EN CIPR Project Presentation2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EN CIPR Project Presentation2 6-8 June CIPR Innopolis 2018 1 CONFERENCE КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ CIPR-2017 CIPR-2018 BACKGROUND ЦИПР-2017 ЦИПР-2018 24-26 May 2017 the second CIPR Confer- In June 2018 the annual Conference CIPR PROGRAM “DIGITAL ECONOMY” ence and RIF was held in Innopolis. 2018 will take place in Innopolis. 24-26 мая 2017 года в городе Иннополис состоялась В июне 2018 года в г. Иннополис состоится ежегодная Program “Digital Economy” was approved by the Russian Gov- КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ вторая конференция Цифровая индустрия CIPRконференция . Цифровая Индустрия Промышленной России 2018. ernment in its resosution № 1632-r on July 28 2017 and was in- промышленной России (ЦИПР) и РИФ. Министр связи ЦИПР — актуальная межотраслевая площадка для глобального cluded in the list of the main directions of Russia strategic devel- Minister of Communications of the Russian Federation CIPR - is an actual inter-sectoral platform for a global di- и массовых коммуникаций РФ Николай Никифоров диалога представителей промышленности, профессионалов opment until 2025 Nikolay Nikiforov presented the Roadmap for the de- alogue between industry representatives, IT profession- представил Дорожную карту по развитию в России отрасли информационных технологий, телекома, оборонного velopment of the digital economy in Russia It was dis- als, telecoms, military industrial complex, venture investors цифровой экономики. Она обсуждалась не только комплекса, венчурных инвесторов и государства по вопросам cussed not only at the key events, but also in working and the state concerning such questions as development на основных мероприятиях, но и в рабочих группах развития цифровой экономики, не сырьевого экспорта groups where market experts also took part. of the digital economy, non-commodity export and cyber- с участием экспертов рынка. и обеспечения кибербезопасности. MARKET REQUEST ЦИПР-2017 ЦИПР-2018 security. Market participants need a unique communication platform for ПРЕДПОСЫЛКИ discussion of current events in field of digital economy ПРОГРАММА ПО «ЦИФРОВОЙ ЭКОНОМИКЕ» 24-26 мая 2017 года в городе Иннополис состоялась В июне 2018 года в г. Иннополис состоится ежегодная вторая конференция Цифровая индустрия конференция Цифровая Индустрия Промышленной России 2018. • Цифровая экономика внесена в перечень основных промышленной России (ЦИПР) и РИФ. Министр связи ЦИПР — актуальная межотраслевая площадка для глобального направлений стратегического развития России до 2025 года. и массовых коммуникаций РФ Николай Никифоров диалога представителей промышленности, профессионалов • Программа «Цифровая экономика» была утверждена распо- представил Дорожную карту по развитию в России отрасли информационных технологий, телекома, оборонного цифровой экономики. Она обсуждалась не только комплекса, венчурных инвесторов и государства по вопросам ряжением Правительства РФ №1632-р от 28 июля 2017 года. на основных мероприятиях, но и в рабочих группах развития цифровой экономики, не сырьевого экспорта • Программа по “Цифровой экономике” является важным с участием экспертов рынка. и обеспечения кибербезопасности. политическим и экономическим инструментом для развития страны и бизнеса. ПРЕДПОСЫЛКИ ПРОГРАММА ПО «ЦИФРОВОЙ ЭКОНОМИКЕ» ЗАПРОС ОТ РЫНКА • Цифровая экономика внесена в перечень основных направлений стратегического развития России до 2025 года. Активные и перспективные участники рынка не вошедшие в состав АНО нуждаются в проверенной и актуальной • Программа «Цифровая экономика» была утверждена распо- ряжением Правительства РФ №1632-р от 28 июля 2017 года. информации, а также обрат ной связи по максимально эффективной интеграции • Программа по “Цифровой экономике” является важным политическим и экономическим инструментом для развития страны и бизнеса. 2 ЗАПРОС ОТ РЫНКА Активные и перспективные участники рынка не вошедшие в состав АНО нуждаются в проверенной и актуальной информации, а также обрат ной связи по максимально эффективной интеграции CIPR EVOLUTION CIPR 2016 CIPR 2017 CIPR 2018 3 300 270 5 126 204 6 500 200 guests speakers guests speakers guests speakers 650 1 500 1 500 2 603 2 000 5 000 m2 exhibition publications m2 exhibition publications m2 exhibition publications 4 46 46 3 28 46 3 30 65 days Panel Companies- days Panel Companies- days Panel Companies- discussions partners discussions partners discussions partners 18 1 500 20 7 500 20 10 000 Info- Online Info- Online Info- Online partners translations partners translations partners translations 3 Communication EDUCATIONAL AND platform SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTIONS CIPR 2018 INVESTMENT AND VENTURE FUNDS MASS MEDIA STATE COPPORATIONS FEDERAL AUTHORITIES STARTUP COMMUNITY REGIONAL AUTHORITIES IT MARKET 4 CONFERENCE STRUCTURE EEU FORUM BUSINESS PROGRAM EXHIBITION EEU Ministers meeting- the main Panel discussions, round tables, closed meet- Exposition of partner companies and interactive demon- directions