W O R L D H E a I ORGANIZATIO EXECUTIVE BOARD Forty-First

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

W O R L D H E a I ORGANIZATIO EXECUTIVE BOARD Forty-First о A N I s A T 1 0 A WORLD H E A I lQ D E L M 0 N D I A ri ORGANIZATIO SANTÉ INDEXED EXECUTIVE BOARD EB41/WP/2 23 January 1968 Forty-first Session (JimiJNAL ENGLISH Agenda item 3.2 办抑 uàt WHO RESEARCH PROGRAMME The following information is submitted to the Executive Board at the request of its Standing Committee on Administration and Finance. WHO activities in the field of medical research stem ti."川 Article 2 (n ) oí 1 ho Constitution, which established that one of the functions of WHO is "lo promoto and conciin.t research in the field of health11. The guiding principles for the promotion and conduct of research were established by the Second World Health Assembly, under resolution WHA2.19, Further elaboration of the principles and the objectives of WHO research actл vi ties are to be found in the relevant consecutive resolutions of tho Execut ive Board and t.ho World Ileal th Assembly. In view of the above, WHO has been promoting and conducting research as part of its regular programme of activities, as included in the periodic programmos oÍ' work for sp<M: i f ic periods (EB13.R78 and WHA7.52). The Intensified Programme In 1958 the World Health Assembly adopted a resolution (WHA丄1.35) requesting the Director-General to arrange for a special study of the role of WHO in research. In his report to the Twelfth World Health Assembly, the Director-General proposed a plan for an intensified programme of medical research based, on the above study. In its resolution WHA12.17, the World Health Assembly approved the proposed plan for the initial year 1960 and established an Advisory Committee on Medical research to provide the Director-General with the necessary scientific advice in relation to the research programme. Objectives of the WHO Intensified Programme of Medical Research The objectives of the programme as formulated by the advisory experts and adopted by the World Health Assembly are four-fold, namely: 12 The support of medical research 3 The provision of services for research 4 The training of research workers The improvement of communication between scientific workers 1• The support of medical research rests on three activities, namely : the Collaborative Research", the "Field Research Teams" and the "Grants to Individual Investigators". Collaborative research, which constitutes by far the largest single item in the WHO research programme, is based on the premise that some problems are better resolved by the co-operative efforts of workers in various countries, and under different ecologic condi- tions, The research projects are WHO-initiated, but they are contracted out to established institutions. The total number of such contracts active in 1967 was 608, out of which 172 were awarded for projects initiated in that year. (See Annex I.) The second activity under this heading is the conduct of research on special subjects of wide interest which could not be solved by the collaborative approach described above. They are, in essence, inter-regional activities - closely related to the WHO programme activities - and are conducted by WHO staff members• Ten such teams were in operation in 1967, 12 will be in operation in 1968 and 13 are envisaged for 1969. Grants to individual investigators are awarded to a number of scientists working on subjects of interest to WHO. Unlike the previous categories these are not WHO-initiated projects, but proposals from individual scientists. Although WHO is not primarily a granting institution, it was felt that this mechanism would promote research and encourage scientists who have no access to major funding organizations and would supply incentives to WHO research trainees. (See Annex II.) In relation to the other two activities mentioned above, this is of much lesser magnitude. 2. The provision of services for research. WHO facilitates the research efforts of the scientific community by providing certain services such as the reference centres and the reports of scientific groups, A reference centre is a national institution selected by WHO to perform certain activities of international value, such as standardization of techniques or reagents; the maintenance of reference strains of bacteria; the provision of special strains of laboratory animals; the standardization of nomenclature, etc. The WHO network of reference centres includes inter- national and. regional centres. These, in turn, are connected to a large number of national or collaborating centres. By the end of 1967, there were 83 International Reference Centres, connected with 61 regional and 282 collaborating centres or laboratories• (See Annex III.) A scientific group is an ad hoc group comprising a number of experts in a particular field. These groups are convened by the Director-General in order to review specific subjects from a purely scientific point of view, to identify gaps in knowledge, and to advise him on needs for further research. Although the reports of the scientific groups are restricted documents, some of them are found to be of general interest and are therefore published in the Technical Report Series• These publications are highly appreciated by the scientific community and are increasingly used as teaching material and as guidelines for the development of research programmes• During 1967, 14 scientific groups were held; 10 are foreseen for 1968 and 11 are proposed for 1969. 