Governs the Making of Photocopies Or Other Reproductions of Copyrighted Materials

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Governs the Making of Photocopies Or Other Reproductions of Copyrighted Materials Warning Concerning Copyright Restrictions The Copyright Law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research. If electronic transmission of reserve material is used for purposes in excess of what constitutes "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. (Photo: Kennecott) Bingham Canyon Landslide: Analysis and Mitigation GE 487: Geological Engineering Design Spring 2015 Jake Ward 1 Honors Undergraduate Thesis Signatures: 2 Abstract On April 10, 2013, a major landslide happened at Bingham Canyon Mine near Salt Lake City, Utah. The Manefay Slide has been called the largest non-volcanic landslide in modern North American history, as it is estimated it displaced more than 145 million tons of material. No injuries or loss of life were recorded during the incident; however, the loss of valuable operating time has a number of slope stability experts wondering how to prevent future large-scale slope failure in open pit mines. This comprehensive study concerns the analysis of the landslide at Bingham Canyon Mine and the mitigation of future, large- scale slope failures. The Manefay Slide was modeled into a two- dimensional, limit equilibrium analysis program to find the controlling factors behind the slope failure. It was determined the Manefay Slide was a result of movement along a saturated, bedding plane with centralized argillic alteration. Recommendations for mitigating future slope failure are provided based on the results of the limit equilibrium analyses. 3 Table of Contents Abstract . 2 List of Figures . 5 List of Tables . 8 Introduction . 10 History of Bingham Canyon Mine . 12 i. Utah and Mining . 12 ii. Bingham Canyon Mine: Discovery and Development . 13 iii. “The Richest Hole on Earth” . 15 iv. World Wars and the Great Depression . 18 v. The Latter 20th Century and Bingham Canyon Mine Today . 20 Environmental Legacy of Bingham Canyon Mine . 22 Social and Economic Impact of the Manefay Slide . 26 Geology of the Bingham Canyon Mine . 28 i. Regional Geology: The Oquirrh Mountains . 28 ii. Geologic Rock Types . 29 iii. Structural Geology . 41 iv. Economic Geology . 47 v. Groundwater Hydrology . 58 vi. Seismicity . 60 Geotechnical Monitoring . 61 Theory: Slope Stability . 69 i. Contributory Processes . 69 ii. Challenges of Slope Stability . 74 iii. Typical Failure Mechanisms . 78 4 iv. Mohr-Coulomb Failure Relationship . 84 v. Slope Stability Analysis Methods . 86 Open Pit Mine Design & Slope Stability . 96 i. Economics of Open Pit Mining . 97 ii. Architecture of Open Pit Mining . 99 Methods . 101 i. Slide by Rocscience, Inc. 101 ii. Determining Rock Mass Properties . 104 iii. Slide Testing . 105 Analysis . 107 Discussion . 116 i. Discussion . 116 ii. Recommendations for Mitigating Future Slope Failure . 119 iii. Run Out Prediction: Volume-Fahrböschung Relationship . 121 iv. Future Work . 123 References . 124 Appendix A: Tabled Data from Direct Shear Tests . 129 Appendix B: Tabled Data from Slide . 133 Appendix C: Slope Geometry Input for Slide . 145 5 List of Figures Figure 1. Manefay Slide at Bingham Canyon Mine. Figure 2. Utah Territory map. Figure 3. Artist’s view of Bingham Canyon Mine. Figure 4. Bingham Canyon Mine today. Figure 5. Boundary of Bingham NPL Zone. Figure 6. Uinta Axis and Wasatch Fault map. Figure 7. Stratigraphic column. Figure 8. Dikes and sills in Bingham Canyon Mine open pit Figure 9. Distribution of igneous rock map. Figure 10. Bingham Syncline. Figure 11. Structural map of Bingham Canyon Mine. Figure 12. Alteration map. Figure 13. Ore body cross section. Figure 14. Economic mineral distribution map. Figure 15. Aquifer map, Salt Lake County. Figure 16. USGS 2014 Earthquakes Hazard Map. Figure 17. Rio Tinto’s TRACK program. Figure 18. A Robotic Total Station (RTS). Figure 19. GroundProbe Slope Stability Radar (SSR). Figure 20. IBIS System. Figure 21. Uniaxial strength and alteration. Figure 22. Effect of water pressure on Mohr’s Circle. Figure 23. Drainage methods. Figure 24. Spatial variability of rock mass. 6 Figure 25. Discontinuities and scale. Figure 26. Plane failure diagram. Figure 27. Wedge failure diagram. Figure 28. Circular failure diagram. Figure 29. Toppling failure diagram. Figure 30. Buckling failure diagram. Figure 31. Mohr-Coulomb failure envelope. Figure 32. Typical kinematic analysis plots. Figure 33. Hoek and Bray (1981) slope height vs slope angle study. Figure 34. Inverse velocity plot. Figure 35. Inclined block. Figure 36. Inclined block with water pressure. Figure 37. Inclined block with rock bolt. Figure 38. Circular failure/ method of slices. Figure 39. Bingham Canyon Mine. Figure 40. 