DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigation Report Investigation into the cumulative impacts of Seniors Housing in the rural areas of The Hills and Hornsby local government areas 1 November 2019 Contents Glossary of terms ........................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Purpose of the Investigation .............................................................................................. 9 1.2 Project area .................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Project governance ......................................................................................................... 13 1.3.1 Project control group terms of reference .................................................................. 13 1.4 Project approach ............................................................................................................. 13 2 About the Seniors Housing SEPP .......................................................................................... 15 2.1 Key provisions in the Seniors Housing SEPP ................................................................. 15 3 Context .................................................................................................................................. 19 3.1 Social and demographic context ..................................................................................... 19 3.1.1 Overview of Hornsby LGA ....................................................................................... 20 3.1.2 Overview of The Hills LGA ....................................................................................... 23 3.1.3 Demographic trends in Hornsby and The Hills LGAs – key findings ......................... 26 3.2 Economic context ........................................................................................................... 27 3.3 Environmental context .................................................................................................... 29 3.4 Infrastructure context ...................................................................................................... 32 4 Analysis of seniors housing development activity and trends ................................................. 34 4.1 Development activity ....................................................................................................... 34 4.1.1 State-wide trends in SCC applications ..................................................................... 34 4.1.2 Overview of seniors housing in The Hills and Hornsby LGAs ................................... 34 4.1.3 Key development activity findings ............................................................................ 37 4.1.4 Development characteristics .................................................................................... 38 4.2 Key issues for SCC and DA assessment ........................................................................ 38 4.3 Market trends .................................................................................................................. 40 4.4 Demographic analysis ..................................................................................................... 43 5 Stakeholder insights ............................................................................................................... 45 5.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................... 45 5.2 Stakeholder comments ................................................................................................... 46 5.2.1 Feedback from government agencies and service providers ................................... 46 5.2.2 Feedback from developers ...................................................................................... 48 5.2.3 Feedback from peak industry bodies ....................................................................... 49 5.2.4 Key findings ............................................................................................................. 50 6 Investigation findings ............................................................................................................. 51 6.1 Impact on rural values and local character ...................................................................... 51 6.1.1 Rural character impacts ........................................................................................... 51 6.2 Economic impacts ........................................................................................................... 56 6.3 Social impacts................................................................................................................. 57 6.4 Environmental impacts .................................................................................................... 58 6.5 Infrastructure provision ................................................................................................... 59 6.6 Alignment with strategic planning .................................................................................... 62 6.7 Implications ..................................................................................................................... 64 6.7.1 Implications for the broader Metropolitan Rural Area ............................................... 66 7 Next steps .............................................................................................................................. 67 7.1 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 67 7.2 Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 68 7.3 Project Control Group deliberations ................................................................................ 70 Appendix 1: Background to Seniors Housing SEPP ...................................................................... 72 Appendix 2: Strategic planning context ......................................................................................... 