DOCSLIB.ORG

Security Intelligence Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Security Intelligence Report Managing Risks Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report Volume 9 January through June 2010 Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report Microsoft Security Intelligence Report This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT. This document is provided “as-is”. Information and views expressed in this document, including URL and other Internet website references, may change without notice. You bear the risk of using it. Copyright © 2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. 2 January through June 2010 Authors David Anselmi Jimmy Kuo Navaneethan Santhanam Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Malware Protection Center Bing Richard Boscovich Scott Molenkamp Christian Seifert Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Malware Protection Center Bing T.J. Campana Michelle Meyer Frank Simorjay Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Neil Carpenter Bala Neerumalla Holly Stewart CSS Security Microsoft Secure SQL Initiative Team Microsoft Malware Protection Center Greg Cottingham Daryl Pecelj Adrian Stone CSS Security Microsoft IT Information Security and Risk Management Microsoft Security Response Center Joe Faulhaber Anthony Penta Matt Thomlinson Microsoft Malware Protection Center Microsoft Windows Safety Platform Microsoft Security Response Center Vinny Gullotto Paul Pottorff Jossie Tirado Arroyo Microsoft Malware Protection Center Windows Consumer Product Management Microsoft IT Information Security and Risk Paul Henry Tim Rains Management Wadeware LLC Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Scott Wu Jeannette Jarvis Javier Salido Microsoft Malware Protection Center CSS Security Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Terry Zink Jeff Jones Microsoft Forefront Online Protection for Exchange Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Contributors Ian Brackenbury John Lambert Andrei Florin Saygo Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Microsoft Security Engineering Center Microsoft Malware Protection Center Doug Cavit Laura Lemire Jireh Sanico Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Microsoft Malware Protection Center Eva Chow Nishanth Lingamneni Richard Saunders (EMEA) Microsoft IT Information Security and Risk Microsoft Security Essentials Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Management Ken Malcolmson Marc Seinfeld Greg Cottingham Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Microsoft Malware Protection Center CSS Security Russ McRee Jasmine Sesso Dave Dittrich Global Foundation Services Microsoft Malware Protection Center University of Washington Charles McColgan Norie Tamura (GOMI) Enrique Gonzalez Microsoft ISD CSS Japan Security Response Team Microsoft Malware Protection Center Mark Miller Gilou Tenebro Cristin Goodwin Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Microsoft Malware Protection Center Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Price Oden Patrik Vicol Satomi Hayakawa Microsoft IT Information Security and Risk Management Microsoft Malware Protection Center CSS Japan Security Response Team Kathy Phillips Steve Wacker Robert Hensing Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs Wadeware LLC Microsoft Consulting Services Anthony Potestivo Jeff Williams Yuhui Huang Microsoft IT Information Security and Risk Management Microsoft Malware Protection Center Microsoft Malware Protection Center Ina Ragragio Dan Wolff CSS Japan Security Response Team Microsoft Malware Protection Center Microsoft Malware Protection Center Microsoft Japan Tareq Saade Joe Johnson Microsoft Malware Protection Center Microsoft Malware Protection Center 3 Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report Table of Contents Authors & Contributors 3 Making Microsoft More Secure 5 Information Security Policies 5 Business Drivers for Information Security Policies 6 Policy Management 6 Promoting Awareness 7 Security Awareness Program 7 Defending Against Malware 8 Secure Infrastructure 9 Protect Your Computer 10 Other Resources 11 Malware Response Case Study 12 Isolate the Computer 12 Identify the Malware 12 Determine How the Malware Starts 13 How Was the Malware Installed? 14 Determine Malware Connectivity 15 Remediate the Malware 16 Recommendations 16 This section features information and tips from two groups at Microsoft that have practical, real-world experience managing malware outbreaks and safeguarding networks, systems, and people: Microsoft® IT (MSIT), which manages the enterprise computing infrastructure at Microsoft, and Microsoft Customer Service and Support (CSS), which provides support information and services to Microsoft customers worldwide. The informa- tion presented here describes how these two groups have met the challenges Pposed by malware and security threats in their areas of responsibility. Not all of the details are likely to be relevant to security–related scenarios elsewhere, but Microsoft hopes that this information will give readers useful ideas for improving their own incident prevention and response plans. For comprehensive security guidance related to the aspects of security covered in this report, see the Managing Risk section of the Security Intelligence Report website. 