Copper Coordination in Low Chalcocite and Djurleite . and Other Copper-Rich
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AmericanMineralogist, Volume 66, pages 807-818,l98I Coppercoordination in low chalcociteand djurleite . and other copper-richsulfides Howeno T. EveNs.Jn. U.S. GeologicalSurvey Reston,Virginia 22092 Abstract The new structure determinationsof low chalcocite,CurS, and djurleite' Cupe3sS, have provided a large number ofobservations ofthe coordination behavior ofcopper vrith sulfur in copper-richsulfides. Ranges of Cu-S bond lengths are2.18 to 2.244 in linear CuS, groups; 2.21to 2.60Ain triangular CuS3groups; 2.23 to 2.904 in tetrahedralCuSa groups. Cu-Cu dis- tancesrange from 2.45A upward, the most common around 2.77A. These observationsare comparedwith structural data from other copper-rich sulfides,in which the tetrahedral, tri- angular and linear Cu-S bond configurations frequently show large distortions and wide var- iations in bond lengths. Introduction atmosphericpressure.) A representationof the phase diagram in the CurS end of this range,adapted from In nature the strategicmetal copperis usually con- Potter (19'17),is shown in Figure l. centrated as a sulfide, or sometimesas native metal One major ore of copper is chalcocite, Cu'S. Its (as in the Michigan deposits).When weathering con- crystal structureis complex,requiring a (pseudo)or- ditions are favorable,copper may be concentratedin thorhombic unit cell senta,ining 96 formula units. oxide or oxysalt systems(for example,in Chile). In Rahlfs (1936)first measuredthis unit cell; later Buer- each of the two chemical systems-sulfide and ger and Buerger(194) made a thorough study of the oxide--+opper behavesin a highly characteristic and orthorhombic crystallography.The existenceof the distinctively different manner. The fully oxidized closeJyingphase Cu, no, rrS was not suspecteduntil it state (+2) in oxide systemshas been continuously was discovered by Djurle (1958). This phase was and intensively studied by inorganic chemists for confirmed and established as a naturally-occurring centuries,and the behavior ofcopper in aqueoussys- mineral speciesby Roseboom(1962) and Morimoto tems is relatively well understood. Less work has (1962);it was appropriately named djurleite. Potter been done on anhydrousoxide (or halide) systemsor (1977) found that the homogeneityrange x in Cu,S on the lower valencestates, and even lesson sulfide for low chalcocite is very narrow (x : 1.997 to systems. 2.000+0.002),but much broader for djurleite (x : The copper-sulfur system itself is very complex, 1.934to 1.965+0.002).The crystallographyof djur- and has been well defined only in the last 15 years. leite is even more complex than that of low chalco- The phasediagram was first adequatelymapped out cite, requiring (accordingto Takeda, Donnay, Rose- by Roseboom (1966). The system has since been boom and Appleman, 1967) an orthorhombic unit thoroughly restudied by Cook (1972) and by Potter cell containing 128 Cu.S. Low chalcociteand djur- (1977),both confirming and refining Roseboom'sre- leite are physically difficult to distinguish and prob- sults. Potter used electrochemicaltechniques which ably equally common. Many samples labelled made it possibleto define both stableand metastable chalcocite are actually mainly djurleite, or an in- phase regions accurately in the low temperature timately intergrown mixture of low chalcocite and ranges down to room temperature, which are not djurleite. readily accessibleto other methods. Earler, Djurle Because of their commercial importance low (1958) used X-ray techniquesto identify and define chalcocite and djurleite have been the focus of inter- the various phasesin the range CurS-CuS. (No other est in the Cu-S system.Our understandingof the na- binary compounds are known outside this range at ture of all phasesin the systemwill depend primarily 0003-004x/8I /0708-0807$02.00 807 EVANS: COPPER COORDINATION, LOW CHALCOCITE AND DII]RLEITE clinic. Both might be consideredas interstitial com- pounds of copper in a hexagonal-close-packed framework of sulfur. Consequently,both are subject to intensive twinning which tends to mimic the higher hexagonal symmetry. The twinning in djur- leite is obvious and complex, and has been carefully studied by Takeda, Donnay, and Appleman (1967). In low chalcocite a prevalent twin law results in nearly perfect superposition of monoclinic lattices to produce an apparentend-centered orthorhombic lat- tice. In this structure the lower symmetry was real- ized only when the author discovered an untwi-nned X-ray intensity distribution in ths single crystal pat- terns. The structure analyses were carried out on data collected from untwinned crystals, using the sym- bolic addition procedurefor phasedetermination. In low chalcocite,24 Cu and 12 S atoms were