「Citizenship Report 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2015 Hawaii Sister-State Annual Report
State of Hawaii’s Sister-States Business Development & Support Division Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism December 2017 A Report to the Legislature of the State of Hawaii as Required by Act 150, SLH 2006 2017 HAWAII’S SISTER-STATES REPORT HAWAII’S SISTER-STATE PROGRAM The Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism (DBEDT) has established close working relationships with foreign governments and non-governmental organizations, federal agencies and national organizations. These relationships serve to raise Hawaii’s profile internationally, attract dynamic cooperative programs and stimulate Hawaii’s economy. Many of these projects fall under DBEDT’s Sister-State program. In 1993, DBEDT recognized in a report that in establishing sister relationships, economic benefit should be co-equal to the “historic purposes of friendship, cultural ties, and goodwill.” Consequently, any Sister-State relationship must provide for clear economic benefits. Hawaii’s Sister-State Policy was based on the following criteria: • Strong evidence of interest by the potential Sister-State. • Clear prospects for mutual economic advantage. • Substantial grassroots support for the relationship. • A strong record of activities. • Potential for expanded cultural, educational and government exchanges. The report went on to state that: • Sister-State relationships are partnerships between governments, but require active and ongoing participation by the private sector to sustain the relationship. • Because the State’s capacity to manage Sister-State relationships is finite, a means of terminating moribund or defunct relationships should be provided. SISTER-STATES PROCESS The following is the process for establishing a Sister-State relationship: • A detailed application form will be provided after initial consultation with DBEDT regarding a proposed relationship. -
Report on the Symposium in FY 2019 “To Make the Shikoku Henro A
Report on the Symposium in FY 2019 Many Minds Many Hearts One Shikoku “To Make the Shikoku Henro a World Heritage Site” International Symposium Date and Time: Saturday, January 25, 2020. 1:15~4:30 p.m. Venue: Ehime University Nanka Memorial Hall (3, Bunkyo-cho, Matsuyama City, Ehime Prefecture) Program: ■ Keynote Report: What Is the Outstanding Universal Value of the Shikoku Henro? Akihiro Kinda (Kyoto Institute, Library and Archives, Kyoto Prefectural University) ■ Keynote Lecture: Trends of World Cultural Heritage Program and Asian Pilgrimage Gamini Wijesuriya (former Project Manager, ICCROM) ■ Panel Discussion: The Value of the Shikoku Henro and Challenges in Its Inscription on the World Heritage List Facilitator: Nobuko Inaba (Professor, University of Tsukuba) Panelists: Gamini Wijesuriya (former Project Manager, ICCROM,) Chihei Suzuki (Senior Cultural Properties Specialist, Office for International Cooperation on Cultural Heritages, Cultural Resources Utilization Division, Agency for Cultural Affairs) Hikaru Ebesu (Director, the Research Center for the Shikoku Henro and Pilgrimage of the World, Ehime University) Organizers: Organized by: The Shikoku Henro World Heritage Inscription Council Research Center for the Shikoku Henro and Pilgrimage of the World, Ehime University Supported by: Tokushima Prefecture, Kochi Prefecture, Kochi Prefecture Board of Education, Ehime Prefecture, Ehime Prefecture Board of Education, Kagawa Prefecture, and Kagawa Prefecture Board of Education ■ Outline On Saturday, January 25, 2020, the Shikoku Henro World Heritage Inscription Council held an international symposium titled “To Make the Shikoku Henro a World Heritage Site” at Ehime University Nanka Memorial Hall, Matsuyama City, Ehime Prefecture. About 160 people participated in the event. Prior to the symposium, a partnership agreement was signed by the council’s Committee for Evidence of Outstanding Universal Value and the Research Center for the Shikoku Henro and Pilgrimage of the World, Ehime University. -
Multilingual Extractive Reading Comprehension by Runtime Machine Translation
Multilingual Extractive Reading Comprehension by Runtime Machine Translation Akari Asaiy, Akiko Eriguchiy, Kazuma Hashimotoz, and Yoshimasa Tsuruokay yThe University of Tokyo zSalesforce Research [email protected] zferiguchi,[email protected] [email protected] Abstract to English. To alleviate the scarcity of training data in non- Despite recent work in Reading Comprehen- English languages, previous work creates a new sion (RC), progress has been mostly limited to English due to the lack of large-scale datasets large-scale dataset for a language of interest (He in other languages. In this work, we introduce et al., 2017) or combines a medium-scale dataset the first RC system for languages without RC in the language with an