4 January through June 2010 Making Microsoft More Secure Microsoft IT (MSIT) Microsoft IT (MSIT) provides information technology services internally for Microsoft employees and resources. MSIT manages 900,000 devices for 180,000 end users across more than 100 countries worldwide, with approximately 2 million remote connections per month. Safeguarding a computing infrastructure of this size requires implementation of strong security policies, tech- nology to help keep malware off the network and away from mission-critical resources, and dealing with malware outbreaks swiftly and comprehensively when they occur. The Security Intelligence Report typically focuses primarily on the technological aspects of malware and security, supported by in-depth telemetry data from multiple products and services. However, for IT departments looking to secure their networks, the non- technical aspects of security—policies, planning, education, awareness, and others—can be just as important. MSIT has had considerable experience on both sides of the equation, and we hope that information about the policies we’ve implemented can benefit others. The IT Showcase section of the Microsoft TechNet Library (technet.microsoft.com) includes a variety of articles and papers from MSIT about all aspects of IT administration. In this section we present a small sample of the IT Showcase material we have published on the subject of security. See technet.microsoft.com/library/bb687780.aspx for the full Microsoft IT Showcase collection, and see technet.microsoft.com/library/bb687795.aspx for the full versions of these and other security–related articles. Information Security Policies Excerpt from “Information Security at Microsoft Overview” (technet.microsoft.com/library/ bb671086.aspx), updated November 2007 Microsoft uses a layered approach to information security policies. This approach evolved out of business needs that remain fueled by an appreciation of the value of information assets, an evolving threat landscape with intentional and unintentional breaches and loss of information, and technology advancements enacted within and outside the company. The information security policies at Microsoft include: Microsoft Information Security Program (MISP) Policy. This policy establishes accountabilities that require Microsoft to operate a security program. It also estab- lishes a framework for a risk–based and policy–based approach to protecting assets. Information Security Policy. This policy contains principles for protecting and properly using corporate resources. It supports specific security standards, operating procedures, and guidelines for business units. Information Security Standards. This policy provides requirements and prescriptive guidance that enable users to comply with the Information Security Policy. 5 Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report Business Drivers for Information Security Policies Information security policies demonstrate company values and drive desired behaviors. They help ensure regulatory compliance and alignment with industry standards, and they are useful for conducting internal audits. Audits help ensure that company procedures support policies and that employees are following the procedures; they also help measure the overall security health of the organization. Without policies to govern the corporate infrastructure, the potential for loss of intellectual property, personally identifiable infor- mation (PII), and customer data increases dramatically. Figure 1 illustrates how Microsoft manages risk by using security policies that drive behavior, support values, and limit exceptions. FiguRe 1 How Microsoft uses information security policies Audit processes against Loss of iP, Pii & Customer Data Comply with regulations Risk Demonstrate Business company Drivers values Risk Align with industry standards exceptions Drive desired behaviors Policy Management Microsoft IT must enforce all of its unique security policies consistently to maintain cred- ibility. Involving key executives during the authorization process lends influence and credence. Implementing a repeatable process ensures that the appropriate roles, responsi- bilities, and administrative controls are in place. Promoting Awareness: If users are not aware of policies and standards, they cannot be held accountable for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 「Citizenship Report 2014
    Citizenship Report 2014 - 2015 Creating a real impact for a better tomorrow, with the power of ICT and the mind of citizenship The future is ahead of us and Japan is moving toward it with strong footsteps. With Tokyo being selected to host the Olympics in 2020, the Japanese society sees the lights breaking through the clouds, starting to illuminate the future. Japan is still facing a number of pressing challenges, such as the trend toward becoming a highly aged society, a shrinking working age population, declining job opportunities, and contracting regional economies. In addressing these social issues, information and communications technology or ICT, has an indispensable role to play, as specifically noted in the Japanese government’s “Declaration to be the World’s Most Advanced IT Nation”. As a leading company of ICT, Microsoft Japan is contributing to finding solutions to these challenges and driving new societal movements especially in the areas of “cloud” and “mobile” technologies. Microsoft’s new mission is to “empower all individuals and organizations on the planet to achieve more.” By connecting ICT with people, ICT with Japan, and ICT with the future, we are determined to serve various communities. We believe this is the natural role of Microsoft Japan—a company that has taken root in Japan and has been growing together with Japanese society. 2 Citizenship Report 2014-2015 Contents 4 Leadership Dialogue What actions are local governments and businesses expected to take to enhance the vibrancy of local communities? —Toward progress in the “regional vitalization” initiative 8 Local Revitalization 10 Work Style New Directions 13 Small Businesses and Startups 14 Education Becoming a “productivity and platform” company 18 Information Security In February 2014, Satya Nadella was appointed as the 20 Contribution to Local Society third CEO of Microsoft Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Multilingual Extractive Reading Comprehension by Runtime Machine Translation
