARBOX ELKINS-TANTON Curriculum Vitae August 2020 Managing Director, Interplanetary Initiative, Arizona State University Principal Investigator, NASA Psyche mission Co-founder, Beagle Learning Office: (480) 727-2451 | Mobile: (617) 784-3817 | [email protected] RESEARCH Terrestrial planetary formation and subsequent planetary evolution. Creation of effective interdisciplinary teams and their leadership for maximizing discovery. Inquiry and exploration learning and the reformation of education for the Information Age. My mission is to create a generation of problem-solvers. Research Achievements • The evolution of planetesimals includes partially differentiated and other complex compositional structures, explaining physical and compositional observations from meteorites and asteroids. • The Siberian flood basalts erupted most of their volume before the end-Permian extinction occurred; the magmatism released carbon, sulfur, and halocarbons sufficient to drive catastrophic global climate change; the flood basalts began with a world-record volume of volcaniclastics, many erupted as tuffs and burning a significant coal volume. • Magma ocean stages of terrestrial planet formation retained sufficient water to create habitable planets without additional water delivery (though that is inevitable as well), and the silicate differentiation produced by magma ocean solidification creates successful predictions about current- day Moon, Earth, Mercury, and Mars. • Drip magmatism: Lithospheric gravitational instabilities heat, melt, and produce magmatism while they sinK into the mantle; verified in Chile, in Tibet, in the Sierra Nevada, and in east Africa. • The productivity of questions can be rated using a rubric and scored successfully by artificial intelligence. EDUCATION PhD, Geology and Geophysics, MIT, 2002. Advisors: Timothy L. Grove and Bradford H. Hager. MS, Geochemistry, MIT, 1987. Advisor: Timothy L.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraformational Sediment Recycling on Mars Kenneth S
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Extraformational sediment recycling on Mars Kenneth S. Edgett1, Steven G. Banham2, Kristen A. Bennett3, Lauren A. Edgar3, Christopher S. Edwards4, Alberto G. Fairén5,6, Christopher M. Fedo7, Deirdra M. Fey1, James B. Garvin8, John P. Grotzinger9, Sanjeev Gupta2, Marie J. Henderson10, Christopher H. House11, Nicolas Mangold12, GEOSPHERE, v. 16, no. 6 Scott M. McLennan13, Horton E. Newsom14, Scott K. Rowland15, Kirsten L. Siebach16, Lucy Thompson17, Scott J. VanBommel18, Roger C. Wiens19, 20 20 https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02244.1 Rebecca M.E. Williams , and R. Aileen Yingst 1Malin Space Science Systems, P.O. Box 910148, San Diego, California 92191-0148, USA 2Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK 19 figures; 1 set of supplemental files 3U.S. Geological Survey, Astrogeology Science Center, 2255 N. Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA 4Department of Astronomy and Planetary Science, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 6010, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] 5Department of Planetology and Habitability, Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), M-108, km 4, 28850 Madrid, Spain 6Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA 7 CITATION: Edgett, K.S., Banham, S.G., Bennett, K.A., Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The University of Tennessee, 1621 Cumberland Avenue, 602 Strong Hall, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1410, USA 8 Edgar, L.A., Edwards, C.S., Fairén, A.G., Fedo, C.M., National Aeronautics
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Sg423finalreport.Pdf
    Notice: The cosmic study or position paper that is the subject of this report was approved by the Board of Trustees of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring or funding organizations. For more information about the International Academy of Astronautics, visit the IAA home page at www.iaaweb.org. Copyright 2019 by the International Academy of Astronautics. All rights reserved. The International Academy of Astronautics (IAA), an independent nongovernmental organization recognized by the United Nations, was founded in 1960. The purposes of the IAA are to foster the development of astronautics for peaceful purposes, to recognize individuals who have distinguished themselves in areas related to astronautics, and to provide a program through which the membership can contribute to international endeavours and cooperation in the advancement of aerospace activities. © International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) May 2019. This publication is protected by copyright. The information it contains cannot be reproduced without written authorization. Title: A Handbook for Post-Mission Disposal of Satellites Less Than 100 kg Editors: Darren McKnight and Rei Kawashima International Academy of Astronautics 6 rue Galilée, Po Box 1268-16, 75766 Paris Cedex 16, France www.iaaweb.org ISBN/EAN IAA : 978-2-917761-68-7 Cover Illustration: credit A Handbook for Post-Mission Disposal of Satellites
