DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Section of the Black Range at Kingston, New Mexico

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geologic Section of the Black Range at Kingston, New Mexico BULLETIN 33 Geologic Section of the Black Range at Kingston, New Mexico BY FREDERICK J. KUELLMER Structure and stratigraphy of the Black Range, detailed petrology of igneous rocks, and general guides to ore exploration 1954 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Eugene Callaghan, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS EX OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ..............................Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley ................................................ Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Robert W. Botts .............................................................................. Albuquerque Holm O. Bursum, Jr ................................................................................ Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ...............................................................................Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio .............................................................................Los Alamos A. A. Kemnitz ...........................................................................................Hobbs Contents Page ABSTRACT ......................................................... …………………………………… 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................4 PRECAMBRIAN SEQUENCE ....................................................................................6 Introduction ...................................................................................................................6 Graywacke ....................................................................................................................6 Granite ..........................................................................................................................7 Metadiabase ..................................................................................................................8 PALEOZOIC, STRATIGRAPHY ..............................................................................11 Introduction .................................................................................................................11 Cambrian (?) system ...................................................................................................11 Ordovician system .......................................................................................................12 El Paso limestone ...................................................................................................12 Montoya limestone .................................................................................................15 Silurian system ............................................................................................................18 Devonian system .........................................................................................................19 Mississippian system ...................................................................................................20 Pennsylvanian system ..................................................................................................22 Permian system ...........................................................................................................24 Summary of the Paleozoic strata .................................................................................27 TERTIARY SEQUENCE ...........................................................................................29 Introduction .................................................................................................................29 Andesite, latite, and their quartzose equivalents .........................................................30 Quartz monzonite porphyry .........................................................................................35 Contact metamorphism and mineralization ................................................................41 Rhyolitic igneous rocks ...............................................................................................42 Tuffaceous rhyolite .................................................................................................42 Rhyolite porphyry ...................................................................................................50 Small rhyolitic intrusive masses..............................................................................51 Xenolith zones ................................................. …………………………………...60 Endomorphic effects of xenoliths in volcanic glass ................................................67 Rabb Canyon pegmatite area ..................................................................................79 Summary of the rhyolitic igneous rocks .................................................................81 Page Sandstone, conglomerate, and tuff ............................................................................... 