DOCSLIB.ORG

2017-1608 Petition 68098.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017-1608 Petition 68098.Pdf Filing #61228839E-Filed08/31/201706:42:25PM RECEIVED, 08/31/201706:43:31 PM,Clerk,Supreme Court APPENDIX A University of Colorado at Boulder Department of sociology Ketchum 173 Michael L. Radelet 327 UCB Professor Boulder, Colorado 803094327 (303) 735-5811 Direct 932 2 8878 °'°'ª ° °ªª Affidavit ofMichael L. Radelet State of Colorado, County of Boulder The undersigned, Michael L. Radelet, hereby declares under penalty ofperjury: 1. I received a Ph.D. in sociology from Purdue University in 1977. After two years of postdoctoral training in Psychiatry at the University ofWisconsin Medical School, Ijoined the faculty at the University ofFlorida in 1979. After twenty-two years ofservice at that university (including the last five as Chair, Department of Sociology), I moved to the University of Colorado in September 2001 as a tenured Professor of Sociology, a position I still retain. I served as the Chair ofthe Sociology Department at the University of Colorado from 2004-2009. 2. Since 1981 I have published six books and six dozen scholarly papers, in the nation's top sociology, criminology, and lawjournals, relating to various aspects of capital punishment. See, for example, Miscarriages ofJustice in Potentially Capital Cases, 40 STANFORD LAW REVIEW 21-179 (1987); FACING THE DEATHPENALTY (Temple University Press, 1989); Choosing Those Who WillDie: Race and the Death Penalty in Florida, 43 FLORIDA LAW REVIEW 1-34 (1991); IN SPITE OF INNOCENCE (Northeastern University Press, 1992); EXECUTING 2 THE MENTALLY ILL (Sage Publications, 1993); THE HISTORY OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN COLORADO (University Press of Colorado, 2017). I have also testified on issues relating to the death penalty before committees ofthe U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives, and have been retained by the Racial and Ethnic Bias Study Commission ofthe Florida Supreme Court to research patterns of death sentencing in Florida. Between 2000-2003 I was retained by the Office ofthe Governor, State ofIllinois, to study race and death sentencing in that state. In January 2003 Govemor George Ryan commuted some 167 death sentences in Illinois in part because ofthat research. See Pierce and Radelet, Race, Region, andDeath Sentencing in Illinois, 1988-1997, 81 OREGON LAW REVIEW 39 (2002). 3. As part ofmy research, since 1979 I have collected and maintained data on every death penalty case in Florida. My work, including that derived from my Florida database, has been cited by the Supreme Court in a dozen cases. 4. One ofthose cases was Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993). In that opinion (at p. 415), Justice Rehnquist, writing the majority opinion (joined by Justices O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas), wrote "Executive clemency has provided the "fail safe" in our criminal justice system. ... Recent authority confirms that over the past century clemencyhas been exercised frequently in capital cases in which demonstrations of "actual innocence" have been made. See M. Radelet, H. Bedau, & C. Putnam, In Spite ofInnocence 282-356 (1992)." 5. This statement is a misrepresentation of our research. In addition to the cited paper, for the past 25 years I have closely followed commutations ofdeath sentences in the U.S. Michael L. Radelet & Barbara Zsembik, Executive Clemency in Post-Furman Cases, UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LAW REVIEW 27 (1993): 289-315. My list ofpost-1972 commutations is now maintained by the Death Penalty Information Center; see 3 http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/clemency,and it is widelyrecognized as the definitive list of post-Furman clemencies in death penalty cases in the U.S. Since 1972, only 78 death sentences in the US. have been commuted to prison terms on the individual merits ofthe case bypower of the Executive Branch.(including two by President Obama in 2017).1 6. At the same time - post-1972 - there have been 157 people released from America's death rows because of overwhelming evidence ofinnocence. This list oferroneous death sentences also originated with my work (in the 1987 STANFORD LAW REVIEW paper I coauthored that was cited by Justice Rehnquist et al. in Herrera v. Collins, noted above). Like my list of post-1972 commutations, this list offormer death row inmates released because of doubts about guilt is now maintained by the Death Penalty Information Center; see http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/innocence-list-those-freed-death-row, and is widely recognized as the definitive list ofpost-Furman inmates released from death rows in the U.S. because of strong doubts about guilt. 