European Parliamentary Elections Bill [Bill 65 of 1997/98]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

European Parliamentary Elections Bill [Bill 65 of 1997/98] The European Parliamentary Elections Bill [Bill 65 of 1997/98] Research Paper 97/120 19 November 1997 This Research Paper examines the background to the European Parliamentary Elections Bill (Bill 65 of 1997/98) and explains its provisions. The Bill provides for voters to choose between parties, rather than individual candidates, and further legislation to deal with the registration of parties is expected in this session, and this Paper does not cover that aspect. The introduction of a regional list form of election for the next European Parliament elections for 1999 will be the first time that proportional representation (PR) has been used throughout Great Britain (Northern Ireland uses the single transferable vote (STV) for European Parliamentary and local elections). Research Paper 97/26 Voting Systems - the Alternatives provides background to the various forms of PR used in other countries, and proposed for the United Kingdom. Oonagh Gay Home Affairs Section House of Commons Library Library Research Papers are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Summary A commitment to introduce a uniform electoral system for elections to a new European assembly was part of the original Treaty of Rome but when the first direct elections were held in 1979 Great Britain used the First Past The Post system, with STV for Northern Ireland. The Commons had rejected on 13 December 1977, on a free vote, the option of a regional list system for Great Britain. Despite attempts by the European Parliament to devise common principles, the Council of Ministers has yet to implement a common, new system. Other EU states continue to use a variety of forms of election but all can be categorised as PR systems. The European Parliamentary Elections Bill introduces a regional list system for elections in Great Britain, and retains STV for Northern Ireland. If the Bill is passed, for the first time on voters in Great Britain will choose between parties, rather than individual candidates (although independent candidates are possible). Traditional territorial constituencies for the European Parliament would be replaced by nine electoral regions in England and one electoral region respectively for Scotland and Wales. These electoral regions are based on those used for the Government Offices for the Regions established in 1994. If passed, the new system should be in place for the 1999 elections. The European Union has yet to establish a uniform electoral system for all Member States. Legislation will be required to establish a system of registration for political parties in a regional list system and much of existing electoral law would need to be redrafted to acknowledge the presence of parties, rather than individual candidates in the electoral process. Such redrafting is also required for the proposed introduction of an Additional Member System to elect the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly. Such legislation is expected shortly. Under the Bill as currently drafted, voters will not have a choice between candidates on a party's list. The political parties would need to establish mechanisms for establishing an ordered list of candidates for each electoral region. The d'Hondt (or highest average) system is to be used to allocate votes between parties. Although many proponents of constitutional reform have welcomed the commitment to a PR system for the next European elections there have been some criticism of the lack of voter choice and the use of the d'Hondt system, which tends to favour larger parties. Others have queried the necessity for a new form of election at all, given that no uniform electoral system for the European Parliament has yet been agreed. CONTENTS Summary I Background 5 1. Uniform Electoral Procedure 5 2. The European Assembly Elections Bill 8 3. The De Gucht Report 11 4. The Plant Report 16 5. Recent Developments 17 6. Parliamentary Boundary Commissions 21 7. Selection of candidates 21 II The European Parliamentary Elections Bill [Bill 65 of 1997/98] 23 1. The Bill in Detail 24 2. Reactions to the Bill 30 Map of European Parliamentary Constituencies and Government Offices 32 of the Regions in England and Wales Appendix 1 Systems in other EU States 33 Appendix 2 Relevant electoral statistics 36 Research Paper 97/120 I Background 1. Uniform Electoral Procedure Article 138(3)1 of the Treaty of Rome required the European Parliament to "draw up proposals for elections by direct universal suffrage in accordance with a uniform electoral procedure in all Member States. The Council [of Ministers] shall, acting unanimously, lay down the appropriate provisions which it shall recommend to Member States for adoption in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements". Since her accession to the Community on 1 January 