Hypersthene Syenite and Related Rocks of the Blue Ridge Region, Virginia1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA

V o l. 27, pp. 193-234 June 1, 1916

HYPERSTHENE SYENITE AND RELATED ROCKS OF THE
BLUE RIDGE REGION, VIRGINIA1

BY THOMAS L. WATSON AND JUSTUS H. CLINE

(Presented before the Society December 29, 191k)

CONTENTS

Page

Introduction.................................................................................................................. 194

Previous geologic work............................................................................................. 196 Quartz-bearing hypersthene-andesine syenite...................................................... 197
Distribution.......................................................................................................... 197 Megascopic character......................................................................................... 198 Microscopic character........................................................................................ 199 Chemical composition and classification...................................................... 202 Comparison with quartz monzonite.............................................................. 204
Origin and application of name............................................................. 204 Chemical composition................................................................................ 205
Comparison with akerite.................................................................................. 206 Comparison with syenite (andesine anorthosite) of Nelson County, Virginia.............................................................................................................. 209 Comparison with pyroxene syenite of the Adirondack«.......................... 212 Comparison with charnockite.......................................................................... 218
Unakite type................................................................................................................ 220
Origin of name.................................................................................................... 220 Distribution and characteristics of unakite.............................................. 220 Origin of the unakite........................................................................................ 222 Zirconiferous epidosite...................................................................................... 223
Granite........................................................................................................................... 223 Norite............................................................................................................................. 225
General discussion of characteristics and distribution..................... ..... 225

Megascopic character......................................................................................... 226 Microscopic character........................................................................................ 227 Ilmenite-apatite gabbro..................................................................................... 228 Chemical composition and classification...................................................... 229
Pyroxenite..................................................................................................................... 231
Distribution......................................:.................................................................. 231 Microscopic character........................................................................................ 231 Chemical composition and classification...................................................... 232
Age relations................................................................................................................ 233

1Manuscript received by the Secretary of the Society December 6, 1915.

XV—Bu l l . Ge o l . So c . Am., Vo l . 27, 1915

(193)

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/27/1/193/3413539/BUL27-0193.pdf by guest

194 WATSON AND CLINE---- ROCKS OF THE BLUE RIDGE REGION

I n t r o d u c t i o n

The Blue Ridge, which forms the extreme eastern member of the Appalachian Mountains, constitutes one of the principal topographic divisions of the Appalachian ranges. In Virginia the Blue Eidge Mountains form a fairly continuous and well defined ridge extending from Harpers Ferry southwestward entirely across the State. At Harpers Ferry the Blue Eidge Mountains are narrow, and in elevation are less than 1,000 feet above sealevel; but southwestward through Virginia the ridge becomes broader and higher, and attains its greatest width in North Carolina. Heights of more than 4,000 feet above the sea are reached at several points in Virginia.
The Blue Eidge is composed of a central core of igneous rocks, flanked on the northwest side by the folded sedimentary series of Cambro-Ordovician rocks of the Great Valley province. The basal member of this series is a quartzite (Weverton), which extends for much of the distance as a range of hills along the west flank of the main ridge at an altitude equal in some cases to that of the Blue Eidge. Eemnants of the Cambrian series of sediments are also preserved in places along the southeast slope of the Blue Eidge and at several points in the vicinity of James Eiver Gap. The sediments are arched in anticlinal fashion entirely over the ridge, completely concealing for short distances the central core of igneous rocks. The southeast slope merges into the Piedmont Plateau, along which, in places, are groups of outlying low ridges that have been isolated by erosion from the main ridge, but exhibiting as a rule similar rock types.
In the middle and northern parts of the Blue Eidge and the adjacent portions of the Piedmont Plateau in Virginia one of the dominant igneous rocks of granitoid type is a quartz-bearing pyroxene syenite. The igneous complex, of which pyroxene syenite is the chief type, may represent a Precambrian batholithic intrusion, exposed at intervals for a distance of 150 miles in a belt up to 20 miles or more in width. Differentiation of the syenite magma has given rise to a variety of related rocks, some of which are of particular interest.
Studies of the igneous complex forming the central core of the Blue
Eidge in middle and northern Virginia are sufficiently advanced to indicate that the rock types exhibit certain kinships which mark them as differentiates from a common magma, and that this igneous complex, designated by the writers as the Blue Eidge petrographic province, shows certain important differences in mineralogy and chemistry from the igneous rocks which enter into the composition of the Piedmont Plateau to the east.

