DOCSLIB.ORG

Ensuring Competent Counsel in Death Penalty Cases

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ensuring Competent Counsel in Death Penalty Cases S. HRG. 107–485 PROTECTING THE INNOCENT: ENSURING COMPETENT COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 27, 2001 Serial No. J–107–29 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 79–994 DTP WASHINGTON : 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Feb 1 2002 15:31 Jun 26, 2002 Jkt 079994 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\HEARINGS\79994.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware STROM THURMOND, South Carolina HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JON KYL, Arizona CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York MIKE DEWINE, Ohio RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama MARIA CANTWELL, Washington SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BRUCE A. COHEN, Majority Chief Counsel and Staff Director SHARON PROST, Minority Chief Counsel MAKAN DELRAHIM, Minority Staff Director (II) VerDate Feb 1 2002 15:31 Jun 26, 2002 Jkt 079994 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\HEARINGS\79994.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Durbin, Hon. Richard J., a U.S. Senator from the State of Illinois .................... 106 Feingold, Hon. Russell D., a U.S. Senator from the State of Wisconsin ............. 67 Hatch, Hon. Orrin G., a U.S. Senator from the State of Utah ............................ 12 Leahy, Hon. Patrick J., a U.S. Senator from the State of Vermont .................... 6 WITNESSES Brackett, Kevin S., Deputy Solicitor, 16th Judicial District, York, South Caro- lina ........................................................................................................................ 54 Bright, Stephen B., Director, Southern Center for Human Rights, Atlanta, Georgia .................................................................................................................. 31 Collins, Hon. Susan, a U.S. Senator from the State of Maine ............................. 4 Delahunt, Hon. William D., a Representative in Congress from the State of Massachusetts .................................................................................................. 2 Eisenberg, Ronald, Deputy District Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ....... 43 Ellis, Hon. Rodney, Texas State Senator, Austin, Texas ..................................... 27 Graham, Michael R., Roanoke, Virginia ................................................................ 40 LaHood, Hon. Ray, a Representative in Congress from the State of Illinois ..... 1 Pryor, Hon. William H., Jr., Attorney General, State of Alabama, Mont- gomery, Alabama .................................................................................................. 18 Wilkinson, Beth, Co-Chair, Constitution Project’s Death Penalty Initiative, Washington, D.C. ................................................................................................. 50 SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC: Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 76 Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Director, July 5, 2001, letter ................................ 86 Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Director, July 16, 2001, letter .............................. 88 American Bar Association, Governmental Affairs Office, Norman Lefstein, Washington, DC, statement ................................................................................ 88 Benjamin, Steven D., Benjamin & DesPortes, P.C., Richmond, VA, statement . 93 Brackett, Kevin S., Deputy Solicitor, State of South Carolina, York, SC, July 2, 2001, letter ............................................................................................... 95 Bruck, David I., Attorney, Columbia, SC: statement .......................................................................................................... 96 letter, July 2, 2001 ........................................................................................... 100 Constitution Project’s Death Penalty Initiative, Washington, DC, summary of recommendations and attachment ................................................................. 101 Equal Justice Initiative, Bryan A. Stevenson, Executive Director, Mont- gomery, AL, statement ........................................................................................ 107 Former prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and Justice Department offi- cials, endorsement ................................................................................................ 112 Liebman, James S., Simon H. Rifkind Professor of Law, Columbia Law School, New York, NY, July 2, 2001, letter ....................................................... 113 Lloyd, Charles J., Lindquist & Vennum, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, June 26, 2001, letter ..................................................................................................... 