81 Late andesite ................................................................................................................ 82 Early gravel deposits ................................................................................................... 84 SUMMARY OF QUATERNARY DEPOSITS AND LANDFORMS .............................................................................................. 86 MAJOR STRUCTURAL FEATURES ........................................................................ 87 ORE DEPOSITS .......................................................................................................... 90 Illustrations TABLES Table 1. Estimated modes of the Precambrian plutonic rocks........................................7 Table 2. Classification of the Paleozoic strata in the Kingston area ........................... 28 Table 3. Minerals of the quartz monzonite porphyry ................................................... 39 Table 4. Optical properties of feldspars of the quartz monzonite 40 Table 5. Average modes of the rhyolitic rocks ............................................................. 46 Table 6. Analyses, norms, and modes of igneous rocks of the Kingston area .............. 63 Table 7. Size measurements on xenoliths and crystalline rims .................................... 71 Table 8. Compositional differences between the vitrophyre, rim, xenolith, and "normal" quartz latite .................................................................................. 72 Table 9. Direction and relative magnitude of the compositional differences between the rim and its surroundings, and the xenolith and "normal" quartz latite ....................................................... 73 Table 10. Soda-potash content of the matrices of the rhyolite vitrophyre and the crystalline rim .............................................................................................. 74 Table 11. X-ray data on the sanidine phenocrysts and the matrix in the crystalline rim .................................................................................... 75 Table 12. Feldspars of the Rabb Canyon pegmatite area ............................................ 80 Table 13. Modes of the late andesite volcanic unit ...................................................... 83 iv Page FIGURES Figure 1. Generalized rock section of the Black Range at Kingston ...............................5 Figure 2. Bent plagioclase in Precambrian granite ........................................................9 Figure 3. Shredded hornblende in Precambrian metadiabase ........................................9 Figure 4. Stratigraphic Section I ...................................................................................13 Figure 5. Stratigraphic Section II ..................................................................................14 Figure 6. Stratigraphic Section III ................................................................................17 Figure 7. Stratigraphic Section IV ................................................................................21 Figure 8. Stratigraphic Section V .. .. ..........................................................................25 Figure 9. Interbedded flows and tuffs of the early andesite ...........................................31 Figure 10. Plagioclase phenocrysts in the quartz monzonite porphyry .........................38 Figure 11. Plumose and normal texture of tuffaceous rhyolite ......................................45 Figure 12. Phenocrysts of tuffaceous rhyolite ...............................................................45 Figure 13. Clear and clouded sanidine phenocrysts in tuffaceous rhyolite ...................47 Figure 14. Xenomorphic-granular phase of rhyolite porphyry .....................................52 Figure 15. Perthite, quartz, and spherulitic plagioclase in rhyolite sill………………… 52 Figure 16. Green vitrophyre dike in andesite ................................................................54 Figure 17. Green vitrophyre enclosed by rhyolite rim in andesite.................................55 Figure 18. Granophyric and quartz phenocrysts in green vitrophyre ...........................56 Figure 19. Phenocryst aggregate in glass matrix ..........................................................56 Figure 20. Granophyric intergrowth
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hypersthene Syenite and Related Rocks of the Blue Ridge Region, Virginia1
