Fort Huachuca Sentinel Landscape

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fort Huachuca Sentinel Landscape G A Muleshoe Ranch S A L N I Prescribed Fire Conservation Ranching: This term describes most modern T A U C R Organizations working on operations because long-term productivity depends on keeping Map Key A O T W A I N soil in place, maintaining grass cover, and retaining water in the system. Private Lands: Non-urban parcels L Muleshoe Ranch C H Sentinel Landscape restoration I M E N S This map shows a few examples, among the many in the Sentinel area, vary from small-acreage residential holdings A O Preserve T E who welcome volunteers U R of places that are being actively improved through water retention to large ranches, including some with land Map Area M N O M structures, grassland restoration, wildlife accommodations, and regular T Appleton-Whittell Research Ranch under permanent conservation status. U O monitoring of resource conditions, frequently with the help of partners. N Hot Springs A U researchranch.audubon.org T I Gould’s Turkey N Wildlife Corridor N T Many properties have permanent protection as ranch land through Public Lands: USDA Forest Service A A I S N I N Arizona Antelope Foundation azantelope.org conservation easements. and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) S S S a Teran Watershed D balance resource protection and activities n Cienega Watershed Partnership cienega.org Enhancement O P Fire: For centuries, sky island grasslands, woodlands, and forests such as recreation, grazing, mining, and e S d Coronado National Memorial nps.gov/coro r C burned every 5 to 20 years. Frequent fire kept areas open and o A energy development on lands that belong R B i Borderlands Restoration borderlandsrestoration.orgE grassy. This arrangement tamed fire behavior—understory burned to the citizens of the U.S. v Z e A r Willcox S but trees survived or resprouted. A century of very little fire led to Allen Flat Sky Island Alliance skyislandalliance.org M TUCSON O over-dense woods, and managers now work to reverse that trend via State Trust Lands: These lands R Habitat Restoration U I N N The Nature Conservancy nature.org thinning and prescribed fire projects. are held in trust for beneficiaries, chiefly TA C I N S K-12 education. The Arizona State Land O 10 Grasslands: Southeastern Arizona’s grasslands are productive N Department serves as agent and fiduciary. Other partners and rich ecosystems. Drought, lack of fire, invasive species, and Trust land is not public land; it is sold and M overgrazing have degraded some grasslands, but modern management leased under principles of highest and O Arizona Game and Fish Department U helps these areas heal. Erosion control holds soil, shrub removal and N best use. Undeveloped10 State Lands serve ArizonaWillcox Department Playa of Environmental Quality fire reduce woody species, creative grazing prevents over-utilization, T as open space and wildlife habitat. A ArizonaWildlife Department Area of Forestry and Fire Management and attention to weeds slows their spread. I N Urban S Wilcox Playa Arizona State Parks Research: The Sentinel Landscape hosts three research sites S N Arizona Land and Water Trust that dedicate 50,000 acres to learning about the area’s natural Wildlife Corridors: Projects T M 191 resources. Researchers from all over the world work at these sites, Bureau of Land Management protect wildlife travel routes between which also have value as climate monitoring stations and open space. mountain ranges. N O Cascabel Conservation Association Scientists also study grasslands, wildlife, water, fire, and livestock O Arizona Trail: The first 115 miles of G Cochise County production practices (and much more) on other Sentinel private and A 19 R public lands, including Fort Huachuca. the magnificent trail that crosses the entire D Vail Coronado National Forest Gould’s Turkey state illustrates the Sentinel Landscape’s E L Fort Huachuca Water: Keeping precious water available for people, natural recreational riches. There are hundreds more T T ecosystems, and livestock is key to the health of the Sentinel I miles of hiking trails plus places for hunting, L Fry Fire District Landscape. People are conserving water in developed areas, and many biking, birdwatching and other activities. partnerships monitor and maintain water in streams, springs, and Hereford Natural Resource Conservation District the aquifer. Ranchers are providing water for wildlife as they ensure Buffalo Soldier Electronic Huachuca Gould’s Chapter/NWTF supplies for livestock. Other projects improve watersheds to slow runoff Testing Range Boundary Natural Resources Conservation Service and allow local infiltration of storm water. Davidson Canyon Major Streams Wildlife Corridor Dragoon Fuels Project Cochise 10 Stronghold Santa Cruz Natural Resource Conservation District Wildlife: Loss of habitat