The Metropolitan Plan Appendices

Metropolitan Plan for 2036 | PAGE 245 APPENDIX 1 National Objective and Criteria for Future Strategic Planning of Capital Cities

Objective To ensure Australian cities are globally competitive, productive, sustainable, liveable and socially inclusive and are well placed to meet future challenges and growth. Criteria Capital city strategic planning systems should:

1. be integrated: 5. consider and strengthen the networks between a) across functions, including land–use capital cities and major regional centres, and and transport planning, economic and other important domestic and international infrastructure development, environmental connections assessment and urban development, and b) across government agencies 6. provide for planned, sequenced and evidence– based land release and an appropriate balance of 2. provide for a consistent hierarchy of future infill and greenfields development oriented and publicly available plans, including: a) long term (for example, 15—30 year) 7. clearly identify priorities for investment and integrated strategic plans policy effort by governments, and provide an b) medium term (for example, 5—15 year) effective framework for private sector investment prioritised infrastructure and land–use and innovation plans, and c) near–term prioritised infrastructure project 8. encourage world–class urban design and pipeline backed by appropriately detailed architecture, and project plans 9. provide effective implementation arrangements 3. provide for nationally–significant economic and supporting mechanisms, including: infrastructure (both new and upgrade of existing) a) clear accountabilities, timelines and including: appropriate performance measures a) transport corridors b) coordination between all three levels b) international gateways of government, with opportunities for c) intermodal connections Commonwealth and Local Government d) major communications and utilities input, and linked, streamlined and efficient infrastructure, and approval processes including under the e) reservation of appropriate lands to support Commonwealth Environment Protection and future expansion Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 c) evaluation and review cycles that support 4. address nationally–significant policy issues the need for balance between flexibility including: and certainty, including trigger points a) population growth and demographic change that identify the need for change in policy b) productivity and global competitiveness settings, and c) climate change mitigation and adaptation d) appropriate consultation and engagement d) efficient development and use of existing and with external stakeholders, experts and the new infrastructure and other public assets wider community e) connectivity of people to jobs and businesses to markets f) development of major urban corridors g) social inclusion h) health, liveability, and community wellbeing i) housing affordability, and j) matters of national environmental significance

PAGE 246 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 APPENDIX 2 MEASURING PERFORMANCE

Key Aims of the Metropolitan Plan

The Metropolitan Plan will follow on from the Metropolitan Strategy: A City of Cities, 2005 by measuring progress across the five aims of liveability, economic competitiveness, fairness, environmental protection and governance.

Aim Measure Benchmark (2005) Benchmark (2010) Enhance Quality of Living In 2005, Sydney ranked 8th In 2010, Sydney ranked 10th Liveability Maintain or improve Sydney’s of 260 cities in the Quality of of 221 cities in the Quality of index and ranking of quality of Living Survey with an index Living Survey with an index living, according to the Mercer score of 105 of 106.3 Human Resource Consulting global quality of living survey

Strength Contribution to In 1998–1999, Sydney In 2009, Sydney’s contribution Economic National Economy produced 23% of ’s to national GDP had increased Competitiveness Maintain or increase the value added wealth, totalling to 24.9% proportion and value of $130 billion Sydney’s contribution to GDP

Ensure Access to Services In 2005, 75% of Sydney’s In 2010, 77% of Sydney’s Fairness Increase the percentage of residents could access a major residents can access a major the population living within 30 centre, regional city or Global centre, regional city or Global minutes by public transport of Sydney within 30 minutes by Sydney within 30 minutes by a city or major centre public transport (adjusted) public transport

Protect the Environmental Footprint From 1994 to 1999, Sydney’s From 1999 to 2004, Environment No increase in Sydney’s environmental footprint Sydney’s environment environmental footprint per increased by 16% to 6.78 footprint increased 6% to 7.21 capita hectares per person hectares per person (adjusted)

Improve Metropolitan Strategy Budget Paper 4 responds to The Metropolitan Plan Governance and Infrastructure transport and infrastructure integrates land use, transport Metropolitan Strategy priorities as identified in the and infrastructure. It prioritises directions and identified State Infrastructure Strategy infrastructure investment and transport and infrastructure guarantees 10 year funding needs to inform the annual for transport projects. This State Infrastructure Strategy is reflected in theState Infrastructure Strategy and Budgets

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 247 The Metropolitan Plan’s Strategic Directions Performance Measures The performance of the Metropolitan Plan will be monitored annually against each of the performance measures which test the strategic directions,

However some measures are only able to be measured every five years, coinciding with the Census cycle.

Key Strategic Direction Key performance indicator Key performance measures

STRATEGIC DIRECTION A 1. Maintain or improve the ranking of Sydney In 2010 Sydney ranked: Strengthening across the three main comprehensive global —9th in the Global City Index a city of cities city indicator surveys: —7th in the Cities of Opportunity —Global City Index (AT Kearney, Foreign Policy —10th in the Global City Power Index Magazine and Chicago Council on Global Affairs) —Cities of Opportunity (PricewaterhouseCoopers); and —Global Power City Index (Mori Foundation) 2. Increase actual job growth in Regional Cities Between 2001 and 2006 jobs in: of Parramatta, Penrith, Liverpool and Central —Central Sydney increased from Sydney and North Sydney 333,600 jobs to 358,300 jobs (7.4%) —North Sydney decreased slightly from 47,400 jobs to 47,200 jobs (–0.4%) —Parramatta increased from 40,800 jobs to 43,200 jobs (5.9%) —Penrith increased from 19,100 to 20,000 jobs (4.7%) —Liverpool increased from 15,300 to 15,800 jobs (3.3%) Source: Bureau of Transport Statistics (BTS), ABS Census and Employment Lands Data Program, measured 5–yearly.

3. Increase proportion of job growth in In 2006 total jobs in: Regional Cities of Parramatta, Penrith, —Parramatta represented 2.2% of jobs in the Liverpool in relation to total jobs in Sydney Sydney Metropolitan Area metropolitan area —Penrith represented 1% of jobs in the Sydney Metropolitan Area —Liverpool represented 0.8% of jobs in the Sydney Metropolitan Area Source: Bureau of Transport Statistics, ABS Census and Employment Lands Data Program, measured 5–yearly.

STRATEGIC DIRECTION B 4. Location of new housing: 80% of all new In the ten years to 2008–09, 61% of new Strengthening and housing within the walking catchment (as dwellings in the Sydney Region were located renewing centres defined in Appendix 4 of Metropolitan Plan) within the walking catchment of a centre. of an existing or planned centre SOURCE: Metropolitan Development Program (MDP), NSW Department of Planning

STRATEGIC DIRECTION C 5. Increase the percentage of the population In 2010, 77% of people in Metropolitan Transport for living within 30 minutes by public transport of Sydney lived within 30 minutes by public a connected city a city or major centre in Metropolitan Sydney transport from a city or major centre. Source: BTS, ABS Census 6. Increase the proportion of total journeys In 2008–09, the proportion of journey to work to work by public transport in the Sydney trips by public transport in Sydney was 23.9%. Metropolitan Area Source: BTS 7. Increase the share of commute trips made by In 2008–09, public transport trips during peak public transport during peak hour to and from: hour to and from: —Sydney CBD —Sydney CBD: 75% —Parramatta CBD —Parramatta CBD: 39% —Liverpool CBD —Liverpool CBD: 15% —Penrith CBD —Penrith CBD:21% Source: BTS

PAGE 248 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 Key Strategic Direction Key performance indicator Key performance measures

STRATEGIC DIRECTION D 8. Ensure at least 70% of new housing will be Over the last five years to 2008–09, 84% of new Housing Sydney’s located in existing urban areas and up to 30% housing was built in existing urban areas and Population in greenfield locations 16% were built in greenfield areas. Source: Annual MDP Report, NSW Department of Planning 9. Ensure housing production is contributing to Dwelling production between July 2006 to subregional housing targets (base date 2006) July 2009 for each subregion is: —Sydney City: 4,434 —East: 3,205 —South: 4,074 —Inner West: 3,406 —Inner North: 2,157 —North: 2,880 —North East: 2,124 —West Central: 7,518 —North West: 7,491 —South West: 4,147 —Central Coast: 2,611

Source: Annual MDP Report, NSW Department of Planning 10. Measure progress in ensuring planned At July 2010, the capacity of greenfield locations capacity to deliver 770,000 new dwellings identified for future urban development was including at least 539,000 in existing urban over 250,000 dwellings. This land is located in areas and up to 231,000 in greenfield the Growth Centres, the North Wyong Structure locations, including the Central Coast (base Plan Area and MDP release areas. date 2006) Source: Annual MDP Report, Department of Planning 43 Metropolitan comprehensive Local Environmental Plans to deliver the local housing capacity targets required under the Metropolitan Plan at first opportunity following finalisation of subregional strategies under that Plan. Source: NSW Department of Planning 11. Ensure an increase in the mix of all housing In 2006 total housing stock in the Sydney types across the Sydney Metropolitan Area Region was made up of: —61% separate houses —12% semi–detached, terrace and townhouses —27% flats, units and apartments Source: ABS Census Household Survey (5 yearly)

Over the last five years to 2008–09, 75% of new dwellings in the Sydney Region were multi–unit dwellings. Source: Annual MDP Report, NSW Department of Planning

In 2009–10 building approvals across Sydney included 7,322 houses, 3,305 semi–detached, 2,795 flats up to 3 storeys and 4,778 flats 4+ storeys. Across the subregions building approvals comprised the following housing mix:

% % Semi– % Flat up to Flat 4+ SUBREGION House detached 3 storeys storeys %

Sydney City 5 7 2 86

East 30 14 11 45

South 28 16 29 27

Inner West 12 4 18 66

Inner North 36 11 11 42

North 31 9 7 53

North East 49 7 29 15

West Central 28 31 20 21

North West 68 19 9 4

South West 63 17 9 11

Source: ABS Building Approvals Data

12. Improve housing affordability In Sydney in 2007–8 26.4% of homes sold were affordable by very low, low and moderate income households. Source: Valuer General, ABS Survey of Income and Housing 2007–08 13. Reduce the trend of growing average size of The average floor area in 2009–10 new residen- new homes in the Sydney metropolitan area tial dwellings of all types was 260.9 m2. The aver- age floor area of detached houses was 297.5 m2. Source: ABS Building Approvals Data

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 249 Key Strategic Direction Key performance indicator Key performance measures

STRATEGIC DIRECTION E 14. Maintain or increase availability of jobs In 2006 the proportion of jobs per working age Growing within each subregion, particularly in the population in each Subregion: Sydney’s West Central and South West Subregions —Sydney City: 4.93 Economy —Inner North: 1.55 —West Central: 1.15 —East: 1 —Inner West: 0.88 —North East: 0.76 —North West: 0.73 —South West: 0.72 —North: 0.66 —South: 0.63 Source: BTS, ABS Census and ELDP, measured 5 yearly 15. Increase the proportion of freight In 2008–09, the proportion of container freight movement by rail out of moved by rail out of Port Botany increased to 22.9%. Source: Sydney Ports Corporation 16. Reduce vehicle congestion in Sydney In 2005 the cost of congestion to Sydney was $3.5 Billion. Source: BITRE and BTS 17. Increase area of zoned and serviced In 2010, stocks of employment lands are: Employment Lands available —3575 ha of undeveloped zoned land not serviced —903 ha of undeveloped zoned and serviced land Source: Employment Lands Data Program, NSW Department of Planning 18. Increase proportion of job growth Between 2001 and 2006 jobs, increased/ in Strategic Centres decreased by (indicated in brackets): —Macquarie Park (25.8%) —St Leonards (0.6%) —Olympics Park–Rhodes (61.5%) —Port Botany and Environs (11.7%) —Sydney Airport and Environs (6.8%) —Randwick Education and Health (21.9%) —Westmead (2.9%) —Bankstown Airport–Milperra (–1.2%) —Norwest (174%) —Bankstown (–5.0%) — (18.8%) —Bondi Junction (14%) —Burwood (–3.2%) —Campbelltown–Macarthur (36%) —Castle Hill (2.5%) —Chatswood (–0.5%) —Brookvale–Dee Why (16.5%) —Hornsby (–17%) —Hurstville (–5%) —Kogarah (2.1%) Refer Performance measure 2. for Regional Cities Source: BTS, ABS Census and Employment Lands Data Program, measured 5 yearly 19. Plan for adequate capacity for employment Employment Lands Development Program —760,000 new jobs including 375,500 in measurements. strategic centres, including Central Coast (base year 2006) Measure the progress of gazettal of 43 Metropolitan comprehensive Local Environmental Plans to deliver the employment lands required under the Metropolitan Plan. Source: Employment Lands Data Program and NSW Department of Planning

STRATEGIC DIRECTION F 20. Contain Sydney’s urban footprint From 2010, measure the urban release areas Balancing Land outside of the existing and identified urban Uses on the Fringe footprint (refer Figure F1 in Balancing Land Uses on the Fringe) Source: NSW Department of Planning 21. Grow the value of Sydney’s In 2006, the value of agricultural production in agricultural industry the Sydney Basin was $630 million. Source: ABS Census Data, measured 5 yearly

PAGE 250 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 Key Strategic Direction Key performance indicator Key performance measures

STRATEGIC DIRECTION G 22. Measure overall energy and greenhouse gas Currently not reported Tackling Climate emission savings through the application of Change and Sustainability Guidelines for major projects Source: NSW Department of Planning Protecting in Sydney Sydney’s Natural 24. Reduction in per capita ecological In 2003–2004, the ecological footprint per Environment footprint for Sydney metropolitan area capita for Sydney was 7.21 hectares.