7. Since 1972, there have been only six death sentences in Florida commuted to prison terms through power ofExecutive Clemency. A brief description ofthese cases is appended at the end ofthis document. No death row inmate in Florida has seen his or her death sentence commuted by the Executive Branch in over 33 years. No death sentences were commuted by Govemors Wayne Mixon (who served for three days in 1987), Bob Martinez, Lawton Chiles, Buddy McKay (who served for less than a month in 1998-99), Jeb Bush, Charlie Christ, or Rick Scott (so far). Ofthe 157 death row exonerees mentioned above, Florida, with 26, has the most. 1 In addition, governors ofstates that were abolishing the death penalty ordered "mass grants" of commutations, but these commutations were not based on individual case characteristics. Included here are five comumtations in New Mexico (1986), 167 (and four pardons) by Gov. Ryan in Illinois (2003), eight in New Jersey (2007), an additional 15 by Gov. Quinn in Illinois (2011), and four in Maryland (2015). 4 Not a single one ofthese Florida exonerees obtained his freedom through powers of executive clemency. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. MICHAEL L. RADELET Sworn to and Signed before me, this 7 19 day ofFebruary, 2017: SUSAN K SIDERS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY 10 # 19984020 MY COMMfSSION EXPlRES JULY 6. 2018 NOTARY PUBLIC 5 Appendix I Florida Death Sentences Commuted, 1972-February20172 L Alford, Learie Leo. June 26, 1979. Alford was convicted on mostly circumstantial evidence ofthe January 1973 rape and murder of a 13 year old girl.3 In 1977, and eyewitness recanted the testimony he had given at trial and told the authorities that the true killer was much larger than Alford.4 The witness had been reluctant to come forward with this information after the trial because ofa fear ofbeing charged with perjury.5 At the clemency hearing before Florida's cabinet, the main argument made by Alford's attorney in favor of clemency was "Learie Alford did not commit the murder he was convicted of.',6 2. Gibson, Richard Henry. May 6, 1980. Gibson and three companions were involved in robbing and shooting two Brazilian seamen who were on leave in Jacksonville in 1975. One of the sailors died. At sentencing, Gibson's lawyer did not present any evidence and Gibson was sentenced to death.7 His accomplice was sentenced to life and two women who were involved in the crime were never imprisoned.8 Those sentencing disparities were apparently the reason for the commutation. 3. Hallman, Clifford. June 26, 1979. Hallman was convicted in 1973 of slitting the throat of a barmaid with a piece ofbroken glass.9 No arteries were cut, but the victim died ofsuffocation four days later. Hallman's attorneys argued that Hallman did not possess enough premeditation to render him guilty of first-degree murder. Furthermore, they alleged that had the victim received proper treatment at Tampa General Hospital, her death would have been prevented. Indeed, the victim's family successfully sued the hospital for $42,500 for malpractice. The original prosecutor in the case joined the plea for clemency.1° 4. Hoy, Darrell Edwin. January 9, 1980. Hoy was convicted ofparticipating in a rape and double murder.11 His accomplice, Jesse Hall, was the trigger man. Hall was originally sentenced to death, but after winning a retrial he was sentenced to life imprisonment. The trial juries originally recommended life sentences for both Hall and Hoy. At the clemency hearing, Hoy's attorney emphasized Hoy's youth (age 22 at the time of the crime), his low intelligence, and his susceptibilityto domination by Hall.12 2 Michael L. Radelet & Barbara Zsembik, Executive Clemency in Post-Furman Cases, UNIVERs1TY OF RICHMoND LAW REVJEW 27 (1993): 289-315. 3 Alford v. State, 307 So.2d 433 (Fla. 1975), cert. denied, 428 U.S. 912 (1976). 4 Delbert L. Ibert, Two GetDecision on Mercy, TALLAHASSEE DEMoCRAT, June 20, 1979, at 1A, 9A. 3 Argument on behalfofLearie Alford, Transcript ofArgument for Executive Clemency at 13, April 20, 1979 (on file with Radelet). 6 Id. 7 Gibson v. State, 351 So.2d 948 (Fla. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1004 (1978). 8 Graham Commutes Gibson Sentence, FLA. TIMEs UNION (Jacksonville), May 7, 1980, at B4. 9 Hallman v. State, 305 So.2d 180 (Fla. 1974). ¹° Wayne Ezell, Hallman is Sure He 'll GetNew Trial, TALLAHASsEEDEMoCRAT, Sept. 8, 1977, at 1; Tom Fiedler, Is He CondemnedforHospital'sError?, MIAMI HERALD, Jan. 23, 1977, at 1; Ibert, supra note 4; Kevin Kalwary, Clz]ford Hallman, TAMPA TRIB., June 20, 1979, at 6A. " Hoy v. State, 353 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1978). ¹2 OfConvictions and Clemency (editorial), CLEARWATER SUN, Jan. 2, 1980, at 8A; David Pero, Hoy'sLzy'e Spared, CLEARWATER SUN, June 13, 1980, at 1A. 6 5. Rutledge, Jesse Raymond. April 19, 1983. In 1974, Rutledge was convicted ofbreaking into a home and stabbing a woman and her three children.¹³ The woman and one child died.¹4 Rutledge consistentlymaintained his innocence and the evidence strongly implicated another man, who was never indicted for the crime. The sentence was apparently commuted because of doubts about Rutledge's guilt." 6. Salvatore, Michael. May 19, 1981.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How a Confluence of Social Movements Convinced North Carolina to Go Where the Mccleskey Court Wouldnâ•Žt