77 Appendix 3: Local planning controls .............................................................................................. 80 Appendix 4: Development activity ................................................................................................. 82 Appendix 5: Development characteristics ..................................................................................... 89 Appendix 6: SEPP Seniors Housing Market Report: Hornsby and The Hills LGAs ........................ 91 Page iii Glossary of terms Term Definition DA Development application DPIE NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment FSR Floor space ratio GSC Greater Sydney Commission GSRP Greater Sydney Region Plan ILU Independent living unit LEP Local environmental plan LGA Local Government Area LSPS Local strategic planning statement MRA Metropolitan Rural Area (as defined in the Greater Sydney Region Plan) NSLHD North Sydney Local Health District PCG Project Control Group chaired by the North District Commissioner and comprising representatives from Hornsby Shire Council, The Hills Shire Council, the Department and the GSC. Project area The rural areas of Hornsby and The Hills RACF Residential aged care facility Reporting period The period from October 2007, when the SCC process was first introduced, to May 2019, which was the focus of analysis for this investigation RMS Roads and Maritime Services SCC Site compatibility certificate Seniors housing Residential accommodation that is, or is intended to be, used permanently for seniors or people, as defined in the Seniors Housing SEPP Seniors Housing SEPP State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 WSLHD Western Sydney Local Health District Page iv Executive Summary This report has been prepared by the Greater Sydney Commission (GSC) for submission to the Secretary of the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE). It documents the findings of an investigation into the planning challenges for seniors housing in parts of the metropolitan rural areas of Greater Sydney. Specifically, the investigation focuses on the cumulative impacts on infrastructure and character in the experience in the rural areas of The Hills and Hornsby LGAs (the project area). The investigation included an analysis across social, economic and environmental issues in consultation with a range of stakeholders which underpins the recommendations of options for further consideration by the Secretary. One of the most long-standing housing policies administered by DPIE is State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 (‘the Seniors Housing SEPP’) which aims to increase the supply and diversity of housing to meet the needs of seniors or people with a disability. As well as allowing seniors housing or housing for people with a disability in a wide range of zones throughout the urban area, the Seniors Housing SEPP enables seniors housing to be developed on rural land adjoining urban land, subject to the issue of a Site Compatibility
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Sydney Submission on the CFFR Affordable Housing Working
    City of Sydney Town Hall House City of Sydney submission 456 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 on the CFFR Affordable Housing Working Group Issues Paper March 2016 Contents Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Context: housing affordability pressures in inner Sydney ...................................................2 The City’s response to the Issues Paper ............................................................................4 Broad-based discussion questions ..................................................................................4 Model 1: Housing loan/bond aggregators .......................................................................6 Model 2: Housing trusts ...................................................................................................7 Model 3: Housing cooperatives .......................................................................................8 Model 4: Impact investing models including social impact bonds ...................................9 Other financial models to consider ................................................................................10 1 / City of Sydney response to the Affordable Housing Working Group Issues Paper Introduction The City of Sydney (the City) welcomes the initiative by the Council on Federal Financial Relations Affordable Housing Working Group (‘the Working Group’) to examine financing and structural reform models that have potential to enable increased
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric to Reality: Devolving Decision-Making to Aboriginal Communities RESEARCH & EVALUATION
    Rhetoric to reality: Devolving decision-making to Aboriginal communities RESEARCH & EVALUATION Published by: NSW Aboriginal Affairs, Department of Education, 35 Bridge Street SYDNEY NSW 2001 Tel: 1800 019 998 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aboriginalaffairs.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978-0-9585971-6-6 Copyright June 2017 Suggested citation: Andrew, L., Cipants, J., Heriot, S., Monument, P., ARTIST RECOGNITION (COVER) Pollard, G., and Stibbard, P. (2017). Rhetoric to Kim Healey is a descendant of the Bundjalung and Reality: Devolving decision-making to Aboriginal Gumbaynggirr nations, and also a descendant of the communities. Sydney: NSW Aboriginal Affairs, Djunbun (Platypus) Clan, original custodians of the Department of Education. Washpool at Lionsville in Northern NSW. She currently lives within Country in South Grafton NSW, creating and Acknowledgements telling her stories along the mighty Clarence River. Kim This report was prepared by students as part strives to capture Country and utilise her voice through of the Work Based Project in partial fulfilment of her work, to interpret the world around her. the Executive Master of Public Administration This work captures Kim Healey’s connection to Country. degree at the Australia and New Zealand School It speaks of the Bundjalung and Gumbaynggirr nations of Government (ANZSOG). NSW Aboriginal which were created by the Yuladarah, the creator of Affairs contributed in-kind support for the study. rivers, boundaries and tribal land. This is the Clarence ANZSOG permission to publish is gratefully River boundary with Susan Island in the middle of these acknowledged. two tribes which is a birthing place. Using a sgraffito technique, scribing in the sandy medium is a mapping The report was made possible with the system of Country.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Housing More Affordable
