DOCSLIB.ORG

Pub 315 NY Blocked

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pub 315 NY Blocked COMMUNITY INDEX for the 2019 Pennsylvania Tourism and Transportation Map www.penndot.gov PUB 315 (6-16) COUNTY COUNTY SEAT COUNTY COUNTY SEAT Adams Gettysburg . .P-11 Lackawanna Scranton....................V-5 Allegheny Pittsburgh . .D-9 Lancaster Lancaster ..................S-10 Armstrong Kittanning . .E-7 Lawrence New Castle................B-6 Beaver Beaver . .B-8 Lebanon Lebanon ....................S-9 Bedford Bedford . .J-10 Lehigh Allentown...................W-8 Berks Reading . .U-9 Luzerne Wilkes-Barre..............U-6 Blair Hollidaysburg . .K-9 Lycoming Williamsport...............P-6 Bradford Towanda . .S-3 McKean Smethport..................K-3 Bucks Doylestown . .X-9 Mercer Mercer.......................C-6 Butler Butler . .D-7 Mifflin Lewistown .................N-8 Cambria Ebensburg . .J-9 Monroe Stroudsburg...............X-7 Cameron Emporium . .L-4 Montgomery Norristown.................W-10 Carbon Jim Thorpe . .V-7 Montour Danville .....................R-7 Centre Bellefonte . .M-7 Northampton Easton.......................X-8 Chester West Chester . .V-11 Northumberland Sunbury.....................Q-7 Clarion Clarion . .F-6 Perry New Bloomfield .........P-9 Clearfield Clearfield . .K-6 Philadelphia Philadelphia...............X-11 Clinton Lock Haven . .O-6 Pike Milford .......................Y-5 Columbia Bloomsburg . .S-6 Potter Coudersport ..............L-3 Crawford Meadville . .C-4 Schuylkill Pottsville....................T-8 Cumberland Carlisle . .P-10 Snyder Middleburg ................P-7 Dauphin Harrisburg . .Q-9 Somerset Somerset...................G-10 Delaware Media . .W-11 Sullivan Laporte......................S-5 Elk Ridgway . .J-5 Susquehanna Montrose ...................U-3 Erie Erie . .C-2 Tioga Wellsboro ..................O-4 Fayette Uniontown . .E-11 Union Lewisburg..................Q-7 Forest Tionesta . .F-5 Venango Franklin .....................D-5 Franklin Chambersburg . .N-11 Warren Warren ......................G-3 Fulton McConnellsburg . .M-11 Washington Washington ...............C-10 Greene Waynesburg . .C-11 Wayne Honesdale.................W-4 Huntingdon Huntingdon . .L-9 Westmoreland Greensburg ...............E-9 Indiana Indiana . .G-8 Wyoming Tunkhannock.............U-4 Jefferson Brookville . .G-6 York York ...........................R-11 Juniata Mifflintown . .O-8 This booklet is a complete index to the Tourism and Transportation Map of Pennsylvania. It lists all named places shown on the map, including communities shown on the enlargements. The letter-number combination following the community name may be used to locate the community on the map by means of the numbered and lettered coordinates along the edge of the map. Numbers that are preceded by the symbol # refer to the number of the enlargement map. 2 Aaronsburg - Beechwood PENNSYLVANIA A Andrews Settlement, Potter..............................M-3 B Angels, Wayne...................................................W-5 Aaronsburg, Centre,...........................................O-7 Baden, Beaver ....................................................C-8 Anita, Jefferson....................................................H-7 Abbottstown, Adams........................................Q-11 Baggaley, Westmoreland...................................F-9 Abington (Twp), Montgomery ............................#-8 Annandale, Butler ...............................................D-6 Bainbridge, Lancaster......................................R-10 Academy Corners, Tioga...................................O-3 Annville, Lebanon ...............................................R-9 Bairdford, Allegheny............................................D-8 Ackermanville, Northampton .............................X-7 Ansonia, Tioga....................................................O-4 Bakers Summit, Bedford....................................K-9 Acme, Westmoreland.......................................F-10 Ansonville, Clearfield ...........................................J-7 Bakerstown, Allegheny.......................................D-8 Adah, Fayette....................................................D-11 Antes Fort, Lycoming..........................................P-6 Barkersville, Somerset.....................................G-10 Adams, Armstrong..............................................E-7 Antrim, Tioga.......................................................O-4 Bakerton, Cambria...............................................J-8 Adamsburg, Westmoreland...............................E-9 Apollo, Armstrong................................................E-8 Bala-Cynwyd, Montgomery.................................