Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation Rules for Lithology Merge Information Entry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation Rules for Lithology Merge Information Entry State of Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Vicki S. McConnell, State Geologist OREGON GEOLOGIC DIGITAL COMPILATION RULES FOR LITHOLOGY MERGE INFORMATION ENTRY G E O L O G Y F A N O D T N M I E N M E T R R A A L P I E N D D U N S O T G R E I R E S O 1937 2006 Revisions: Feburary 2, 2005 January 1, 2006 NOTICE The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries is publishing this paper because the infor- mation furthers the mission of the Department. To facilitate timely distribution of the information, this report is published as received from the authors and has not been edited to our usual standards. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation Published in conformance with ORS 516.030 For copies of this publication or other information about Oregon’s geology and natural resources, contact: Nature of the Northwest Information Center 800 NE Oregon Street #5 Portland, Oregon 97232 (971) 673-1555 http://www.naturenw.org Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries - Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation i RULES FOR LITHOLOGY MERGE INFORMATION ENTRY The lithology merge unit contains 5 parts, separated by periods: Major characteristic.Lithology.Layering.Crystals/Grains.Engineering Lithology Merge Unit label (Lith_Mrg_U field in GIS polygon file): major_characteristic.LITHOLOGY.Layering.Crystals/Grains.Engineering major characteristic - lower case, places the unit into a general category .LITHOLOGY - in upper case, generally the compositional/common chemical lithologic name(s) for the major rock types in the unit, but can also reflect the grain size (for sediments) or the general geomorphological setting (for unconsolidated rocks) .Layering - upper case L followed by lower case describer, describes the thickness/type of bedding .Crystals/Grains - upper case C or G followed by lower case describer, describes the size of the crystals or grains that make up the lithology .Engineering - upper case E followed by lower case describer, describes some of the rock mechanic or outcrop-level structural features of the lithology unc.FLV.Ltc.Gslt_gvl.End = unconsolidated rock, fluvial, thick layering, silt to gravel grains, no data engineering NOTE All of the terms in the different parts of the three merge labels are chosen by the DOGAMI staff and other geologists most familiar with the pertinent area’s formations and lithologies. They reflect the present general understanding within the geologic community of the accepted stratigraphy and lithologies in that part of the state. Thus, the merge units usually reclassify the unit from the map author’s original stratigraphic scheme. The stratigraphic and the lithologic nomenclature cannot be referenced to a single publication’s definition of terms. Instead, they represent the general consensus among geologists, working in a particular area of the state or in a particular field of geology, of a term’s definition at the time of the merge units’ formulation and for that version of the Oregon Geologic Framework Layer. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries - Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation 1 General rules The geological terms used in the lithology merge name come from the original author’s description of the unit. In some cases, we will opt to use the map unit name and map subunit name to derive the lithology merge unit label. They refl ect the changes in geologic usage through the years. They are descriptive, rather than quantitative, and therefore do not carry any relationship to specifi c engineering defi nitions or geological classifi cations When placed between the abbreviations within each part of the lithology merge unit, the underscore equals “to” and no space between abbreviations equals “and”. Example: f_m=fi ne to medium, fm=fi ne/medium Use only the author’s characterization of the rocks--the major subunit or, if no major/minor subunits are designated, the “nd” subunits (from the map subunit relative abundance fi eld of the Geologic Map Unit name table), to decide on the major characteristics and lithology parts of the lithology merge unit, and whether or not to use a layering, crystals/grains or engineering descriptive term. Do not use the minor subunits. If, based on the major subunits and/or the descriptive information found in the lithology tables, the nature of the unit is still equivocal, then use the author’s original map unit name to help decide on the major characteristics or lithology parts of the lithology merge unit Use “sd” or “some data”, rather than “nd” (no data) within the layering, crystals/grains and engineering describers for the following situation: 1. If any of the major subunit names contain applicable lithology description information (like layer thickness), but that information is not found for all of the major subunits. 