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA V o l. 27, pp. 193-234 June 1, 1916 HYPERSTHENE SYENITE AND RELATED ROCKS OF THE BLUE RIDGE REGION, VIRGINIA1 BY THOMAS L. WATSON AND JUSTUS H. CLINE (Presented before the Society December 29, 191k) CONTENTS Page Introduction.................................................................................................................. 194 Previous geologic work............................................................................................. 196 Quartz-bearing hypersthene-andesine syenite...................................................... 197 Distribution.......................................................................................................... 197 Megascopic character......................................................................................... 198 Microscopic character........................................................................................ 199 Chemical composition and classification...................................................... 202 Comparison with quartz monzonite.............................................................. 204 Origin and application of name............................................................. 204 Chemical composition................................................................................ 205 Comparison with akerite.................................................................................. 206 Comparison with syenite (andesine anorthosite) of Nelson County, Virginia.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry of the Catheart Mountain Porphyry Copper Deposit, Maine
    Maine Geological S urvey Studies in Maine Geology: Volume 4 1989 Geochemistry of the Catheart Mountain Porphyry Copper Deposit, Maine Robert A. Ayuso U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia 22092 ABSTRACT The Ordovician Catheart Mountain pluton is the best example ofa porphyry copper system in the New England Appalachians. It intrudes the Ordovician Attean quartz monzonite in the Proterozoic Chain Lakes massif. The pluton consists of equigranular granodiorite intruded by porphyritic dikes of granite and granodiorite which contain up to 4% sulfides (pyrite, chalcopyrite, and molybdenite). The equigranular host rocks and the porphyritic dikes are generally chemically similar, showing scattered compositional variations which reflect changes imposed on the pluton during crystallization and hydrothermal alteration. Most rocks are hydrated, containing high C02 and high S. The most intensely altered parts of the pluton are potassic (up to 6.9 wt % KiO) and highly mineralized, especially with Cu (up to 3900 ppm), but also with Mo (up to 320 ppm). The host granodiorite and porphyritic dikes are depleted in Ca, Na, Fe2+ and Sr as a function of increasing Cu; the sulfide-rich rocks are enriched in Rb and they have high Fe3+/Fe2+, K/Na, and Rb/Sr values. Abundances and ratios of the highly-charged cations (e.g. Zr, Hf, Ta, and Th) in the Catheart Mountain pluton resemble those in the Devonian granodiorites in the northern Maine plutonic belt. Abundances and ratios of the highly-charged cations in the Sally Mountain pluton, a nearby body also containing Cu and Mo mineralization, differ significantly from those in the Catheart Mountain pluton suggesting that the two plutons are not comagmatic.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Nomenclature of ' Volcanic Rocks in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico
    -» Stratigraphic Nomenclature of ' Volcanic Rocks in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico By R. A. BAILEY, R. L. SMITH, and C. S. ROSS CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY » GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1274-P New Stratigraphic names and revisions in nomenclature of upper Tertiary and , Quaternary volcanic rocks in the Jemez Mountains UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1969 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 15 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract.._..._________-...______.._-.._._____.. PI Introduction. -_-________.._.____-_------___-_______------_-_---_-_ 1 General relations._____-___________--_--___-__--_-___-----___---__. 2 Keres Group..__________________--------_-___-_------------_------ 2 Canovas Canyon Rhyolite..__-__-_---_________---___-____-_--__ 5 Paliza Canyon Formation.___-_________-__-_-__-__-_-_______--- 6 Bearhead Rhyolite-___________________________________________ 8 Cochiti Formation.._______________________________________________ 8 Polvadera Group..______________-__-_------________--_-______---__ 10 Lobato Basalt______________________________________________ 10 Tschicoma Formation_______-__-_-____---_-__-______-______-- 11 El Rechuelos Rhyolite--_____---------_--------------_-_------- 11 Puye Formation_________________------___________-_--______-.__- 12 Tewa Group__._...._.______........___._.___.____......___...__ 12 Bandelier Tuff.______________.______________... 13 Tsankawi Pumice Bed._____________________________________ 14 Valles Rhyolite______.__-___---_____________.________..__ 15 Deer Canyon Member.______-_____-__.____--_--___-__-____ 15 Redondo Creek Member.__________________________________ 15 Valle Grande Member____-__-_--___-___--_-____-___-._-.__ 16 Battleship Rock Member...______________________________ 17 El Cajete Member____..._____________________ 17 Banco Bonito Member.___-_--_---_-_----_---_----._____--- 18 References .
    [Show full text]
  • Tertiary Geology of the Southern Portion of the Eureka Quadrangle, Juab and Utah Counties, Utah