    MAKING HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE Housing Affordability Task Force Urban Development Institute of Australia NSW At the beginning of 2017, the Urban Development Institute of Australia NSW (UDIA NSW) established a Housing Affordability Task Force to deliver an action plan aimed at addressing the housing affordability crisis in NSW. UDIA NSW would like to thank the task force members for their input into the action plan. UDIA NSW Housing Affordability Task Force Members Mike Scott (Chair), The Treadstone Company Arthur Ilias, Lendlease / UDIA NSW President Nicole Woodrow, Task Force Program Manager Stephen Abolakian, Hyecorp Toby Adams, Charter Keck Cramer Gerry Beasley, Walker Corporation Michael Corcoran, UDIA National President Rod Fehring, Frasers Property Australia Andrea Galloway, Evolve Housing Ian Harrison, St George Bank Shane Geha, EG Property Peter Howman, Development Services Advisory Toby Long, Mirvac Jennifer Macquarie, The Housing Trust Richard Rhydderch, Stockland Dominic Sullivan, Payce Nick Tobin, Aqualand Sara Watts, City West Housing Officers Steve Mann, UDIA CEO Justin Drew, UDIA NSW GM Policy and Corporate Affairs MAKING HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE 1 CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 2 Purpose 3 The Problem – Aligning Supply and Demand 3.1 Housing Supply Drivers 3.2 Housing Demand 3.3 Identification of the Problem – Housing Supply and Affordability Reform 4 The Solution – Fix the Housing Supply Chain 4.1 Co-ordination of Housing Supply and Supporting Infrastructure 4.2 Diversity 4.3 Productivity and Efficiency 4.3.1 Uncertain Timeframes
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Environmental Factors Woolloomooloo Wastewater
    Review of Environmental Factors Woolloomooloo Wastewater Stormwater Separation Project March 2016f © Sydney Water Corporation (2016). Commercial in Confidence. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced without the express permission of Sydney Water. File Reference: T:\ENGSERV\ESECPD\EES Planning\2002XXXX_Hot spots 3\20029431 Woolloomooloo sewer separation\REF Publication number: SWS232 03/16 Table of Contents Declaration and sign off Executive summary ........................................................................................................... i 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Woolloomooloo Wastewater Stormwater Separation .............................................. 2 1.3 Related stormwater projects ...................................................................................... 4 1.4 Scope of this REF ........................................................................................................ 4 2. Stakeholder and community consultation .......................................................... 5 2.1 Consultation objectives .............................................................................................. 5 2.2 Social analysis ............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Consultation
    [Show full text]
  • Social Housing: E-Brief
    July 2011 e-brief 8/2011 Social housing by Louise O'Flynn 1. Introduction housing management. 85% of these were public housing, 11% were The phrase social housing is often community housing, 3% were used interchangeably with terms such Aboriginal Housing Office dwellings, as 'affordable', 'public' or 'low cost' and 1% was crisis accommodation.4 In housing.1 Social housing is one 2010, there were over 83,000 people mechanism adopted by Local, State on the social housing waiting list in and Commonwealth Governments to NSW.5 address the housing affordability problem in NSW. This e-brief outlines the history of the NSW social housing system and looks Since its introduction in the early at the current situation for the three 1900s, the focus of social housing has social housing subsectors. It also shifted from "supplying affordable considers government social housing properties for rental or home purchase initiatives, briefly outlines the NSW to low and middle income working social housing regulatory framework families, towards providing and highlights several stakeholder accommodation on a priority needs perspectives on the system. basis to households with special needs or in challenging circumstances".2 2. History of the NSW social Today, households in social housing housing system generally have very low incomes; receive a government pension as their The provision of social housing in main source of income; are mostly NSW has changed considerably over single persons; and are older than the its life.6 It has transitioned from population in general.3 housing for low income working families in the early 1900s to a social The current NSW social housing housing system that involves all levels system encompasses: of government, the not-for-profit sector and other organisations, with the aim Public housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan
    OUR GREATER SYDNEY 2056 A metropolis of three cities – connecting people DRAFT Greater Sydney Region Plan October 2017 How to be involved The draftGreater Sydney Region Plan sets out a vision, Before making a submission, please read the Privacy objectives, strategies and actions for a metropolis of three Statement at www.greater.sydney/privacy. If you provide cities across Greater Sydney. It is on formal public exhibition a submission in relation to this document using any of the until 15 December 2017. above addresses, you will be taken to have accepted the Privacy Statement. You can read the entire draft Plan atwww.greater.sydney Please note that all submissions and comments will be You can make a submission: treated as public and will be published in a variety of by visiting www.greater.sydney/submissions mediums. If you would like to make a submission without by emailing [email protected] it being made public or if you have any questions about the application of the Commission’s privacy policy, please by post to: contact the Commission directly on 1800 617 681 or Greater Sydney Commission [email protected] Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan PO BOX 257 Parramatta NSW 2124 Greater Sydney Commission | Draft Greater Sydney Region Plan 2017 3 A metropolis of three cities will transform land use and transport patterns and boost Greater Sydney’s liveability, productivity and sustainability by spreading the benefits of growth to all its residents. Chief Commissioner Lucy Hughes Turnbull AO I am delighted to present the Greater take the pressure off housing affordability Sydney Commission’s first draft regional and maintain and enhance our plan to the people of Greater Sydney and natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 October 2014 Ms Leilani Farha UN Special Rapporteur on Adequate
    Incorporating Domestic Violence Legal Service Indigenous Women’s Legal Program 31 October 2014 Ms Leilani Farha UN Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Special Procedures Branch Palais Wilson, Room 3-077 CH – 1211, Geneva 10 Switzerland By email: [email protected] Dear Ms Farha, Report on the responsibilities of governments at sub-national level in the implementation of the right to adequate housing 1. Women’s Legal Services New South Wales (WLS NSW) thanks the UN Special Rapporteur on adequate housing for the opportunity to comment on the responsibilities of governments at sub-national level in the implementation of the right to adequate housing. 2. WLS NSW is a community legal centre that aims to achieve access to justice and a just legal system for women in New South Wales, Australia. We seek to promote women’s human rights, redress inequalities experienced by women and to foster legal and social change through strategic legal services, community development, community legal education and law and policy reform work. We prioritise women who are disadvantaged by their cultural, social and economic circumstances. We provide specialist legal services relating to domestic and family violence, sexual assault, family law, discrimination, victims compensation, care and protection, human rights and access to justice. 3. We are deeply concerned that inadequate housing options and the lack of any enforceable right to adequate housing on the national and sub-national levels in Australia means that women who experience domestic and/or family violence are exposed to unacceptable risks to their safety and in some circumstances unable to escape the violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Call to Arms Over Outsourcing Operations Falling Into the Hands Morony Correctional Centre Will of the Private Sector
    Public Service Association of NSW Post Office approved PP 255003/01563 ISSN 1030–0740 Red TapeJanuary–April 2016 www.psa.asn.au PSA confronts private jail plans The State Government’s obsession with privatisation continues, this time with plans to 'market test' the operations of NSW prisons. However, the PSA’s Steve on performance targets for the state’s inmate population passes MacMahon is not convinced. first time” and “an independent 12,000. “We have been trying to work consultant has been engaged to Interview on the ABC, Minister with the Baird Government in analyse public prison operations Elliot described NSW prisons as “a fixing the overcrowding crisis in in NSW and compare them to the growth industry”. our jails, but this is purely about private sector as well as public As the Government ponders more selling off public assets to get prisons in Queensland”. privatised options, a report from their hands on more money.” However, the benchmarking the University of Sydney has found privatised prisons “will not lead to In a recent performance audit, process will not apply to the John increased public accountability”. Corrective Services NSW Morony prison, which is going was urged to “complete its straight to ‘market testing’. “There are many instances of benchmarking exercise on public private prison failure,” reads The correctional centre performance”. The Government’s moves, teamed Costs of Commissioning by Associate with a boost in bed numbers in The report found that “individual Professor Jane Andrew, Dr Max Berrima and Cessnock, come at Baker and Dr Philip Roberts. public correctional centre a time when prison numbers are performance could not be “Recent examples include the determined as correctional skyrocketing.
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor Estates