116 Louisiana Crisis Assistance Center, Clive Stafford Smith, Director, New Orle- ans, LA, statement ............................................................................................... 117 Mississippi Post-Conviction Counsel Project, Charles J. Press, Director, Jack- son, MS, statement .............................................................................................. 121 Pescetta, Michael, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, statement ......... 123 (III) VerDate Feb 1 2002 15:31 Jun 26, 2002 Jkt 079994 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\HEARINGS\79994.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC IV Page Rowley, Maureen Kearney, Chief Federal Defender, Eastern District of Penn- sylvania, Philadelphia, PA, July 5, 2001, letter ................................................ 125 Smith, Hon. Gordon H., a U.S. Senator from the State of Oregon, statement ... 126 Texas Defender Service, Maurie Levin, Managing Attorney, Austin, TX, state- ment ...................................................................................................................... 127 Young, Denise, Attorney, Tempe, AZ, statement .................................................. 130 VerDate Feb 1 2002 15:31 Jun 26, 2002 Jkt 079994 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\HEARINGS\79994.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC PROTECTING THE INNOCENT: ENSURING COMPETENT COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES WEDNESDAY, JUNE 27, 2001 U.S. SENATE, COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:04 a.m., in room SD–226, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Patrick J. Leahy, Chairman of the Committee, presiding. Present: Senators Leahy, Feinstein, Feingold, Hatch, Specter, and Sessions. Chairman. LEAHY. Good morning. I am going to withhold my opening statement for a few minutes to accommodate two of the most distinguished members of the House who have a vote in a short while. I would just note that the Members are Congressman Ray LaHood, of Illinois, and Congressman William Delahunt, of Massa- chusetts. Both Mr. LaHood and Mr. Delahunt are close personal friends, one a Republican, one a Democrat. They are the main sponsors of this legislation in the other body, and with the permis- sion of Senator Collins, I thought we would go first with their statements. I appreciate very much their taking the time to be here. I also applaud the enormous amount of work done in a totally bipartisan fashion in the other body. Congressman LaHood? STATEMENT OF HON. RAY LAHOOD, A REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS FROM THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Representative LAHOOD. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you very much for accommodating our schedule and the fact that we have a vote. I am going to be very brief. I assume our statements will be made a part of the record. Chairman LEAHY. They will. Representative LAHOOD. Let me just say, as a Republican, as much as I dislike the idea of all of you folks taking over the Senate, I think this really enhances our opportunity to pass this bill, your bill, and thank you for your leadership in this and getting us all involved in the House. You really have shown extraordinary leader- ship on this issue. Just very briefly, Mr. Chairman, I have been a proponent of the death penalty and still am a proponent of the death penalty, but I do believe that when the death penalty is meted out and adminis- (1) VerDate Feb 1 2002 15:31 Jun 26, 2002 Jkt 079994 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 C:\HEARINGS\79994.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC 2 tered, we have to have 100-percent certainty that it is done cor- rectly. I think the Innocence Protection Act, which Mr. Delahunt and I and others—now we have 203 cosponsors in the House, which is far in excess of what we had a year ago, and I think it shows, again, leadership on the part of many organizations. I have sort of taken the lead from my own Governor, Governor George Ryan, whom you know and is a good friend of yours. I know you have had many discussions with him and he has been to Wash- ington and testified before the House Judiciary Committee sub- committee a year ago. I have taken my lead from him because he did place a moratorium on the death penalty because
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Here Is a “Policy” Or “Custom” When There Was Significant Evidence of Brady Violations by the Orleans Parish District Attorney in This and Many Other Cases
