The Sally Walker Conservation Fund at Zoo Outreach Organization to Continue Key Areas of Her Interest
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Great Hornbill Buceros Bicornis, Wreathed Hornbill Aceros Undulatus and Oriental Pied Hornbill Anthracoceros Albirostris
Bird Conservation International (2004) 14:S39–S52. BirdLife International 2004 doi:10.1017/S0959270905000213 Printed in the United Kingdom Nest-site selection and nesting success of three hornbill species in Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India: Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis, Wreathed Hornbill Aceros undulatus and Oriental Pied Hornbill Anthracoceros albirostris APARAJITA DATTA and G. S. RAWAT Summary Nest-site selection by the sympatric Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis, Wreathed Hornbill Aceros undulatus and Oriental Pied Hornbill Anthracoceros albirostris was investigated in a lowland tropical forest in Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India during 1997–2000. Infor- mation on two nests of Rufous-necked Hornbill Aceros nipalensis in higher-elevation forests is also presented. All species nested in live trees of three tree genera, 83% (n = 36) in Tetrameles nudiflora, an emergent deciduous softwood, relatively common in lowland foothill forests. No difference was recorded in nest-tree species or nesting habitats of sympatric hornbills, but there were a few differences in structural characteristics of nest- trees. Cavity size was the main variable separating the three species. Great Hornbills used larger cavities while Oriental Pied Hornbills used smaller cavities closer to riverine areas. Nesting was attempted at 64% of known sites and successful fledging of chicks was 80% overall (n = 72 nests, pooled over 4 years). Nest-trees in disturbed habitats near human habitation were used but were often abandoned or unsuccessful and 50% of all nest-trees were inactive by the end of the study. Potential large nest-trees had a density of 5.9/ha, that of the two most used species was 1.3/ha, and minimum nest densities of all three species was about 1 pair/km2. -
Review and Updated Checklist of Freshwater Fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, Distribution and Conservation Status
Iran. J. Ichthyol. (March 2017), 4(Suppl. 1): 1–114 Received: October 18, 2016 © 2017 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Accepted: February 30, 2017 P-ISSN: 2383-1561; E-ISSN: 2383-0964 doi: 10.7508/iji.2017 http://www.ijichthyol.org Review and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, distribution and conservation status Hamid Reza ESMAEILI1*, Hamidreza MEHRABAN1, Keivan ABBASI2, Yazdan KEIVANY3, Brian W. COAD4 1Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Laboratory, Zoology Section, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran 2Inland Waters Aquaculture Research Center. Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Bandar Anzali, Iran 3Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Division), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran 4Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 6P4 Canada *Email: [email protected] Abstract: This checklist aims to reviews and summarize the results of the systematic and zoogeographical research on the Iranian inland ichthyofauna that has been carried out for more than 200 years. Since the work of J.J. Heckel (1846-1849), the number of valid species has increased significantly and the systematic status of many of the species has changed, and reorganization and updating of the published information has become essential. Here we take the opportunity to provide a new and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran based on literature and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history and new fish collections. This article lists 288 species in 107 genera, 28 families, 22 orders and 3 classes reported from different Iranian basins. However, presence of 23 reported species in Iranian waters needs confirmation by specimens. -
Butterflies-Of-Thailand-Checklist-2018