    Multilingual Extractive Reading Comprehension by Runtime Machine Translation Akari Asaiy, Akiko Eriguchiy, Kazuma Hashimotoz, and Yoshimasa Tsuruokay yThe University of Tokyo zSalesforce Research [email protected] zferiguchi,[email protected] [email protected] Abstract to English. To alleviate the scarcity of training data in non- Despite recent work in Reading Comprehen- English languages, previous work creates a new sion (RC), progress has been mostly limited to English due to the lack of large-scale datasets large-scale dataset for a language of interest (He in other languages. In this work, we introduce et al., 2017) or combines a medium-scale dataset the first RC system for languages without RC in the language with an existing dataset translated training data. Given a target language without from English (Lee et al., 2018). These efforts in RC training data and a pivot language with RC data creation are often costly, and must be repeated training data (e.g. English), our method lever- for each new language of interest. In addition, they ages existing RC resources in the pivot lan- do not leverage existing resources in English RC, guage by combining a competitive RC model such as the wealth of large-scale datasets and state- in the pivot language with an attentive Neural Machine Translation (NMT) model. We first of-the-art models. translate the data from the target to the pivot In this paper, we propose a multilingual extrac- language, and then obtain an answer using the tive RC method by runtime Machine Translation RC model in the pivot language.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft 2012 Citizenship Report
    Citizenship at Microsoft Our Company Serving Communities Working Responsibly About this Report Microsoft 2012 Citizenship Report Microsoft 2012 Citizenship Report 01 Contents Citizenship at Microsoft Serving Communities Working Responsibly About this Report 3 Serving communities 14 Creating opportunities for youth 46 Our people 85 Reporting year 4 Working responsibly 15 Empowering youth through 47 Compensation and benefits 85 Scope 4 Citizenship governance education and technology 48 Diversity and inclusion 85 Additional reporting 5 Setting priorities and 16 Inspiring young imaginations 50 Training and development 85 Feedback stakeholder engagement 18 Realizing potential with new skills 51 Health and safety 86 United Nations Global Compact 5 External frameworks 20 Supporting youth-focused 53 Environment 6 FY12 highlights and achievements nonprofits 54 Impact of our operations 23 Empowering nonprofits 58 Technology for the environment 24 Donating software to nonprofits Our Company worldwide 61 Human rights 26 Providing hardware to more people 62 Affirming our commitment 28 Sharing knowledge to build capacity 64 Privacy and data security 8 Our business 28 Solutions in action 65 Online safety 8 Where we are 67 Freedom of expression 8 Engaging our customers 31 Employee giving and partners 32 Helping employees make 69 Responsible sourcing 10 Our products a difference 71 Hardware production 11 Investing in innovation 73 Conflict minerals 36 Humanitarian response 74 Expanding our efforts 37 Providing assistance in times of need 76 Governance 40 Accessibility 77 Corporate governance 41 Empowering people with disabilities 79 Maintaining strong practices and performance 42 Engaging students with special needs 80 Public policy engagement 44 Improving seniors’ well-being 83 Compliance Cover: Participants at the 2012 Imagine Cup, Sydney, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft 2006 Citizenship Report
    partners in innovation 2006 CITIZENSHIP REPO R T about this report ScOPE CUrrENCY In the 2006 Microsoft Global Citizenship Report, All money figures in this report are in we discuss our key citizenship initiatives and U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. activities worldwide, highlight some of our more significant accomplishments in fiscal year TERMINOLOGY 2006, and share our goals for fiscal year 2007. The terms “Global Citizenship” and “Corporate Citizenship,” which are used throughout REPORTING PERIOD this report, are interchangeable with This report focuses on Microsoft’s fiscal similar terms such as “Corporate Social year 2006 (which began July 1, 2005, Responsibility” and “Corporate Sustainability.” and ended June 30, 2006). All data is for that period unless otherwise noted. GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE (GRI) The function of the GRI performance REPORT STRUCTURE indicators is to make it easier to compare This report is organized to reflect the organizational reports on the basis of economic, structure of our Global Citizenship Initiative environmental, and social impacts. In the and related activities, because we want our online portion of this report, we have included stakeholders — employees, customers, partners, references to applicable GRI indicators to assist shareholders, and others—to be able to stakeholders in their review and assessment compare our program goals and objectives of our Global Citizenship Initiative. with our results. The report is a combination of this print volume, which highlights and More information provides an overview of some key issues, and about the GRI performance indicators is a more detailed online publication that we will available at www.globalreporting.org. update annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Murphy Why Did the Xbox Fail in Japan?
