DOCSLIB.ORG

Peacekeeping

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Peacekeeping GOVT333, Spring 2010 Professor Lise Morjé Howard Tuesdays, 2:15-4:05 Room: ICC 231 Office Hours: Tuesdays, 10-12, 3240 Prospect St. (Street Level) and by appointment email: [email protected] This seminar will explore historical and recent developments in peacekeeping, focusing primarily on UN peacekeeping, but also examining the U.S., NATO and other regional organizations. We will begin by studying the origins of peacekeeping, peacebuilding, and issues of multilateral intervention in civil wars. We will survey contrasting cases of success and failure in multidimensional peacekeeping in civil wars, in an effort to determine which factors were the most important determinants of the outcomes of the operations. We will then explore contemporary U.S. interest in peacekeeping, regional peacekeeping efforts, and some recent cases such as Afghanistan and Iraq. Finally, we will examine current debates in peacekeeping including whether force should be used, the “responsibility to protect,” and attempts to reform and improve the UN’s capacity to keep the peace. Course Requirements: Attendance is mandatory. More than two absences may lead to a failing participation grade. Assigned readings must be completed before class. Active participation in discussion and debates is expected and will account for a large part of your grade (15 percent). Each student will be responsible for preparing discussion questions with a partner once during the semester (15 percent of grade). There will be three one-page writing assignments (15 percent), a 10-12 page research paper (30 percent), and a take home final exam (25 percent). No laptops in class unless by permission of instrtuctor. Required Readings: Lise M. Howard. UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars. Cambridge University Press, 2008. All other readings are available on Blackboard. 1 2 I) Overview of Peacekeeping, Multilateral Intervention, and Civil War January 19 Introduction to the Course January 26 Introduction to the UN System and Peacekeeping Boutros Boutros-Ghali. An Agenda for Peace. New York: United Nations, 1992. (Read especially sections that define peacemaking, peacekeeping, and peace-enforcement.) Edward Luttwak. “Give War a Chance.” Foreign Affairs, July/August 1999, pp.36-44. Chester Crocker. “A Poor Case for Quitting.” (Response to Luttwak) Foreign Affairs, Jan/Feb 2000, pp. 183-86. Lise Howard. “Chapter 1, Introduction: Success, Failure, and Organizational Learning.” UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars, Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 1-20. February 2 Peacekeeping and Peacebuilding Analysis #1 due on the Paris reading V. Page Fortna and Lise Howard “Pitfalls and Progress in the Peacekeeping Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 11, January, 2008, pp. 283-302. Michael Doyle and Nicholas Sambanis. "International Peacebuilding" A Theoretical and Quantitative Analysis." American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 4, December 2000, pp. 779-801. Roland Paris. “Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism.” International Security, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1997, pp. 54-89. Volker C. Franke and Andrea Warnecke. “Building peace: an inventory of UN Peace Missions since the end of the Cold War.” International Peacekeeping, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2009, pp. 407-436. 3 February 9 Civil War Termination Roy Licklider “The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars.” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, No. 3., 1995, pp. 681-690. I. William Zartman. “Negotiating Internal Conflict: Incentives and Intractability.” International Negotiation, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2001, pp. 297-302. Barbara Walter. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement.” International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1997, pp. 335-364. Virginia Page Fortna. “Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace After Civil War.” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 2, June 2004, pp. 269-292. February 16 No Class Paper Topics Due II) Cases of UN Success, Failure, and Mixed Results February 23 Namibia and Rwanda Lise Morjé Howard. “UN Peace Implementation in Namibia: The Causes of Success.” International Peacekeeping, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2002, pp. 99-132. Marrack Goulding. “Namibia.” Peacemonger. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003, pp. 139-175. J. Matthew Vaccaro. “The Politics of Genocide: Peacekeeping and Disaster Relief in Rwanda.” In UN Peacekeeping, American Policy, and the Uncivil Wars of the 1990s. William Durch, ed., 1996, pp. 367-408. 4 Michael Barnett. “The UN Security Council, Indifference, and Genocide in Rwanda.” Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1997, pp. 551-578. Lise Howard. “The failures: Somalia, Rwanda, Angola, Bosnia.” UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars, Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 28-35 (on Rwanda). March 2 Cambodia and East Timor Lise Morjé Howard, “Cambodia: Organizational Dysfunction, Partial Learning, and Mixed Success.” UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars, 2008, pp. 131-178. Lise Morjé Howard, “East Timor: The UN as State.” In UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars, 2008, pp. 260-298. Aurel Croissant. “The Perils and Promises of Democratization through United Nations Transitional Authority - Lessons from Cambodia and East Timor.” Democratization, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2008, pp. 649-668. Nicolas Lemay-Hebert. UNPOL and Police Reform in Timor-Leste: Accomplishments and Setbacks.” International Peacekeeping, Vol. 16, No, 3, 2009, pp. 393-406 March 9 Spring Break III) The U.S. and Peacekeeping March 16 The early U.S. - led operations: Somalia, Haiti, and Iraq I Analysis #2 due on the Fearon and Laitin reading David Laitin. “Somalia: Civil War and International Intervention.” In Barbara Walter and Jack Snyder, eds., Civil Wars, Insecurity and Intervention. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999, pp. 146-180. Lise Howard. “The failures: Somalia, Rwanda, Angola, Bosnia.” UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars, Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 21-28 (on Somalia). 5 James Dobbins et. al. “Haiti.” In America’s Role In Nation-Building: From Germany to Iraq. Washington DC: Rand, 2003, pp. 71-86. David Malone. “Goodbye UNSCOM: A Sorry Tale in US-UN Relations,” Security Dialogue, Vol. 30, No. 4,1999, pp. 393-411. Ivo Daalder. “Knowing When to Say No: The Development of US Policy for Peacekeeping.” In UN Peacekeeping, American Policy, and the Uncivil Wars of the 1990s. William Durch, ed., 1996, pp. 35-68. James Fearon and David Laitin. “Neotrusteeships and the Problem of Weak States.” International Security, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2004, pp. 5-43. March 19 Optional Rough Drafts Due March 23 Contemporary U.S-UN relations (Iraq II and Afghanistan) Nora Bensahel. “Mission Not Accomplished: What Went Wrong with Iraqi Reconstruction.” The Journal of Strategic Studies. Vol. 29, No. 3, 2006, pp. 453-473. Barnett Rubin and Humayun Hamidzada. “From Bonn to London: Governance Challenges and the Future of Statebuilding in Afghanistan.” International Peacekeeping. Vol. 14, No. 1, 2007, pp. 8-25. Catherine Dale. “War in Afghanistan: Strategy, Military Operations, and Issues for Congress.” Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, January 23, 2009, pp. 1-75 (skim most, focus on sections on NATO). Stewart Patrick. “A Return to Realism? The United States and Global Peace Operations since 9/11.” International Peacekeeping, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2008, pp.133-148. VI) Regional Organizations and Peacekeeping 6 March 30 Africa Analysis #3 due on the Howe reading Alex Bellamy and Paul Williams. “Who’s Keeping the Peace? Regionalization and Contemporary Peace Operations.” International Security, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2005, pp. 157-195. Herbert Howe. “Lessons of Liberia: ECOMOG and Regional Peacekeeping.” International Security, Vol 21, No. 3. 1996-97, pp. 145-176. Andrew Natsios. “Beyond Darfur.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 3, 2008, pp.77-93. Paul Williams. “Into the Mogadishu Maelstrom: The African Union Mission in Somalia.” International Peacekeeping, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2009, pp.514-530. Denis Tull. “Peacekeeping in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Waging Peace and Fighting War.” International Peacekeeping, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2009, pp. 215-230. April 6 Europe Class Debate: NATO Should become a Global Organization Ivo Daalder and James Goldgeier. “Global NATO.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 5, 2006, p105-113. Zbigniew Brzezinski. “An Agenda for NATO: Toward a Global Security Web.” Foreign Affairs.Vol. 88, No. 5, 2009, pp. 2-21. Emanuel Adler. “The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation.” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2008, pp.195-230. Dmitri Trenin. “NATO and Russia: Partnership or Peril?” Current History. Vol. 108, No. 720, 2009, pp. 299-304. See also debate “Should NATO support UN peacekeeping operations?” http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2005/issue2/english/debate.html 7 V) Contemporary Issues in Peacekeeping April 13 The Responsibility to Protect International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS), “The Responsibility to Protect.” December 2001, pp. 1-75. (skim) Evans, Gareth and Mohamed Sahnoun. "The Responsibility to Protect" Foreign Affairs. November/December, 2002. Victoria Holt and Tobias Berkman. “The Impossible Mandate: Military Preparedness, the Responsibility to Protect and Modern Peace Operations.” Washington, DC, The Henry L. Stimson Center, 2006, pp. 1-56, 179-200. Alex De Waal, “Darfur and the Failure of the Responsibility to Protect.” International Affairs, Vol 83, No. 6, 2007, pp. pp. 1039-1054. April 16 Research Papers Due at 4:00 in Professor’s
Recommended publications
  • Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban

    Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban

    Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for University Honors with Distinction by, Brandon Smith May 2005 Oxford, OH ABSTRACT AFGHANISTAN, 1989-1996: BETWEEN THE SOVIETS AND THE TALIBAN by, BRANDON SMITH This paper examines why the Afghan resistance fighters from the war against the Soviets, the mujahideen, were unable to establish a government in the time period between the withdrawal of the Soviet army from Afghanistan in 1989 and the consolidation of power by the Taliban in 1996. A number of conflicting explanations exist regarding Afghanistan’s instability during this time period. This paper argues that the developments in Afghanistan from 1989 to 1996 can be linked to the influence of actors outside Afghanistan, but not to the extent that the choices and actions of individual actors can be overlooked or ignored. Further, the choices and actions of individual actors need not be explained in terms of ancient animosities or historic tendencies, but rather were calculated moves to secure power. In support of this argument, international, national, and individual level factors are examined. ii Afghanistan, 1989-1996: Between the Soviets and the Taliban by, Brandon Smith Approved by: _________________________, Advisor Karen L. Dawisha _________________________, Reader John M. Rothgeb, Jr. _________________________, Reader Homayun Sidky Accepted by: ________________________, Director, University Honors Program iii Thanks to Karen Dawisha for her guidance and willingness to help on her year off, and to John Rothgeb and Homayun Sidky for taking the time to read the final draft and offer their feedback.
  • Reconfiguring a Region

    Reconfiguring a Region

    RECONFIGURING A REGION Opportunities and Challenges in the Middle East Hosted by the Council on Middle East Studies at the MacMillan Center at Yale University September 26‐27, 2008 Luce Hall Auditorium, 34 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT Friday, September 26 1:00 pm Opening Remarks and Overview Marcia Inhorn William K. Lanman Jr. Professor of Anthropology and International Affairs Chair of the Council of Middle East Studies (CMES) at the MacMillan Center 1:30 pm Peacemaking in the 21st Century: have the terms changed? Shibley Telhami Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development, University of Maryland and Senior Fellow, Saban Center at the Brookings Institution Daoud Kuttab Award winning Palestinian journalist, former Ferris professor of journalism at Princeton University and Executive Director of the Community Media Network. Avi Shlaim Professor of International Relations, University of Oxford, and Fellow, St. Antony’s College Moderator: Asli Bali, Assistant Professor, University of California Los Angeles School of Law and Research Affiliate, Yale University Law School 3:30 pm Testing the Grounds for East‐West Relations: LeBanon and Syria in Flux Paul Salem Director, Middle East Center, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Murhaf Jouejati Professor of Middle East Studies, Near East South Asia Center for Strategic Studies, National Defense University and Adjunct Scholar, Middle East Institute Marwan Khawaja Director, Center for Research on Population and Health, American University in Beirut Moderator: Sulayman Dib‐Hajj, Research
  • The Fragmentation of Afghan

    The Fragmentation of Afghan

    The Fragmentation of Afghanistan: State Formation and Collapse in the Int... http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/resources/transcripts/140.html/:pf_printable? The Fragmentation of Afghanistan: State Formation and Collapse in the International System Barnett Rubin , Joanne J. Myers June 25, 2002 Introduction Remarks Questions and Answers Introduction JOANNE MYERS: On behalf of the Carnegie Council, I would like to welcome members and guests to our Author in the Afternoon. We're extremely pleased to have with us Barnett Rubin, author of The Fragmentation of Afghanistan. The Fragmentation of Afghanistan When I first began to plan the programs for last fall, it would have been unimaginable to predict the nature of the journeys taken since that time. As this year comes to a close, it seems appropriate that our last program before we adjourn for the summer should focus on Afghanistan. After all, it is the country where years of misrule and abuse of power provided the fertile ground from which the terrorists were able to prepare and plan the horrifying attacks of last fall. September 11th was a defining moment for all of us, and the war on terrorism which followed dramatically influenced our planning for this year's programs. Nine months have passed since that time, but nowhere in the world has a country been changed more than Afghanistan. Although Afghanistan appears to be moving in a better direction, the task of rebuilding this country is far from complete. As we struggle to understand the events taking place there today, it is instructive to examine this nation's history in the hope that we will learn from our past mistakes and be able to participate more constructively in its future.
  • Afghanistan: State and Society, Great Power Politics, and the Way Ahead Findings from an International Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2007