1973 the UK has been a party to this undertaking. Agreement to hold direct elections was finally reached on 20 September 1976 between all nine Member States with the signing of a Council Decision.2 The text was published in the UK as an annex to the Council of Ministers' decision as Cmnd 6623. Article 2 of the Act (EC) set out the number of seats allocated to each Member State. In May 1976 the Government arranged for the appointment of a select committee to consider proposals for direct elections to the Assembly. The Second Report of the Select Committee3 recommended the retention of the First Past the Post (FPTP) system in European constituencies formed by grouping parliamentary constituencies in a curtailed Boundary Commission procedure (paras 20-22). This report was never debated by the House. In April 1977 a White Paper with 'green edges' was published.4 Part I discussed the pros and cons of possible electoral systems but drew no conclusion except to insist "the special circumstances of Northern Ireland make it appropriate for direct elections there to be conducted by a system of proportional representation" (para 20). The Paper was debated on 20 and 25 April 1977.5 The White Paper suggested the use of existing economic planning regions for allocating Parliamentary seats to regions and a modified list system with an 'open' ballot paper so that the voter could choose between named candidates. 1 This Article has now been renumbered Article 190 following the Treaty of Amsterdam, where an addition to the text was made. See below p.15 2 (76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom) Act concerning the election of the Representatives of the Assembly by direct universal suffrage 3 HC 515 Session 1975/76 4 Direct Elections to the European Assembly (Cmnd 6768) 5 HC Deb. vol 930 c.200-33 and c.735-960 5 14. There are other considerations which result from some of the inherent characteristics of the existing British system. One of these characteristics is the tendency for swings in electoral opinion to be magnified in terms of seats won or lost. This is regarded by many as an advantage in the context of Westminster elections where a Government is being elected. In the context of European elections, however, it might be regarded as a less desirable feature. This would be especially so if, as some studies have suggested, the relatively small number of Assembly constituencies (81 as compared with 635 Westminster constituencies) further magnified the effect with a final result in terms of seats which was quite disproportionate to votes cast. There is the further point that, particularly if Assembly elections fell mid-way between General Elections to Westminster there could be a wide divergence between the balance of power at Westminster and the Party composition of the United Kingdom members of the European Assembly. In one respect, given the advisory nature of the European Assembly, this might not be a matter of much concern; but in a developing situation it could lead to friction between the Government at Westminster and the UK representatives in the directly elected European Assembly or even between the Government and the Assembly itself. 15. It would be possible to resolve some of these problems by adopting a system of proportional representation for elections to the European Assembly. Since the European Assembly does not constitute a legislature or provide a government, and since its members do not have the same constituency responsibilities as a Westminster MP, proportional representation for the European Assembly might not be open to the same objections as proportional representation for the Westminster Parliament. A different institution might warrant a different form of election. 16. A list system could be devised based on the whole of the United Kingdom or Great Britain; or on separate lists for their constituent parts; or England could be sub- divided into regions or constituencies, each being allocated a number of members on the basis of electorate. The adoption of a list system would bring us into line with the majority of our European partners and would ensure that the allocation of seats was more proportional to the votes cast for the competing Parties. It would also have advantages in the speed with which it could be brought into operation, since there would not be more than about a dozen regions and even if Boundary Commission procedures were necessary they would be less elaborate than would be required to define 81 new constituencies. (Annex B shows how a regional list system might work in practice.) 17. To abandon our traditional method in this way would be a major constitutional innovation, the consequences of which are difficult to foresee. It would mean the absence of the sort of constituency link with which we are familiar and could lead to changes in Party organisations, including giving the central or regional Party organisations a bigger role in nominating candidates.