    Travis “L.D.” Murphy Why Did the Xbox Fail in Japan? The sixth console generation was an interesting time in the video game industry. Among other things, it marked the end of the bit wars, the rise of online gaming, and the fall of SEGA from the console market. But in SEGA’s place rose Microsoft with their own Xbox. While the behemoth of a console was unable to shake the PS2’s firm hold on the market, it still managed to edge out Nintendo’s GameCube with over 24 million units sold worldwide. [1] While this victory secured Microsoft’s place as a major player in the console gaming market in the west, the same couldn’t be said for Japan as, despite the company’s efforts, the Xbox barely managed to sell an estimated 450,000 units in the region throughout its lifespan. [2] In fact, on July 18th, 2004 it was reported that even the PlayStation 1, which had been out for almost a decade by that point, outsold the Xbox in Japan too. [3] It’s important to note that Microsoft faced an uphill battle from the very beginning. After all, Japanese companies had a very firm hold on the video game console market ever since the aftermath of the video game crash of 1983. Furthermore, Japan alone represented nearly a third of the market. [4]So, from the early days developing the system, the Xbox team kept Japan close in mind. Then Xbox Director of Third Party Relations, Kevin Bachus, recalled, “We were basically going to play in Sony, Sega and Nintendo's home stadium.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report
    Battling Botnets for Control of Computers Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report Volume 9 January through June 2010 Microsoft | Security Intelligence Report Microsoft Security Intelligence Report This document is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMA- TION IN THIS DOCUMENT. This document is provided “as-is.” Information and views expressed in this document, including URL and other Internet Web site references, may change without notice. You bear the risk of using it. Copyright © 2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. 2 January through June 2010 Authors David Anselmi Jimmy Kuo Navaneethan Santhanam Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Malware Protection Center Bing Richard Boscovich Scott Molenkamp Christian Seifert Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Malware Protection Center Bing T.J. Campana Michelle Meyer Frank Simorjay Digital Crimes Unit Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Neil Carpenter Bala Neerumalla Holly Stewart CSS Security Microsoft Secure SQL Initiative Team Microsoft Malware Protection Center Greg Cottingham Daryl Pecelj Adrian Stone CSS Security Microsoft IT Information Security and Risk Management Microsoft Security Response Center Joe Faulhaber Anthony Penta Matt Thomlinson Microsoft Malware Protection Center Microsoft Windows Safety Platform Microsoft Security Response Center Vinny Gullotto Paul Pottorff Jossie
    [Show full text]
  • A Rewards System to Distinguish Trustworthy Articles
    A Rewards System to Distinguish Trustworthy Articles ALIS is Japan's First Social Media Platform Using Blockchain Technology Masahiro Yasu, Sota Ishii, Takashi Mizusawa Version 1.06: September 6, 2017 © ALIS Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. Contents 1. What is ALIS 2 2. Target market size and the appeal of the Japanese market 4 3. Platform growth strategy in Japan 5 4. Platform introduction and its features 8 5. Screen image introduction 9 6. Why it attracts high quality articles 10 7. Why it can pass on value to people 11 8. Why ALIS can continue to grow for the long term 12 9. How token is created and distributed 12 10. About the detail of distribution logic and adjustment of parameters 13 11. How fraud is prevented 15 12. The blockchain technology used in ALIS 16 13. The vision and mission of the team and profiles of team members 17 14. Financing 19 15. How the money will be used 21 16. The company operation policy 22 17. The details of ICO 23 18. Conclusion 24 1 1. What is ALIS ALIS is Japan's first non-ad funded social media platform. It is a new and novel platform where many individuals can create and find useful articles. With ALIS tokens as the key driver, we remove ads and stealth marketing so that people can quickly access and find high quality articles and trusted individuals. To be honest, we were intrigued by STEEM (https://steem.io), which helped to inspire the conception of ALIS. This article explains the STEEM concept: https://cointelegraph.com/news/steemit-new-social-media-platform-which-pays-you-to-post Our story began with Sota Ishii, our project member who posted several travel photos (https://steemit.com/japanese/@sot528/1-south-america-tour-no-1) on STEEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Four-Day Workweek: the Microsoft Japan Experience