existing dataset translated training data. Given a target language without from English (Lee et al., 2018). These efforts in RC training data and a pivot language with RC data creation are often costly, and must be repeated training data (e.g. English), our method lever- for each new language of interest. In addition, they ages existing RC resources in the pivot lan- do not leverage existing resources in English RC, guage by combining a competitive RC model such as the wealth of large-scale datasets and state- in the pivot language with an attentive Neural Machine Translation (NMT) model. We first of-the-art models. translate the data from the target to the pivot In this paper, we propose a multilingual extrac- language, and then obtain an answer using the tive RC method by runtime Machine Translation RC model in the pivot language. -
Leading-Edge Technologies & Sophisticated Techniques Leading
Really The 2015-2016 Guidebook for the Database of Incredible! “SUGOWAZA” Manufacturing Companies in EHIME Database of“SUGOWAZA”Manufacturing Canpanies in EHIME Leading-edgeLeading-edge TechnologiesTechnologies& & SophisticatedSophisticated TechniquesTechniques, A Selection of 163 Companies! inEEHIMEHIME Leading-edge Technologies & Sophisticated Techniques in EEHIMEHIMAE Selection of 163 Companies! No.1 in Japan/ Only One is packed with information! There are many characteristic production companies accumulated in Ehime, varying in their regional history and culture. Information about the technology and products of these companies has been digitized in a database and publicized in this website. Complete with company search functions, and Ehime production industry introductions. Ehime Inquiries Prefecture ●Inquiries about "SUGOWAZA" database and registered companies Leading-edge Technologies & Sophisticated Techniques group, Industry Policy Division⦆Economy and Labor Department, Ehime Prefecture 4-4-2 Ichiban-cho, Matsuyama 790-8570 TEL: 089-912-2473 ⦆ FAX: 089-912-2259 E-mail:[email protected] http://www.sugowaza-ehime.com/ ehime sugowaza Search http://www.sugowaza-ehime.com/ 2015.07 m e s s a g e The industrial structure of Ehime Prefecture is defined by a balance rarely seen anywhere else in Japan, with each prefectural region having its own unique industrial concentrations: secondary industry is abundant in the Toyo Region (eastern area of the prefecture), tertiary industry thrives in the Chuyo Region (the central area of the prefecture around Total Value of Manufa ctured Goods Shipped Matsuyama City), and primary industry is dominant in the Nanyo Region (southwestern area of the prefecture). for Major Cities in Ehi me Prefecture Tokihiro Nakamura, There is a wide array of industrial cities in the Toyo Region, Governor of Ehime Prefecture which are home to numerous manufacturing companies boasting advanced technology unparalleled elsewhere in Japan and producing top-quality products. -
Microsoft 2012 Citizenship Report
Citizenship at Microsoft Our Company Serving Communities Working Responsibly About this Report Microsoft 2012 Citizenship Report Microsoft 2012 Citizenship Report 01 Contents Citizenship at Microsoft Serving Communities Working Responsibly About this Report 3 Serving communities 14 Creating opportunities for youth 46 Our people 85 Reporting year 4 Working responsibly 15 Empowering youth through 47 Compensation and benefits 85 Scope 4 Citizenship governance education and technology 48 Diversity and inclusion 85 Additional reporting 5 Setting priorities and 16 Inspiring young imaginations 50 Training and development 85 Feedback stakeholder engagement 18 Realizing potential with new skills 51 Health and safety 86 United Nations Global Compact 5 External frameworks 20 Supporting youth-focused 53 Environment 6 FY12 highlights and achievements nonprofits 54 Impact of our operations 23 Empowering nonprofits 58 Technology for the environment 24 Donating software to nonprofits Our Company worldwide 61 Human rights 26 Providing hardware to more people 62 Affirming our commitment 28 Sharing knowledge to build capacity 64 Privacy and data security 8 Our business 28 Solutions in action 65 Online safety 8 Where we are 67 Freedom of expression 8 Engaging our customers 31 Employee giving and partners 32 Helping employees make 69 Responsible sourcing 10 Our products a difference 71 Hardware production 11 Investing in innovation 73 Conflict minerals 36 Humanitarian response 74 Expanding our efforts 37 Providing assistance in times of need 76 Governance 40 Accessibility 77 Corporate governance 41 Empowering people with disabilities 79 Maintaining strong practices and performance 42 Engaging students with special needs 80 Public policy engagement 44 Improving seniors’ well-being 83 Compliance Cover: Participants at the 2012 Imagine Cup, Sydney, Australia. -
International Policy Forum 11 March 2014 Approval Ratings- Can You See the Pattern?