    TERTIARY GEOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE EUREKA QUADRANGLE, JUAB AND UTAH COUNTIES, UTAH by Jeffrey D. Keith and Choon-Sik Kim Department of Geology, University of Georgia UTAH GEOLOGICAL AND MINERAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OPEN-FILE REPORT l.99 SEPTEMBER 1990 THE PUBUCATION OF THIS PAPER IS MADE POSSmLE WITH MINERAL LEASE FUNDS A primary mission of the UGMS is to provide geologic information of Utab through publications; the Cormal publication series is reserved Cor material whose senior autbor is a UGMS stafT member. This Mineral Lease publication provides an outlet Cor non-UGMS authors without necessarily going tbrough extensive policy, technical, and editorial review required by the Cormal series. It also provides a means for non-UGMS authors to publish more interpretive work with the knowledge that readers will exercise some degree of caution. ABSTRACT The Tertiary rocks of the southern portion of the Eureka quadrangle were mapped in order to resolve several questions concerning the volcanic strati­ graphy and location of vents, calderas, and productive intrusions in the East Tintic Mountains. A vent related to the Latite Ridge Latite ash flow erup­ tions and biotite latite lava flows and lahars was found near Gold Bond Spring. The vent appears to be located along an east-west fault zone and caldera boundary. The caldera may be related to eruption of an older ash flow tuff, but not to the Packard Quartz Latite. No conclusive contacts were found to substantiate recent radiometric ages which indicate that the Packard Quartz Latite is not the oldest volcanic unit in the East Tintic Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation Rules for Lithology Merge Information Entry
    State of Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Vicki S. McConnell, State Geologist OREGON GEOLOGIC DIGITAL COMPILATION RULES FOR LITHOLOGY MERGE INFORMATION ENTRY G E O L O G Y F A N O D T N M I E N M E T R R A A L P I E N D D U N S O T G R E I R E S O 1937 2006 Revisions: Feburary 2, 2005 January 1, 2006 NOTICE The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries is publishing this paper because the infor- mation furthers the mission of the Department. To facilitate timely distribution of the information, this report is published as received from the authors and has not been edited to our usual standards. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation Published in conformance with ORS 516.030 For copies of this publication or other information about Oregon’s geology and natural resources, contact: Nature of the Northwest Information Center 800 NE Oregon Street #5 Portland, Oregon 97232 (971) 673-1555 http://www.naturenw.org Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries - Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation i RULES FOR LITHOLOGY MERGE INFORMATION ENTRY The lithology merge unit contains 5 parts, separated by periods: Major characteristic.Lithology.Layering.Crystals/Grains.Engineering Lithology Merge Unit label (Lith_Mrg_U field in GIS polygon file): major_characteristic.LITHOLOGY.Layering.Crystals/Grains.Engineering major characteristic - lower case, places the unit into a general category .LITHOLOGY - in upper case, generally the compositional/common chemical lithologic name(s)
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Physical Controls for Base Met Al Deposition in the Cascade Range of Washington
    State of Washington Department of Natural Resources BERT L. COLE, Commissioner of Public Lands DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Bulletin No. 58 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL CONTROLS FOR BASE MET AL DEPOSITION IN THE CASCADE RANGE OF WASHINGTON By ALAN ROBERT GRANT STATE PRINTING PLANT ~ OLYMPIA, WASHINCTON 1969 For safe by Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. Price $1.50 Errata sheet for Washington Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 58, Chemical and Physical Controls for Base Metal Deeosition in the Cascade Range of Washington ( By Alan Robert Grant Errors noted in the p-inted text are listed below. The editors regret these and possibly other mistakes in editing. Page 12 Paragraph 5, line 2, "heliocpter" should read helicopter. 14 Paragraph 6, line 6, •programed" should read programmed. 15 Figure 2, 11 Ntesoic" in explanation should read Mesozoic. 19 Paragraph 4, line 7, "authochthonous" should read autochthonous. 22 Paragraph 6, line 4, "extension Ntesozoic 11 should read exten•ioo.o f 1l1e Mesozoic. 22 Paragraph 7, line 1, ''aforemention" should read aforementioned. 25 Paragraph 4, line 7, "Misch" should be changed to Vance. 25 Paragraph 7, line 7, "Totoosh, pluton" should read Totoosh pluton. 26 Paragraph 1, line 4, "classical" should read classic. 32 Paragraph 4, line 1, "alkaline" should be changed to acidic intrusive. 33 Paragraph 1, line 1, "alkaline" should be changed to acidic intrusive. 48 Une 3 of Figure 16 caption, "alkaline" should be changed to acidic intrusive~ 49 Paragraph 3, line 5, "Creasy" should read Creasey. 51 Paragraph 3, line 1, "Creasy II should read Creasey.
    [Show full text]
  • 34. the K-Replacement Origin of the Megacrystal Lower Caribou Creek Granodiorite and the Goat Canyon-Halifax Creeks Quartz Monzo