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/27/1/193/3413539/BUL27-0193.pdf by guest

  • MAP
  • S H O W IN G
  • LO CA TIO N
  • OF
  • THE
  • R O C K S

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/27/1/193/3413539/BUL27-0193.pdf by guest

196 WATSON AND CLINE---- ROCKS OF THE BLUE RIDGE REGION

The results presented in this paper are based on field and laboratory investigations of the igneous complex which forms the central core of the northern and middle Blue Ridge region and the adjacent portions of the extreme western margin of the Piedmont Plateau, undertaken at brief intervals during the past ten years. The scope of the paper is limited to a petrographic study of this igneous complex, since a complete discussion of the Blue Ridge igneous complex can not be attempted in advance of a thorough investigation of the field relationships. The principal claim for this study, therefore, is as a contribution to the petrography of the Blue Ridge geology.

P r e v i o u s g e o l o g i c W o r k

Probably the first reference to the syenites of the Blue Ridge in Virginia was by Prof. William Barton Rogers2 in his annual reports on the Geology of the Virginias from 1835 to 1841. He refers to the occurrence of syenitic rocks at various places in the Blue Ridge, notably in the James River and Tye River gaps, and makes special reference to the pronounced porphyritic texture of the syenite in Tye River Gap.
During his early work in Virginia Prof. William M. Fontaine devoted considerable time in the field to study of the Blue Ridge syenites. Only occasional reference is made to their occurrence in his publications, yet the degree to which they attracted his attention is shown by the large collection of the rocks which he made from different parts of the Blue Ridge and adjacent portions of the Piedmont Plateau. These collections are preserved in Brooks Museum at the University of Virginia and have been freely used in this study.
In 1884, Professor Fontaine sent to the United States National Museum specimens of unakite from Milams Gap, in Page and Madison counties, Virginia, and later, in 1913, specimens of the associated syenite This led to the first petrographic description of these rocks in 1904 by Mr. W. C. Phalen,3 who designated the syenite of the Page-Madison counties area as hypersthene akerite because of its similarity to the akerites of Norway described by Brogger.
In 1894, Mr. Arthur Keith4 mapped the syenite occurring southwest of
Front Royal along the extreme western side of the crystalline belt as granite, six varieties of which he distinguished and described in the Blue Ridge region. Keith’s description of one of the varieties follows:

2See a reprint of annual reports and other papers on the geology of the Virginias, by William Barton Rogers, 1884, 832 pages.
3W. C. Phalen: A new occurrence of unakite. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, vol. 45, 1904, pp. 306-316.
4Arthur Keith: Geology of the Catoctin Belt. Fourteenth Ann. Kept. U. S. Geol. Survey, 1894, part 11, pp. 285-395.

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/27/1/193/3413539/BUL27-0193.pdf by guest

197

PREVIOUS GEOLOGIC WORK

“Granite from one mile northwest of Browntown, Virginia, shows quartz, orthoelase, plagioclase, hornblende, a little biotite, magnetite, and, along the feldspar cleavage, chlorite. Another specimen from the same locality shows the same minerals in larger crystals. A third specimen contains a large amount of garnet in rude crystals and fragments, a little apatite and pyrite, and but very little orthoelase” (page 300).

In 1906, Weed and Watson5 described the coarse-grained hypersthene syenite traced by them at irregular intervals along the west side of the Blue Eidge from Dickeys Hill, south of Front Royal, in Warren County, southward to Hightop and beyond in Greene County. Farther southwest, at Stony Man, they stated that the field relations indicated the syenite to be of later age than the Catoctin schist, which is regarded as Algonkian.
In 1907, Watson8 published a brief discussion of hypersthene syenite and associated hornblende norite from a locality in the northern part of Floyd County, Yirginia. Attention was called to the close similarity of the syenite from Floyd County to the unakite-bearing syenite at Milams Gap, in Page and Madison counties, more than 100 miles to the northeast, and to similar syenites of Norway.
In 1913, Watson and Taber7published a detailed discussion, including descriptions of a syenite-norite-nelsonite series of rutile-bearing rocks in Amherst and Nelson counties, Yirginia, and of the hypersthene syenite occurring on the west slope of the Blue Ridge farther southwest in Roanoke County. The Amherst-Nelson counties rock series shows striking relationships in mineralogy and chemistry to the granite-syenite-norite series of the Blue Ridge igneous complex of the larger Blue Ridge province.