Recommended publications
  • The History of the First Presbyterian Church Charlottesville, Virginia
    The History of the First Presbyterian Church Charlottesville, Virginia “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27 Robert E. Simpson Introduction Like many organizations with a time-honored history, the church documents its past in the tangibility of faces, official papers, portraits, material objects, and buildings. Expressed algebraically, history is the evidence of people added to places divided by time, a formula consciously present here. History, says the philosopher, counts Time not by the Hours but by the Ages. Time therefore is a vehicle by which each of us has traveled, history is knowing where that vehicle has been. The story of the First Presbyterian Church finds its beginnings back into the 18th century. This history will introduce you to many past and present citizens of Charlottesville and Albemarle County, and is but a speck in the story of the Church. To many we have not known, yet we have a sense of companionship. And, then there are those who we have known, and loved, and shared in Christian fellowship. For this history, I have relied heavily on primary sources: minutes of the various church courts; minutes of organizations of the church; letters; personal and written interview. In selecting items to be included, I have tried to make them representative of the life of the whole church. I realize that voices from the grave are mute, however, and items from the past which should have been included are known only to that great “cloud of witnesses” and to the Sovereign God.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Euro Manifesto
    Scottish Socialist Party European Election Manifesto 2004 for a different Europe europeanmanifesto part one About the SSP The Scottish Socialist Party is Scotland’s newest, fastest growing and most radical political party. Just six years old, the SSP now has six MSPs in the Scottish Parliament and a network of scores of branches in every corner of Scotland, from Stromness to Stranraer, from Selkirk to Stornoway. n the 2003 Scottish election, the All six Scottish Socialist MSPs also swing to the SSP was by far the most honoured their election pledges to live spectacular feature of a general upris- on no more than the average wage of a Iing against the four big parties, which skilled worker. Each of these MSPs lost over a million votes. donates half their salary to the party. In the first-past-the-post ballot, sup- The SSP is more than just another port for the SSP soared from under 1 per electoral party whose sole ambition is to cent to over 6 per cent. In the second get politicians elected into parliaments proportional ballot, the Scottish Socialist and councils. vote rose from just under 2 per cent to Most of our activity is conducted out- almost 7 per cent. With six MSPs, the side parliament, on the streets, in the SSP is represented across the whole of communities, in the workplaces, in the the central belt and southern Scotland, universities and colleges. from the Clyde to the Forth and from the Since 2001, the SSP has been the most Solway Firth to the North Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • SSP European Election Manifesto 2004
    Scottish Socialist Party European Election Manifesto 2004 for a different Europe europeanmanifesto part one About the SSP The Scottish Socialist Party is Scotland’s newest, fastest growing and most radical political party. Just six years old, the SSP now has six MSPs in the Scottish Parliament and a network of scores of branches in every corner of Scotland, from Stromness to Stranraer, from Selkirk to Stornoway. n the 2003 Scottish election, the All six Scottish Socialist MSPs also swing to the SSP was by far the most honoured their election pledges to live spectacular feature of a general upris- on no more than the average wage of a Iing against the four big parties, which skilled worker. Each of these MSPs lost over a million votes. donates half their salary to the party. In the first-past-the-post ballot, sup- The SSP is more than just another port for the SSP soared from under 1 per electoral party whose sole ambition is to cent to over 6 per cent. In the second get politicians elected into parliaments proportional ballot, the Scottish Socialist and councils. vote rose from just under 2 per cent to Most of our activity is conducted out- almost 7 per cent. With six MSPs, the side parliament, on the streets, in the SSP is represented across the whole of communities, in the workplaces, in the the central belt and southern Scotland, universities and colleges. from the Clyde to the Forth and from the Since 2001, the SSP has been the most Solway Firth to the North Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin
    1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin ... Page 1 of 10 UK Office of the European Parliament Home > 1999 > 1999 Election Candidates Candidates The list of candidates was based on the information supplied by Regional Returning Officers at the close of nominations on 13 May 2004. Whilst every care was taken to ensure that this information is accurate, we cannot accept responsibility for any omissions or inaccuracies or for any consequences that may result. Voters in the UK's twelve EU constituencies will elect 78 MEPs. The distribution of seats is as follows: Eastern: 7 East Midlands: 6 London: 9 North East: 3 North West: 9 South East: 10 South West: 7 West Midlands: 7 Yorkshire and the Humber: 6 Scotland: 7 Wales: 4 Northern Ireland: 3 Eastern LABOUR CONSERVATIVE 1. Eryl McNally, MEP 1. Robert Sturdy, MEP 2. Richard Howitt, MEP 2. Christopher Beazley 3. Clive Needle, MEP 3. Bashir Khanbhai 4. Peter Truscott, MEP 4. Geoffrey Van Orden 5. David Thomas, MEP 5. Robert Gordon 6. Virginia Bucknor 6. Kay Twitchen 7. Beth Kelly 7. Sir Graham Bright 8. Ruth Bagnall 8. Charles Rose LIBERAL DEMOCRAT GREEN 1. Andrew Duff 1. Margaret Elizabeth Wright 2. Rosalind Scott 2. Marc Scheimann 3. Robert Browne 3. Eleanor Jessy Burgess 4. Lorna Spenceley 4. Malcolm Powell 5. Chris White 5. James Abbott 6. Charlotte Cane 6. Jennifer Berry 7. Paul Burall 7. Angela Joan Thomson 8. Rosalind Gill 8. Adrian Holmes UK INDEPENDENCE PRO EURO CONSERVATIVE PARTY 1. Jeffrey Titford 1. Paul Howell 2. Bryan Smalley 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Mixed-Member Proportional Representation in Scotland and Wales: Lessons from Germany?