Source: State of Environment Report, DECCW, measured every three years 25. Decrease rate of per capita growth of Between 2001–02 and 2008–09, vehicle Vehicle Kilometres Travelled (VKT) kilometres travelled in the Sydney metropolitan in the Sydney metropolitan area area has grown at an annual rate of 0.6 per cent. Source: BTS, Household Travel Survey

STRATEGIC DIRECTION H 26. Increase the proportion of average In 2008–9 in the Sydney metropolitan area, 0.6% Achieving Equity, weekly trips made by bicycle of average weekly trips were made by bicycle Liveability and Source: BTS, Household Travel Survey Social Inclusion 27. Increase the proportion of social/ In 2008–9 in the Sydney metropolitan area, recreational trips made by walking 29% of all social/recreational trips were made by walking

Source: BTS, Household Travel Survey 28. Increase participation at cultural venues In 2005–6 in Sydney 2.87 million persons aged and events over 15 years old attended at least one cultural venue or event

Source: ABS 4114.0 Attendance at Selected Cultural Venues and Events (State Tables) 29. Increase involvement in organised As of April 2007 22.6% of persons aged over 15 sport and physical activity years old in Sydney were involved in organised sport and physical activity

Source: ABS 6285.0 Involvement in Organised Sport and Physical Activity, Australia, Apr 2007

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 251 APPENDIX 3 NSW State Plan Priorities and Metropolitan Plan Objectives

State Plan Priority State Plan Target Metropolitan Plan Objectives Better transport and liveable cities Improve the Increase the share of commute trips C. Transport for a connected city public transport made by public transport: Objective C1: To enhance our transport system through system —To and from Sydney CBD during implementation of the Metropolitan Transport Plan peak hours to 80% by 2016 Objective C4: To ensure that our key centres are accessible —To and from Parramatta CBD during and connected peak hours to 50% by 2016 Objective C6: To ensure transport corridors are preserved —To and from Liverpool CBD during for future growth peak hours to 20% by 2016 —To and from Penrith CBD during B. Growing and renewing centres peak hours to 25% by 2016 Objective B1: To focus activity in accessible centres Increase the proportion of total F. Balancing Land Uses on the Fringe journeys to work by public transport Objective F1: To contain Sydney’s urban footprint in the Sydney Metropolitan Region to 28% by 2016 Provide reliable Consistently meet public transport C. Transport for a connected city public transport reliability targets: Objective C2: To build on Sydney’s strengths by further • Trains—92% of City Rail trains run on integrating transport and land use planning and decision– time across the network making to support increased public transport mode share • Buses—95% of Sydney buses run on Objective C5: To improve the passenger experience time across the network of public transport and promote active transport • Ferries—99.5% of run opportunities on time Improve the road Increase the proportion of container C. Transport for a connected city network freight movement by rail out of Port Objective C1: To enhance our transport system through Botany to 40% by 2016 implementation of the Metropolitan Transport Plan Objective C3: To ensure a transport system that supports productivity through access to jobs, the efficient movement of freight and effective economic gateways Objective C6: To ensure transport corridors are preserved for future growth E. Growing Sydney’s economy Objective E6 To support Sydney’s nationally significant economic gateways Maintain road Improve the quality (smoothness) C. Transport for a connected city infrastructure for urban and rural State roads, so Objective C5: To improve the passenger experience that 93% of roads meet the national of public transport and promote active transport standard by 2016 opportunities Increase use Increase the mode share of bicycle C. Transport for a connected city of walking and trips made in the Greater Sydney Objective C5: To improve the passenger experience cycling region, at a local and district level, of public transport and promote active transport to 5% by 2016 opportunities Increase the Increase the percentage of the B. Growing and renewing centres number of jobs population living within 30 minutes Objective B1: To focus activity in accessible centres closer to home by public transport of a city or major centre in Metropolitan Sydney C. Transport for a connected city Objective C1: To enhance our transport system through implementation of the Metropolitan Transport Plan Objective C4: To ensure that our key centres are accessible and connected F. Balancing Land Uses on the Fringe Objective F1: To contain Sydney’s urban footprint

PAGE 252 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 State Plan Priority State Plan Target Metropolitan Plan Objectives Grow cities Maintain or improve the ranking A. Strengthening a City of Cities and centres as of our cities and regional towns in Objective A6: To strengthen Sydney’s position as a functional and ‘quality of life’ surveys contemporary, global tourism destination Objective A7: To ensure Sydney continues to support major attractive places events in iconic locations, and remains competitive in the to live, work global event and convention market and visit H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion Objective H3: To provide healthy, safe and inclusive places based on active transport Improve housing Increase the supply of affordable D. Housing Sydney’s population affordability housing for low and moderate income Objective D3: To improve housing affordability households In the Sydney Metropolitan Region D. Housing Sydney’s population and the Central Coast: Objective D1: To ensure an adequate supply of land and sites for residential development Provide capacity for 640,000 new dwellings between 2004 and 2031 including 445,000 in existing urban areas and the remaining 195,000 in greenfield locations In the Sydney Metropolitan Region D. Housing Sydney’s population and the Central Coast: Objective D1: To ensure an adequate supply of land and sites for residential development Achieve stocks of land zoned and serviced with trunk infrastructure with I. Delivering the Plan potential for development of 55,000 Objective I2: To develop strongly integrated land use and dwellings infrastructure planning processes Supporting business and jobs Maintain Maintain our average annual capital A. Strengthening a City of Cities and invest in expenditure growth of 4.6% nominal Objective A8: To plan and coordinate delivery of infrastructure to 2015—16 infrastructure to meet metropolitan housing and employment growth targets Objective A9: To support, protect and enhance nationally and internationally significant infrastructure in the metropolitan area C. Transport for a connected city Objective C1: To enhance our transport system through implementation of the Metropolitan Transport Plan I. Delivering the Plan Objective I2: To develop strongly integrated land use and infrastructure planning processes Increase business Double new business investment from A. Strengthening a City of Cities investment and around $40 billion in 2006 to around Objective A4:To continue strengthening Sydney’s capacity support jobs $80 billion a year in 2016 to attract and retain global businesses and investment E. Growing Sydney’s economy Objective E1: To ensure adequate land supply for economic activity, investment and jobs in the right locations Objective E2: To focus Sydney’s economic growth and renewal, employment and education in centres Increase tourism in NSW to 160.6 A. Strengthening a City of Cities million visitor nights and increase Objective A6: To strengthen Sydney’s position as a expenditure to $19.2 billion, by contemporary, global tourism destination 2015—16 Speed up Meet planning benchmarks for I. Delivering the Plan planning decisions timely processing of major project Objective I6: To streamline the land release process determinations and planning proposals Drive innovation Grow the proportion of innovative A. Strengthening a City of Cities to grow NSW businesses by 25% by 2016 Objective A4:To continue strengthening Sydney’s capacity productivity to attract and retain global businesses and investment E. Growing Sydney’s economy Objective E1: To ensure adequate land supply for economic activity, investment and jobs in the right locations Objective E2: To focus Sydney’s economic growth and renewal, employment and education in centres Objective E5: To Increase and diversify the jobs and skills base of Western Sydney

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 253 State Plan Priority State Plan Target Metropolitan Plan Objectives Clever State Improve access to 4,000 new apprenticeships and 2,000 E. Growing Sydney’s economy jobs and training new cadetships by 2012 Objective E2: To focus Sydney’s economic growth and renewal, employment and education in centres Objective E5: To Increase and diversify the jobs and skills base of Western Sydney Increase access Facilitate an increase in expenditure A. Strengthening a City of Cities to knowledge on research and development in NSW Objective A4:To continue strengthening Sydney’s capacity and skills in by at least 12% on average per annum to attract and retain global businesses and investment until 2016 partnership with E. Growing Sydney’s economy Universities Objective E2: To focus Sydney’s economic growth and renewal, employment and education in centres Objective E5: To Increase and diversify the jobs and skills base of Western Sydney Healthy Communities Promote healthy Reduce the percentage of children H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion lifestyles who are overweight and obese to 25% Objective H2: To ensure appropriate social infrastructure by 2010 and to 22% by 2016 and services are located near transport, jobs and housing Objective H3: To provide healthy, safe and inclusive places based on active transport Reduce H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion potentially Objective H3: To provide healthy, safe and inclusive places preventable based on active transport hospital admissions Green State Tackle climate Achieve a 60% cut in greenhouse gas G. Tackling Climate Change and Protecting Sydney’s change emissions by 2050 in line with the Natural Environment Federal Government targets Objective G1: To reduce Sydney’s greenhouse gas Develop a clean emissions energy future Achieve 20% renewable energy Objective G3: To integrate environmental targets into land consumption by 2020 in light of the use planning Federal Government’s expanded Renewable Energy Target Implement 4,000 GWh of annual electricity consumption savings through NSW energy efficiency programs by 2014 Secure sustainable Increase water recycling from 15 G. Tackling Climate Change and Protecting Sydney’s supplies of water billion litres per year in 2005 to 70 Natural Environment and use our water billion litres of water per year by 2015 Objective G5: To achieve sustainable water use more wisely Save 145 billion litres of water per year by 2015, representing almost a 25% reduction from Sydney’s projected water demand in that year Protect our Meet our State–wide targets for G. Tackling Climate Change and Protecting Sydney’s native vegetation, natural resource management to Natural Environment biodiversity, land, improve biodiversity and native Objective G4: To improve the health of waterways, coasts vegetation, sensitive riverine and and estuaries rivers and coastal coastal ecosystems, soil condition and Objective G6: To protect Sydney’s unique diversity of waterways socio–economic wellbeing plants and animals Improve air Meet national air quality goals (as G. Tackling Climate Change and Protecting Sydney’s quality specified in the National Environment Natural Environment Protection Measure for Ambient Air Objective G7: To improve Sydney’s air quality Quality) Reduce waste Meet the 2014 NSW waste recycling G. Tackling Climate Change and Protecting Sydney’s targets (as specified in the NS W Natural Environment Waste Avoidance and Resource Objective G9: To minimise and recycle waste Recovery Strategy)