has reduced wildlife numbers all over Benson Sahuarita Corona De Tucson the world. The Sentinel Landscape contains large patches of Santa Rita Experimental Range Restricted Air Space: Maintained D 83 habitat for important species. Keeping the patches connected helps by Fort Huachuca in support of R UA-Cochise County Cooperative Extension A Stronghold Firewise all kinds of animals, including pollinators, have enough space to feed manned and unmanned aviation G S US Fish & Wildlife Service O N 90 and breed. Preserving wetlands and removing invasive species have operations. St David O T 191 N US Geological Survey increased numbers of rare aquatic species. Agreements between M Miles M wildlife groups and landowners aid coexistence of wildlife, humans, E Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed R O Green Valley I U and livestock. P 0 5 10 N M T E St. David Upland A r Little Joe I e S Restoration N v Restoration N i S k I R e A e T z r N 80 u C Kartchner r Las Simpson Spring U C Prairie Dog a Caverns O g Restoration a Santa Rita Reintroductione M State Park t n Cienegas Experimental Range n McGrew Spring e San Pedro E a i Stewardship S N C National Fort Huachuca O Riparian Las Cienegas T S S Grassland Restoration Conservation T National Walnut Gulch 19 N E I Greaterville Frogs Area H Experimental Watershed A W Conservation Sentinel T N FROG Project U Area Antelope-friendly Sands Grassland Madera O Fencing 82 M Restoration Tombstone Canyon Rose Tree Landscape A 83 Ranch T M U I S TA N 82 Brookline Ranch R Vera Earl Ranch G M T N A Elgin S Restoration Partnership T Sonoita N Babacomari San Pedro A 82 Ranch Babacomari Beaver Reintroduction 80 S S B a a b Erosion Control 90 o n c o v e r m a r i R i Antelope-friendly P e 191 Gould’s Turkey Fencing Babacomari-Research d Sierra Vista r Ranch Firewise o EOP Patagonia Wildlife R i Corridor v e r Whitewater Draw Fort Huachuca Appleton-Whittell Wildlife Area Research Ranch Backyard Patagonia-Sonoita Tamarisk Removal Erosion Control 47 Ranch Whitewater Creek Preserve Native Plant Nursery Draw Patagonia 90 Sierra Vista San Pedro Coalmine Spring M 19 k House e U r e C L a i t E o H Patagonia Lake n o Fort Huachuca S Patagonia Firewise U M State Park A Prescribed Fire C O A C 92 N E H U L O N Rio Rico H U Brown Canyon 80 I C T P L L San Pedro A S Scotia Canyon A Wetlands A I T Restoration Prescribed Fire N A Ramsey Canyon S 82 G M Banning Creek O O Preserve The Sentinel Landscape Restoration Partnership exists to facilitate N Firewise Bisbee Parker Lake U I A cooperative projects that improve water quality and quantity, range N M T O A Ramsey Canyon and forest conditions, wildlife habitat, the status of rare species, U I Firewise N N T S and other vital features of the working and natural lands within A I the Landscape and nearby ecologically connected areas. This map N S Gould’s Turkey highlights efforts that meet these goals as well as help preserve open 80 Palominas Recharge 92 spaces for the testing and training missions of Fort Huachuca. The Coronado Nogales Riparian Pasture San Jose Ranch descriptions below outline restoration challenges that these projects Restoration National Memorial San Rafael Border Savanna Horseshoe Draw are meeting. Mapped projects are just a sampling among many State Natural Area Project Agaves and Bats others taking place. UNITED STATES / MEXICO BORDER Conserving grasslands and forests Fort Huachuca Sentinel Landscape Restoration Partnership that provide habitat, water, Fort Huachuca Prescribed Fire: Fort Huachuca works with the Patagonia Wildlife Corridor: Borderlands livelihoods, and recreation in Conservation Ranching Coronado National Forest to conduct prescribed fires that reduce Research Wildlife Restoration of Patagonia and partners are protecting 47 Ranch: On the 47 Ranch in the Mule Mountains, attention to ranch- woody vegetation and make ecosystems more fire-tolerant. Thou- Appleton-Whittell Research Ranch: On the Research Ranch, Agaves and Bats: Agaves are in decline at Coronado National lands that link the Santa Rita Mountains with the Cochise, Pima, and Santa Cruz ing is inseparable from a long view towards sustaining livestock and sands of acres of grassland and oak savanna have been treated at the National Audubon Society and partners maintain a native grass- Memorial due to past grazing practices and present dominance of Patagonias and Canelo Hills. Preserving travel routes wildlife. Conservation easements guarantee long-term status as ranch regular intervals since the 1980s. The burn program also allows for land ecosystem on private and public lands. Chief methods are invasive Lehmann lovegrass. The National Park Service and local middle for large mammals such as black bear and mountain counties, Arizona land, and 2500 retention structures improve water capture and infil- safe execution of Army training activities and protects developments.