    1 ISSN 1526-5757 34. The K-replacement origin of the megacrystal Lower Caribou Creek granodiorite and the Goat Canyon-Halifax Creeks quartz monzonite --- modifications of a former tonalite and diorite stock, British Columbia, Canada Lorence G. Collins email: [email protected] February 8, 1999 Introduction About 25 km south of Nakusp and 1 km east of Burton, British Columbia, Canada, is a stock whose western half is the Lower Caribou Creek megacrystal granodiorite and whose eastern half is the Goat Canyon-Halifax Creeks fine- grained quartz monzonite (Fig. 1); Hyndman, 1968). Biotite-hornblende tonalite and diorite are additional facies that occur along the border of the stock. Zoned plagioclase in all these rocks indicates a shallow intrusion and relatively rapid crystallization. This stock was called to my attention by Donald Hyndman because the K-feldspar megacrysts in the granodiorite appeared to be orthoclase whereas the smaller K-feldspar crystals in the fine-grained quartz monzonite were microcline. Subsequently, he loaned me 19 thin sections from his Ph.D thesis study (Hyndman, 1968), and these sections provided a broad representation of the textural and compositional variations in both rock types. Because he indicated that the two granitic facies were gradational to each other, this stock offered an opportunity to study the field and textural relationships across the transitions between the rocks having the two kinds of K-feldspar. Following his loan of thin sections, I visited the area and obtained 44 additional samples (and thin sections) across transitions between the two rock types. Examinations of field relationships and both his and my thin sections provide the basis for the conclusions presented in this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Governs the Making of Photocopies Or Other Reproductions of Copyrighted Materials
    Warning Concerning Copyright Restrictions The Copyright Law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research. If electronic transmission of reserve material is used for purposes in excess of what constitutes "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. (Photo: Kennecott) Bingham Canyon Landslide: Analysis and Mitigation GE 487: Geological Engineering Design Spring 2015 Jake Ward 1 Honors Undergraduate Thesis Signatures: 2 Abstract On April 10, 2013, a major landslide happened at Bingham Canyon Mine near Salt Lake City, Utah. The Manefay Slide has been called the largest non-volcanic landslide in modern North American history, as it is estimated it displaced more than 145 million tons of material. No injuries or loss of life were recorded during the incident; however, the loss of valuable operating time has a number of slope stability experts wondering how to prevent future large-scale slope failure in open pit mines. This comprehensive study concerns the analysis of the landslide at Bingham Canyon Mine and the mitigation of future, large- scale slope failures. The Manefay Slide was modeled into a two- dimensional, limit equilibrium analysis program to find the controlling factors behind the slope failure. It was determined the Manefay Slide was a result of movement along a saturated, bedding plane with centralized argillic alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of Map Units
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE LATIR VOLCANIC FIELD AND ADJACENT AREAS, NORTHERN NEW MEXICO By Peter W. Lipman and John C. Reed, Jr. 1989 DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS [Ages for Tertiary igneous rocks are based on potassium-argon (K-Ar) and fission-track (F-T) determinations by H. H. Mehnert and C. W. Naeser (Lipman and others, 1986), except where otherwise noted. Dates on Proterozoic igneous rocks are uranium-lead (U-Pb) determinations on zircon by S. A. Bowring (Bowring and others, 1984, and oral commun., 1985). Volcanic and plutonic rock names are in accord with the IUGS classification system, except that a few volcanic names (such as quartz latite) are used as defined by Lipman (1975) following historic regional usage. The Tertiary igneous rocks, other than the peralkaline rhyolites associated with the Questa caldera, constitute a high-K subalkaline suite similar to those of other Tertiary volcanic fields in the southern Rocky Mountains, but the modifiers called for by some classification schemes have been dropped for brevity: thus, a unit is called andesite, rather than alkali andesite or high-K andesite. Because many units were mapped on the basis of compositional affinities, map symbols were selected to emphasize composition more than geographic identifier: thus, all andesite symbols start with Ta; all quartz latites with Tq, and so forth.] SURFICIAL DEPOSITS ds Mine dumps (Holocene)—In and adjacent to the inactive open pit operation of Union Molycorp. Consist of angular blocks and finer debris, mainly from the Sulphur Gulch pluton Qal Alluvium (Holocene)—Silt, sand, gravel, and peaty material in valley bottoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Porphyry Copper Mineralisation of Western Usa