    Michigan State University College of Law Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law Faculty Publications 1-1-2011 Confronting Race: How a Confluence of Social Movements Convinced North Carolina to Go where the McCleskey Court Wouldn’t Barbara O'Brien Michigan State University College of Law, [email protected] Catherine M. Grosso Michigan State University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.msu.edu/facpubs Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, and the Other Law Commons Recommended Citation Barbara O'Brien & Catherine M. Grosso, Confronting Race: How a Confluence of Social Movements Convinced North Carolina to Go where the McCleskey Court Wouldn’t, 2011 Mich. St. L. Rev. 463 (2011). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONFRONTING RACE: HOW A CONFLUENCE OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS CONVINCED NORTH CAROLINA TO GO WHERE THE MCCLESKEY COURT WOULDN’T Barbara O’Brien & Catherine M. Grosso∗ 2011 MICH. ST. L. REV. 463 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 463 I. THE LONG STRUGGLE TO CONFRONT RACE IN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT ........................................................................................... 467 A. The Constitutional Litigation Strategy Disappoints When the Court Won’t Bite .................................................................... 467 B. Back to Basics: A More Incremental Approach to Reform ......... 472 II. A CONFLUENCE OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Here Is a “Policy” Or “Custom” When There Was Significant Evidence of Brady Violations by the Orleans Parish District Attorney in This and Many Other Cases
    No. _________ ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- EARL TRUVIA; GREGORY BRIGHT, Petitioners, v. HARRY F. CONNICK, in his capacity as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans; GEORGE HEATH, Detective, Individually and in his official capacity as Officer of the City of New Orleans Police Department; JOSEPH MICELI, Individually and in his official capacity as Officer of the City of New Orleans Police Department; THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; EDDIE JORDAN, Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ERWIN CHEMERINSKY PHILLIP E. FRIDUSS Counsel of Record LANDRUM, FRIDUSS UNIVERSITY OF & ASH, LLC CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 8681 Highway 92 SCHOOL OF LAW Suite 400 401 E. Peltason Woodstock, Georgia 30189 Irvine, California 92697-8000 (678) 384-3012 (949) 824-7722 [email protected] [email protected] ROBIN BRYAN CHEATHAM WILLIAM T. MITCHELL ADAMS & REESE, LLP MICHAEL HOFFER One Shell Square CRUSER & MITCHELL, LLP 701 Poydras St., Suite 4500 275 Scientific Dr. New Orleans, Louisiana 70139 Suite 2000 (504) 581-3234 Norcross, Georgia 30092 [email protected] (404) 881-2622 [email protected] [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty
    California District Attorneys Association Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty Produced in collaboration with the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation MARCH 2003 GILBERT G. OTERO LAWRENCE G. BROWN President Executive Director Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty MARCH 2003 CDAA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICERS DIRECTORS PRESIDENT John Paul Bernardi, Los Angeles County Gilbert G. Otero Imperial County Cregor G. Datig, Riverside County SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT Bradford Fenocchio, Placer County David W. Paulson Solano County James P. Fox, San Mateo County SECRETARY-TREASURER Ed Jagels, Kern County Jan Scully Sacramento County Ernest J. LiCalsi, Madera County SERGEANT-AT-ARMS Martin T. Murray, San Mateo County Gerald Shea San Luis Obispo County Rolanda Pierre Dixon, Santa Clara County PAST PRESIDENT Frank J. Vanella, San Bernardino County Gordon Spencer Merced County Terry Wiley, Alameda County Acknowledgments The research and preparation of this document required the effort, skill, and collaboration of some of California’s most experienced capital-case prosecutors and talented administration- of-justice attorneys. Deep gratitude is extended to all who assisted. Special recognition is also deserved by CDAA’s Projects Editor, Kaye Bassett, Esq. This paper would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of the California District Attorneys Association’s Death Penalty White Paper Ad Hoc Committee. CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION DEATH PENALTY WHITE PAPER AD HOC COMMITTEE JIM ANDERSON ALAMEDA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TAMI R. BOGERT CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION SUSAN BLAKE CRIMINAL JUSTICE LEGAL FOUNDATION LAWRENCE G. BROWN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION WARD A. CAMPBELL CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE BRENDA DALY SAN DIEGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE DANE GILLETTE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE DAVID R.
