DOCSLIB.ORG

Hoboken Public Schools

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hoboken Public Schools HOBOKEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 Hoboken, New Jersey COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT of the Hoboken School District Hoboken, New Jersey For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 Prepared by Business Office HOBOKEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal i-v Organizational Chart vi Roster of Officials vii Consultants and Advisors viii Certificates of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ix-xii FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 1-3 Management's Discussion and Analysis 4-16 Basic Financial Statements A. District-wide Financial Statements A-1 Statement of Net Position 17 A-2 Statement of Activities 18-19 B. Fond Financial Statements Governmental Funds B-1 Balance Sheet 20-21 B-2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 22 B-3 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances with the District-Wide Statements 23 Proprietary Funds B-4 Statement of Net Position 24 B-5 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 25 B-6 Statement of Cash Flows 26 Fiduciary Funds B-7 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 27 Notes to the Financial Statements 28-62 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION- PART II C. Budgetary Comparison Schedules C-1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule- General Fund 63-71 C-Ia Combining Budgetary Comparison Schedule- General Fund 72-79 C-2 Budgetary Comparison Schedule- Special Revenue Fund 80 HOBOKEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTES TO THE REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION- PART II C. Budgetary Comparison Schedules (Continued) C-3 Required Supplementary Information- Budgetary Comparison Schedule­ Notes to the Required Supplementary Information 81 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION -PART lll L. Schedules Related to Accounting and Reporting for Pensions (GASB 68) L-1 Required Supplementary Information- Schedule of the District's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability- Public Employees Retirement System 82 L-2 Required Supplementary Information- Schedule of District Contributions­ Public Employees Retirement System 83 L-3 Required Supplementary Information- Schedule of the District's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability- Teachers Pension and Annuity Fund 84 Notes to Required Supplementary Information 85 OTHER SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION D. School Level Schedules D-1 Combining Balance Sheet- General Fund 86 D-2 Statement of Expenditures Allocated by Resource Type- Actual­ Blended Resource Fund 15 87 D-3 Schedule of Blended Expenditures- Budget and Actual­ Blended Resource Fund 15 88-110 E. Special Revenue Fund E-1- E-1B Combining Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures Special Revenue Fund- Budgetary Basis 111-116 E-2 Preschool Education Program Aid Schedule of Expenditures­ Budgetary Basis 117 E-2a Early Childhood Program Aid Schedule of Expenditures­ Budgetary Basis 118 F. Capital Projects Fund F-1 Summary Statement of Project Expenditures 119 F-2 Summary Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance 120 F-2a Schedule of Project Revenues, Expenditures, Project Balance and F-2f Project Status- Budgetary Basis 121-127 G. Enterprise Fund G-1 Statement of Net Position 128 G-2 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position 129 G-3 Statement of Cash Flows 130 HOBOKEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS TABLE OF CONTENTS OTHER SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (Continued) H. Fiduciary Funds H-1 Combining Statement of Agency Assets and Liabilities 131 H-2 Combining Statements of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 132 H-3 Student Activity Agency Fund Schedule of Receipts and Disbursements 133 H-4 Payroll Agency Fund Schedule of Receipts and Disbursements 134 I. Long-Term Debt I-1 Schedule of Bonds Payable- Not Applicable 135 I-2 Schedule of Obligations Under Capital Leases/Lease Purchase Agreements 136 I-3 Schedule of Loans Payable- Not Applicable 137 I-4 Debt Service Fund- Budgetary Comparison- Not Applicable 138 J. STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited) J-1 Net Position by Component 139 J-2 Changes in Net Position 140-141 J-3 Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 142 J-4 Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 143 J-5 General Fund Other Local Revenue by Source 144 J-6 Assessed Value and Actual Value of Taxable Property 145 J-7 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates 146 J-8 Principal Property Taxpayers 147 J-9 Property Tax Levies and Collections 148 J-10 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 149 J-11 Ratios of Net General Bonded Debt Outstanding 150 J-12 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Bonded Debt 151 J-13 Legal Debt Margin Information 152 J-14 Demographic and Economic Statistics 153 J-15 Principal Employers 154 J-16 Full-Time Equivalent District Employees by Function/Program 155 J-17 Operating Statistics 156 J-18 School Building Information 157 J-19 Schedule of Required Maintenance for School Facilities 158 J-20 Schedule oflnsurance 159 HOBOKEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS TABLE OF CONTENTS K. SINGLE AUDIT SECTION K-1 Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards- Independent Auditor's Report 160-161 K-2 Report on Compliance for each Major Federal and State Program; Report on Internal Control Over Compliance; and Report on Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by U.S. Uniform Guidance and Schedule of Expenditures of State Financial Assistance Required by New Jersey OMB Circular 15-08- Independent Auditor's Report 162-164 K-3 Schedule of Expenditures ofFedera1 Awards 165-166 K-4 Schedule of Expenditures of State Financial Assistance 167-168 K-5 Notes to the Schedules of Expenditures of Federal Awards and State Financial Assistance 169-170 K-6 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 171-175 K-7 Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings 176 INTRODUCTORY SECTION HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATOR I BOARD SECRETARY 158 Fourth Street •!• Hoboken, NJ 07030 •!• 201.356.3610 •!• Fax: 201 .356.3642 William Moffitt Business Administrator I Board Secretary [email protected] 7 November 2016 Honorable President and Members of the Hoboken Board of Education County of Hudson, New Jersey Dear Board Members and Constituents of Hoboken: The comprehensive annual financial report of the Hoboken Board of Education (Board) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 is hereby submitted. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data and completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the management of the Board. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the data presented in this report is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner designed to present fairly the fmancial position and results of operations of the various funds of the Board. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the Boards' financial activities have been included. The comprehensive annual financial report is presented in four sections: introductory, financial, statistical and single audit. The introductory section includes this transmittal letter, the Board organizational chart and a list of principal officials. The financial section includes the District­ wide Statements as required by GASB 34, basic financial statements, schedules and footnotes as well as the auditor's report thereon. The statistical section includes selected financial and demographic information, generally presented on a multi-year basis. The Board is required to undergo an annual single audit in conformity with the provisions of the Single Audit Act of 1984 as amended by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996; U.S. Uniform Guidance, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards; and New Jersey OMB's Circular 15-08 OMB, Single Audit Policy for Recipients of Federal Grants, State Grants and State Aid. Information related to this single audit, including the auditor's reports covering compliance with applicable laws, regulations and requirements, and internal control over compliance and financial reporting, as well as a schedule of related fmdings, is included in the single audit section ofthis report. REPORTING ENTITY AND ITS SERVICES: The Hoboken Board of Education is an independent reporting entity within the criteria adopted by the Goverrunental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) as established by Statement No. 14. All funds and account groups of the Board are included in this report. The Hoboken Board of Education and all its schools constitute the Board's reporting entity. For the past five years the Board provided a full range of educational services appropriate to grade levels Pre-K through 12. These include regular and special education for handicapped youngsters. The Board completed the 2015-2016 fiscal year with an average daily enrollment of 1,934 students, which is 62 students above the previous year's average daily enrollment. The following details the changes in the student emollment of the District over the