25 year copper price Figure 41. Slope geometry of open pit mine. Figure 42. Typical Slide plot. Figure 43. Slopes of failure surface in Slide. Figure 44. Water table in Slide. Figure 45. Quartzite Mohr-Coulomb plot. Figure 46. Argillic Clay Mohr-Coulomb plot. Figure 47. Preexisting discontinuity in quartzite, Slide. Figure 48. Water table in Slide. Figure 49. Factor of safety rankings. Figure 50. FoS plot, preexisting discontinuity in quartzite. 7 Figure 51. Average FoS by failure plane angle. Figure 52. FoS plot, failure plane in argillic clay. Figure 53. FoS plot, quartzite sliding on argillic clay. Figure 54. NOAA precipitation map, April 9, 2013. Figure 55. Side scarp diagram. Figure 56. Predicted vs actual run out. 8 List of Tables Table 1. Advanced limit equilibrium methods. Table 2. Quartzite strength properties, Styles et al. (2011) Table 3. Quartzite: 500 psi Normal Load. Table 4. Quartzite: 1000 psi Normal Load. Table 5. Quartzite: 1500 psi Normal Load. Table 6. Quartzite: 2000 psi Normal Load. Table 7. Quartzite: 2500 psi Normal Load. Table 8. Peak and residual values for quartzite. Table 9. Argillic Clay-Quartzite: 500 psi Normal Load. Table 10. Argillic Clay-Quartzite: 1000 psi Normal Load. Table 11. Argillic Clay-Quartzite: 1500 psi Normal Load. Table 12. Argillic Clay-Quartzite: 2000 psi Normal Load. Table 13. Argillic Clay-Quartzite: 2500 psi Normal Load. Table 14. Argillic Clay-Quartzite: 3000 psi Normal Load. Table 15. Failure Plane in Quartzite; Failure Plane: 15˚. DRY. Table 16. Argillic Clay Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 15˚. DRY. Table 17. Failure Plane in Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 15˚. DRY. Table 18. Altered Limestone Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 15˚. Table 19. Failure Plane in Altered Limestone; Failure Plane: 15˚. DRY. Table 20. Quartzite Sliding on Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 15˚. DRY. Table 21. Failure Plane in Quartzite; Failure Plane: 15˚. SAT. Table 22. Argillic Clay Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 15˚. SAT. Table 23. Failure Plane in Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 15˚. SAT. Table 24. Altered Limestone Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 15˚. 9 Table 25. Failure Plane in Altered Limestone; Failure Plane: 15˚. SAT. Table 26. Quartzite Sliding on Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 15˚. SAT. Table 27. Failure Plane in Quartzite; Failure Plane: 20˚. DRY. Table 28. Argillic Clay Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 20˚. DRY. Table 29. Failure Plane in Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 20˚. DRY. Table 30. Altered Limestone Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 20˚. Table 31. Failure Plane in Altered Limestone; Failure Plane: 20˚. DRY. Table 32. Quartzite Sliding on Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 20˚. DRY. Table 33. Failure Plane in Quartzite; Failure Plane: 20˚. SAT. Table 34. Argillic Clay Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 20˚. SAT. Table 35. Failure Plane in Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 20˚. SAT. Table 36. Altered Limestone Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 20˚. Table 37. Failure Plane in Altered Limestone; Failure Plane: 20˚. SAT. Table 38. Quartzite Sliding on Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 20˚. SAT. Table 39. Failure Plane in Quartzite; Failure Plane: 25˚. DRY. Table 40. Argillic Clay Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 25˚. DRY. Table 41. Failure Plane in Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 25˚. DRY. Table 42. Altered Limestone Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 25˚. Table 43. Failure Plane in Altered Limestone; Failure Plane: 25˚. DRY. Table 44. Quartzite Sliding on Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 25˚. DRY. Table 45. Failure Plane in Quartzite; Failure Plane: 25˚. SAT. Table 46. Argillic Clay Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 25˚. SAT. Table 47. Failure Plane in Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 25˚. SAT. Table 48. Altered Limestone Sliding on Quartzite; Failure Plane: 25˚. Table 49. Failure Plane in Altered Limestone; Failure Plane: 25˚. SAT. Table 50. Quartzite Sliding on Argillic Clay; Failure Plane: 25˚. SAT. 10 Introduction Bingham Canyon Mine is located 18 miles southwest of Salt Lake City, Utah, and is one of the largest open pit mines in the world. The pit is approximately 3,900 feet deep and is more than 2.75 miles across. Bingham Canyon Mine has produced more copper—about 19 million tons—than any other mine in the world, and also produces gold, silver, and