3. The training of research workers. One of the most effective measures for the promotion of research and the increase of the research potential of countries is to increase the number of persons qualified in research methodology. In order to attain this goal, WHO developed a programme designed to train research workers. This is in accordance with the Director- General 1 s report (Annex V, Official Records No. 95) approved by WHA12.17 and resolutions WHA13�64 and WHA15.52. The total number of trainees for the period 1961 to 1967 was 204. (See Annex IV.) 4. The improvement of communication between scientists. The WHO programme for the exchange of research workers is an important contribution to the promotion of scientist-to- scientist communication. Under this programme, a scientist from one country is enabled to visit scientists in other countries for periods of up to three months, thus facilitating personal contact and exchange of ideas. The total number of grants awarded for the period 1961 to 1967 was 232. (See Annex V.) Besides the above, WHO promotes a number of meetings, symposia and seminars which bring scientists together from various parts of the world. Information on research institutions, scientists and research projects is being gathered at WHO headquarters by the Biomedical Research Information Service. This Service, established in 1965, has already gathered a large quantity of information on cancer research, and is now l)agu 3 in the process of gathering information on other research fields. The information is made available to scientists and research institutions upon request. The above activities are in accordance with EB8.R34 confirmed hy WHA7.52. The Advisory Committee on Medical Research In accordance with WHA12.17, an advisory group was established under the name of Advisory Committee on Medical Research (ACMR). The group meets once a year, reviews the WHO research programme and advises the Director-General on research policy, priorities, as well as on the need for additional research in certain fields. The ACMR is composed of 18 members and a chairman. Members are normally appointed for periods of four years, and the chairman for periods of five years. The names of past nnd f)rosont members and chairmen are given in Annexes VI (a) and VI (b). Mechanisms and procedures for the selection of research subjects, institutions and grantees. In determining research priorities, the Director-General relies on the knowledge and experience of staff members, on report s from the fin Lei, on t ho recommendations of scientific groups and expert committees, and on the priorities as established by the Advisory Committee on Medical Research. The subjects selected by the Director-General are included in his programme and budget proposals for the consideration of the Executive Board and World Health Assembly. The technical units formulate specific proposals wi thin the approved programme and budget. The proposals include all elements, namely, the methodology of research, the names of the institution and the principal investigator, the probable duration of the contract and the annual WHO contributions. In formulating proposals, the technical units are assisted by consultants if necessary, and by the advice of scientific groups. In selecting the proposed institutions, the technical units are guided by advice from members of scientific groups, members of expert panels, visits to the institutions and consultation with the regional offices. The unit proposals are then studied by the unit of Research Co-ordination, which makes its recommendations to the Director-General. On approval by the Director-General, consultations are undertaken with the institution concerned and, when applicable, with the host government• The agreement is finally embodied in a research contract which sets terms and conditions, (Form No. 363.) The amounts awarded under these contracts are relatively small and cover only a part of the additional expenditure of the institution concerned, making the research project a true collaboration between WHO and the research institution. In the case of research grants (training grants, exchange of research workers, and grants to individual investigators), the initiative comes from the interested party whp applies to WHO on a special application form (form No. 336). The applicant is guided by explanatory booklets which set out the terms, conditions and procedures for application. The applications are processed and prepared for review by the unit of Fellowships and Training Grants, in the case of training and exchange applications, and by the unit of Research Co-ordination in the case of grants to individual investigators.
Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Marcel Roche (1920-2003)
    Interciencia ISSN: 0378-1844 [email protected] Asociación Interciencia Venezuela Laufer, Miguel Marcel Roche (1920-2003) Interciencia, vol. 28, núm. 5, mayo, 2003, pp. 249-251 Asociación Interciencia Caracas, Venezuela Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33908001 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto EDITORIAL MARCEL ROCHE (1920-2003) Marcel Roche, inspirador, promotor y Director Funda- Quienes tuvimos el enorme privilegio de conocerlo, de dor de Interciencia falleció a los 82 años de edad. Fue compartir y trabajar con él, y aprender de Marcel, como una de las más relevantes personalidades del mundo de la se hiciera llamar los últimos 20 años de su vida el hom- ciencia en su país, Venezuela, y en toda Latinoamérica. bre que antes fue siempre el ‘Dr. Roche’, lo tendremos Roche es reconocido y será recordado como uno entre presente en la memoria como el amigo extraordinariamen- los más importantes hombres de ciencia venezolanos del te culto, sencillo, bondadoso y alegre que fue en vida. siglo XX por sus contribuciones fundamentales al estudio Como aquel que siempre ayudó a los jóvenes científicos, del bocio endémico y su erradicación, al conocimiento de y los dejó crecer. la etiopatogenia de la necatoriasis, y a la consolidación del Además de una sólida educación en Francia y estudios campo de la historia y sociología de la ciencia.