of the digital agenda of ings, meeting of The Sub-commission for digi- stration of IT products and technologies the Union tal economy of the governmental commission for the use of information technologies SPECIAL PROJECTS EDUCATION Partnership projects, project rally, CIPR-2018 Public lectures, discussions, interactive partnership projects, online broadcast of lectures on the export forum Internet, competions ENTERTAINMENT STARTUP CONTEST INFRASTRUCTURE Evening and informal events for Activities to identify and support promising Nutrition, transport, resettlement, lounge zones, different audiences, VIP events projects business contacts exchange 5 BUSINESS PROGRAM ROLE OF THE STATE AND BUSINESS IN THE FORMATION OF DIGITAL ECONOMY OF RUSSIA SMART CITY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION HEALTH CARE INVESTMENT CLIMATE PERSONEL AND NORMATIVE FORMATION OF RESEARCH COMPETENCIES AND INFORMATION INFORMATION EDUCATION REGULATION TECHNOLOGICAL TRENDS SECURITY INFRASTRUCTURE NEUROTECHNOLOGIES AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLECT NEW PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) BIG DATA ROBOTICS AND SENSORICS QUANTUM COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGIES OF VIRTUAL AND ADDITIONAL REALITIES BLOCKCHAIN CONVERSION IN RUSSIAN MILLITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX DIGITAL ECONOMY WORLD EXPERIENCE INDUSTRY BUSINESS SESSIONS TRANSPORT BUILDING ENERGY AGRICULTURE E-COMMERCE FINTECH EXPORT OF CYBERSPORT RUSSIAN IT SOLUTIONS 6 NEW PRODUCTION Technological TECHNOLOGIES trends BIG DATA Project QUANTUM COMMUNICATION rally Opinion TECHNOLOGIES leaders TECHNOLOGIES OF VIRTUAL AND ADDITIONAL REALITIES Startup projects NEUROTECHNOLOGIES AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLECT Discussion of the top DE INTERNET OF THINGS (IoT) projects ROBOTICS AND SENSORICS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Interactive BLOCKCHAIN demonstration 7 ATTRACTION OF EEU COUNTRIES RATIFICATIONS BUSINESS MEETING OF THE EEU MINISTERS AND AGREEMENTS PARTICIPATION OF EEU COUNTRIES IN EXHIBITION AND DEMONSTRATION OF DIGITAL ECONOMY PROJECTS DISCUSSION OF THE MAIN DIRECTIONS OF THE DIGITAL AGENDA OF THE UNION ATTRACTING DELEGATION FROM UNION COUNTRIES CONCLUSION OF AGREEMENTS ON PARTNERSHIPS AND ENHANCING ECONOMIC GROWTH OF STATES DEMONSTRATION OF PERSPECTIVE PROJECTS SPECIAL EXHIBITION PROJECTS Interactive projects Partnership projects, export forum 8 PARTNER PROGRAMS WITH UNIVERSITIES In accordance with the program “Digital Economy”, it is planned that the country’s universities will produce more than 120,000 IT professionals per year SO IT IS PROPOSED TO MAKE PARTNER- SHIP PROGRAMS WITH THE FOLLOWING FORMATS UNIVERSITIES Institute of Statistical Studies and Economics of LECTURE PRACTICIAL (ASSIGNMENT ON DIRECTIONS ) Knowledge (HSEI) HSE ITMO Lectures / master classes in uni- 1. PERSONEL AND 2. NORMATIVE 3. INFORMATION I 4. INFORMATION versities EDUCATION REGULATION NFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY Kazan Federal University Teleconferences 5. FORMATION OF RESEARCH COMPETENCIES AND TECHNOLOGICAL GROUNDWORK Moscow State Technical University named after CIPR Educational program N.E. Bauman (National Research University) CIPR ORGANIZATIONAL FUNCTIONS : PRIZE St. Petersburg Polytechnic University of Peter the INTERNSHIP IN THE Great Moderation COMPANIES INCLUDED IN THE EXPERT WORKING GROUPS Placement of subtotals University of Innopolis Definition of TOP 3 participants in directions Organization and holding of the final competition within the framework of the Conference and identification of the winner in each direction 9 WEEKLY DIGEST «CIPR» the weekly specialized magazine CIPR, which presents key news about the DIGEST development of the digital economy and information technology. THE MAIN CONTENT OF THE DIGEST: TOP 10 PUBLICATIONS OF RUSSIAN RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN AGENDA: NEWS OF COM- THE COLUMN “EXPERT OPINION” AND FOREIGN MEDIA IN A WEEK PANIES, ON NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND RESULTS Key Speakers Interview (Media Monitoring) WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF Top 5 Russian Exclusive materials from the CIPR editorial : expert com- Top 5 foreign Digital Healthcare ments, interviews Personnel and Education POSSIBILITY OF DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE RUSSIAN AGENDA - NEWS ABOUT THE Technological trends: neurotechnologies and artificial in- tellect, internet of things, robotics and sensorics, wireless EXPERTS AND READERS. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM communication technology, blockchain, new production «DIGITAL ECONOMY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION» technologies, technologies of virtual and additional Poster of the most significant and interesting events in the realities field of digital economy, invitations to CIPR partner con- Authorities participating in the implementation of the ferences program Information Security Business: ANCO DE, Competence Centers, Working Groups