Qu a r t z -b e a r i n g H y p e r s t h e n e -A n d e s i n e S y e n i t e

DISTRIBUTION

Quartz-bearing hypersthene syenite is. one of the most abundantly occurring granitoid rocks in the central Blue Ridge region. It has been observed in the Blue Ridge and adjacent portions of the Piedmont Plateau in numerous exposures distributed over a distance of about 150 miles in a northeast-southwest direction (see map, figure 1). The maximum distance between extreme occurrences along a direction (northwest-southeast) normal to the axis of the Blue Eidge will probably not exceed 30

EW. H. Weed and T. L. Watson: The Virginia copper deposits. Economic Geology, vol. i, 1906, pp. 309-330 ; see especially pp. 318-319. s Thomas L. Watson: The occurrence of nickel in Virginia. Trans. Amer. Inst. Mng. Engrs., 1907, pp. 306-316; Mineral Resources of Virginia, 1907, pp. 31-33, 580-582.
7Thomas L. Watson and Stephen Taber: Geology of the titanium and apatite deposits of Virginia. Bull. III-A, Virginia Geol. Survey, 1913, 308 pages; see also Bull. 430, U. S. Geol. Survey, 1910, pp. 200-213.

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/27/1/193/3413539/BUL27-0193.pdf by guest

198 WATSON AND CLINE---- ROCKS OP THE BLUE RIDGE REGION

miles. The most southwesterly known exposure of the syenite is in Floycl County and the most northeasterly one is in Warren County, a short distance south of Front Royal. Exposures of the rock have been observed in every county of the Blue Ridge region between Floyd and Warren counties.
The syenite frequently occurs in the northwest slope of the Blue Ridge, where it may form the basement on which the Lower Cambrian sediments rest. Usually it is more abundantly exposed on the southeast slope of the ridge, since in this position the Cambrian sediments have been removed to a large extent by erosion. It is not restricted, however, in distribution to the slopes of the Blue Ridge, but is noted in many localities in the most elevated portions of the ridge. Along the western margin of the Piedmont Plateau hypersthene syenite is the chief rock, forming Tobacco Row Mountain in Amherst County, and is also noted in similar positions in Madison and Greene counties. Hypersthene syenite forms the Peaks of Otter, and it is very abundant in James River Gap and vicinity, where it makes up large portions of the central core of the Blue Ridge.

MEGASCOPIC CHARACTER

Normally the hypersthene syenite is of greenish color, which varies in shade from a moderately light greenish to a dark greenish gray rock. It shows granitic texture, which varies from medium fine to coarse granular, and having usually a pronounced greasy or waxy appearance. In places the rock is porphyritic in texture, with phenocrysts of orthoelase, rarely of pyroxene. Variation in color of the fresh rock is noted, dependent on the relative proportions of the felsic and mafic minerals, the former varying in amount from 75 per cent to 92 per cent. In structure the rock is usually massive, but in places indistinct to pronounced foliation is shown, due to the effects of pressure metamorphism. Weathered surfaces are usually deeply pitted from inequality of resistance of the component minerals, and the rock yields on complete decay a reddish brown soil which is quite fertile.

The syenite is composed essentially of orthoelase (microcline), plagio- clase, and pyroxene, each of which may be recognized in hand specimens. Feldspar is the most abundant constituent of the rock and is usually of dark greenish gray color, with glistening cleavage surfaces, but decidedly waxy on fracture surfaces. Quartz is nearly always present, but in vary- ing amount, some specimens showing very little, while others contain considerable. Biotite occurs in places and in several localities it is pres- ent in sufficient amount to be designated a characterizing accessory. There are facies of the rock in which hornblende is an important con-

Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/27/1/193/3413539/BUL27-0193.pdf by guest

QUARTZ-BEARING HYPERSTHENE-ANDESTNE SYENITE

199

stituent. Garnet of red color is developed in grains and crystals of the syenite of certain localities in Roanoke County and of those in Greene and adjoining counties in the northern Blue Ridge.