PAPILIONIDAE Parnassinae: Bhutanitis lidderdalii ocellatomaculata Great Bhutan ผเี สอื้ ภฐู าน Papilioninae: Troides helena cerberus Common Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองป่ าสงู Troides aeacus aeacus Golden Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองธรรมดา Troides aeacus malaiianus Troides amphrysus ruficollis Malayan Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองปักษ์ใต ้ Troides cuneifera paeninsulae Mountain Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองภเู ขา Atrophaneura sycorax egertoni Whitehead Batwing ผเี สอื้ คา้ งคาวหวั ขาว Atrophaneura varuna zaleucus Burmese Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวพมา่ Atrophaneura varuna varuna Malayan Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวมาเลย์ Atrophaneura varuna astorion Common Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวธรรมดา Atrophaneura aidoneus Striped Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวขา้ งแถบ Byasa dasarada barata Great Windmill ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ ใหญ่ Byasa polyeuctes polyeuctes Common Windmill ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ ธรรมดา Byasa crassipes Small Black Windmill ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ เล็กด า Byasa adamsoni adamsoni Adamson's Rose ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ อดัมสนั Byasa adamsoni takakoae Losaria coon doubledayi Common Clubtail ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ หางกวิ่ Losaria neptunus neptunus Yellow-bodied Clubtail ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ กน้ เหลอื ง Losaria neptunus manasukkiti Pachliopta aristolochiae goniopeltis Common Rose ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ จดุ ชมพู Pachliopta aristolochiae asteris Papilio demoleus malayanus Lime Butterfly ผเี สอื้ หนอนมะนาว Papilio demolion demolion Banded Swallowtail ผเี สอื้ หางตงิ่ สะพายขาว Papilio noblei Noble's Helen ผเี สอื้ หางตงิ่ โนเบลิ้ Papilio castor mahadeva Siamese Raven ผเี สอื้ เชงิ ลายมหาเทพสยาม -
Types of American Grasses
z LIBRARY OF Si AS-HITCHCOCK AND AGNES'CHASE 4: SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM oL TiiC. CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE United States National Herbarium Volume XII, Part 3 TXE&3 OF AMERICAN GRASSES . / A STUDY OF THE AMERICAN SPECIES OF GRASSES DESCRIBED BY LINNAEUS, GRONOVIUS, SLOANE, SWARTZ, AND MICHAUX By A. S. HITCHCOCK z rit erV ^-C?^ 1 " WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM Issued June 18, 1908 ii PREFACE The accompanying paper, by Prof. A. S. Hitchcock, Systematic Agrostologist of the United States Department of Agriculture, u entitled Types of American grasses: a study of the American species of grasses described by Linnaeus, Gronovius, Sloane, Swartz, and Michaux," is an important contribution to our knowledge of American grasses. It is regarded as of fundamental importance in the critical sys- tematic investigation of any group of plants that the identity of the species described by earlier authors be determined with certainty. Often this identification can be made only by examining the type specimen, the original description being inconclusive. Under the American code of botanical nomenclature, which has been followed by the author of this paper, "the nomenclatorial t}rpe of a species or subspecies is the specimen to which the describer originally applied the name in publication." The procedure indicated by the American code, namely, to appeal to the type specimen when the original description is insufficient to identify the species, has been much misunderstood by European botanists. It has been taken to mean, in the case of the Linnsean herbarium, for example, that a specimen in that herbarium bearing the same name as a species described by Linnaeus in his Species Plantarum must be taken as the type of that species regardless of all other considerations. -
Hornbills of Borneo
The following two species can be easily confused. They can be recognized If you want to support Hornbill Conservation in Sabah, please contact from other hornbill species by the yellow coloration around the head and neck in Marc Ancrenaz at Hutan Kinabatangan Orangutan Conservation Project: the males. The females have black heads and faces and blue throat pouches. [email protected] HORNBILLS OF BORNEO Wrinkled hornbill (Aceros corrugatus): A large, mainly black hornbill whose tail is mostly white with some black at the base. Males have a yellow bill and more prominent reddish casque while females have an all yellow bill and casque. SABAH MALAYSIA The presence of hornbills in the Kinabatangan area is an indication that the surrounding habitat is healthy. Hornbills need forests for nesting and food. Forests need hornbills for dispersal of seeds. And the local people need the forests for wood Wreathed hornbill (Rhyticeros undulatus): A large, primarily black hornbill products, clean water and clean air. They are all connected: whose tail is all white with no black at the base. Both sexes have a pale bill with a small casque and a dark streak/mark on the throat pouch. people, hornbills and forests! Eight different hornbill species occur in Borneo and all are found in Kinabatangan. All are protected from hunting and/or disturbance. By fostering an awareness and concern of their presence in this region, hornbill conservation will be ensured for future generations. Credits: Sabah Forest Department, Sabah Wildlife Department, Hutan Kinabatangan Orangutan Conserva- tion Project (KOCP), Hornbill Research Foundation, Chester Zoo, Woodland Park Zoo. -