#8 Adamstown, Lancaster/Berks..........................T-10 Appenzell, Monroe.............................................W-7 Bald Eagle, Blair ..................................................L-8 Adamsville, Crawford..........................................B-4 Applewold, Armstrong ........................................E-7 Baldwin, Allegheny..............................................D-9 Addison, Somerset ...........................................F-12 Aquashicola, Carbon ..........................................V-7 Baldwin(Twp), Allegheny......................................#9 Adrian, Armstrong ...............................................E-7 Arbuckle, Erie......................................................D-3 Ballietsville, Lehigh..............................................V-8 Aiken, McKean.....................................................J-3 Arcadia, Indiana..................................................H-7 Balls Mills, Lycoming...........................................P-5 Airville, York........................................................S-11 Archbald, Lackawanna.......................................V-5 Bally, Berks...........................................................V-9 Airydale, Huntingdon..........................................M-9 Arch Spring, Blair.................................................L-8 Bangor, Northampton.........................................X-7 Akeley, Warren....................................................G-3 Ardara, Westmoreland.........................................#9 Bannerville, Snyder ............................................O-8 Akron, Lancaster ...............................................T-10 Ardenheim, Huntingdon.....................................M-9 Barbours, Lycoming ...........................................Q-5 Alba, Bradford.....................................................Q-4 Ardmore, Montgomery/Delaware..................W-10 Bard, Bedford .....................................................J-11 Albany, Berks.......................................................U-8 Arendtsville, Adams..........................................O-11 Bareville, Lancaster...........................................T-10 Albert, Luzerne....................................................U-6 Argentine, Butler..................................................D-6 Barkeyville, Venango..........................................D-6 Albion, Erie...........................................................B-3 Aristes, Columbia................................................S-7 Barlow, Adams...................................................P-11 Albion, Jefferson..................................................H-7 Arlington, Wayne................................................W-5 Barnards, Armstrong..........................................G-7 Albrightsville, Carbon ..........................................V-6 Armagh, Indiana .................................................G-9 Barnes, Warren...................................................G-4 Alburtis, Lehigh....................................................V-8 Armbrust, Westmoreland.................................E-10 Barnesville, Schuylkill..........................................T-7 Alcoa Center, Westmoreland.............................E-8 Arnold, Westmoreland........................................D-8 Barneytown, Huntingdon...................................M-9 Aldan, Delaware....................................................