DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Environmental Factors Woolloomooloo Wastewater

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Environmental Factors Woolloomooloo Wastewater Review of Environmental Factors Woolloomooloo Wastewater Stormwater Separation Project March 2016f © Sydney Water Corporation (2016). Commercial in Confidence. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced without the express permission of Sydney Water. File Reference: T:\ENGSERV\ESECPD\EES Planning\2002XXXX_Hot spots 3\20029431 Woolloomooloo sewer separation\REF Publication number: SWS232 03/16 Table of Contents Declaration and sign off Executive summary ........................................................................................................... i 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Woolloomooloo Wastewater Stormwater Separation .............................................. 2 1.3 Related stormwater projects ...................................................................................... 4 1.4 Scope of this REF ........................................................................................................ 4 2. Stakeholder and community consultation .......................................................... 5 2.1 Consultation objectives .............................................................................................. 5 2.2 Social analysis ............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Consultation during the REF ...................................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Key government stakeholder feedback ....................................................................................... 8 2.3.2 Key community stakeholder feedback ......................................................................................... 9 2.4 Summary of matters identified ................................................................................. 10 2.5 Consultation on REF ................................................................................................. 11 2.6 Further consultation .................................................................................................. 11 2.7 ISEPP Consultation ................................................................................................... 12 3. Legislation and planning context ...................................................................... 14 3.1 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 .............................................. 14 3.2 State and Regional Environmental Planning Policies ........................................... 14 3.2.1 State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007 ....................................................... 14 3.2.2 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005 .............................. 15 3.3 Sydney Local Environment Plan 2012 ..................................................................... 15 3.4 Other NSW legislation ............................................................................................... 15 3.5 Commonwealth legislation ....................................................................................... 18 4. Alternatives and justification for the project .................................................... 19 4.1 Objectives .................................................................................................................. 19 4.2 Project need ............................................................................................................... 19 4.3 Consideration of alternatives ................................................................................... 19 4.4 Consideration of principles of Ecologically Sustainable Development ............... 22 5. Project Description ............................................................................................. 23 5.1 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................... 23 5.1.1 Stream Street ............................................................................................................................. 24 5.1.2 Brougham Lane ......................................................................................................................... 29 5.1.3 Darlinghurst Road ...................................................................................................................... 31 5.1.4 Forbes Street ............................................................................................................................. 33 5.1.5 Riley Street ................................................................................................................................ 35 5.1.6 Womerah Avenue ...................................................................................................................... 39 5.2 Pre-construction ........................................................................................................ 41 5.3 Construction Activities ............................................................................................. 41 5.4 Working hours ........................................................................................................... 44 5.5 Commissioning .......................................................................................................... 45 5.6 Operation .................................................................................................................... 45 5.7 Changes to the Scope of Work ................................................................................ 45 6. Site Specific Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Measures .............. 46 6.1 Stream Street ............................................................................................................. 46 6.1.1 Topography, geology and soils .................................................................................................. 46 6.1.2 Water and drainage ................................................................................................................... 