molybdenum (Rio Tinto Kennecott, 2013a). On April 10, 2013, a major landslide occurred in the northeastern pit wall, moving material at an average speed of 70 mph and burying the pit floor in 300 feet of dirt and rock (Carter, 2014; Pankow and Moore, 2014). The Manefay Slide has been called the largest non- volcanic landslide in modern North American history, displacing more than 145 million tons of material. The Manefay Slide even caused two seismic events registering 2.5 and 2.4 in magnitude, as well as 14 smaller earthquakes (Pankow and Moore, 2014; Carter, 2014). Fortunately, no one was injured or died because of the landslide. The mine’s geotechnical operations team used the data collected from several slope monitoring instruments to administer a preemptive response, suspending mining activities and clearing all personnel from the open pit.
Recommended publications
  • Biofilm Adhesion on the Sulfide Mineral Bornite & Implications for Astrobiology
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 2019 BIOFILM ADHESION ON THE SULFIDE MINERAL BORNITE & IMPLICATIONS FOR ASTROBIOLOGY Margaret M. Wilson University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Wilson, Margaret M., "BIOFILM ADHESION ON THE SULFIDE MINERAL BORNITE & IMPLICATIONS FOR ASTROBIOLOGY" (2019). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 1517. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/1517 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BIOFILM ADHESION ON THE SULFIDE MINERAL BORNITE & IMPLICATIONS FOR ASTROBIOLOGY BY MARGARET M. WILSON A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIOLOGICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2019 MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIOLOGICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE THESIS OF MARGARET M. WILSON APPROVED: Thesis Committee: Major Professor Dawn Cardace José Amador Roxanne Beinart Nasser H. Zawia DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2019 ABSTRACT We present research observing and documenting the model organism, Pseudomonas fluorescens (P. fluorescens), building biofilm on a natural mineral substrate composed largely of bornite (Cu5FeS4), a copper-iron sulfide mineral, with closely intergrown regions of covellite (CuS) and chalcopyrite (CuFeS2). In examining biofilm establishment on sulfide minerals, we investigate a potential habitable niche for microorganisms in extraterrestrial sites. Geochemical microenvironments on Earth and in the lab can also serve as analogs for important extraterrestrial sites, such as sheltered, subsurface microenvironments on Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Nomenclature of ' Volcanic Rocks in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico
    -» Stratigraphic Nomenclature of ' Volcanic Rocks in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico By R. A. BAILEY, R. L. SMITH, and C. S. ROSS CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY » GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1274-P New Stratigraphic names and revisions in nomenclature of upper Tertiary and , Quaternary volcanic rocks in the Jemez Mountains UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1969 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 15 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract.._..._________-...______.._-.._._____.. PI Introduction. -_-________.._.____-_------___-_______------_-_---_-_ 1 General relations._____-___________--_--___-__--_-___-----___---__. 2 Keres Group..__________________--------_-___-_------------_------ 2 Canovas Canyon Rhyolite..__-__-_---_________---___-____-_--__ 5 Paliza Canyon Formation.___-_________-__-_-__-__-_-_______--- 6 Bearhead Rhyolite-___________________________________________ 8 Cochiti Formation.._______________________________________________ 8 Polvadera Group..______________-__-_------________--_-______---__ 10 Lobato Basalt______________________________________________ 10 Tschicoma Formation_______-__-_-____---_-__-______-______-- 11 El Rechuelos Rhyolite--_____---------_--------------_-_------- 11 Puye Formation_________________------___________-_--______-.__- 12 Tewa Group__._...._.______........___._.___.____......___...__ 12 Bandelier Tuff.______________.______________... 13 Tsankawi Pumice Bed._____________________________________ 14 Valles Rhyolite______.__-___---_____________.________..__ 15 Deer Canyon Member.______-_____-__.____--_--___-__-____ 15 Redondo Creek Member.__________________________________ 15 Valle Grande Member____-__-_--___-___--_-____-___-._-.__ 16 Battleship Rock Member...______________________________ 17 El Cajete Member____..._____________________ 17 Banco Bonito Member.___-_--_---_-_----_---_----._____--- 18 References .