PAGE 254 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 State Plan Priority State Plan Target Metropolitan Plan Objectives Stronger communities Improve child Children and young people in NSW, H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion wellbeing, health along with their families, have access Objective H2: To ensure appropriate social infrastructure and safety to appropriate and responsive and services are located near transport, jobs and housing services when needed Strengthen Close the Aboriginal life expectancy B. Growing and renewing centres Aboriginal gap within a generation Objective B3 To plan for new centres, and instigate a Communities program for high quality urban renewal in existing centres Halve the gap in Aboriginal serviced by public transport employment outcomes within a decade H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion Objective H1: To ensure equity, liveability and social inclusion are integrated into plan making and planning decision making Reduce the A 7% reduction in the overall level of H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion number of NSW homelessness in NSW by 2013 Objective H1: To ensure equity, liveability and social people who are inclusion are integrated into plan making and planning A 25% reduction in the number of decision making homeless people sleeping rough in NSW by 2013

A 33% reduction in the number of B. Growing and renewing centres Aboriginal people that are homeless Objective B3 To plan for new centres, and instigate a in NSW by 2013 program for high quality urban renewal in existing centres serviced by public transport H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion Objective H1: To ensure equity, liveability and social inclusion are integrated into plan–making and planning decision making Increase the Increase the proportion of the total H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion number of people community involved in volunteering Objective H2: To ensure appropriate social infrastructure engaged in by 10% by 2016 and services are located near transport, jobs and housing volunteering Increase the Increase the number of visits to State H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion number of people Government parks by 20% by 2016 Objective H2: To ensure appropriate social infrastructure using parks and services are located near transport, jobs and housing Increase the Increase the number of people H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion number of people participating in sporting activities and Objective H2: To ensure appropriate social infrastructure participating in physical activities by 10% by 2016 and services are located near transport, jobs and housing Objective H3: To provide healthy, safe and inclusive places sporting activity based on active transport Increase the Increase visitation and participation A. Strengthening a City of Cities number of people in arts and cultural activity by 10% by Objective A7: To ensure Sydney continues to support major participating 2016 events in iconic locations, and remains competitive In the in the arts and global event and convention market. cultural activity H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion Objective H4 To continue to identify, enliven and protect places of special cultural, social and community value Keeping People Safe Reduced rates of Reduce property crime by 15% by 2016 H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion crime, particularly Objective H1: To ensure equity, liveability and social violent crime Reduce personal crime, particularly inclusion are integrated into plan making and planning violent crime by 10% by 2016 decision–making Objective H3: To provide healthy, safe and inclusive places Reduce alcohol related crime based on active transport Objective H4: To continue to identify, enliven and protect places of special cultural, social and community value

Reduce levels Reduce the proportion of the NSW H. Achieving equity, liveability and social inclusion of antisocial population who perceive problems Objective H1: To ensure equity, liveability and social behaviour with louts, noisy neighbours, public inclusion are integrated into plan making and planning drunkenness, vandalism and hoon decision–making driving Objective H3: To provide healthy, safe and inclusive places based on active transport Objective H4: To continue to identify, enliven and protect places of special cultural, social and community value

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 255 APPENDIX 4 CENTRE TYPES Centres will inevitably grow and change over time, and will actively be encouraged to do so. This table identifies a hierarchy of centres for the Sydney metropolitan Area.

CENTRE TYPES Strategic Global Sydney Global Sydney is divided into two important Centres, Central Sydney and North Sydney. Central Centres Sydney consists of five precincts: Sydney CBD; Pyrmont–Ultimo; Sydney Education & Health; City East; and Redfern–Waterloo. These precincts have distinct roles and identities – as detailed in Strengthening a City of Cities. Global Sydney is the focal point of the Sydney wide public transport system. This system will become increasingly networked, better connecting Global Sydney with the Regional Cities and Major Centres. The governing bodies are the State Government, Council and North Sydney Council. The State Government has an ongoing commitment to the success of Global Sydney as the primary focus for business and linkages to the global economy. Global Sydney Criteria • Global Sydney is the primary focus for national and international business, professional services, specialised health and education precincts, shopping and tourism. It is also a cultural, recreation and entertainment destination of national and international significance. It has iconic public spaces and is a focus for arts and cultural organisations and venues. • Global Sydney has a dominant role in terms of employment, economic and social activity. It has a metropolitan, State, national and international catchment for its activity. It is the global hub of the Australian economy. • Global Sydney has a high concentration of knowledge–based jobs with high skill levels, higher– education requirements, high levels of management responsibility and attractive salaries. • Global Sydney has strong linkages with the international gateways of Sydney Airport and Port Botany. • Global Sydney employs around 400,000 people (2006), and has capacity for more than 50,000 high or medium density homes. • Transport criteria: —Transport catchment: metropolitan, Statewide, national, international. —Focal point and primary destination (for commuters and multiple other trip types) for high volume, high frequency public transport feeders (rail and bus) linked with the entire metropolitan catchment. —Express rail links with Regional Cities and Global Economic Corridor. —Focal point in the motorway network with links to key gateways, Global Economic Corridor and Regional Cities. —Highest standard of freight access as a focal point in the Sydney freight network. • Demonstrated capacity within the commercial core to ensure adequate capacity for the expansion of office and retail space. Demonstrated capacity within mixed use zoning around the commercial core to support core economic functions and provide for higher density residential uses. • Good quality streetscape and a range of activities at street level to service the needs of office workers and visitors, as well as the specialised retail needs of Sydneysiders from across the city. • Walking catchment radius of approximately 2km. Regional Cities The important role of Regional Cities is a core consideration of the Metropolitan Plan in creating a series of connected cities, whereby everyone in the Sydney Metropolitan Area will be within 30 minutes travel by public transport to a Regional City (or Global Sydney) in the long term. Three Regional Cities are identified in the Metropolitan Plan: —Parramatta, Sydney’s second CBD, which serves Western Sydney; —Liverpool, which serves South Western Sydney; and —Penrith, which serves outer Western Sydney and the Blue Mountains. and Newcastle are the Regional Cities for the Illawarra and Lower Hunter regions respectively, and is developing as a Regional City for the Central Coast. The State Government has a strong strategic interest in the success of Regional Cities as key structuring elements for Sydney and as the capitals of their regions.

PAGE 256 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 CENTRE TYPES Regional City Criteria • The centres which constitute Regional Cities contain a full range of business, government, health, retail, cultural, entertainment and recreational activities with good access to parklands. • Their city planning reflects their significance as employment destinations with core commercial areas to support employment growth. • Regional Cities operate as ‘capitals’ of their regions. • Regional Cities have extended development areas beyond their city centres, which provide • employment, services and residential opportunities that create stimulus for future development (such as Westmead in the case of Parramatta, and the Potential Specialised Centre of Penrith Education & Health in the case of Penrith). • Regional Cities are located in large and rapidly growing catchment areas and are not close to each other. • Each Regional City has a suitably sized catchment area to sustain services and employment– generating landuses within that City. • Regional cities typically employ at least 15,000 people, with the potential for growth to 30,000 jobs by 2036. Regional Cities typically have capacity for 35,000–50,000 dwellings. • Regional Cities have a natural setting (such as a river) which provides a critical advantage in enhancing the city’s amenity. • Transport criteria: —Transport catchment: regional. —Focal point for regional public transport services (rail and bus) for commuters and multiple other trip types. —Express rail links with Global Sydney. —Linked with the motorway network to Global Sydney—with links with key gateways, Global Economic Corridor and other Regional Cities. —Focal point of regional arterial road network. —High standard of freight access as a key node in the Sydney freight network. • Demonstrated capacity within the commercial core to ensure adequate capacity for growth and change in office and retail space. Demonstrated capacity within a mixed use zoning around the commercial core to accommodate a range of support services and activities, and residential development. • Walking catchment radius of approximately 2km. Major Centres Major Centres are the main shopping and business centre for their subregions. They also include residential development and other land uses within approximately a 1km radius of the centre. Most Major Centres in Sydney contain large retail centres which from time to time will require upgrading. This cycle of ongoing improvement and growth needs to be understood, and seen as an opportunity to achieve better design outcomes for the retail centre, and for the surrounding area and its streets. The State Government has a strategic interest in the success of Major Centres as key structuring elements for Sydney and as focal points for subregional services. Major Centre Criteria • Major Centres are key structuring elements for growth in subregions. They represent significant employment destinations as well as being active centres with higher density residential development. • Major Centres are the major shopping, business and service centre for the surrounding area, usually with a full scale shopping mall, council offices, taller office and residential buildings, central community facilities, a civic square, cinemas, sporting facilities and significant parklands. • In many cases, Major Centres are the focus for major institutions, principally serving immediate subregional residential populations on the fixed rail network. • Major Centres have a minimum of 8,000 jobs, with the potential for 12,000 jobs by 2036. Major Centres typically have capacity for 9,000 – 28,000 dwellings. Major Centres can be divided into established, planned and potential centres. • Transport criteria: —Transport catchment: subregional. —Linked to the metropolitan rail network directly – or very high volume trunk busways. —Focal point as a destination and origin for subregional public transport services (typically bus). —Focal point of subregional arterial and collector road network. —Freight access links with Sydney freight network. • Major Centres should retain a commercial core in cases where targeted growth for commercial development is at risk of not being accommodated in the centre. Mixed uses should be located around the commercial core, and in some centres this may be a significant proportion of the centre. Residential development in the mixed use area can form an important element in revitalising the centre and provide for more housing choice. • Walking catchment radius of approximately 1km.

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 257 CENTRE TYPES Specialised Centres Specialised Centres are differentiated from other strategic centres in that they perform vital economic and employment roles across the whole metropolitan area. Specialised Centres are critical in sustaining Sydney’s competitiveness, and the State Government has a strategic interest in their success. Specialised Centre criteria • Specialised Centres are areas containing major airports, ports, hospitals, universities, and clusters of research and business activities that perform vital economic and employment roles across the metropolitan area. • Specialised Centres are recognised for the agglomeration economies that they offer as clusters of specialised industry. • The primary significance of Specialised Centres is as employment destinations. • Over time, particular Specialised Centres such as Sydney Olympic Park may assume a greater mix of residential, retail and service uses, and assume the role of a Major Centre. The emergence of these other uses in Specialised Centres needs to be balanced with their employment role. • The way Specialised Centres interact with the rest of the city is complex, and growth and change in and around them must be carefully planned to ensure they continue to serve their primary employment and economic development functions. • Potential Specialised Centres are areas which have the potential to become significant locations for concentrated employment growth. Potential Specialised Centres would need to be located near existing public transport, and/or be supported by public transport improvements. They would complement existing Strategic Centres. • Transport criteria: —Transport catchment: may be irregular and relate to employment specialties of the centre. —Key destination for workforce—access by workforce available by high volume public transport (rail or high volume bus services). —Linked with motorway, arterial roads and relevant freight network to their specialty. • Specialised functions must be protected for the long term, and residential and other non– specialised but competing uses must not override the core activities in these centres. Some however will plan for ancillary uses which are suitable, such as student or staff accommodation near universities and hospitals. • Need high quality public places and parks for workers and nearby residents. • Walking catchment radius of approximately 1km.

PAGE 258 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 CENTRE TYPES Local Centres Town Centres A Town Centre is large group of shops and services, with a mix of uses and good links with the surrounding neighbourhood. It provides the focus for a large residential population.