Archiv Für Naturgeschichte
© Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Lepidoptera für 1903. Bearbeitet von Dr. Robert Lucas in Rixdorf bei Berlin. A. Publikationen (Autoren alphabetisch) mit Referaten. Adkin, Robert. Pyrameis cardui, Plusia gamma and Nemophila noc- tuella. The Entomologist, vol. 36. p. 274—276. Agassiz, G. Etüde sur la coloration des ailes des papillons. Lausanne, H. Vallotton u. Toso. 8 °. 31 p. von Aigner-Abafi, A. (1). Variabilität zweier Lepidopterenarten. Verhandlgn. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien, 53. Bd. p. 162—165. I. Argynnis Paphia L. ; IL Larentia bilineata L. — (2). Protoparce convolvuli. Entom. Zeitschr. Guben. 17. Jahrg. p. 22. — (3). Über Mimikry. Gaea. 39. Jhg. p. 166—170, 233—237. — (4). A mimicryröl. Rov. Lapok, vol. X, p. 28—34, 45—53 — (5). A Mimicry. Allat. Kozl. 1902, p. 117—126. — (6). (Über Mimikry). Allgem. Zeitschr. f. Entom. 7. Bd. (Schluß p. 405—409). Über Falterarten, welche auch gesondert von ihrer Umgebung, in ruhendem Zustande eine eigentümliche, das Auge täuschende Form annehmen (Lasiocampa quercifolia [dürres Blatt], Phalera bucephala [zerbrochenes Ästchen], Calocampa exoleta [Stück morschen Holzes]. — [Stabheuschrecke, Acanthoderus]. Raupen, die Meister der Mimikry sind. Nachahmung anderer Tiere. Die Mimik ist in vielen Fällen zwecklos. — Die wenn auch recht geistreichen Mimikry-Theorien sind doch vielleicht nur ein müßiges Spiel der Phantasie. Aitken u. Comber, E. A list of the butterflies of the Konkau. Journ. Bombay Soc. vol. XV. p. 42—55, Suppl. p. 356. Albisson, J. Notes biologiques pour servir ä l'histoire naturelle du Charaxes jasius. Bull. Soc. Etud. Sc. nat. Nimes. T. 30. p. 77—82. Annandale u. Robinson. Siehe unter S w i n h o e. -
Ii \ T MEXICAN GRASSES in the UNITED STATES NATIONAL
■ . ~+j-,r?7-w- - i i - . \ t MEXICAN GRASSES IN THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL HERBARIUM. By A. S, Hitchcock INTRODUCTION. The following list of grasses, based entirely upon specimens in the United States National Herbarium, is a preliminary paper, in which the scattered data upon Mexican grasses have been brought together and arranged in a convenient form. The species included have been accepted, for the most part, in their traditional sense. It has been impracticable to examine the types of many of the earlier described species since these specimens are located in European herbaria. For this reason the synonymy has been confined mostly to those names that could be fixed by an examination of American types, or concerning the application of which there was little doubt. The largest number of unidentified names are found in Fournier's work on Mexican grasses.1 This results from the incomplete or unsatis- factory descriptions and from the fact that the specimens cited under a given species either may not agree with the diagnosis, or may belong to two or more species, at least in different herbaria. An examination of the original specimens will undoubtedly lead to the identification of the greater part of these names. There are several specimens that have been omitted from the list because they have not been identified and are apparently unde- scribed species. They belong to genera, however, that are much in need of critical revision and further study of them is deferred for the present. In subsequent articles it is hoped to work out the classifi- cation of the tropical American grasses upon a type basis KEY TO THE GENEBA. -
Color Plates