MICROSCOPIC CHARACTER

Normative feldspar ranges in amount from 56 per cent to 66 per cent.
The varieties of orthoclase, microcline, albite, and calcic andesine make up the feldspar content of the rock. Of these andesine is the chief feldspar, although orthoclase or microcline may equal or exceed it in amount in some thin sections. Like the rocks of other areas which it most
-closely resembles and with which it is compared in subsequent pages of this paper, a noteworthy feature of the soda-lime feldspars in the rock is the frequent absence of twinning lamellas, which might readily be mistaken for orthoclase. Microcline is the dominant variety of feldspar in some thin sections. Albite occurs in most thin-sections studied, not as separate individuals, but intergrown with the’potash varieties as mocroperthite. Andesine is developed in anhedral forms and is frequently twinned, both on the albite and pericline laws. Its composition, determined by Larsen 011 four specimens of the rock collected from different localities, by measurements on the rhombic section and of the index of refraction, is as follows:

III
........................................................................................ Ab1An1

......... AbgjAn^

III ........................................................................................ Ab^An^ IV ........................................................................................ AbjoAn*, V

....................................................................................... Ab^Aiijj
I. Specimen of syenite collected near the southeast foot of the Blue Ridge, in Browns Gap, Albemarle County, Virginia.
II. Specimen of syenite collected near the southeast foot of Tobacco Row
Mountain, in the vicinity of Elon, Amherst County, Virginia.
III. Specimen of syenite collected on northwest slope of the northern Blue
Ridge, near the boundary between Madison and Greene counties, Vir- ginia.
IV. Specimen of syenite collected from the base of northeast slope of the
Peaks of Otter, Bedford County, Virginia.
V. Specimen of syenite collected 1y2 miles east of Vinton, Roanoke County,
Virginia.

Recommended publications
  • DECEMBER 2014201 VOLUME 23~ ISSUE 12 Lynchburg, VA, Inc

    DECEMBER 2014201 VOLUME 23~ ISSUE 12 Lynchburg, VA, Inc

    GEM & MINERAL JOURNAL Official Monthly Publication of the Gem & Mineral Society of DECEMBER 2014201 VOLUME 23~ ISSUE 12 Lynchburg, VA, Inc WWW.LYNCHBURGROCKCLUB.ORG Presidents Message: Hello To All, will supply the delicious fried chicken so we are counting What a great auction at the November GMSL meeting. on everyone else to bring in vegetables, pasta salads, We picked out a lot of different specimens in hopes of potato salads etc, and please don’t forget some sweet having something for everyone to bid on. It was a great desserts. We also have a Dirty Santa gift exchange. All success because of all the members and visitors that you need to do to participate is bring in a wrapped gift of came out and participated. A big thank you to all. I hope about $15.00 value that is hobby related. All gifts will be everyone got a nice specimen to add to their collection. It placed on a table and each person will draw a number, may be a long time, if ever, we are able to have such nice which will be the order for opening the gifts. Number one pieces as the Burmese Jade, beautiful Agates, and nice will choose a package and open it. Number two will then pieces of Turquoise just to name a few of the most open a gift and if the previously opened gift is more to popular specimens. We will keep our eyes open for their liking they can make a trade, and so on until all gifts collections for sale in the future.
  • Geochemistry of the Catheart Mountain Porphyry Copper Deposit, Maine

    Geochemistry of the Catheart Mountain Porphyry Copper Deposit, Maine

    Maine Geological S urvey Studies in Maine Geology: Volume 4 1989 Geochemistry of the Catheart Mountain Porphyry Copper Deposit, Maine Robert A. Ayuso U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia 22092 ABSTRACT The Ordovician Catheart Mountain pluton is the best example ofa porphyry copper system in the New England Appalachians. It intrudes the Ordovician Attean quartz monzonite in the Proterozoic Chain Lakes massif. The pluton consists of equigranular granodiorite intruded by porphyritic dikes of granite and granodiorite which contain up to 4% sulfides (pyrite, chalcopyrite, and molybdenite). The equigranular host rocks and the porphyritic dikes are generally chemically similar, showing scattered compositional variations which reflect changes imposed on the pluton during crystallization and hydrothermal alteration. Most rocks are hydrated, containing high C02 and high S. The most intensely altered parts of the pluton are potassic (up to 6.9 wt % KiO) and highly mineralized, especially with Cu (up to 3900 ppm), but also with Mo (up to 320 ppm). The host granodiorite and porphyritic dikes are depleted in Ca, Na, Fe2+ and Sr as a function of increasing Cu; the sulfide-rich rocks are enriched in Rb and they have high Fe3+/Fe2+, K/Na, and Rb/Sr values. Abundances and ratios of the highly-charged cations (e.g. Zr, Hf, Ta, and Th) in the Catheart Mountain pluton resemble those in the Devonian granodiorites in the northern Maine plutonic belt. Abundances and ratios of the highly-charged cations in the Sally Mountain pluton, a nearby body also containing Cu and Mo mineralization, differ significantly from those in the Catheart Mountain pluton suggesting that the two plutons are not comagmatic.
  • Enstatite and Bronzite