    [Show full text]
  • Informed Consent and the 1968 Neel Expedition (Primary Research Responsibility: Trudy Turner ([email protected])
    Informed consent and the 1968 Neel expedition (Primary Research Responsibility: Trudy Turner ([email protected]). Supplementary editorial responsibility: Jane H. Hill, Ray Hames, Joe Watkins) The Peacock Report raised the question of informed consent in connection with Tierney’s allegations regarding Marcel Roche’s experiments with radioactive iodine among the Yanomami beginning in 1958. The Task Force awaits material from Venezuela regarding these experiments. However, the question also arises in connection with Neel’s expedition, since Neel collected biological materials among the Yanomami that remain under study. Thus it is important to evaluate whether or not these materials were collected with appropriate attention to informed consent. In discussions of the informed consent procedures that were used during Neel’s 1968 expedition, it is important to recognize both the codes that were in force governing consent during that time and also to understand the way in which consent was actually obtained by researchers working with similar populations during that time period. Important codes regarding informed consent in 1968 There are several excellent reviews of the history of informed consent by ethicists, philosophers, attorneys and historians of science (Beecher, 1970; Tranoy, 1983; Engelhardt, 1986; Faden and Beauchamp, 1986; Beauchamp and Childress, 1989; Gert, Culver and Clouser, 1997; Doyle and Tobias, 2001). Discussions on the history of informed consent often distinguish between the consent practices of practitioners of clinical medicine and the consent practices of researchers using human subjects. The earliest authors of treatises on clinical medical ethics were guided by the principle of beneficence and dealt very little with the principle of autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Council of the United Nations University
    __"""""""''T=_~ .' _ REPORT OF THE COUNCIL OF THE UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY GENERAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL RECORDS: THIRTY -FOURTH SESSION SUPPLEMENT No. 31 (A/34/31) UNITED NATIONS New York, 1979 NOTE Symbols of United Nations docume~ts are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention ofsuch a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. {Original: Englis~­ Lf August 197'fl CONTENTS ParagralJhs REPORT OF THE COm~CIL OF THE UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY •• 1 - 32 1 ANNEXES 1. tlembers of the Council of the United Nations University 7 11. l1embers of the Council's Nominating Committee for a New Rector. .•••.•••.•••.••• •••. 9 Ill. Officers of the Council of the United Nations University•• 10 IV. Report of the Rector of the United Nations University to the Council of the United Nations University (July 1978-June 1979) •••••.•••••••••• 11 V. Hembers of Programme Advisory Committees and co-ordinators of subprogrammes and projects of the United Nations University. .• c •••••• • Q •••• 71 VI. Staff members of the United Nations University•••• 76 VII. Opinion of the Council of the United Nations University on the proposal of the Republic of Costa Rica for the establishment of a University for Peace ••••• 78 -iii- REPORT OF THE COUNCIL OF THE UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY 1. The Council of the United Nations University held both itf:-' e2.eventh and twelfth sessions in Tokyo, from 4 to 8 December 1978 and frOD 25 to 29 June 1979, respectively. During 1978-1979, the Council met for a total of 10 days to consider the University's pro~rammes, problems and progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Marcel Roche El Rostro Social Y Sensible De La Ciencia
    Dr. Marcel Roche El rostro social y sensible de la ciencia Engrandecer el papel de la ciencia en Venezuela y Latinoamérica, ha sido uno de los más importantes propósitos de este investigador. Su lucha constante y su perseverancia hacia la ejecución de proyectos que parecían imposibles dentro del sector científico, prueban que no existen excusas para demostrar que sí se puede hacer ciencia de calidad. Por Mandy C. Zambrano Figura insigne de la ciencia en Venezuela Si hay alguien con conocimiento de causa que puede hablar acerca de la ciencia en Venezuela, esa figura lleva por nombre Marcel Roche. Hijo de quien fuera uno de los más reconocidos urbanistas venezolanos, Luis Roche, Marcel vio despertar en si mismo, desde temprana edad, el interés que lo llevó a emprender una carrera, cuyos frutos son sinónimo de importantes y significativos logros, a favor del desarrollo y avance del sector científico nacional. Médico y científico, o también “médico investigador”, término que él mismo se adjudicó alguna vez, ha fungido como uno de los principales promotores en la creación y fundación de importantes organizaciones como el Instituto de Investigaciones Médicas de la Fundación Luis Roche, el Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC) y el Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (Conicit), sólo por mencionar las más importantes. Cabe destacar que durante toda su carrera, Marcel Roche se ha preocupado por mostrar el lado social y sensible de la ciencia, así como también la importancia que ésta tiene para el desarrollo económico y cultural de las naciones. Prueba de ello, se puede encontrar en una serie de publicaciones y ensayos escritos por él, y en su labor como director y editor de Interciencia, una de las revistas de divulgación científica más importantes de habla hispana.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnobotany of the Yanomami Indians