    No. _________ ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- EARL TRUVIA; GREGORY BRIGHT, Petitioners, v. HARRY F. CONNICK, in his capacity as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans; GEORGE HEATH, Detective, Individually and in his official capacity as Officer of the City of New Orleans Police Department; JOSEPH MICELI, Individually and in his official capacity as Officer of the City of New Orleans Police Department; THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; EDDIE JORDAN, Respondents. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ERWIN CHEMERINSKY PHILLIP E. FRIDUSS Counsel of Record LANDRUM, FRIDUSS UNIVERSITY OF & ASH, LLC CALIFORNIA, IRVINE 8681 Highway 92 SCHOOL OF LAW Suite 400 401 E. Peltason Woodstock, Georgia 30189 Irvine, California 92697-8000 (678) 384-3012 (949) 824-7722 [email protected] [email protected] ROBIN BRYAN CHEATHAM WILLIAM T. MITCHELL ADAMS & REESE, LLP MICHAEL HOFFER One Shell Square CRUSER & MITCHELL, LLP 701 Poydras St., Suite 4500 275 Scientific Dr. New Orleans, Louisiana 70139 Suite 2000 (504) 581-3234 Norcross, Georgia 30092 [email protected] (404) 881-2622 [email protected] [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Sovereign Invulnerability: Sexual Politics and the Ontology of Rape
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Sovereign Invulnerability: Sexual Politics and the Ontology of Rape A Dissertation Presented by Jane Clare Jones to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy Stony Brook University December 2016 Copyright by Jane Clare Jones 2016 ii Stony Brook University The Graduate School Jane Clare Jones We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Dissertation Advisor – Dr. Edward S Casey Distinguished Professor, Department of Philosophy Chairperson of Defense – Dr. Megan Craig Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy Internal Reader – Dr. Eva Kittay Distinguished Professor, Department of Philosophy External Reader – Dr. Fiona Vera-Gray Durham Law School, Durham University, UK This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Charles Taber Dean of the Graduate School iii Abstract of the Dissertation Sovereign Invulnerability: Sexual Politics and the Ontology of Rape by Jane Clare Jones Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy Stony Brook University 2016 As Rebecca Whisnant has noted, notions of “national…and…bodily (especially sexual) sovereignty are routinely merged in
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty
    California District Attorneys Association Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty Produced in collaboration with the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation MARCH 2003 GILBERT G. OTERO LAWRENCE G. BROWN President Executive Director Prosecutors' Perspective on California's Death Penalty MARCH 2003 CDAA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICERS DIRECTORS PRESIDENT John Paul Bernardi, Los Angeles County Gilbert G. Otero Imperial County Cregor G. Datig, Riverside County SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT Bradford Fenocchio, Placer County David W. Paulson Solano County James P. Fox, San Mateo County SECRETARY-TREASURER Ed Jagels, Kern County Jan Scully Sacramento County Ernest J. LiCalsi, Madera County SERGEANT-AT-ARMS Martin T. Murray, San Mateo County Gerald Shea San Luis Obispo County Rolanda Pierre Dixon, Santa Clara County PAST PRESIDENT Frank J. Vanella, San Bernardino County Gordon Spencer Merced County Terry Wiley, Alameda County Acknowledgments The research and preparation of this document required the effort, skill, and collaboration of some of California’s most experienced capital-case prosecutors and talented administration- of-justice attorneys. Deep gratitude is extended to all who assisted. Special recognition is also deserved by CDAA’s Projects Editor, Kaye Bassett, Esq. This paper would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of the California District Attorneys Association’s Death Penalty White Paper Ad Hoc Committee. CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION DEATH PENALTY WHITE PAPER AD HOC COMMITTEE JIM ANDERSON ALAMEDA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TAMI R. BOGERT CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION SUSAN BLAKE CRIMINAL JUSTICE LEGAL FOUNDATION LAWRENCE G. BROWN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION WARD A. CAMPBELL CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE BRENDA DALY SAN DIEGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE DANE GILLETTE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE DAVID R.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Equity Resource Guide