2. If none of the major subunits contain information, but it is found in one or more of the minor subunits. An example is a case where one or several minor subunits descriptions contain layering information, because that lithology is usually layered, but the major subunits do not contain any layering information A data rule that applies to the entire database and particularly to the lithology merge portion is that we will consider using the map unit name instead of, or in addition to, the subunit name where the subunit name is not discussed in unit explanation or there is a question as to the author’s intent, e.g. no major or minor subunit is identifi ed. The Glossary of Geology, 4th edition, is the guide for understanding the defi nitions of the geological terms and describers used in the lithology merge unit Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries - Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation 2 major characteristics “Flow rocks”=fl w =used for any unit that consists solely of lava fl ows, and does not contain any volcaniclastic parts (includes vitrophyre) “Interbedded sedimentary rocks”=isx=used for sedimentary rocks (usually as subunits) interbedded with AND, BAS, etc. “Intrusive rocks”=intr=used for masses of rock in which are the major subunit name contains the words “dikes” or “intrusives” “Metamorphic rocks”=met=used for units in which the subunit names are clearly metamorphic lithologies, e.g. schist, amphibolite, gneiss, quartzite, etc. “Plutonic rocks”=plu=used for masses of igneous rocks, basically denoting stocks, batholiths and sills, or for any rock where “dike”or “intrusive” is not clearly named in the subunit name Sediment=sed=used for unconsolidated sedimentary deposits that do not have a geomorphological characterization with them, e.g. “gravel” in map subunit name but no modifi er in map subunit modifi er. “Sedimentary rocks”=srx=used for consolidated sedimentary deposits, and is based on the presence of rock names rather than sediment sizes in the major subunit name (example: sandstone is srx, sand is sed) “Ultramfi c rocks”=umf=used for units in which the major subunit names are clearly ultramafi c lithologies, e.g. dunite, peridotite, pyroxenite, serpentinite, etc. “Unconsolidated rocks”=unc=unconsolidated surfi cial rocks that are described by a geomorphological term in the subunit or map unit names. Includes: alluvium, colluvium, talus, landslide, alluvial fan, eolian, loess, lacustrine, terrace, glacial, deltaic deposits “Sedimentary/Volcanic rocks” =sv= used for basalt fl ows and two or more major and minor sedimentary subunits; use “mix” as the lithology and “CG” for Crystals/Grains. “Volcaniclastic rocks”=vlc=used for unit in which the major subunits contain any type of volcanic particulate rock (tuff, breccia, ash, pyroclastic rocks, cinders, etc.) If a sedimentary subunit is modifi ed by “volcanic”, then it is a volcanic rock, and not a sedimentary rock. If the only major volcanic subunit in an otherwise sedimentary rock is “tuff”, then the unit is an “srx” “Volcanic rocks”=vol= used for a unit in which the major subunits contain both volcanic particulate lithologies and lava fl ows or if the major subunits are named “volcanic, unspecifi ed” Single letters, such as “s”=sedimentary, “p”=plutonic, “v”=volcanic, “i”=intrusive, “u”=ultramfi c, “m”=metamorphic, are used together for a mixture of several different types of major or “nd” Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries - Oregon Geologic Digital Compilation 3 lithologies in the same unit. They are listed in alphabetical order and can be modifi ed by “m” at the end, if the rocks are metamorphosed. “m” at the end of any of the major characteristic units names means that the units or subunits are metamorphosed to some extent. Use an “m” for subunits that are described as foliated, and/or begin with the prefi x “meta”. The description of the metamorphism as “slight”, or hydrothermal or other alteration, or as lineated is not enough, by itself, to modify the major characteristic with “m”. Gabbros and melagabbros are excluded from ultramafi cs unless they are accompanied by other clearly ultramafi c major subunits Peridotites are ultramafi c rocks and include wehrlite Pyroxenites are ultramafi c rocks and include harzburgite, lherzolite, websterite Do not use mélange as a major characteristic term Lithology Abbreviation Argillite, can be “srx” rather than “met”, if it amphibolite amp is the only metamorphic subunit among other andesite and sedimentary subunits. The name, by itself, does aplite apl not mean that the major characteristic name should argillite arg be modifi ed with an “m” ash ash basalt bas basaltic andesite bnd Agglomerate=”tuff” basaltic trachyandesite bta basanite bst Lithology: breccia bxa chert cht All of the letters in the lithology part of the lithology cinder cin claystone cls merge unit name are capitalized, like BAS for conglomerate cgl basalt or GVL for gravel. dacite dac diorite drt Up to two lithologic names are listed in the dunite dun lithology part of the merge unit.