    [Show full text]
  • Absent Accountability: How Prosecutorial Impunity Hinders the Fair Administration of Justice in America Scott .J Krischke
    Journal of Law and Policy Volume 19 | Issue 1 Article 14 2010 Absent Accountability: How Prosecutorial Impunity Hinders the Fair Administration of Justice in America Scott .J Krischke Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp Recommended Citation Scott .J Krischke, Absent Accountability: How Prosecutorial Impunity Hinders the Fair Administration of Justice in America, 19 J. L. & Pol'y (2010). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol19/iss1/14 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Policy by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. ABSENT ACCOUNTABILITY: HOW PROSECUTORIAL IMPUNITY HINDERS THE FAIR ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN AMERICA Scott J. Krischke* “The primary responsibility of prosecution is to see that justice is accomplished.” – National District Attorney’s Association1 INTRODUCTION In the late afternoon of January 13, 2009, eighteen-year-old Rondell Rogers was marched from his jail cell at Orleans Parish Prison to Magistrate Court in New Orleans Criminal District Court.2 Wearing an orange jumpsuit and the chains required of the inmates of Orleans Parish Prison, Rogers took hobbled, jangling steps over to the defense table to begin a probable cause hearing. Rogers, a local kid from the tough Mid-City neighborhood of New * Scott J. Krischke, BA DePaul University, JD Candidate Brooklyn Law School (expected 2011); Law Clerk for Orleans Public Defenders (2009), Cook County Public Defender’s Office (2010), and Legal Aid Society, Brooklyn (2010– 2011); Defense Investigator, Dinolt Becnel & Wells Investigative Group, Washington, DC (2007–2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Ellsworth American : June 5, 1918
    LOCAL AFFAIRS thy, Margaret Moore, Madeline Jordan, atitintiarnunta. Dorothy Crabtree, Karin filiation, Eliza- beth Linnehan, Lovina Moor, Janice NKW THIS ADVERTISE* KNTM WKF.K Abram, Madeline Hounds, Gertrude Dor- 1 Dr Barbrick g*n and Sylvia Grindal. Kefreshments BURRILL NATIONAL Men v»ant(d were served. BANK Order of notice Onion Trust Co There will be no collections of mail N K Tel A Tel Co ELLSWORTH, MAINE from the Furniture for sale street boxes on Sundays or holi- Water Power of Maine days until further notice. On those days First and J A Haynes—Groceries To Second Burrill hank s.atement persons mailing letters they wish for- Harvard Dental school warded without delay should drop them Hancock Co Hank Liberty Loan Subscribers Having* in the box. The Burrill National bank post-office youe BUNK HHvj'a garage —oecona- hand cars Mrs. Thomas F. Hoes who for the G W Alley Second-hand furniture man, Cat jrour May 15 interest if have few and the Character coupons you not done so, I«ost—Automobile lamp and number plate past weeks have been with her Capital, Resources, Ability, also all June 15 Interest coupons NOW. parents, H. H. Hooper and wife, has re- and Standing of the men who conduct its affairs We and turned to her home at N. urge recommend vour eichanging for Thrift and SCHEDULE OF MAILS Watertown, Y., are a War where Mr. Soesman is the superintendent what go to make up strong institu- Savings Stamps, a safe lie-investment and a Patri- *T BLLSWORTH FOSTOWCB. banking of the New York Air Brake munition otic I>uty.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Prosecutorial Accountability the JUSTICE PROJECT