    [Show full text]
  • MOLYBDENUM by Michael J
    MOLYBDENUM By Michael J. Magyar Domestic survey data and tables were prepared by Cindy C. Chen, statistical assistant, and the world production table was prepared by Linder Roberts, international data coordinator. Molybdenum is a refractory metallic element used principally until after the nearby Henderson deposit in Empire, CO, about as an alloying agent in cast iron, steel, and superalloys to 100 kilometers east, is exhausted. The Tonopah Mine in Nevada enhance hardenability, strength, toughness, and wear- and was being permanently closed. Molybdenum was produced as corrosion- resistance. To achieve desired metallurgical properties, a byproduct of copper production at the Bagdad and Sierrita molybdenum, primarily in the form of molybdic oxide (MoX) or Mines in Arizona and at the Bingham Canyon Mine in Utah. ferromolybdenum (FeMo), is frequently used in combination with The byproduct molybdenum recovery circuit at the Chino Mine or added to chromium, columbium (niobium), manganese, nickel, in New Mexico remained on care and maintenance. Montana tungsten, or other alloy metals. The versatility of molybdenum in Resources’ Continental Pit in Montana resumed operation enhancing a variety of alloy properties has ensured it a significant in November 2003, with the first shipments of molybdenite role in contemporary industrial technology, which increasingly concentrate expected in early 2004 (Platts Metals Week, 2003d). requires materials that are serviceable under high stress, expanded With byproduct molybdenum recovery at a copper mine, temperature ranges, and highly corrosive environments. Moreover, all mining costs associated with producing the molybdenum molybdenum finds significant use as a refractory metal in numerous concentrate are allocated to the primary metal (copper).
    [Show full text]
  • Leaching of Pure Chalcocite with Reject Brine and Mno2 from Manganese Nodules
    metals Article Leaching of Pure Chalcocite with Reject Brine and MnO2 from Manganese Nodules David Torres 1,2,3, Emilio Trigueros 1, Pedro Robles 4 , Williams H. Leiva 5, Ricardo I. Jeldres 5 , Pedro G. Toledo 6 and Norman Toro 1,2,3,* 1 Department of Mining and Civil Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 30203 Cartagena, Spain; [email protected] (D.T.); [email protected] (E.T.) 2 Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Universidad Arturo Prat, Almirante Juan José Latorre 2901, Antofagasta 1244260, Chile 3 Departamento de Ingeniería Metalúrgica y Minas, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile 4 Escuela de Ingeniería Química, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile; [email protected] 5 Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Procesos de Minerales, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1270300, Chile; [email protected] (W.H.L.); [email protected] (R.I.J.) 6 Department of Chemical Engineering and Laboratory of Surface Analysis (ASIF), Universidad de Concepción, P.O. Box 160-C, Correo 3, Concepción 4030000, Chile; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +56-552651021 Received: 21 September 2020; Accepted: 24 October 2020; Published: 27 October 2020 Abstract: Chalcocite (Cu2S) has the fastest kinetics of dissolution of Cu in chlorinated media of all copper sulfide minerals. Chalcocite has been identified as having economic interest due to its abundance, although the water necessary for its dissolution is scarce in many regions. In this work, the replacement of fresh water by sea water or by reject brine with high chloride content from desalination plants is analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Section of the Black Range at Kingston, New Mexico