Recommended publications
  • Source and Bedrock Distribution of Gold and Platinum-Group Metals in the Slate Creek Area, Northern.Chistochina Mining District, East-Central Alaska
    Source and Bedrock Distribution of Gold and Platinum-Group Metals in the Slate Creek Area, Northern.Chistochina Mining District, East-Central Alaska By: Jeffrey Y. Foley and Cathy A. Summers Open-file report 14-90******************************************1990 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary BUREAU OF MINES T S Arv. Director TN 23 .U44 90-14 c.3 UNITED STATES BUREAU OF MINES -~ ~ . 4,~~~~1 JAMES BOYD MEMORIAL LIBRARY CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Acknowledgments 2 Location, access, and land status 2 History and production 4 Previous work 8 Geology 8 Regional and structural geologic setting 8 Rock units 8 Dacite stocks, dikes, and sills 8 Limestone 9 Argillite and sandstone 9 Differentiated igneous rocks north of the Slate Creek Fault Zone 10 Granitic rocks 16 Tertiary conglomerate 16 Geochemistry and metallurgy 18 Mineralogy 36 Discussion 44 Recommendations 45 References 47 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Map of Slate Creek and surrounding area, in the northern Chistochina Mining District 3 2. Geologic map of the Slate Creek area, showing sample localities and cross section (in pocket) 3. North-dipping slaty argillite with lighter-colored sandstone intervals in lower Miller Gulch 10 4. North-dipping differentiated mafic and ultramafic sill capping ridge and overlying slaty argillite at upper Slate Creek 11 5. Dike swarm cutting Jurassic-Cretaceous turbidites in Miller Gulch 12 6 60-ft-wide diorite porphyry and syenodiorite porphyry dike at Miller Gulch 13 7. Map showing the locations of PGM-bearing mafic and ultramafic rocks and major faults in the east-central Alaska Range 14 8. Major oxides versus Thornton-Tuttle differentiation index 17 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Podiform Chromite Deposits—Database and Grade and Tonnage Models
    Podiform Chromite Deposits—Database and Grade and Tonnage Models Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5157 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER View of the abandoned Chrome Concentrating Company mill, opened in 1917, near the No. 5 chromite mine in Del Puerto Canyon, Stanislaus County, California (USGS photograph by Dan Mosier, 1972). Insets show (upper right) specimen of massive chromite ore from the Pillikin mine, El Dorado County, California, and (lower left) specimen showing disseminated layers of chromite in dunite from the No. 5 mine, Stanislaus County, California (USGS photographs by Dan Mosier, 2012). Podiform Chromite Deposits—Database and Grade and Tonnage Models By Dan L. Mosier, Donald A. Singer, Barry C. Moring, and John P. Galloway Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5157 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 This report and any updates to it are available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5157/ For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Mosier, D.L., Singer, D.A., Moring, B.C., and Galloway, J.P., 2012, Podiform chromite deposits—database and grade and tonnage models: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide: Soil Parent Material 1 Kilometre Dataset
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NERC Open Research Archive User Guide: Soil Parent Material 1 kilometre dataset. Environmental Modelling Internal Report OR/14/025 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ENVIRONMENTAL Modelling INTERNAL REPORT OR/14/025 User Guide: Soil Parent Material 1 kilometre dataset. The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights 2012. Ordnance Survey Licence R. Lawley. No. 100021290. Keywords Contributor/editor Parent Material, Soil,UKSO. B. Rawlins. National Grid Reference SW corner 999999,999999 Centre point 999999,999999 NE corner 999999,999999 Map Sheet 999, 1:99 000 scale, Map name Front cover Soil Parent Material 1km dataset. Bibliographical reference LAWLEY., R. USER GUIDE: SOIL PARENT Material 1 Kilometre dataset. 2012. User Guide: Soil Parent Material 1km dataset.. British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/14/025. 20pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, email [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2014. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2012 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithology and Internal Structure of the San Andreas Fault at Depth Based