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2021 Mission Fact Sheets
    FY 2021 Budget Request Deep Space Exploration Systems ($ Millions) FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Deep Space Exploration Systems 5,044.8 6,017.6 8,761.7 10,299.7 11,605.1 10,887.7 8,962.2 Exploration Systems Development 4,086.8 3,713.9 4,042.3 4,011.2 4,071.7 3,767.7 3,634.8 Orion Program 1,350.0 981.0 1,400.5 1,322.3 1,391.0 1,239.9 1,084.7 Space Launch System 2,144.0 2,203.3 2,257.1 2,238.3 2,249.2 2,091.8 2,087.1 Exploration Ground Systems 592.8 529.6 384.7 450.6 431.6 436.0 463.0 Exploration Research & Development 958.0 2,303.7 4,719.4 6,288.5 7,533.4 7,120.0 5,327.4 Advanced Exploration Systems 348.9 255.6 258.2 226.9 146.7 130.1 130.1 Adv Cislunar and Surface Capabilities 132.1 1,294.2 212.1 821.4 1,664.5 1,502.1 1,152.6 Gateway 332.0 613.9 739.3 712.1 481.8 376.5 476.4 Human Research Program 145.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 Human Landing System 0.0 0.0 3,369.8 4,388.1 5,100.4 4,971.3 3,428.3 Grand Total 5,044.8 6,017.6 8,761.7 10,299.7 11,605.1 10,887.7 8,962.2 The FY 2021 Budget for the Deep Space Exploration Systems account consists of two areas, Exploration Systems Development (ESD) and Exploration Research and Development (ERD), which provide for the development of systems and capabilities needed for human exploration of the Moon and Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • SMSC March 2021 Newsletter
    SMSC March 2021 Newsletter News This Month OSIRIS-REx seeks answers to the questions that are central to the ​ human experience: Where did we come from? What is our destiny? Asteroids, the leftover debris from the solar system formation process, can answer these questions and teach us about the history of the sun and planets. OSIRIS-REx is scheduled to depart Bennu on May 10 and begin its two-year journey back to Earth. The spacecraft will deliver ​ ​ the samples of Bennu to the Utah Test and Training Range on Sep. 24, 2023. Credit: NASA/Goddard/University of Arizona March skies feature many dazzling stars and ​ constellations but two of the brightest stars are the focus of our attention this month: Sirius and Procyon, ​ ​ the dog stars! Discover more about these two nearby star systems in this month's edition of Night Sky Notes! ​ ​ We have a slack channel - if you would like to be added to the channel to discuss ways to use NASA resources locally, or if you have questions about how we can help you meet your goals, please send an email to [email protected] or you can follow us on ​ Facebook or Twitter. ​ ​ ​ NASA NEWS Lucy Mission in Space Contest - deadline March 16, 2021 ​ ● Middle school students will design a “mission patch” showing how the process of evolution on Earth may parallel the evolution of the solar system and explain the patch design with a poem or short essay. ● High school students will create a message to any future finders of the Lucy spacecraft, which will likely orbit the sun for more than one million years and could be recovered by our descendants in the distant future.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM WET PLANET to RED PLANET Current and Future Exploration Is Shaping Our Understanding of How the Climate of Mars Changed
    FROM WET PLANET TO RED PLANET Current and future exploration is shaping our understanding of how the climate of Mars changed. Joel Davis deciphers the planet’s ancient, drying climate 14 DECEMBER 2020 | WWW.GEOLSOC.ORG.UK/GEOSCIENTIST WWW.GEOLSOC.ORG.UK/GEOSCIENTIST | DECEMBER 2020 | 15 FEATURE GEOSCIENTIST t has been an exciting year for Mars exploration. 2020 saw three spacecraft launches to the Red Planet, each by diff erent space agencies—NASA, the Chinese INational Space Administration, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Space Agency. NASA’s latest rover, Perseverance, is the fi rst step in a decade-long campaign for the eventual return of samples from Mars, which has the potential to truly transform our understanding of the still scientifi cally elusive Red Planet. On this side of the Atlantic, UK, European and Russian scientists are also getting ready for the launch of the European Space Agency (ESA) and Roscosmos Rosalind Franklin rover mission in 2022. The last 20 years have been a golden era for Mars exploration, with ever increasing amounts of data being returned from a variety of landed and orbital spacecraft. Such data help planetary geologists like me to unravel the complicated yet fascinating history of our celestial neighbour. As planetary geologists, we can apply our understanding of Earth to decipher the geological history of Mars, which is key to guiding future exploration. But why is planetary exploration so focused on Mars in particular? Until recently, the mantra of Mars exploration has been to follow the water, which has played an important role in shaping the surface of Mars.
    [Show full text]