Recommended publications
  • The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies
    The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies Edited by Daria Gritsenko Mariëlle Wijermars · Mikhail Kopotev The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies Daria Gritsenko Mariëlle Wijermars • Mikhail Kopotev Editors The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies Editors Daria Gritsenko Mariëlle Wijermars University of Helsinki Maastricht University Helsinki, Finland Maastricht, The Netherlands Mikhail Kopotev Higher School of Economics (HSE University) Saint Petersburg, Russia ISBN 978-3-030-42854-9 ISBN 978-3-030-42855-6 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42855-6 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 BRICS Ufa Summit Compliance Report 10 July 2015 to 19 September 2016
    2015 BRICS Ufa Summit Compliance Report 10 July 2015 to 19 September 2016 Prepared by: Mark Rakhmangulov, Andrey Shelepov, Andrei Sakharov and the Center for International Institutions Research of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow and Caroline Bracht, Alissa Wang and the University of Toronto BRICS Research Group Toronto 12 October 2016 2015 BRICS Ufa Compliance Report Contents Research Team .................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction and Summary ............................................................................................................... 4 Methodology and Scoring System ................................................................................................. 4 The Breakdown of Commitments ................................................................................................. 5 Table 1: Distribution of BRICS Commitments across Issue Areas, 2009-2015 ......................... 6 Selection of Commitments ............................................................................................................ 6 Table 2: 2015 BRICS Ufa Summit Priority Commitments ...................................................... 7 Compliance Scores ........................................................................................................................ 7 Table 3: 2015 BRICS Ufa Summit Compliance Scores ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Cultural Framework of Internet Governance: Russia’S Great Power Identity and the Quest for a Multipolar Digital Order
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Center for Advanced Research in Global CARGC Papers Communication (CARGC) 4-2020 Toward a Cultural Framework of Internet Governance: Russia’s Great Power Identity and the Quest for a Multipolar Digital Order Stanislav Budnitsky University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cargc_papers Part of the Communication Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Budnitsky, Stanislav, "Toward a Cultural Framework of Internet Governance: Russia’s Great Power Identity and the Quest for a Multipolar Digital Order" (2020). CARGC Papers. 13. https://repository.upenn.edu/cargc_papers/13 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/cargc_papers/13 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Toward a Cultural Framework of Internet Governance: Russia’s Great Power Identity and the Quest for a Multipolar Digital Order Description CARGC Paper 13, “Toward a Cultural Framework of Internet Governance: Russia’s Great Power Identity and the Quest for a Multipolar Digital Order,” by CARGC Postdoctoral Fellow Stanislav Budnitsky was initially delivered as a CARGC Colloquium in 2018. As part of Budnitsky’s larger research project on the relationship between nationalism and global internet governance, CARGC Paper 13 considers the cultural logics underlying Russia’s global internet governance agenda. It argues that to understand Russia’s digital vision in the early twenty-first century and, by extension, the dynamics of global internet politics writ large, scholars must incorporate Russia’s historic self-identification as a great power into their analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 BRICS Xiamen Summit Compliance Report
    2017 BRICS Xiamen Summit Final Compliance Report 6 September 2017 to 5 July 2018 Prepared by Alissa Xinhe Wang, Angela Minyi Hou, Brittaney Warren and the University oF Toronto BRICS Research Group and Irina Popova, Andey Shelepov, Andrei Sakharov and Alexander Ignatov and the Center For International Institutions Research oF the Russian Presidential Academy oF National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow 23 July 2018 2017 BRICS Xiamen Summit Final Compliance Report Contents Research Team .................................................................................................................................................... 3 University of Toronto Research Team ....................................................................................................... 3 Country Specialists .................................................................................................................................... 3 Compliance Analysts ................................................................................................................................ 3 RANEPA Research Team ............................................................................................................................ 3 Compliance Analysts ................................................................................................................................ 3 Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in (Insert Country Name Here)