    The Ethnobotany of the Yanomami Indians Ghillean T. Prance Editor’s Note The following was originally presented as a keynote ad- dress to the Building Bridges with Traditional Knowledge The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (2001) issued a state- Summit meeting held in Honolulu, Hawai’i in May- June ment in defense of the well-known geneticist and physi- 2001. At the time, controversy over the publication of cian, the late James V. Neel. In fact the published version Darkness in El Dorado was raging. Sir Ghillean Prance of Tierney’s book considerably toned down his accusa- provided this introduction to a pictoral essay on Yanomani tions against Neel which were made in material released ethnobotany. It is included here because it presented an prior to publication that accused Neel of deliberately caus- ethnobiologist’s perspective on the controversy as well as ing a devastating outbreak of measles among the Yano- a brief overview of literature on yanomani ethnobotany. mami to test his eugenic theories. The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (2001) came out with a strong point by point defense of Neel that ends with the words: The Yanomami “We are convinced that the scientific enterprise, whatever it is, demands a permanent ethical I have decided to speak on the ethnobotany of the Yano- concern. But it is important to be aware of sen- mami people here because this group has recently been sationalist distortions and manipulations. It is the topic of much controversy since the publication of the deplorable that such gross charges have been book Darkness in El Dorado by investigative journalist Pat- raised against a person of a moral and scientific rick Tierney (2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Un Análisis De La Obra Científica De Humberto Fernández- Morán, a Los Veinte Años De Su Muerte
    ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL Gac Méd Caracas 2018;126(4):304-325 Un análisis de la obra científica de Humberto Fernández- Morán, a los veinte años de su muerte Drs. José Esparza¹, Raúl Padrón² RESUMEN fracasos, con una mente brillante y una visión y pasión Hace veinte años murió en Estocolmo, Suecia, Humberto por las cosas importantes. Este Fernández-Morán más Fernández-Morán (1924-1999), uno de los científicos real, puede servir de un mejor ejemplo a las generaciones venezolanos más renombrados durante la segunda mitad jóvenes de científicos venezolanos. del siglo XX. Su más importante contribución a la Palabras clave: Crío-microscopia electrónica, Hospital ciencia en Venezuela fue la creación en 1954 del Instituto General de Massachusetts, Humberto Fernández-Morán, Venezolano de Neurología e Investigaciones Cerebrales Instituto Karolinska, IVIC, IVNIC, microscopia electrónica, (IVNIC) que después de la caída del gobierno militar Universidad de Chicago. de Pérez Jiménez se transformó en el actual Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC). En febrero de 1958, Fernández-Morán salió de Venezuela en SUMMARY exilio voluntario, para trabajar en Estados Unidos hasta Twenty years ago died in Stockholm, Sweden, Humberto 1986. Su salida fue interpretada por algunos, como una Fernández-Morán (1924-1999), one of the most renowned injusta reacción hacia un eminente científico, por tan solo Venezuelan scientists during the second half of the twentieth haber servido como Ministro de Educación en los últimos century. His most important contribution to science in diez días del gobierno de Pérez Jiménez. Con los años, Venezuela was the creation in 1954 of the Venezuelan sus amigos y admiradores iniciaron una campaña para Institute of Neurology and Brain Research (IVNIC) that, su reivindicación, incrementada a partir de 1964, cuando after the fall of the military government of Pérez Jiménez, Fernández-Morán comenzó a visitar más frecuentemente a was transformed into the current Venezuelan Institute of Venezuela, manifestando su deseo de regresar al país.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcel Roche, the Founding Editor of Interciencia