    Enstatite and Bronzite

    On Gem Or'thopyroxenes: Enstatite and Bronzite BY PETE J. DUNN, M.A., F.G.A. Department of Mineral Sciences Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20560 Introduction 1963). Although petrologists have sub- Enstatite and hypersthene are mem- divided this series into 6· subspecies bers of an isomorphous series of ortho- (Table I), the practicing gemologist is rhombic pyroxenes. The pure end primarily concerned with only the members of the series are enstatite, magnesium-rich members which yield MgSi03 and orthoferrosilite, Fe+2 some attractive gems. Adopting the Si03. Iron and magnesium substitute classification used by Deer et at. mutually between Mg100Fe+20 and (1963), enstatite is designated as a about Mg10Fe+290 (Deer et al., member of the series having 88% to TABLE I NOMENCLATURE OF THE ORTHOPYROXENES enstatite EnlOOFsO to En88Fs12 FeO < 6.50% bronzite En88Fs12 to En70Fs30 FeO> 6.50% hypersthene En70Fs30 to En50Fs50 FeO> 16.32% ferrohypersthene En50Fs50 to En30Fs70 FeO > 27.23% eolite En30Fs70 to En12Fs88 FeO > 38.12% orthoferrosil ite En12Fs88 to EnOFslOO FeO >47.92% En-Enstatite member Fs-Orthoferrosilite member 118 GEMS & GEMOLOGY 100% of the magnesium end member; rences include the noted Ceylon green- bronzite having 70% to 88% of the ish enstatite, and the dark green mate- magnesium end member and hypers- rial from the San Carlos Indian Reser- thene between 50% and 70% of the vation in Arizona (Sinkankas, 1959). magnesium end member. Members of All numbered specimens are from the series with Fe > Mg are usually the U.S. National Mineral Collection at opaque and of little gemological in- the Smithsonian Institution, Washing- terest.
  • Mineralogy and Paragenesis of Amphiboles from Gibson Peak Pluton

    Mineralogy and Paragenesis of Amphiboles from Gibson Peak Pluton

    THE AIVIERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL. 49, SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER. 1964 MINERALOGY AND PARAGENESIS OF AMPHIBOLES FROM GIBSON PEAK PLUTON. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA PBrBn W. Lrelrlx, U. S. Geotogi,calSurvey, Denaer,Colorad,o. Ansrnacr Ixrnooucrrow Gibson Peak pluton, a 3-squaremile compositeintrusion in the Trin- itv Aips of northern california, is particularly suitablefor investigation of relations between amphibole paragenesisand igneouscrystallization becauseseveral distinctive amphiboles are important constituents of geneticallyrelated rocks that range from gabbro to trondhjemitic tona- lite. This paper describesthe sequenceof amphibole crystallization in difierent parts of the intrusion and reiates the compositionsof three newly analyzedamphiboles to crystallizationsequence and composition of the enclosingrock. The main conclusionis that compositionsof the investigatedamphiboles are as dependenton time of crystallizationwithin their respectiverocks as on bulk rock composition. Pnrnocn.q.pnrcrNtrnpnBTATroN oF THE Alrpnrsolr panecnNpsrs The generalstructural and petrologicfeatures of Gibson peak pluton are describedelsewhere (Lipman, 1963),and onl1-relations bearing on the origin of the amphibolesare summarizedhere. The pluton is com- posite,and five discreteintrusive units have beenrecognized on the basis of field relations.rn order of intrusion theseare hypersthene-hornblende gabbro, (augite-)hornblendegabbro, hornblende diorite, porphyritic quartz-bearingdiorite, and trondhjemitic biotite tonalite. All units show intrusive contacts with the preceding rocks, are petrographically dis- tinctive, and contain at least one amphibole. An interpretation of th" peak complex paragenesisof the Gibson amphiboles,based mainly on the textural featuresdescribed below, is presentedin Fig. 1. The evi- denceis clear orr the occurrenceof the indicated reactions,but the rela- 1321 PETER W. LIPMAN I I I F I I F I 1 I I cd d l :d d9 z z t.i r F-] {Fl z z.zt- z .=l il.
  • Minerals of the San Luis Valley and Adjacent Areas of Colorado Charles F