Town Centre criteria • Comprise more than 50 retail premises and services, generally with supermarkets, sometimes a shopping mall, a variety of specialist shops, restaurants, schools, community facilities such as a local library, and a medical centre. • Tend to be a residential origin location, rather than an employment destination. Contain medium and high density housing, typically containing around 4,500–9,500 dwellings within the walking catchment of the centre. • Are serviced by heavy rail and/or strategic bus and local bus networks, and some have ferry services. • Ideal elements are a town square, a main street, sports facilities and reasonable access to parkland. • Have a walking catchment radius of approximately 800 metres. Stand–alone Shopping Centres The Metropolitan Plan does not provide for the establishment of new stand–alone shopping centres. Existing stand–alone shopping centres are typically internalised, privately owned centres away from other commercial areas, containing many of the attributes of a Town Centre without housing or open space. Through a process of good local planning, existing stand–alone shopping centres may have potential to be converted into more traditional Town Centres over time. Villages A Village is a group of shops and services for daily shopping, with a mix of uses and good links with the surrounding neighbourhood. Village criteria • Comprise retail premises and services for daily shopping, such as supermarkets, butchers, banks, hairdressers, cafes, restaurants, and take away food shops, as well as child care centres, schools and other compatible activities in the immediate vicinity. • Typically contain up to 5,500 dwellings within the walking catchment of the centre and contain medium density housing. • Are serviced by strategic bus and local bus networks as a minimum. • Have a walking catchment radius of approximately 400–600 metres Neighbourhood Centres A Neighbourhood Centre is the smallest recognised centre type in this hierarchy. It is a small group of shops, typically focussed on a bus stop. Neighbourhood Centre criteria • Comprise a few shops and services, such as a corner shop, petrol station/convenience store, café and newsagent. • Typically contain up to 1,000 dwellings within the walking catchment of the centre, including some medium density housing such as townhouses and villas. • May have childcare centres, schools and other compatible activities located close together. • Are serviced by local and/or strategic bus networks. • Have a walking catchment radius of approximately 150–200 metres.

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 259 APPENDIX 5 Future Directions for Strategic Centres

Future Directions and examples Centre Type CENTRE NAME of State Government support Global City SYDNEY CITY Refer to Strengthening the ‘City of Cities’. NORTH SYDNEY Regional Cities PARRAMATTA LIVERPOOL PENRITH Major Centres BANKSTOWN Major Centre serving the South West middle ring • Future Directions: —Provide capacity for office, retail, entertainment, cultural, public administration, services and residential development. —Plan for key development sites and encourage renewal of office buildings. —Improve and manage transport access. • Examples of State Government support —Long–term increase in capacity on Bankstown Rail Line. —Strategic Bus Corridors 12, 23, 25, 28, 33, 34, 35. BLACKTOWN Major Centre serving the North West • Future Directions: —Provide capacity for office, retail, entertainment, cultural, public administration, services and health uses interwoven with higher density residential development to invigorate the centre. —Identify strategic sites to support commercial office development. —Improve linkages between north and south precincts. —Expand learning opportunities in the centre by attracting training organisations, conferences and festivals. —Strengthen links to Western Sydney Employment Hub. —Improve urban design of public domain and open space. —Improve pedestrian access and safety. • Examples of State Government support: —Department of Planning and Blacktown City Council to investigate the centre and environs as a priority area for urban renewal. —Blacktown Hospital: Cardiac Catherisation and Simulation Centre; University of Western Sydney (School of Medicine) Blacktown/Mt Druitt Clinical School. —Western Express rail; duplication of Richmond Rail Line. —Strategic Bus Corridors 1B, 2B, 3 (North–West T–way), 4, 43. —Commuter Car Park Program. BONDI JUNCTION Major Centre serving the East • Future Directions: —Promote as the major retail, office and services centre for the subregion, and retain these uses in a commercial core. —Promote opportunities for new commercial office development. —Provide for high density residential development outside the commercial core. —Increase retail diversity. —Continue to improve the public domain. • Examples of State Government support: —Substantial existing capacity on Eastern Suburbs Rail Line. —Strategic Bus Corridors 18, 29, 30. BROOKVALE– Major Centre serving the North East DEE WHY • Future Directions: —Support concentration of mixed development in Dee Why in accordance with the existing masterplan. —Improve the structure of Brookvale to grow as an integrated retail, office, employment and service centre exploiting major North–South and East– West bus links. —Improve public transport connections. • Examples of State Government support: —Strategic Bus Corridors 15, 16, 17.

PAGE 260 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 Future Directions and examples Centre Type CENTRE NAME of State Government support Major Centres BURWOOD Major Centre serving the Inner West • Future Directions: —Support intensification of mixed use redevelopment. —Provide sufficient capacity for business and employment expansion. —Accommodate a growing residential population. —Manage car parking. • Examples of State Government support: —Western Express rail. —Strategic Bus Corridors 13, 27, 28, 29, 35, 37, 38. —M4 East extension remains a NSW Government priority, and would reduce traffic through Burwood. CAMPBELLTOWN– Major Centre serving the South West MACARTHUR • Future Directions: —Promote intensification of office, retail, entertainment, cultural, public administration and services development in a potential commercial core. —Encourage stronger integration with Campbelltown Hospital, University of Western Sydney Campbelltown campus, and South Western Sydney Institute of TAFE. —Promote residential intensification where it does not preclude employment growth. —Improve connectivity between Macarthur and Queen Street precincts. —Promote higher order retail and service facilities and greater shopping diversity within Queen Street precinct. • Examples of State Government support: —Strategic Bus Corridors 31, 32. —Commuter Car Park Program. —F5 Freeway widening between Liverpool and Campbelltown. CASTLE HILL Major Centre serving the North West • Future Directions: —Reserve land to meet future needs for office buildings, tertiary education, cultural facilities and possibly a council presence within the centre. —Support residential intensification within walking catchment of proposed train station. —Plan for a transport interchange around the proposed train station. —Manage car parking. • Examples of State Government support: —North West Rail Link. —Strategic Bus Corridors 3, 5, 6, 40. —Ring road. CHATSWOOD Major Centre serving the Inner North • Future Directions: —Retain the office–based employment focus in a commercial core. —Promote mixed use and residential intensification outside the commercial core. —Promote benefits of improvements to public transport accessibility and public domain. • Examples of State Government support: —Transport interchange. —Chatswood–Epping–Parramatta Rail Link. —Strategic Bus Corridors 8, 14, 15, 38. HORNSBY Major Centre serving the North • Future Directions: —Provide for increased employment in retail and office uses. —Provide for residential development within walking catchment of the centre. —Investigate opportunities for better pedestrian links between eastern and western sides of the centre. —Revitalise the traditional centre to the west of the station. —Investigate development opportunities to the west of the station. • Examples of State Government support: —Strategic Bus Corridors 5, 7, 8, 41. HURSTVILLE Major Centre serving the South middle ring • Future Directions: —Provide capacity for office, retail, entertainment, cultural, public administration, services and residential development. —Progress new civic precinct being planned by Hurstville Council. —Improve north–south connections across rail line. —Promote benefits of office development in the centre, such as proximity to Sydney Airport. —Improve traffic and parking management. • Examples of State Government support: —Significant capacity on Illawarra Rail Line. —Strategic Bus Corridors 24A, 24B, 25, 26, 27, 30.

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 261 Future Directions and examples Centre Type CENTRE NAME of State Government support Planned KOGARAH Major Centre serving the South middle ring Major Centres • Future Directions: —Maintain and diversify office employment opportunities and intensify mixed uses. —Support and strengthen hospital and banking related industries. —Use St George Hospital as a catalyst for a medical/health precinct. —Protect future opportunities for expansion of commercial, medical and educational uses. • Examples of State Government support: —Strategic Bus Corridors 21, 29. GREEN SQUARE Planned Major Centre serving inner South East • Future Directions: —Continue to plan for a liveable centre with a mix of employment, retail, services and higher density housing supported by good rail access. —Continue to plan for improved pedestrian and cycle access. • Examples of State Government support: —Landcom involvement in site amalgamation and coordinated delivery of infrastructure. —Strategic Bus Corridor 21. ROUSE HILL Planned Major Centre serving the North West Growth Centre and surrounds • Future Directions: —Continue to develop a liveable centre with employment, retail, and services supported by higher density housing within the walking catchment of the centre and future rail station. —Strengthen the cultural role of Rouse Hill House & Farm, and Rouse Hill Regional Park. • Examples of State Government support: —North West Rail Link. —Strategic Bus Corridor 42 (North–West T–way). LEPPINGTON Planned Major Centre serving the South West Growth Centre and surrounds • Future Directions: —Continue to plan for a liveable centre with major employment opportunities, retail and services supported by higher density housing within the walking catchment of the proposed train station. —Ensure commercial uses are supported through planning controls. • Examples of State Government support: —. —Department of Planning leading planning of the centre. Potential FAIRFIELD Potential Major Centre serving the West Major Centres • Future Directions: —Promote office, retail, entertainment, services and mixed use growth opportunities. —Potential increased role for civic uses. • Examples of State Government support: —South West Rail Link. —Strategic Bus Corridor 34. MT DRUITT Potential Major Centre serving the West between Blacktown and Penrith • Future Directions: —Exploit improved rail services to be provided by Western Express rail with opportunities for mixed use development and growth as a services centre for the subregion. —Significant potential for renewal and intensification of private and public housing areas. —Potential to build upon employment opportunities generated by Western Sydney Employment Area, TAFE campus and Mt Druitt Hospital. • Examples of State Government support: —Western Express rail. —Strategic Bus Corridors: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B. PRAIRIEWOOD Potential Major Centre serving the West • Future Directions: —Potential to work with the existing stand alone shopping centre to provide a Major Centre with a broader mix of employment, retail, community, civic, residential and mixed uses. • Examples of State Government support: —Strategic Bus Corridor 11 (Liverpool–Parramatta T–way). SUTHERLAND Potential Major Centre serving the South • Future Directions: —Promote office, retail, entertainment, services and mixed use growth opportunities to invigorate the town centre. —Employment growth has potential to support ANSTO facility at Lucas Heights. —Promote residential development in selected parts of the centre that would not restrict commercial growth. • Examples of State Government support: —Rail: Cronulla Line duplication to provide increased capacity. —Strategic Bus Corridors 22, 23.

PAGE 262 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 Future Directions and examples Centre Type CENTRE NAME of State Government support Specialised MACQUARIE PARK Business park and university within the Global Economic Corridor Centres • Future Directions: —Support high intensity office and education uses within walking distance of rail stations. —Support a vibrant office market by encouraging building forms with a variety of spaces, including small office suites. —Support planned growth of , including commercial uses. ­—Maximise emerging opportunities for employment related to Macquarie University Hospital. —Improve urban design of public domain to support walking and cycling. —Maximise the benefits of improved public transport access and build upon benefits of improved connections to Parramatta and Chatswood. —Address traffic congestion on Ryde Road. • Examples of State Government support: —Chatswood–Epping–Parramatta Rail Link. —North West Rail Link (benefit from increased catchment). —Strategic Bus Corridors 6, 7, 9A, 9B, 14, 36, 39. ST LEONARDS Business centre and hospital within the Global Economic Corridor • Future Directions: —Support high intensity office activity. —Redevelop existing building stocks to provide additional capacity for employment growth. —Continue to support clustering of medical enterprises associated with the Royal North Shore Hospital. —Support emerging technology cluster at Gore Hill Technology Park. • Examples of State Government support: —Royal North Shore Hospital and Community Health Services Redevelopment Project. —Strategic Bus Corridors 6, 9A, 9B, 14. SYDNEY Major events and mixed use Specialised Centre OLYMPIC PARK • Future Directions: —Support intensification of development in accordance with the Masterplan. —Continue to establish a comprehensive network of cycleways and pedestrian paths. —Investigate improved public transport accessibility over the long term. • Examples of State Government support: —Sydney Olympic Park Masterplan 2030. —Western Express rail. RHODES Major retail, health and residential centre • Future Directions: —Support the intensification of commercial and residential activity within the walking catchment of the train station. —Support the clustering of medical enterprises associated with Concord Hospital. —Investigate opportunities for improved ferry access. —Pursue opportunities for pedestrian bridge connecting Rhodes to Wentworth Point. —Examine opportunities to reduce road congestion. • Examples of State Government support: —Strategic Bus Corridor 39. PORT BOTANY International trade gateway & ENVIRONS • Future Directions: —Maintain trade gateway function. —Increase rail freight handling capacity through use of South Sydney Freight Line and Enfield Intermodal Logistics Centre. —Protect and enhance strategic employment lands including at Botany Industrial Area, Mascot and Alexandria. —Reduce impacts of growth on local residential amenity. • Examples of State Government support: —Expansion of Port Botany. —EnfieldI ntermodal Logistics Centre. —Southern Sydney Freight Line. —Strategic Bus Corridors 29, 30. —State significant site listing in SEPP (Major Development) 2005. —Potential improved road link from M5 to Port Botany and Airport. —Airport and Port Access Strategy.