    Doing Business in Russia: 2013 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2010. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. • Chapter 1: Doing Business in Russia • Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment • Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services • Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment • Chapter 5: Trade Regulations, Customs and Standards • Chapter 6: Investment Climate • Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing • Chapter 8: Business Travel • Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events • Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services 1 6/19/2013 Return to table of contents Chapter 1: Doing Business in Russia • Market Overview • Market Challenges • Market Opportunities • Market Entry Strategy • Market Fact Sheet Link Market Overview Return to top • With a vast landmass, extensive natural resources, more than 140 million consumers, a growing middle class, and almost unlimited infrastructure needs, Russia remains one of the most promising and exciting markets for U.S. exporters. • Russia is the world’s 11th largest economy by nominal gross domestic product (GDP) and 7th largest by purchasing power parity (PPP). It has the highest per capita GDP ($13,400) of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). Russia is an upper middle income country, with a highly educated and trained workforce and sophisticated, discerning consumers. • Russia’s economy is still recovering from the economic crisis that began in 2008, with GDP growth estimated at 2.8% for 2013. • In terms of trade in goods, Russia was the United States’ 27th largest export market and the 16th largest exporter to the United States in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of What Ceos Have Told Us in the Last CEO Study We Conducted, and I Will Explain What This Study Is About
    ST. PETERSBURG INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC FORUM JUNE 21–23, 2012 Securing the Future RESULTS OF 2012 CEO STUDY FOR GROWTH MARKETS: PRESENTATION OF IBM REPORT JUNE 22, 2012 — 12:30–13:30, Pavilion 5, Hall 5.3 St. Petersburg, Russia 2012 Moderator: Dmitry Solopov, Editor-in-Chief, Radiostation Kommersant FM Panelists: Bruno Di Leo, Senior Vice-President, IBM Corporation Nikolay Nikiforov, Minister of Connection and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation D. Solopov: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to our session, which sees the presentation of a new report by IBM. I am proud to present our speakers: Bruno di Leo, Senior Vice- President, IBM Corporation; and Nikolay Nikiforov, Minister of Connection and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation. So, Bruno, you are the first to speak. Please discuss the new IBM Report with our audience. We will have the opportunity to see some highlights, which are extremely interesting. Tell us all about your findings. B. di Leo: Excellent. Good afternoon everybody and thank you for being here. Nikolay, we very much appreciate your presence. It is an honour for IBM to have you here on this panel. I will deliver a presentation, which is a summary of what CEOs have told us in the last CEO Study we conducted, and I will explain what this study is about. I think that the richest part of this panel will be the question and answer session and the discussion we might have afterwards on how this applies to Russia and whether this reflects what CEOs in the industry are saying in Russia. The first comment I want to make to the audience is aimed at putting this study in perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • 79 Innopolis University Today
    INNOPOLIS UNIVERSITY Goal 2022 Key Facts Innopolis University is a Russian higher education institution, a world-class university focused on education and scientific research in the field 4 000 of IT and Robotics. Bachelor’s 1 500 It is a private university created without involvement of budget funds degree students Master’s and supported solely by sponsor contributions and endowments. and PhD students Innopolis University is a federal platform for testing and introduction of modern educational programs in the sphere of Information Technology based on best Russian and international academic practices. 