Recommended publications
  • Section 9-Sierra Vista Subbasin of the Upper San Pedro Basin, Arizona
    Section 9.—Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality of the Basin-Fill Aquifer in the Sierra Vista Subbasin of the Upper San Pedro Basin, Arizona By David W. Anning and James M. Leenhouts in Conceptual Understanding and Groundwater Quality of Selected Basin- Fill Aquifers in the Southwestern United States Edited by Susan A. Thiros, Laura M. Bexfield, David W. Anning, and Jena M. Huntington National Water-Quality Assessment Program Professional Paper 1781 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ii Contents Basin Overview .........................................................................................................................................145 Water Development History .....................................................................................................................147 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................148 Conceptual Understanding of the Groundwater Flow System ...........................................................149 Water Budget ....................................................................................................................................149 Groundwater Movement .................................................................................................................152 Effects of Natural and Human Factors on Groundwater Quality ......................................................157 Summary......................................................................................................................................................160
    [Show full text]
  • Crime, Law Enforcement, and Punishment
    Shirley Papers 48 Research Materials, Crime Series Inventory Box Folder Folder Title Research Materials Crime, Law Enforcement, and Punishment Capital Punishment 152 1 Newspaper clippings, 1951-1988 2 Newspaper clippings, 1891-1938 3 Newspaper clippings, 1990-1993 4 Newspaper clippings, 1994 5 Newspaper clippings, 1995 6 Newspaper clippings, 1996 7 Newspaper clippings, 1997 153 1 Newspaper clippings, 1998 2 Newspaper clippings, 1999 3 Newspaper clippings, 2000 4 Newspaper clippings, 2001-2002 Crime Cases Arizona 154 1 Cochise County 2 Coconino County 3 Gila County 4 Graham County 5-7 Maricopa County 8 Mohave County 9 Navajo County 10 Pima County 11 Pinal County 12 Santa Cruz County 13 Yavapai County 14 Yuma County Arkansas 155 1 Arkansas County 2 Ashley County 3 Baxter County 4 Benton County 5 Boone County 6 Calhoun County 7 Carroll County 8 Clark County 9 Clay County 10 Cleveland County 11 Columbia County 12 Conway County 13 Craighead County 14 Crawford County 15 Crittendon County 16 Cross County 17 Dallas County 18 Faulkner County 19 Franklin County Shirley Papers 49 Research Materials, Crime Series Inventory Box Folder Folder Title 20 Fulton County 21 Garland County 22 Grant County 23 Greene County 24 Hot Springs County 25 Howard County 26 Independence County 27 Izard County 28 Jackson County 29 Jefferson County 30 Johnson County 31 Lafayette County 32 Lincoln County 33 Little River County 34 Logan County 35 Lonoke County 36 Madison County 37 Marion County 156 1 Miller County 2 Mississippi County 3 Monroe County 4 Montgomery County
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Coronado National Forest
    Douglas RANGER DISTRICT www.skyislandaction.org 3-1 State of the Coronado Forest DRAFT 11.05.08 DRAFT 11.05.08 State of the Coronado Forest 3-2 www.skyislandaction.org CHAPTER 3 Dragoon Ecosystem Management Area The Dragoon Mountains are located at the heart of development. Crossing Highway 80, one passes the Coronado National Forest. The Forest through another narrow strip of private land and encompasses 52,411 acres of the mountains in an area enters the BLM-managed San Pedro Riparian some 15 miles long by 6 miles wide. The Dragoon National Conservation Area. On the west side of the Ecosystem Management Area (EMA) is the smallest San Pedro River, the valley (mostly under private and on the Forest making it sensitive to activities state land jurisdiction) slopes up to the Whetstone happening both on the Forest and in lands Mountains, another Ecosystem Management Area of surrounding the Forest. Elevations range from the Coronado National Forest. approximately 4,700 feet to 7,519 feet at the summit of Due to the pattern of ecological damage and Mount Glenn. (See Figure 3.1 for an overview map of unmanaged visitor use in the Dragoons, we propose the Dragoon Ecosystem Management Area.) the area be divided into multiple management units ( The Dragoons are approximately sixty miles 3.2) with a strong focus on changing management in southeast of Tucson and thirty-five miles northeast of the Dragoon Westside Management Area (DWMA). Sierra Vista. Land adjacent to the western boundary of In order to limit overall impacts on the Westside, a the Management Area is privately owned and remains visitor permit system with a cap on daily visitor relatively remote and sparsely roaded compared to the numbers is recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona by Ric Windmiller 3