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 263 Future Directions and examples Centre Type CENTRE NAME of State Government support Specialised SYDNEY AIRPORT International aviation gateway & ENVIRONS Centres • Future Directions: (continued) —Maintain international aviation gateway function for freight and passengers. —Work with Federal and local governments to manage the impacts of on– airport non–aviation development proposals. —Manage the impacts of airport freight and passenger growth on transport systems. —Protect and enhance strategic employment lands. —To ensure long–term demand for aviation infrastructure is met, the Federal and NSW State Governments are preparing an Aviation Strategic Plan for the Sydney Region. A joint study has been established to prepare the Plan which will identify options and strategies to meet the aviation capacity needs of the Sydney region. The joint study will also consider land transport infrastructure around Kingsford Smith Airport and the future use of the Commonwealth–owned Badgerys Creek site formerly earmarked for a second Sydney airport. • Examples of State Government support: —Airport and Port Access Strategy. —Strategic Bus Corridors 21, 29. —Potential improved road link from M5 to Airport and Port Botany. RANDWICK Education and health cluster EDUCATION & HEALTH • Future Directions: —Intensify the cluster of education and health enterprises. —Support increased investment in research and medical infrastructure. —Integrate the multi–functional aspects of Randwick Racecourse with the education and health elements of the centre. —Improve walking and cycling access to and within centre. —Identify opportunities for increased housing including student housing and short term housing. —Investigate long–term improvements in public transport capacity in the City–Malabar corridor. • Examples of State Government support: —Strategic Bus Corridors 19, 20, 29, 30. WESTMEAD Health and biotechnology cluster adjacent to Parramatta Regional City • Future Directions: —Intensify the cluster of education and health enterprises. —Investigate opportunities for creating a more vibrant town centre precinct with active street frontages linking the hospital to the station. • Examples of State Government support: —Westmead Hospital Redevelopment Stage 2. —Western Express rail; Chatswood–Epping–Parramatta Rail Link. —Strategic Bus Corridor 42 (North–West T–way). BANKSTOWN Growing general aviation centre AIRPORT– MILPERRA • Future Directions: —Increase employment intensity by providing aviation and other specialised business clusters in the airport land and Milperra industrial lands. —Improve links to Bankstown. —Raise the profile of the centre. • Examples of State Government support: —Strategic Bus Corridor 33. NORWEST Business park serving the North West • Future Directions: —Support intensification of office uses generally, and especially within the walking catchment of the proposed train station. —Improve walking and cycling connections to surrounding area. • Examples of State Government support: —North West Rail Link. —Strategic Bus Corridor 42 (North–West T–Way).

PAGE 264 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 Future Directions and examples Centre Type CENTRE NAME of State Government support Potential PENRITH Potential Specialised Centre linking Nepean Hospital, University of Western Specialised EDUCATION & Sydney and Western Sydney Institute of TAFE Centres HEALTH • Future Directions: —Promote clustering of health and education enterprises, and better linkages between the hospital, university and TAFE. —Improve connections between Penrith centre – and the hospital, university and TAFE. • Examples of State Government support: —Government Taskforce with the Penrith Business Alliance to develop a strategic vision. —Western Express rail. —Nepean Hospital Redevelopment Stage 3. —Strategic Bus Corridor 2A. —Proposed interchange improvements to Kingswood Station. FRENCHS FOREST Potential Specialised Centre combining large employment area with potential hospital and health related uses • Future Directions: —Focus concentration of office–based employment. —Support medical enterprise clustering in the potential hospital precinct. —Investigate potential for associated retail and residential uses subject to detailed strategic planning and urban design investigations. —Investigate public transport improvements, including bus priority improvements on Warringah Road. —Investigate improvements to key road intersections. • Examples of State Government support: —Potential location for new Northern Beaches hospital. —Strategic Bus Corridors 15, 17.

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 265 APPENDIX 6 Natural Resource Management State Targets against Metropolitan Plan Objectives

Metropolitan Plan Objective Targets for Natural Resource Management Improve health of waterways, By 2015 there is: coasts and estuaries • an improvement in the condition of riverine ecosystems • an improvement in the ability of groundwater systems to support Source: NSW State Plan groundwater–dependent ecosystems and designated beneficial uses • no decline in the condition of marine waters and ecosystems • an improvement in the condition of important wetlands, and the extent of those wetlands is maintained • an improvement in the condition of estuaries and coastal lake ecosystems Achieve a sustainable • Increase annual water recycling from 15 billion litres in 2005 to 70 use of water billion litres by 2015 • Save 145 billion litres of water per year by 2015, representing almost a Sources: Corporation, Hunter Water, Department of Environment, Climate Change and 25% reduction from Water, Sydney Catchment Authority Sydney’s projected water demand in that year • Meet reliability performance standards for water continuity and quality • Reliability Performance standards for water continuity and quality Protect Sydney’s unique By 2015 there is: diversity of plant and animals • an increase in native vegetation extent and an improvement in native vegetation condition Source: NSW State Plan • an increase in the number of sustainable populations of a range of native fauna species • an increase in the recovery of threatened species, populations and ecological communities • a reduction in the impact of invasive species Improve Sydney’s air quality Meet national air quality goals (as specified in the National Environment Protection Measure for Ambient Air Quality) Air Quality Source: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water Minimise household exposure Meet criteria identified in: to unacceptable noise levels • State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007 • Development near Rail Corridors and Busy Roads—Interim Guideline Source: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water and NSW Department of (DoP, 2008) Planning • NSW Industrial Noise Policy (EPA, 2000) • Interim Construction Noise Guideline (DECC, 2009) • Interim Guideline for Assessment of Noise from Rail Infrastructure Projects (DECC, 2007) (currently under review) • Assessing Vibration—a Technical Guide (DEC, 2006) • Environmental Criteria for Road Traffic Noise (EPA, 1999) (currently under review) Minimise and recycle waste Meet the 2014 NSW waste recycling targets (as specified in the NSW Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy) NSW Waste Source: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy measures Maintain Soil Condition By 2015 there is: • an improvement in soil condition Source: NSW State Plan • an increase in the area of land that is managed within its capability Reduce Sydney’s Emissions • Achieve a 60 per cent cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 in line with Federal Government targets Source: NSW State Plan • Achieve 20 per cent renewable energy consumption by 2020 in light of the Federal Government’s expanded Renewable Energy Target.

PAGE 266 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 APPENDIX 7 REFERENCES

Australia, Canberra, accessed 18 October 2010, A. Strengthening . Renewing Centres Albanese, A 2008, ‘New agenda for prosperity Marchetti, C 1994, ‘Anthropological invariants in Centre for International Economics 2010, The benefits conference: our infrastructure catch–up,’ in New travel behavior,’ Technological Forecasting and Social and costs of alternative growth paths for Sydney: Agenda for Prosperity Conference: Our Infrastructure Change, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 75–88. economic, social and environmental impacts, Centre for Catch–up, Melbourne, 28 March 2008, Melbourne International Economics, Canberra. Institute/The Australian, Melbourne. Mercer n.d., Mercer 2010 Quality of Living survey highlights—Global, accessed 2 November 2010, Department of Infrastructure and Planning 2010, Allen, P 2010, ‘Big Rethink on Infrastructure Needed,’ . Transit Oriented Development Guide, Department of Public Administration Today, no. 23, July–Sept, Infrastructure and Planning, Brisbane, accessed 18 pp. 4–5. Mori Memorial Foundation 2009, Global Power City October 2010, . Anholt, S n.d., The Anholt–GfK Roper City Brands Memorial Foundation, Tokyo, Japan, accessed 13 Index, accessed 2 November 2010, . index.aspx>. Department of Planning 2005, City of Cities: A Plan for Mrdak, M 2010, ‘The Infrastructure Challenge,’ Public Sydney’s Future, NSW Government, Sydney. Committee for Sydney 2009, Global Sydney: Administration Today, no. 23, July–Sept, pp. 6–11. Challenges and Opportunities for a Competitive Global Department of Planning 2009, Draft Centres Policy, City, prepared by SGS Economics and Planning, Joint Ministerial Taskforce on Department of Planning, Sydney, accessed 12 October October 2009. Tourism, Planning and Investment 2010, Tourism 2010, . Department of Premier & Cabinet 2009, Integrated NSW, Sydney, accessed 2 November 2010, . Department of Planning, Sydney, accessed 18 October tionid=1&mi=6&ml=9&AreaIndex=IntPlanRept>. 2010, . again,’ The Economist, 11 February, accessed 4 November 2010, . Seeking Authenticity, Escaping into Fantasy, or Metropolitan Development Program–Residential Experiencing Reality,’ Choice, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. Forecasts 2008/09–2017/18, Department of Planning, Foreign Policy, A.T. Kearney & Chicago Council 927–937. Sydney. on Global Affairs 2010, ‘The Global Cities Index 2010,’ accessed 2 November 2010, . Research Bulletin, no. 353. Transport: The right place for business and services— planning policy, Department of Urban Affairs and GfK Custom Research North America 2009, Paris Tops PriceWaterhouseCoopers 2010a, Cities of Opportunity: Planning, Sydney, accessed 27 October 2010, . Brands Index, accessed 2 November 2010, . opportunity/assets/pwc–citiesofopportunity–2009. Plan: Connecting the City of Cities, NSW Government, pdf>. accessed 18 October 2010, . Network PriceWaterhouseCoopers 2010b, Sydney Australia’s Global City, Sydney Business Chamber, Sydney, NSW Government 2010b, NSW Government Response Globalization and World Cities Research Network accessed 2 November 2010, . WESTERNSYD_response_10.pdf>. inventory–world–cities–rankings–2008–a.html>. Property Council of Australia 2005, Securing the NSW Government 2010c, NSW State Plan, Globalization and World Cities Research Network Commercial Future of the Sydney CBD, A submission Department of Premier and Cabinet, Sydney, accessed 2010b, Welcome to GaWC—the leading academic to the City of Sydney Council and Central Sydney 15 August 2010, . thinktank on cities in globalization, accessed 2 Planning Committee, accessed 2 November 2010, November 2010, . . 18 October 2010, . nsw.gov.au/aboutnsw/default.htm>. Swan, W 2008, Nation Building and the Future Economy: Address to the Infrastructure Association Ruming, K, Randolph, B, Pinnegar, S & Judd, B 2007, Industry & Investment NSW 2010, Sydney and of Queensland Lunch: No.034, accessed 18 ‘Delivering sustainable renewal in Australia’s middle New South Wales: Fast Facts March 2010, NSW October 2010, . 2007, University of South Australia, , pp. Infrastructure Australia 2006, A Report to the 693–704, accessed 18 October 2010, . Australia, Canberra, accessed 18 October 2010, . 2010, . Infrastructure Australia 2009, National Infrastructure Priorities: Infrastructure for an economically, socially, UNWTO—see United Nations World Tourism and environmentally sustainable future, Infrastructure Organisation Australia, Canberra, accessed 18 October 2010, . World Tourism Organization, accessed 4 November 2010, . Infrastructure Australia 2010, Getting the fundamentals right for Australia’s infrastructure Xinhua News Agency 2010, ‘China unveils Shanghai– priorities: An Infrastructure Australia report to the Hangzhou high–speed railway; eyes network Council of Australian Governments, Infrastructure extension,’