    Minerals of the San Luis Valley and Adjacent Areas of Colorado Charles F

    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/22 Minerals of the San Luis Valley and adjacent areas of Colorado Charles F. Bauer, 1971, pp. 231-234 in: San Luis Basin (Colorado), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 22nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 340 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1971 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
  • Geologic Section of the Black Range at Kingston, New Mexico

    Geologic Section of the Black Range at Kingston, New Mexico

    BULLETIN 33 Geologic Section of the Black Range at Kingston, New Mexico BY FREDERICK J. KUELLMER Structure and stratigraphy of the Black Range, detailed petrology of igneous rocks, and general guides to ore exploration 1954 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Eugene Callaghan, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS EX OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ..............................Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley ................................................ Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Robert W. Botts .............................................................................. Albuquerque Holm O. Bursum, Jr ................................................................................ Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ...............................................................................Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio .............................................................................Los Alamos A. A. Kemnitz ...........................................................................................Hobbs Contents Page ABSTRACT ......................................................... …………………………………… 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................4
  • The Significance of Cordierite-Hypersthene Assemblages from the Beitbridge Region of the Central Limpopo Belt; Evidence for Rapid Decompression in the Archaean?

    The Significance of Cordierite-Hypersthene Assemblages from the Beitbridge Region of the Central Limpopo Belt; Evidence for Rapid Decompression in the Archaean?

    American Mineralogist, Volume 69, pages 1036-/049, /984 The significance of cordierite-hypersthene assemblages from the Beitbridge region of the Central Limpopo Belt; evidence for rapid decompression in the Archaean? N. B. W. HARRIS Department of Earth Sciences Open University Milton Keynes, England MK7 6AA AND T. J. B. HOLLAND Department of Earth Sciences University of Cambridge Cambridge, England CB23EQ Abstract The following model equilibria have been observed in metapelites from the Diti Formation of the Central Limpopo belt. (Mg,Fe)zSi206 + 2 AhSiOs + Si02 = (Mg,Fe)zAI4SisOI8 Orthopyroxene Sillimanite Quartz Cordierite 2 (Mg,FehAhShOI2 + 4 AhSiOs + 5 Si02 = 3 (Mg,Fe)zAI4SisO'8 Garnet Sillimanite Quartz Cordierite 2 (Mg,FehAhSi30I2 + 3 Si02 = (Mg,Fe)zAI4SisO'8 + 2 (Mg,Fe)zSi206 Garnet Quartz Cordierite Orthopyroxene 5 (Mg,Fe)zSi206 + 10 Al2SiOs = 4 (Mg,Fe)zAI4Sis018 + 2 (Mg,Fe)Ah04 Orthopyroxene Sillimanite Cordierite Spinel An internally consistent thermodynamic data set in the MAS system for constituent phases has been derived which is also consistent with both calorimetric data and experimental equilibria. Microprobe analyses of the phases present in the Limpopo metapelites have been applied to equilibrium equations derived from this data set, and conditions of P = 4-5 kbar, T> 670°C are implied assuming aH,o = O. Application of published cordierite-free thermobarometers both from the pelites and interlayered mafic granulites, provides similar P-T conditions (P = 3.5-5 kbar, T = 750:<:50°C) indicating that metamorphism was virtually dry. Conditions of aH,O< 0.5 are also implied by analysis of equilibria involving hydrous phases. Decompression reactions are observed both in this and in earlier studies of supracrustal rocks from the Central Limpopo Belt, and a period of essentially isothermal uplift is suggested, which raised crustal blocks from depths of about 40 km to 15 km.
  • Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina by W

    Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina by W

    .'.' .., Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie RUTILE GUMMITE IN GARNET RUBY CORUNDUM GOLD TORBERNITE GARNET IN MICA ANATASE RUTILE AJTUNITE AND TORBERNITE THULITE AND PYRITE MONAZITE EMERALD CUPRITE SMOKY QUARTZ ZIRCON TORBERNITE ~/ UBRAR'l USE ONLV ,~O NOT REMOVE. fROM LIBRARY N. C. GEOLOGICAL SUHVEY Information Circular 24 Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie Raleigh 1978 Second Printing 1980. Additional copies of this publication may be obtained from: North CarOlina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Geological Survey Section P. O. Box 27687 ~ Raleigh. N. C. 27611 1823 --~- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SECTION The Geological Survey Section shall, by law"...make such exami­ nation, survey, and mapping of the geology, mineralogy, and topo­ graphy of the state, including their industrial and economic utilization as it may consider necessary." In carrying out its duties under this law, the section promotes the wise conservation and use of mineral resources by industry, commerce, agriculture, and other governmental agencies for the general welfare of the citizens of North Carolina. The Section conducts a number of basic and applied research projects in environmental resource planning, mineral resource explora­ tion, mineral statistics, and systematic geologic mapping. Services constitute a major portion ofthe Sections's activities and include identi­ fying rock and mineral samples submitted by the citizens of the state and providing consulting services and specially prepared reports to other agencies that require geological information. The Geological Survey Section publishes results of research in a series of Bulletins, Economic Papers, Information Circulars, Educa­ tional Series, Geologic Maps, and Special Publications.
  • Jun 2012 Rockhounder Starting Point

    Jun 2012 Rockhounder Starting Point

    Page 1 THE JUNE 2 0 1 2 ROCKHOUNDER PURPOSE: The purpose of the Gem, Lapidary, and Mineral Society of Montgomery County MD., Inc. is “To increase knowledge and popular interest in earth sciences, geology, mineralogy, paleontology, lapidary arts, and related subjects.” REGULAR MEETING: Meetings are held the 2nd Monday of the month from September to June. The Society will meet on Monday June 11th in the dining room of the Rockville Senior Center, 1150 Carnation Drive, Rockville. A short business meeting will begin at 7:45 pm but the room is available to us at 7:30 pm so come early and chat with old friends. The speaker will Bob Farrar . The topic will be “The Cruzeiro Mine: World's Greatest Tourmaline Mine.” Bob Farrar has been collecting rocks, minerals, and fossils for over 40 years. He has traveled extensively in pursuit of rock collecting, including making several trips to Brazil. He has written a number of articles about his travels for Rock & Gem and other publications. Bob holds a Ph. D. in entomology, and works for the U. S. Dept. Of Agriculture in Beltsville, MD. A resident of Bowie, he is also a dealer of Minerals & Fossils. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS will possibly meet Monday, June 18, at the Home of Andy Muir. The President will notify Board members if a meeting is necessary. All Board members are expected to at- tend if meeting is called. Any member is welcome to attend but kindly let Andy know if you plan to attend at: <[email protected]> or phone 301 990 1370.
  • Redalyc.PETROGRAPHY of EXOTIC CLASTS in the SOEBI BLANCO

    Redalyc.PETROGRAPHY of EXOTIC CLASTS in the SOEBI BLANCO

    Boletín de Ciencias de la Tierra ISSN: 0120-3630 [email protected] Universidad Nacional de Colombia Colombia URBANI, FRANCO; GRANDE, SEBASTIÁN; MÉNDEZ BAAMONDE, JOSÉ PETROGRAPHY OF EXOTIC CLASTS IN THE SOEBI BLANCO FORMATION, BONAIRE, NETHERLANDS ANTILLES Boletín de Ciencias de la Tierra, núm. 33, enero-junio, 2013, pp. 59-70 Universidad Nacional de Colombia Medellín, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=169528792004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative PETROGRAPHY OF EXOTIC CLASTS IN THE SOEBI BLANCO FORMATION, BONAIRE, NETHERLANDS ANTILLES “PETROGRAFÍA DE LOS CLASTOS EXOTICOS DE LA FORMACIÓN SOEBI BLANCO, BONAIRE, ANTILLAS HOLANDESAS FRANCO URBANI Fundación Venezolana de Investigaciones Sismológicas, Caracas - Universidad Central de Venezuela, Facultad de Ingeniería, Escuela de Geología, Minas y Geofísica SEBASTIÁN GRANDE Universidad Central de Venezuela, Facultad de Ingeniería, Escuela de Geología, Minas y Geofísica. JOSÉ MÉNDEZ BAAMONDE Universidad Central de Venezuela, Facultad de Ciencias. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra. Ciudad Universitaria. Caracas. Email: [email protected]. Recibido para evaluación: 10 de marzo de 2013 / Aceptación: 19 de Junio de 2013 / Recibida versión fi nal: 02 de Julio de 2013 ABSTRACT: The Paleocen e Soebi Blanco Formation in the island of Bonaire in Southeastern Caribbean has attracted the attention of geologists since 1931 when P. J. Pijpers pointed out the presence of a wide range of “foreign pebbles” in conglomerate beds. Interest was further boosted in 1986 with a Grenvillian age determined in a granulitic pebble (ca.
  • Geology and Mineral Deposits of the Roseland District of Central Virginia