Color Plates Plate 1 (a) Lethal Yellowing on Coconut Palm caused by a Phytoplasma Pathogen. (b, c) Tulip Break on Tulip caused by Lily Latent Mosaic Virus. (d, e) Ringspot on Vanda Orchid caused by Vanda Ringspot Virus R.K. Horst, Westcott’s Plant Disease Handbook, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2141-8, 701 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 702 Color Plates Plate 2 (a, b) Rust on Rose caused by Phragmidium mucronatum.(c) Cedar-Apple Rust on Apple caused by Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae Color Plates 703 Plate 3 (a) Cedar-Apple Rust on Cedar caused by Gymnosporangium juniperi.(b) Stunt on Chrysanthemum caused by Chrysanthemum Stunt Viroid. Var. Dark Pink Orchid Queen 704 Color Plates Plate 4 (a) Green Flowers on Chrysanthemum caused by Aster Yellows Phytoplasma. (b) Phyllody on Hydrangea caused by a Phytoplasma Pathogen Color Plates 705 Plate 5 (a, b) Mosaic on Rose caused by Prunus Necrotic Ringspot Virus. (c) Foliar Symptoms on Chrysanthemum (Variety Bonnie Jean) caused by (clockwise from upper left) Chrysanthemum Chlorotic Mottle Viroid, Healthy Leaf, Potato Spindle Tuber Viroid, Chrysanthemum Stunt Viroid, and Potato Spindle Tuber Viroid (Mild Strain) 706 Color Plates Plate 6 (a) Bacterial Leaf Rot on Dieffenbachia caused by Erwinia chrysanthemi.(b) Bacterial Leaf Rot on Philodendron caused by Erwinia chrysanthemi Color Plates 707 Plate 7 (a) Common Leafspot on Boston Ivy caused by Guignardia bidwellii.(b) Crown Gall on Chrysanthemum caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens 708 Color Plates Plate 8 (a) Ringspot on Tomato Fruit caused by Cucumber Mosaic Virus. (b, c) Powdery Mildew on Rose caused by Podosphaera pannosa Color Plates 709 Plate 9 (a) Late Blight on Potato caused by Phytophthora infestans.(b) Powdery Mildew on Begonia caused by Erysiphe cichoracearum.(c) Mosaic on Squash caused by Cucumber Mosaic Virus 710 Color Plates Plate 10 (a) Dollar Spot on Turf caused by Sclerotinia homeocarpa.(b) Copper Injury on Rose caused by sprays containing Copper. -
Predictability of Pathogen Host Range in Biological Control of Weeds
Predictability of pathogen host range in biological control of weeds Jane Barton* *Contractor to Landcare Research New Zealand Why aren’t pathogens used more widely for weed control? . Worldwide, pathogens have only been introduced to 11 countries (Arg, Aus, Chile, China, Fiji, India, NZ, PNG, SAf, Tahiti, USA) . No evidence of pathogen damage in the field that was not predicted by HR testing. Barton, J. (2004) Biological Control 31: 99-122. Methods . List all pathogens ever used for biocontrol of weeds . Find info. on pre-release host range testing . Find info. on their behaviour in the field after release (‘pers. comm.’) . Compare the two to determine how accurate pre-release predictions have been to-date Results (2010) . 37 projects worldwide (each project = intro. of 1 pathogen to 1 country for 1 weed complex) . 28 spp. of pathogens (all fungi) released . > 28 spp. of weeds targeted . Pathogens from 16 countries . Most pathogens have established, spread, and had at least some impact on their target Results (2010): Non-target damage in the field . Out of those 37 projects: . 2 projects with non-target damage in out-door field plots . 2 projects with predicted non- target damage in the field . 33 projects with no non-target damage in the field at all! Target weed: Musk thistle . Carduus nutans ssp. leiophyllus (= C. thoermeri) . Major weed of pastures & rangelands in the USA (competes with pasture) . From Europe & Asia . Control with herbicide not economically feasible Image from http://www.issg.org/database/species/ Puccinia carduorum . Rust fungus (Uredinales: Pucciniaceae) . Attacks C. thoermeri (and many other Carduus spp.) . -
Report on the Butterflies Collected from Chongqing, Shaanxi and Gansu
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 2016 Band/Volume: 47 Autor(en)/Author(s): Huang Si-Yao Artikel/Article: Report on the butterflies collected from Chongqing, Shaanxi and Gansu, China in 2015 (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea, Hesperoidea) 241-248 Atalanta 47 (1/2): 241-248, Marktleuthen (Juli 2016), ISSN 0171-0079 Report on the butterflies collected from Chongqing, Shaanxi and Gansu, China in 2015 (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea, Hesperoidea) by SI-YAO HUANG received 30.III.2016 Abstract: A list of the butterflies collected by the author and his colleague in the Chinese Provinces of Chongqing, S. Shaanxi and S. Gansu in the summer of 2015 is presented. In the summer of 2015, the author accomplished a survey on butterflies at the following localities (fig. A): Chongqing Province: Simianshan, 4th-9thJuly. Shaanxi Province: Liping Natural Reserve, Nanzheng County: 12th-14th July; Danangou, Fengxian County: 31st July; Dongshan, Taibai County: 1st August; Miaowangshan, Fengxian County: 2nd August; Xiaonangou, Fengxian County: 3rd-5th August; Zhufeng, Fengxian County: 5th August. Gansu Province: Xiongmaogou, Xiahe County: 16th-18th July; Laolonggou, Diebu County: 20th July; Meilugou, Die- bu County: 21st July; Tiechiliang, Diebu County: 22nd July; Lazikou, Diebu County: 23rd July; Tiangangou, Zhouqu County: 25th-26th July; Pianpiangou, Zhouqu County: 28th-29th July. A checklist of butterflies collected from Chongqing, Shaanxi and Gansu in 2015 Hesperiidae Coeliadinae 1. Hasora tarminatus (HÜBNER, 1818): 1 † 7-VII, Simianshan, leg. & coll. GUO-XI XUE. Pyrginae 2. Gerosis phisara (MOORE, 1884): 1 †, 6-VII, Simianshan. 