    The Impact of Mixed-Member Proportional Representation in Scotland and Wales: Lessons from Germany? Thomas Carl Lundberg Keele European Parties Research Unit (KEPRU) Working Paper 20 © Thomas Carl Lundberg, 2003 ISSN 1475-1569 ISBN 1-899488-18-9 KEPRU Working Papers are published by: School of Politics, International Relations and the Environment (SPIRE) Keele University Staffs ST5 5BG, UK Tel +44 (0)1782 58 4177/3088/3452 Fax +44 (0)1782 58 3592 www.keele.ac.uk/depts/spire/ Editor: Professor Thomas Poguntke ([email protected]) KEPRU Working Papers are available via SPIRE’s website. Launched in September 2000, the Keele European Parties Research Unit (KEPRU) was the first research grouping of its kind in the UK. It brings together the hitherto largely independent work of Keele researchers focusing on European political parties, and aims: • to facilitate its members' engagement in high-quality academic research, individually, collectively in the Unit and in collaboration with cognate research groups and individuals in the UK and abroad; • to hold regular conferences, workshops, seminars and guest lectures on topics related to European political parties; • to publish a series of parties-related research papers by scholars from Keele and elsewhere; • to expand postgraduate training in the study of political parties, principally through Keele's MA in Parties and Elections and the multinational PhD summer school, with which its members are closely involved; • to constitute a source of expertise on European parties and party politics for media and other interests. The Unit shares the broader aims of the Keele European Research Centre, of which it is a part.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Session 2007-2008
    PRIZE LECTURES Security, Insecurity, Paranoia and Quantum Mechanics .................................. 46 New Antibiotics from the Sea Bed to the Hospital Bed .................................. 64 100 Years of Radio Astronomy: Past, Present and Future ............................... 69 Fuelling the Fire: On How Obesity Fuels D isease.............................................................................................................. 74 Mind, Matter and Mathematics ..................................................................... 79 45 Review of the Session 2007-2008 James Scott Prize Lecture Security, Insecurity, Paranoia and Quantum Mechanics Stephen M. Barnett SUPA, Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde 4 February 2008 The James Scott Prize Lectureship was established in 1918 in memory of James Scott, a farmer at East Pittendreich, near Brechin, by the Trustees of his Bequest. This prize is awarded quadrennially for a lecture on the fundamental concepts of Natural Philosophy. This year’s award goes to Professor Stephen Barnett FRS FRSE, who is based in the Department of Physics at the University of Strathclyde. Professor Barnett is one of the world’s most eminent scientists in the field of Quantum Optics. A previous winner of the Institute of Physics’ Maxwell Medal, he is perhaps best known for his co-discovery of the Barnett-Pegg phase operator. This established the first formally correct approach for handling both angles and phase as descriptions within quantum systems. Still within quantum physics, Professor Barnett holds a number of patents relating to techniques for writing unbreakable codes. For a subject that is potentially beyond most people’s understanding, Professor Barnett is well known for presenting the counter-commonsense implications of quantum mechanics in an accessible and entertaining way, stripping the subject of its supporting mathematics and leaving only the essence of pure ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • FSC Contents FSC Contents.Qxd
    REVIEWS (Composite)_REVIEWS (Composite).qxd 13/06/2017 09:58 Page 97 Reviews 97 Reviews We’re Labour’s countless Boris Dralyuk, 1917: Stories and Poems from the Russian Revolution, Pushkin Press, 2016, 236 pages, paperback, ISBN 9781782272144, £8.99 It was, as Charles Dickens said of another period, the best of times and the worst of times. Whereas, in 1902, Lenin had thought the great question of the day must be ‘What is to be done?’, by 1919, according to Mikhail Bulgakov, most people were asking ‘What will become of us?’. These are two quite different perspectives on the unknowns of the future, each in its own way as practical as the other. Lenin sought to do things, or to get things done, but the people whose voices Bulgakov was channelling, no matter who was in power, had already had and would later have things done to them, if occasionally on their behalf. No matter how actively involving the Revolution may have seemed and been, vast numbers were its passive beneficiaries and victims. Somewhere between the doing and the being done­to, writers appraised the frail hopes and sturdy fears of their fellow Russians. Often judiciously opting to tell their stories obliquely, they made creative opportunities out of the anticipation of censorship. Eventually, their task would extend, crucially, to the humanising of dehumanisation; but in the meantime, before the worse came to the worst, we encounter stories and poems that are surprisingly jaunty. The overall tone of this anthology, if many moods can be boiled down to one, is sceptically hopeful rather than hopeless.