    Geology and Mineral Deposits of the Roseland District of Central Virginia

    Geology and Mineral Deposits of the Roseland District of Central Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1371 Geology and Mineral Deposits of the Roseland District of Central Virginia By NORMAN HERZ and ERIC R. FORCE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1371 Relations among anorthosite, ferrodioritic rocks, and titanium-mineral deposits in Nelson and Amherst Counties in the Blue Ridge of Virginia UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1987 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Herz, Norman, 1923- Geology and mineral deposits of the Roseland district of central Virginia. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper; 1371) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1371 1. Geology-Virginia-Roseland Region. 2. Mines and mineral resources- Virginia-Roseland Region. I. Force, Eric R. II. Title. III. Series: Geological Survey professional paper ; 1371. QE174.R67H47 1987 557.55'49 85-600280 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract_____________________________ 1 Post-Grenville rocks-Continued Introduction_________________. 1 Surficial deposits ___ 33 General geologic and economic setting _. I Deposits of present valley systems _____________ 33 Previous geological work ____________ 3 Inactive boulder fans ______________________ 33 Mapping and stratigraphy _____. 3 Ridgetop gravel deposits ______________________ 33 Economic geology _________. 4 Radiometric age determinations ____________________ 33 Proposed lithologic units _______. 4 Previous determinations in the region ______________ 33 Field work _______________________ 5 New age data __________________ 34 Acknowledgments _________________ 5 Petrogenesis of the igneous rocks _____________________ 35 Pre-Grenville and Grenville rocks _________ 6 Origin of anorthosite and ferrodiorites ______________ 35 Banded granulites and associated rocks.
  • Chemical and Physical Controls for Base Met Al Deposition in the Cascade Range of Washington

    Chemical and Physical Controls for Base Met Al Deposition in the Cascade Range of Washington

    State of Washington Department of Natural Resources BERT L. COLE, Commissioner of Public Lands DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Bulletin No. 58 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL CONTROLS FOR BASE MET AL DEPOSITION IN THE CASCADE RANGE OF WASHINGTON By ALAN ROBERT GRANT STATE PRINTING PLANT ~ OLYMPIA, WASHINCTON 1969 For safe by Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. Price $1.50 Errata sheet for Washington Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 58, Chemical and Physical Controls for Base Metal Deeosition in the Cascade Range of Washington ( By Alan Robert Grant Errors noted in the p-inted text are listed below. The editors regret these and possibly other mistakes in editing. Page 12 Paragraph 5, line 2, "heliocpter" should read helicopter. 14 Paragraph 6, line 6, •programed" should read programmed. 15 Figure 2, 11 Ntesoic" in explanation should read Mesozoic. 19 Paragraph 4, line 7, "authochthonous" should read autochthonous. 22 Paragraph 6, line 4, "extension Ntesozoic 11 should read exten•ioo.o f 1l1e Mesozoic. 22 Paragraph 7, line 1, ''aforemention" should read aforementioned. 25 Paragraph 4, line 7, "Misch" should be changed to Vance. 25 Paragraph 7, line 7, "Totoosh, pluton" should read Totoosh pluton. 26 Paragraph 1, line 4, "classical" should read classic. 32 Paragraph 4, line 1, "alkaline" should be changed to acidic intrusive. 33 Paragraph 1, line 1, "alkaline" should be changed to acidic intrusive. 48 Une 3 of Figure 16 caption, "alkaline" should be changed to acidic intrusive~ 49 Paragraph 3, line 5, "Creasy" should read Creasey. 51 Paragraph 3, line 1, "Creasy II should read Creasey.