    VC20032 Four-Day Workweek: The Microsoft Japan Experience Courtney Gatlin-Keener, MBA University of the Incarnate Word Ryan Lunsford, PhD University of the Incarnate Word ABSTRACT This case study presents an in-depth analysis of the four-day workweek experiment conducted at Microsoft Japan in August 2019 as part of its Work Life Choice Challenge (WLCC) summer activity. It also evaluates various perspectives surrounding the advantages and limitations of the four-day workweek as applied in the context of Microsoft Japan’s operations. Furthermore, the complexities and uniqueness of the four-day workweek are discussed in the light of the theoretical and practical implications from the literature regarding the adjustment of time management policy and introduction of technology-assisted strategies to optimize work hours. The four-day workweek is seen to be of special significance to the Japanese work culture because of the increasing number of karoshi -related deaths (Takami, 2017). Thus, the case study also expounds on the dilemma of the famed Japanese practice of hard work (Ballon, 2018). In addition, an exploration of best practices, a reflection of lessons learned, and the identification of practical recommendations discovered from the study of Microsoft Japan’s four-day workweek experience are summarized. Keywords: four-day workweek, overwork death, karoshi, overwork suicide, karojisatsu, Japanese work culture, Microsoft Japan, Work Life Choice Challenge, WLCC Four-day workweek, Page 1 VC20032 INTRODUCTION The twenty-first century continues to be a defining period of change and disruption that continues to result in a more virtually and seemingly smaller world (Gilligan, Leontaris, & Lopez, 2019). Along with the influx of innovative technologies, globalization is revolutionizing every social, business, and household process via the pathways of digital connectivity and the imperatives of trade and commerce (Ghemawat, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Nintendo Co., Ltd
    Nintendo Co., Ltd. Earnings Release for the Nine-Month Period Ended December 2019 Supplementary Information [Note] Forecasts announced by Nintendo Co., Ltd. herein are prepared based on management's assumptions with information available at this time and therefore involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Please note such risks and uncertainties may cause the actual results to be materially different from the forecasts (earnings forecast, dividend forecast and other forecasts). Nintendo Co., Ltd. Consolidated Statements of Income Transition million yen FY3/2016 FY3/2017 FY3/2018 FY3/2019 FY3/2020 Apr.-Dec.'15 Apr.-Dec.'16 Apr.-Dec.'17 Apr.-Dec.'18 Apr.-Dec.'19 Net sales 425,664 311,121 857,012 997,295 1,022,668 Cost of sales 242,364 171,055 530,707 588,222 556,578 Gross profit 183,299 140,065 326,305 409,073 466,089 (Gross profit ratio) (43.1%) (45.0%) (38.1%) (41.0%) (45.6%) Selling, general and 140,814 113,750 169,842 189,043 203,159 administrative expenses Operating profit 42,485 26,315 156,462 220,029 262,930 (Operating profit ratio) (10.0%) (8.5%) (18.3%) (22.1%) (25.7%) Non-operating income 12,993 23,837 38,874 20,469 19,826 (of which foreign exchange gains) (1,801) (1,405) (20,264) (4,349) ( - ) Non-operating expenses 183 1,043 772 230 8,915 (of which foreign exchange losses) ( - ) ( - ) ( - ) ( - ) (8,099) Ordinary profit 55,295 49,110 194,563 240,268 273,841 (Ordinary profit ratio) (13.0%) (15.8%) (22.7%) (24.1%) (26.8%) Extraordinary income 404 63,756 3,240 1 988 Extraordinary losses 940 193 1,428 703 103 Profit before income taxes 54,759 112,673 196,375 239,566 274,725 Income taxes 14,196 9,693 59,253 70,384 78,308 Profit 40,563 102,979 137,122 169,182 196,417 Profit attributable to 4 10 1,957 396 27 non-controlling interests Profit attributable to 40,558 102,969 135,165 168,785 196,389 owners of parent (Profit attributable to (9.5%) (33.1%) (15.8%) (16.9%) (19.2%) owners of parent ratio) -1- Nintendo Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Video Games Cluster in Japan