last five years. Where Students Come First i HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION FY2016 Audit Introduction 7 November 2016 Page2 Hoboken School District Average Daily Enrollment Last Five Years Student Percent Fiscal Year Enrollment Change 2015-2016 1,934 3.3% 2014-2015 1,872 (3.4%) 2013-2014 1,938 13.31% 2012-2013 1,710 (4.36%) 2011-2012 1,788 (1.5%) MAJOR INITIATIVES: The Hoboken Public School District continued to undertake a rigorous and comprehensive school improvement process designed to increase academic performance for all students. The district goals, budgeting process, technology program, educational materials selection processes, staff evaluation system, student performance assessment tools, curriculum revisions, facility improvements, and a variety of work in other areas is aligned in support of teaching, learning, and the new Common Core State Standards. New textbooks and professional activities continued districtwide as the district implemented changes related to the Common Core State Standards. A new language arts program and textbook was adopted for grades K-8 and continued to be implemented from the prior year.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hoboken Public Schools
    HOBOKEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 Hoboken, New Jersey COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT of the Hoboken School District Hoboken, New Jersey For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 Prepared by Business Office HOBOKEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal i-v Organizational Chart vi Roster of Officials vii Consultants and Advisors viii Certificates of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ix-xii FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 1-3 Management's Discussion and Analysis 4-16 Basic Financial Statements A. District-wide Financial Statements A-1 Statement of Net Position 17 A-2 Statement of Activities 18-19 B. Fond Financial Statements Governmental Funds B-1 Balance Sheet 20-21 B-2 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 22 B-3 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances with the District-Wide Statements 23 Proprietary Funds B-4 Statement of Net Position 24 B-5 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 25 B-6 Statement of Cash Flows 26 Fiduciary Funds B-7 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 27 Notes to the Financial Statements 28-62 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION- PART II C. Budgetary Comparison Schedules C-1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule- General Fund 63-71 C-Ia Combining Budgetary Comparison Schedule- General Fund 72-79 C-2 Budgetary Comparison Schedule- Special Revenue Fund 80 HOBOKEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTES TO THE REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION- PART II C. Budgetary Comparison Schedules (Continued) C-3 Required Supplementary Information- Budgetary Comparison Schedule­ Notes to the Required Supplementary Information 81 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION -PART lll L.
    [Show full text]
  • ESEA Waiver - School Profiles 2014
    ESEA Waiver - School Profiles 2014 17-0220-020 Bayonne Board of Education Bayonne High School This table presents the participation and performance determinations for this school under ESEA Flexibility. School Performance - English Language Arts Statewide Participation Rate - 95% Statewide Performance Goal - 90% # Enrolled % Not Met Total Valid % Target Met Subgroup Tested Participation Scores Proficient Performance Schoolwide 556 0.2 YES 520 93.5 90 MET GOAL White 276 0.0 YES 261 94.2 90 MET GOAL Black 53 0.0 YES 50 90.0 90 MET GOAL Hispanic 190 0.5 YES 176 92.6 90 MET GOAL American Indian 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 - - Asian 35 0.0 - 32 96.9 90 MET GOAL Two or More Races 2 0.0 - 1 100.0 - - Students with Disabilities 65 0.0 YES 60 66.7 79.2 NO Limited English Proficiency 22 0.0 - 11 36.4 - - Economically Disadvantaged 316 0.0 YES 293 89.7 90 YES* School Performance - Mathematics Statewide Participation Rate - 95% Statewide Performance Goal - 90% # Enrolled % Not Met Total Valid % Target Met Subgroup Tested Participation Scores Proficient Performance Schoolwide 556 0.2 YES 520 87.1 89.1 YES* White 276 0.0 YES 261 90.8 90 MET GOAL Black 53 0.0 YES 50 78.0 80.6 YES* Hispanic 190 0.5 YES 176 84.1 84.2 YES* American Indian 0 0.0 - 0 0.0 - - Asian 35 0.0 - 32 87.6 90 YES* Two or More Races 2 0.0 - 1 100.0 - - Students with Disabilities 65 0.0 YES 60 41.6 49.4 YES* Limited English Proficiency 22 0.0 - 11 54.5 - - Economically Disadvantaged 316 0.0 YES 293 83.2 87.9 NO Only Includes full year students for performance (Time In School < Year students are