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 267 Real Estate Institute of NSW 2010, NSW faces Economics, Canberra, accessed 14 October 2010, C. Transport for a accommodation crisis for frontline workers if rental . 2010, . Sydney’s Future, NSW Government, Sydney. December 2009, Treasury, Canberra. Shorten, B (Parliamentary Secretary for Disabilities Department of Planning 2007, Employment Infrastructure Australia. 2010, State of Australian and Children’s Services) 2010, Promoting livable Lands for Sydney Action Plan, NSW Government, Cities 2010, Major Cities Unit, Canberra. housing design in Australia, 13 July 2010, media accessed 5 October 2010, . Data Centre, Sydney. shorten_m_housingstandards_13july2010.aspx>. Department of Planning 2009, Draft Centres Policy, D. Housing Sydney’s Tanton, R, Nepal, B & Harding, A 2008, Wherever I lay NSW Government, Sydney, accessed 12 October my debt, that’s my home: Trends in housing affordability 2010, . NATSEM Income and Wealth Report Issue 19 March Australian Bureau of Statistics 1961, Census of the 2008, NATSEM University of Canberra, Canberra. Department of Premier and Cabinet 2008, Towards Commonwealth of Australia, 1961, Australian Bureau 2030: planning for our changing population, of Statistics, Canberra. Wulff, M, Dharmalingam, A, Reynolds, M & Yates, Department of Premier and Cabinet, Sydney. J 2009, Australia’s private rental market: changes Australian Bureau of Statistics 2004, Disability, Ageing (2001–2006) in the supply of, and demand for low rent Global and World Cities Project 2008, The World and Carers: Summary of Findings, Australia, 2003, Cat. dwellings, AHURI, Melbourne. according to GaWC, accessed 1 October 2010, . accessed 27 October 2010, . Industry & Investment NSW 2010, NSW Business E. Growing Sector Growth Plan, NSW Innovation Council, Sydney, Australian Bureau of Statistics 2006a, Census Sydney’s Economy accessed 12 October 2010, . Australian Bureau of Statistics 2006b, Population Council, accessed 12 October 2010, . NSW Department of Education and Training & Department of Planning 2008a, New South Wales Australian Bureau of Statistics 2006, Census of NSW Office for Science and Medical Research 2010, Household and Dwelling Projections, 2006–2036: 2008 population and housing, Australian Bureau of NSW Tertiary Education Plan, Sydney, accessed 12 Release, Department of Planning, Sydney. Statistics, Canberra. October 2010, . State and Regional Population Projections, 2006–2036: MapStats: Sydney (Statistical Subdivision), ABS, 2008 Release, Department of Planning, Sydney. Canberra, accessed 12 October 2010, . Report July 2010, Department of Planning 2010a, MDP 2008/09 Report: Metropolitan Development Program– Residential Australian Bureau of Statistics 2010, Measures of Sydney Airport Corporation Limited 2009, Forecasts 2008/09–2017/18, Department of Planning, Australia’s Progress, 2010, Cat.no. 1370.0, Australian Sydney Airport Master Plan 2009, Sydney Airport Sydney. Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, accessed 29 September Corporation Limited, Sydney, accessed 12 October 2010, . Master–Plan.html>. Statistical Local Area Population Projections, 2006–2036, Department of Planning, Sydney. Bureau of Transport Statistics 2008a, 2006 TDC Transport and Regional Services 2007, Estimating JTW Summary Tables by Local Government Area urban traffic and congestion cost trends for Australian Department of Premier and Cabinet 2008, Towards (GMA) Destination, Transport Data Centre, accessed cities, Working Paper 71, Bureau of Transport 2030: planning for our changing population, 13 October 2010, http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/ and Regional Economics, Canberra, accessed 5 Department of Premier and Cabinet, Sydney. sites/default/file/tdc/documents/06JTW–Summary– October 2010, . Holloway, D & Bunker, R, 2006, Planning, Housing and Energy Use: A Review, Practice Reviews, Urban Policy Bureau of Transport Statistics 2008b, 2006 TDC JTW Urban Research Centre—University of Western and Research Vol 24, No. 1, March 2006, City Futures Summary Tables by Local Government Area (GMA) Sydney, 2008. North West and West Central: Sydney Research Centre, Faculty of the Built Environment, Origin, Transport Data Centre, accessed 13 October Employment Strategies, prepared for the Western University of NSW, Sydney. 2010, http://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/ Region Organisation of Councils and Projects file/tdc/documents/06JTW–Summary–Tables– Partners, access 1 November 2010 http://www.uws. Landcom 2009, Housing Diversity Guide, Landcom, Origin–LGA.xls edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/57617/Western_ Parramatta, accessed 29 October 2010, . Bureau of Transport Statistics 2010, S2010/2: Employment Forecast Summary—Base Year 2006 NSW Health & Department of Planning 2008, Forecast to 2036, Transport Data Centre, accessed Avoiding heavy traffic impacts on new residential 12 October 2010, . Embodied Energy of Residential Areas in the Urban BIS Shrapnel 2009, Sydney’s Suburban Centres and Environment, A thesis submitted to The University Office Parks Update 2009–2019, BIS Shrapnel, Sydney. of Adelaide in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Architecture, City of London 2010, Global Financial Centres Landcape Architecture and Urban Design, October Index, accessed 12 October 2010, . Ownership, Report no.28, Productivity Commission, Melbourne. Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government 2010, Statistical REINSW—see Real Estate Institute of NSW Report:Aviation: International Airline Activity 2009, Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional

PAGE 268 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 Cope, M, Lee, S, Physick, B, Abbs, D, Nguyen, K & gov.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=yHOCF– F. Balancing Land Uses McGregor, J 2008, A Methodology for Determining the baJXs%3d&tabid=394&language=en–AU>. on the Fringe Impact of Climate Change on Ozone Levels in an Urban Area: final report, Dept. of the Environment and Water Department of Planning 2010c, Discussion Paper on Centre for International Economics 2010, The benefits Resources, Canberra, A.C.T. Planning for Renewable Energy Generation—Solar and costs of alternative growth paths for Sydney: Energy. Consultation Draft April 2010, Department of economic, social and environmental impacts, Report for Council of Australian Governments 2007, National Planning, Sydney, accessed 14 October 2010, . Department of Planning 2010, MDP 2008/09 Report: 3 February 2010, . Guidelines: Adapting to Sea Level Rise, Department Sydney. of Planning, Sydney, accessed 22 July 2010, . accessed 20 October 2010 Assessment, Growth Centres, accessed 14 October Department of Environment and Conservation 2010, . Pollution in the Greater Sydney Metropolitan Region, G. Tackling Climate Department of Environment and Conservation NSW, Hawkesbury Nepean Catchment Management Change and Protecting Sydney. Authority n.d., Hawkesbury Nepean Catchment Action Sydney’s Natural Plan 2007–2016, Hawkesbury Nepean Catchment Department of Environment, Climate Change and Management Authority, accessed 16 August 2010, Environment Water 2007, NSW Waste Avoidance and Resource . Recovery Strategy 2007, Department of Environment, Arup 2010a, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Snapshot. Climate Change and Water NSW, Sydney, accessed 14 Khalaj, B, Lloyd, G, Sheppeard, V & Dear, K 2010, 2036 Metropolitan Plan Review, Report for NSW October 2010, . New South Wales, Australia: a case–only analysis,’ Arup 2010b, World Leading Practice in Emissions International Archives of Occupational and Department of Environment, Climate Change Environmental Health, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 833–42. Reduction—Spatial Policy, Report for NSW and Water 2009a, Action for Air, Department of Department of Planning, Sydney. Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, London Energy Partnership 2008, Low Carbon Zones Australian Bureau of Statistics 2010, Measures of Sydney, accessed 10 September 2010, . Forum. Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, accessed 29 September Department of Environment, Climate Change McKibbin, W & Pearce, D 2009, ‘Climate change 2010, . the Environment Report 2009, Department of accessed 3 March 2010, . Ecosystem Processes and People in the Sydney Region, Department of Environment, Climate Change and NERA Economic Consulting 2010 Cost Benefit Final Report to the New South Wales Department of Water 2009c, NSW Sea Level Rise Policy Statement, Analysis and Economic Evaluation of BASIX Environment and Climate Change: Climate Change Department of Environment, Climate Change and unpublished document. Impacts and Adaptation Research Project 050831, Water NSW, Sydney. New South Wales Department of Environment and NSW Government 2010, NSW State Plan, Department Climate Change. Department of Environment, Climate Change and of Premier and Cabinet, Sydney, accessed 15 August Water 2010, NSW Climate Impact Profile: the impacts 2010, . Bureau of Meteorology & CSIRO 2010, State of the of climate change on the biophysical environment Climate, Bureau of Meteorology, Canberra, accessed of New South Wales, Department of Environment, NSW Office of Water 2010,2010 Metropolitan Water 29 September 2010, . Environment, Climate Change and Water, Sydney. Department of Environment, Climate Change and Centre for International Economics 2010, The benefits Water 201b, Waste avoidance and resource recovery Roads and Traffic Authority, NSW 2008, Traffic and costs of alternative growth paths for Sydney: progress report 2010, unpublished. volume maps for clause 102 of the Infrastructure SEPP, economic, social and environmental impacts, Report for Traffic volume maps for Infrastructure SEPP. NSW Department of Planning, Sydney. Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water & Department of Primary Industries Stern, N 2007, Executive summary (full), Stern Review Chertow, M n.d., People/Marian Chertow, accessed 8 2008, Paper: A New Biodiversity Strategy for NSW, final report, accessed 29 September 2010, . Water NSW, Sydney, accessed 20 September 2010, hm–treasury.gov.uk/stern_review_report.htm>. Chertow, M, Ashton, W & Kuppalli, R n.d., The . Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Industrial Symbiosis Research Symposium at Yale: Authority 2009, Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Advancing the Study of Industry and Environment, Yale Department of Planning 2008, Development Action Plan, Sydney Metropolitan Catchment F&ES Publication Series: Report No.3, New Haven, Near Rail Corridors and Busy Roads—Interim Authority, Parramatta, accessed 18 October 2010, Connecticut. Guideline, Department of Planning, Sydney, . and taxonomy,’ Annual review of energy and the nsw.gov.au/planningsystem/pdf/guide_infra_ devtrailroadcorridors_interim.pdf>. environment, vol. 25, pp. 313–37. Woodruff, R, Hales, S, Butler, C & McMichael, A 2005, Climate Change Health Impacts in Australia: ClimateWorks Australia 2010a, Low Carbon Growth Department of Planning 2010a, Blacktown City Council Growth Centre Precincts Development Control Effects of Dramatic CO 2 Emission Reductions, Report Plan for Australia, ClimateWorks Australia, Clayton, for Australian Conservation Foundation and the VIC. Plan 2010, Department of Planning, Sydney, accessed 9 October 2010, . 2010, . ClimateWorks Australia, Clayton, VIC. Department of Planning 2010b, Discussion Paper on Planning for Renewable Energy Generation – Small Wind Turbines. Consultation Draft April 2010, Department of Planning, Sydney, accessed 14 October 2010,