    Afghanistan: State and Society, Great Power Politics, and the Way Ahead Findings from an International Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2007

    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Center for Middle East Public Policy View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation conference proceedings series. RAND conference proceedings present a collection of papers delivered at a conference. The papers herein have been commented on by the conference attendees and both the in- troduction and collection itself have been reviewed and approved by RAND Science and Technology.
  • Book Review: Afghanistan from the Cold War Through the War on Terror

    Book Review: Afghanistan from the Cold War Through the War on Terror

    Book Review: Afghanistan from the Cold War through the War on Terror by Barnett R. Rubin provided by LSE Research Online View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE brought to you by blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2014/01/24/book-review-afghanistan-from-the-cold-war-barnett-rubin/ Barnett R. Rubin’s Afghanistan From the Cold War through the War on Terror is an essential read for those interested not only in the socio-economic and political history of Afghanistan but also for those interested in the role that foreign powers can have on a state, writes Samaya Borom. Essays cover human rights, security, the narcotics trade, and post-conflict statebuilding. Afghanistan from the Cold War through the War on Terror. Barnett R Rubin. Oxford University Press. April 2013. Find this book: Not long after the 24th of September 2001, a Central Intelligence Agency operative carried $3 million in cash into the Panjshir Valley to disperse money to Afghan commanders to try to overthrow the Taliban and to ensure strategic alliance with the United States. After the funds were initially dispersed, the CIA Counterterrorist Center dispatched $10 million more and as the cashed up commanders exchanged their USD funds for local currency they flooded the market, devalued the dollar and effectively crippled Afghanistan’s economy. The insights revealed throughout Barnett Rubin’s Afghanistan, from the Cold War through the War on Terror come from essays collated over more than a decade whilst Rubin was employed by the Council of Foreign Relations and the Center on International Cooperation at New York University, and crucially while he was also acting as a consultant to the United Nations mission to Afghanistan.
  • The Future of Afghanistan

    The Future of Afghanistan

    Thier The Future of Afghanistan The of Afghanistan Future J Alexander Thier editor United States Institute of Peace The Future of Afghanistan Thier-Afghanistan-2a rev.indd 1 12/17/08 11:24:43 AM Thier-Afghanistan-2a rev.indd 2 12/17/08 11:24:43 AM The Future of Afghanistan J Alexander Thier editor UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE Was H in G ton , D.C. Thier-Afghanistan-2a rev.indd 3 12/17/08 11:24:43 AM The views expressed in this book are those of the author alone. They do not necessarily reflect views of the United States Institute of Peace. UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE 1200 17th Street, NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036-3011 www.usip.org © 2009 by the Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace. All rights reserved. First published 2009 To request permission to photocopy or reprint materials for course use, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com. For print, electronic media, and all other subsidiary rights, e-mail: [email protected]. Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standards for Information Science—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Thier-Afghanistan-2a rev.indd 4 12/17/08 11:24:43 AM Contents Acknowledgments v Map of Afghanistan vi 1. Introduction: Building Bridges 1 J Alexander Thier 2. The Transformation of the Afghan State 13 Barnett R. Rubin 3. The Future of Security Institutions 23 Ali A. Jalali 4.
  • 英語版 講演録 Seminar Report