    Corridor Estates In the 1970s, the Commission also developed a number of smaller estates along the Liverpool – Campbelltown corridor at suburbs including Macquarie Fields, Airds, Minto and Claymore. The development of these so called ‘corridor estates’ coincided with a general move away from developing the large-scale, low density estates that typified the 1950s and 60s; focus was placed instead on the development of medium density suburbs utilising the townhouses typology first used at Mount Druitt. Figure 97 – Proposals for the Macquarie Fields ‘corridor estate’, dated 1970-71 Source: The Housing Commission of New South Wales Annual Report, 1970-71, p. 24. These estates, the first being Macquarie Fields, were characterised by a smaller overall area of development, a high percentage of townhouses, and the use of the ‘Radburn’ style layout. During this time, townhouses in the ‘Radburn’ layout were also incorporated into some of the older neighbourhood estates, including Windale. URBIS SSP_WATERLOOMETROQUARTER_HERITAGEIMPACTSTATEMENT_FINAL APPENDICES (UPDATED) Micro-Estates The 1980s saw further evolution of the ‘public housing estate’ as conceived and developed from the 1940s onwards, with the Commission deciding in 1975, for the first time, to redevelop parts of its own housing stock. The principal example of this was the introduction of a micro-estate in to the established public housing at Villawood/East Fairfield; a number of earlier fibro cottages were demolished to make way for a ‘micro-estate’ planned in the ‘Radburn’ style. The cottages set on a conventional street grid were replaced with townhouses and maisonettes that faced away from the streets, had common driveways, and small private streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland /Prospect DDS 4 AGEING, DISABILITY and HOME
    METROPOLITAN CONSTITUENCY DELEGATES AGEING, DISABILITY AND HOME CARE – Cumberland /Prospect DDS 4 AGEING, DISABILITY AND HOME CARE – Hornsby-Ryde DDS 2 AGEING, DISABILITY AND HOME CARE – Inner West DDS 2 AGEING, DISABILITY AND HOME CARE – Manly-St. Leonards DDS 1 AGEING, DISABILITY AND HOME CARE – Nepean DDS 2 AGEING, DISABILITY AND HOME CARE – South East/St. George DDS 1 AGEING, DISABILITY AND HOME CARE – South Western DDS 1 (AGEING, DISABILITY AND HOME CARE - Department of (AGEING, DISABILITY AND HOME CARE – South Eastern DDS (HOME CARE SERVICE NSW – Metropolitan 2 AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 1 AUDIT OFFICE OF NSW, THE - *See Combined Met. East (AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY (MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY 1 BOARD OF STUDIES, TEACHING & EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS NSW - *See Combined Met. East BOTANIC GARDENS & DOMAIN TRUST, THE ROYAL – Metropolitan 1 (COMBINED – METROPOLITAN EAST* (ART GALLERY OF NSW (AUDIT OFFICE OF NSW (BOARD OF STUDIES,TEACHING & EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS NSW (COMMUNITY RELATIONS COMMISSION (INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NSW – Head Office (LIQUOR, GAMING & RACING, NSW OFFICE OF (LOCAL GOVERNMENT, OFFICE OF (OMBUDSMAN NSW (PARK TRUSTS – Metropolitan (incl Centennial Park/West. Syd/Parra) (SPORT & RECREATION TARONGA CONSERVATION SOCIETY AUSTRALIA (TRADE & INVESTMENT, REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES (TRANSGRID – Metropolitan (WOMEN NSW 14 (COMBINED –METROPOLITAN WEST* (ARTS NSW – Metropolitan General (INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF NSW – Metropolitan General 5 COMMUNITY SERVICES – Cumberland /Prospect 4 COMMUNITY SERVICES – Nepean
    [Show full text]
  • IT COULD BE YOU: Female, Single, Older and Homeless
    domestic violence do job loss job loss job female, single, older and homeless homeIt could ownership be you: ho poverty poverty po- gender inequity gen living alone living alo crisis crisis crisis crisi renting renting rentin addiction addiction a divorce divorce divor medicalLudo McFerran medical med no income no income . IT COULD BE YOU: female, single, older and homeless. > 1 ISBN: 978-0-9751994-5-9 ©August 2010 This study and report was a collaborative project of Homelessness NSW, the Older Women’s Network NSW and the St Vincent de Paul Society, with support provided by the Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse. Researched and authored by Ludo McFerran with assistance from Sonia Laverty. The project was funded by the Office for Women’s Policy, Department of Premier and Cabinet, NSW Government and the St Vincent de Paul Society (NSW). The author wishes to thank Sonia Laverty and Sue Cripps for their support and friendship through this project. Other important contributors have been Trish O’Donohue, Trish Bramble and Bobbie Townsend, and many thanks to the support team in the Older Women’s Network NSW, including Matina Mottee, Jane Mears, Joy Ross and Penne Mattes. We all want to thank the women who were interviewed for this report. We hope that their lives continue to improve and that their stories contribute to better policy and housing supply to prevent homelessness for older women in the future. Sue Cripps CEO Homelessness NSW 99 Forbes Street Woolloomooloo NSW 2011 | PO Box 768 Strawberry Hills NSW 2012 (02) 9331 2004 | 0417 112 311 [email protected] | www.homelessnessnsw.org.au Older Women’s’ Network NSW Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019-2020
    Annual Report 2019/20 Greater Sydney Commission Annual Report 2019/20 November 2020 © Crown Copyright 2020 NSW Government ISBN 978-0-6489844-1-2 Acknowledgement of Country The Greater Sydney Commission acknowledges the traditional owners of the lands in the Greater Sydney Metropolitan Area and the living culture of the traditional custodians of these lands. We recognise traditional owners have occupied and cared for this Country over countless generations and celebrate their continuing contribution to the life of Greater Sydney. Disclaimer While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of NSW, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance or upon the whole or any part of this document. Copyright notice In keeping with the NSW Government’s commitment to encourage the availability of information, you are welcome to reproduce the material that appears in Greater Sydney Commission – Annual Report 2019/20 for personal, in-house or non-commercial use without formal permission or charge. All other rights reserved. If you wish to reproduce, alter, store or transmit material appearing in this Greater Sydney Commission – Annual Report 2019/20 for any other purpose, request for formal permission should be directed to the details below. Email: [email protected] Address: Level 5, 10 Valentine Ave, Parramatta NSW 2150 Tel: (02) 8289 6200 or 1800 617 681 Business hours: 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday 3 Letter to the Premier The Hon.
    [Show full text]