47 6.1.3 Flora and Fauna ......................................................................................................................... 49 6.1.4 Air quality ................................................................................................................................... 50 6.1.5 Noise and vibration .................................................................................................................... 50 6.1.6 Non-Aboriginal heritage ............................................................................................................. 53 6.1.7 Aboriginal heritage ..................................................................................................................... 56 6.1.8 Traffic and access ...................................................................................................................... 57 6.1.9 Waste ......................................................................................................................................... 59 6.1.10 Social and visual ........................................................................................................................ 59 6.2 Brougham Lane ......................................................................................................... 61 6.2.1 Topography, geology and soils .................................................................................................. 61 6.2.2 Water and drainage ................................................................................................................... 61 6.2.3 Flora and Fauna ......................................................................................................................... 62 6.2.4 Air quality ................................................................................................................................... 62 6.2.5 Noise and vibration .................................................................................................................... 63 6.2.6 Non-Aboriginal heritage ............................................................................................................. 65 6.2.7 Aboriginal heritage ..................................................................................................................... 66 6.2.8 Traffic and access ...................................................................................................................... 67 6.2.9 Waste ......................................................................................................................................... 68 6.2.10 Social and visual ........................................................................................................................ 68 6.3 Darlinghurst Road ..................................................................................................... 70 6.3.1 Topography, geology and soils .................................................................................................. 70 6.3.2 Water and drainage ................................................................................................................... 70 6.3.3 Flora and Fauna ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Woolloomooloo-Brochure-170719.Pdf
    Your companion on the road. We make your life stress-free by providing everything you need to create the stay you want. Apartment living with the benefits of a hotel service. stay real. Sydney’s harbour side suburb. Nesuto Woolloomooloo is situated on the Sydney city centre fringe, in the beautiful harbour side suburb of Woolloomooloo, about 900 metres from the heart of Sydney city on the eastern side towards Potts Point. These fabulous serviced-apartments are set in a beautiful heritage listed 4 storey building, located amongst traditional Sydney terrace houses in the tree lined streets of historic Woolloomooloo, a 3-minute walk from the restaurants and bars at Finger Wharf and the legendary Harry’s Cafe de Wheels. Nesuto Woolloomooloo Sydney Apartment Hotel offers a range of self-contained Studio, One, Two and Three Bedroom Apartments, allowing you to enjoy all the comforts of home whilst providing the convenience of apartment style accommodation, making it ideal for corporate and leisure travellers looking for short term or long stay accommodation within Sydney. Nesuto. stay real. A WELCOMING LIVING SPACE Nesuto Woolloomooloo Sydney Apartment Hotel offers a range of spacious self-contained Studio, One, Two and Three Bedroom Apartments in varying styles and layouts. We offer fully equipped kitchenettes, varied bedding arrangements and spacious living areas, ideal for guests wanting more space, solo travellers, couples, families, corporate workers or larger groups looking for a home away from home experience. Our Two and Three Bedroom apartments, along with some Studio apartments, have full length balconies offering spectacular views of the Sydney CBD cityscape and Sydney Harbour Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3 Precinct and Internal Address System 3.4 Building/Wharf
    22 3.3 Precinct and internal 3.4 Building/Wharf Identification address system Currently Wharf 4/5 has large neon signage Articulating individual venues, arts at the main Hickson Road entry point for companies, tenancies and public facilities the Sydney Theatre Company and Sydney within the overall precinct can be resolved Dance Company. Similar large neon building using the existing Wharf and Pier numbering signage is also located on the north facade and the historical internal and external bay of the finger wharf (in poor condition). numbers and other retained markers and There are also Walsh Bay Signage Code signs within the finger wharf structures. signs identifying vehicle entry points to each The inconsistent use of the terms ‘wharf’, wharf/pier. and ‘pier’ should be addressed and The renovation of Wharf 4/5 removed the corrected prior to development of signage significant large hand painted harbour and mapping. The existing theatres are facing pier numbers ‘4’ and ‘5’ which should well known as Wharf 4/5 whilst the eastern be reinterpreted and installed in a similar finger wharf is referred to as Pier 2/3. location similar to Pier 2/3. The utilitarian Confusion is extended with entries to the and functional nature of these elements east and west sides of Wharf 4/5 individually should be retained or reimagined where signed as Pier 4 and Pier 5. The general use they have been previously removed. of the term ‘wharf’ is encouraged following the more common local terminology of New building, wharf and pier identification ‘finger wharf’, Woolloomooloo Wharf, Manly is to be incorporated into the new works, Wharf etc.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Sydney Submission on the CFFR Affordable Housing Working