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 269 McKenzie, S 2004, Social Sustainability: Towards H. Achieving Equity, Some Definitions, Working Paper Series No.27, Hawke I. Delivering Liveability and Social Research Institute, Magill, SA, accessed 17 August the Strategy 2010, . Banks, G 2009, ‘Back to the Future: Restoring Australian Bureau of Statistics 2008a, National Health Australia’s Productivity Growth,’ in The Road to Survey: Summary of Results; State Tables, 2007–2008 Moore, T 2006, Early childhood and long term Recovery, Melbourne Institute/The Australian (Reissue), Cat. no. 4362, Australian Bureau of development: the Importance of the early years, Economic and Social Outlook Conference, Melbourne, Statistics, Canberra. Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth, accessed 18 October 2010, . Indexes for Areas (SEIFA 2006), Cat.no. 2033.0.55.001, Early_Childhood_and_long_term_development_The_ Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. Importance_of_the_Early_Years_2006.pdf>. Business Council of Australia 2009, Groundwork for Growth: Building the Infrastructure that Australia Bartolomei, L, Corkery, L, Judd, B & Thompson, S National People with Disabilities and Carer Council Needs, Business Council of Australia, Melbourne, 2003, A Bountiful Harvest: Community Gardens and 2009, Shut Out: The Experience of People with accessed 18 October 2010, . Government—Department of Housing; University of for Department of Families, Housing, Community New South Wales. Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA), Council of Australian Governments 2007, ‘Attachment accessed 13 August 2010, . Canberra, accessed 3 February 2010, . boilerhouse/docs/establishing%20standards%20 2009, Built 4 kids : a good practice guide to creating web.pdf>. child–friendly built environments, NSW Commission Infrastructure Australia 2009, Better Infrastructure for Children and Young People, Surry Hills, NSW, Decision Making Guidelines, Australian Government, Centre for Epidemiology and Research 2009, 2009 accessed 7 October 2010, . infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/files/IA_Reform_ Wales Population Health Survey, NSW Health, Sydney. Investment_Framework_Guidance_7Oct.pdf>. NSW Police 2010, Safer By Design, NSW Police Dodson, J & Sipe, N 2005, Oil Vulnerability in the Force, accessed 7 October 2010, . Economy, OECD Territorial Reviews, Organisation for October 2010, . & Giles–Corti, B 2010, ‘Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and Dodson, J & Sipe, N 2008, Unsettling Suburbia: The proximity of neighborhood open spaces,’ American New Landscape of Oil and Mortgage Vulnerability Journal of Public Health, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 1752–1757. in Australian Cities, Research Paper 17, Griffith University Urban Research Program, Brisbane, Sugiyama, T, Leslie, E, Giles–Corti, B & Owen, N accessed 5 October 2010, . coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships?,’ Journal of Epidemiology and Gebel, K, King, L, Bauman, A, Vita, P, Rigby, A & Capon, Community Health, vol. 62, no. 5, p. e9. A 2005, Creating healthy environments: A review of links between the physical environment, physical Thompson, S, Corkery, L & Judd, B 2007, The activity and obesity, NSW Health Department and Role of Community Gardens in Sustaining Healthy NSW Centre for Overweight and Obesity, Sydney, Communities, accessed 13 August 2010, . healthy_environments.pdf>. Vinson, T 2007, Dropping off the Edge: the distribution Harris, E 2008, ‘Urban Planning for Community of disadvantage in Australia, Jesuit Social Services / Gardens: What has been done overseas, and what can Catholic Services Australia, Richmond, Vic. we do in South Australia?,’ Honours thesis submitted as part of a Bachelor in Urban and Regional Planning Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils School of Natural and Built Environments thesis, & Gethin, A 2007, Urban University of South Australia, Adelaide. Development Health Impact Assessment: Final Report, Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils Howard, A 2006, What constitutes child friendly Ltd (WSROC), Sydney. communities and how are they built?, Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth, West Perth, WSROC—see Western Sydney Regional Organisation WA, accessed 5 October 2010, . Jacobs, J 1961, The death and life of great American cities, Random House, [New York]. Khalidi, NA 2009, Aboriginal population projections, New South Wales, 2006 to 2021, NSW Department of Aboriginal Affairs, accessed 2 December, 2010, . Lette, J & Wiggins, D 2010, Development & Active Living: Designing projects for active living: a development assessment resource and navigational tool, Premier’s Council for Active Living NSW, Sydney.

PAGE 270 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 APPENDIX 8 GLOSSARY

BUS PRIORITY CLIMATE CHANGE FUTURE URBAN AREAS HIGH DENSITY HOUSING GLOSSARY Bus priority includes both ADAPTATION Future urban areas are areas More than 60 net dwellings OF TERMS electronic priority and Adaptation involves which have been planned by per hectare. physical infrastructure minimising the harmful the State Government for the measures to give buses impacts of climate change. fringe expansion the city and HIGH RISE HOUSING priority over other vehicles. It is a process by which which include the Growth Six storeys or more. Includes ACCESSIBILITY Electronic technology strategies to moderate, cope Centres, greenfield release flats, shop top housing and Refers to the extent to includes bus–activated with, and take advantage areas and future employment large mixed use developments which people have access traffic signals and bus lane of the consequences of lands. such as offices and shops with to employment, goods and enforcement cameras. climate events are enhanced, housing above. services, either through Physical infrastructure developed and implemented. GLOBAL CITY proximity or transport links includes bus only lanes and Since different places will A global city (also known as a HOUSEHOLD to places. queue–jumps at traffic lights. experience different climate world city or world–class city) One or more persons that change impacts, adaptation is a city which has a direct usually reside in the same ACTIVE TRANSPORT BUSY ROADS and tangible impact on global private dwelling. Walking, cycling and the measures need to be carefully One of the following: targeted to local conditions affairs through socioeconomic, use of other mainly human Roads specified in Clause cultural, and/or political HOUSING powered transport including and considered (but not AFFORDABILITY 102 of the Infrastructure necessarily implemented) means. wheelchairs, scooters and SEPP: a freeway, tollway or a Housing affordability is the power–assisted pedal cycles. as early as possible in the affordability of housing in transitway or any other road planning process. GLOBAL ECONOMIC with an average annual traffic CORRIDOR general. This includes the ADAPTABLE HOUSING The part of eastern Sydney cost of construction and the Housing that has been (AADT) volume of more than CLIMATE CHANGE 40,000 vehicles (based on the MITIGATION stretching from Sydney supply of serviced new release designed and built so that Airport and Port Botany land as well as escalating land it can be easily modified traffic volume data provided Climate change mitigation on the website of the RTA). involves action that aims through Sydney City and and house values. This affects to become accessible for North Sydney to Macquarie a broader cross–section of a person with a physical to reduce greenhouse gas Any other road—with an emissions today in order to Park which provides Sydney’s, society. disability or progressive average annual daily traffic NSW’s and Australia’s most physical incapacity. Adaptable limit further climate change in HOUSING STRESS (AADT) volume of more than the future. valuable links with the world housing can accommodate 20,000 vehicles (based on the economy. Housing stress is defined as the changing needs of people traffic volume data published DWELLING TARGET households in the lower 40 per over their life and allow people on the website of the RTA). Permanent private dwellings GREENFIELD cent of income distribution to remain in their home for not including commercial, RELEASE AREA paying more than 30 per cent longer as they age. Any other road—with a high assisted, group or temporary New metropolitan fringe areas of their income on mortgage level of truck movements or housing (housing with shared released by State Government repayments or rent. AFFORDABLE HOUSING bus traffic. facilities or short term) for future housing and A term for housing for very formally adopted onto the HOUSING TARGETS low income households, CENTRAL COAST ECOLOGICAL Metropolitan Development Housing targets were low income households or The local government areas of FOOTPRINT Program. calculated after considering moderate income households. Gosford and Wyong which are The measure of the impact household and dwelling This covers households earning subject to a separate Regional of direct and indirect GREENHOUSE GASES projections, demographic up to 120% of the median Strategy. consumption of resources Greenhouse gases trap the and economic trends, land income for the area where they and production of wastes. It sun’s warmth, and maintain the capacity, infrastructure and live and the household pays CENTRE converts this consumption Earth’s surface temperature at feasibility. A key guiding factor more than 30% of that gross A place where varying into a single index of the land a level necessary to support life. for distributing new housing income in rent. concentrations and area that would be needed Human actions are increasing targets is the subregional combinations of retail, to sustain a population the concentrations of these jobs–to–population ratio. AMENITY commercial, civic, cultural and indefinitely. gases that trap more heat This broadly indicates a city’s The enjoyment of the residential uses are focused and change the climate. This efficiency in terms of work environment, whether public around transport facilities. EMPLOYMENT LANDS is the enhanced greenhouse travel distances and local or private lands, by individuals Employment lands include the effect. employment opportunities. or the community. It includes CITY OF CITIES traditional industrial areas for Using this ratio to guide land the enjoyment of privacy, The ‘City of Cities’ concept manufacturing, warehousing, GREENSPACE use ensures integration with sunlight, views, quiet, access describes a compact and construction and repairs; The area of urban land transport and links decisions to local facilities and similar multi–centred city structure, business and technology devoted to parks, reserves, about housing to the NSW freedom from nuisance. where people and businesses parks for higher–order trails, gardens, recreation and State Plan’s ‘more jobs closer do not need to travel long jobs; and areas containing a other open spaces, including to home’ aim. BUILT ENVIRONMENT distances to access work, nature strips along transport The urban environment mix of activities associated services, markets and with transforming, storing, corridors. consisting of buildings, regional facilities. This in infrastructure, roads, maintaining and repairing turn promotes productivity materials and goods. GROWTH CENTRES fixtures, parks, and all other and reduces car use, energy The North West and South West improvements that form the use and emissions, while EXISTING AREAS/ Growth Centres are areas on the physical character of a city. supporting a more active EXISTING URBAN AREA fringe of Western Sydney that lifestyle. Land zoned for an urban have been designated for new BUSINESS PARK communities of up to 160,000 A large distinct employment purpose excluding all Greenfield release areas homes in the next 25 to 30 space independent of a mixed years. These new communities use centre, which is generally and future employment lands. have been designed so that master planned or under a infrastructure is developed as single management regime. the communities are populated.