3. Celaenorrhinus maculosus (C. & R. -
Notes on Grasses (Poaceae) for the Flora of China, IV
Notes on Grasses (Poaceae) for the Flora of China, IV Sylvia M. Phillips Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AB, United Kingdom. [email protected] Chen Shouliang Herbarium, Jiangsu Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica, 1 Qianghuhuocun, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210014, China. [email protected] ABSTRACT. The following changes are made in the preparation of the grass family account for the Poaceae, necessary for the upcoming Flora of Chi- Flora of China. na. Kengia chinensis is lectotypi®ed on a specimen of K. hackelii, and hence becomes a synonym of the ERAGROSTIDEAE latter. Kengia gracilis is synonymized under K. mu- cronata. Isachne clarkei is lectotypi®ed. Isachne be- Kengia hackelii (Honda) Packer, Bot. Not. 113: neckei (also lectotypi®ed) and I. tenuis are placed 291. 1960. Basionym: Diplachne hackelii Hon- as synonyms of I. clarkei. Isachne albens var. hir- da, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 3, Bot. 3: suta is lectotypi®ed and placed as a synonym under 112. 1930. Cleistogenes hackelii (Honda) Hon- I. sylvestris. Isachne semitalis is lectotypi®ed and da, Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 50: 437. 1936. TYPE: placed in synonymy of I. schmidtii. The distinctions Japan. Musashi Prov., Shirako, 1880, Matsu- between the closely related species I. kunthiana, I. mura 4 (holotype, TI). schmidtii, and I. repens are discussed. The new spe- Kengia chinensis (Maximowicz) Packer, Bot. Not. 113: cies Arundinella suniana, from Yunnan province 291. 1960. Basionym: Diplachne serotina var. chi- and related to A. setosa, is described. Arundinella nensis Maximowicz, Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes setosa var. esetosa is validated. The name Arundi- Moscou 54: 70. -
Current Status of Research on Rust Fungi (Pucciniales) in India
Asian Journal of Mycology 4(1): 40–80 (2021) ISSN 2651-1339 www.asianjournalofmycology.org Article Doi 10.5943/ajom/4/1/5 Current status of research on Rust fungi (Pucciniales) in India Gautam AK1, Avasthi S2, Verma RK3, Devadatha B 4, Sushma5, Ranadive KR 6, Bhadauria R2, Prasher IB7 and Kashyap PL8 1School of Agriculture, Abhilashi University, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, India 2School of Studies in Botany, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India 3Department of Plant Pathology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India 4 Fungal Biotechnology Lab, Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India 5Department of Biosciences, Chandigarh University Gharuan, Punjab, India 6Department of Botany, P.D.E.A.’s Annasaheb Magar Mahavidyalaya, Mahadevnagar, Hadapsar, Pune, Maharashtra, India 7Department of Botany, Mycology and Plant Pathology Laboratory, Panjab University Chandigarh, India 8ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Karnal, Haryana, India Gautam AK, Avasthi S, Verma RK, Devadatha B, Sushma, Ranadive KR, Bhadauria R, Prasher IB, Kashyap PL 2021 – Current status of research on Rust fungi (Pucciniales) in India. Asian Journal of Mycology 4(1), 40–80, Doi 10.5943/ajom/4/1/5 Abstract Rust fungi show unique systematic characteristics among all fungal groups. A single species of rust fungi may produce up to five morphologically and cytologically distinct spore-producing structures thereby attracting the interest of mycologist for centuries. In India, the research on rust fungi started with the arrival of foreign visiting scientists or emigrant experts, mainly from Britain who collected fungi and sent specimens to European laboratories for identification. Later on, a number of mycologists from India and abroad studied Indian rust fungi and contributed a lot to knowledge of the rusts to the Indian Mycobiota.