    [Show full text]
  • ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets
    ESEA Waiver - Annual Progress Targets CDS CODE : 17-0220-020 DISTRICT : Bayonne Board of Education SCHOOL : Bayonne High School The tables represent the annual proficiency targets, established for this School under ESEA Waiver Schools and Subgroups could meet expectations either by meeting the statewide proficiency rate of 90 percent, or reaching their individually determined progress targets. The statewide proficiency rate will be increased to 95 percent in 2015. Performance Targets - Language Arts Literacy # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 526 95.2 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 White 275 96 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Black 50 96 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Hispanic 168 93.4 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 American Indian - - - 1011 - - - - - - Asian 32 96.9 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Two or More Races - - - 1011 - - - - - - Students with Disabilities 65 72.3 2.3 1011 74.6 76.9 79.2 81.5 83.8 86.1 Limited English Proficiency - - - 1011 - - - - - - Economically Disadvantaged 253 95.7 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Performance Targets - Mathematics # of Valid Baseline Yearly Baseline 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Subgroup Test Scores % Proficient Increment year Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Target (%P) Schoolwide 525 85.5 1.2 1011 86.7 87.9 89.1 90 90 90 White 274 90.5 - 1011 90 90 90 90 90 90 Black 50 74 2.2 1011
    [Show full text]
  • Intensive-Level Architectural Survey of the Hoboken Historic District City of Hoboken, Hudson County, New Jersey
    Intensive-Level Architectural Survey of the Hoboken Historic District City of Hoboken, Hudson County, New Jersey Final Report Prepared for: State of New Jersey Department of Treasury, Division of Property Management and Construction and New Jersey State Historic Preservation Office DPMC Contract #: P1187-00 April 26, 2019 Intensive-Level Architectural Survey of the Project number: DPMC Contract #: P1187-00 Hoboken Historic District Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Emily Paulus Everett Sophia Jones Daniel Eichinger Senior Preservation Planner Director of Historic Preservation Project Administrator Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 1 4/22/19 Draft revision Yes E. Everett Sr. Preservation Planner Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name 1 Yes NJ HPO 1 Yes City of Hoboken Prepared for: State of New Jersey Department of Treasury, Division of Property Management and Construction AECOM Intensive-Level Architectural Survey of the Project number: DPMC Contract #: P1187-00 Hoboken Historic District Prepared for: State of New Jersey Department of Treasury, Division of Property Management and Construction Erin Frederickson, Project Manager New Jersey Historic Preservation Office Department of Environmental Protection Mail Code 501-04B PO Box 420 501 E State Street Trenton, NJ 08625 Prepared by: Emily Paulus Everett, AICP Senior Preservation Planner Samuel A. Pickard Historian Samantha Kuntz, AICP Preservation Planner AECOM 437 High Street Burlington NJ, 08016
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Districts Using Teachscape Tools Contact Evan Erdberg, Director of North East Sales, for More Information. Email
    New Jersey Districts using Teachscape Tools Contact Evan Erdberg, Director of North East Sales, for more information. Email: [email protected] Mobile: 646.260.6931 ATLANTIC Atlantic County Institute of Technology Egg Harbor City Public School District Galloway Township Public Schools Mullica Township School District Richard Stockton College BERGEN Alpine School District Bergen County Special Services School District Bergen County Technical School District Bergenfield Public Schools Carlstadt East Rutherford Regional School District Carlstadt School District Cresskill School District Emerson School District Englewood Cliffs Public Schools Fort Lee Public Schools Glen Rock School District Hasbrouck Heights School District Leonia School District Maywood School District Midland Park School District New Milford School District Sage Day Schools South Bergen Jointure Commission Teaneck School District Tenafly Public Schools Wallington Public Schools Wood Ridge School District BURLINGTON Bass River Township School District Beverly City School District Bordentown Regional School District Delanco Township School District Delran Township School District Edgewater Park Township School District Evesham Township School District Mansfield Township School District Medford Lakes School District Palmyra Public Schools Pemberton Township School District Riverton School District Southampton Township Schools Springfield Township School District Tabernacle School District CAMDEN Camden Diocese Lindenwold School District Voorhees Township School District