    THE COCHISE QUARTERLY Volume 1 Number 2 June, 1971 CONTENTS Early Hunters and Gatherers in Southeastern Arizona by Ric Windmiller 3 From Rocks to Gadgets A History of Cochise County, Arizona by Carl Trischka 16 A Cochise Culture Human Skeleton From Southeastern Arizona by Kenneth R. McWilliams 24 Cover designed by Ray Levra, Cochise College A Publication of the Cochise County Historical and Archaeological Society P. O. Box 207 Pearce, Arizona 85625 2 EARLY HUNTERS AND GATHERERS IN SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA* By Ric Windmiller Assistant Archaeologist, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona During the summer, 1970, the Arizona State Museum, in co- operation with the State Highway Department and Cochise County, excavated an ancient pre-pottery archaeological site and remains of a mammoth near Double Adobe, Arizona.. Although highway salvage archaeology has been carried out in the state since 1955, last sum- mer's work on Whitewater Draw, near Double Adobe, represented the first time that either the site of early hunters and gatherers or re- mains of extinct mammoth had been recovered through the salvage program. In addition, excavation of the pre-pottery Cochise culture site on a new highway right-of-way has revealed vital evidence for the reconstruction of prehistoric life-ways in southeastern Arizona, an area that is little known archaeologically, yet which has produced evidence to indicate that it was early one of the most important areas for the development of and a settled way of life in the Southwest. \ Early Big Game Hunters Southeastern Arizona is also important as the area in which the first finds in North America of extinct faunal remains overlying cul- tural evidences of man were scientifically excavated.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Bowie U.S
    National Park Service Fort Bowie U.S. Department of the Interior Fort Bowie National Historic Site The Chiricahua Apaches Introduction The origin of the name "Apache" probably stems from the Zuni "apachu". Apaches in fact referred to themselves with variants of "nde", simply meaning "the people". By 1850, Apache culture was a blend of influences from the peoples of the Great Plains, Great Basin, and the Southwest, particularly the Pueblos, and as time progressed—Spanish, Mexican, and the recently arriving American settler. The Apache Tribes Chiricahua speak an Athabaskan language, relating Geronimo was a member of the Bedonkohe, who them to tribes of western Canada. Migration from were closely related to the Chihenne (sometimes this region brought them to the southern plains by referred to as the Mimbres); famous leaders of the 1300, and into areas of the present-day American band included Mangas Coloradas and Victorio. Southwest and northwestern Mexico by 1500. This The Nehdni primarily dwelled in northern migration coincided with a northward thrust of Mexico under the leadership of Tuh. the Spanish into the Rio Grande and San Pedro Valleys. Cochise was a Chokonen Chiricahua leader who rose to leadership around 1856. The Chockonen Chiricahuas of southern Arizona and New primarily resided in the area of Apache Pass and Mexico were further subdivided into four bands: the Dragoon Mountains to the west. Bedonkohe, Chokonen, Chihenne, and Nehdni. Their total population ranged from 1,000 to 1,500 people. Organization and Apache population was thinly spread, scattered of Apache government and was the position that Family Life into small groups across large territories, tribal chiefs such as Cochise held.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES LIST (List Follows the Newest AOU Order)