    1 1 Lithology and Internal Structure of the San Andreas Fault at depth based on 2 characterization of Phase 3 whole-rock core in the San Andreas Fault Observatory at 3 Depth (SAFOD) Borehole 4 By Kelly K. Bradbury1, James P. Evans1, Judith S. Chester2, Frederick M. Chester2, and David L. Kirschner3 5 1Geology Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321-4505 6 2Center for Tectonophysics and Department of Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, 7 Texas 77843 8 3Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri 63108 9 10 Abstract 11 We characterize the lithology and structure of the spot core obtained in 2007 during 12 Phase 3 drilling of the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD) in order to determine 13 the composition, structure, and deformation processes of the fault zone at 3 km depth where 14 creep and microseismicity occur. A total of approximately 41 m of spot core was taken from 15 three separate sections of the borehole; the core samples consist of fractured arkosic sandstones 16 and shale west of the SAF zone (Pacific Plate) and sheared fine-grained sedimentary rocks, 17 ultrafine black fault-related rocks, and phyllosilicate-rich fault gouge within the fault zone 18 (North American Plate). The fault zone at SAFOD consists of a broad zone of variably damaged 19 rock containing localized zones of highly concentrated shear that often juxtapose distinct 20 protoliths. Two zones of serpentinite-bearing clay gouge, each meters-thick, occur at the two 21 locations of aseismic creep identified in the borehole on the basis of casing deformation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diversity of Magmatism at a Convergent Plate
    1 Flow of partially molten crust controlling construction, growth and collapse of the Variscan orogenic belt: 2 the geologic record of the French Massif Central 3 4 Vanderhaeghe Olivier1, Laurent Oscar1,2, Gardien Véronique3, Moyen Jean-François4, Gébelin Aude5, Chelle- 5 Michou Cyril2, Couzinié Simon4,6, Villaros Arnaud7,8, Bellanger Mathieu9. 6 1. GET, UPS, CNRS, IRD, 14 avenue E. Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, France 7 2. ETH Zürich, Institute for Geochemistry and Petrology, Clausiusstrasse 25, CH-8038 Zürich, Switzerland 8 3. Université Lyon 1, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5276 LGL-TPE, F-69622, Villeurbanne, France 9 4. Université de Lyon, Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, UJM-UCA-CNRS-IRD, 23 rue Dr. Paul Michelon, 10 42023 Saint Etienne 11 5. School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth,UK 12 6. CRPG, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, UMR7358, 15 rue Notre Dame des Pauvres, F-54501 13 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France 14 7. Univ d’Orléans, ISTO, UMR 7327, 45071, Orléans, France ; CNRS, ISTO, UMR 7327, 45071 Orléans, 15 France ; BRGM, ISTO, UMR 7327, BP 36009, 45060 Orléans, France 16 8. University of Stellenbosch, Department of Earth Sciences, 7602 Matieland, South Africa 17 9. TLS Geothermics, 91 chemin de Gabardie 31200 Toulouse. 18 19 [email protected] 20 +33(0)5 61 33 47 34 21 22 Key words: 23 Variscan belt; French Massif Central; Flow of partially molten crust; Orogenic magmatism; Orogenic plateau; 24 Gravitational collapse. 25 26 Abstract 27 We present here a tectonic-geodynamic model for the generation and flow of partially molten rocks and for 28 magmatism during the Variscan orogenic evolution from the Silurian to the late Carboniferous based on a synthesis 29 of geological data from the French Massif Central.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrographic Study of a Quartz Diorite Stock Near Superior, Pinal County, Arizona