    [Show full text]
  • Updated NJ Rankings.Xlsx
    New Jersey School Relative Efficiency Rankings ‐ Outcome = Student Growth 2012, 2013, 2014 (deviations from other schools in same county, controlling for staffing expenditure per pupil, economies of scale, grade range & student populations) 3 Year Panel Separate Yearly Model (Time Models (5yr Avg. Varying School School District School Grade Span Characteristics) Ranking 1 Characteristics) Ranking 2 ESSEX FELLS SCHOOL DISTRICT Essex Fells Elementary School PK‐06 2.92 23.44 1 Upper Township Upper Township Elementary School 03‐05 3.00 12.94 2 Millburn Township Schools Glenwood School KG‐05 2.19 62.69 3 Hopewell Valley Regional School District Toll Gate Grammar School KG‐05 2.09 10 2.66 4 Verona Public Schools Brookdale Avenue School KG‐04 2.33 42.66 5 Parsippany‐Troy Hills Township Schools Northvail Elementary School KG‐05 2.35 32.56 6 Fort Lee Public Schools School No. 1PK‐06 2.03 12 2.50 7 Ridgewood Public Schools Orchard Elementary School KG‐05 1.88 17 2.43 8 Discovery Charter School DISCOVERY CS 04‐08 0.89 213 2.42 9 Princeton Public Schools Community Park School KG‐05 1.70 32 2.35 10 Hopewell Valley Regional School District Hopewell Elementary School PK‐05 1.65 37 2.35 11 Cresskill Public School District Merritt Memorial PK‐05 1.69 33 2.33 12 West Orange Public Schools REDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL KG‐05 1.81 21 2.28 13 Millburn Township Schools South Mountain School PK‐05 1.93 14 2.25 14 THE NEWARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELLIOTT STREET ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PK‐04 2.15 82.25 15 PATERSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL 19 KG‐04 1.95 13 2.24 16 GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP
    [Show full text]
  • SEVP Approved Schools As of Monday, October 06, 2008 Institution Name Campus Name City/State Date Approved - 1 - 1St Choice International, Inc
    SEVP Approved Schools As of Monday, October 06, 2008 Institution Name Campus Name City/State Date Approved - 1 - 1st Choice International, Inc. 1st Choice International, Inc. Glenview, IL 10/29/2004 1st International Cosmetology School 1st International Cosmetology School Lynnwood, WA 11/5/2004 - A - A F International School of Languages Inc. A F International School of Languages In Thousand Oaks, CA 6/3/2003 A. T. Still University of Health Sciences Kirksville Coll of Osteopathic Medicine Kirksville, MO 3/10/2003 Aakers Business College Aakers Business College Fargo, ND 3/13/2003 ABC Beauty Academy, LLC ABC Beauty Academy Garland, TX 3/30/2006 Aberdeen Catholic School System Roncalli Aberdeen, SD 8/14/2003 Aberdeen School District 6-1 Aberdeen Central High School Aberdeen, SD 10/27/2004 Abiding Savior Lutheran School Abiding Savior Lutheran School Lake Forest, CA 4/16/2003 Abilene Christian Schools Abilene Christian Schools Abilene, TX 1/31/2003 Abilene Christian University Abilene Christian University Abilene, TX 2/5/2003 Abilene Independent School District Abilene Independent School District Abilene, TX 8/8/2004 Abington Friends School Abington Friends School Jenkintown, PA 7/15/2003 Above It All, Inc Benchmark Flight /Hawaii Flight Academy Kailua-Kona, HI 12/3/2003 Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College Tifton Campus Tifton, GA 1/10/2003 ABT Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis School ABT Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis School New York, NY 6/22/2006 Abundant Life Academy Kanab, UT 2/15/2008 Abundant Life Christian School Abundant Life Christian School Madison, WI 9/14/2004 Abundant Life School Sherwood, AR 10/25/2006 ABX Air, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Facilities: Improving Quality of Life