    [Show full text]
  • A Flower of the Labour Movement
    Coates 8/26/05 9:41 PM Page 29 Ken Coates 1930-2010 Coates 8/26/05 9:41 PM Page 30 Tony Topham with Ken Coates and Ron Todd at the launch of their History of the Transport and General Workers’ Union in 1991. KC tributes 8/26/05 9:56 PM Page 31 31 A Flower I thought of, I think of Ken, as a venerable spreading tree under which we could sit, of the and, sitting there, learn what to do. Labour John Berger Movement He was a wonderful person, and will be sorely missed. Noam Chomsky * * * Ken was one of the best and most influential socialist activists, politicians, and writers of the European Left. From the Institute for Workers’ Control, the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation, European Nuclear Disarmament, the European Appeal for Full Employment, to Socialist Renewal, he played a leading part in the Left and the labour movement. Rare are people with such gifts: Ken combined a superb grasp of abstract economic and political issues, with the ability to organise within the broad trade union movement and peace campaigners. His experience as a coal miner (never worn as a trump against ‘intellectuals’), his easy relations with ordinary working people, and his enduring commitment to grass-roots activity, earned him great respect. Many spontaneous tributes I came into direct contact with Ken to Ken Coates were during his period as a Member of the published when his death European Parliament (1989 to 1999). The was announced in June European Full Employment Conventions 2010. We reprint a small (both held in Brussels at the Parliament) selection, together with had a wide echo.
    [Show full text]
  • Region South Scotland Date of 5 May 2011 Election
    Scottish Parliamentary Election Notice of Election Agents Region South Scotland Date of 5 May 2011 election I, Alex Haswell, Regional Returning Officer hereby give notice that the following names and addresses of election agents of candidates at this election and the addresses of the offices or places of such election agents to which all claims, notices, legal process, and other documents addressed to them may be sent, have respectively been declared in writing to me as follows: Name of Party and Name of Agent Address of Agent Offices of Election Candidates Agent to which claims etc may be sent All Scotland Pensioners Party Donald Sharp 33 Browncarrick Drive 33 Browncarrick Drive Don Sharp Ayr Ayr David Mathieson KA7 4JA KA7 4JA John Higgins Ken Bradley John Speed Eric Aitken British National Party Mark Walker 7 Rievalx Court 3A Western Bank Mark Walker Spennymoor Industrial Estate Michael John Ward DL16 6XR Wigton Frank Nicholson CA7 9SJ Dawn Charlton Scottish Christian Party Scott Keith 15 McKie Avenue Canaan “Proclaiming Christ’s Richardson Dumfries Mouswald Lordship” DG1 2HL Dumfries Scott Keith Richardson DG1 4JS Clive Eddy Steven Philip McCorkindale David Temple Scottish Conservative and Mark McInnes GFR, 9 Steel’s Place 1 Wellington Square Unionist Party Edinburgh Ayr Derek Scott Brownlee EH10 4QR KA7 1EN John Scott Peter John Duncan Gill Dykes Grant Stewart Fergusson Colin John McGavigan Scottish Green Party Chris Ballance 9 Beechgrove 9 Beechgrove Alis Ballance Moffat Moffat Chris Ballance DG10 9RS DG10 9RS Stephanie Johnstone
    [Show full text]
  • Defend Aamer Anwar Campaign
    ADVERTISEMENT DEFEND THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH ASIF SIDDIQUE (elder brother of Atif ALEX NEIL SNP, JAMIE HEPBURN SNP, IAN Siddique) “The Siddique family are angered Defend civil liberties McKEE SNP, MARGO McDONALD INDEPENDENT, and appalled at this attack on Aamer CHRISTINE GRAHAME SNP, SANDRA WHITE SNP, Anwar. It is an attempt to silence this AND ELAINE SMITH LABOUR PARTY (MSPS) “We courageous lawyer. The statement made are deeply concerned that Aamer Anwar is outside Glasgow’s High Court last year was Open letter in support of Aamer Anwar facing contempt of court. Conviction would the view of Atif Siddique and our family. We set a dangerous precedent, threatening the stand shoulder to shoulder with Aamer. It is MOHAMMAD Atif to the G8 Summit at Gleneagles and ability of lawyers to speak out against time to stand up and