    英語版 講演録 Seminar Report

    英語版 講演録 Seminar Report: English Version Program JICA IFIC Seminar Afghanistan’s future from regional perspectives Afghanistan’s political process stated in Bon Agreement has ended in 2005 and the renewed framework for Afghanistan’s reconstruction, Interim Afghanistan National Development Strategy, has been announced at London in January, 2006. Afghanistan government and partner countries including Japan have stepped in the full-scale development stage. On the other hand, Afghanistan holds formidable obstacles for steady economic development such as growing trend of opium production, deteriorating security conditions especially in southern and east- southern areas, glacial progress on governance rebuilding, etc. Those issues demand us, international partners, to have regional perspectives towards Afghanistan when we try to find out the effective solutions for them, because Afghanistan is located at the cross road of South-West Asia, Central Asia and Middle East and has a long history of interactions and interchanges of the people with these surrounding countries. This seminar focuses on how International partners can hold a sound observation on the regional context about Afghanistan’s today and the future, and how we can make the better contibution to sustainable development of Afghanistan based on such observation. Program e Date: 14:00 – 18:30, March 22, 2007 e Venue: 2nd floor, Institute for International Cooperation, Japan International Cooperation Agency 10-5, Ichigaya Honmura-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8433 * Language: Japanese and English 13:30 – 14:00 Registration 14:00 – 14:15 Opening Address: Mr. Kazuhisa Matsuoka, Vice President, JICA 14:15 – 15:05 Keynote Speech: “Afghanistan’s future in the Region and the World” Dr.
  • Degradation of the Environment As the Cause of Violent Conflict

    Degradation of the Environment As the Cause of Violent Conflict

    Mohamed Sahnoun, Algeria. A thematic essay which speaks to Principle 16 on using the Earth Charter to resolve the root causes of violent conflict in Africa Degradation of the Environment as the Cause of Violent Conflict Mohamed Sahnoun has had a distinguished diplo- water and grazing land. Before, the fighting was with sticks; matic career serving as Adviser to the President of now it is with Kalashnikovs. That is the terrible thing about it. Algeria on diplomatic affairs, Deputy Secretary- There is no difference there; they are the same people. General of the Organization of African Unity (OAU), and Deputy Secretary-General of the League of I am often a witness in my work of the linkage between the Arab States in charge of the Arab-Africa dialogue. degradation of the environment and the spread of violent con- He has served as Algeria’s Ambassador to the flicts. We tend to underestimate the impact of degradation of United States, France, Germany, and Morocco, as well as to the United the environment on human security everywhere. Repeated Nations (UN). Mr. Sahnoun is currently Secretary General Kofi Annan’s droughts, land erosion, desertification, and deforestation Special Adviser in the Horn of Africa region. Previously, he served as brought about by climate change and natural disasters compel Special Adviser to the Director General of the United Nations Scientific large groups to move from one area to another, which, in turn, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) for the Culture of Peace increases pressure on scarce resources, and provokes strong Programme, Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on the reaction from local populations.
  • Preventive Diplomacy and Ethnic Conflict: Possible, Difficult, Necessary

    Preventive Diplomacy and Ethnic Conflict: Possible, Difficult, Necessary

    ISSN 1088-2081 Preventive Diplomacy and Ethnic Conflict: Possible, Difficult, Necessary Bruce W. Jentleson University of California, Davis Policy Paper # 27 June 1996 The author and IGCC are grateful to the Pew Charitable Trusts for generous support of this project. Author’s opinions are his own. Copyright © 1996 by the Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation CONTENTS Defining Preventive Diplomacy ........................................................................................5 CONCEPTUAL PARAMETERS FOR A WORKING DEFINITION....................................................6 METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN MEASURING SUCCESS AND FAILURE.....................8 The Possibility of Preventive Diplomacy .........................................................................8 THE PURPOSIVE SOURCES OF ETHNIC CONFLICT ..................................................................8 CASE EVIDENCE OF OPPORTUNITIES MISSED........................................................................9 CASE EVIDENCE OF SUCCESSFUL PREVENTIVE DIPLOMACY ...............................................11 SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................12 Possible, but Difficult.......................................................................................................12 EARLY WARNING................................................................................................................12 POLITICAL WILL .................................................................................................................14
  • Central Asia and the Caucasus: a Vulnerable Crescent