    City of Sydney Town Hall House City of Sydney submission 456 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 on the CFFR Affordable Housing Working Group Issues Paper March 2016 Contents Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Context: housing affordability pressures in inner Sydney ...................................................2 The City’s response to the Issues Paper ............................................................................4 Broad-based discussion questions ..................................................................................4 Model 1: Housing loan/bond aggregators .......................................................................6 Model 2: Housing trusts ...................................................................................................7 Model 3: Housing cooperatives .......................................................................................8 Model 4: Impact investing models including social impact bonds ...................................9 Other financial models to consider ................................................................................10 1 / City of Sydney response to the Affordable Housing Working Group Issues Paper Introduction The City of Sydney (the City) welcomes the initiative by the Council on Federal Financial Relations Affordable Housing Working Group (‘the Working Group’) to examine financing and structural reform models that have potential to enable increased
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Report
    Investigation into the cumulative impacts of Seniors Housing in the rural areas of The Hills and Hornsby local government areas 1 November 2019 Contents Glossary of terms ........................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Purpose of the Investigation .............................................................................................. 9 1.2 Project area .................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Project governance ......................................................................................................... 13 1.3.1 Project control group terms of reference .................................................................. 13 1.4 Project approach ............................................................................................................. 13 2 About the Seniors Housing SEPP .......................................................................................... 15 2.1 Key provisions in the Seniors Housing SEPP ................................................................. 15 3 Context .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric to Reality: Devolving Decision-Making to Aboriginal Communities RESEARCH & EVALUATION
    Rhetoric to reality: Devolving decision-making to Aboriginal communities RESEARCH & EVALUATION Published by: NSW Aboriginal Affairs, Department of Education, 35 Bridge Street SYDNEY NSW 2001 Tel: 1800 019 998 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aboriginalaffairs.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978-0-9585971-6-6 Copyright June 2017 Suggested citation: Andrew, L., Cipants, J., Heriot, S., Monument, P., ARTIST RECOGNITION (COVER) Pollard, G., and Stibbard, P. (2017). Rhetoric to Kim Healey is a descendant of the Bundjalung and Reality: Devolving decision-making to Aboriginal Gumbaynggirr nations, and also a descendant of the communities. Sydney: NSW Aboriginal Affairs, Djunbun (Platypus) Clan, original custodians of the Department of Education. Washpool at Lionsville in Northern NSW. She currently lives within Country in South Grafton NSW, creating and Acknowledgements telling her stories along the mighty Clarence River. Kim This report was prepared by students as part strives to capture Country and utilise her voice through of the Work Based Project in partial fulfilment of her work, to interpret the world around her. the Executive Master of Public Administration This work captures Kim Healey’s connection to Country. degree at the Australia and New Zealand School It speaks of the Bundjalung and Gumbaynggirr nations of Government (ANZSOG). NSW Aboriginal which were created by the Yuladarah, the creator of Affairs contributed in-kind support for the study. rivers, boundaries and tribal land. This is the Clarence ANZSOG permission to publish is gratefully River boundary with Susan Island in the middle of these acknowledged. two tribes which is a birthing place. Using a sgraffito technique, scribing in the sandy medium is a mapping The report was made possible with the system of Country.
    [Show full text]
  • Barangaroo (Formerly East Darling Harbour): MP06 0162 MOD 4 (Hotel Development, Additional GFA and Height)