500 It is a platform for effective interaction between science, education Faculty members and business established due to the initial commitment of the University to the needs of the IT sector. Education and research areas: - Software Engineering; Mission - Robotics; - Big Data; Innopolis University forms a generation of experts - Secure Systems and Network Engineering; who will take the Russian IT industry to - Game Development and Machine Graphics. a new competitive level and make human life more comfortable and safe. Autonomous noncommercial organization of higher education «Innopolis University» History December 2012. Establishment of Innopolis University. July 2014. The University received a License to deliver higher education programs. Agreement on Cooperation with Carnegie Mellon University. September 2014. Students enrolled during the second admission session started their training August 2013. The first group of students started Master’s degree in the intensive Bachelor and Master's degree programs. In total, 1 500 applications received. education in the framework of a joint project of Innopolis University 50 candidates selected. and Carnegie Mellon University. In total, 700 applications received.
    [Show full text]
  • UNCLASSIFIED Report to Congress Pursuant To
    UNCLASSIFIED Report to Congress Pursuant to Section 241 of the Countering America's Adversaries Througb Sanctions Act of 2017 Regarding Senior Foreign Political Figures and Oligarchs in the Russian Federation and Russian Parastatal Entities January 29, 2018 Section 241 of the Countering America' s Adversaries Tbrough Sanctions Act of 2017 (САА TSA) requires the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, to submit to the appropriate congressional committees 180 days after enactment а detailed report оп senior political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation (Section 241 (a)(l )) and on Russian parastatal entities (Section 241 (а)(2)). Pursuant to Section 241(Ь), the report shall Ье submitted in an unclassified form but may have а classified annex. This is the unclassifi.ed portion of the report. Section 241(а)(1) - Senior Foreign Political Figures and Oligarchs in the Russian Federation As required Ьу Section 241 (a)( l)(A) of CAATSA, the Department ofthe Treasury is providing in this unclassified report а list of senior foreign political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation, as determined Ьу their closeness to the Russian regime and their net worth. For purposes of this unclassified portion of the report, this determination was made based оп objective criteria related to individuals' official position in the case of senior political figures, or а net worth of $1 billion or more for oligarchs. То determine the list of senior political figures, the Department of the Treasury considered the definition in CAATSA Section 24 1 (с)(2) , which incorporates Ьу reference the definition of "senior foreign political figure" in section 1О10.605 , title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing the Composition of Russia's New Cabinet and Presidential
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION DIRECTORATE B POLICY DEPARTMENT BRIEFING THE COMPOSITION OF RUSSIA’S NEW CABINET AND PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION, AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE Abstract The new Russian government represents a compromise between Vladimir Putin and Dmitry Medvedev. Although the latter had to step aside last September and relinquish the presidency, he was given more latitude to assemble the cabinet of ministers than in 2008. The new Russian power configuration following the recent reshuffle is more complex than it was previously. There are in fact now more centres of decision-making. The division of labour between the president and the prime minister will not necessarily correspond to the letter of the constitution. One of the key questions at the moment is the role that the president’s new aides and advisors will play. The emergence of a 'parallel cabinet' in the Kremlin would complicate the decision-making system and would leave Dmitry Medvedev in a weaker position. The situation in Moscow is rapidly changing. The authorities appear to be sending conflicting signals. While Dmitry Medvedev had made some concessions in December on the election of the governors and the registration of political parties, we note that in the last several weeks he has been tempted to backpedal. EP/EXPO/B/AFET/FWC/2009-01/Lot1/38 June 2012 PE 457.132 EN Policy Department DG External Policies This briefing was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs following a proposal by the Policy Department, DG EXPO. AUTHOR: Arnaud DUBIEN, Senior Research Fellow, IRIS, Belgium ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE: Julien CRAMPES Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department WIB 06 M 075 rue Wiertz 60 B-1047 Brussels Editorial Assistant: Elina STERGATOU LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Editorial closing date: 13 June 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Military Strategy and Doctrine