#8 Arnot, Tioga..........................................................P-4 Barnsley, Chester..............................................U-11 Alden, Luzerne.....................................................T-6 Arona, Westmoreland.........................................E-9 Barree, Huntingdon.............................................L-8 Aldenville, Wayne...............................................W-4 Asbury, Erie............................................................#1 Barren Hill, Montgomery......................................#8 Aleppo (Twp), Allegheny......................................#9 Barrville, Mifflin.....................................................N-8 Ashfield, Carbon..................................................V-7 Aleppo, Greene.................................................B-11 Barto, Berks .........................................................V-9 Ashland, Clearfield..............................................K-7 Alexandria, Huntingdon ......................................L-8 Bartonsville, Monroe..........................................W-6 Ashland, Schuylkill/Columbia.............................S-7 Alfarata, Mifflin.....................................................O-8 Bastress, Lycoming.............................................P-6 Ashley, Luzerne...................................................U-6 Alinda, Perry........................................................O-9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • ORR Results Printout
    2008 Newport-Bermuda Race® FINAL RESULTS Scored Under ORR Class 1 St. David's Lighthouse Division Updated: 06/28/08 12:00 Cls Div Sail Yacht Design Captain(s) Yacht Yacht Finish Elapsed Corrected Pos Pos Number Name Model Name Club Status Date/Time ADT H M S H M S 1 1 USA-1818 SINN FEIN Cal 40 Peter S. Rebovich Sr. Raritan YC 6/24/08 22:43:57 104 43 57 61 06 38 2 2 USA-40808 SELKIE CTM 38 Sheila McCurdy CCA 6/24/08 20:41:48 102 41 48 62 10 18 3 5 USA-20621 EMILY Nielsen CTM 44 Edwin S Gaynor CCA 6/24/08 23:48:10 105 48 10 63 23 48 4 6 USA-754 WESTRAY Concordia Yawl John Melvin IHYC, NYYC 6/25/08 07:47:20 113 47 20 63 25 51 5 30 USA-3815 ACTAEA BDA 40 Michael M Cone CCA 6/25/08 10:36:13 116 36 13 67 18 14 6 43 USA-3519 WESTER TILL CTM A&R 48 Fred J Atkins EYC, NYYC 6/25/08 06:22:42 112 22 42 68 32 18 7 58 USA-2600 LIVELY LADY II Carter 37 William N Hubbard, III NYYC 6/25/08 13:08:55 119 08 55 70 04 55 8 59 NY-20 SIREN New York 32 Peter J Cassidy CCA 6/25/08 07:38:25 113 38 25 70 05 15 9 86 USA-32510 HIRO MARU Swan 43 Classic Hiroshi Nakajima Stamford YC 6/25/08 14:02:15 120 02 15 73 25 47 11 122 USA-844 PRIM MO Owens Cutter Henry Gibbons-Neff CCA RET 11 122 USA-913 SOLUTION CTM 50 Carter S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1835. EXECUTIVE. *L POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT
    1835. EXECUTIVE. *l POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT. Persons employed in the General Post Office, with the annual compensation of each. Where Compen­ Names. Offices. Born. sation. Dol. cts. Amos Kendall..., Postmaster General.... Mass. 6000 00 Charles K. Gardner Ass't P. M. Gen. 1st Div. N. Jersey250 0 00 SelahR. Hobbie.. Ass't P. M. Gen. 2d Div. N. York. 2500 00 P. S. Loughborough Chief Clerk Kentucky 1700 00 Robert Johnson. ., Accountant, 3d Division Penn 1400 00 CLERKS. Thomas B. Dyer... Principal Book Keeper Maryland 1400 00 Joseph W. Hand... Solicitor Conn 1400 00 John Suter Principal Pay Clerk. Maryland 1400 00 John McLeod Register's Office Scotland. 1200 00 William G. Eliot.. .Chie f Examiner Mass 1200 00 Michael T. Simpson Sup't Dead Letter OfficePen n 1200 00 David Saunders Chief Register Virginia.. 1200 00 Arthur Nelson Principal Clerk, N. Div.Marylan d 1200 00 Richard Dement Second Book Keeper.. do.. 1200 00 Josiah F.Caldwell.. Register's Office N. Jersey 1200 00 George L. Douglass Principal Clerk, S. Div.Kentucky -1200 00 Nicholas Tastet Bank Accountant Spain. 1200 00 Thomas Arbuckle.. Register's Office Ireland 1100 00 Samuel Fitzhugh.., do Maryland 1000 00 Wm. C,Lipscomb. do : for) Virginia. 1000 00 Thos. B. Addison. f Record Clerk con-> Maryland 1000 00 < routes and v....) Matthias Ross f. tracts, N. Div, N. Jersey1000 00 David Koones Dead Letter Office Maryland 1000 00 Presley Simpson... Examiner's Office Virginia- 1000 00 Grafton D. Hanson. Solicitor's Office.. Maryland 1000 00 Walter D. Addison. Recorder, Div. of Acc'ts do..