    EDITORIAL MARCEL ROCHE, THE FOUNDING EDITOR OF INTERCIENCIA Forty six years ago, in 1974, the Interciencia Association to communicate science in its most varied dimensions: to was established in Recife, and registered as such in Cara- present results of biomedical research and of SSS, to set cas, in 1975. Among the first decisions of its members was the pace of values and behaviors of new institutions such the creation of Interciencia, a journal oriented to stimulate as IVIC and CONICIT, and to disseminate science, having “scientific research, its humanitarian use, and the study of been recognized for the latter with the UNESCO’s Kalinga its social context, specially in Latin America and the Carib- Prize in 1987. bean, and to promote communication between the scientific Roche the founding editor of Interciencia has left his and technological communities of the Americas”. It was to fingerprint as a man of two cultures. The cover of the be published in Spanish, English and Portuguese. journal, where a work of art by an artist of the Americas is The responsibility of organizing it and get it started reproduced in each issue, has become one of its distinctive was given to Marcel Roche Dugand (Caracas 1920 - Miami features; and it merges with the contents of research papers 2003), a Venezuelan scientist of extensive career both in the showing how science and art can be in brotherhood. scientific sphere as well as in science policy in the region. For years the publishing office of Interciencia was in He remained its editor from 1976 to 1999. Caracas, allowing me to be witness of the initial years of Roche graduated as physician at the Johns Hopkins the journal, the eagerness to attract good scientific material, University Medical School in 1946, and pursued his res- the refereeing process and placing the journal in a good idence and specialization in North American institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • 81 Marcel Roche
    Freites. Marcel Roche. MARCEL ROCHE: PREMIO KALINGA 1987 Yajaira Freites Investigadora en el Laboratorio de Estudio de la Ciencia, Centro de Transformaciones Sociales, Ciencia y Conocimiento, IVIC Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC) (Altos de Pipe, Venezuela). AP. 20632, Caracas 1020A, Venezuela [email protected] Resumen Marcel Roche nació en Caracas, Venezuela. Eminente científico, también fue gerente de la ciencia. Fue el director fundador del Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC) y presidente del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONICIT), así como un fecundo escritor sobre temas de divulgación científica. Palabras clave Marcel Roche, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Premio Kalinga. MARCEL ROCHE: KALINGA AWARD 1987 Abstract Marcel Roche was born in Caracas, Venezuela. Other than as an outstanding scientist, he also performed as the manager of several scientific institutions. He was the Director-founder of the Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), and President of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONICIT). He was also a prolific popularizer of scientific themes. Key word Marcel Roche, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Kalinga Prize. Marcel Roche Dugand nació en Caracas el 15 de agosto de 1920 y falleció en Miami (E.U.A) el 3 de mayo de 2003. Médico, científico, gerente y divulgador de la ciencia, humanista. De todas estas descripciones la única con la que no siempre se sintió a gusto fue con la de médico, pues ejerció poco y le dedicó su esfuerzo a los otros cuatro oficios, en los que sin duda sobresalió.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin American Science, Technology, and Society: a Historical and Reflexive Approach
    Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society ISSN: (Print) 2572-9861 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ttap20 Latin American science, technology, and society: a historical and reflexive approach Pablo Kreimer & Hebe Vessuri To cite this article: Pablo Kreimer & Hebe Vessuri (2018) Latin American science, technology, and society: a historical and reflexive approach, Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 1:1, 17-37, DOI: 10.1080/25729861.2017.1368622 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2017.1368622 © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 06 Sep 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1517 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ttap20 TAPUYA: LatIN AMERICAN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIEty, 2017 VOL. 1, NO. 1, 17–37 https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2017.1368622 OPEN ACCESS Latin American science, technology, and society: a historical and reflexive approach1 Pablo Kreimera,b,c and Hebe Vessuria,d,e aConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas – CONICET (National Scientific and Technical Research Council), Buenos Aires, Argentina; bCentro de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad – CCTS (Science, Technology & Society Center), Universidad Maimónides, Buenos Aires, Argentina; cUniversidad Nacional de Quilmes (UNQ), Buenos Aires, Argentina; dCentro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental – CIGA, (Environmental Geography Research Centre), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Buenos Aires, México; eInstituto Patagónico de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas – IPCSH-CENPAT (Patagonian Institute for the Social and Human Sciences), Buenos Aires, Argentina ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The paper deals with the emergence and development the STS field Latin American STS; Science in Latin America, from the sixties on.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Council of the United Nations Uni7ersity on the Work of the University