International Policy Forum 11 March 2014 Approval Ratings- can you see the pattern? 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute Abe’s approval ratings: better than last time 70 60 50 40 A be 1 A be 2 30 20 10 0 Source: NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute In comparison to past prime ministers 80 70 60 A be 50 N oda Kan 40 H atoyam a 30 Aso Fukuda 20 10 0 Source: NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute Approval rating – LDP and Cabinet 90 Cabinet Approval Rating Ruling Party Approval Rating 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Source: NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute Abe is performing on par with Koizumi this far 90" Koizumi" 80" Abe1" Abe2" 70" 60" 50" 40" 30" 20" 10" 0" Source: NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute But still dependent on New Komeito in the upper house LDP Komeito Your Party DPJ SDP Japan Future Party Daichi 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% LDP Komeito Your Party DPJ SDP Japan Future Party 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Bills for the 186th diet session Ministry of Internal Affairs and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Cabinet Office Communications Industry • Revision of Radio Act to • Bill to extend export credit • Bill to Establish Medical adjust fees for use of radio insurance coverage to trade Strategy Promotion Bureau frequency with overseas subsidiaries • Bill to reform Nuclear • Revision of the Broadcasting • Promotion of city centers - a Damage Liability Act and Radio Act to add new boost for retail? Facilitation Fund (to add Internet broadcasting as a • Introduction of registration system for electricity suppliers ability to fund duty of NHK and to ease decommissioning) (first step towards retail conditions for receiving liberalization) and a system broadcasting license Time: End February • Various measure to promote for trade in electricity futures “e-governance”. -
Newsletter February 2018
Embassy of India, Tokyo NEWSLETTER February 2018 Index Ambassador HE Sujan R Chinoy’s Meetings 3 Seminar on India’s Budget 4 Visit of Parliamentary Delegation from India 4 Visit of Chief Minister of Bihar Shri Nitish Kumar 4 Biannual Reception of Japan India Association 5 Seminars on Economic Opportunities in India 5 Workshop on Arctic Governance 5 Outreach events and Seminar in Kagawa and Ehime Prefectures 5 Meeting with senior management and Indian engineers of Toyo Engineering Corporation 5 Forum 21 Alumni of 2016 batch 6 Visit of Addl DGF(FC) of Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change 6 Interactions by Commerce Wing with Senior Officials of Japanese Companies 6 Japan India High Speed Rail Civil Works and Turnouts Workshop 6 1 Visit to JR-East Staff Training Center and Shinkansen General Rolling Stock Center 7 Interactions with Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd. (DFCCIL) & JICA 7 QCI examination for Yoga 7 Saraswati Puja 7 School Familiarization Visit by Fourth grade students from Taimei Elementary School 7 School visit by Kudan Junior High School 8 Veda and Sanskrit workshop 8 ICCR Scholarship 2018-19 test 8 Luncheon meeting with Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, "Curry Club" 8 Public yoga session in Kitanomaru Park 8 Press Release on the Demise of Padma Bhushan Awardee Mr. Saichiro Misumi 9 Automobile Industry in India 10 Udaipur in Rajasthan – a popular tourist destination in India 12 State Profile: Bihar 23 Trade Fairs & Business Exhibitions in India in February – April 2018 25 Trade Queries from India 27 Photo Gallery 30 “Beauty doesn't need ornaments. -
Microsoft 2006 Citizenship Report
partners in innovation 2006 CITIZENSHIP REPO R T about this report ScOPE CUrrENCY In the 2006 Microsoft Global Citizenship Report, All money figures in this report are in we discuss our key citizenship initiatives and U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. activities worldwide, highlight some of our more significant accomplishments in fiscal year TERMINOLOGY 2006, and share our goals for fiscal year 2007. The terms “Global Citizenship” and “Corporate Citizenship,” which are used throughout REPORTING PERIOD this report, are interchangeable with This report focuses on Microsoft’s fiscal similar terms such as “Corporate Social year 2006 (which began July 1, 2005, Responsibility” and “Corporate Sustainability.” and ended June 30, 2006). All data is for that period unless otherwise noted. GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE (GRI) The function of the GRI performance REPORT STRUCTURE indicators is to make it easier to compare This report is organized to reflect the organizational reports on the basis of economic, structure of our Global Citizenship Initiative environmental, and social impacts. In the and related activities, because we want our online portion of this report, we have included stakeholders — employees, customers, partners, references to applicable GRI indicators to assist shareholders, and others—to be able to stakeholders in their review and assessment compare our program goals and objectives of our Global Citizenship Initiative. with our results. The report is a combination of this print volume, which highlights and More information provides an overview of some key issues, and about the GRI performance indicators is a more detailed online publication that we will available at www.globalreporting.org. update annually. -
Download (PDF 542.27
Can Japanese Nuclear Power Be Restarted Sooner? A Simulation of Alternative Scenarios Saleh Al Muhanna, Imtenan Al-Mubarak, Brian Efird and Faisal Al-Ghamdi October 2019 Doi: 10.30573/KS--2019-DP72 Can Japanese Nuclear Power Be Restarted Sooner? A Simulation of Alternative Scenarios 1 About KAPSARC The King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center (KAPSARC) is a non-profit global institution dedicated to independent research into energy economics, policy, technology and the environment across all types of energy. KAPSARC’s mandate is to advance the understanding of energy challenges and opportunities facing the world today and tomorrow, through unbiased, independent, and high-caliber research for the benefit of society. KAPSARC is located in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This publication is also available in Arabic. Legal Notice © Copyright 2019 King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center (“KAPSARC”). This Document (and any information, data or materials contained therein) (the “Document”) shall not be used without the proper attribution to KAPSARC. The Document shall not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without the written permission of KAPSARC. KAPSARC makes no warranty, representation or undertaking whether expressed or implied, nor does it assume any legal liability, whether direct or indirect, or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information that contain in the Document. Nothing in the Document constitutes or shall be implied to constitute advice, recommendation or option. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views or position of KAPSARC. Can Japanese Nuclear Power Be Restarted Sooner? A Simulation of Alternative Scenarios 2 Key Points his study assesses whether there are politically plausible paths to more quickly gain support for restarting Japanese nuclear power plants and considers alternative scenarios. -
Murphy Why Did the Xbox Fail in Japan?