    PO Box 484 North Sydney NSW 2059 T: 02 8904 1011 F: 02 8904 1133 E: [email protected] Planning Institute of Australia (NSW Division) Submission: Barangaroo (formerly East Darling Harbour): MP06_0162 MOD 4 (Hotel development, additional GFA and Height) The Planning Institute of Australia (PIA) is the peak body representing professionals involved in planning Australian cities, towns and regions. The Institute has around 4,500 members nationally and around 1,300 members in New South Wales. PIA NSW plays key roles in promoting and supporting the planning profession within NSW and advocating key planning and public policy issues. Introduction The Planning Institute of Australia (NSW Division) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposed amendment for the approved Concept Plan for Barangaroo on Public Exhibition between 11 August 2010 and 10 September 2010. This submission has been prepared by members of PIA on behalf of the Institute. The Institute has made a previous submission on the Barangaroo proposals directly to the Barangaroo Delivery Authority, following the on-site public display within the Old Ports Building at Millers Point, earlier this year. This submission was prepared as a letter to the Chief Executive Officer of the Delivery Authority, dated 15 April 2010. A copy of this letter is included as an Attachment to this submission. Institute members have also more recently attended the Community Forums on Barangaroo organised by the Barangaroo Delivery Authority in May 2010 and also the current public exhibition display at the City of Sydney Council, One Stop Shop. The comments below relate to the proposed Amendment to the Concept Plan for Barangaroo currently on Public Exhibition.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Housing More Affordable
    MAKING HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE Housing Affordability Task Force Urban Development Institute of Australia NSW At the beginning of 2017, the Urban Development Institute of Australia NSW (UDIA NSW) established a Housing Affordability Task Force to deliver an action plan aimed at addressing the housing affordability crisis in NSW. UDIA NSW would like to thank the task force members for their input into the action plan. UDIA NSW Housing Affordability Task Force Members Mike Scott (Chair), The Treadstone Company Arthur Ilias, Lendlease / UDIA NSW President Nicole Woodrow, Task Force Program Manager Stephen Abolakian, Hyecorp Toby Adams, Charter Keck Cramer Gerry Beasley, Walker Corporation Michael Corcoran, UDIA National President Rod Fehring, Frasers Property Australia Andrea Galloway, Evolve Housing Ian Harrison, St George Bank Shane Geha, EG Property Peter Howman, Development Services Advisory Toby Long, Mirvac Jennifer Macquarie, The Housing Trust Richard Rhydderch, Stockland Dominic Sullivan, Payce Nick Tobin, Aqualand Sara Watts, City West Housing Officers Steve Mann, UDIA CEO Justin Drew, UDIA NSW GM Policy and Corporate Affairs MAKING HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE 1 CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 2 Purpose 3 The Problem – Aligning Supply and Demand 3.1 Housing Supply Drivers 3.2 Housing Demand 3.3 Identification of the Problem – Housing Supply and Affordability Reform 4 The Solution – Fix the Housing Supply Chain 4.1 Co-ordination of Housing Supply and Supporting Infrastructure 4.2 Diversity 4.3 Productivity and Efficiency 4.3.1 Uncertain Timeframes
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessments in Heritage Planning in New South Wales
    The Johnstone Centre Report Nº 184 Risk Assessments in Heritage Planning in New South Wales A Rapid Survey of Conservation Management Plans written in 1997–2002 by Dirk HR Spennemann Albury 2003 © Dirk H.R. Spennemann 2003 All rights reserved. The contents of this book are copyright in all countries sub- scribing to the Berne Convention. No parts of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the author, except where permitted by law. CIP DATA Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1958–) Risk Assessments in Heritage Planning in New South Wales. A Rapid Survey of the Conservation Management Plans written in 1997–2002 / by Dirk H.R. Spennemann Johnstone Centre Report nº 184 Albury, N.S.W.: The Johnstone Centre, Charles Sturt University 1v.; ISBN 1 86467 136 X LCC HV551.A8 S* 2003 DDC 363.34525 1. Emergency Management—Australia—New South Wales; 2. Historic Preservation—Australia—New South Wales; 3. Historic Preservation—Emergency Management ii Contents Contents ...................................................................................................iii Introduction..............................................................................................4 Methodology............................................................................................5 The Sampling Frame.....................................................................5 Methodology..................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Waverley Park and Pavilion Plan of Management 2012 - 2022
    Waverley Park and Pavilion Plan of Management 2012 - 2022 Waverley Park and Pavilion Plan of Management 2012 - 2022 Prepared by Waverley Council Waverley Park and Pavilion Plan of Management 2012 - 2022 Prepared by Waverley Council Contents CARING FOR COUNTRY LOOKING AND FEELING GOOD This Plan of Management Amenity was prepared by the OUR PARK AND PAVILION Recreation Community Community Engagement FAIR ACCESS TO FACILITIES Planning & Partnerships Plan Process Leases and Licences Division of Waverley Document Structure Commercial Activities Permitted Activities Council PLAN OF MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW VISION Vision MASTER PLAN Key Objectives BACKGROUND ACTION PLANS Enhancing the Environment Purpose of this Plan Celebrating the Past What is a Plan of Management? Playing and Relaxing Why is one needed? Participating Action Plan Where does the Plan fit? Looking and Feeling Good Crown Land Fair Access to Facilities Legislation and Planning Context Context APPENDICES Location 1. Reserve Profile Site Description 2. Cadastre Information Key Elements and Features 3. Waverley LEP 2011 Landscape Description and 4. Legislation & Planning Context Character 5. Pavilion Internal Layout 6. Condition of Land and Structures VALUES 7. Key Stakeholders Identifying values 8. Community Consultation State, Regional and Local Values 9. Circulation Map Crown Lands Act 10. Zoning Map Metropolitan Plan 11. List of Heritage Items Waverley Together 2 12. Map of Reservoirs Key Values for Waverley Park and 13. Biodiversity Study Pavilion 14. Biodiversity Corridors 15. Image
    [Show full text]