    ~ . ; .. l ' " REPORT OF THE COUNCIL OF THE UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY GENERAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL RECORDS: THIRTIETH SESSION SUPPLEMENT No. 31 (A/10031) ,,175 UNITED NATIONS REPORT OF THE COUNCIL OF THE UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY GENERAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL RECORDS: THIRTIETH SESSION SUPPLEMENT No. 31 {A/10031) UNITED NATIONS New York, 1975 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nabons document. {Original: Englis~ CONTENTS Paragraphs INTRODUCTION ....... 0 1 - 2 1 PART ONE: FOURTH SESSION OF THE COUNCIL . 3 - 31 2 I. Introduction ... 0 • • 3 - 6 2 11. Adoption of the agenda •. 7 3 Ill. Election of officers .•. 8 3 IV. Work of the fourth session . 9 - 29 4 V. Arrangements for the fifth session .. ~ 30 9 VI. Other questions 31 9 PART TWO: FIFTH SESSION OF THE COUNCIL 32 - 67 10 I. Introduetion ....... 32 10 11. Meetings of the Committees of the Council 33 - 34 10 Ill. Adoption of the agenda . 0 35 10 IV 0 Work of the fifth session 36 - 59 11 Vo Arrangements for the sixth and seventh sessions 60 61 17 VI. Other questions 62 - 67 18 ANNEXES Io A. List of participants in the fourth session of the Council. 20 B. List of participants in the fifth session of the Council 21 11. Composition of the Comnlittees . .. .. .. 23 Ill. Comments of the Executive Director of the United Nations Institute for Training and Research on the relationship between UNITAR and the United Nations University •.•. 24 -iii- CONTENTS (continued) IV. Comments of the Rector of the United Nations University on the relationship between UNITAR and the United Nations University .•..••• .
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnobotany of the Yanomami Indians
    The Ethnobotany of the Yanomami Indians Ghillean T. Prance Editor’s Note The following was originally presented as a keynote ad- dress to the Building Bridges with Traditional Knowledge The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (2001) issued a state- Summit meeting held in Honolulu, Hawai’i in May- June ment in defense of the well-known geneticist and physi- 2001. At the time, controversy over the publication of cian, the late James V. Neel. In fact the published version Darkness in El Dorado was raging. Sir Ghillean Prance of Tierney’s book considerably toned down his accusa- provided this introduction to a pictoral essay on Yanomani tions against Neel which were made in material released ethnobotany. It is included here because it presented an prior to publication that accused Neel of deliberately caus- ethnobiologist’s perspective on the controversy as well as ing a devastating outbreak of measles among the Yano- a brief overview of literature on yanomani ethnobotany. mami to test his eugenic theories. The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (2001) came out with a strong point by point defense of Neel that ends with the words: The Yanomami “We are convinced that the scientific enterprise, whatever it is, demands a permanent ethical I have decided to speak on the ethnobotany of the Yano- concern. But it is important to be aware of sen- mami people here because this group has recently been sationalist distortions and manipulations. It is the topic of much controversy since the publication of the deplorable that such gross charges have been book Darkness in El Dorado by investigative journalist Pat- raised against a person of a moral and scientific rick Tierney (2000).
    [Show full text]
  • NATURAL RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS V the Laboratory
    [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 12, No. 2, 1970, P. 509-525] INSTITUTO VENEZOLANO DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS NATURAL RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS V M. A. TAMERS Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas Department of Chemistry, Caracas, Venezuela The laboratory has been operating more than five years, supported entirely from Venezuelan government funds. Approximately 530 samples have been dated to the end of 1969. Of these, 40% are archaeologic specimens, the majority (141 samples) from Venezuela. Materials from most other countries of Latin America have been processed. The rest of the samples are from research programs of the Radiocarbon Laboratory itself. Thirty per cent of the total are measurements on carbonate species extracted from Venezuelan ground water aquifers. In years previous to the inauguration of the Caracas laboratory (November, 1963), only 56 samples from Venezuela had been accepted by foreign universities (Rouse and Cruxent, 1963). Establishment of a radiocarbon dating facility permits scientists in this country to eliminate dependence on distant laboratories in the United States or Europe. Furthermore, possibilities for studies have expanded considerably and important cultural, scientific, and practical advances have been made. The pre-history of the entire Caribbean area is now being investigated (Cruxent and Rouse, 1969), as well as details in the Venezuelan chrono- logy (Wagner, 1967; Zucchi, 1965). Ground waters of the arid zones of this country have been thoroughly sampled and critical facts have emerged (Tamers, 1967b). For example, it was found that the unique fresh water supply for the second largest city in Venezuela comes from a fossil ground water deposit that could be exhausted in the near future.
    [Show full text]