    BULLETIN 33 Geologic Section of the Black Range at Kingston, New Mexico BY FREDERICK J. KUELLMER Structure and stratigraphy of the Black Range, detailed petrology of igneous rocks, and general guides to ore exploration 1954 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Eugene Callaghan, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS EX OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ..............................Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley ................................................ Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Robert W. Botts .............................................................................. Albuquerque Holm O. Bursum, Jr ................................................................................ Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ...............................................................................Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio .............................................................................Los Alamos A. A. Kemnitz ...........................................................................................Hobbs Contents Page ABSTRACT ......................................................... …………………………………… 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Tertiary Geology of the Southern Portion of the Eureka Quadrangle, Juab and Utah Counties, Utah
    TERTIARY GEOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE EUREKA QUADRANGLE, JUAB AND UTAH COUNTIES, UTAH by Jeffrey D. Keith and Choon-Sik Kim Department of Geology, University of Georgia UTAH GEOLOGICAL AND MINERAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OPEN-FILE REPORT l.99 SEPTEMBER 1990 THE PUBUCATION OF THIS PAPER IS MADE POSSmLE WITH MINERAL LEASE FUNDS A primary mission of the UGMS is to provide geologic information of Utab through publications; the Cormal publication series is reserved Cor material whose senior autbor is a UGMS stafT member. This Mineral Lease publication provides an outlet Cor non-UGMS authors without necessarily going tbrough extensive policy, technical, and editorial review required by the Cormal series. It also provides a means for non-UGMS authors to publish more interpretive work with the knowledge that readers will exercise some degree of caution. ABSTRACT The Tertiary rocks of the southern portion of the Eureka quadrangle were mapped in order to resolve several questions concerning the volcanic strati­ graphy and location of vents, calderas, and productive intrusions in the East Tintic Mountains. A vent related to the Latite Ridge Latite ash flow erup­ tions and biotite latite lava flows and lahars was found near Gold Bond Spring. The vent appears to be located along an east-west fault zone and caldera boundary. The caldera may be related to eruption of an older ash flow tuff, but not to the Packard Quartz Latite. No conclusive contacts were found to substantiate recent radiometric ages which indicate that the Packard Quartz Latite is not the oldest volcanic unit in the East Tintic Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Kennecott Utah Copper-Sustainable Over Time PHOTOS/VIDEO AUDIO
    1 UNIVERSITY OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF MINING ENGINEERING PRESENTATION to IMOA by Louie Cononelos “Kennecott Utah Copper-Sustainable Over Time PHOTOS/VIDEO AUDIO This is a story that had its beginning over 150 ago…and that story is still being written today. It began in Bingham Canyon, Utah located about 26 miles southwest of Salt Lake City, which was destined to become one of the greatest “mining camps” anywhere in the country. Mining in Utah, which was part of Spanish Mexico, can be traced back to Spanish miners in the mid-1700s. The start of mining in Utah, however, is credited to the United States Army in 1863. Troops under the command of Colonel Patrick Connor are credited with the discovery of Utah’s first mining claim and helping to form the first mining company and mining district in Bingham Canyon. The early mining at Bingham was underground with the exception of placer mining. 2 Bingham Canyon was a beehive of mining activity at the turn of the Century. Dozens of small companies dug tunnels and sank shafts in the mountains where they were mining lead, silver and gold ores…but not the low- grade copper ores that were in abundance and considered a nuisance. Then, along came Daniel C. Jackling, a 29-year-old metallurgical engineer, who with his partner, a mining engineer named Robert Gemmell, studied and assayed ore samples from the operations that dotted the canyon. They determined that there were vast tonnages of low- grade copper ore in the main mountain that divided the canyon…it was the kind of ore the mining companies tried to avoid because it interfered with the recovery of the metals they were mining.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Copper on Fish and Aquatic Resources