  • Social Housing: E-Brief
    July 2011 e-brief 8/2011 Social housing by Louise O'Flynn 1. Introduction housing management. 85% of these were public housing, 11% were The phrase social housing is often community housing, 3% were used interchangeably with terms such Aboriginal Housing Office dwellings, as 'affordable', 'public' or 'low cost' and 1% was crisis accommodation.4 In housing.1 Social housing is one 2010, there were over 83,000 people mechanism adopted by Local, State on the social housing waiting list in and Commonwealth Governments to NSW.5 address the housing affordability problem in NSW. This e-brief outlines the history of the NSW social housing system and looks Since its introduction in the early at the current situation for the three 1900s, the focus of social housing has social housing subsectors. It also shifted from "supplying affordable considers government social housing properties for rental or home purchase initiatives, briefly outlines the NSW to low and middle income working social housing regulatory framework families, towards providing and highlights several stakeholder accommodation on a priority needs perspectives on the system. basis to households with special needs or in challenging circumstances".2 2. History of the NSW social Today, households in social housing housing system generally have very low incomes; receive a government pension as their The provision of social housing in main source of income; are mostly NSW has changed considerably over single persons; and are older than the its life.6 It has transitioned from population in general.3 housing for low income working families in the early 1900s to a social The current NSW social housing housing system that involves all levels system encompasses: of government, the not-for-profit sector and other organisations, with the aim Public housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Campbells Cove Promenade the Rocks.Indd
    STATEMENT OF HERITAGE IMPACT Campbells Cove Promenade, The Rocks November 2017 Issue G CAMPBELLS COVE PROMENADE, THE ROCKS ISSUE DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUED BY A Draft for Review 2/01/16 GM B Issued for DA submission 21/12/16 GM C Draft Response to Submissions 28/06/17 GM D Amended Draft 30/06/17 GM E Finalised for Submission 24/07/2017 GL F Update for Submission 21/09/2017 GM G Amended Masterplan for Submission 07/11/2017 GM GBA Heritage Pty Ltd Level 1, 71 York Street Sydney NSW 2000, Australia T: (61) 2 9299 8600 F: (61) 2 9299 8711 E: [email protected] W: www.gbaheritage.com ABN: 56 073 802 730 ACN: 073 802 730 Nominated Architect: Graham Leslie Brooks - NSW Architects Registration 3836 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 REPORT OVERVIEW 4 1.2 REPORT OBJECTIVES 5 2.0 HISTORICAL SUMMARY 9 2.1 BRIEF HISTORY OF THE LOCALITY AND SITE 9 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 12 3.1 URBAN CONTEXT 12 3.2 VIEWS TO AND FROM THE SITE 12 4.0 ESTABLISHED HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SUBJECT SITE 14 4.1 ESTABLISHED SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ROCKS CONSERVATION AREA 14 4.2 ESTABLISHED SIGNIFICANCE OF CAST IRON GATES & RAILINGS 15 4.3 ESTABLISHED SIGNIFICANCE OF HERITAGE ITEMS IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE 16 4.4 CURTILAGE ANALYSIS 20 4.5 ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL 22 5.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL 23 6.0 ASSESSMENT OF HERITAGE IMPACT 25 6.1 INTRODUCTION 25 6.2 RESPONSE TO SUBMISSIONS 25 6.3 OVERVIEW OF THE POTENTIAL HERITAGE IMPACTS 26 6.4 CONSIDERATION OF THE GUIDELINES OF THE NSW HERITAGE DIVISION 26 6.5 EVALUATION AGAINST THE 2014 CMP POLICIES OF CAMPBELL’S STORES 27 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 29 7.1 CONCLUSIONS 29 7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 29 8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY 31 Campbells Cove Promenade Statement of Heritage Impact November 2017 1.0 • consideration of the objectives and recommendations INTRODUCTION outlined in the Conservation Management Plan for The Campbell’s Stores; • requests further consideration be given to redesigning or relocating the boardwalk to reduce the visual and 1.1 REPORT OVERVIEW heritage impacts to the seawall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sydney Harbour Federation Trust 2001-2011
    THE SYDNEY HARBOUR FEDERATION TRUST 2001-2011 ARBOUR H THE SHAPING Copyright © Sydney Harbour Federation Trust 2011 First published 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Sydney Harbour Federation Trust. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction should be addressed to the Director Publications, Sydney Harbour Federation Trust, PO Box 607, Mosman, NSW 2088 or email to [email protected] For more information about the Sydney Harbour Federation Trust, visit the website at www.harbourtrust.gov.au Text: Patrick Fletcher Design: Trademark Design Consultants ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Paintings, illustrations, drawings: Nick Hollo, Rod Simpson, Richard Leplastrier Photographs: Sydney Harbour Federation Trust, Ashley Mackevicius, Simon Kenny, Chris Gleisner, Andrew Jacobs, Robert Edwards, Muscle Marketing, The Tea Room, Leading Initiatives Worldwide, Land’s Edge, The Daily Telegraph, State Library of New South Wales, Australian War Memorial. ISBN: 978-0-9757842-8-0 SYdneY HARBOUR and Its FOReshoRes HAVE BEEN CONTESTED GROUND SINCE the ARRIVal OF EUROPeans. We may speculate that the In 2007, the Government, with resources of the harbour and the bipartisan support, extended the shelter provided by its headlands, life of the Trust from 2011 to 2033. beaches and bays were contested At the same time, the Trust has by Aboriginal clans of the Sydney become a self funding agency, region over great expanses of time. dependent for its operational costs on revenue from leasing and When the Sydney Harbour licensing activities. Federation Trust was established as an interim body in 1999 to The future holds many challenges manage former defence and other for the Trust.
    [Show full text]