defend those who Siddique was defended demonstrators who were perceptions of injustice in the interests of defend our civil liberties. sentenced to eight arrested during the protests. their clients. The Scottish judicial system is, years in prison for Following the collapse of the and should be, robust enough to tolerate terrorism offences in World’s End trial, the Lord Advocate and absorb such criticism” IAIN BANKS (author) “Aamer October 2007. Irrespective of the stressed the importance of the Anwar is a symbol of differing views on the outcome of the independence of the judiciary and freedom. There is a need to case, the criticism levelled towards prosecution. Equally as important is ROSE GENTLE (Military speak out when the right to Mr Siddique’s solicitor, Aamer Anwar, an independent defence, which is Families Against War) “Aamer dissent and the right to over a statement he released on the often all that stands between the Anwar has fought injustice speak the truths that need to day of the verdict is disturbing.
    [Show full text]
  • KILMARNOCK ACADEMY: FORMER PUPILS Contents
    KILMARNOCK ACADEMY: FORMER PUPILS Contents: Gilbert Adair (1944–2011), novelist and screenwriter. Adamson, Janet Laurel (1882-1962), Labour MP Sir Stuart Atha (b.1962), RAF air marshall James Barr (1862-1949), minister & politician Matthew Black (1908-1994), biblical scholar John Bell (b.1949), church musician John Morton Boyd (1925-1998), conservationist David Murray Boyd (1926-2016) geophysicist William Boyd (1874-1962), educationalist Zachary Boyd (1585-1653), minister & university administrator John Caldwell (1903-1974), botanist Robert Colquhoun (1914-62), artist Craig Conway (b.1985), professional footballer Stewart Conn (b.1936), poet and playwright Sir David Paton Cuthbertson (1900-1989), medical researcher John Shaw Dunn (1883-1944), pathologist Sir James Macdonald Dunnett (1877–1953), imperial civil servant Robert Dunsmuir (1825-1889), Canadian industrialist and politician Sir Alexander Fleming (1881-1955), bacteriologist Helen Flockhart (b.1963), artist George Forrest (1873-1932), plant collector Sir George Fowlds (1860-1934) New Zealand minster of education Thomas Nisbet Gallacher (b. ?1946) HM Senior Chief Inspector of Schools in Scotland and cricketer Alexander Galt (1854-1938), physicist Hugh Miller Galt (1866-1936), pathologist Hugh S. D. Garven – medical missionary John Gilchrist (1924-2010), chief valuer for Scotland Ronald Hamilton (b.1945), footballer and chartered accountant Donald Stewart Hendrie (1909-64), agriculturalist William Hewitt (b.1951), Moderator of the General Assembly Bernard Isaacs (1924-95), professor
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Elections 2003 Media Content Research
    The Scottish Elections 2003 Media Content Research Report to the Electoral Commission Institute of Governance University of Edinburgh 24 June 2003 Acknowledgements We would like to thank John McCormick, Douglas MacLeod and Linda Taylor of BBC Scotland for providing tapes of 'Good Morning Scotland, 'Reporting Scotland' and 'Newsnight Scotland'. Particular thanks are also due to Janet Pearse and Margaret MacPherson for their secretarial assistance in compiling this Report. CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 9 General Observations .............................................................................................11 Background .............................................................................................................12 Themes .....................................................................................................................15 Print Media...................................................................................................16 Broadcast Media..........................................................................................25 Week by Week Thematic Analysis .........................................................................35 Apathy...........................................................................................................35 Scottish Economy.........................................................................................42
    [Show full text]