    Petrographic study of a quartz diorite stock near Superior, Pinal County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Puckett, James Carl, 1940- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 23:40:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/554062 PETROGRAPHIC STUDY OF A QUARTZ DIORITE STOCK NEAR SUPERIOR, PINAL COUNTY, ARIZONA by James Carl Puckett, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 0 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re­ quirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judg­ ment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholar­ ship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.13 Paleontological Resources
    Gateway West Transmission Line Draft EIS 3.13 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section addresses the potential impacts from the Proposed Route and Route Alternatives on the known paleontological resources during construction, operation, and decommissioning. The Proposed Route and Route Alternatives pass through areas where paleontological resources are known to exist. The routes, their potential impacts, and mitigation methods to minimize or eliminate impacts are discussed in this section. 3.13.1 Affected Environment This section describes the mapped geology and known paleontological resources near the Proposed Action. It also describes and compares potential impacts of the Proposed Action and Action Alternatives to paleontological resources. Fossils are important scientific and educational resources because of their use in: 1) documenting the presence and evolutionary history of particular groups of now extinct organisms, 2) reconstructing the environments in which these organisms lived, and 3) determining the relative ages of the strata in which they occur. Fossils are also important in determining the geologic events that resulted in the deposition of the sediments in which they were buried. 3.13.1.1 Analysis Area The Project area in Wyoming and Idaho consists of predominantly north-south trending mountain ranges separated by structural basins. The eastern portion of the Project (Segments 1 and 2) would be located within the Laramie Mountains and the Shirley Mountains, which consist predominantly of Precambrian granite and gneisses. Moving west in Wyoming, the Project would cross major structural basins created during the Laramide Orogeny, including the Hanna Basin in Carbon County (Segment 2), and the Greater Green River Basin in Sweetwater County (Segments 3 and 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Composition, Alteration, and Texture of Fault-Related Rocks from Safod Core and Surface Outcrop Analogs
    Pure Appl. Geophys. Ó 2014 Springer Basel DOI 10.1007/s00024-014-0896-6 Pure and Applied Geophysics Composition, Alteration, and Texture of Fault-Related Rocks from Safod Core and Surface Outcrop Analogs: Evidence for Deformation Processes and Fluid-Rock Interactions 1 1 1 1 1 KELLY K. BRADBURY, COLTER R. DAVIS, JOHN W. SHERVAIS, SUSANNE U. JANECKE, and JAMES P. EVANS Abstract—We examine the fine-scale variations in mineralogi- 1. Introduction cal composition, geochemical alteration, and texture of the fault- related rocks from the Phase 3 whole-rock core sampled between 3,187.4 and 3,301.4 m measured depth within the San Andreas Fault Well-constrained geological, geochemical, and Observatory at Depth (SAFOD) borehole near Parkfield, California. geophysical models of active fault zones are needed if This work provides insight into the physical and chemical properties, we are to understand fault zone behavior and earth- structural architecture, and fluid-rock interactions associated with the actively deforming traces of the San Andreas Fault zone at depth. quake deformation, constraining the factors that affect Exhumed outcrops within the SAF system comprised of serpentinite- the distribution of earthquakes, and the nature of slip bearing protolith are examined for comparison at San Simeon, Goat in the shallow crust by developing realistic models of Rock State Park, and Nelson Creek, California. In the Phase 3 SAFOD drillcore samples, the fault-related rocks consist of multiple subsurface fault zone structure and ground motion juxtaposed lenses of sheared, foliated siltstone and shale with block- predictions. Earthquakes nucleate in rocks at depth in-matrix fabric, black cataclasite to ultracataclasite, and sheared (e.g., FAGERENG and TOY 2011;SIBSON 1977; 2003), serpentinite-bearing, finely foliated fault gouge.