    Microeconomics of Competitiveness Professor: Michael E. Porter Advisor: Niels Ketelhöhn The Video Games Cluster in Japan Tetsuya Azuma (HKS) 2009/05/08 Marton Sziraczki (HBS) Nobutaka Takeo (HKS) Satoshi Yamada (MIT Sloan) Table of Contents 1. Country Analysis ...........................................................................................................1 1.1 Brief overview of Japan ............................................................................................1 1.2 The Diamond Analysis of Japan .............................................................................7 2. Cluster Analysis ..............................................................................................................13 2.1 Brief overview ..............................................................................................................13 2.2 The Diamond Analysis ................................................................................................16 3. Recommendations and threats ....................................................................................25 4. Bibliography .....................................................................................................................30 1 1. Country Analysis 1.1 Brief overview of Japan Overall picture of Japan : Fig. 1 Overall picture of Japan Japan has a population of 128 million (10th in the world) with among the highest level of literacy in the developed world (Figure 1), dating back to the “Terakoya-system1” in the Edo-Era, Japan had an excellent
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents President’s Message .......................................................................................................................................5 JCIE Activities: April 2006–March 2008 .....................................................................................................8 Global ThinkNet Policy Research and Dialogue ................................................................................................................. 12 Asia Pacific Agenda Project The Development of Trilateral Cooperation among East Asia, North America, and Europe in Global Governance East Asia and a Rising India: Prospects for the Region 12th APAP Forum, Bali 13th APAP Forum, Singapore Dialogue and Research Monitor: Toward Community Building in East Asia ASEM’s Role in Enhancing Asia-Europe Cooperation: Ten Years of Achievements and Future Challenges East Asia Insights: Toward Community Building An Enhanced Agenda for US-Japan Partnership Human Security Approaches to HIV/AIDS in Asia and Africa Managing China-Japan-US Relations and Strengthening Trilateral Cooperation Survey of the State of US-China Policy-Oriented Intellectual Exchange and Dialogue Survey of US Congressional Approaches to East Asia After the Midterm Elections Preliminary Study on Community Perspectives on Human Security Survey of Trends in US-Japan Exchange Support and Cooperation for Research and Dialogue .......................................................................20 Trilateral Commission UK-Japan 21st Century Group Japanese-German Forum
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal and Evaluation of Kinect-Based Physical Training System for Special Needs Education
    ACHI 2018 : The Eleventh International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions Proposal and Evaluation of Kinect-based Physical Training System for Special Needs Education Hiroki Matsuda, Hidemi Yamachi, Fumihiro Kumeno Kotomi Shiota Department of Computer and Information Technology Organization for University Research Initiatives Nippon Institute of Technology Waseda Universityline Japan, Miyashiro Japan, Totsukamachi email: [email protected], [email protected], email: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract- Microsoft Kinect is a motion sensing device for of disability inventory scores before and after training [5] and video games with potential applications in rehabilitation or found significantly improved results. physical training systems. Many studies have shown the effectiveness of Kinect-based physical training systems, Few studies have specifically studied the use of such tools particularly for promoting concentration and movement in in the special needs education fields. Chang et al. compared the special needs education. However, the availability of such systems effectiveness of the Kinect system and the high fidelity in the special needs education field in Japan is currently very OptiTrack optical system [6] and showed that Kinect was limited. We developed a Kinect-based physical training system effective enough as a rehabilitation tool for use in both clinical for special needs education and provided it to schools for and home environments. Altanis et al. also found that a Kinect evaluation. To clearly estimate the system efficacy, we developed learning game was effective for children with gross motor skill a motion analyzer utilizing the open-source software OpenPose. problems and motor impairments [7]. Boutiska et al.
    [Show full text]