    Central Asia and the Caucasus: a Vulnerable Crescent

    Central Asia and the Caucasus: A Vulnerable Crescent Coping with Crisis Working Paper Series Thomas de Waal and Anna Matveeva February 2007 International Peace Academy About the Author Thomas de Waal is Caucasus Editor at the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, London and writes about the Caucasus and Russia. He completed a degree in Russian and Modern Greek at Oxford, before working for the BBC, The Moscow Times and The Times in London and Moscow. He is co-author with Carlotta Gall of Chechnya: A Small Victorious War, and is author of Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War, the first thorough book in English about the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. He writes and broadcasts for a number of media outlets. Anna Matveeva is an Associate Fellow at the Crisis States Research Centre at the London School of Economics. She has previously worked as a UNDP Regional Adviser on Peace and Development for Central Asia, and as a Research Fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. She has published extensively, including a Chaillot Paper for the EU Institute for Security Studies on the “EU Stakes in Central Asia,” a Chatham House Paper on “The North Caucasus: Russia’s Fragile Borderland,” and a recent report for International Alert on “Central Asia: Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding.” Acknowledgements IPA owes a great debt of thanks to its many donors to Coping with Crisis. Their support for this Program reflects a widespread demand for innovative thinking on practical solutions to international challenges. In particular, IPA is grateful to the Governments of Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
  • International Organizations

    International Organizations

    INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY (E.S.A.) Headquarters: 8–10 Rue Mario Nikis, 75738 Paris, CEDEX 15, France phone 011–33–1–5369–7654, fax 011–33–1–5369–7651 Chairman of the Council.—Alain Bensoussan (France). Director General.—Antonio Rodota (Italy). Member Countries: Austria Germany Portugal Belgium Ireland Spain Denmark Italy Sweden Finland Netherlands Switzerland France Norway United Kingdom Cooperative Agreement.—Canada. European Space Operations Center (E.S.O.C.), Robert Bosch-Strasse 5, 61, Darmstadt, Germany, phone 011–49–6151–900, telex: 419453, fax 011–49–6151–90495. European Space Research and Technology Center (E.S.T.E.C.), Keplerlaan 1, 2201, AZ Noordwijk, Zh, Netherlands, phone 011–31–71–565–6565; Telex: 844–39098, fax 011–31–71–565–6040. Information Retrieval Service (E.S.R.I.N.), Via Galileo Galilei, Casella Postale 64, 00044 Frascati, Italy. Phone, 011–39–6–94–18–01; Telex: 610637, fax 011–39–94–180361. Washington Office (E.S.A.), Suite 7800, 955 L’Enfant Plaza SW. 20024. Head of Office.—I.W. Pryke, 488–4158, fax: (202) 488–4930, [email protected]. INTER-AMERICAN DEFENSE BOARD 2600 16th Street 20441, phone 939–6041, fax 939–6620 Chairman.—MG Carl H. Freeman, U.S. Army. Vice Chairman.—Brigadier General Jose´ Mayo, Air Force, Paraguay. Secretary.—Col. Robert P. Warrick, U.S. Air Force. Vice Secretary.—CDR Carlos Luis Rivera Cordova, Navy. Deputy Secretary for Administration.—LTC Frederick J. Holland, U.S. Army. Conference.—Maj. Robert L. Larson, U.S. Army. Finance.—Maj. Stephen D. Zacharczyk, U.S. Army. Information Management.—Maj.
  • State Strengthening in Afghanistan Lessons Learned, 2001–14

    State Strengthening in Afghanistan Lessons Learned, 2001–14

    [PEACEW RKS [ STATE STRENGTHENING IN AFGHANISTAN LESSONS LEARNED, 2001–14 Edited by Scott Smith and Colin Cookman ABOUT THE REPORT In March 2015, the United States Institute of Peace (USIP), Chatham House, and Stanford University held a two-day conference on “State-Strengthening in Afghanistan 2001–2014: Learning from the Past to Inform the Future.” This report comprises a selection of papers presented at the conference. The papers look back critically at thirteen years of international intervention in Afghanistan, focusing on the impact of state- strengthening exercises on security, democratization, governance, the economy, rule of law, infrastructure, civil society participation, youth development, and women’s empowerment. They describe, from the perspective of Afghan and international policy makers and experts, the immense and often unforseen challenges in rebuilding the Afghan state. Cover photo: An Afghan village elder talks to International Security Assistance Forces from atop his home. Nate Derrick/Shutterstock.com. The views expressed in this report are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Peaceworks No. 116. First published 2016. ISBN: 978-1-60127-602-5 © 2016 by the United States Institute of Peace CONTENTS PEACEWORKS • MAY 2016 • NO. 116 Foreword ...3 Summary ...5 Introduction ...7 Statebuilding, Counterinsurgency, and Counterterrorism: Complementary or Contradictory Strategies Thomas Barfield ...9 Military and Civilian Assistance in Afghanistan: An Incoherent Approach Barbara J.