    Improving Prosecutorial Accountability THE A Policy Review JUSTICE PROJECT By John F. Terzano, Esq., Joyce A. McGee, Esq., & Alanna D. Holt “ The prosecutor has more power over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America.” —UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL AND SUPREME COURT JusTICE ROBERT H. JACKSON EDUCATION THE JUSTICE PROJECT FUND ABOUT THE JUSTICE PROJECT “ The prosecutor has The Justice Project (TJP) is a non-profit, non- partisan organization dedicated to improving the more power over life, fairness and accuracy of the criminal justice system. TJP’s Campaign for Criminal Justice Reform seeks liberty, and reputation to reaffirm America’s core commitment to fairness than any other person and accuracy. By designing and implementing THE Improving Prosecutorial JUSTICE national and state-based reform efforts, the Accountability PROJECT in America.” Campaign for Criminal Justice Reform addresses A Policy Review —UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL significant flaws in the American criminal justice By John F. Terzano, Esq., Joyce A. McGee, Esq., & Alanna D. Holt system. AND SUPREME COURT JusTICE ROBERT H. JACKSON THE JUSTICE PROJECT StaFF John F. Terzano, President Joyce A. McGee, Executive Director Robert L. Schiffer, Executive Vice President TABLE OF CONTENTS Kirk Noble Bloodsworth, Program Officer Edwin Colfax, Director of State Campaigns Executive Summary ...................................................... 2 Rosa Maldonado, Controller Recommendations & Solutions .................................... 5 Leah Lavin, Development
    [Show full text]
  • Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to the Racial Justice Act
    STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE COUNTY OF STANLY SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 95 CRS 567 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) v. ) ) GUY TOBIAS LEGRANDE, Defendant. ) ........................................................... MOTION FOR APPROPRIATE RELIEF PURSUANT TO THE RACIAL JUSTICE ACT ............................................................ Defendant, Guy Tobias LeGrande, through counsel, files this Motion for Appropriate Relief pursuant to the Racial Justice Act (HA), N.C. Gen. Stat. $$ 15A-2010 to 15A-2012, the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and Art. I, $9 1, 19, 24, 26, and 27 of the North Carolina Constitution. Under the RJA and constitutional law, Defendant, who is currently under a sentence of death, is entitled to a sentence of life imprisonment without parole. INTRODUCTION 1. The evidence set out in this Motion establishes that race is a significant factor in North Carolina's system of capital punishment. The comprehensive, scientific study presented here demonstrates that race is a significant factor in capital proceedings. Prosecutors across the state strike eligible black and other racial minority venire members at double the rate they strike eligible white venire members and individuals who kill whites have significantly increased odds of receiving a death sentence than those who kill blacks or other racial minorities. 2. The evidence set out in this Motion also establishes that race is an extraordinarily significant factor in capital proceedings in the 20Ih ~rosecutorialDistrict. The disparity seen between the prosecutors' strikes of eligible black and other racial minority venire members compared to eligible white venire members is the highest of any district in North Carolina that has more than one person currently on death row.