    Southeast Arizona The Nature Conservancy Legacy Club August 11- 18, 2012 SPECIES LIST (List follows the newest AOU order) Black-bellied Whistling-Duck––4 in the wetland near Elgin, whistling as they flew Mexican Duck (Mallard)––at the Elgin wetland and Willcox’s “Lake Cochise” Northern Shoveler––a few lounging at the Willcox ponds Ruddy Duck––one male and a female, paddling behind the reeds at Willcox golf pond Scaled Quail––a few glimpsed near Whitewater Draw, seen well as they crossed the road Gambel’s Quail––small groups seen almost daily Montezuma Quail––heard only, whistling in Huachuca Canyon, what a tease! Pied-billed Grebe––1 at the Willcox golf pond Great Blue Heron––at the Elgin wetland and flying behind Casa de San Pedro Black-crowned Night-Heron––1 immature flushed at the Willcox golf pond White-faced Ibis––2 distant birds at Whitewater and others flying over the Willcox ponds Black Vulture––a single perched on the cliff above Patagonia’s roadside rest, great scope views for all. Turkey Vulture––throughout White-tailed Kite––3 in the Elgin grasslands, what a thrill to see them at dusk, after a very full day Northern Harrier––1 in the Elgin grasslands Cooper’s Hawk––1 near Patagonia-Sonoita Creek Preserve, one very close by as we passed it on the road leaving Tucson Gray Hawk––heard only in several locations in the lowlands. With ample time in two of its favorite haunts, we were surprised not to get “cracking” views. Swainson’s Hawk––fairly common along the roadsides on most days, particularly noticeable near Portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Clay Mineralogy of the Willcox Playa and Its Drainage Basin, Cochise County, Arizona
    Clay mineralogy of the Willcox Playa and its drainage basin, Cochise County, Arizona Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Pipkin, Bernard W. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 09/10/2021 08:05:33 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565620 CLAY MINERALOGY OF THE WILLCOX PLAYA AND ITS DRAINAGE BASIN, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA Bernard W/ Pipkin A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1964 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Bernard W. Pipkin entitled MClay Mineralogy of the Willcox Playa and its Drainage Basin, Cochise County, Arizona'* be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _____________ ss e/tat ion Director DateFa7^ / After inspection of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* ♦This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examina­ tion. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final ex­ amination.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Open-File Report 2009-1269, Appendix 1
    Appendix 1. Summary of location, basin, and hydrological-regime characteristics for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging stations in Arizona and parts of adjacent states that were used to calibrate hydrological-regime models [Hydrologic provinces: 1, Plateau Uplands; 2, Central Highlands; 3, Basin and Range Lowlands; e, value not present in database and was estimated for the purpose of model development] Average percent of Latitude, Longitude, Site Complete Number of Percent of year with Hydrologic decimal decimal Hydrologic altitude, Drainage area, years of perennial years no flow, Identifier Name unit code degrees degrees province feet square miles record years perennial 1950-2005 09379050 LUKACHUKAI CREEK NEAR 14080204 36.47750 109.35010 1 5,750 160e 5 1 20% 2% LUKACHUKAI, AZ 09379180 LAGUNA CREEK AT DENNEHOTSO, 14080204 36.85389 109.84595 1 4,985 414.0 9 0 0% 39% AZ 09379200 CHINLE CREEK NEAR MEXICAN 14080204 36.94389 109.71067 1 4,720 3,650.0 41 0 0% 15% WATER, AZ 09382000 PARIA RIVER AT LEES FERRY, AZ 14070007 36.87221 111.59461 1 3,124 1,410.0 56 56 100% 0% 09383200 LEE VALLEY CR AB LEE VALLEY RES 15020001 33.94172 109.50204 1 9,440e 1.3 6 6 100% 0% NR GREER, AZ. 09383220 LEE VALLEY CREEK TRIBUTARY 15020001 33.93894 109.50204 1 9,440e 0.5 6 0 0% 49% NEAR GREER, ARIZ. 09383250 LEE VALLEY CR BL LEE VALLEY RES 15020001 33.94172 109.49787 1 9,400e 1.9 6 6 100% 0% NR GREER, AZ. 09383400 LITTLE COLORADO RIVER AT GREER, 15020001 34.01671 109.45731 1 8,283 29.1 22 22 100% 0% ARIZ.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtail Chub Repatriated to the Blue River