    49 IV Community Facilities: Improving Quality of Life Hoboken is graced with a number of historic Introduction community facilities buildings. The history of Hoboken as a City is tied to the history of its community and basic infrastructure. The sewers were the first to be built, as the Stevens family sold off its lots in the mid-1800s. While taken for granted now, the improvement to sani- tation brought by the sewers made bearable the density that has defined Hoboken ever since. Later, when Hoboken was coming of age as an industrial and trans- portation powerhouse, its community facilities were its public face. Constructed as much for their symbolic value as to fulfill practical needs, these structures were intended to give material form to the community’s aspirations for itself. Many of Hoboken’s public buildings that predate World War I, such as City Hall and the Demarest School, exhibit the massive proportions and fine detailing that city lead- ers during the period felt were essential to elevate the City’s public realm. The people who use Hoboken’s community facilities today have very different expectations of those facilities than residents did in the past. Where public bureau- cracies and buildings were once intended to inspire a sense of awe in the citizenry, today people expect openness, equal treatment, and a focus on customer service. Where infrastructure and waste collection were once kept out of sight, or at least out of mind, the new awareness of humanity’s relation to the environment means that utilities from trash removal to sewerage to electricity are coming under increased scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Follow up Response
    Department of Children & Families FY 2022 Assembly Budget Committee Follow-up Questions Assemblyman Spearman: Please specify the number of youth participants in each School Linked Services program in the current fiscal year. DCF Response: Information on various School Linked Services programs are noted in the following charts: • Family Friendly Centers (chart below) Level of Service Report Creation Date: 4/26/2021, 9:57:37 AM (PT) Gro up : Family Friendly Centers Report Period: 7/1/2020 to 4/26/2021 Participants 7/1/2020 - A g ency Pro g ram 4 / 2 6 / 2 0 2 1 ASPIRA, Inc. of New Jersey Brick Avon Academy 0 ASPIRA, Inc. of New Jersey Luis M unoz M arin 0 ASPIRA, Inc. of New Jersey M ichael C. Conti (Jersey City Public School) 0 AtlantiCare Behavioral Health Warren E. Sooy Jr. Elementary School 18 Catholic Charities Diocese of M etuchen Willow Grove School 0 Cherry Hill Public Schools Joyce Kilmer Elementary School 0 Cherry Hill Public Schools Thomas Paine Elementary School 0 Clayton Board of Education Herma Simmons Elementary School 20 Connection for Women and Families Brayton School 6 Connection for Women and Families Jefferson School 14 Connection for Women and Families Lincoln-Hubbard School 2 Connection for Women and Families Washington School 10 Hackensack Board of Education Jackson Avenue Elementary School 44 Harrison Board of Education Washington M iddle School 41 Hoboken Board of Education Thomas G. Connors Elementary School 0 Ironbound Community Corporation Hawkins Street School 0 Keansburg Board of Education Joseph C. Caruso Elementary School 12 La Casa de Don Pedro, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker.Weber.Njefficiency 8 2 16
    NEW JERSEY EDUCATION POLICY FORUM On the Relative Efficiency of New Jersey Public School Districts Research Note 2016-#2 Bruce D. Baker & Mark Weber 8/3/2016 Contrary to current political rhetoric, New Jersey’s least efficient producers of student achievement gains are not the state’s large former Abbott districts – largely poor urban districts that benefited most in terms of state aid increases resulting from decades of litigation over school funding equity and adequacy. While some Abbott districts such as Asbury Park and Hoboken rate poorly on estimates of relative efficiency, other relatively inefficient local public school districts include some of the state’s most affluent suburban districts and small, segregated shore towns. 1 | Page Comparing the Relative Efficiency of New Jersey Public School Districts Executive Summary Contrary to current political rhetoric, New Jersey’s least efficient producers of student achievement gains are not the state’s large former Abbott districts – largely poor urban districts that benefited most in terms of state aid increases resulting from decades of litigation over school funding equity and adequacy. While some Abbott districts such as Asbury Park and Hoboken rate poorly on estimates of relative efficiency, other relatively inefficient local public school districts include some of the state’s most affluent suburban districts and small, segregated shore towns. And yet these districts will be, in effect, rewarded under Governor Chris Christie’s “Fairness Formula,”1 even as equally inefficient but property-poor districts will lose state aid. Findings herein are consistent with previous findings in cost-efficiency literature and analyses specific to New Jersey: There exists some margin of additional inefficiency associated with Abbott status relative to non-Abbott districts in the same district factor group, but the margin of additional inefficiency in the poorest DFG is relatively small.