    [Show full text]
  • Enter Your Title Here in All Capital Letters
    WAR FLAGS INTO PEACE FLAGS: THE RETURN OF CAPTURED MEXICAN BATTLE FLAGS DURING THE TRUMAN ADMINISTRATION by ETHAN M. ANDERSON B.A., South Dakota State University, 2008 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2010 Approved by: Major Professor Charles W. Sanders, Jr. Copyright ETHAN M. ANDERSON 2010 Abstract On September 13, 1950, in a culmination of three years of efforts by organizations and individuals inside and outside the Harry S. Truman administration, 69 captured battle flags from the Mexican-American War were formally returned to the Mexican government at a ceremony in Mexico City. The events surrounding the return of flags to Mexico occurred in two distinct phases. The first was a small, secretive, and largely symbolic return of three flags conceived and carried out by high-ranking U.S. government officials in June 1947. The second large-scale, public return of the remaining flags in the custody of the War Department was initiated by the American Legion and enacted by the United States Congress. Despite their differences, both returns were heavily influenced by contemporary events, primarily the presidential election of 1948 and the escalation of the Cold War. Also, although the second return was much more extensive than the President originally intended, it was only through his full support that either return was accomplished. In the decades since 1950, historians have either ignored the return of Mexican battle flags or focused instead on Truman’s wreath laying at the monument to the niños héroes in Mexico City in March 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-12 Men ' SB Asketball
    2 0 1 1 - 1 2 M EN ’ S B A S KET B ALL M EDIA S UPPLEMENT 2011 S OUTHLAND C ONFEREN C E T OURNAMENT C HAMPION S 2011 NCAA T OURNAMENT S E C OND R OUND 2011-12 UTSA R OADRUNNER S 0 • Mike White 1 • Stephen Franklin 2 • Kalif Bakare 3 • Larry Wilkins 4 • Sei Paye 6-8 • F/C • Sr.-1L 6-6 • F • Sr.-1L 5-11 • G • Jr.-1L 6-4 • F • Sr.-1L 6-3 • G • Sr.-3L Macon, Ga. Aurora, Colo. Houston, Texas San Antonio, Texas Houston, Texas 5 • Michael Hale III 11 • A.J. Price 12 • Jeromie Hill 13 • Igor Nujic 14 • Alex Vouyoukas 5-9 • G • Jr.-TR 6-2 • G • Fr.-HS 6-8 • F • So.-1L 6-8 • F • So.-1L 6-9 • F/C • Sr.-1L Federal Way, Wash. The Colony, Texas Cairns, Australia Perth, Australia Athens, Greece 20 • Ryan Whitehead 22 • Kannon Burrage 31 • Melvin Johnson III 32 • Jordan Sims 42 • Tyler Wood 6-0 • G • So.-1L 6-3 • G • Jr.-TR 6-5 • G • Jr.-2L 6-4 • G/F • So.-1L 6-6 • F • So.-1L Goodyear, Ariz. East Moline, Ill. Dallas, Texas El Mirage, Ariz. San Antonio, Texas Brooks Thompson Dan O’Dowd Robert Guster Jeff Renegar Shenton Wai Head Coach Associate Head Coach Assistant Coach Assistant Coach Team Operations Coordinator Sixth Season Sixth Season Sixth Season Fourth Season Third Season 2011-12 UTSA M EN ’ S B A S KET B ALL M EDIA S UPPLEMENT Media Information _______ Meet The Staff ____________ Record Book _____________ Roster _________________________ 2 Brooks Thompson ___________ 22-24 Team Records __________________ 50 Schedule _______________________ 3 Dan O’Dowd __________________ 25 Individual Records ______________ 51 Season Outlook ________________ 4-5 Robert Guster __________________ 26 Career Top 10 Lists __________ 52-53 Media Information ______________ 6 Jeff Renegar ___________________ 27 Single-Season Top 10 Lists ____ 54-55 Quick Facts ____________________ 7 Shenton Wai __________________ 28 1,000-Point Club _______________ 56 Broadcast Information____________ 7 Support Staff __________________ 29 Top 50 Scorers ________________ 57 Lynn Hickey ___________________ 30 Top Scoring Performances _______ 57 Meet The Roadrunners ___ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • In Loving Memory of Miss Irma Stepp
    ippa’s ong ALICEP LLOYD COLLEGE • THE JUNES BUCHANAN SCHOOL In loving memory of Miss Irma Stepp Spring 2021 Vol. 72 No. 1 Message from the President Dear Friends, Alice Lloyd and June Buchanan encouraged students to 100 Purpose Road discover their purpose here on Caney Creek, and ulti- Pippa Passes, Kentucky 41844 mately live a life of service. Our founders’ ideas helped Pippa’s Song is published for develop The Purpose Road Philosophy and were imple- friends, alumni, and students of Alice Lloyd College. Third class mented into every aspect of campus life. Today, students postage is paid at Pippa Passes, continue to learn about the philosophy and the impor- Kentucky. tance of leading through service to others. Upon gradu- ation, our students know that Purpose Road signposts, Spring 2021 | Vol. LXXII No. 1 such