    RACIAL EQUITY RESOURCE GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Foreword 5 Introduction 7 An Essay by Michael R. Wenger 17 Racial Equity/Racial Healing Tools Dialogue Guides and Resources Selected Papers, Booklets and Magazines Racial Equity Toolkits and Guides to Action Workshops, Convenings and Training Curricula 61 Anchor Organizations 67 Institutions Involved in Research on Structural Racism 83 National Organizing and Advocacy Organizations 123 Media Outreach Traditional Media Social Media 129 Recommended Articles, Books, Films, Videos and More Recommended Articles: Structural/Institutional Racism/Racial Healing Recommended Books Recommended Sources for Documentaries, Videos and Other Materials Recommended Racial Equity Videos, Narratives and Films New Orleans Focused Videos Justice/Incarceration Videos 149 Materials from WKKF Convenings 159 Feedback Form 161 Glossary of Terms for Racial Equity Work About the Preparer 174 Index of Organizations FOREWORD TO THE AMERICA HEALING COMMUNITY, When the W.K. Kellogg Foundation launched America Healing, we set for ourselves the task of building a community of practice for racial healing and equity. Based upon our firm belief that our greatest asset as a foundation is our network of grantees, we wanted to link together the many different organizations whose work we are now supporting as part of a broad collective to remove the racial barriers that limit opportunities for vulnerable children. Our intention is to ensure that our grantees and the broader community can connect with peers, expand their perceptions about possibilities for their work and deepen their understanding of key strategies and tactics in support of those efforts. In 2011, we worked to build this community We believe in a different path forward.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-1608 Petition 68098.Pdf
    Filing #61228839E-Filed08/31/201706:42:25PM RECEIVED, 08/31/201706:43:31 PM,Clerk,Supreme Court APPENDIX A University of Colorado at Boulder Department of sociology Ketchum 173 Michael L. Radelet 327 UCB Professor Boulder, Colorado 803094327 (303) 735-5811 Direct 932 2 8878 °'°'ª ° °ªª Affidavit ofMichael L. Radelet State of Colorado, County of Boulder The undersigned, Michael L. Radelet, hereby declares under penalty ofperjury: 1. I received a Ph.D. in sociology from Purdue University in 1977. After two years of postdoctoral training in Psychiatry at the University ofWisconsin Medical School, Ijoined the faculty at the University ofFlorida in 1979. After twenty-two years ofservice at that university (including the last five as Chair, Department of Sociology), I moved to the University of Colorado in September 2001 as a tenured Professor of Sociology, a position I still retain. I served as the Chair ofthe Sociology Department at the University of Colorado from 2004-2009. 2. Since 1981 I have published six books and six dozen scholarly papers, in the nation's top sociology, criminology, and lawjournals, relating to various aspects of capital punishment. See, for example, Miscarriages ofJustice in Potentially Capital Cases, 40 STANFORD LAW REVIEW 21-179 (1987); FACING THE DEATHPENALTY (Temple University Press, 1989); Choosing Those Who WillDie: Race and the Death Penalty in Florida, 43 FLORIDA LAW REVIEW 1-34 (1991); IN SPITE OF INNOCENCE (Northeastern University Press, 1992); EXECUTING 2 THE MENTALLY ILL (Sage Publications, 1993); THE HISTORY OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN COLORADO (University Press of Colorado, 2017). I have also testified on issues relating to the death penalty before committees ofthe U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • William Gropper's
    US $25 The Global Journal of Prints and Ideas March – April 2014 Volume 3, Number 6 Artists Against Racism and the War, 1968 • Blacklisted: William Gropper • AIDS Activism and the Geldzahler Portfolio Zarina: Paper and Partition • Social Paper • Hieronymus Cock • Prix de Print • Directory 2014 • ≤100 • News New lithographs by Charles Arnoldi Jesse (2013). Five-color lithograph, 13 ¾ x 12 inches, edition of 20. see more new lithographs by Arnoldi at tamarind.unm.edu March – April 2014 In This Issue Volume 3, Number 6 Editor-in-Chief Susan Tallman 2 Susan Tallman On Fierce Barbarians Associate Publisher Miguel de Baca 4 Julie Bernatz The Geldzahler Portfoio as AIDS Activism Managing Editor John Murphy 10 Dana Johnson Blacklisted: William Gropper’s Capriccios Makeda Best 15 News Editor Twenty-Five Artists Against Racism Isabella Kendrick and the War, 1968 Manuscript Editor Prudence Crowther Shaurya Kumar 20 Zarina: Paper and Partition Online Columnist Jessica Cochran & Melissa Potter 25 Sarah Kirk Hanley Papermaking and Social Action Design Director Prix de Print, No. 4 26 Skip Langer Richard H. Axsom Annu Vertanen: Breathing Touch Editorial Associate Michael Ferut Treasures from the Vault 28 Rowan Bain Ester Hernandez, Sun Mad Reviews Britany Salsbury 30 Programs for the Théâtre de l’Oeuvre Kate McCrickard 33 Hieronymus Cock Aux Quatre Vents Alexandra Onuf 36 Hieronymus Cock: The Renaissance Reconceived Jill Bugajski 40 The Art of Influence: Asian Propaganda Sarah Andress 42 Nicola López: Big Eye Susan Tallman 43 Jane Hammond: Snapshot Odyssey On the Cover: Annu Vertanen, detail of Breathing Touch (2012–13), woodcut on Maru Rojas 44 multiple sheets of machine-made Kozo papers, Peter Blake: Found Art: Eggs Unique image.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiguo Oriente 17/06/2016 09:49 A.M