found in 25 the monoclinic asymmetric unit in spacn group 72r/ c; in djurleite, 62 Cu and 32 S were found in space group P2,/n No direct evidence of disorder was Fig. l. Phase diagram for the system Cu-S in the low temperatureregion near Cu2Sadapted from Potter (1977).Single- found, and all atomic sites are fully occupied. A wide phase regions are shaded. The crystallographic CulS ratios in variation of thermal motions becameapparent in the djurleite are indicated by arrows on the abscissa. anisotropic analyses.The sulfur and many of the copper atoms are not severelyelliptical and have rea- on a knowledge of their crystal structures,and the sonable root-mean-square vibration amplitudes: crystal chemical behavior of copper in such systems. -0.12A for S, -0.16A for Cu. Somecopper atoms, When the ratio of Cu to S is much below unity, cop- especially those in ambiguous coordinationo have per generallyis found in more or lessregular tetrahe- much larger and more anisotropic vibrations. With dral coordination,as in chalcopyrite.When the CulS appropriate absorption and anomalous dispersion ratio approachesor is greaterthan unity, the coordi- correctionsapplied, in anisotropicmode, the reliabil- nation tends to decrease(as to triangular in covellite, ity index convergedfor low chalcociteto R : 0.086 CuS) and becomeirregular and more complex. The for 5,155 intensity data, and for djurleite to R : author has followed a program of study of the crystal 0.116for 5,686data (Evans, 1979b). structuresof copper-rich sulfidesin order to provide Both structures are based on a fairly regular hex- a broader basis for the interpretation of copper-sul- agonal-close-packed sulfur framework. The copper fur solid state chemistry. To the present, this has in- atoms are mainly in triangular, threefold coordina- cluded crystal structure analysesof covellite (Evans tion. One feature these structureshave in common and Konnert, 1976), low chalcocite (Evans, l97l) with certain other structures (e.g., covellite, stro- and djurleite (Evans, 1979d; Details of the last two meyerite)is a CuS-typesheet in which the triangular structures, which are published elsewhere (Evans, network of sulfur atoms has alternatetriangular sites 1979b), have provided a rich body of information occupiedby copper atoms.This feature is prominent about copper in a sulfur environment. The purpose in high chalcocite, which has a hexagonal unit cell of this paper is to review this bformation and also containing 2 CurS, but according to Clava, Reidin- that provided by other copper-richsulfide structures. ger, and Wuensch(1979) these sites are only 7l per- The emphasisis on coordination geometry, and no cent occupied. Similar sheets are present in low attempt is made here to discussa theoreticalbasis for chalcociteand djurleite, but the continuousCuS net bonding. is intemrpted in an ordered manner by many vacant triangular sites. Figure 2 shows schematicviews of Crystal structuresoflow chalcociteand djurleite the unit cells of low chalcocite and djurleite viewed Low chalcocite and djurleite were originally de- along the monoclinic D axes,to illustrate the distribu- scribed as orthorhombic, but both are actually mono- tion of copper atoms with respect to these sheets, EVANS: COPPER COORDINATION. LOW CHALCOCITE AND DJURLEITE 809 s-l s Cu-l a/z Cu4 v Cu-l s z s-l --v C!-2 Cu-l Cu-3 s Hrzs,Bcu* s-2 Cu-2 -4 ---lOCu Sactlon g Cu Cu-2 ---lOCu Cu-4 s s-2 Cu- | A _-z Sccrlon Gu-3 Cu-l x s z Cu-2 Cu-2 -1 s-l C!-2 Cu- | s Cu-l s-l ab.a. Fig. 2. Schematicprojections of the crystal structures of (a) low chalcocite and @) djurleite projected along the motroclinic D axes. The hexagonal-close-packedlayers ofsulfur atoms (circles) are shown on edge in these views and the distribution ofthe copper atoms (not shown) is indicated. which appear on edgein theseviews. In low chalco- Bond distributionsin low chalcociteand djurleite cite there is one kind of sheet,S-1, containing within the cell 12 S atomsand 8 Cu atoms;in djurleite there In the structures of low chalcocite and djurleite the are two kinds of sheets,S-1 and S-2, each containing Cu-S bond lengths are between 2.18 and 2.904 16 S atoms,but with 9 Cu in S-1 and ll Cu in S-2. (somewhat arbitrarily ignoring Cu-S distances The remaining copper atoms lie at approximately r/t greater than 2.90A), although most, expecially those and% positionsbetween the sheets(except Cu(62) of clearly associatedwith triangular coordination, are djurleite, which is halfway between).Figure 2 shows less than 2.50A. Among the triangles some have the copper distribution in these different sheets. nearly equal Cu-S distancesof 2.31+0.014 (e.g., In Figure 3 stereoscopicviews of portions of the Cu(2), Cu(9), Cu(13) of low chalcocite;Cu(7), crystal structure of low chalcocite are shown viewed Cu(25), Cu(38) of djurleite), but thesehave