as Perseverance, Faith, Integrity, and Duty, are not just words but are necessary attributes in serving others. Institutional Advancement Office of Alice Lloyd College 100 Purpose Road The servant leadership ideals of Alice Lloyd College are Pippa Passes, Kentucky 41844 qualities I grew up learning through my wonderful par- 606-368-6024 | www.alc.edu ents, Joe and Irma Derderian Stepp. After my father died in 1999, Mom came to Caney Creek and served as Joe Alan Stepp an ALC volunteer until we recently lost her after a short President illness. “Miss Irma” became a campus mainstay and embodied Christian love through service to others. She deeply cared for ALC students as if they were her own, and I am humbled by Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Science in the Criminal Courtroom: Preventing Faulty Convictions
    TD Science in the Criminal Courtroom: Preventing Faulty Convictions Temple American Inn of Court November Team November 8th, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Forensic Science: Daubert’s Failure - Paul C. Giannelli 2. The (Near) Irrelevance of Daubert to Criminal Justice and Some Suggestions for Reform – Peter J. Neufield 3. Discovering Forensic Fraud – Jennifer D. Oliva & Valena E. Beety 4. Police Reports of Mock Suspect Interrogations: A Test of Accuracy and Perception – Saul M. Kassin, Jeff Kukucka, Victoria Z. Lawson, and John DeCarlo 5. Manipulation of Suspects and Unrecorded Questioning: After Fifty Years of Miranda Jurisprudence, Still Two (or Maybe Three) Burning Issues – Christopher Slobogin 6. Traces of Crime: How New York’s DNA Techniques Became Tainted – Lauren Kirchner 7. Syndrome: Medical Uncertainty Casts Doubt on Convictions – Molly Gena 8. Junk Science and the Execution of an Innocent Man – Paul C. Giannelli 9. The Shifted Paradigm: Forensic Science’s Overdue Evolution from Magic to Law – M. Chris Fabricant and Tucker Carrington August 30, 2017 FORENSIC SCIENCE: DAUBERT’S FAILURE 59 CASE W. RES. L. REV. __ (forthcoming) Paul C. Giannelli Distinguish University Professor Emeritus Case Western Reserve University I. Introduction A. Daubert/Rule 702 B. National Academy of Sciences Forensic Report (2009) II. Forensic Techniques A. Bite Mark Comparisons B. Microscopic Hair Analysis C. Firearms & Toolmark Identifications D. Fingerprint Examinations E. Comparative Bullet Lead Analysis F. Arson Evidence III. Forensic Science Research A. National Commission on Forensic Science (2013-17) B. White House PCAST Report (2016) IV. Conclusion 1 Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3031227 “The man who discovers a new scientific truth has previously had to smash to atoms almost everything he had learnt, and arrives at the new truth with hands bloodstained from the slaughter of a thousand platitudes.” — Jose Oreta y Gasset, The Revolt of the Masses ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel on Prosecutorial Immunity: Deconstructing Connick V. Thompson Dane Ciolino
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2012 Panel on Prosecutorial Immunity: Deconstructing Connick v. Thompson Dane Ciolino Gary Clements Bennett L. Gershman Adam M. Gershowitz William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Kathleen Ridolfi See next page for additional authors Repository Citation Ciolino, Dane; Clements, Gary; Gershman, Bennett L.; Gershowitz, Adam M.; Ridolfi, Kathleen; Wiseman, Samuel R.; and Singer, Stephen, "Panel on Prosecutorial Immunity: Deconstructing Connick v. Thompson" (2012). Faculty Publications. 1550. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1550 Copyright c 2012 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs Authors Dane Ciolino, Gary Clements, Bennett L. Gershman, Adam M. Gershowitz, Kathleen Ridolfi, Samuel R. Wiseman, and Stephen Singer This conference proceeding is available at William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ facpubs/1550 PANEL ON PROSECUTORIAL IMMUNITY: DECONSTRUCTING CONNICK V. THOMPSON In November 2011, the Journal hosted a symposium on prosecutorialimmunity at Loyola University New Orleans College of Law. The symposium included an in-depth analysis of Connick v. Thompson. As part of the symposium, the Journal organized a Panel, the transcript of which follows. This transcript consists of the speakers' remarks along with audience participation and questions. The Journal has attempted to preserve the character and substance of the discussion. While this is not a traditional article, the Journalfelt that it would be fitting to include it in its spring volume. PROFESSOR DANE CIOLINo, LOYOLA UNIVERSITY NEW ORLEANS COLLEGE OF LAW (MODERATOR): Okay.
    [Show full text]