    Volume 1 | Issue 2 | Summer 2015 Roundtail Chub Repatriated to the Blue River Inside this issue: With a fish exclusion barrier in place and a marked decline of catfish, the time was #TRENDINGNOW ................. 2 right for stocking Roundtail Chub into a remote eastern Arizona stream. New Initiative Launched for Southwest Native Trout.......... 2 On April 30, 2015, the Reclamation, and Marsh and Blue River. A total of 222 AZ 6-Species Conservation Department stocked 876 Associates LLC embarked on a Roundtail Chub were Agreement Renewal .............. 2 juvenile Roundtail Chub from mission to find, collect and stocked into the Blue River. IN THE FIELD ........................ 3 ARCC into the Blue River near bring into captivity some During annual monitoring, Recent and Upcoming AZGFD- the Juan Miller Crossing. Roundtail Chub for captive led Activities ........................... 3 five months later, Additional augmentation propagation from the nearest- Department staff captured Spikedace Stocked into Spring stockings to enhance the genetic neighbor population in Eagle Creek ..................................... 3 42 of the stocked chub, representation of the Blue River Creek. The Aquatic Research some of which had travelled BACK AT THE PONDS .......... 4 Roundtail Chub will be and Conservation Center as far as seven miles Native Fish Identification performed later this year. (ARCC) held and raised the upstream from the stocking Workshop at ARCC................ 4 offspring of those chub for Stockings will continue for the location. future stocking into the Blue next several years until that River. population is established in the Department biologists conducted annual Blue River and genetically In 2012, the partners delivered monitoring in subsequent mimics the wild source captive-raised juvenile years, capturing three chub population.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Flows and Water Demands in Arizona
    Environmental Flows and Water A University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center Project Demands in Arizona ater is an increasingly scarce resource and is essential for Arizona’s future. Figure 1. Elements of Environmental Flow WWith Arizona’s population growth and Occurring in Seasonal Hydrographs continued drought, citizens and water managers have been taking a closer look at water supplies in the state. Municipal, industrial, and agricul- tural water users are well-represented demand sectors, but water supplies and management to benefit the environment are not often consid- ered. This bulletin explains environmental water demands in Arizona and introduces information essential for considering environmental water demands in water management discussions. Considering water for the environment is impor- tant because humans have an interconnected and interdependent relationship with the envi- ronment. Nature provides us recreation oppor- tunities, economic benefits, and water supplies Data Source: to sustain our communities. USGS stream gage data Figure 2: Human Demand and Current Flow in Arizona Environmental water demands (or environmental flow) (circle size indicates relative amount of water) refers to how much water is needed in a watercourse to sustain a healthy ecosystem. Defining environmental water demand goes beyond the ecology and hydrol- Maximum ogy of a system and should include consideration for Flows how much water is required to achieve an agreed Industrial 40.8 maf Industrial SW Municipal upon level of river health, as determined by the GW 1% GW 8% water-using community. Arizona’s native ani- 4% mals and plants depend upon dynamic flows commonly described according to the natural Municipal SW flow regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Draft Land and Resource Management Plan I Contents
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Coronado National Forest Southwestern Region Draft Land and Resource MB-R3-05-7 October 2013 Management Plan Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona, and Hidalgo County, New Mexico The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Front cover photos (clockwise from upper left): Meadow Valley in the Huachuca Ecosystem Management Area; saguaros in the Galiuro Mountains; deer herd; aspen on Mt. Lemmon; Riggs Lake; Dragoon Mountains; Santa Rita Mountains “sky island”; San Rafael grasslands; historic building in Cave Creek Canyon; golden columbine flowers; and camping at Rose Canyon Campground. Printed on recycled paper • October 2013 Draft Land and Resource Management Plan Coronado National Forest Cochise, Graham, Pima, Pinal, and Santa Cruz Counties, Arizona Hidalgo County, New Mexico Responsible Official: Regional Forester Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Boulevard, SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 842-3292 For Information Contact: Forest Planner Coronado National Forest 300 West Congress, FB 42 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 388-8300 TTY 711 [email protected] Contents Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]