    00 preliminares_Antiguo Oriente 17/06/2016 09:49 a.m. Página 1 ISSN: 1667-9202 CUADERNOS DEL CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE HISTORIA DEL ANTIGUO ORIENTE ANTIGUO ORIENTE Volumen 13 2015 Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina Facultad de Ciencias Sociales Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina 00 preliminares_Antiguo Oriente 17/06/2016 09:49 a.m. Página 3 CUADERNOS DEL CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE HISTORIA DEL ANTIGUO ORIENTE ANTIGUO ORIENTE Volumen 13 2015 Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina Facultad de Ciencias Sociales Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires - Argentina 00 preliminares_Antiguo Oriente 17/06/2016 09:49 a.m. Página 4 Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina Facultad de Ciencias Sociales Departamento de Historia Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente Av. Alicia Moreau de Justo 1500 PB Edificio San Alberto Magno C1107AFD - Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina Sitio web: www.uca.edu.ar/cehao Dirección electrónica: [email protected] Teléfono: (54-11) 4349-0200 ext. 1189 Fax: (54-11) 4338-0791 Antiguo Oriente se encuentra indizada en: BIBIL, University of Lausanne, Suiza; CIRC, Universidad de Granada, España; CLASE, Universidad Autónoma de México; DIALNET, Universidad de La Rioja, España; Fuente Académica Premier, EBSCO, EE.UU.; LATINDEX (catálogo), México; Matriz de Información para el Análisis de Revistas (MIAR), España; Old Testament Abstracts (OTA), EBSCO, EE.UU.; Online Egyptological Bibliography (OEB), Reino Unido; RAMBI, Jewish National and University Library, Jerusalén, Israel; RefDoc, Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique, Francia; SCImago Journal & Country Rank, España; Scopus, Elsevier (Países Bajos); The Serials Directory, EBSCO; Ulrich’s, EE.UU.; Núcleo Básico de Publicaciones Periódicas Científicas y Tecnológicas Argentinas (CONICET).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Miguel De Unamuno's Newspaper
    “WITH WEAPONS OF BURNING WORDS”: THE RHETORIC OF MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO’S NEWSPAPER WRITINGS A Dissertation by ELIZABETH RAY EARLE Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Nathan Crick Committee Members, Leroy Dorsey Alberto Moreiras Randall Sumpter Head of Department, Kevin Barge August 2019 Major Subject: Communication Copyright 2019 Elizabeth Ray Earle ABSTRACT Although he was most famous for his books of fiction and philosophy, 20th century Spanish public intellectual Miguel de Unamuno also wrote a large body of newspaper articles in which he critiqued politics and society during his lifetime. Unamuno lived during a polarized time in Spanish history, and he witnessed many political and social conflicts, including the Third Carlist War, the Spanish-American War, World War I, a military dictatorship, the Second Spanish Republic, Franco’s military coup, and the Spanish Civil War. In the midst of this atmosphere of conflict and polarization, Unamuno used the medium of the newspaper to diagnose Spain’s problem and to present possible solutions. This project examines the rhetorical style that Unamuno developed in response to his political context, as he examined Spanish society and the various political regimes in Spain. As he defined the problem, Unamuno characterized it as one of ideology, excess rationalism, and inauthenticity. To solve this problem, Unamuno approached it in two ways. First, he acted as what he called an “idea-breaker,” or as one who assumes an attitude of skepticism and uses individual thought to break down ideas and dogma.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown and Sword: Executive Power and the Use of Force by The
    CROWN AND SWORD EXECUTIVE POWER AND THE USE OF FORCE BY THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE CROWN AND SWORD EXECUTIVE POWER AND THE USE OF FORCE BY THE AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE CAMERON MOORE Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Moore, Cameron, author. Title: Crown and sword : executive power and the use of force by the Australian Defence Force / Cameron Moore. ISBN: 9781760461553 (paperback) 9781760461560 (ebook) Subjects: Australia. Department of Defence. Executive power--Australia. Internal security--Australia. Australia--Armed Forces. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover photographs by Søren Niedziella flic.kr/p/ ahroZv and Kurtis Garbutt flic.kr/p/9krqeu. This edition © 2017 ANU Press Contents Prefatory Notes . vii List of Maps . ix Introduction . 1 1 . What is Executive Power? . 7 2 . The Australian Defence Force within the Executive . 79 3 . Martial Law . 129 4 . Internal Security . 165 5 . War . 205 6 . External Security . 253 Conclusion: What are the Limits? . 307 Bibliography . 313 Prefatory Notes Acknowledgement I would like to acknowledge the tremendous and unflagging support of my family and friends, my supervisors and my colleagues in the writing of this book. It has been a long journey and I offer my profound thanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel on Prosecutorial Immunity: Deconstructing Connick V. Thompson Dane Ciolino