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychology Behind Jonestown: When Extreme Obedience and Conformity Collide Abstract 2
    THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND JONESTOWN 1 Anna Maria College The Psychology Behind Jonestown: When Extreme Obedience and Conformity Collide Submitted by: Claudia Daniela Luiz Author’s Note: This thesis was prepared by Law and Society and Psychology student, Claudia Daniela Luiz for HON 490, Honors Senior Seminar, taught by Dr. Bidwell and written under the supervision of Dr. Pratico, Psychology Professor and Head of the Psychology Department at Anna Maria College. RUNNING HEAD: THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND JONESTOWN 2 Abstract Notoriously throughout our history, cults of extremist religious views have made the headlines for a number of different crimes. Simply looking at instances like the Branch Davidians in Waco, or the members of the People’s Temple of Christ from Jonestown, it’s easy to see there is no lack of evidence as to the disastrous effects of what happens when these cults reach an extreme. When one person commits an atrocious crime, we can blame that person for their actions, but who do we blame when there’s 5 or even 900 people that commit a crime because they are so seemingly brainwashed by an individual that they’ll blindly follow and do whatever that individual says? Studying cases, like that of Jonestown and the People’s Temple of Christ, where extreme conformity and obedience have led to disastrous and catastrophic results is important because in the words of George Santayana “those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.” By studying and analyzing Jonestown and the mass suicide that occurred there, people can learn how Jim Jones was able to gain complete control of the minds of his over 900 followers and why exactly people began following him in the first.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania
    Elton 243 13A Road Ithaca Harford 36 54A 226 220 Dayton 390 14 79 11 41 80° 30’ 80° 15’ 80° 00’ 79° 45’ 79° 30’ Toll 79° 15’ 79° 00’ 78° 45’ 78° 30’Machias 78° 15’ 78° 00’ 77° 45’ 77° 30’ 77° 15’ 77° 00’ 76° 45’ 76° 30’ 76° 15’ 76° 00’ 75° 45’ 75° 30’ 75° 15’ 75° 00’ 74° 45’ 74° 30’ Houghton 53 414 5 38 21 Haskinville 327 26 A B C D E F G H J K 3 L M N 1 O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z To Buffalo East Otto Rushford Arkport Avoca 36 2 54 Hammondsport Caroline 219 Caneadea 3 96B Whitney 60 83 Hamlet South 62 243 Watkins 10 20 Cassadaga 240 98 Birdsall 10 415 37 13 79 Point 7 90 Dayton 16 2 86 35 7 Glen 3 Montour 228 THESE Bloomville Bear 322 5 Wesley Lake 41 12 TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION28 MAP Lakes 353 242 17 79 Barcelona Lake Belfast 3 Falls Danby Center Lisle Triangle 206 Unadilla Franklin Cassadaga 6 34 329 Newfield Lisle 60 Howard Richford 11 357 Tom Wolf, Governor 1 1 2 19 Bath Townsend 224 QUICK RESPONSE 8 Greene CoventryPA Sidney PA 5 5 3 33 Hornell 38 Sonora 29 34 2 Whitney Point 41 10 Westfield Charlotte Cattaraugus Franklinville Odessa 206 Stockton 9 96 Yassmin Gramian, P.E., Secretary, Department of Transportation Center Cherry Ashford Almond 4 30 9 Creek Angelica 32 Speedsville Itaska visitPA.com41 Bainbridge visitPA.com STATE 17 7 226 Monterey 414 CODES N 394 Leon 8 42 39 5 8 88 9 Delhi Forsyth 21 86 Willseyville ROAD CLASSIFICATION AND ROUTE MARKERS KEY TO MAP SYMBOLS 61 6 New 36 3 Beaver Dams 7 20 PARKSAlbion 5 Nanticoke TRAFFIC INTERCHANGES 28 ? Hartfield 27 353 31 Alfred Savona 16 CAN BE USEDJenksville Glen 7 PASSENGER RAILROADS
    [Show full text]
  • MECHANIC , CIIEMIST]T 1 A.ND MANUFACTURES
    /tWEEKLY JOURNA� PRACTIC L INFORMATION, ART, SCIENCE, MECHANIC�, CIIEMIST]t 1 A.ND OF. A � � MANUFACTURES. Vol. LIII.--No. 11. ] [$3.20 per AnnuDl.. [NEW SERlE'.] NEW YORK, SEPTEMBER 12, 1885. [POSTAGE PREPAID.] THE INTERNATIONAL YACHT RACE. quickly concluded that there was no centerboard sloop The great differences in width and draught of the Probably no former event in the history of yacht in this country of sufficient length to match against the two yachts at once mark the broad .distinction be­ racing has attracted so much attention as the trial Genesta, whereupon the flag officers of the New York tween the two classes of vessels, the Genesta being for the champiollship between British and American Club ordered such a one built, and about the same of the cutter, or "knife-blade," style, while center­ yachts in the vicinity of .New York during the week time some members of the Eastern Yacht Club also board sloops like the Puritan are sometimes styled 7. for the con- ordered another, both being centerboard sloops. Of in yachting vernacular" skimming dishes." commencing Sept. The arrangements . test were not made without a great deal of corre- these two yachts, the Puritan, of the Eastern Yacht The particulars of the Genesta's spars are given as spondence, extending through lllany months. The Club, was selected to sail against the Genesta. follows: Mast from deck to hounds, 52 feet; topmast race was for the possebsion of the prize cup won by the I The Puritan is of wood, and was built at South from fid to sheave, 47 feet; extreme boom, 70 feet; gaff, yacht America, in a contest with a fleet of British Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Luzerne County Act 167 Phase II Stormwater Management Plan