    [Show full text]
  • Facies and Mafic
    Metamorphic Facies and Metamorphosed Mafic Rocks l V.M. Goldschmidt (1911, 1912a), contact Metamorphic Facies and metamorphosed pelitic, calcareous, and Metamorphosed Mafic Rocks psammitic hornfelses in the Oslo region l Relatively simple mineral assemblages Reading: Winter Chapter 25. (< 6 major minerals) in the inner zones of the aureoles around granitoid intrusives l Equilibrium mineral assemblage related to Xbulk Metamorphic Facies Metamorphic Facies l Pentii Eskola (1914, 1915) Orijärvi, S. l Certain mineral pairs (e.g. anorthite + hypersthene) Finland were consistently present in rocks of appropriate l Rocks with K-feldspar + cordierite at Oslo composition, whereas the compositionally contained the compositionally equivalent pair equivalent pair (diopside + andalusite) was not biotite + muscovite at Orijärvi l If two alternative assemblages are X-equivalent, l Eskola: difference must reflect differing we must be able to relate them by a reaction physical conditions l In this case the reaction is simple: l Finnish rocks (more hydrous and lower MgSiO3 + CaAl2Si2O8 = CaMgSi2O6 + Al2SiO5 volume assemblage) equilibrated at lower En An Di Als temperatures and higher pressures than the Norwegian ones Metamorphic Facies Metamorphic Facies Oslo: Ksp + Cord l Eskola (1915) developed the concept of Orijärvi: Bi + Mu metamorphic facies: Reaction: “In any rock or metamorphic formation which has 2 KMg3AlSi 3O10(OH)2 + 6 KAl2AlSi 3O10(OH)2 + 15 SiO2 arrived at a chemical equilibrium through Bt Ms Qtz metamorphism at constant temperature and =
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 – Introduction – Review of Rocks and Plate Tectonics Practice Exam and Study Guide
    Chapter 1 – Introduction – Review of Rocks and Plate Tectonics Practice Exam and Study Guide To be able to understand the material covered during this course you need to have a basic background in the kinds of rocks making up our planet. This section of the study guide is aimed at helping you gain that background. 1. What are the three major groups of rocks found on planet Earth? Igneous Rocks 2. Which of the following processes is associated with igneous rocks? a. Solid‐state recrystallization b. Weathering and erosion c. Transportation and deposition d. Cooling a silicate liquid to a solid rock e. The accumulation of granitic debris in a moraine 3. If a silicate liquid flows out along the Earth’s surface or seabed, then it is called _______________. 4. If a silicate liquid exists beneath the Earth’s surface or seabed, then it is called _______________. 5. Which of the following terms refer to a body of magma or its solidified equivalent? a. Basalt b. Sandstone c. Gneiss d. Pluton e. Schist 6. If you can see the crystals making up an igneous rock with the naked eye, then the texture is described as a. Pyroclastic b. Phaneritic c. Aphanitic d. Porphyritic e. Aphyric from Perilous Earth: Understanding Processes Behind Natural Disasters, ver. 1.0, June, 2009 by G.H. Girty, Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University Page 1 7. In an aphanitic igneous rock can you make out the outlines of individual crystals with the naked eye? Yes or No 8. What type of igneous rock is the most volumetrically important on our planet? Intrusive Igneous Rocks 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments on Patterns of Alluvial Cover and Bedrock Erosion in a Meandering Channel Roberto Fernández1, Gary Parker1,2, Colin P
    Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2019-8 Manuscript under review for journal Earth Surf. Dynam. Discussion started: 27 February 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Experiments on patterns of alluvial cover and bedrock erosion in a meandering channel Roberto Fernández1, Gary Parker1,2, Colin P. Stark3 1Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at 5 Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA 2Department of Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA 3Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA Correspondence to: Roberto Fernández ([email protected]) Abstract. 10 In bedrock rivers, erosion by abrasion is driven by sediment particles that strike bare bedrock while traveling downstream with the flow. If the sediment particles settle and form an alluvial cover, this mode of erosion is impeded by the protection offered by the grains themselves. Channel erosion by abrasion is therefore related to the amount and pattern of alluvial cover, which are functions of sediment load and hydraulic conditions, and which in turn are functions of channel geometry, slope and sinuosity. This study presents the results of alluvial cover experiments conducted in a meandering channel flume of high fixed 15 sinuosity. Maps of quasi-instantaneous alluvial cover were generated from time-lapse imaging of flows under a range of below- capacity bedload conditions. These maps were used to infer patterns
    [Show full text]