    Effects of Copper on Fish and Aquatic Resources Prepared for By Dr. Carol Ann Woody & Sarah Louise O’Neal Fisheries Research and Consulting Anchorage, Alaska June 2012 Effects of Copper on Fish and Aquatic Resources Introduction The Nushagak and Kvichak river watersheds in Bristol Bay Alaska (Figure 1) together produced over 650 million sockeye salmon during 1956-2011, about 40% of Bristol Bay production (ADFG 2012). Proposed mining of copper–sulfide ore in these watersheds will expose rocks with elevated metal concentrations including copper (Cu) (Figure 1; Cox 1996, NDM 2005a, Ghaffari et al. 2011). Because mining can increase metal concentrations in water by several orders of magnitude compared to uncontaminated sites (ATSDR 1990, USEPA 2000, Younger 2002), and because Cu can be highly toxic to aquatic life (Eisler 2000), this review focuses on risks to aquatic life from potential increased Cu inputs from proposed development. Figure 1. Map showing current mining claims (red) in Nushagak and Kvichak river watersheds as of 2011. Proven low- grade copper sulfide deposits are located in large lease block along Iliamna Lake. Documented salmon streams are outlined in dark blue. Note many regional streams have never been surveyed for salmon presence or absence. Sources: fish data from: www.adfg.alaska.gov/sf/SARR/AWC/index.cfm?ADFG =main.home mine data from Alaska Department of Natural Resources - http://www.asgdc.state.ak.us/ Core samples collected from Cu prospects near Iliamna Lake (Figure 1) show high potential for acid generation due to iron sulfides in the rock (NDM 2005a). When sulfides are exposed to oxygen and water sulfuric acid forms, which can dissolve metals in rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Lined Piping List.Xlsx
    3516 East 13th Ave Hibbing, MN 55746 Suite 700, 407-2nd St SW Calgary, AB T2P 2Y3 www.iracore.com 218-262-5211 Partial Listing of Rubber Lined Piping Systems Installed Customers Pipe Diameter Inches Product Transport Lengths Linear Feet LTV Steel 14” Taconite/Tailings 40’ 155,160 Cleveland Cliffs 24” and 26” Taconite/Tailings 20’ to 40’ 58,310 Iron Ore Co. of Canada 20’ Taconite/Tailings 38’ 56,824 Eveleth Mine 16” and 18” Taconite/Tailings 40’ 35,000 National Steel 22” Taconite/Tailings 40’ 51,040 Homestake Gold Mine 4”, 5”, 6” Gold 10’, 20’, 40’ 45,000 MN Power and Light 12” and 18” Power Generation Various 12,000 Wabush Mines Canada 3” to 18” Taconite/Tailings Various 5,000 Unimin 10” Aggragate 40’ 10,000 US Steel 4” to 12” Taconite/Tailings Various 75,000 Cheme (for MN Power) 6” to 30” Power Generation Various 20’ 25,000 SMARCO 20” Iron Ore Various 10,000 Butler Tac 14” Taconite/Tailings Various 100,000 Misc. Power Plants 3” to 30” Power Generation Various 200,000 Chino Mines 12” to 22” Copper/Tailings Various 10,000 Azco 3” to 30” Gold / Copper Various 25,000 Allegheny Power 4” to 36” Power Generation Various 25,000 Harrison Station, WV Kennecott Utah Copper 12”, 28”, 38”, 54”, 60”, 66” Copper/Tailings 60’ 175,000 BHP Nevada Mining 30” Gold / Copper 50’, 60’ 7,850 NY State Electric & Gas 6” and 8” Power Generation Various 1,000 Corporation BATU HIJAU 3” to 44” Gold/Tailings 1” to 60’ 23,970 Newmont Gold ROYAL OAK MINES 24” to 36” Copper/Tailings 40’, 60’ 60,000 Kemess Site Duro Felguera 3" to 30" Iron Ore Various 20,000 Venezuela FMI Bagdad 34" Copper 40’ 8,000 Arizona Hibbing Taconite 16" and 18" Taconite/Tailings 40' , 50' 35,000 Minnesota Suncor 8" Gypsum Slurry 20' , 40’ 12,000 Alberta, Canada Note: The above listed major jobs also included fittings, elbows, etc., which are not included in total linear feet lined.