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 271 INCLUSIONARY ZONING OPEN SPACE S117 DIRECTIONS STRATEGIC BUS SYDNEY STATISTICAL The incorporation of Areas that are set aside Section 117 of the CORRIDORS DIVISION (SSD) provisions within a planning within the city boundaries Environmental Planning and Strategic bus corridors are The Sydney Statistical instrument requiring the for recreational uses with Assessment Act (NSW) gives designed to connect major Division, as defined by inclusion of certain uses or unrestricted public access, the Minister for Planning centres across Sydney, linking the Australian Bureau of facilities as a mandatory such as parks, playing fields, the authority to incorporate to important transport, health Statistics, is made up of requirement for development landscape buffers and specific directions into Local and educational facilities and 43 local government areas approval. Can be used to community paths, but does Environment Plans. other community facilities, that constitute the greater require that a development not include National Parks or and integrating with local bus Sydney metropolitan area. include a component of nature reserves. SECTION 94 services. They will provide This extends to and includes affordable housing or a (OR S94) a network of fast, frequent, the Shires of Sutherland and monetary contribution ORBITAL MOTORWAY Section 94 of the direct and convenient bus Wollondilly in the south, the towards the provision of such NETWORK Environmental Planning services. Cities of Blue Mountains and housing. Sydney’s circumferential and Assessment Act (NSW) Hawkesbury in the west and network of linked tolled and provides that, if the consent STRATEGIC CENTRES the Central Coast LGAs of INFILL DEVELOPMENT untolled freeways made up of authority is satisfied that if These are centres of a larger Gosford and Wyong in the New development that occurs the Sydney Harbour Tunnel, a development is likely to scale, and are considered north. within established urban areas Eastern Distributor, M5, increase the demand for public crucial to the economic, where the site or area is either Westlink M7, M2, Lane Cove amenities or public services social and environmental TRANSPORT NODES vacant, or has previously Tunnel and the Warringah in the area, the authority may functioning of the entire city Transport Nodes are the been used for another Freeway. require the applicant to make and the State. They consist of 800 m walkable catchment urban purpose. The scale of a financial payment and/or Global Sydney, Regional Cities, from a train station and a development can range from OUT–OF–CENTRE dedicate land free of cost as Major Centres and Specialised 400 m catchment from a bus the creation of one additional HOUSING DEVELOPMENT a condition of approving the Centres. node or light rail station. residential lot to a major Housing that is situated development mixed–use redevelopment. away from centres which SUBREGIONAL UNIVERSAL DESIGN have transport, shops and SOCIAL CAPITAL STRATEGIES Universally designed homes JOBS:POPULATION entertainment within a Social capital is the social The metropolitan area is are those which meet the RATIO walkable distance. bonds and connections too large and complex to changing needs of occupants The jobs–to–population ratio in communities, based on resolve all the planning across their lifetimes, as they This defined as the proportion POPULATION networks of mutual support, aims and directions down age or acquire a disability. of an economy’s working– PROJECTIONS reciprocity, and trust, which to a detailed local level Universally designed homes age population that is Population projections are facilitate cooperation within through one Metropolitan give people with disability employed. As an indicator, the not predictions or forecasts, or among groups. Plan. Subregional planning greater independence and jobs:population ratio provides but are simply illustrations is an intermediate step to choice about where they live. information on the ability of of the growth and change in SOCIAL ECONOMIC translating the Metropolitan an economy to create jobs. A population that would occur INDEX FOR AREAS Plan to a local level, and URBAN CONSOLIDATION high overall ratio is typically if certain assumptions about (SEIFA) recognises that some The process of increasing considered ‘good’. future levels of fertility, Australian Bureau of issues extend beyond local dwelling densities within mortality, internal migration Statistics Social Economic government boundaries established areas over LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL and overseas migration were Index for Areas compares and require a ‘subregional’ and above what is already PLAN (LEP) to prevail over the projection advantage and disadvantage approach. there through infill or The principal legal document period. based on attributes such redevelopment of existing for controlling development as income, educational SUBREGIONS buildings. at the council level. The PRECINCT PLAN attainment, unemployment, Sydney City, East, South, zoning provisions establish A plan, to be outlined in jobs in relatively unskilled Inner West, Inner North, URBAN DESIGN permissibility of uses and the Growth Centres State occupations and variables that North, North East, West Urban Design is the practice of standards regulate the extent Environmental Planning reflect disadvantage. Central, North West, South shaping the physical features of development. They are Policy, which will replaced West and South. of settlements to create places prepared by councils and the existing LEP and will be SOCIAL HOUSING for people and to make high– approved by the Minister prepared without needing Social housing provides SUSTAINABILITY quality connections between (after public exhibition). to revisit issues—such secure, affordable housing for Meeting the needs of places and buildings for the as threatened species or people with a housing need on the present without safe movement of people. LOW INCOME heritage—already designated low incomes. Social housing compromising the ability of HOUSEHOLDS in the Growth Centres encompasses properties future generations to meet URBAN FOOTPRINT Households receiving between Structure Plan. owned or managed by Housing their own needs. The urban footprint refers 50% and 80% of the gross NSW, community housing to the combined extent median income. PUBLIC DOMAIN providers and the Aboriginal SYDNEY of the existing urban area The public domain is the Housing Office. METROPOLITAN AREA and endorsed future urban LOCAL CENTRES spaces between buildings The 41 local government areas. Future urban areas are These are centres of a where people can walk, sit, STANDARD areas of Ashfield, Auburn, those identified by the NSW smaller scale. They consist of read a newspaper, or interact INSTRUMENT LEP Bankstown, Baulkham Government for the city’s Town Centres, Villages and with other members of their In 2006, the NSW Hills, Blacktown, Blue expansion. They include the Neighbourhood Centres. community. The public Government gazetted a Mountains, Botany, Burwood, North West and South West domain includes all spaces standard instrument for Canada Bay, Camden, Growth Centres, greenfield LOW DENSITY HOUSING accessible to and used by the preparing new LEPs, also Campbelltown, Canterbury, release areas and future Less than 25 net dwellings public, including external and known as the LEP template. Fairfield, Hawkesbury, employment lands. per hectare. This includes internal public space. It may Local plans across NSW will Holroyd, Hornsby, Hunters the number of dwellings only include spaces such as public now use the same planning Hill, Hurstville, Kogarah, URBAN RENEWAL within land zoned for housing, squares, the space between language, making it easier for Ku–ring–gai, Lane Cove, The revitalisation of and not including land for buildings, streets, parks and communities to understand Leichhardt, Liverpool, Manly, established urban areas to open spaces, roads etc. transport interchanges. The what is proposed for their Marrickville, Mosman, provide for a greater range of public domain serves a range local area. Councils are able North Sydney, Parramatta, housing, employment, services MEDIUM DENSITY of purposes and human to include localised planning Penrith, Pittwater, Randwick, and social activities. HOUSING activities. objectives and provisions Rockdale, Ryde, Strathfield, 25 to 60 net dwellings per specific to their area, as well as Sutherland, Sydney, WATER SENSITIVE hectare. RENEWAL determine zoning, additional Warringah, Waverley, URBAN DESIGN (WSUD) Refer Urban Renewal land uses, heritage items, and Willoughby, Wollondilly and WSUD refers to the design MODE principles that aim to reduce The type of vehicle or method development standards such Woollahra. RENEWABLE ENERGY as height and minimum lot the impact of interactions used for a trip, e.g. train, bus, Renewable energy comes from SYDNEY REGION between the urban built form walk. sizes. Refer Local Environment sources such as the sun, wind, Plan (LEP). Is the Sydney Statistical (including urban landscapes) wave, hydro, geothermal and and the urban water cycle as MODERATE INCOME Division as defined by the organic matter. Generating STATE ENVIRONMENTAL Australian Bureau of Statistics defined by the three urban HOUSEHOLDS energy from these sources water streams of potable Households receiving between PLANNING POLICY (ABS) which includes Gosford produces minimal overall (SEPP) and Wyong. water, wastewater and 80% and 120% of the gross greenhouse gas emissions and stormwater. median income. State Environmental Planning reduces other impacts on the Policies deal with issues environment. significant to the state and WESTERN SYDNEY NET DWELLINGS Fourteen local government PER HECTARE people of NSW. They are made RESIDENTIAL DENSITY by the Minister for Planning areas that includes Auburn, Number of dwellings within Net dwellings per hectare Bankstown, Baulkham Hills, land zoned for housing less and may be exhibited in draft form for public comment Blacktown, Blue Mountains, areas provided for open space, Camden, Campbelltown, roads, etc. before being gazetted as a legal document. Fairfield, Hawkesbury, NEW RELEASE Holroyd, Liverpool, GREENFIELD AREAS Parramatta, Penrith and Refer to greenfield release area Wollondilly.

PAGE 272 | Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 LANDCOM PLANNING GLOSSARY OF GLOSSARY A State Owned Corporation REFORM FUND ACRONYMS OF OTHER and a development arm The aim of the Planning of the NSW Government. Reform Fund is to support CBD PROJECTS AND Today Landcom is a leading initiatives to streamline the Central Business District—an INITIATIVES masterplanner, facilitator planning process, making it area of intense concentration and developer of sustainable more strategic, efficient and of commercial, retail, services The Metropolitan Plan communities in NSW. transparent while enhancing and leisure activities is integrated with many Landcom creates resident, community involvement. The Government strategies and commercial and industrial Planning Reform Fund helps COAG initiatives. communities on both vacant fund the reforms and can Council of Australian land and established sites. assist councils in particular by Governments ACTION FOR AIR supporting the delivery of new Action for Air is the NSW METRIX local plans and key strategic DCP Government’s 25–year air Is an internet based planning projects. Development Control Plan quality management plan subregional planning tool. is a detailed guideline that for the Greater Metropolitan METRIX is being used in the PRECINCXTM illustrates the controls that Region covering Sydney, subregional planning process PRECINXTM is a mathematical apply to a particular type of the Lower Hunter and the by State agencies and local planning and design tool to development or in a particular Illawarra. government. Through this evaluate the sustainability area. A DCP refines or tool, the NSW Government of a neighbourhood or large supplements an LEP or State BASIX and local government share a urban development project. Policies and is made according The Building and common set of information, It can be used to assess key to the Environmental Planning Sustainability Index, is a which provides a basis to aspects of a project’s social, and Assessment Act 1979. NSW Government initiative discuss the distribution of economic and environmental that ensures new homes are growth among centres and to performance. PRECINXTM is EPBC Act designed and built to use less assess local housing needs. designed to assist land The Environment Protection potable water and produce developers, urban planners Biodiversity and Conservation fewer greenhouse METROPOLITAN and regulatory authorities Act 1999 gives the Federal gas emissions. DEVELOPMENT make decisions about new Government an approval PROGRAM (MDP) urban development. role for certain kinds of CENTRE FOR The MDP is the NSW development which are AFFORDABLE HOUSING Government’s key program SHARING SYDNEY considered to be of national The Centre works with federal, for managing land supply state and local government, HARBOUR ACCESS environmental importance. and assisting infrastructure PROGRAM (SSHAP) It outlines objectives for non–profit organisations, and coordination. Land supply A grants funding program protecting matters of national private companies to generate refers to the dwelling potential which improves public environmental significance. creative responses to declining from greenfield release areas access to and enhance the housing affordability. This and existing urban areas. recreational enjoyment of LEP includes direct funding for (MDP 2008–09 Report) Sydney Harbour and its Local Environmental Plan not for profit registered The MDP replaced the former tributaries. community housing providers Urban Development Report LGA and developers such as the (UDP) and Metropolitan SYDNEY METROPOLITAN Local Government Area National Rental Affordability Urban Development Program DEVELOPMENT administered by a local Scheme and working with (MUDP) in 2001. (MDP AUTHORITY (SMDA) council under the Local private developers to develop 2008–09 Report glossary) The Sydney Metropolitan Government Act 1993 and affordable housing strategies Development Authority will other legislation. via planning agreements. METROPOLITAN work across government, The Centre also works with GREENSPACE with councils and the private NRM Housing NSW and local PROGRAM sector, to achieve high quality Natural Resource Management and state governments to Allocates grants to councils urban renewal in the Sydney identify opportunities to in the Sydney Region to assist Region. The Authority will PCAL deliver affordable housing, for local government to plan and define and recommend areas Premier’s Council on Active example through the Housing Living. improve regionally significant that will benefit from urban Affordability Fund. open space. renewal. Where appropriate, RWA it will act as a development CENTRES DESIGN METROPOLITAN proponent on State–owned Redfern–Waterloo Authority GUIDELINES established in 2005 and is WATER PLAN land to expedite development A resource for planners, The NSW Government’s and provide local economic responsible for revitalising the architects, urban designers, area through urban renewal. Metropolitan Water Plan benefits. property owners and outlines the mix of measures community illustrating that ensure Sydney, the STATE INFRASTRUCTURE SEIFA clear directions on how to Australian Bureau of Statistics Illawarra and the Blue STRATEGY improve the design quality, Mountains (greater Sydney) The State Infrastructure Social Economic Index for amenity and vitality of urban Areas have enough water now and Strategy is a rolling 10–year centres and providing design for the future. plan for infrastructure SEPP principles and examples projects to support service State Environmental Planning of how to accommodate NATION BUILDING delivery. First published in Policies deal with issues additional growth within ECONOMIC 2006, it is updated every two significant to the state and centres, while respecting local STIMULUS PLAN years. The Strategy maps people of NSW. They are made character. This $42 billion Australian infrastructure projects by by the Minister for Planning government package was six broad regions—Sydney, COMMUNITY HOUSING introduced in February Central Coast, Hunter, North and may be exhibited in draft PROVIDERS (CHPs) form for public comment 2009 to fund the delivery Coast, Illawarra—South East CHPs are not–for–profit of infrastructure projects and Inland NSW. before being gazetted as a legal organisations with a charter to document. including social housing. The manage housing for low–to– Plan provided $1.7 billion to TOTAL ASSET WHO moderate income and special deliver around 6,300 social MANAGEMENT World Health Organisation needs households. housing homes in NSW by Total Asset Management is June 2012. the strategic management of HOUSING physical assets to best support AFFORDABILITY FUND NSW BIKE PLAN the delivery of agency services. This fund focuses on proposals NSW BikePlan details a 10– that improve the supply of new year plan for funding bicycle housing and make housing infrastructure across NSW. more affordable for home buyers entering the market. NSW STATE PLAN Under round two of the fund, The 2010 NSW State Plan— the Federal Government Investing in a better future is targeted projects that were the NSW Government’s plan transit oriented or which to achieve promised results reduced the concentrations over the medium to long term of disadvantage on public across seven broad areas of housing estates through activity: better transport and infrastructure and other liveable cities, supporting reform initiatives. business and jobs, clever State, healthy communities, green State, stronger communities and keeping people safe.

Metropolitan Plan for Sydney 2036 | PAGE 273 CREDITS DESIGN & ART DIRECTION

Anagram Studio Simeon King, Christie Hunt, Hannah Young, Henry King and Kate Johnson.

Typeset in Gotham and Chronicle designed by Hoefler & Frere–Jones.

PHOTOGRAPHY

Thematic photography: Louise Hawson www.52suburbs.com

Aerial photography: Karl Schwerdtfeger, Craig Allchin and Simeon King