    [Show full text]
  • Year Charter School Renewal Application
    HCS Charter Renewal Pg. 1 The Hoboken Charter School 14th year Charter School Renewal Application October 15, 2011 Hoboken, NJ Copies of this report were transmitted to: Office of Charter Schools (OCS) Office of Education Hoboken District School System Office of the Hudson County Superintendent of Schools Draft 10/13/11 HCS Charter Renewal Pg. 2 Table of Contents 1. FIDELITY TO CHARTER 1.1 Mission and Vision ……………………………………. Pg. 3 1.2 Educational Program ………………………………….. Pg. 6 1.3 Non-Academic Goals …………………………………. Pg. 10 1.4 Community Engagement ……………………………… Pg. 11 2. DEMONSTRATION OF ACADEMIC SUCCESS 2.1 Statewide Assessments ………………………………... Pg. 15 2.2 Academic Goals ………………………………………. Pg. 25 2.3 Culture of High Student Achievement ………………... Pg. 33 3. ORGANIZATIONAL VIABILITY 3.1 Compliance ……………………………………………. Pg. 35 3.2 Governance and Administration ………………………. Pg. 36 3.3 Enrollment and Demographics ………………………... Pg. 37 3.4 Fiscal Solvency ……………………………………….. Pg. 41 3.5 Facilities ………………………………………………. Pg. 44 4. FIVE-YEAR PLANNING 4.1 Projected Enrollment ………………………………….. Pg. 45 4.2 Projected Plans ………………………………………... Pg. 46 HCS Charter Renewal Pg. 3 1. Fidelity to Charter 1.1 Describe the charter school’s mission and vision. 1.1 a) Brief description of the school School Name: Hoboken Charter School (HCS) Startup and Current Year: Hoboken Charter School was granted in 1997 and opened for the 1999 academic year. HCS is currently in its 14th year of operation. Address: The school occupies two buildings located at 713 Washington Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030 (K-8) and 4th and Garden Streets, 3rd Floor, Hoboken, NJ 07030 (9-12) Facility: The facility at 713 Washington Street houses grades K-8 and was purchased on August 11, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoboken Board of Education 11I5 Clinton Street, Hoboken, Nj 07030
    HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION 11I5 CLINTON STREET, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 AGENDA TUESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2012 7:00 PM PUBLIC MEETING Call to Order - Board Secretary Statement of Compliance – Open Public Meeting Act Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call OPEN PUBLIC MEETING STATEMENT: This meeting is being held in conformity to the Open Public Meetings Act N.J.S.A. 10:4-6 et. seq. Proper public notice of the meeting was published in the local papers on August 18 and August 19, 2012. If any Board member or member of the public in attendance believes that the meeting is in violation of the Open Public Meetings Act, the Hoboken Board of Education requests that they make a statement at this time. The Board wishes to make those in attendance aware that this meeting is being recorded on video and will be broadcast by the Board at a later date on CATV Channel 77. The Hoboken Board of Education is committed to preserving the decorum of the public process and is mindful that we live in the electronic age of computers, cell phones and other electronic communications devices. Nevertheless, we respectfully request that all meeting participants kindly silence their electronic devices during the course of the meeting, and if use of the device is necessary, we ask that you please leave the meeting room if you need to conduct personal business. SALUTE TO THE FLAG Page 1 HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION 11I5 CLINTON STREET, HOBOKEN, NJ 07030 AGENDA TUESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2012 ROLL CALL: PRESENT ABSENT COMMENT Biancamano, Peter Garcia, Carmelo Gold, Leon Markle, Rose Marie McAllister,
    [Show full text]