    [Show full text]
  • Kennecott and Utah's Air Quality
    Utah October 2018 kennecott.com/air-quality Kennecott and Utah’s air quality A closer look at winter inversion Wasatch Front Utah continues to have wintertime air quality problems During the winter, Kennecott shuts down its power despite decades of air quality regulations on companies plant reducing the amount of fine particulate emissions like Rio Tinto’s Kennecott Utah Copper. Utah meets the to 3.8 percent of a typical winter day. Additionally, EPA’s annual standard for fine particulate emissions (PM2.5) Kennecott has been actively working to decrease throughout the year. However, the state struggles to meet emissions from the other sources that contribute to the 24-hour standard during the winter inversion season, inversions, such as transportation and area sources. on average about 20-days per year. Though it will take the entire community working According to the Utah Division of Air Quality, Kennecott together to be successful, Kennecott is committed is responsible for 4.4 percent of the annual fine particulate to doing its part. emissions in the Salt Lake air shed. Kennecott’s impact on the valley’s air, especially during an inversion is To learn more, take a closer look at even less. kennecott.com/air-quality. From ore to more: our work makes modern life possible. Cu October 2018 kennecott.com/air-quality Kennecott Utah Copper Kennecott’s contribution to Utah’s air quality 6390 ft. 6390 aboveft. sea6390 level ft. above sea level above sea level Bingham Canyon Mine 6390Bingham ft. CanyonBingham Mine Canyon Mine 5550above sea f levelt. elevation 5550elevation aboveft.
    [Show full text]
  • Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation
    Miningmining BestPractices Plant-Wide Assessment Case Study Industrial Technologies Program Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation: Facility Utilizes Energy Assessments to Identify $930,000 in Potential Annual Savings BENEFITS • Identified potential annual cost savings of $930,000 Summary • Identified potential annual savings of Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation (KUCC) used targeted energy assessments in the smelter 452,000 MMBtu in natural gas and refinery at its Bingham Canyon Mine, near Salt Lake City, Utah, to identify projects to • Found opportunities to reduce maintenance, conserve energy and improve production processes. By implementing the projects identified repair costs, waste, and environmental during the assessment, KUCC could realize annual cost savings of $930,000 and annual energy emissions savings of 452,000 million British thermal units (MMBtu). The copper smelting and refining • Found opportunities to improve industrial facilities were selected for the energy assessments because of their energy-intensive processes. Implementing the projects identified in the assessments would also reduce maintenance, hygiene and safety repair costs, waste, and environmental emissions. One project would use methane gas from • Identified ways to improve process an adjacent municipal dump to replace natural gas used to heat the refinery electrolyte. throughput Public-Private Partnership • Identified a potential payback period of less than 1 year for all projects combined The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Industrial Technologies Program (ITP) cosponsored the assessment. DOE promotes plant-wide energy-efficiency assessments that will lead to improvements in industrial energy efficiency, productivity, and global competitiveness, while reducing waste and environmental emissions. In this case, DOE contributed $100,000 of the total $225,000 assessment cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment-Hosted Copper Deposits of the World: Deposit Models and Database
    Sediment-Hosted Copper Deposits of the World: Deposit Models and Database By Dennis P. Cox1, David A. Lindsey2 Donald A. Singer1, Barry C. Moring1, and Michael F. Diggles1 Including: Descriptive Model of Sediment-Hosted Cu 30b.1 by Dennis P. Cox1 Grade and Tonnage Model of Sediment-Hosted Cu by Dennis P. Cox1 and Donald A. Singer1 Descriptive Model of Reduced-Facies Cu 30b.2 By Dennis P. Cox1 Grade and Tonnage Model of Reduced Facies Cu by Dennis P. Cox1 and Donald A. Singer1 Descriptive Model of Redbed Cu 30b.3, by David A. Lindsey2 and Dennis P. Cox1 Grade and Tonnage Model of Redbed Cu by Dennis P. Cox1 and Donald A. Singer1 Descriptive Model of Revett Cu 30b.4, by Dennis P. Cox1 Grade and Tonnage Model of Revett Cu by Dennis P. Cox1 and Donald A. Singer1 Open-File Report 03-107 Version 1.3 2003, revised 2007 Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-107/ Any use of trade, product or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 2 Box 25046, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Introduction This publication contains four descriptive models and four grade-tonnage models for sediment hosted copper deposits. Descriptive models are useful in exploration planning and resource assessment because they enable the user to identify deposits in the field and to identify areas on geologic and geophysical maps where deposits could occur.
    [Show full text]