    The Ishihara Symposium: Granites and Associated Metallogenesis PORPHYRY COPPER MINERALISATION OF WESTERN USA Allan J.R.White VIEPS, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia Porphyry copper deposits of western USA are very large low grade deposits dominated by disseminated Cu mineralisation but commonly with appreciable Mo and Au. Many deposits began as gold camps. Mineralisation is centred on, and mostly within, near surface quartz monzonite intrusions in which there is inner and deeper concentric Mo-rich shells. Mo shells are followed by Cu-rich shells, then pyrite and there may be an outermost Pb-Zn-Ag zone as in the country rock skarns of the Bingham deposit (John 1978). Cu-Mo mineralisation occurs within a “potassic” alteration zone characterised by secondary biotite (e.g. Moore 1978). Extensive outer sericitic (phyllic), argillic and propylitic alteration zones do not necessarily conform to the concentric pattern. Large scale bulk mining of a porphyry deposit was first carried out at Bingham. There is a belt of economic deposits extending from Butte Montana, through Bingham Utah, to Arizona where deposits are most abundant, and New Mexico. This review is based on visits to many deposits along the whole length of the belt and various petrological observations at Butte, Bingham, Bagdad, Miami-Globe and Sierrita. Most deposits are Laramide (approx. 70 Ma), a notable exception being Bingham (40 Ma). The Laramide belt is inboard up to 1200 km from the Pacific coast of the US where there are Recent to Mesozoic subduction related rocks. It is suggested that the Laramide igneous rocks were not formed as a result of subduction but as a result of rifting within the Precambrian basement.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Alteration at Northparkes Mines, NSW, Australia
    The Anatomy of an Alkalic Porphyry Cu-Au System: Geology and Alteration at Northparkes Mines, NSW, Australia Adam Pacey1,2,*, Jamie J. Wilkinson2,1, Jeneta Owens3, Darren Priest3, David R. Cooke4,5 and Ian L. Millar6 1Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom 2Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom 3NorthparKes Mines, PO Box 995, ParKes, New South Wales, 2870, Australia 4Centre for Ore Deposit and Earth Sciences (CODES), University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia 5Transforming the Mining Value Chain (TMVC), an Australia Research Council (ARC) Industrial Transformation Research Hub, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia 6NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom *Corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords Northparkes, Macquarie Arc, porphyry deposit, propylitic alteration, potassic alteration, hydrothermal alteration, copper, gold Abstract The Late Ordovician-Early Silurian (~455-435 Ma) Northparkes system is a group of silica-saturated, alkalic porphyry deposits and prospects which developed within the Macquarie Island Arc. The system is host to a spectacular and diverse range of rocks and alteration-mineralization textures that facilitate a detailed understanding of its evolution, in particular into the nature and controls of porphyry-related propylitic alteration. The first intrusive phase at Northparkes is a pre- to early-mineralization pluton that underlies all the deposits and varies in composition from a biotite quartz monzonite (BQM) to alkali feldspar granite (AFG). Prior to total crystallization, this pluton was intruded by a more primitive quartz monzonite (QMZ) that marks the onset of a fertile fractionation series.
    [Show full text]
  • Age Determinations of Tee Rocks of the Batholiths of Baja Amd Southern
    Ao. AGE DETERMINATIONS OF TEE ROCKS OF THE BATHOLITHS OF BAJA AMD SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, SIERRA NEVADA, IDAHO, AND THE COAST RANGE OF WASHINGTON, BRITISH COLUMBIA, AND ALASKA* By Eo S, Larsen, Jr., David Gottfried, H. W. Jaffe, and C. L. Waring Augast 1957 Trace Elements Investigations Report 695 GEOLOGIC^ _ '•$.-'- DENVER *U$ This preliminary report is distributed •without editorial and technical review for conformity with official standards and nomenclature. It is not for public inspection or *This report concerns work done on "behalf of the Division of Research of the U« S. Atomic Energy Commission. USGS - TEI-695 GEOLOGY mD MINERALOGY Distribution If6. of copies Division of Ifew Materials, Albuquerque 0 <>*«,»,,«.**.««*»»»»*„*.**» 1 DiTision of Raw Materials, Austin .«...»«»...*»*.<,..«.***»*»...*. 1 Division of Raw Materials, Casper *»»,.*»«*.*. 0 ....„,,..«,......... 1 Division of Raw Materials, Denver ».».«,«»»««*.«.................. 1 Division of Raw Materials, Rapid City ..».„...».......*»....,.,.. 1 Division of Raw Materials, Salt Lake City ... , 0 .. o........ e ...... 1 Division of Raw Materials, Spokane .*.. 0 .*..».»*.*».*•»...*»»**.* 1 Division of Raw Materials, Washington ..,.. ..„,„<>. 0 .............. 5 Division of Research, Washington ......<,„..„*.„.„.,.<>,........... 1 Exploration Division, Grand Junction Operations Office .......... 1 Grand Junction Operations Office ......o......... a............... 1 Technical Information Service Extension, Oak Ridge 88 »........... 6 U» S» Geological Survey? Foreign Geology Branch,
    [Show full text]