    HOWARD AND CZEKAJ RUSSIA’S RUSSIA’S MILITARY STRATEGY MILITARY AND DOCTRINE STRATEGY Russia’s Military Strategy and Doctrine is designed to educate Russia watchers, AND DOCTRINE STRATEGY RUSSIA’S MILITARY policymakers, military leaders, and the broader foreign policy community about the Russian AND DOCTRINE Armed Forces and security apparatus across the full spectrum of geographic, doctrinal and domain areas. Each chapter addresses a different strategic-level issue related to the Russian military, ranging from “hybrid” warfare doctrine, to the role nuclear weapons play in its strategy, to cyber and electromagnetic warfare, to Moscow’s posture in the Arctic or the Black Sea, to the lessons its Armed Forces have learned from their ongoing operations in Syria and eastern Ukraine. And each section of the book is written by one of the world’s foremost experts on that theme of Russia’s military development. ­■­■­■ The key questions emphasized by this book include “how Russia fights wars” and “how its experiences with modern conflicts are shaping the evolution of Russia’s military strategy, capabilities and doctrine.” The book’s value comes not only from a piecemeal look at granular Russian strategies in each of the theaters and domains where its Armed Forces may act, but more importantly this study seeks to present a unifying description of Russia’s military strategy as a declining but still formidable global power. Russia’s Military Strategy and Doctrine will be an essential reference for US national security thinkers, NATO defense planners and policymakers the world over who must deal with the potential military and security challenges posed by Moscow.
    [Show full text]
  • Countering a Resurgent Russia Hearing Committee
    COUNTERING A RESURGENT RUSSIA HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION May 1, 2019 Serial No. 116–31 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/, http://docs.house.gov, or http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–135PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York, Chairman BRAD SHERMAN, California MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Ranking GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York Member ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia STEVE CHABOT, Ohio THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida JOE WILSON, South Carolina KAREN BASS, California SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts TED S. YOHO, Florida DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois AMI BERA, California LEE ZELDIN, New York JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas JIM SENSENBRENNER, Wisconsin DINA TITUS, Nevada ANN WAGNER, Missouri ADRIANO ESPAILLAT, New York BRIAN MAST, Florida TED LIEU, California FRANCIS ROONEY, Florida SUSAN WILD, Pennsylvania BRIAN FITZPATRICK, Pennsylvania DEAN PHILLIPS, Minnesota JOHN CURTIS, Utah ILHAN OMAR, Minnesota KEN BUCK, Colorado COLIN ALLRED, Texas RON WRIGHT, Texas ANDY LEVIN, Michigan GUY RESCHENTHALER, Pennsylvania ABIGAIL SPANBERGER, Virginia TIM BURCHETT, Tennessee CHRISSY HOULAHAN, Pennsylvania GREG PENCE, Indiana TOM MALINOWSKI, New Jersey STEVE WATKINS, Kansas DAVID TRONE, Maryland MIKE GUEST, Mississippi JIM COSTA, California JUAN VARGAS, California VICENTE GONZALEZ, Texas JASON STEINBAUM, Staff Director BRENDAN SHIELDS, Republican Staff Director (II) C O N T E N T S Page WITNESSES Nuland, Ambassador Victoria, Nonresident Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy, Center on the United States and Europe, Brookings Institution, and Former Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs and Former United States Permanent Representative to NATO ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Programs of Junior Achievement Russia
    EVALUATION OF THE PROGRAMS OF JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT RUSSIA Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development/Russia Under: Evaluation IQC No. AEP-I-00-00-00023-00 Task Order No. 851 Evaluation Team: C. Stark Biddle, Team Leader Thomas R. Hutson Alexander Borovikh Ekaterina V. Greshnova Submitted by: Development Associates, Inc. 1730 North Lynn Street Arlington, VA 22209-2023 November 16, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ ii Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 Background......................................................................................................................................1 Purpose of Evaluation......................................................................................................................3 Approach..........................................................................................................................................4 Caveats.............................................................................................................................................5 Central Findings...............................................................................................................................5 Conclusions....................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]