    Executive Summary Luzerne County Act 167 Phase II Stormwater Management Plan 613 Baltimore Drive, Suite 300 Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702 Voice: 570.821.1999 Fax: 570.821.1990 www.borton-lawson.com 3893 Adler Place, Suite 100 Bethlehem, PA 18017 Voice: 484.821.0470 Fax: 484.821.0474 Submitted to: Luzerne County Planning Commission 200 North River Street Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711 June 30, 2010 Project Number: 2008-2426-00 LUZERNE COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – INTRODUCTION 1. Introduction This Stormwater Management Plan has been developed for Luzerne County, Pennsylvania to comply with the requirements of the 1978 Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Act, Act 167. This Plan is the initial county-wide Stormwater Management Plan for Luzerne County, and serves as a Plan Update for the portions or all of six (6) watershed-based previously approved Act 167 Plans including: Bowman’s Creek (portion located in Luzerne County), Lackawanna River (portion located in Luzerne County), Mill Creek, Solomon’s Creek, Toby Creek, and Wapwallopen Creek. This report is developed to document the reasoning, methodologies, and requirements necessary to implement the Plan. The Plan covers legal, engineering, and municipal government topics which, combined, form the basis for implementation of a Stormwater Management Plan. It is the responsibility of the individual municipalities located within the County to adopt this Plan and the associated Ordinance to provide a consistent methodology for the management of stormwater throughout the County. The Plan was managed and administered by the Luzerne County Planning Commission in consultation with Borton-Lawson, Inc. The Luzerne County Planning Commission Project Manager was Nancy Snee.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Pennsylvania's Northern Tier the Wellsboro District
    Central Pennsylvania's Northern Tier The Wellsboro District The Genesee Conference was formed in 1810 by Bishops Asbury and McKendree in accordance with discretionary authority granted them by the 1808 General Conference. The conference was created from the Cayuga (western New York state) and Upper Canada (southern Ontario) districts of the New York Conference and the Susquehanna (north central Pennsylvania) district of the Philadelphia Conference. More specifically, the Susquehanna district included all Pennsylvania drained by the Susquehanna River above its junction with the Juniata River. The General Conference of 1820 transferred the Bald Eagle, Lycoming, Northumberland and Shamokin circuits to the Baltimore Conference. Peck's 1860 history of the Genesee Conference, page 339, describes that event as follows: The large tract extending from the mouth of the Juniata up to Wyoming on the north branch of the Susquehanna, and embracing Buffalo Valley, Penn's Valley, the Bald Eagle country, and the valley of the west branch, was taken from the Genesee Conference without its consent, and attached to the Baltimore Conference. We doubt if there has ever been such a case in the history of Methodism, and there certainly has been nothing like it since 1820. When large portions of annual conferences are detached it has always been done by the concurrence of the conference. It was a matter of no special importance at that time to the Genesee Conference, for she had territory enough, and too much. In addition to the territory now contained in five annual conferences, she had both provinces of Canada under her supervision, and little reason for instituting a quarrel about four circuits on her southern wing.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • Our Thirtieth Ye
    Our Thirtieth Yea r w w w.lymanmorse.com • 207-354-6904 HOB NOB - Seguin 44 HODIMAR L to R:Rod Stephens,Cabot, BLUE DOLPHIN – Don Kipp Hull #1 Russ Goldsmith Goldsmiths Th i rt y Yea r s of Bui l d i n g In 1978 the old Morse Boat- from Neil Bond and Frank Simon cruising boats in history and building Company was closing, we started development and we were proud to be part of it. but when I approached Roger planning for the Lyman-Morse Hinckley, Cambria, Little Harbor Morse about renting the old Seguin 44 series. and Alden were all successfully building I found that he had Fortunately, we hit the mar- building high-end 44’s that were already contracted with Clayton ket at just the right time as the all exceptionally well rounded Ewing and Porter Schutt cruiser/racers. to finish their Jarvis Although the plan ”The era starting from Newman 46 hulls using was for Neil and Frank that facility. With Roger’s to build a 44 for them- the late 70’s to the encouragement I contact- selves, they never did, ed Clayton and Porter to but given their faith in discuss my plans, and us, as well as financial mid 80’s produced with agreement from all support, we were still parties proceeded to pur- able to launch the chase the land and build- project. Our hard work some of the finest ings, and assume the con- soon paid off when tracts to build DYNA and Mitch Neff from EGRET.
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]