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2012 Panel on Prosecutorial Immunity: Deconstructing Connick v. Thompson Dane Ciolino Gary Clements Bennett L. Gershman Adam M. Gershowitz William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Kathleen Ridolfi See next page for additional authors Repository Citation Ciolino, Dane; Clements, Gary; Gershman, Bennett L.; Gershowitz, Adam M.; Ridolfi, Kathleen; Wiseman, Samuel R.; and Singer, Stephen, "Panel on Prosecutorial Immunity: Deconstructing Connick v. Thompson" (2012). Faculty Publications. 1550. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1550 Copyright c 2012 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs Authors Dane Ciolino, Gary Clements, Bennett L. Gershman, Adam M. Gershowitz, Kathleen Ridolfi, Samuel R. Wiseman, and Stephen Singer This conference proceeding is available at William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ facpubs/1550 PANEL ON PROSECUTORIAL IMMUNITY: DECONSTRUCTING CONNICK V. THOMPSON In November 2011, the Journal hosted a symposium on prosecutorialimmunity at Loyola University New Orleans College of Law. The symposium included an in-depth analysis of Connick v. Thompson. As part of the symposium, the Journal organized a Panel, the transcript of which follows. This transcript consists of the speakers' remarks along with audience participation and questions. The Journal has attempted to preserve the character and substance of the discussion. While this is not a traditional article, the Journalfelt that it would be fitting to include it in its spring volume. PROFESSOR DANE CIOLINo, LOYOLA UNIVERSITY NEW ORLEANS COLLEGE OF LAW (MODERATOR): Okay.
    [Show full text]
  • Death by Discrimination - the Continuing Role of Race in Capital Cases
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction....................................................................................................................1 The McCleskey obstacle.................................................................................................2 The evidence of bias continues to mount.......................................................................4 North Carolina............................................................................................................6 South Carolina............................................................................................................7 New Jersey.................................................................................................................7 Maryland ....................................................................................................................8 Texas ..........................................................................................................................8 Virginia ......................................................................................................................9 Pennsylvania ............................................................................................................10 Ohio..........................................................................................................................10 Poverty, race, and legal representation........................................................................12 Race, error, and arbitrariness .......................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • DECONSTRUCTING CONNICK V. THOMPSON in November 2011
    TRANSCRIPT-THOMPSON.FORMATTED (DO NOT DELETE) 5/16/2012 1:37 PM PRESENTATION BY JOHN THOMPSON1 – PROSECUTORIAL IMMUNITY: DECONSTRUCTING CONNICK V. THOMPSON In November 2011, the Journal hosted a symposium on Prosecutorial Immunity at Loyola University New Orleans College of Law. The symposium included an in depth analysis of Connick v. Thompson. The following transcript consists of John Thompson’s presentation. The Journal has attempted to preserve the character and substance of the discussion. While this is not a traditional Article, the Journal felt that it would be fitting to include it in its Spring volume. JOHN THOMPSON: Thank you, I wish I could say that I deserve that. Thank you for coming out tonight and hearing my side of the story. Everybody wants to know my side. I had a different seat in this whole ordeal. I had a unique seat, and I heard so many different things just from the few hours I’ve been here. I could imagine what [. .] they were saying from their perspective. I feel like I’m sharing this because this is not John Thompson, it seems like it’s John Thompson right now, because this is my case, but it’s a lot of John Thompsons out there and I believe that’s what gets lost in this whole ordeal. How many more innocent men are in prison? I believe we never think about that. We never think about death row. They tried to kill me, you know. It’s not any malfeasance or nothing, it’s attempted murder, if you look at what the definition of murder is it is premeditated too, because they had a choice.
    [Show full text]