Travis “L.D.” Murphy Why Did the Xbox Fail in Japan? The sixth console generation was an interesting time in the video game industry. Among other things, it marked the end of the bit wars, the rise of online gaming, and the fall of SEGA from the console market. But in SEGA’s place rose Microsoft with their own Xbox. While the behemoth of a console was unable to shake the PS2’s firm hold on the market, it still managed to edge out Nintendo’s GameCube with over 24 million units sold worldwide. [1] While this victory secured Microsoft’s place as a major player in the console gaming market in the west, the same couldn’t be said for Japan as, despite the company’s efforts, the Xbox barely managed to sell an estimated 450,000 units in the region throughout its lifespan. [2] In fact, on July 18th, 2004 it was reported that even the PlayStation 1, which had been out for almost a decade by that point, outsold the Xbox in Japan too. [3] It’s important to note that Microsoft faced an uphill battle from the very beginning. After all, Japanese companies had a very firm hold on the video game console market ever since the aftermath of the video game crash of 1983. Furthermore, Japan alone represented nearly a third of the market. [4]So, from the early days developing the system, the Xbox team kept Japan close in mind. Then Xbox Director of Third Party Relations, Kevin Bachus, recalled, “We were basically going to play in Sony, Sega and Nintendo's home stadium. -
Security Intelligence Report
Managing Risks Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report Volume 9 January through June 2010 Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report Microsoft Security Intelligence Report This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT. This document is provided “as-is”. Information and views expressed in this document, including URL and other Internet website references, may change without notice. You bear the risk of using it. Copyright © 2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. 2 January through June 2010 Authors David Anselmi Jimmy Kuo Navaneethan Santhanam Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Malware Protection Center Bing Richard Boscovich Scott Molenkamp Christian Seifert Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Malware Protection Center Bing T.J. Campana Michelle Meyer Frank Simorjay Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Neil Carpenter Bala Neerumalla Holly Stewart CSS Security Microsoft Secure SQL Initiative Team Microsoft Malware Protection Center Greg Cottingham Daryl Pecelj Adrian Stone CSS Security Microsoft IT Information Security and Risk Management Microsoft Security Response Center Joe Faulhaber Anthony Penta Matt Thomlinson Microsoft Malware Protection Center Microsoft Windows Safety Platform Microsoft Security Response Center Vinny Gullotto Paul Pottorff Jossie Tirado Arroyo Microsoft Malware -
Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report
Battling Botnets for Control of Computers Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report Volume 9 January through June 2010 Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report Microsoft Security Intelligence Report This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMA- TION IN THIS DOCUMENT. This document is provided “as-is.” Information and views expressed in this document, including URL and other Internet Web site references, may change without notice. You bear the risk of using it. Copyright © 2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. 2 January through June 2010 Authors David Anselmi Jimmy Kuo Navaneethan Santhanam Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Malware Protection Center Bing Richard Boscovich Scott Molenkamp Christian Seifert Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Malware Protection Center Bing T.J. Campana Michelle Meyer Frank Simorjay Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Neil Carpenter Bala Neerumalla Holly Stewart CSS Security Microsoft Secure SQL Initiative Team Microsoft Malware Protection Center Greg Cottingham Daryl Pecelj Adrian Stone CSS Security Microsoft IT Information Security and Risk Management Microsoft Security Response Center Joe Faulhaber Anthony Penta Matt Thomlinson Microsoft Malware Protection Center Microsoft Windows Safety Platform Microsoft Security Response Center Vinny Gullotto Paul Pottorff Jossie